Transcript
Page 1: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Group 19Hing Lawrence LauJonathan LawsonBryan UrquhartSammy Zargaran

The Swimming D nut Sponsor: Dr. Lauga

Page 2: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 2

Dr. Eric Lauga

Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics from Harvard in 2005

Assistant professor at MIT in the Mathematics department from 2006 to 2007

Professor Lauga's research focuses on physical hydrodynamics, micro-fluidics, biophysics and the biomechanics of locomotion

Sammy

Page 3: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 3

Many microorganisms move by means of flagella. The motion of the flagella propagates down the length like a sine wave.

Real World Motivations IProject Objectives

Sammy

Page 4: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 4

,2

30 1, 30 , 1 , 1 6 Re

21 6

3 5Rem msmUD mU D m Es s mE s

E

Similarity analysis can be performed to quantify flow characteristics:

-

This type of creeping flow with Re<<1 is called Stokes Flow

Real World Motivations IIProject Objectives

Sammy

Page 5: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 5

Microorganisms live in the Stokes Flow regime

Viscosity effects dominate over momentum effects

Microorganisms move by means of flagella These flagella have many degrees of freedom

Why isn’t there a microorganism that moves Why isn’t there a microorganism that moves via via single degree of freedom motion?single degree of freedom motion?

Real World Motivations III

Sammy

Project Objectives

Page 6: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 6

Single Degree of Freedom

Capable of motion in Stokes flow (Re << 1)

Never witnessed in nature

A Self-contained torus, designed to move in Stokes Flow, has never been constructed

Project goal was to create a torus that can move in the Stokes Flow regime

How does it work?

Enter The Swimming D nut

Project Description

Sammy

Page 7: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 7

The surface of the torus rotates as shown which results in Torus motion.

ω ωuu

How it Moves I

Jonathan

Page 8: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 8

How it Moves II

Flow Field

Jonathan

Page 9: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 9

Final Design: Overview

Features: Two miniature geared motors to rotate surface Controlled with model aircraft motor driver for wireless

control

Jonathan

Page 10: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 10

Actuation System

Motor

Lawrence

Motor MountDive Disk attachedto Motor Assembly

Page 11: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 11

Power System

Battery Housing

PCB

Battery Protection Circuit and Motor Drive Housing

Lawrence

Cool Feature:snap fitting

base forhousings

Page 12: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 12

Control System

Motor Driver Receiver Housing

Transmitter

Lawrence

Motor Driver Housing

Page 13: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 13

Rotating Skin

Lawrence

Helical Coil as supportto maintain longitudinalcross-section

Page 14: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 14

Demonstration

Page 15: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 15

Heat Generation

Assumptions: The skin of the torus was

a perfect insulator and that no heat would be lost to the fluid

All energy consumed by components was converted into thermal energy

Material Mass (g)Specific Heat

(J/kg*K)

Acrylic 75 1172

Copper (In motor) 27 387

Steel 8 452

Silicon 5.25 700

Air ~0 1042

Total 115.25

Average (by mass) 908.9

The total increase in temperature when the system is run for 30 minutes is 35 K

Jonathan

Page 16: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 16

Power Consumption

Jonathan

Component Power Dissipated as Heat (W) Quantity Total Power ΔQ (J)

Motors 0.57 2 1.14 2052

PCB board ~0 1 ~0 ~0

ESC 0.6 1 0.6 1080

Battery 0.08 4 0.31 560

Total 2.05 3692

Theoretical Power Consumption (not loaded):

Actual Power Consumption (loaded) is 3.7W

while the tested battery life is 52 mins

Theoretical battery life is 92 mins

Page 17: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 17

Fluid Simulation I

To gain some initial insight to the torus motion, a MATLAB simulation was constructed.

Approximating a section as a cylinder, shear stresses were calculated.

Integrating the shear stress with respect to area leaves a net force on the torus which is the basis of its motion.

a ω

Bryan

2

A1 A2

Page 18: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 18

Some results using current size parameters:

Velocity:

This may seem slow, but this is actually faster than the motion expected by our sponsor

Fluid Simulation II

2.2 , 100.6

a cm c cm

1cmu s

Bryan

Page 19: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 19

Performance

The donut successfully rotates as intended around the internal components

Performance Characteristics: Runtime – 52 minutes Rotational Speed – 6 rpm

Bryan

Page 20: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 20

Conclusions / Recommendations

Different Motor Controller Computer control

Actuation Data Acquisition

Fluid-Torus Interface Power

Battery Charging External Power Button

Slip Ring(s)

Bryan

Page 21: Group 19 Hing Lawrence Lau Jonathan Lawson Bryan Urquhart Sammy Zargaran

Swimming Donut 21

Acknowledgments

Dr. Nathan Delson – Instructor, Mechanical Engineer

Dr. Eric Lauga – Project Sponsor, Mathematician

Chris Cassidy – Design Studio Manager, Development Engineer

Anne Tatlock – Faculty Assistant

Tom Chalfant – Machine Shop Manager, Development Engineer

Steve Roberts – Electronics Lab Manager, Development Engineer

Damon Lemmon – Teaching Assistant, UCSD Graduate Student

Shawn Thomson – Application Engineer, MicroMo Electronics

Dave Lischer – Project Design Lab Manager, Development Engineer

Bryan

Dr. NateDelson

Dr. Eric Lauga

Tom Chalfant

Dave Lischer

Chris Cassidy

Bryan


Top Related