Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Initial Layout Construction
• Preliminaries– From-To Chart / Flow-Between chart
– REL Chart
– Layout Scores
• Traditional Layout Construction
• Manual CORELAP Algorithm
• Graph-Based Layout Construction– REL Graph, REL Diagram, Planar Graph
– Layout Graph, Block Layout
– Heuristic Algorithm to Construct a REL Graph
– General Procedure
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
From-To and Flow-Between Charts
Given M activities, a From-To Chart
represents M(M-1) asymmetric quantitative
relationships.
Example:
where
fij = material flow from activity i to activity j.
A Flow-Between Chart represents
M(M-1)/2 symmetric quantitative
relationships, i.e.,
gij = fij + fji, for all i > j,
where
gij = material flow between activities i and j.
f12 f13
f23
f32
f21
f31
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Relationship (REL) Chart
A Relationship (REL) Chart represents
M(M-1)/2 symmetric qualitative
relationships, i.e.,
where
rij {A, E, I, O, U}: Closeness Value (CV) between activities i and j; rij is an ordinal value.
A number of factors other than material
handling flow (cost) might be of primary
concern in layout design.
rij values when comparing pairs of activities:
A = absolutely necessary 5 %
E = especially important 10 %
I = important 15 %
O = ordinary closeness 20 %
U = unimportant 50 %
X = undesirable 5 %
V(rij) = arbitrary cardinal value assigned to rij, e.g., V(U) = 1, etc.
r12
r13
r23
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Adjacency
• Two activities are (fully) adjacent in a layout if they share a common border of positive lenght, i.e., not just a point.
• Two activities are partially adjacent in a layout if they only share one or a finite number of points, i.e., zero length.
• Let aij [0, 1]: adjacency coefficient between activities i and j.
• Example: (Fully) adjacent: a12 = a13 = a24 = a34 = a45 = 1,
Partially adjacent: a14 = a23 = a25 = , and
Non-adjacent: a15 = a25 = 0.
.adjacentnotaretheyif
and,adjacentpartiallyaretheyif)10(
,adjacentarejandiactivitiesif
0
1
a ij
3
1 2
4 5
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Layout Scores
Two ways of computing layout scores:
• Layout score based on distance:
where dij = distance between activities i and j.
• Layout score based on adjacency:
where aij [0, 1]: adjacency coefficient between activities i and j.
1M
1i
M
1ijijij
d d)r(VLS
1M
1i
M
1ijijij
a a)r(VLS
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Traditional Layout Configuration
• An Activity Relationship Diagram is developed from information in the activity relation chart. Essentially the relationship diagram is a block diagram of the various areas to be placed into the layout.
• The departments are shown linked together by a number of lines. The total number of lines joining departments reflects the strength of the relationship between the departments. E.g., four joining lines indicate a need to have two departments located close together, whereas one line indicates a low priority on placing the departments adjacent to each other.
• The next step is to combine the relationship diagram with departmental space requirements to form a Space Relationship Diagram. Here, the blocks are scaled to reflect space needs while still maintaining the same relative placement in the layout.
• A Block Plan represents the final layout based on activity relationship information. If the layout is for an existing facility, the block plan may have to be modified to fit the building. In the case of a new facility, the shape of the building will confirm to layout requirements.
A Rating
E Rating
I Rating
O Rating
U Rating
X Rating
Legend
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example
Code Reason
1 Flow of material
2 Ease of supervision
3 Common personnel
4 Contact Necessary
5 Conveniences
Rating Definition
A Absolutely Necessary
E Especially Important
I Important
O Ordinary Closeness OK
U Unimportant
X Undesirable
1. Offices
2. Foreman
3. Conference Room
4. Parcel Post
5. Parts Shipment
6. Repair and Service Parts
7. Service Areas
8. Receiving
9. Testing
10. General Storage
O
4
I
5
U
U
U
E
3
U
U
E
3
E
5
O
4
U
O
4
U
U
E
3
A
1
O
3
I
2
U
U
U
I
4
U
U
I
2
U
U
U
U
U
I
2
U
U
A
1
U
O
2
U
I
1
U
I
2
U
U
I
2
U
REL chart:
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (Cont.)
