Download - Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
1/35
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, DR. JORG BUSSE, Plaintiffs,
versus Case # 2:10-cv-00390-JES-AEP
CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL;JOHN EDWIN STEELE; JENNIFER WAUGH CORINIS; A. BRIAN ALBRITTON,
Defendants.
INDEPENDENT ACTION
FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT CRIMES, CORRUPTION,AND FACIALLY FRAUDULENT WRIT OF EXECUTION
____________________________________________________________________________/
EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN DEF. DISTRICT CLERK KIM ARNETT FROM
OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, CONCEALING RECORD LACK OF WRIT OFEXECUTION
AND COERCING PLAINTIFFS TO REFRAIN FROM PROSECUTION
PUBLISHED RECORD CONCLUSIVE PUBLIC CORRUPTION & PERJURY PROOF
NOTICE OF FAKE writ,lien and FAKE 07/29/2009 judgment, CH. 55, FLA. STAT.,
AND FACIALLY FORGED judgment, DOC. # 386-5
DEF. KIM ARNETT OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE & CONCEALED FAUDULENT WRIT
1. Defendant U.S. District Court Clerk Kim Arnett is the custodian of the records of said U.S.
Court in Fort Myers, Florida.
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
2/35
2
2. Diligent search of designated records revealed no record or entry of a fraudulently pretended
writ of execution and lien, Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
3. Examination of Doc. # 425, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228 evidenced that it was null and void.
4. Here repeatedly, Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Dr. Jorg Busse had demanded certification and/or
authentication of the lack of record(s) on the publicly recorded Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-
00228.
5. Fed.R.Civ.P. 44 states:
(b) Lack of Record.
A written statement that a diligent search of designated records revealed no record or
entry of a specified tenor is admissible as evidence that the records contain no suchrecord or entry. For domestic records, the statement must be authenticated under Rule44(a)(1). For foreign records, the statement must comply with (a)(2)(C)(ii).
6. Fed.R.Civ.P. 44(a)(1) states:
Each of the following evidences an official record or an entry in it that isotherwise admissible and is kept within the United States, any state, district, orcommonwealth, or any territory subject to the administrative or judicial jurisdiction ofthe United States:(A) an official publication of the record; or(B) a copy attested by the officer with legal custody of the record or by the officer'sdeputy and accompanied by a certificate that the officer has custody. The certificatemust be made under seal:(i) by a judge of a court of record in the district or political subdivision where therecord is kept; or(ii) by any public officer with a seal of office and with official duties in the district orpolitical subdivision where the record is kept.
7. Repeatedly, said Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett refused to certify and/orauthenticate the record
absence of any writ of execution on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
8. Said Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett refused to certify and/orauthenticate the record absence of
any 07/29/2010 judgment on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
3/35
3
9. Said Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett refused to certify and/orauthenticate the record absence of
any judgment received by this Court on or around July 29, 2009, from any other Court
pursuant to the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
10. Said Defendants refusals were witnessed in said Clerks Office by Defendant U.S. Marshall
Richard Jessup, District Court staff member and/or employee Donald Johnson and Jack Primm
on Wednesday, July 14, 2010.
11. Furthermore, Defendant Kim Arnett unlawfully refused to file Plaintiffs Notice of Appeal in
Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791.
12. Said Defendant Arnett obstructed and conspired with Defendant Judge C. E. Honeywell to
obstruct Plaintiffs court access without anyjustification and authority.
13. As witnessed, said Defendant conceded and stated that she had agreed not to authenticate and
certify the evident lack of records at the direction of Defendant Judge Charlene E. Honeywell.
14. Said Def. Clerk Clerk Kim Arnett refused to make available the minutes and/or transcript of
the Hearing before Defendant corrupt Judge Honeywell in Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791.
DEFENDANT COURT REPORTED JOY STANCEL
15. Def. Court Reporter Joy Stancel refused to make available the minutes and/or transcript of the
Hearing before Defendant corrupt Judge Honeywell in Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791.
EMERGENCY OF CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL RECORD PERJURY
16. Defendant Crooked Judge Charlene E. Honeywell fraudulently concealed and agreed to
conceal that Defendant JACK N. PETERSON had perjured himself, Doc. # 432-2, Case No.
