GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 1
Energetic Particles in Plasmas
James W. Van Dam
Institute for Fusion StudiesThe University of Texas at Austin
May 1-2, 2006
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 2
Introduction
• In addition to thermal ions and electrons, plasmas often contain a supra-thermal species = “energetic particles”– Highly energetic (Th >> Ti) and comparable pressure (nhTh ! niTi)
• Energetic particles can be created from various sources:– Ion/electron cyclotron heating or neutral beam injection —> high energy “tails”– Fusion reactions (e.g., for D-T, v" ! vAlfvén, hence instabilities are possible)
• The plasma physics of energetic particles is of interest to:– Laboratory fusion plasmas (alphas provide self-heating to sustain ignition)– Space and astrophysical plasmas (e.g., proton ring in Earth’s magnetosphere)– High-energy-physics accelerators (collective effects)
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 3
Impacts
• Energetic particles per se:– Excitation of various Alfvén-type instabilities (lead to anomalous transport)– Redistribution and loss (reduces alpha particle heating efficiency; causes heat
loading and damage to plasma-facing components)
• Integrated with overall plasma behavior:– Macrostability (fishbones & monster sawteeth; ballooning modes; disruptions
and runaway electrons)– Transport (ripple loss; profile modification; rotation generation)– Heating and current drive (dominant nonlinear self-heating)– Edge physics (resistive wall mode stability)– Burn dynamics (thermal burn stability; fuel dilution by helium ash)
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 4
GCEP Questions
• Scientific issues:– What are the scientific and technical barriers to the realization of fusion power
that are being addressed in energetic particle physics?– What breakthroughs are still required for overcoming them?
• Suggestions:– Summarize the research priorities, and why.– Are they covered by or complimentary to current programs?– Where could GCEP contribute and have best impact?
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 5
Barriers and Breakthroughs
• Indirect (infer from wave properties)
• Direct (measure core plasma fluctuations andenergetic particle distribution function)
Diagnostics
• Convective vs diffusive
• n=0 response (Geodesic Acoustic Mode)
• Multi-mode experiments (avalanche)
Energetic particle losses
• Fluid & kinetic resonances
• Near-marginality; hard vs soft behavior
Nonlinear wave dynamics
Growth/damping ratesInstability thresholds
Needed BreakthroughsSci/Tech Barriers
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 6
Instability Thresholds
• Fast particles can destabilize a largetaxonomy of Alfvén modes (*AE)– e.g., Toroidal Alfvén Eigenmode (TAE)
• Mode identification is robust:– Frequency, mode structure, polarization
• Threshold is determined by balance of:– Growth rate (reliably calculate)– Damping rate (calculation is very
sensitive to parameters, profiles, lengthscales—but can measure withactive/passive antennas)
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 7
ITER Stability
• ITER will operate with a large population of super-Alfvénic energetic particles– New small-wavelength (#*) regime implies presence of many modes
– NSTX (low-B, low-shear) is an excellent laboratory for fast particle studies
FredricksonPitchfork bifurcations (JET)
#*-1 =
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 8
Nonlinear Theory: Comparisons
• Excellent agreement with experiments• Excellent agreement between theory(single mode) and simulation
Solid curve = Berk-Breizman theory(with sources and sinks)
Circles = White-Chen $f code
0
1 10-7
2 10-7
3 10-7
4 10-7
5 10-7
6 10-7
7 10-7
Am
plitu
de (
a.u.
)
Experiment
52.56 52.6 52.64 52.68 52.72
Central lineUpshifted sidebandDownshifted sideband
0
1 10- 7
2 10- 7
3 10- 7
4 10- 7
5 10- 7
6 10- 7
7 10- 7
t (sec)
Simulation
Am
plitu
de (
a.u.
)
Pitchfork bifurcations (JET)
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 9
TAE Intermittent Losses• Simulations of rapid losses
– Recently added Geodesic Acoustic Mode
Figure 8 (Y. Todo et al.)
Counter-injectedbeam ions
Co-injectedbeam ions
Todo et al. (2003)
Notable incident of hole punched in TFTRvacuum vessel by lost fast ions
K.L. Wong (1990)
• Toroidal Alfvén Eigenmode exp’ts– Loss of fast heating ions (seen
from reduced neutron rate)
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 10
Using Wave Properties -1• Determine internal fields from
frequency sweeping
• Determine internal fields from2nd harmonic Alfvén Cascadeperturbed density
Theory & simulation (Petviashvili et al.)
TAEs in MAST (Gryaznevich) “MHD spectroscopy”
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 11
Using Wave Properties -2• Temperature inferred from low-
frequency suppression ofCascade modes
• Monitor qmin (for creating an internaltransport barrier) with Grand Cascadeonset
Joffrin et al.
