1
Genetically Modified Organism (GMO): Prospect andChallenges in Bangladesh
Mahmmmed Harun Or RashidReg: 06-05-1658
Abstract
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are organisms that have been altered using genetic
engineering methods. Although genetic engineering is a common and essential practice in
biotechnology, its specific use in crops is controversial. The key steps involved in genetic
engineering are identifying a trait of interest, isolating that trait, inserting that trait into a desired
organism, and then propagating that organism. Methods for genetic manipulation have rapidly
improved over the last century from simple selective breeding, to inserting genes from one
organism into another, to more recent methods of directly editing the genome. The most
commonly used of genetic engineering product are insulin for human diabetes in case of human.
During 2013 Bangladesh release three Bt Brinjal varieties for commercial cultivation which are
BARI -1, BARI Bt Brinjal-2 and BARI Bt Brinjal-3 that resistant to pod borer. Bangladesh Rice
Research Institute (BRRI) collaboration with Banghabandhu Sheikh Mujubur Rahman
Agricultural University (BSMRAU) release first GM rice BRRI dhan-62 which is zinc rich
during 2013. After BRRI dhan-62, BRRI release GM variety BRRI dhan-86 during 2017 using
anther culture which is on of the biotech tools. Golden rice enrich with vitamin A, Bt tobacco
with fine quality fiber with higher yield and late blight resistant potato develop through genetic
engineering tools are under field testing. Among the Asian countries Bangladesh first release
GM crop and Bangladesh is 29th country where government gives approval of GM crop/food.
2
1.IntroductionGenetically modified Organism (GMO) is basically an organism (plant, animal or
microorganism) created by application of bio-technology which is such a technology by the
application of which a new genetically characterized organism is created by introducing a new
character or genetic carrier or gene in any organism found from that organism or from any wild
species thereof or from completely different type of organism. The term GMO or LMO (Living
Modified Organism) are used interchangeably to denote the same thing pertaining to modern
biotechnology.
Scientists first discovered in 1946 that DNA can be transferred between organisms (Clive 2011).
It is now known that there are several mechanisms for DNA transfer and that these occur in
nature on a large scale, for example, it is a major mechanism for antibiotic resistance in
pathogenic bacteria. The first genetically modified (GM) plant was produced in 1983, using an
antibiotic-resistant tobacco plant. China was the first country to commercialize a transgenic crop
in the early 1990s with the introduction of virus resistant tobacco. In 1994, the transgenic
‘Flavour Saver tomato’ was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for
marketing in the USA. The modification allowed the tomato to delay ripening after picking. In
1995, few transgenic crops received marketing approval. This include canola with modified oil
composition (Calgene), Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn/maize (Ciba-Geigy), cotton resistant to
the herbicide bromoxynil (Calgene), Bt cotton (Monsanto), Bt potatoes (Monsanto), soybeans
resistant to the herbicide glyphosate (Monsanto), virus-resistant squash (Asgrow) and additional
delayed ripening tomatoes (DNAP, Zeneca/Peto, and Monsanto) (Clive 2011). A total of 35
approvals had been granted to commercially grow 8 transgenic crops and one flower crop of
carnations with 8 different traits in 6 countries plus the EU till 1996 (Clive 1996). As of 2011,
the USA leads a list of multiple countries in the production of GM crops. Currently, there are a
number of food species in which a genetically modified version exists (Johnson 2009). Some of
the foods that are available in the market include soybean, canola, potatoes, eggplant,
strawberries, corn, tomatoes, lettuce, cantaloupe, carrots etc. GM products which are currently in
the pipeline include medicines and vaccines, foods and food ingredients, feeds and fibres.
Locating genes for important traits, such as those conferring insect resistance or desired
nutrients-is one of the most limiting steps in the process.
3
In the context of Bangladesh, GM crops and foods are highly debated issue over the last few
years. This issue at first drew the attention of Bangladeshi people after the agreement between
Monsanto and Grameen Bank in 1998. After many days on 30th October 2013 Government by a
notification approved to cultivate then, Bangladesh becomes the first in South Asia to grow a
GM food crop (Daily Star. 2013). The promoters of GM crops or foods argue that, Bangladesh's
population is increasing rapidly but cultivable land is decreasing @ 1% per year, agriculture is
also threatened by adverse impacts of climate change (i.e. salinity, drought, flood, storm), insects
and diseases. So high yielding GMOs (e.g. Golden Rice, Bt. Brinjal and GM Banana) will be the
miracle solution to meet demands of food production and nutrition. On the other hand,
environmentalists allege that, some international companies are trying to deprive Bangladesh
from her rich variety of agricultural crops by appropriating and displacing them by introducing
their own GM crops, which would make Bangladeshi farmers permanently dependent on them
for seeds. Some GM crops may have higher output, but their long term safety for human health,
environment and preservation of biodiversity, and their long term viability for the farmers are yet
to be firmly established. Eco-feminists are also committed not to sacrifice their seed and food
sovereignty for corporate control and profits, as women are primary food-growers and food-
givers claim that, alternative lies in women's hands and minds and demands a paradigm shift
from monocultures to diversity and from chemicals to organic.
However this study have been taken with the respect of following objectives
To review the present senario of GMO crop in Bangladesh.
To clear the concept of people who are very worried about genetically modified foods
and
To brought out the answer are genetically modified crops/food are safe for consumer?
4
2.Material and Methods
This paper is absolutely a review paper. The title is selected with the consultations of my
major professor. All data and information used in this paper are taken from secondary
source. I have collected the data and information from different books, journals, newsletters,
training class and internet. For these purpose, I went BARI, BRRI, BARC and SID library
and BSMRAU also. I visited different websites through internet. Collected data are then
compiled and the paper is prepared.