2:2007-cv-00228:
KENNETH M. WILKINSON, as Property Appraiser of Lee County, Florida, is theholder of a judgment issued by the United States of Appeals in and for the EleventhCircuit on July 29, 2009 in Docket 08-13170-BB against Appellant JORG BUSSE inthe amount of $5,048.60.
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
4/35
4
Here, said Defendant Crooked Government Officials Honeywell, Wilkinson, and Peterson
conspired with other Defendants, Judges, and Officials to fraudulently conceal the non-
existent July 29, 2009 judgment and the non-existent lien. See Ch. 55, Florida
Statutes.
CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL CLOSURE OF CASE # 08-13170-BB ON 06/11/2009
17. Here, said Defendants conspired with other Defendants to fraudulently conceal that CASE
NO. 2008-13170-BB had been CLOSED on June 11, 2009. See Appellate Docket on file.
11th Circuit Record and Exhibits had been RETURNED to this Court on 06/11/2009.
RECORD JUN 11 2009 BILL OF COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $24.30
18. The facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009 and received by the U.S.
District Court 2009 JUN 15 AM 11:20, Doc. # 365, was in the amount of$24.30, Doc. #
386, 386-3, 365; BILL OF COSTS issued on JUN 11 2009; 11th CIRCUIT FORM MISC-
12 (12/07).
19. Here, Defendant Wilkinson had never claimedmore than $24.30, and therefore under the
Rules, was neverentitledto morethan $24.30. See attached Fed. R. App. P. Here as a matter
of record, Defendant Wilkinson and/or his Attorney had sworn and/or affirmed that the
costs claimed were $24.30. See Doc. # 386-3; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
$24.30 WAS FINAL AMOUNT [FRAUDULENTLY ALLOWED]
20. The Eleventh Circuit has held that the action becomes final on the date the district court
receives the appellate court's mandate. See U.S. v. Lasteed, 832 F.2d 1240-43 (11th Cir. 1987).
HONEYWELL CONCEALED DEFENDANTS CONCOCTION OF FAKE $5,048.60
21. Here, Defendant Crooked Honeywell concealed and agreed to conceal that Defendants
Peterson and Wilkinson had concocted an amount of $5,048.60. Plaintiff Government
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
5/35
5
corruption and crime victims sued Defendants KENNETH M. WILKINSON, JACK N.
PETERSON, and CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL in theirprivate individual capacities.
RECORD EXTORTION, PUBLIC CORRUPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD
22. Under color of non-existent authority, Lee County, Florida, Defendants and Officials
fabricated and conspired to fabricate fake land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-
44-21-01-00001.0000. See Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912).
CONSPIRACY TO COVER UP & CONCEAL RECORD GOVERNMENT CRIMES
23. In these State and Federal Cases since 2006, Defendant U.S. Judges idiotically conspired with
other Officials to conceal the prima facie record forgeries of said non-existent land parcels.
See, e.g., record Transcript of corrupted proceedings before Defendant judicial whore Sheri
Polster Chappell in November 2007 on file; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
DEF. CROOK HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL 2006 STATE ACTION
24. Even though the State Court Judge himself was a Co-Defendant in this U.S. Court, Defendant
Corrupt Judges John E. Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell fraudulently concealed Plaintiffs
State Court action after said judicial Defendants themselves had removed Plaintiffs legal
action from State to Federal Court. See Case No. 2:2008-cv-00899 (BUSSE v. STATE OF
FLORIDA, Lee County Circuit Court; Def. Judge: Gerald, Lynn, Jr.).
FACIALLY FRAUDULENT 03/05/09 judgment and 06/11/09 mandate
25. In its facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009, said 11th
Circuit
fraudulently pretended and fabricated on the record, Doc. ## 365; 386:
III. Since Busses takings claim was not ripe because he had notpursued available stateremedies and he failed to adequately plead his other federal claims Id.
Here as a matter of fact and record, Busse and Prescott had pursued available state remedies
in Lee County Circuit Court [removed to this Court: 2:2008-cv-00899], adequately pleadedall
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
6/35
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
7/35
7
30. Here, Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywell had admitted to having been served and
disqualified herself. See Doc. # 3; 06/22/2010; Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390.