10
5 8 7
9 6
4 2 3
1Activity Relationship
Diagram
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (Cont.)
2(125)
Space RelationshipDiagram
3(125)
1(1000)
4(350)
6(75)
9(500)
10(1750)
5(500)
8(200)
7(575)
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Manual CORELAP Algorithm
• CORELAP is a construction algorithm to create an activity relationship (REL) diagram or block layout from a REL chart.
• Each department (activity) is represented by a unit square.
• Numerical values are assigned to CV’s:
V(A) = 10,000, V(O) = 10,
V(E) = 1,000, V(U) = 1,
V(I) = 100, V(X) = -10,000.
• For each department, the Total Closeness Rating (TCR) is the sum of the absolute values of the relationships with other departments.
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Procedure to Select Departments
1. The first department placed in the layout is the one with the greatest TCR value. I|f a tie
exists, choose the one with more A’s.
2. If a department has an X relationship with he first one, it is placed last in the layout. If a
tie exists, choose the one with the smallest TCR value.
3. The second department is the one with an A relationship with the first one. If a tie exists,
choose the one with the greatest TCR value.
4. If a department has an X relationship with he second one, it is placed next-to-the-last or
last in the layout. If a tie exists, choose the one with the smallest TCR value.
5. The third department is the one with an A relationship with one of the placed departments.
If a tie exists, choose the one with the greatest TCR value.
6. The procedure continues until all departments have been placed.
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Procedure to Place Departments
• Consider the figure on the right. Assume that a department is placed in the middle (position 0). Then, if another department is placed in position 1, 3, 5 or 7, it is “fully adjacent” with the first one. It is placed in position 2, 4, 6 or 8, it is “partially adjacent”.
8 7 6
5
432
1 0
• For each position, Weighted Placement (WP) is the sum of the numerical values for all pairs of adjacent departments.
• The placement of departments is based on the following steps:
1. The first department selected is placed in the middle.
2. The placement of a department is determined by evaluating all possible locations
around the current layout in counterclockwise order beginning at the “western edge”.
3. The new department is located based on the greatest WP value.
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example
1. Receiving
2. Shipping
3. Raw Materials Storage
4. Finished Goods Storage
5. Manufacturing
6. Work-In-Process Storage
7. Assembly
8. Offices
9. Maintenance
A A
E O
U U
A O
E
E
E
A
A
X
X
A U
U
A
O
O
A
O
A
O
U
E
A
U
E
U
E
A U
O
A
1. Receiving
2. Shipping
3. Raw Materials Storage
4. Finished Goods Storage
5. Manufacturing
6. Work-In-Process Storage
7. Assembly
8. Offices
9. Maintenance
CV values:V(A) = 125V(E) = 25V(I) = 5V(O) = 1V(U) = 0V(X) = -125
Partial adjacency: = 0.5
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Table of TCR Values
Department SummaryDept.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A E I O U XTCR Order
123456789
- A A E O U U A O A - E A U O U E A A E - E A U U E A E A E - E O A E U U O A E - A A O A U O U O A - A O O U U U A A A - X A A E E E O O X - X O U A U A O A X -
3 1 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 1 3 0 3 3 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 1 1 0 4 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 4 2 0 4 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 2 2 1
402301450351527254625452502
(5)(7)(4)(6)(2)(8)(1)(9)(3)
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (cont.)
7
125
125
125 125
62.5 62.5
62.562.5
7 125
62.5 62.5
62.5187.5
5125
62.5 187.5
187.5 187.5
7 0
62.5 0
5
187.5
187.5
9187.5
62.5 125 62.5
0
62.5125
7 0
125.5 0
5
1.59126.5
0.5 1 0.5
0
163.5
3125
62.5
62.5
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (cont.)
