Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
Project: Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works
Document No: SMCSWTSE‐JCG‐SPS‐TM‐PLN‐002285
DOCUMENT APPROVAL REVISION DATE PREPARED
BY REVIEWED BY
APPROVED BY
REMARKS
A 13 May 18 S Lewis . Internal review
B 23 May 18 S Lewis J Glasgow T Ferrero External review
C 19 June 18 S Lewis J Glasgow T Ferrero For approval
D 25 Sept 18 S Lewis B Saeheng J Glasgow Change to parking restriction on Pitt St – for approval
Signature:
E 29 June 20 D Mc Garry Update for completion date
�������� ������� ���� ������ ��� ��� ������� ����������� ��� ��� � ��� ������ �������������������������� ��!���"
��� #���$$$%�&'#$��!()�'*��%+�(��!(,�'*�������!�-��.��)�!�-/��!�-0��$%!# 12(!�-,�13�4� �'�!�-3��5�6�4�+7�83���&&��+ ���) ���� !&5" ���
���9:;:<=>�?@<<:AB@;C:;D: ��E:F:<:;D:�G@H ������ ��� ��� ������I<@J:DK�LMK>:H �8*'�8����������8�4���N��$�#�� ���OPQHR<MS�E:F�G@H ������ ��� �T��� ��������O=K:H ����N-8�����U�������V� E:AB@;A:�<:WXM<:C�YZH�[<@\H ]N!+���'���V��̂��!*#�!'*��!����(�����_�+�#�̂ !����&�&���*�_�#��'̀`�L@H /�+-!'��+.!��8��̂���'�a�--!'*���,����--!��0̀�b��!�-���--!��̂��!*#�!'*��!����(�����_�+�#�̂ !����&&���*�_�#��'̀ �̀b��!c����-�#��̂�8*'�8�����*�'!���'��&&�+�̀�b����_!''8��!(���d��̂�8*'�8����*�'!���'��&&�+�̀�b����_��,��$'��̂�8*'�8�����*�'!���'��&&�+�̀�b��-.!�7��c�-�#��̂�8*'�8������̀���?DH V)*N--!��7�!'��̂���'�a�--!'*���,����--!��0̀���eXYJ:DKH EfH�eQ?egLefhi?9heIehLQhIPGhjjkklmhf�IMKK�eK<::K�G@<Kn�eMK:�RB:<=KM@;A�h�LFGeg�oF@<\:<EQep�=BB<@q=>�?@;K<=DK�G@H � ���?>=AAMFMD=KM@;H/�+-!'U�����!'*�&������!�����8*'�8��-!''�'.�4����.�!(#�̂����4�̀��!_����_��$�*�����N *!��*������������������������ ��!���'#�������_��%�����!#�!*_�#�*��&��������'*��#�(�'���&�������_�#�*�#N)(�##��'%�V++��*�'.-8U�&�������4���#�#!��#&��*����!*� ��r������ ��� ��� � ��� ������ ������������������������� ��!���'#s�!#�����! ��_�*����U�$����!--� ��_��N#�s��'*����'#��&�V ��_!-s�N �������#���_�#��'�#��--�)��'.�! -�+!)-�%��-.!� �t��!_��+� ��*�8�N��'����#�+����# �'*�'+��!#�8�N��!_���!c�'��_���&��(�,���'����*�'%���.!�*#U��'����OMADMB>M;:H��.�#��+#��!'!.�(�'� u<:=H P@D=KM@;H����������������������vvvvv�wxyzy{|}�~���|z��vvvvv��?@;K<=DK@<�9:;:<=>�?@<<:AB@;C:;D: �
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 2 of 21
Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4
1.1. Project Overview ......................................................................................................... 4
1.2. Purpose of this Plan .................................................................................................... 4
2. Locality and existing conditions ............................................................................... 5
2.1. Castlereagh Street ...................................................................................................... 5
2.2. Park Street .................................................................................................................. 5
2.3. Pitt Street ..................................................................................................................... 6
3. Site Operations ............................................................................................................ 6
3.1. Works Required ........................................................................................................... 6
3.2. Operating Conditions ................................................................................................... 7
4. Fleet Management ....................................................................................................... 9
4.1. Haulage Routes ........................................................................................................... 9
4.2. Permits/ Over Dimensional Vehicles ......................................................................... 10
4.3. Drivers and Operators ............................................................................................... 10
5. Other Considerations ............................................................................................... 11
5.1. Road Safety Audits .................................................................................................... 11
5.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast ............................................................................................. 11
5.3. Police and Emergency Services ................................................................................ 11
5.4. Communications and the community ........................................................................ 11
5.5. Inspections and monitoring ....................................................................................... 12
5.6. Environmental Maintenance ...................................................................................... 13
5.7. Site Contacts ............................................................................................................. 13
Appendix 1 Parking restrictions ........................................................................................ 14
Appendix 2 Current and proposed site operations ......................................................... 15
