![Page 1: Data Without Boundaries: Case study of CIS usage](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071806/55cf914b550346f57b8c4ab3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES TO INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM FRANCE,
NETHERLANDS AND CROATIA
Coordination : Roxane SilbermanCNRS/Réseau Quetelet
Presented by Mirjana Pejic-Bach /Faculty of Economics & Business – Zagreb, University of Zagreb
Location, Event, Date
![Page 2: Data Without Boundaries: Case study of CIS usage](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071806/55cf914b550346f57b8c4ab3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Specific Research• Research question: Are there any differences between Croatia, France and
Netherlands regarding the impact of information sources for innovation activities to R&D activities of the firm?
• Dependent variables: R&D internal and R&D external (binary variables)• Explanatory variables: Firm, Suppliers, Customers, Competitors, Consultants,
Universities, Government, Conferences, trade fairs and exhibitions as sources for innovation activities (binary variables)
• Control variables: Size, Group, Size of the market, Funding for innovation and Industry (numeric and binary variables)
• Method: We specified logistic distributions and maximized the log-likelihood of the logit models (Greene, 2003) to estimate models’ parameters up to a positive constant.
• Results: Overall, we may conclude that choices for innovation sources have varying effect on R&D performance from one country to another.
![Page 3: Data Without Boundaries: Case study of CIS usage](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071806/55cf914b550346f57b8c4ab3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Data Used• The data are derived from cross-sectional survey called ‘Community Innovation
Survey’ (CIS8) which covers the period from 2006 to 2008 and is based on the Oslo Manual drawn up by the OECD.
• The Community Innovation Survey is the result of a significant increase in the importance given to innovation issues at the EU level.
• We use CIS8 from three countries, France, Netherlands and Croatia.
Country Source Sample
Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 3,333
France Ministry of Economics, Finances and Industry
19,901
Netherlands Statistics Netherlands 10,612
![Page 4: Data Without Boundaries: Case study of CIS usage](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071806/55cf914b550346f57b8c4ab3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Obstacles and Suppport
Research-related obstacles
Data-related obstacles
Situational obstacles
• Model (in advance)• Software (e.g. SAS)
• META data (in advance)• Country differences (e.g.
industry classification)
• Time constraints (travelling, researching)
• Financial constraints travelling, dana costs)
𝑆𝑢𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠= 𝑓 (𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 ,𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 , 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡 )
Institutional Support
• Researcher’s institution
• Data providing institution
• DWB• Centrum voor
Beleidsstatistiek• Faculty of
Economics & Business – Zagreb