Download - Diffusion egg presentation
![Page 1: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Effect of Water Velocity on
OsmosisKaren Ni, Mara Tynan, and Joyce Yan
![Page 2: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Hypothesis
• To understand how water velocity affects the rate of osmosis.
• As the velocity of the water increases, the rate of osmosis will increase.
![Page 3: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• osmosis- movement of water across a selectively permeable membrane from an hypotonic to hypertonic environment
• velocity- speed with direction
• acceleration- Δvelocity
• increased height=faster final velocity
• faster velocity=water molecules pass through membrane and enter cell faster
• Δd=.5at2+Vit
Introduction
![Page 4: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Materialso Three eggso 5% vinegar solutiono Beakers:
o 2-100mL o 1-500mLo 4-250mL
o 100mL graduated cylinder
o tap watero thermometero 2 funnelso cheesecloth
o tapeo 2 meter stickso rubber tubingo scissorso timero electronic mass
scaleo paper towels
![Page 5: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Methodo Eggs deshelledo For all trials
mass taken before and after volume of remaining water measured 21oC water 60s
o Control each egg placed in 250mL for 60s
o Experimental Egg placed on the funnel with the
cheesecloth stretch over it. Water poured down the tube at different
lengths (therefore speeds and velocities)
![Page 6: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
pictures of method
![Page 7: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Results: 1.5 m
Trial: Initial Mass (grams)
Final Mass (grams)
Difference in Mass (grams)
1 89.7 90.25 0.55
2 82.85 82.9 0.05
3 81.66 81.78 0.12
Average Difference in Mass: 0.24 grams
![Page 8: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Results: 1 mTrial: Initial Mass
(grams)Final Mass (grams)
Difference in Mass (grams)
1 90.37 90.6 0.23
2 82.93 83.03 0.1
3 81.44 81.63 0.19
Average Difference in Mass: 0.17 grams
![Page 9: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Results: .5 m
Trial: Initial Mass (grams)
Final Mass (grams)
Difference in Mass (grams)
1 90.11 90.24 0.13
2 83.01 83.19 0.18
3 81.42 81.63 0.21
Average Difference in Mass: 0.17 grams
![Page 10: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Results: O m (Constant)Trial: Initial Mass
(grams)Final Mass (grams)
Difference in Mass (grams)
1 83.65 84.08 0.43
2 82.47 82.75 0.28
3 80.93 81.17 0.24
Average Difference in Mass: 0.32 grams
![Page 11: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Graph (With Control considered)
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.60
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
Average Difference of Mass in Different Heights of Water
Height Water was Dropped
Ave
rag
e D
iffe
ren
ce i
n M
ass
(gra
ms)
![Page 12: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Graph (Without Control considered)
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.60
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Average Difference in Mass in Different Heights of Water
Height Water was dropped (meters)
Ave
rag
e M
ass
Dif
fere
nce
(g
)
![Page 13: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Full Scatter Plot (with trendline)
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.60
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
f(x) = 0.0666666666666667 x + 0.128888888888889R² = 0.0397719740156436
Difference in Mass over Different Heights
Height Water was dropped (meters)
Dif
fere
nce
in
Mas
s (g
ram
s)
![Page 14: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Averages of difference in mass seemed to increase slightly as height increasedo Individual trials showed that for the
highest height tested (1.5m) two of the trials in fact displayed a lower difference than the averages of all three heights
oOne high outlier (0.55 g) skewed average
• Control group exhibited a greater average difference in mass than that of all heights.
Analysis
![Page 15: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• Data does not support hypothesiso Lin-reg T test comes up with a p value of
0.332 Above the significance level- not sufficient
evidence to show that there was a positive association between water velocity and rate of osmosis.
Conclusion
![Page 16: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Concentration of water in eggs
• Rubber tubing• Consistency of
pouring water
Errors
![Page 17: Diffusion egg presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022051412/54937795b479593d2b8b471b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• More trials (10 if possible for each height)
• Greater range of tested heights (maybe 0.5- 5 m if possible)
Improvements