Appendix 3 Traffic control plans ....................................................................................... 16
Appendix 4 Haulage routes ................................................................................................ 18
Appendix 5 EIS Excerpt ...................................................................................................... 19
Appendix 6 Road safety audit ............................................................................................ 20
Appendix 7 Review comments .......................................................................................... 21
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 3 of 21
Figures Figure 1: Sydney Metro Project ................................................................................................ 4
Figure 2: Pitt Street north site ................................................................................................... 5
Figure 3 EIS Haulage routes .................................................................................................. 10
Tables Table 1 Peak vehicle movements per hour .............................................................................. 7
Table 2 Proposed Communications ....................................................................................... 11
Table 3: Stakeholder consultation .......................................................................................... 12
Table 4: Site contacts ............................................................................................................. 13
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 4 of 21
1. Introduction
1.1. Project Overview
The Sydney Metro is Australia’s biggest public transport project. The metro project currently consists of:
Stage one is the Sydney Metro Northwest, formerly the North West Rail Link,connecting the north western suburbs of Sydney, through to Chatswood.
Stage two is the City & South West project linking Chatswood through to Sydenham. Stage three includes the upgrade of the existing rail line between Sydenham and
Bankstown.
Figure 1 shows the proposed Sydney Metro project and stages.
Figure 1: Sydney Metro Project
1.2. Purpose of this Plan
The purpose of this Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP): PITT STREET STATION NORTH SITE OPERATIONS is to detail the site operations and demobilisation for this phase of the Sydney Metro City & South West project. This plan will set out the traffic management initiatives that will be deployed to minimise disruption to and ensure the safety of the wide range of stakeholders potentially affected by the works, including but not limited to: motorists, pedestrians; cyclists; public transport users, local residents and property owners; business owners; and workers/staff engaged on the Project.
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 5 of 21
2. Locality and existing conditions
The Pitt Street Station north site is bounded by Pitt Street to the west, 250 Pitt Street / Castlereagh Boutique Hotel on Castlereagh Street to the north, Castlereagh Street to the east and Park Street to the south. The site is shown in Figure 2 below in red. The existing parking restrictions at the site are detailed below and are also included in Appendix 1.
Figure 2: Pitt Street north site
2.1. Castlereagh Street
Castlereagh Street is a local road which connects Hunter Street to Hay street in the Haymarket area. Castlereagh Street is one way southbound its entire length. A speed limit of 40km/hr is in place. With the closure of George Street for the light rail, Castlereagh Street is a major thoroughfare for buses to the inner west of Sydney.
No Stopping restrictions exist from Park Street for approximately 30m north of the intersection. North of this No Parking exists and continues further north to cover the Castlereagh Boutique Hotel frontage. This No Parking area is used by the Hotel for their guests, as noted in their EIS submissions.
The effective width of the footpath is 2.9m (property boundary to face of kerb is 3.7m with .8m allocated to street furniture. There are no cycling facilities on this section of Castlereagh Street. A bus lane exists on Castlereagh Street which can be used by cyclists.
Signalised pedestrian crossings exist on all legs at the intersection of Park Street.
Castlereagh Street is located within the CBD Tow away zone.
2.2. Park Street
Park Street is an unclassified regional road and is primarily under the control of local council. Park Street commences at George Street to the west and ceases at College Street. To the
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 6 of 21
west of George Street, Park Street is renamed Druitt Street and to the east of College Street, the street is renamed William Street. The speed limit on Park Street is 40km/hr due to the high pedestrian activity. Park Street is buses only between George Street and Pitt Street in the eastbound direction only.
A bus stop is located on Park Street between Pitt and Castlereagh streets, on the eastbound carriageway along the frontage of the site. This bus stop services the following routes: 311, 324 and 325. The first bus at this stop is 5.45AM with the last service being at 1:25AM except for Friday night/ Saturday morning with an extra service at 2:25AM.