5
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 What is Genetic Engineering?
The nucleus contains chromosomes and these chromosomes are made from DNA and DNA is
the genetic code. Everyone has got their own gentic code. The genetic code carries information
that makes our body what it is and scientists have now found a way to change our genetic code.
This is called Genetic Engineering.
3.2 What is GM crops/food?
According to ‘World Health Organization’
Genetically modified (GM) foods are foods derived from organisms whose genetic material
(DNA) has been modified in a way at does not occur naturally, i.e. through the introduction
of a gene from a different organism.
GM crops are described by many different names-
Genetically Engineered crops (GE)
Transgenic or Biotech crops
Genetically Modified Organism (GMO)
Figure 1. Simplified figure how Bt gene insert into plant?
6
3.3 What is DNA?
The DNA stands for de-oxy ribonucleic acid. It is a genetic a material of all organism. It is poly
ribo nucleotide chain joining each other. It stored genetic information. James and Francis Watson
received noble prize for discovery of the structure of DNA. It is second most important discovery
in Biology just behind the Charls Darwin.
3.4 Genes
A segment of DNA which express a specific trait. For each traits at least one gene responsible.
More precisely, gene is that segment of DNA that encode a single polypeptide, protein or RNA
molecule
3.5 What is gene staking?Gene stacking – also known as gene pyramiding – is the process of including more than one
transgenic event in one plant to produce stacked traits, stacked transformation events, or a
stacked genetically modified organisms (GMO).
The cultivation of stacked GMOs has risen rapidly since they were first approved, and to date
they were grown on 51 million ha in 2014, about a quarter of the total area under GM crops
worldwide, and are set to become increasingly common.
3.6 Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) global scenario.
The year 2016 was momentous since for the first time, Nobel Laureates released a statement in
support of biotechnology and condemned critics in their critical stance against the technology
and Golden Rice. The UN FAO, IFPRI, the G20 countries and other like-minded bodies, guided
by 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Agriculture committed to eradicate hunger and nutrition in 15
years or less. More importantly, the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
Medicine published a study of 900 research studies on biotech crops since 1996 and found that
genetically modified crops and conventionally-bred crops have no difference in terms of
probable risks to human health and the environment. Biotech crops now have an unblemished
record of safe use and consumption for over 20 years. Future generations can benefit more from
wide choices of biotech crops with improved traits for high yield and nutrition that are ideally
safe for consumption and the environment. At the beginning of the third decade of
commercialization of biotech/GM crops in 2016, 26 countries grew 185.1 million hectares of
7
biotech crops predominantly with agronomic traits in the four major biotech crops of soybean,
maize, cotton, and canola. The accumulated hectarage (planted since 1996) surged to a record 2.1
billion hectares or 5.3 billion acres. Of the total number of 26 ountries planting biotech crops, 19
were developing countries and 7 industrial countries. The ncrease between 2015 and 2016 of
3%, is equivalent to 5.4 million hectares or 13.3 million acres. Developing countries grew 54%
of the global biotech hectares compared to 46% for industrial countries. Soybean occupied 50%
(91.4 million hectares) of the global biotech crop hectarage, 1% below the 2015 area. Herbicide
tolerance has consistently been the dominant trait with 47% of the global hectarage, but is slowly
declining over the years with the increasing prominence of the stacked traits. Stacked traits
increased from 58.5 million hectares in 2015 to 75.4 million hectares in 2016 – an increase of
16.9 million hectares or 41%. Based on the total global crop hectarage, 78% of soybean, 64% of
cotton, 26% of maize and 24% of canola were biotech crops in 2016. The latest data for 1996 to
2015 showed that biotech crops contributed to Food Security, Sustainability and Climate Change
by:increasing crop production valued at US$167.8 billion; providing a better environment, by
saving 619 million kg a.i. of pesticidesin 1996-2015; in 2015 alone reducing CO2emissions by
26.7 billion kg, equivalent to taking ~12 million cars off the road for one year; conserving
biodiversity in the period 1996-2015 by saving 174 million hectares of land (Brookes and
Barfoot, 2017); and helping alleviate poverty for up to 16.5 million small farmers, and their
families totaling >65 million people, who are some of the poorest people in the world. Biotech
crops can increase productivity and income significantly and hence, can serve as an engine of
rural economic growth that can contribute to the alleviation of poverty for the world’s small and
resource-poor farmers. Biotech crops can contribute to a “sustainable agriculture”. Predictions
made by James, C. (2015) that the slight decline in biotech crop area in 2015 due to the low
global commodity price would immediately reverse once crop prices revert to higher levels was
achieved – this is contrary to propaganda from critics that biotech crops is failing farmers.
8
40
23
14
6
6
8.3
USA (40%)
Brazil (23%)
Argentina (14%)
India (6%)
Canada (6%)
China (2%)
Rest of the worlds (8.3%)
Sources: Calculation based on ISAAA (2014). Special Brief 46-2013 Executive Summary,Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2013
http://www.isaaa.org.resources/publication/briefs/46/executivesummary/
Figure 2. GM production of top sixes countries
Figure 3. Global area of Biotech Crops, 1996-2016; Industrial anddeveloping countries (Million hectares). Source: ISAAA 2016
9
Brookes and Barfoot (2017, Forthcoming) revealed that by using biotech crops, environmental
footprint from agriculture was reduced over the last two decades by 619 million kgs of active
ingredient. In 2015 alone, there was a slight decline in the amount of pesticide applications
compared to 2014, due to reduced planting of maize and cotton in 2015.
