FACULTY OF TECHNOLOG Y

FACULTY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

Author: Supervisor1:

Thesis title:

Nature of the work2: Commissioned by:

GATEGORY EVALUATION

1. Scope of the topic narrow 1 2 3 broad3

2. Degree of difficulty (theory, abstraction) easy 1 2 3 difficult

3. Thesis structure (logical structure of the work) poor 1 2 3 4 5 good

4. Introduction of the research problem and previous research poor 1 2 3 4 5 good

5. Completion of goals poor 1 2 3 4 5 good

6. Author’s evaluation of results poor 1 2 3 4 5 good

7. Significance of results low 1 2 3 4 5 great

8. Amount of supervision required more 1 2 3 less

9. Language of the thesis (text structure, spelling) poor 1 2 3 4 5 good

10. Layout and appearance (following instructions) poor 1 2 3 good

Total points4

General evaluation:

Date: Suggested grade:

Reviewers:

Clafication of signatures:

Supervisor (at the University) Second reviewer

1 Supervisor at the University 2 Used evaluation scale: research, product development, other 3 The scale of 1 – 3 is applied to categories that are difficult to evaluate 4 Attach a summary to this evaluation. Suggested grading scale: 10 – 15 pts.sufficient (1); 16 – 21 pts. satisfactory (2); 22 – 28 pts. good (3);

29 – 35 pts. very good (4); 36 – 42 pts. excellent (5).