To the east of the bus stop, near the intersection of Castlereagh Street an unmetered loading zone is in operation between 6AM-6PM M-F, with No Parking restrictions outside of these hours.
To the east of the loading zone, a No Stopping Australia Post Vehicles excepted is installed covering approximately 6m. From this zone to the intersection of Castlereagh Street is No Stopping restrictions.
The existing footpaths are approximately 4m wide. There are no cycling facilities on this section of Park Street, however, by regulations, the existing Bus Lane can be used by cyclists. Signalised pedestrian crossings exist on all legs at the intersections of Pitt Street and Castlereagh Street.
2.3. Pitt Street
Pitt Street is classified as a local road. It commences at Central Station to the south and ends at Circular Quay. The section of Pitt Street between Park and Market streets is one way northbound. The speed limit on Pitt Street is 40km/hr due to high pedestrian activity in this area.
No bus stops or routes exist on this section of Pitt Street.
No Stopping 7AM-6PM M-F and 7AM-1PM Sat with the spaces reverting to 4P parking (6PM-10PM M-F, 1PM-10PM SAT, 8AM-10PM SUN &PH).
There is no on road cycling facility. The footpaths are typically 3m which widen out at intersections. Signalised pedestrian crossings exist on all legs at its intersection with Park Street.
3. Site Operations
Duration: 25 months Timing: July 2018 to December 2020
3.1. Works Required
Works to be completed internally during this phase is the excavation of the station box, pedestrian adits and the subsequent demobilisation. Works will be required at the end of excavation to decommission driveways, where not required for the follow-on contractors and removal of infrastructure, such as acoustic shed and water treatment plant
External works will see changes to the existing hoarding to facilitate capping beam works within the site. This work will involve the installation of Class A hoarding in lieu of the Class B hoarding, as described in the Pitt Street North Site Establishment CTMP (SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002284). At the completion of tunnelling works and prior to the site footprint being excavated, the hoarding along Pitt Street will be revised to Class B hoarding. This change to hoarding will occur at night with pedestrian diversions in place.
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 7 of 21
Access and egress for all spoil operations are proposed from Castlereagh Street. This access/ egress arrangement will utilise the previously approved access/ egress points. The current parking restrictions will be retained along the site frontages. A light vehicle access/ egress and heavy vehicle access will be located on Pitt Street, refer to Appendix 2.
Excavation works will occur 24/7.
Works include:
Removal of excavated and other material from site Capping beam works including adjustments/ removal/ replacement of hoarding Concreting works Site hoarding removal Equipment installation Demobilisation of site
3.2. Operating Conditions
The main access/ egress is proposed on Castlereagh Street using existing driveways, that previously serviced the demolition works in Stage 1 CTMP for DELTA and the site establishment works undertaken as part of CTMP SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002284. The use of the Pitt Street driveway will be for heavy and light vehicle access once the bridging structure is in place (refer to Site Establishment CTMP) The use of the Pitt Street egress will be for light vehicles only. There will be approximately 7,500 trucks per month, during peak periods with 250 trucks per day. This peak period will last for approximately 5 months from early 2019. Outside of that peak period, truck numbers average 60 trucks per day. There will be minimal truck numbers during the peak periods (AM and PM).
Table 1 provides a comparison of the EIS and TSE peak traffic at the site.
Table 1 Peak vehicle movements per hour
TIME EIS LIGHT VEHICLES
TSE LIGHT VEHICLES
EIS HEAVY VEHICLES
TSE HEAVY VEHICLES
0700-1000 2-10 2-10 6 6
1000-1200 10 10 24 24
1200-1400 10 10 24 24
1400-1600 10 10 6-24 24
1600-1800 2 2 6 6
1800-0700 2 2 6 6
3.2.1. Impact on Traffic Flows
The operation of the site will have an impact on the surrounding street system, however, it is recognised that the traffic generation is well below the EIS numbers. Heavy vehicles will be restricted to right in/ right out on Castlereagh Street and right in only on Pitt Street. Deliveries will be undertaken outside of peak hours, where the delivery vehicle is unable to enter site via the nominated vehicular crossing, refer to Section 3.2.