Table 1. Reduction in Pesticide and Environmental Impact Quotient*
1996-2014 1996-2015 2014alone
2015 alone
Reduction inpesticides (million kgsactives ingredients,a.i.)
583.5 619 40.4% 37.4%
Pestiside saving 8.2% 8.1% 6.4% 6.1%Reduction in (EIQ)** 18.5% 19% 17.6% 18.5%**Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ) = a composite measure based on the various factorscontributing to the environmental impact of an individual active ingredient.*Brookes and Barfoot, 2017.
3.7 Impact of GMO adoption
On average, GM technology has increased crop yields by 21% (Figure 2). These yield increases
are not due to higher genetic yield potential, but to more effective pest control and thus lower
crop damage (Qaim 2003). At the same time, GM crops have reduced pesticide quantity by 37%
and pesticide cost by 39%. The effect on the cost of production is not significant. GM seeds are
more expensive than non-GM seeds, but the additional seed costs are compensated through
savings in chemical and mechanical pest control. Average profit gains for GM-adopting farmers
are 69%.
10
Figure 2. Impacts of GM crop adoption.
Klümper W, Qaim M (2014) A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops. PLOS ONE 9(11): e111629.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111629http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111629
3.8 GMO Maize in the world
For example, a 2014 meta-analysis by two Germans scientists of all GMO crops found, "On
average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop
yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%" (Wilhelm. 2014) It also found that yield
and profit gains were higher in developing countries, which the New York Times did not
mention in its analysis. A 2015 review by PG Economics, an industry-focused consultant firm,
found that GMO crops provided economic benefits of $133.4 billion from 1996 to 2013, with
roughly half of the gains going to farmers in developing nations. About 70 percent of the
economic benefits were attributed to yield and production gains while the remaining 30 percent
came from cost savings.
Figure 4. Impact of GMO crop adoption global scenario.
11
Figure 5. Effects of GMO corn on: grain yield and damaged ears (a), grain quality (toxins), targetpest non-target insects, and residue mass loss.“Response ratios. Effects of GE maize hybrids onthe significant traits: grain yield and damaged ears (a), grain quality (fumonisins,thricotecenes, mycotoxins), target (Diabrotica spp.) and non-target (Braconidae, Cicadellidae)organisms and residue mass loss (b). The response ratio was calculated as the mean percentageof change for the weighted Hedge’s g (g+) values different from zero between the GE hybridsand their isolines. SS = single eventhybrid; DS = double stacked hybrid; TS = triple stackedhybrid;QS = quadruple stacked hybrid.” (Elisa at al 2018)
3.9 Biotech crops mitigate climate change with savings of 23.9 billion kgs of CO2
Conventional breeding is losing the battle against climate change. The rate at whichtemperatures
across the globe are increasing and the frequency of climate-change related stresses occur are
outpacing the speed at which new adapted crop varieties are developed and deployed. Biotech
crops contribute to a reduction of greenhouse gases and help mitigate climate change by
permanent savings in carbon dioxide emissions. This is achieved through reduced use of fossil-
12
based fuels associated with fewer insecticide and herbicide applications and reduction in farm
operations such as ploughing in no-till agriculture associated with the use of herbicide tolerant
crops.In 2015 alone, a total savings of 26.7 billion kgs of CO2 was realized – a slight reduction
(1.1%) from 27 billion kgs in 2014 (Table 2). It is noteworthy that reduction due to
ploughing/tilling contributes greatly to reduced CO2 emission. Tilling mechanically turns over
and breaks up soil to prepare for planting. It incurs the use of fossil fuels and at the same time
leaves soil vulnerable to erosion and contributes to increased pollution and sedimentation in
streams and rivers and loss of land to desertification. According to the World Wildlife
Foundation, half of the topsoil on the planet has been lost in the last 150 years.
Table 2. Saving on CO2 Emission Equated with Number of Cars off the Road*
2014 alone 2015 alone
Saving CO2 emission due to reduce used of fossil based fuels (Billion kgs)
a. Due to reduced insecticide and herbicide sprays 2.20 2.80
b. Due to reduce ploughing 24.80 23.9
Total CO2 emissions 27.0 26.7
Reduction in number of cars off the road (million)
a. Due to reduced insecticide and herbicide sprays 0.97 1.25
b. Due to reduce ploughing 11 ~11(10.06)
Total cars off the road 12 ~12(11.9)
*Brookes and Barfoot, 2017
Less tilling results in less erosion, more water retention, and fewer greenhouse gas emissions due
to fewer trips across the fields and lowered fuel costs as well as decreases machinerymaintenance
costs. Reduced CO2 emissions from biotech crops in
2015 can be equated to removal of ~12 million cars, similar to 2014.
13
3.10 Developing Country Experiences
3.10.1 Bt cotton adoption in India
Cotton is a very important crop for India. However, due to the high incidence of pests, especially
the cotton bollworms, India falls short of the world’s average yield of cotton by 48%, an
equivalent of 280 kg/ha2. Indian farmers often lose up to 50-60% of their crop to the cotton
bollworm. With the commercialization of Bt cotton in India in 2002, the cyclic infestation of
bollworm has been suppressed.
In 2016, India has become the top producer of cotton globally. Indian farmers planted biotech
cotton on 11.2 million hectares, followed by China and USA.2 Adoption of Bt cotton started in
2002 with 3 hybrids planted in six Indian states: Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh,
Karnataka, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. The single gene hybrids have achieved a near phasing
out because of the dual gene cotton hybrids which provided additional protection to various
insect pests. Dual gene hybrids have also helped cotton farmers to earn a higher profit through
cost savings associated with fewer sprays and increased yield of 8-10% higher than single gene
IR cotton hybrids.