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 12
New Diagnostics-1
• A number of new/upgradeddiagnostics can now measureinternal fluctuations– Interferometry
– Reflectrometry
– Far Infrared Scattering
– Phase Contrast Imaging
– Beam Emission Spectroscopy
– Electron Cyclotron Emission
Sharapov, PRL 93 (2004) 165001
JET data
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 13
New Diagnostics-2
• Recent new fast ion profilediagnostics– Collective Thomson scattering
– Solid-state Neutral ParticleAnalysis
– Neutron Collimators
Gamma-ray tomography (Kiptily)
D-alpha (Heidbrink)
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 14
Research Priorities
User-friendly codesSome work being doneAssess instabilitythresholds (e.g., ITER)
Int’l collaboration (JA)Modest effortQuantify fast iontransport
Joint postdoc: fishbone;marginal stability profiles
Modest effortUnderstand nonlineardynamics
Int’l collaboration (EU)Some work being done onexisting experiments
Exploit wave propertiesfor indirect diagnostics
New diagnostics forburning plasma context
Good work being done onexisting experiments
Develop new fastparticle diagnostics
GCEPContribute
CurrentPrograms
Priorities
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 15
Opportunities/Alternatives
• Energetic particle physics area:– Alpha “channeling”
– Rotation generation and current drivegeneration by alpha particles to maintainAdvanced Tokamak operation
– Alfvén waves in linear device (LAPD)
– High-energy particles in space physics
• Other areas:– Liquid metal walls– Advanced divertors
• Educational proposal
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 16
Alpha “Channeling”
• Idea for transferring energy of fusionalphas directly to plasma ions throughwaves– Avoids inefficient intermediate step of
slowing down on thermal electrons
• TFTR experiments showed that thereverse process—energy transfer tobeam ions by RF wave heating—canoccur– The corresponding interaction with
alpha particles has not yet beenobserved
Fisch & Rax
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 17
Rotation Generation
• Idea for creating sheared rotation and negativemagnetic shear (conducive to formation of“internal transport barrier”) by having Alfvéninstabilities redistribute fast ions radiallyoutward
– Recent experimental indications (DIII-D)– Suggests phase-space engineering in burning
plasma to optimize performance by using trappedenergetic particles to generate flow and controlnon-inductive current profile (sustain AdvancedTokamak operation as a natural steady state?)
K. Wong
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 18
Basic Wave Studies
• LArge Plasma Device (LAPD), akaBasic Plasma Science Facility (BaPSF)– Long (20 m), large-diameter (1 m),
well-diagnosed linear plasma facilitywith uniform guiding magnetic field
– Useful for basic studies of propagationand nonlinear properties of waves
– Recent idea to apply quasi-periodicmulti-mirror field to study Alfvén “gap”modes and trapped particle effects
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 19
Space Physics
• Use fast particle methodology foranalysis of dipole stability of very-high-pressure plasma– Also explains “substorms” in Earth’s
magnetosphere
MIT & Columbia
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 20
Liquid Metal Walls
• Innovation: confine plasma withliquid (instead of solid) metal walls– Removes high heat flux– Stabilizes plasma– Immune to neutrons– Enhance tritium breeding– No thermal stress
u u u
Ja Poloidal Ja % B Radial
B Toroidal
• Invention of “soaker hose” concept:– Coat the walls with slow-streaming
liquid metal
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 21
Advanced Divertors
Kotschenreuther et al.
New X-divertor coils create an extra x-pointon each divertor “leg”
NewInboard
X-DivertorCoils
• Fusion reactor heating power is 5-10 timeshigher than in ITER (P" ~ 100 MW)
• ITER is at the limit for standard divertor;hence does not extrapolate to a reactor
NewOutboard
X-DivertorCoils
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 22
ITER Summer School
• Need to train the next generation of young people to work on ITER
• Propose a GCEP Summer School on ITER:– Teach the integrated physics and technology of burning plasmas (including
energetic particles)– Include lectures on global climate and world energy– Publish the lectures (book; online videos)– Hold it on university campuses; rotate the location around the country– Scholarships to cover student costs– Accessible to postdocs, graduate students, and advanced undergraduates
GCEP: Energetic Particles in Plasmas 23
References• U.S. Burning Plasma Workshop (Oak Ridge, TN, 2005):
www.burningplasma.org/WS_05/html– Energetic particle physics plenary talk, break-out group presentations, and summary
• 9th IAEA Technical Meeting on Energetic Particles in Magnetic Confinement Systems(Takayama, Japan, 2005): http://htpp.lhd.nifs.ac.jp/IAEATM-EP2005/index.html
• Joint Transport Task Force/US-Japan JIFT Workshop on Energetic Particles (Napa, CA,2005): www.mfescience.org/TTF2005/
• 8th IAEA Technical Meeting on Energetic Particles in Magnetic Confinement Systems (LaJolla, CA, 2003): www.gat.com/conferences/iaea-tm-energetic/index.html
• ITER Physics Basis Document, Chap. 5 “Energetic Particles,” Nuclear Fusion 29, 3471(1999).