As noted in the EIS Road Network Performance, “shows that the intersection performance is maintained at all intersections during the construction phase of the project except for the Bathurst Street/ Day Street intersection”, with a deterioration in the LoS from C to D, refer to Appendix 5.
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 8 of 21
3.2.2. Impact on Public Transport
There is no long-term impact on public transport as there no changes proposed to the Park Street area. Lane closures will be required on Park Street during acoustic shed removal. This will require the closure of the bus stop on the eastbound carriageway between Pitt and Castlereagh streets. In previous closures the bus stop has been relocated to the bus stop that currently exists between Pitt and George streets. These works will be undertaken at night.
3.2.3. Impact on Pedestrians and Cyclists
During the hoarding works and the acoustic shed removal, pedestrians will be diverted from the affected footpaths during weekends or at night. Access and egress of vehicles will require pedestrian management at the driveways as per Appendix 3.
Delivery of oversize and over mass vehicles will require the diversion of pedestrians from the Castlereagh Street frontage at night.
3.2.4. Impacts on commercial and residential access
There is no impact on existing commercial or residential property access arrangements.
3.2.5. Staff parking and transportation to site
During the site operations and demobilisation period, it is anticipated that there will be 30-75 personnel on site. There will be some car parking spaces on site, however, the workforce will be encouraged to arrive by site using public transport, with most likely to use the Town Hall Interchange, a 4-minute walk (280m) from site.
3.2.6. Cumulative impacts
There are numerous development applications either approved or on exhibition surrounding the site. The DAs tend to be either minor refurbishments or changes to hours of operation. It is not anticipated that the construction site will impact on current DA or visa versa.
The Sydney Light Rail works are occurring on George Street between Circular Quay and Central. Where works are required to impact on traffic and pedestrian thoroughfares, contact will be made with the constructor to ascertain any conflicts. It should be noted that the Sydney Light Rail is due to be operational by 2020 and that George Street will again be open to vehicle traffic from south of Bathurst Street. It is also noted that works will commence in 2018 on the Cloud Arch at the corner of George and Park streets.
3.2.7. Special Events
There are numerous special events held within the Sydney CBD. In reviewing the City of Sydney’s website, the majority of events are held within the Town Hall or other buildings. However, it is recognised that Class 1 and 2 events, as noted in the TMC’s publication (Special Events Guide 2006) do occur within the city centre. JHCPBG JV will work with the various stakeholders in planning their works.
Events that are adjacent or directly impact the work site directly are typically held on a Sunday. These include the Sydney Running Festival events and City to Surf held in Spring. It is understood the Vivid Festival had a lighting installation in ‘the galleries’ opposite the site on Pitt Street.
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 9 of 21
3.2.8. Traffic Control Plan (TCP) / Road Occupancy License (ROL) Identified Works
Works that have been identified as requiring a Traffic Control Plan are detailed below. Appendix 3 provides details on timing for implementation, the works being undertaken and the expected traffic impacts.
1. Pedestrian management during access/ egress
2. Footpath/ lane closures
3.2.9. City of Sydney Council required approvals
Works that have been identified as requiring Council approval include:
1. Oversize and over mass vehicle movements
2. Hoarding installation/ replacement
3. Change to parking restriction on Pitt Street from time limited No Stopping to full time NoStopping
3.2.10. Roads and Maritime required approvals
Works that have been identified as requiring specific RMS approval include:
1. Oversize and over mass vehicle movements
4. Fleet Management
Trucks to be used on the project will be compliant with NSW legislation and standards including the Heavy Vehicle National Legislation. All heavy vehicle operations will be conducted in accordance with the Chain of Responsibility (CoR) Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-HS-PLN-002164).
A combination of truck types will be used during the site operation works. These trucks may be single unit, semi-trailers, bin trucks and 5t tippers.
4.1. Haulage Routes
Generally, the haulage routes will be via arterial roads/ freeway or Tollway. Where possible the routes have taken into account the requirements of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). It is noted that the EIS for this site access shows access via Pitt Street and Castlereagh Street with egress onto Castlereagh Street, refer to Figure 3 below. It is further noted that the Ministerial Conditions of Approval and the Construction Traffic Management Framework identify the approval pathway for changes to the EIS nominated haulage routes. It is noted that the haulage routes are based on previously approved routes for the demolition and site establishment works.