31. Idiotically, the Court then reassigned the Case to Co-Defendant Crooked Judge John Edwin
Steele. See Doc. # 4, 06/22/2010.
32. Here, no notice of appearance was filed on behalf of said Defendant Corrupt Judge
Honeywell. See Docket, Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390; 07/14/2009, 19:43:47.
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AGREED TO CONCEAL FORGED LAND PARCELS
33. Judges, Defendants, and Officials knew and fraudulently concealed that said facially forged
parcels had neverexistednor been legally described, conveyed, andplatted. See 1912 Plat
of Survey of private undedicated Cayo Costa Subdivision, Lee County PB 3 PG 25.
FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF 07/292009 judgment
34. Defendant crooked Officials Kenneth M. Wilkinson and Jack N. Peterson fraudulently
pretended:
11. A certified copy of the [07/29/09] judgment has been recorded in the PublicRecords of Lee County, Florida at Instrument No. 2009000309384 and serves as a lienagainst the property. See Doc. # 386, p. 3, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
Here, the non-existentjudgmentdid notserveasany lien. See Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.
35. Here, the Clerk of this U.S. District Court and custodian of said Courts records could not
authenticate the fraudulently pretended 07/29/2009 judgment, because said Clerk never
received any 07/29/2009 judgment. Here, the Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, was
devoid of any 07/29/09 judgment. See authenticated Docket on file.
36. Here, Def. U.S. Judges, Government Officials, and the other Defendants knew and agreed to
conceal that this Court had no power whatsoever to enforce a non-existentjudgment.
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
8/35
8
DEF. WILKINSON FORGED judgment, DOC. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2
37. Defendant Crooked Official Kenneth M. Wilkinson had forged, e.g., land parcels, and maps.
Here, Defendant Wilkinson perpetrated fraud on the Court and facially forged a judgment.
See Doc. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2. The smaller font size of the page number 2 did not match
font size 14 of the text. The facially forged judgment was not, and could not possibly have
been, a true copy. See Exhibit below. The facially forged and pasted judgment copy did not
comply with 55.10, Fla. Stat. E.g., said fake did not contain any address.
38. In Doc. # 432, p. 3 of 7, Defendant Wilkinson had asserted:
On February 2, 2010, the Clerk of this Court issued a Writ of Execution (D.E. 425).
39. Here, said Clerk knew that no such judgment had ever been receivedfrom the Circuit Clerk
and that no 07/29/2010 judgment appeared on the Docket, Case # 2:2007-cv-00228.
HONEYWELL CONCEALED THAT FAKE WRIT WAS VOID & NEVER WITNESSED
40. Here, Doc. # 425 Filed 02/02/10 materially misrepresented in the record absence of any
identifiable judge:
you cause to be made and levied as well a certain debt of:$Five thousand Forty-Eight AND Sixty Centsin the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, before the Judgeof the said Court by the consideration of the same Judge lately recovered against thesaid, Jorg Busse Witness the Honorable [United States Judge] ____ [blank]
Here on its face, the fraudulent writ of execution did not identify any judge and was
null and void. In particular, Witness the Honorable ___ was blank. See Doc. # 425.
DEF. WILKINSON EXTORTED MONEY AND PROPERTY
41. Defendant Wilkinson extorted fees and property by fraudulently pretending:
4. On August 22, 2008, Wilkinson filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to EleventhCircuit Rule 27-4, requesting an order awarding attorneys fees in the amount of $5,000,double costs and such other relief as the Court deemed appropriate for defendantAppellants frivolous appeal. See Doc. # 432, p. 2.
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
9/35
9
Here, Def. Wilkinson again deceived the Court, because Jorg Busse had been the Plaintiff [and
not the defendant] and Wilkinson had admittedly neverfiledany Rule 38 motion.
42. Fed.R.App.P. 27-4 states:
Repy to Response. Any reply to a response must be filed within 7 days after serviceof the response. A reply must not present matters that do not relate to the response.
Here, Def. Wilkinsons pleading(s) and brief had been without legal meritand could not be
supported by a reasonable argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law,
or the establishment of new law. In addition, Def. Wilkinsons pleadings contained assertions
of material facts that were patently clearly false and unsupported by the record, O.R.