Fourteen studies on the impact of Bt cotton were conducted from 1998 to 2013. The results
showed that yield increased by about 31% and insecticide spraying reduced by 39%, which
translate to 88% increase in profitability (US$250/ha).
Qaim and Khouser (2013) conducted a study involving 1,431 farm households in India from
2002 to 2008 to investigate the effect of Bt cotton on farmers’ family income and food security.
According to the findings, the adoption of Bt cotton has significantly improved calorie
consumption and dietary quality, leading to increased family income. The technology reduced
food insecurity by 15-20% among cotton-producing households.
3.11 Methods of Trait Introduction in GM crop
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated plant transformation
Chemically mediated introduction into protoplasts and regeneration
Direct DNA transfer system
Electroporation
14
Conventional breeding - cross hybridization and selection involving transgenic donor(s)
Microparticle bombardment of plant cells or tissue
Pollen-tube pathway (PTP)
3.12 Commercial GM Traits List
Abiotic Stress Tolerance
Altered Growth/Yield
Disease Resistance
Herbicide Tolerance
Insect Resistance
Pollination control system
Table 3. Some trait of crops which already used in commercially and their advantages aregiven below
Trait Advantage Sample Product
Pest-Resistance Less damage by insect, virus,bacteria, etc.
Corn
Herbicide-Resistance Herbicides will kill only weeds, notcorps
Cotton
Delayed Ripening Can be shipped with less damage Tomato
Miniature Size Improved eating quality Watermelon
Improved Sweetness Better tasting Sweet peas
Cole-Resistance Withstands freezing and thawing Strawberries
High starch Absorbs less oil when fried Potato
Polyester Gene Added Better fiber properties Cotton
Growth Hormone Added Faster growth Salmon
Hepatitis B Virus ProteinAdded
May provide immunity to Hepatitis Banana
15
Table 4. Countries with GM Crop Approvals
Argentina, Australia, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Brazil,
Burkina Faso, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia,
Costa Rica, Cuba, Egypt, European Union,
Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iran, Japan, Malaysia,
Mexico, Myanmar, New Zealand, Norway,
Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Philippines, Russian
Federation, Singapore, South Africa, South
Korea, Sudan, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand,
Turkey, United States of America, Uruguay,
Vietnam
Total 36 countries approved and cultivateGMO in the world.
3.13 Bangladesh situation and prospects
Bangladesh releases first genetically modified crop to farmers 2013(Daily star, 30 October,
2013).With the release of BARI Bt Brinjal-1, Bangladesh has become the 29th nation to grow
genetically modified (GM) crops. During the year 2013 after realizing BARI Bt Brinjal-1 same
year BARI Bt Brinjal-2, BARI Bt Brinjal-3 and BARI Bt Brinjal-4 released following approval
from the government’s biosafety regulator. Although environmentalist groups say the
government has released the seeds hurriedly and without enough research. Bt gene inserted in
locally produce brinjal through genetic engineering procedure. The vegetable has been modified
to be resistant to its most common pest, Fruit and Shoot Borers, which can devastate 50-70
percent of a crop. Now Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) has begun
distributing the seedlings of four types of genetically modified brinjal seedling. Doubling of
acreage from 12 hectares in 2014 to 25 hectares in 2015, the International Service for the
Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) credited the success to Bangladesh(ISAAA
2014).
16
Table 5. History of Genetically Modified Crops (GMO) development in Bangladesh
GMO Crop Organization Year of release Comments
BARI Bt Brinjal-1 BARI 2013 Cultivating by farmers
BARI Bt Brinjal-2 2013 Cultivating by farmers
BARI Bt Brinjal-3 2013 Cultivating by farmers
Late blight resistant potato BARI Waiting for release Field testing
Bt cotton CDB Waiting for release Field testing
BRRI dhan-86 BRRI 2017 Seed multiplying, with half atonne of extra yield potentialper hectare over mostpopular variety BRRI dhan-28
BRRI dhan-62 BRRI andBSMRAU
2013 zinc-rich rice variety with 19mg/kg of the micronutrient
Golden rice BRRI Waiting for release Vitamin A riches
Daily star 2013, Daily star 2015, Daily star 2016, Daily star 2017
Inspired by the success of the country's first commercially released biotech crop Bt Brinjal in
2013, Bangladesh is now field testing three more crops developed through applications of agro-
biotechnology. Late blight resistant potato from BARI, Bt Cotton from Cotton Research and
Development Board and golden rice from Bangladesh Rice Research Centre (BRRI). The
ISAAA a non-profit international organisation that keeps watch on production and expansion of
biotech crops worldwide. The ISAAA, governed by an international board of directors, is
composed of three centres: the AfriCenter in Nairobi, Kenya; AmeriCenter, Ithaca, New York;
and the SEAsiaCenter in Los Baños, the Philippines. The ISAAA report said, “Success with has
led Bangladesh to prioritise the field testing of a new late blight resistant potato [an important
crop occupying 0.5 million hectares in Bangladesh] which could be approved as early as possible
during 2018.” (Daily star 2016). Bangladesh is now a potato exporting country. After releasing
GM potato (i,e late blight resistant potato) amount of export would be 10 times more than
present quantity(Daily star 2016). Farmers in Bangladesh spend up to Tk 100 crore a year in
17
spraying 500 tonnes of fungicide to protect this major tuber crop. GM potato will increase
farmer’s income reducing pesticide cost. Importantly, seed (Bt Brinjal) is now being multiplied
to meet the growing needs of substantially more farmers in 2017-18.