Material will be removed and delivered to site using a combination of vehicles. These trucks will range in size from 5.5m to 19.0m. Semi-trailer deliveries will occur out of hours. Refer to Appendix 4 for details on the proposed routes.
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 10 of 21
Figure 3 EIS Haulage routes
4.2. Permits/ Over Dimensional Vehicles
Permit issue for vehicles greater than 45.5 tonnes is through the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR). This applies to particular special purpose vehicles (SPV) such as mobile cranes and other oversize/over mass vehicles (OSOM). At present, RMS is currently undertaking this permit issue for State roads and Council for local/ regional roads.
For over dimensional vehicles, generally vehicles that are greater than 25m length or 3.5m width require a pilot(s). Extremely long or wide vehicles will require an escort (fee payable). Permits will be applied for by the transport operator.
Oversize vehicles will be required at this site for removal of:
Water treatment plant Large plant such as excavators, road headers etc
Oversize vehicles will be required at this site for delivery of:
Arch lining formwork systems
These removals/ deliveries will occur outside of peak hours.
4.3. Drivers and Operators
Operator selection will be based on safety performance criteria. Operators and drivers will be required to have general construction industry induction cards and will be required to attend ongoing general project and site-specific inductions.
All operators will be comprehensively trained with regard to community expectations and impacts from haulage operations. The induction will have a particular focus on operator behaviour. Operator competency and standards of behaviour will be continually assessed, and discipline procedures will be put in place to maintain compliance.
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 11 of 21
Queuing of trucks in local streets around the sites will not occur as there will be sufficient designated area within site for trucks to wait and the truck marshalling facility at White Bay is in operation, refer to SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-TM-PLN-002299. Trucks will arrive post the site start times.
5. Other Considerations
5.1. Road Safety Audits
Road safety audits will be undertaken during the development of the CTMP and upon implementation of the long-term work site. Refer to Appendix 6 for the audit report.
5.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast
A weekly traffic forecast is provided to local councils, RMS, Emergency Services, TfNSW, SCO and other stakeholders as requested. This forecast details the up and coming works and details of timings including hours of the day and dates of works that will impact traffic- road, public transport, pedestrians and cyclist.
5.3. Police and Emergency Services
The Police and relevant Emergency Services will be informed in a timely manner of relevant activities proposed within this CTMP. The initial communication to these stakeholders will be via the Traffic and Transport Liaison Group (TTLG). Regular updates will be provided to emergency services, including changes to road network configurations, changes to road conditions and worksite access locations, through emails and face to face discussions.
5.4. Communications and the community
The TSE will be responsible for the dissemination of information to the community including affected residents, relevant Councils, businesses and the public. Refer to Sydney Metro Community Consultation Strategy – Early Works.
Any enquiries, complaints and/ or compliments are to be directed to the TfNSW’s Sydney Metro Project Information line - 1800 171 386 or via email to: [email protected] or Sydney Metro City & Southwest, PO Box K659, Haymarket, NSW 1240 or Sydney Metro City & Southwest Website.
Table 2 provides the proposed communications to be implemented for this CTMP
Table 2 Proposed Communications
NOTIFICATION APPLICABLE
Community notice YES
Precinct update/ e-update YES
Email YES
Internet YES
On site briefings YES
Print advertising YES – Quarterly newsletter only
Advance warning signs YES
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 12 of 21
5.4.1. Travelling public
Where our works will impact on the travelling public we will undertake the following, where identified on the plans:
Public transport interruptions will be communicated via on site signage Motoring public will be forewarned of any changes, including road closures, road changes
and lane closures well in advance using appropriate signage, including variable messagesigns (VMS), where identified on the plans.