569/875 In particular, prima facie sham claim O.R. 569/875 was not any regulation,
legislative act, resolution, or law and as a matter of law, could not have possibly divested
the Plaintiffs of their property against Plaintiffs expressly stated will. Here, the Plaintiffs had
defended their unimpeachable record title against any condemnation and refused to exchange
their perfected title just because corrupt Government Officials, e.g., threatened, harassed,
defrauded, and deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of their fundamental rights to own
property, exclude Government(s), redress their grievances of no due process and no equal
protection, and have ajury trial.
43. Here, no accountingwhatsoever, and none was ever provided as required, could have possibly
explained and/orjustified the fraudulent amount of $5,048.60 under the Rules. Here,
presenting or opposing Plaintiff(s) conclusive record evidence of Def. Wilkinsons fraud,
extortion, corruption on the record did not, and could not,possibly have incurred 5,048.60
according to the Rule.
WILKINSON FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTED REGULATORY TAKING
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
10/35
10
IN THE PRIMA FACIE RECORD ABSENCE OF ANYREGULATION:
HOW FRIVOLOUS WAS THAT?
44. Therefore here, Defendant Wilkinsons assertion of a regulatory taking was on its face
frivolous, deceptive, and fraudulent. Furthermore, Defendant Wilkinson presented his
pleadings and brief for the improper and illegal purposes of, e.g., extorting fees and property
from the Plaintiff public corruption victims, coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from further
prosecution, fraudulentlyconcealingforged land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and
07-44-21-01-00001.0000, extending and conspiringto extend extortion and fraud scheme
O.R. 569/875, obstructing justice and just speedy adjudication of Plaintiffs claims for
relief, harassing the Plaintiffs, and causing unnecessary delayand needless increase in the
cost of litigation since 2006 in State and Federal Courts over one single piece of trash paper:
facially null and void O.R. 569/875.
45. Therefore here admittedly, Defendant Wilkinson had neverfiledany Rule 38 motion, never
allegeda frivolous appeal, and neverdemanded any Rule 38 relief.
UPDATED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
46. Plaintiff public corruption victims filed another updated Criminal Complaint in this matter
with State and Federal law enforcement.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand
1. An EMERGENCY Order directing the Clerk of Court to certify and authenticate the
record lack of any writ of execution and lien on the Docket for Case No. 2:2007-cv-
00228;
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
11/35
11
2. An EMERGENCY Order directing the Clerk of Court to certify and authenticate the
record lackof any judgment received by this Court on or around July 29, 2010, on the
Docket for Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228;
3. An EMERGENCY Order directing the Clerk of Court to certify and authenticate the
record lackof any judgment [which could have become a lien] by this Court on or around
July 29, 2010, on the Docket for Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228;
4. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett from conspiring with
Defendant Richard Jessup to conceal the prima facie nullity and illegality of fake writ, Doc.
# 425, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228;
5. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett from conspiring with
Defendant C. E. Honeywell to conceal the prima facie nullity and illegality of fake writ,
Doc. # 425, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228;
6. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett from conspiring with
Defendant Court Reporter Joy Stancel to conceal the minutes of the hearing before Def. C. E.
Honeywell, Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791;
7. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywells record
EXTORTION and CORRUPTION under color of authority and prima facie scam O.R.
569/875, said fake lien, fake 07/29/09 judgment, and fake writ of execution, 55.10,
Ch. 55, 56, Fla. Stat.;
8. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining said record judicial EXTORTION and
CORRUPTION under color of non-existent O.R. 569/875, resolution 569/875, and
fraudulent regulatory taking pretenses, because as a matter of law, no law or resolution,
whatsoever, could havepossiblyalienatedPlaintiffs record property against their will;
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
12/35
12
9. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining said record EXTORTION and CORRUPTION and
embarrassingly idiotic Governmental and judicial hoax of a lien and public land claim
[see, e.g., Doc. ## 213; 214; 212, Case No. 2:09-cv-00791; and Case No. 2:07-cv-00228, Doc.