3.14 Status of Bt Brinjal in Bangladesh
In the last three years, Bangladesh cautiously advanced the commercial planting of / eggplant
from two hectares planted by 20 farmers in 2014, the first year of commercial planting, to a
remarkable 700 hectares planted by 2,500 farmers in 2016. is the country’s first genetically
modified crop that protects brinjal from the deadly fruit and shoot borer (FSB). The fruit and
shoot borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) is one of the major insectpests of brinjal, which causes losses
of up to 70% in commercial plantings. The winter season of 2016 was the turning point for large
scale adoption of in Bangladesh. Smallholder brinjal farmers who cultivate brinjal on
approximately 50,000 hectares in summer, winter and spring seasons increased planting of to
700 hectares in 2016, a 28-fold increase over 2015 (Table 27). Brinjal farmers in Bangladesh
could choose from four varieties popularly known as Bt Uttara, Bt Kazla, Bt Nayantara and Bt
ISD-006 approved for commercial cultivation in four major brinjal growing regions: Gazipur,
Jamalpur, Pabna and Rangpur.
20
108
250
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Number of farmdemonstrations ofBt Brinjal
Figure 6. Number of farm demonstrations conducted by by Bangladesh AgriculturalResearch Institute(BARI) and Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) of BtBrinjal
18
The majority of farm-level plantings of in 2014 and 2015 were part of the farm demonstrations
closely monitored and executed by the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) and
the Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) of the Government of Bangladesh. These farm
demonstrations commenced in 2013-2014 starting with 20 farm demonstrations and have
increased to 500 for 2016-2017 (Figure 7).
Table 6. Adoption of Bt Brinjal in Bangladesh
Year Adoption of Bt
Brinjal (ha)
Total brinjal
area (ha)
Nos. of Bt
Brinjal farmers
% Adoption
2014 12 50,000 120 <1
2015 25 50,000 250 <1
2016 700 50,000 2500 2
Sources: Analysized and compiled by ISAAA, 2016
Farmers’ opinion of growing based on data collected and analyzed during the field
demonstrations in 2014 and 2015 by BARI and DAE concluded that farmers’ preference of
growing because: – Farmers need not undertake sorting of infested/non-infested brinjal fruits as
varieties were free from infestation of the fruit and shoot borer; – The cost of production of was
significantly lower due to almost no applications of insecticides for control of the fruit and shoot
borer; and, – Farmers obtained higher gross margin due to the bounty of additional fresh healthy
brinjal fruits resulting in higher marketable fruits.
19
Thus, in response to the growing interest by smallholder farmers in , the Bangladesh
Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) produced breeder seeds of varieties namely BARI Bt
begun-1 (Bt Uttara); BARI Bt begun-2 (Bt Kajla); BARI Bt begun-3 (Bt Nayantara); BARI Bt
begun-4 (Bt Iswardi or ISD006). In total, BARI produced 90 kg of breeder seeds in 2014-15, 875
kg in 2015-16 and around 1,500 kg in 2016-17 (Figure 8). In 2016, the Government of
Bangladesh made
3.15 Late Blight Resistant Potato
Potato, an important crop in Bangladesh, is grown on over half a million hectares producing 8.9
million tons of potato annually. The average potato yield in Bangladesh is about 19 tons per
hectare, significantly lower than world average due to heavy infestation of late blight disease.
Farmers in Bangladesh spend US$60.35 (Bangladeshi Takka 5,000) per hectare annually to
apply 400-500 metric tons of fungicide to control late blight disease. In order to control late
blight disease, BARI’s Tuber Crop Research Center in collaboration with ABSP-II has
developed a late blight resistant (LBR) potato variety namely BARI Potato-8 popularly known as
Diamant by introgressing RB gene sourced from Solanum bulbocastonum in 2007. BARI has
90
875
1,500
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Bt BrinjalBreeder Seeds(kg)
Figure 7. Bt Brinjal Breeders Seeds (kg) Production by Bangladesh AgriculturalResearch Institute (BARI)
20
conducted backcrossing, contained and confined multi-location field trials of LBR potato over
the last several years (Table 7).
Table 7. Cronologically Development of LBR potato in Bangladesh, 2008 to2016
YearsNos. of LBRPotato Clones LBR Potato Trial Locations Status
2008-09 >300 CFT 2 Locations 87 hybrids
2009-10 87 hybrids CFT2 Locations Selection
completed
2010-11 10 clone MLT under CFT2 Locations
8 hybrid clone2011-122012-13 8 clone MLT under CFT
6 Locations6 hybrid clone
2013-14 6 clone MLT under CFT6 Locations
6 hybrid clone
2014-15 6 cloneRegulatory trialunder CFT
6 Locations1 hybrid clone
2015-16 1 cloneRegulatory trialunder CFT
6 LocationsTrial complete
Source: BARI; Analyzed by ISAAA 2016
BARI has also carried out the food and feed safety studies including compositional, toxicological
and environmental risk analysis as per the regulatory guidelines including Bangladesh
Guidelines for Food Safety Assessment of GM Plant and the Guidelines for Environmental Risk
Assessment of GM Plants. In December 2016, BARI prepared and submitted a biosafety dossier
on LBR potato for its commercial release to the National Committee on Biosafety (NCB) of the
Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF) in December 2016. Simultaneously, BARI’s
Tuber Crop Research Center started a collaborative research project to develop a late blight
resistant potato variety using multiple gene technology in collaboration with Michigan State
University (MSU) in October 2015. It is expected that the National Committee on Biosafety of
MOEF of the Government of Bangladesh will consider approval of the commercial release of the
first generation LBR potato expressing RB gene sometime in 2017 (Ahmad, 2016).