Pedestrians and cyclists will be provided with advance warning signs, as detailed on theTCP
5.4.2. Stakeholders consulted
Table 3 identifies the stakeholders consulted during the development of this CTMP:
Table 3: Stakeholder consultation
STAKEHOLDER DATE CONSULTATION MAIN CONTACT PEOPLE
TCG 22 May 18 Meeting RMS/ Councils/ SCO/ TfNSW
City of Sydney 23 May 18 Submission of CTMP Tony Ly/ Van Le
RMS 23 May 18 Submission of CTMP Carl Mella
TfNSW 23 May 18 Submission of CTMP Berin Gordon
SCO 23 May 18 Submission of CTMP Giovanny Ramirez/ Aaron Gale/ Justine Bryant
Centre for Road Safety 23 May 18 Submission of CTMP Luke Wilby
City of Sydney 19 June 18 Resubmission of CTMP Tony Ly/ Van Le/ Asad Rajbhoy
RMS 19 June 18 Resubmission of CTMP Carl Mella
TfNSW 19 June 18 Resubmission of CTMP Berin Gordon
SCO 19 June 18 Resubmission of CTMP Giovanny Ramirez/ Aaron Gale/ Justine Bryant
City of Sydney 25 Sept 18 Resubmission of CTMP Tony Ly/ Van Le/ Asad Rajbhoy
RMS 25 Sept 18 Resubmission of CTMP Carl Mella
TfNSW 25 Sept 18 Resubmission of CTMP Berin Gordon
SCO 25 Sept 18 Resubmission of CTMP Giovanny Ramirez/ Jake Cole
5.5. Inspections and monitoring
The site will be monitored by the site supervisor. Any changes as noted in this CTMP, to signs/ lines that impact on the public will be monitored daily during site operating hours.
Traffic control used for pedestrian management, lane closures etc. will need to provide records of the traffic control implemented. Any changes required to the traffic control set up will be authorised by a holder of an RMS “Prepare a Work Zone Traffic Management Plan” or equivalent.
All 29 June 20 CTMP update for end dates All
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 13 of 21
5.6. Environmental Maintenance
All works will be undertaken in accordance with the TSE Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002010) and associated sub plans including the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SMCSTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002012). The TSE Works are also regulated by the NSW Environment Protection Authority and works to be undertaken outside of standard construction hours will need to comply with the requirements of the Environment Protection License.
5.7. Site Contacts
Table 4: Site contacts
NAME POSITION CONTACT #
Bobby Saeheng Project Manager
Tony Macpherson Superintendent
Sydney Metro Traffic Team phone
5.8. References
The following documents were used in the development of this CTMP:
Construction Traffic Management Framework – Version 2.5 provided 22/ 12/17 Principal’s General Specification G10 Traffic and Transport Management, v2.0 Roads and Maritime Service Traffic Control at Worksites Manual v 4.0 Relevant AustRoads Guides and RMS Supplements Sydney Metro Principal Contractor Health and Safety Standard SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002284 Pitt Street North Site Establishment Sydney Metro City and Southwest Environmental Impact Statement, May 2016 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-TM-PLN-002299 White Bay Truck Marshalling Facility DD-SYDM-TMP-0007-C-01 Pitt St Demolition Site Stage 2
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 14 of 21
Appendix 1 Parking restrictions
DRAWING NUMBER DESCRIPTION
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521802- A Existing parking restrictions
/
/
BINBBBBBBN
B INBBB
B INB INBB IN
B INN
B INBIN
BINBIN
BBBBBBN
BIBN
BBBB
BIB IN
B IN
PITT ST
PARK
ST
CASTLEREAGH ST
PITT ST
PARK
ST
CASTLEREAGH STR2-6(L)
PG7-3-1(R)
R5-400(LR)R5-400(L)
R5-23(R)
R5-39
OT
HE
RT
IME
S
R5-20(L) R5-23(R)
R5-20(LR) EXISTING BUS STOPID:2000426
OT
HE
RT
IME
S
R5-23(L)R5-400(R)
R5-39
R5-402(L)
R6-235-8
R2-6(L)
R2-6(R)
SPS-LW-RS-054
SPS-LW-RS-056
4PMETER
MOUNTED ON STREETLIGHTING POLE
R5-402(R)
MOUNTED ONSIGNAL POST
SPS-LW-RS-052
SPS-LW-RS-053
MOUNTED ONSIGNAL POST
SPS-LW-RS-050
SPS-
LW-R
S-05
1
NO STOPPING
SPS-LW-RS-055SPS-LW-RS-057
4PMETER
HOCHTIEF
SERVICEPROVIDERS
DRAWING COLOUR CODED - PRINT ALL COPIES IN COLOUR
CAMD DESCRIPTION DESIGNERSIGN./DATE
VERIFIEDSIGN./DATE
APPROVEDSIGN./DATE
SCALES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
DF 801*554
Plot
Dat
e &
Tim
eFi
le P
lotte
d
CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE:DRG No.STATUS:FILE No.
DRAWN
DESIGNED
DRG CHECK
DESIGN CHECK
APPROVED
OFSHEET:
EDMS No.