7 1255
137.59
25 0
100
337.5
37.5
12.5
1
12.5 12.5
62.5
62.5137.537.5
7
125
5
9
125
12.5
387.5
137.5
12.5
1
62.5 125
62.5
0025
4
125 62.5
75
9
1
125
31
0
1
1 1.5
125
188
4
1.5 0.5
21
0.5
0.5
63.5
62.562.5
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (cont.)
75
9
75
-60.5
3112.5
1
87.5 -62.5
-112
4
-37.5 12.5
225
12.5
12.5
-37.5
-61.525.5 612.5
0.5 10.5 0.5
75
9
3
1 42
6
8
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Planar Graph
• Assumption:
• A Planar Graph is a graph that can be drawn in two dimensions with no arc crossing.
.otherwise
,adjacentfullyarejandiactivitiesif
0
1a ij
NonplanarPlanar
• A graph is nonplanar if it contains either one of the two Kuratowski graphs:
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Relationship (REL) Graph
• Given a (block) layout with M activities, a corresponding planar undirected graph, called the Relationship (REL) Graph, can always be constructed.
REL Graph
1 2
543
6(Exterior)
1 2
543
Block Layout
• A REL graph has M+1 nodes (one node for each activity and a node for the exterior of the layout. The exterior can be considered as an additional activity. The arcs correspond to the pairs of activities that are adjacent.
• A REL graph corresponding to a layout is planar because the arcs connecting two adjacent activities can always be drawn passing through their common border of positive length.
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Relationship (REL) Diagram
• A Relationship (REL) Diagram is also an undirected graph, generated from the REL diagram, but it is in general nonplanar.
• A REL diagram, including the U closeness values, has M(M-1)/2 arcs. Since a planar graph can have at most 3M-6 arcs, a REL diagram will be nonplanar if M(M-1)/2 > 3M-6.
M(M-1)/2 > 3M-6 M 5.
• A REL graph is a subgraph of the REL diagram.
• For M 5, at most 3M-6 out of M(M-1)/2 relationships can be satisfied through adjacency in a REL graph.
An upper bound on LSa, LSaUB, is the sum of the 3M-6 longest V(rij)’s.
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Maximally Planar Graph (MPG)
• A planar graph with exactly 3M-6 arcs is called Maximally Planar Graph (MPG).
Not MPG sincehas only 5 arcs(5 < 6 = 3M-6)
MPG sincehas 6 arcs
• The interior faces of a graph are the bounded regions formed by its arcs, and its exterior face is the unbounded region formed by its outside arcs.
IF1 IF2
IF3
EF The tetrahedron has three interior faces (IF1, IF2 and IF3) and an exterior face (EF)
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Maximally Planar Graph (MPG)
• The interior faces and the exterior face of an MPG are triangular, i.e., the faces are formed by three arcs.
Not triangularNot an MPG
• The REL graph of a given a (block) layout may not be an MPG.
Layout REL Graph
Not an MPG
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Maximally Planar Weighted Graph (MPWG)
• An MPG whose sum of arc weights is as large as any other possible MPG is called a Maximally Planar Weighted Graph (MPWG).
• Using the V(rij)’s as arc weights, a REL graph that is a MPWG has the maximum possible LSa, close to LSa
UB.
• Since it is difficult to find an MPWG, a Heuristic (non-optimal) procedure will be used to construct a REL graph that is an MPG, but may not be an MPWG (although its LSa will be close to LSa
UB).
• The Layout Graph is the dual of the REL graph.
• Given a graph G, its dual graph GD has a node for each face of G and two nodes in GD are connected with an arc if the two corresponding faces in G share an arc.
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Layout Graph
• Example.