## 288, 282, 425, 386, 365].
10. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Def. objectively partial/crooked Judge Honeywell,
and Defendants Jack N. Peterson, and Kenneth M. Wilkinson from perverting the record &
concealing Plaintiffs record ownership of Lot 15A, PB 3, PG 25 (1912);
11. An EMERGENCY orderrelieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent judgment, orders, and
proceedings of record such as, e.g., Doc. ## 48, 49; and Doc. ## 210, 212, 213, 214, Case No.
2:09-cv-00791 at the dirty hands of Def. judicial whore Honeywell for said well-proven
reasons;
12. An EMERGENCY orderrelieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent concealment of their
State action, 2006-CA-003185, Lee County Circuit Court, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA;
13. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not fabricate a lien and did not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs record ownership of said Lot
15A, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as evidenced in Plaintiffs Complaint and pleadings;
14. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel #
12-44-20-01-00015.015A as affirmed by the public record;
15. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not maliciously pervert the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs record ownership by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 11th
Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed.
Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
13/35
13
16. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did
not capriciously conceal Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel #
12-44-20-01-00015.015A, which the Defendants Lee County had asserted before the 11th
Circuit U.S. Appellate Court, Appeal # 08-13170, BUSSE v. LEE COUNTY;
17. An Ordercompelling Defendant Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why her rulings were not
NULL AND VOID and procured through the criminal scheme of false frivolity and
vexatiousness pretenses and the concealment of said fake legal descriptions, fake land
parcels, and fake Government ownership claims and contentions;
18. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell, because she
disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants, perverted the facts
of record, and could not possibly be trusted to be impartial and fair, 28 U.S.C. 455; 28
U.S.C. 144.
/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT
Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff,pro seP.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295____________________________________/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.
Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff,pro seState Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;[email protected]
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
14/35
14
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
15/35
15
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
16/35
16
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
17/35
The World of Jimmy Star Publications Inc.1940 E Sunrise Blvd
Fort Lauderdale FL 33304
+1 954.828.9979 Call [email protected]
www.wojspubs.com
CONTACT: Jimmy Star, +1 954.828.9979, [email protected]
For Immediate ReleaseRe: Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) v. Gil Eriksen
Properties LLC; Case No. 06-004169 (21)
THERES A NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN - GRAND JURY
INVESTIGATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA CORRUPTION
UNDERWAY
Pompano Beach, FL, May 18, 2010 A long history of untold corruption in
South Florida is starting to be exposed. The illegal taking of private property by
the Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency under the guise of
'eminent domain' while not actually having the right of eminent domain to seize
property, and the complicity of Broward County as a whole in the land grab scam
that has irreparably damaged countless citizens and businesses for the nefarious
profit of the rich and powerful is but one of the abuses of public office being
revealed.
There is a 'new sheriff in town' by way of an anti-corruption grand jury that
has been convened to investigate South Florida's public officials. Governor Crist
requested the Florida Supreme Court empanel the 12-month 19th Grand Jury on
Public Corruption as in recent months FBI investigations have exposed an entire
wave of criminality in the highest seats of South Florida government. Judge Victor
Tobin is presiding over the grand jury and jurors have been chosen from multiple
South Florida districts. Victims of corrupt officials are pleased at the prospect of a
real investigation into the good ole boy (and girl) networks tied to big business and
racketeering that have taken over government at the expense of the people.
Recently a hand-appointed member of the Advisory Board to the Pompano
Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, Vincente Thrower, was arrested forbribery and unlawful compensation for misusing his position and making deals
with developers and money lenders. Thrower's appointment to that advisory board
was made by current Commissioner and CRA member, Woodrow Poitier, who
himself has also faced FBI investigation in his past position as chairman of the
city's public housing agency who 'misused' one million dollars in federal funding
meant for low-income housing programs. The Pompano Beach City Attorney
1 of 2
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
18/35
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
19/35
17
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
20/35
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
21/35
19
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
22/35
20
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
23/35
21
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
24/35
22
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
25/35
23
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
26/35
24
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
27/35
25
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
28/35
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
29/35
27
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
30/35
28
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
31/35
29
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
32/35
30
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
33/35
31
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
34/35
32
-
8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1
35/35