![Page 1: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Extending life for people with a
terminal illness: a moral right or an
expensive death?
Empirical and methodological issuesRachel Baker, Helen Mason & Neil McHugh
Glasgow Caledonian University
Job van Exel Erasmus University Rotterdam
![Page 2: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview of the session
• Introduction to the project– Background– Research objectives– Methods
• Three presentations
• Discussion
![Page 3: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
UK MRC Methodology Panel funding 2011-2014
“Is ‘end-of-life’ care more valuable? Measuring societal views on health care resource allocation using the new Q2S method.”
Rachel Baker, Neil McHugh, Helen Mason, Cam Donaldson, Laura Williamson, Jon Godwin,
(GCU)Marissa Collins, Rohan Deogaonkar
Job van Exel (Erasmus, Rotterdam)
Cathy Hutchinson (Beatson Cancer Centre, NHS Greater Glasgow &Clyde)
![Page 4: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Starting point of the study
• Scarcity and health care resource allocation in publicly funded health systems. → Under limited budgets, decisions must be made
about which treatments (not) to fund. • Considerations of fairness and relative value of
health gains benefiting different patient groups in different ways.→ Are equal sized health gains ‘worth’ the same
regardless of who benefits and in what ways?
![Page 5: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
NICE End of life Supplementary guidance
• Specific criteria:– less than 2 years to live– treatments would result in a gain of at least 3 months
of increased life expectancy – drug is licensed for a relatively small patient group
“The Institute recognises that the public, generally, places special value on treatments that prolong life – even for a few months – at the end of life, as long as that extension of life is of reasonable quality (at least pain-free if not disability-free). NICE has therefore provided its advisory bodies with supplementary advice about the circumstances under which they should consider advising, as cost-effective, treatments costing >£30,000 per QALY.”Rawlins et al (2010) Brit j of Clinical Pharmacology, p 348
![Page 7: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Research Objectives
1. To identify and describe societal perspectives on the (relative) value of end of life technologies by eliciting the views of both members of the public and experts in relevant fields;
2. To develop methods to investigate the distribution of those views, including their association with other characteristics, in a nationally representative sample of the UK general public.
Q methodology
Survey methods
Methodological, quantitative
Empirical, qualitative
5,000 online questionnaire respondents
50 experts; 250 public; face to face Q sorts
![Page 8: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
A little bit about Q methodology
• What is Q methodology? A set of connected techniques designed to enable the study of ‘subjectivity’: views, opinions, beliefs, values, tastes, preferences…
“Only subjective opinions are at
issue in Q, and although they are
typically unprovable, they can
nonetheless be shown to have
structure and form, and it is the task
of Q technique to render this form
manifest for purposes of observation
and study.”
Brown, 1986, p. 58
![Page 9: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• What goes in:
– People’s rank ordering of statements of opinion
– Their explanations of why
• What we do:
– Look for patterns between those orderings
– Interpret the patterns
• What comes out:
– Rich descriptions of a small number of shared views
– Distinguishing and consensus issues
A little more bit about Q methodology
![Page 10: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
FACTOR A
FACTOR B
FACTOR C
![Page 11: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
A little more bit about Q methodology
• What goes in:
– People’s rank ordering of statements of opinion
– Their explanations of why
• What we do:
– Look for patterns between those orderings
– Interpret the patterns
• What comes out:
– Rich descriptions of a small number of shared views
– Distinguishing and consensus issues
![Page 12: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
A little bit about Q & survey
• New grounds
– Develop and test five approaches
– Today we focus on one approach
![Page 13: Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070323/56649ddd5503460f94ad5f2b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Three presentations
• Identifying societal perspectives on the relative value of life extending end of life technologiesRachel Baker
• Investigating the prevalence and distribution of views across the UK populationHelen Mason
• Life-extending technologies for terminally ill patients: views v policy choicesNeil McHugh