• The number of nodes in G (primal graph) is the same than the number of faces in GD (dual graph), and vice versa. In addition,
(GD)D = G.
• Primal Graph is Planar Dual Graph is planar.
G GD
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Layout Graph (Cont.)
• Given a layout, the corresponding layout graph can always be constructed by placing the nodes at the corners of the layout where three or more activities meet (including the exterior of the layout as an activity). The arcs in the graph are the remaining portions of the layout walls. E.g.,
Layout Graph
1 2
54
3
(Exterior)
• Given a REL graph (RG), its corresponding layout graph (LG) is LG = RGD. E.g.,
Layout
c g
a b
d f
e
h
1 2
54
3
6
RG LG
RGD
LGD
Only activity 3 and exterior meet here
Activities 3, 5, and exterior meet here
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Layout Graph (Cont.)
• If LG is given, then RG = LGD, but for layout construction, the layout is not known initially, so LG cannot be constructed without RG.
• If a planar REL graph (primal graph) exist, the corresponding layout graph (dual graph) is also planar. Therefore, it is possible theorectically to construct a block layout that will satisfy all the adjacency requirements. In practice, this is not straightforward because the space requirements of the activities are difficult to handle.
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example
Space Requirements:
Dept. Area
A 300
B 200
C 100
D 200
E 100
F (exterior)
REL graph (Primal graph):
A B
C D
F G
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (Cont.)
Layout graph (Dual graph):
A B
C D
F G
1
2
3
4
5
7
6
8
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (Cont.)
• A corner point is a point where at least three departments meet, including the exterior department.
• Note that each corner point in the block layout corresponds to a node in the layout graph. In the first block layout, each corner point is defined by “exactly” three departments. In this case, there is a one-to-one correspondence between corner points and nodes in the layout graph. In the square block layout, there are two corner points defined by four departments, i.e., (A, B, C, D) and (B, D, E, F). Each of these two corner points corresponds to two nodes in the layout graph.
Block Layout:Square Block Layout:(areas are not considered)
A
D
BC
E
8 1 6
7 2 3 4
5
A
D
B
C
E
7
8
8 4
1 52 3
F
F
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Heuristic Procedure to Construct a Relationship Graph
1. Rank activities in non-increasing order of TCRk, k = 1, …,M, where
TCRk =
(Note that the negative values of V(rik) and V(rkj) are not included in TCRk).
2. Form a tetrahedron using activities 1 to 4 (i.e., the activities with the four largest TCRk‘s).
3. For k = 5, …, M, insert activity k into the face with the maximum sum of weights (V(r ij))
of k with the three nodes defining the face (where “insert” refers to connecting the inserted
node to the three nodes forming the face with arcs).
4. Insert (M+1)th node into the exterior face of the REL graph.
M ax {0 , V (r )} M ax {0 , V (r )} .iki 1
k -1
k jj= k +1
M
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example
O
I O
A
X
U
U
O
U U
E E
A
B
C
D
E
F
I
E
E
CV values:
V(A) = 81
V(E) = 27
V(I) = 9
V(O) = 3
V(U) = 1
V(X) = -243
REL chart:
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Table of TCR Values
Department SummaryDept.
A B C D E F A E I O U XTCR Order
A - I O I O A 1 0 2 2 0 0 105 2
B I - X U U E 0 1 1 0 2 1 38 5
C O X - U E E 0 2 0 1 1 1 58 3
D I U U - U E 0 1 1 0 3 0 39 4
E O U E U - O 0 1 0 2 2 0 35 6
F A E E E O - 1 3 0 1 0 0 165 1
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (Cont.)
Step 2:
A
C
F D
A
O
E U
E
I = rAD V(rAD) = 9
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (Cont.)
Step 3: Insert B.
A
C
F D
EF
IF1 IF2
IF3
I
I I
EE
E
U
U
U
X X
X
Face LSa
EF 9 + 1 + 27 = 37 *
IF1 9 + 27 - 243 = -207
IF2 9 - 243 + 1 = -233
IF3 27 - 243 + 1 = -215
Insert B in EF
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (Cont.)