21
3.16 Biotech Cotton in Bangladesh on trial.Bangladesh is the second largest importer of cotton fiber and uses approximately 4 to 4.5 million
bales of cotton to spin products for the textile sector. Domestic raw cotton production is
abysmally low, with an annual production rate of 150,000 bales from a total cotton area of
40,000 hectares planted by 70,000 farmers. Bangladesh can only meet 2-3% of the total raw
cotton demand of the textile sector and hence relies heavily on imported raw cotton and fibers
from India, USA and Uzbekistan. The Cotton Development Board (CDB) of the Ministry of
Agriculture estimates that the demand for cotton fiber will increase by three-fold from 800,000
tons in 2014 to 2,500,000 tons by 2020 driven by the global demand for clothing and textiles
manufactured in Bangladesh (Uddin, 2014). In order to increase the domestic supply of raw
cotton, the Government of Bangladesh has made a commitment to increase cotton production by
introducing new and improved varieties of cotton hybrids and genetically modified Bt cotton.
Neighboring countries including India, China, Myanmar and Pakistan have already introduced Bt
cotton and significantly increased cotton production in the last couple of years. In recent years,
the Cotton Development Board has field tested single gene Bt cotton hybrid sourced from
Chinese Hubei Seeds in 2015-16. Bangladesh began greenhouse trial of a genetically modified
(GM) cotton variety imported from China. The GM cotton seeds imported from Hubei Provincial
Seed Group Company are infused with genetic traits taken from a soil-dwelling bacterium -
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) - that effectively fights bollworm, a harmful caterpillar responsible for
damaging cotton yields. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) provided greenhouse
facilities to CDB for the GM cotton trial. BARI Biotechnology Division has complete
greenhouse trial completes successfully by December 2015. Than Bt cotton began to a field trial
within the BARI compound next season and then trials for its adaptability was begin at a regional
level in the following season(Daily star,2015). Within three years regional yield trial will be
complete. Bt cotton has the potential to increase the yields up to 20 percent and enhance fibre
quality of cottons as those are not attacked by the bollworms. Probably farmers will get Bt cotton
after seven months when the National Committee on Bio-safety (NCB) gave approval for this
GM variety. CDB set a target to increase annual cotton production to one million bales in the
next five years. Officials said introduction of Bt cotton would help reach that target easily as well
as helping save the money spent for costly imports.
22
3.17 Flavr savr tomato
In our country flavr savor tomato introduce by the company Monsanto. According to the name of
scientist Flavor savor its name is Flavor savor tomato. Now in super market these tomatos are
found. Through genetic engineering, to slow down the ripening process of the tomato and thus
prevent it from softening, while still allowing the tomato to retain its natural colour and
flavor.[3] The tomato was made more resistant to rotting by adding an antisense gene which
interferes with the production of the enzyme polygalacturonase. The enzyme normally
degrades pectin in the cell walls and results in the softening of fruit which makes them more
susceptible to being damaged by fungal infections. The intended effect of slowing down the
softening of Flavr Savr tomatoes would allow the vine-ripe fruits to be harvested like green
tomatoes without greater damage to the tomato itself. The Flavr Savr turned out to disappoint
researchers in that respect, as the antisensed PG gene had a positive effect on shelf life, but not
on the fruit's firmness, so the tomatoes still had to be harvested like any other unmodified
tomatoes. An improved flavor, later achieved through traditional breeding of Flavr Savr and
better tasting varieties, would also contribute to selling Flavr Savr at a premium price at the
supermarket.
The FDA stated that special labeling for these modified tomatoes was not necessary because they
have the essential characteristics of non-modified tomatoes. Specifically, there was no evidence
for health risks, and the nutritional content was unchanged. (Weasel, 2009)
3.17 Example of how Bt Brinjal, Bt Cotton, Bt Soyabean develop?
Bt stand for the name of the Bacteria from which it isolated is Basillus thurengiensis. It contains
Bt gene or Cryo gene. The Cry gene name as it synthesized crystal protein. The characteristics
feature of crystal protein dissolved in alkaline PH. If it dissolves it become toxic. The
Lepidoptera caterpillar gut region is alkaline condition. The plant has no alkaline condition in
physiological process. When the larvae feed leaves as well as they feed crystal protein, crystal
protein dissolved in gut of larvae and become toxic. As a result epithelial cell of gut region
perforated and larvae get killed.
23
3.18 First biotech rice/GM rice in Bangladesh
Bangladesh Rice research institute release first biotech rice during 2017 (Daily Star 2017). It got
release as the name BRRI dhan-86. Anther culture which is frequently used as biotech tools is
applied to develop this rice variety. This anther culture, applied for the first time in rice science
in Bangladesh, is a biotech plant culturing technique where immature pollens are made to divide
and grow into tissues either on solid and liquid medium. BRRI breeders developed that the new
variety, with half a tonne of extra yield potential per hectare over the country's most produced
rice variety BRRI dhan-28, is derived from Iranian rice variety Niamat through application of a
biotech tool called anther culture.
Figure 8. Anther culture mediated first biotech variety develop by BRRI with 0.5 ton extra
yield.
The scientists at the Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) have also developed a new rice
variety with the highest ever zinc (27.6 mg/kg) content. In 2013, Bangladesh released the world's
6 ton/ha
6.5 ton/ha
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BRRI dhan 28 BRRI dhan-86 (Antherculture mediate variety)
Ton/ha
24
first biofortified zinc-rich rice variety BRRI dhan-62 with 19 mg/kg of the micronutrient. Since
then countries scientists at BRRI and Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural
University (BSMRAU) have, so far, developed six zinc-rich rice varieties with the richest in zinc
content (Daily Star 2017).
3.19 Second GM rice ready for release (Golden Rice)
Rice is a globally major staple food. It is also a main staple food in Bangladesh. Vitamin A
deficiency is a problem in developing countries. Plants synthesize provitamin A carotenoids,
such as -carotene, which are converted to vitamin A in the human body. Natural sources of -
carotene include green leafy vegetables, yellow vegetables, and broccoli. However, when these
vegetables are cooked or processed, their nutritional levels decline.
Rice does not contain any beta carotene. Dependence on rice as the predominant food source,
therefore, necessarily leads to Vitamin A deficiency (VAD), most severely affecting small
children and pregnant women. According to World Health Organisation (WHO 2010) global
database on vitamin A deficiency, one in every five pre-school children in Bangladesh is vitamin
A-deficient. Among pregnant women, 23.7 percent suffer from the deficiency.
Meanwhile, scientists at the Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) told The Daily Star that
on completion of a successful trial of the genetically engineered Golden Rice at the transgenic
screen house of BRRI, they have taken the biotech rice GR-2 E BRRI dhan-29 to confined field
trials late last year.
As follow-up steps, open-field and multi-location trials would be conducted, setting into motion
the last stage for its release to the farmers.
Along with two other rice varieties (IR-64, a variety developed by the International Rice
Research Institute, and RC-28, a Filipino variety), BRRI dhan-29, one of Bangladesh's most
productive rice varieties, has been genetically engineered to have producing beta carotene (also
known as pro-vitamin A). This has been widely publicized as Golden Rice for its yellowish
colour.
25
Consumption of only 150 gram of Golden Rice a day is expected to supply half of the
recommended daily intake (RDA) of vitamin A for an adult. People in Bangladesh depend on
rice for 70 percent of their daily calorie intakes.
Figure 9. The colors of normal rice and golden rices which contain β-carotene.
Therefore it was necessary to use recombinant genetic techniques, not conventional breeding, to
develop a rice endosperm that would produce carotene. The entire -carotene biosynthesis
pathway (three genes on three vectors) were transformed into rice endosperm using
Agrobacterium. The result were yellow endosperms and gained the name Golden Rice. The
yellow color was from the -carotene formed in the endosperm (8). By 2002, Beyer et al. had
refined the technique and were able to transform the -carotene biosynthesis pathway by either
single- or co-transformations of cDNA constructs. They used 2 genes from daffodil Narcissus
psuedonarcissus and 1 gene from a bacterium Bacillus thurengiensis (11). The resulting Golden
Rice yielded 1.6 – 2.0 µg -carotene/g of dry rice. There have also been considerations for
crossing Golden Rice with a rice producing high iron because -carotene helps increase the
bioavailability of iron (11). At this point, Golden Rice is a good resource for a supplementary
source of -carotene and subsequently, vitamin A.
3.20 Future directions for the creation of GMOs in Bangladesh
Humans’ ability to modify crops for improved yields and nutrients in a given environment is a
keystone of agriculture. The technological advancement from selective breeding to genetic
engineering has opened up a large realm of possibilities for the future of our food. As techniques
Normal rice Golden rice
26
for genetic engineering, such as new RNAi- and nuclease-based technologies that allow for
direct modification of the genome, steadily improve, our ability to create new GMOs will also
grow. As our scientific capabilities expand it is essential that we discuss the ethics and ideals
surrounding GMOs so that we may effectively and safely use this technology in a way that is
acceptable to the public.
3.21 Advantages of GMOs:
Saves the use of toxic chemicals. GM crops can be made resistant to pests, so pesticides
do not need to be sprayed on them. This is also better on the environment!
Prevents wasted crops. If pests cannot eat the crops, nothing goes to waste. Therefore
farmers make more money!
It could potentially solve hunger. Many people agree that there is not enough food in the
world to feed everybody. As genetically modified foods increase the yields of crops,
more food is produced by farmers.
We can begin to grow foods in different conditions. For instance. Straw berries can be
genetically engineered to grow in frosts. Other foods that grow in cold climates could be
engineered to grow in hot climates (such as African where much of the continent does not
have enough food).
3.22 Disadvantages of GMOs:
There have been numerous criticisms leveled at genetically modified produce and it is important
that we as the consumer are informed about the possible drawbacks of a product.
Changing plant may have lasting effects on other organisms in the ecosystem. The change in a
plant may cause it to be toxic to an insect or animal that uses it as its main food source.
Due to the widespread use of insect resistant genes in crops the insects may become resistant to
the genetic modifications. This world causes a widespread loss of crops and plants that have the
natural immunity leading to a loss in biodiversity.
Breeding and cross pollination across unintended species could occur resulting in things such as
insect resistant weeds.
27
Genetic modification can also make it difficult to know what you are eating, as a plant could
contain animals products via genetic engineering. This could cause issues for those with dietary
restrictions and religious commitments.
Unintendent side effects to humans, Allergic reactions, Infertility, Birth defects, Lethal to
beneficial insects, Super weeds and Super pests etc.
35%
25%
20%
10%
6%
4%
Technology is unproven
Natural boundary areviolated
The GM market is controlby larges corporate
Unintendent side effects tohumans
Lethal to beneficial insects
Super weeds and Superpests etc.
Figure 10. Predominant disadvantages of GMOs
28
4. Conclusions1. Present status of GMO crop is satisfactory considering among South Asian countries but not
up to the level comparing population growth. Bright scopes are waiting to utilize GMO to meet
country demand.