Step 3 (Cont.): Insert B.
A
C
F D
BIF1
IF2 IF3
IF4
IF5
EF
Face LSa
EF 5
IF1 7
IF2 33 *
IF3 31
IF4 31
IF5 5
Insert E in IF2
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (Cont.)
Step 4: Call exterior activity EX.
A
C
F D
B EX
E
Since arcs (AB), (BD), and (DA) are the outsidearcs, EX connects to nodes A, B, and D.
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (Cont.)
• LSaUB is the sum of the 3M - 6 ( 3 6 - 6 = 12), largest V(rij)’s.
In the last example,
LSaUB = V(rAF) + V(rBF) + V(rCE) + V(rCF) + V(rDF) + V(rAB) + V(rAD) + V(rAC)
+ V(rAE) + V(rEF) + V(rBD) + V(rBE) = 81 + 27 + 27 + 27 + 27 + 9 + 9 + 3
+ 3 + 3 + 1 + 1 = 218.
• For the final REL graph, LSa = 218.
• LSaUB = LSa The final REL graph is an MPWG It is optimal.
• LSaUB > LSa The final REL graph may not be an MPWG It may not be optimal.
• Using the Heuristic procedure, the generated REL graph will always be an MPG since each face is triangular.
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
General Procedure for Graph Based Layout Construction
1. Given the REL chart, use the Heuristic procedure to construct the REL graph.
2. Construct the layout graph by taking the dual of the REL graph, letting the facility
exterior node of the REL graph be in the exterior face of the layout graph.
3. Convert (by hand) the layout graph into an initial layout taking into consideration the
space requirement of each activity.
REL Chart REL Graph Layout Graph Initial Layout
Space Requirements
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example
Step 1: (from before)
A
C
F D
B EX
E
REL Graph
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (Cont.)
Step 2: take the dual of RG
C
FD
EX
E
A
B
Layout Graph
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Example (Cont.)
Step 3:
• Initial layout is drawn
as a square, but could
be any other shape.
• Only A and B are
nonrectangular.
B D
A
F
E C
Initial Layout
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Comments
1. If an activity is desired to be adjacent to the exterior of a facility (e.g., a shipping/receiving department), then the exterior could be included in the REL chart and treated as a normal activity, making sure that, in step 1 of the general procedure, its node is one of the nodes forming the exterior face of the REL graph.
2. The area of each interior face of the layout graph constructed in step 2 does not correspond to the space requirements of its activity.
3. In step 3, the overall shape of the initial layout should be usually be rectangular if it corresponds to an entire building because rectangular buildings are usually cheaper to build; even if the initial layout corresponds to just a department, a rectangular shape would still be preferred, if possible.
4. In step 3, the shape of each activity in the initial layout should be rectangular if possible, or at most L- or T-shaped (e.g., activities A and B), because rectangular shapes require less wall space to enclose and provide more layout possibilities in interiors as compared to other shapes.
Copyright © 1999. Created by Jose Ventura for the College-Industry Council for Material Handling Education
Comments (Cont.)
5. All shapes should be orthogonal, i.e., all corners are either 90 or 270 (e.g., a triangle is not an orthogonal shape since its corners could all be 60).
6. In step 1, if the LSa of the REL graph is less than LSaUB, then the REL graph may not be
optimal. The following three steps may improve the REC graph for the purpose of increasing LSa:
a) Edge Replacement: replace an arc in the REL graph with a new arc not previously in the graph, without losing planarity, if it increases LSa.
b) Vertex Relocation: move a node in the REL graph connected to three arcs to another triangular face if it increases LSa.
c) Use a different activity to replace one of the four activities of the tetrahedron formed in step 2 of the Heuristic procedure to construct a new REL graph.