2. The concept of the consumer is not clear about GMOs. Scientist communities especially agro
knowledge based society should give effort to remove fear facto of consumer about GMO.
3. Genetically modified organism (GMO) foods are feared and hated by environmentalists and
the public alike. Yet the scientific assessment of GMOs is remarkably different. Every major
scientific evaluation of GMO technology has concluded that GMOs are safe for human
consumption and are a benefit to the environment.
29
5. Recommendations
I agree with the use of transgenic crops. I think that they should be used, because the new
organisms have some benefits that can be very useful.
For example, Golden Rice helps people who eat rice, but don’t get enough vitamin A. Also, there
are crops that are resistant to herbicide, which saves farmers time and money.
30
6.ReferencesAhmad R. 2016. Second GM crop ready for release, Daily Star, 6 January 2017.
Berberich S. A, Ream J. E, Jackson T. L, Wood R, Stipanovic R, Harvey P, Patzer S and FuchsR. L. 1996. The composition of insect-protected cottonseed is equivalent to that ofconventional cottonseed. J Agric Food Chem. 44:365–371. doi:10.1021/jf950304i. [Cross Ref]
Beyer P, Al-Babili S, Ye XD, Lucca P, Schaub P, Welsch R, Potrykus, I. 2002. Golden rice:Introducing the -carotene biosynthesis pathway into rice endosperm by geneticengineering to defeat vitamin A deficiency. Journal of Nutrition. 132:506-510.
Brookes G and P Barfoot. 2017. Environmental impacts of GM crop use 1996–2013: impacts onpesticide use and carbon emissions. GM Crops. 6:103-33.
Clive J. 1996. Global review of the field testing and commercialization of transgenic plants:1986 to 1995. The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech.Applications. http://www.isaaa.org/kc/Publications/pdfs/isaaabriefs/Briefs%201.pdf.Retrieved on 17 April, 2018.
Clive J. 2011. Global status of commercialized Biotech/GM crops. ISAAA Briefs 43. Ithaca:International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications.
Daily Star. 2013. Bangladesh releases first genetically modified crop to farmers. Published inDaily Star, 30 October, 2013. Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Daily Star. 2015. GM cotton on trial. Published in Daily Star, 14 July, 2017. Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Daily Star. 2016. Field test on for 3 more GM crops. Published in Daily Star, 24 January, 2014.Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Daily Star. 2017. Country's first biotech rice released. Published in Daily Star, 28 Decemver,2017. Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Elisa P., S Bedini., M Nuti and E Laura. 2018. Impact of genetically engineered maize onagronomic, environmental and toxicological traits: a meta-analysis of 21 years of fielddata. Scientific Reports Journal. volume 8. Article number: 3113., Pisa, Italy
ISAAA (Service for the Acquisition of Agro Application). 2014. Special Brief 46-2013Executive Summary, Global Status of Commercialised Biotech/GM Crops.2013,http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/46/executivesummary.
31
ISAAA. 2014. Special Brief 46-2013 executive Summary, Global Status of CommercializedBiotech/GM Crops: 2013. http//www.isaaa.org.resources/publication/briefs/46/executivessummary/
ISAAA. 2016. Special Brief 46-2013 executive Summary, Global Status of CommercializedBiotech/GM Crops: 2013. http//www.isaaa.org.resources/publication/briefs/46/executivessummary/
James, C. 2015. 20th Anniversary (1996to 2015) of the Global Commercialization of BiotechCrops and Biotech Crop Highlights in 2015. ISAAA Brief 51. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY, USA.http://www.isaaa.org.
Johnson S. R. 2009. Quantification of the impacts on US Agriculture of Biotechnology-DerivedCrops Planted in 2008. Washington DC: National Centre for Food and AgriculturalPolicy.
Novak W. K, Haslberger A. G. 2000. Substantial equivalence of antinutrients and inherent planttoxins in genetically modified novel foods. Food Chem Toxicol. 38:473–483. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00040-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Oltikar A. 2001.“Vitamin A” in Medline Plus. (Accessed on March 26, 2003 athttp://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002400.htm)
Qaim M and D. Zilberman. 2003 Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developingcountries. Science 299: 900–902
Uddin M. G. 2014. Indigo Ring Dyeing of Cotton Warp Yarns for Denim Fabric. Chemical andMaterials Engineering. 2: 149 - 154.
Weasel and H Lisa. 2009. Food Fray. Amacom Publishing. New York, USA.
WHO. 2010. Expert Group. Vitamin A Deficiency in Bangladesh and Xerophthal-mia. Tech.Rep. Ser. No. 590. Genevahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/12846591_Vitamin_A_deficiency_in_Bangladesh_A_review_and_recommendations_for_improvement [accessed Apr 29 2018].
WHO. 2015. Expert Group. Vitamin A Deficiency in Bangladesh and Xerophthal-mia. Tech.Rep. Ser. No. 1020. Geneva.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12846591_Vitamin_A_deficiency_in_Bangladesh_A_review_and_recommendations_for_improvement [accessed Apr 24 2018].
Wilhelm K and Q. Matin. 2014. A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops.PLOS ONE.9:11(1-5)
32
Ye X. D, Al-Babili S, Kloti A, J. Zhang , P Lucca , P. Beyer, I. Potrykus. 2000. Engineering theprovitamin A (-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm.Science. 287:303-305.
Zimmermann M. B, and R. F. Hurrell. 2002. Improving iron, zinc and vitamin A nutritionthrough plant biotechnology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology.13:142-145.