This drawing and the related information have been prepared by, or at the request of, Transport for NSW for a specificpurpose and may not be used for any purpose other than the purpose intended by Transport for NSW.Transport for NSW does not provide any warranties and accepts no liability arising out of the use of this drawing or anyof the related information for any purpose other than the intended purpose. This drawing is protected by copyrightand no part of this drawing may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Transport for NSW.
CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE: Plot
ted
by1/
15/2
018
4:05
PM
DAVI
D.TH
OMSO
N
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCLIENT
IC CERTIFIED - IC CERTIFICATE
REVISION
IN PROGRESSCHECK PRINT
INITIAL DATE
PRELIM. FINAL
ENGINEER CHECK
DRAFTING CHECK
BACKDRAFTED/CORRECTED
CONFIRMED/VERIFIED
0
SCALE 1:250 AT A1 SIZE
7.52.5 5.0 10 12.5 15mSYDNEY METRO CITY & SOUTHWESTPITT STREET STATION AND PRECINCTLOCAL AREA WORKSSIGNAGE AND LINEMARKING PLANSHEET 2
SUBSTANTIAL DETAILED DESIGN11 26
1:250 10.11.17D. ROBERTSON
10.11.17D. THOMSON
10.11.17N. TANG
10.11.17J. MACADANGDANG
10.11.17K. KIM
MGA AHD
A ISSUED FOR SDD NT/10.11.17 DT/10.11.17 DR/10.11.17 A1
ASMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521802
C:\S
MCS
W-T
SE-E
xpor
t\
PM
KEY PLANNOT TO SCALE
PITT STREET
PARKSTREET
BATHURSTSTREET
CASTLEREAGH STREET
SHEET 1SHEET 2
R5-400(L)
LEGENDGENERAL
TSE PROJECT SITE AS PER TSEPROJECT DEED SCHEDULE D1
TSE AREAS AS PER TSEPROJECT DEED SCHEDULE D1
CADASTRAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED SIGN FACE
EXISTING SIGN FACETO BE RETAINED
EXISTING SIGN FACE TO BEREMOVED OR COVERED
PROPOSED POSTMOUNTED SIGN FACE
EXISTING POSTMOUNTED SIGN FACE
R5-400(L)
R5-400(L)
NOTES1. FOR GENERAL NOTES REFER TO DRAWING No. 521004.2. FOR GENERAL LEGEND REFER TO DRAWING No. 521006.3. FOR SIGNAGE SCHEDULE REFER TO DRAWING No. 521811.
EXISTING WALL/POLEMOUNTED SIGN FACE
PROPOSED WALL/POLEMOUNTED SIGN FACE
C1 LINEMARKING TAG
LOCAL WORKS CONTROL LINE
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 15 of 21
Appendix 2 Current and proposed site operations
DRAWING NUMBER DESCRIPTION
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521512 Current and proposed access/ egress arrangements
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521902 Swept path
JCG-SPS-TM-DRG-002284-0058 10 Wheeler Access
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521802- 2 Proposed parking restrictions
PM 1
3
13
1
112
22
1
1
17 100
Single Unit Truck/Bus (12.5 m)
SERVICEPROVIDERS
DRAWING COLOUR CODED - PRINT ALL COPIES IN COLOUR
CAMD DESCRIPTION DESIGNERSIGN./DATE
VERIFIEDSIGN./DATE
APPROVEDSIGN./DATE
SCALES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
DF 801*554
Plot
Dat
e &
Tim
eFi
le P
lotte
d
CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE:DRG No.STATUS:FILE No.
DRAWN
DESIGNED
DRG CHECK
DESIGN CHECK
APPROVED
OFSHEET:
EDMS No.
This drawing and the related information have been prepared by, or at the request of, Transport for NSW for a specificpurpose and may not be used for any purpose other than the purpose intended by Transport for NSW.Transport for NSW does not provide any warranties and accepts no liability arising out of the use of this drawing or anyof the related information for any purpose other than the intended purpose. This drawing is protected by copyrightand no part of this drawing may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Transport for NSW.
CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE: Plot
ted
by6/
18/2
018
9:58
AM
PTUL
LY1
CLIENT
SL/18.06.18ISSUED FOR INTERNAL REVIEW 18.06.18 SL/18.06.18A1
18.06.18SUE LEWIS
18.06.18SUE LEWIS
18.06.18SUE LEWIS
18.06.18SUE LEWIS
18.06.18PHIL TULLY
-
-1
A1JCG-SPS-TM-DRG-002284-0058
1 TRUCK-10m SWEPT PATH PITT STREET NORTH ACCESSTRAFFIC MANAGEMENTPITT STREET STATION AND PRECINCTSYDNEY METRO CITY & SOUTHWEST0 2.5 10 12.5m7.55
SCALE 1:250 (A1)SCALE 1:500 (A3)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)
G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)
G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)
G (D)
W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D) W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D) W (D) W (D)
W (D)W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)W
(D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)W (D)
W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D)
W (D) W (D) W (D)
W (D)W (D)
W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D)
W (D)
S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D)
S (D)
S (D)
S (D)S (D)
S (D)S (D)
S (D)
TCSTCS
TCSTCS
TCSTCS
TCSTCS
TCS
TCSTCS
TCSTCS
TCS
TCS
TCS
TCS
TCSTCSTCSTCS
TCS
TCS
TCS TCS
TCS
TCS
G (D)
W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D)
OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D)
T (D)
T (D) T (D)OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)
OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)
OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)OF (D) OF (D)
OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D) OF (D)
OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D
)
OF (D) OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D) HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D
)
HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D
)HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D
)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D) HV (D)HV
(D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)HV (D
)HV
(D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
HV (D)
S (D)
OF (D) OF (D)OF (D)
OF (D)
OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)
W (D) W (D)
W (D) W (D)
S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D)
S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D)
G (D)
G (D)
G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)
W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D)
X X
XX
X X
X X
X X
XX
XX
XX
X
XX
X X
X X
X
X X
G (D)G (D)G (D)
SLH
SLH
HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)
BIN
BIN
BIN
BINBIN
BINBIN
PITT ST
PARK
ST
CASTLEREAGH ST
PITT ST
PARK
ST
CASTLEREAGH ST
EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE RETAINED ASCONSTRUCTION SITE EGRESS DRIVEWAY
EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BERETAINED AS AUXILIARY SITEACCESS / EGRESS DRIVEWAY
EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE RETAINED ASCONSTRUCTION SITE ACCESS DRIVEWAY
RETAIN CITY OF SYDNEYSTORMWATER GULLY PIT
HOCHTIEFENGINEERING
SERVICEPROVIDERS
DRAWING COLOUR CODED - PRINT ALL COPIES IN COLOUR
CAMD DESCRIPTION DESIGNERSIGN./DATE
VERIFIEDSIGN./DATE
APPROVEDSIGN./DATE
SCALES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
DF 801*554
Plot
Dat
e &
Tim
eFi
le P
lotte
d
CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE:DRG No.STATUS:FILE No.
DRAWN
DESIGNED
DRG CHECK
DESIGN CHECK
APPROVED
OFSHEET:
EDMS No.
This drawing and the related information have been prepared by, or at the request of, Transport for NSW for a specificpurpose and may not be used for any purpose other than the purpose intended by Transport for NSW.Transport for NSW does not provide any warranties and accepts no liability arising out of the use of this drawing or anyof the related information for any purpose other than the intended purpose. This drawing is protected by copyrightand no part of this drawing may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Transport for NSW.
CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE: Plot
ted
by1/
15/2
018
4:37
PM
NATH
AN.T
ANG
CLIENTIC CERTIFIED - IC CERTIFICATE
REVISION
IN PROGRESSCHECK PRINT
INITIAL DATE
PRELIM. FINAL
ENGINEER CHECK
DRAFTING CHECK
BACKDRAFTED/CORRECTED
CONFIRMED/VERIFIED
0
SCALE 1:250 AT A1 SIZE
7.52.5 5.0 10 12.5 15mSYDNEY METRO CITY & SOUTHWESTPITT STREET STATION AND PRECINCTLOCAL AREA WORKSGENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLANSHEET 2
STAGE 3 DESIGN REVIEW - WIP0 0
1:250 ------
------
------
------
------
MGA AHD
A ISSUED FOR DCD NT/21/08/17 DR/21/08/17 KL/21/08/17
B ISSUED FOR SDD NT/13/11/17 DR/13/11/17 KL/13/11/17
C.1 --- --- ---
A1
C.1SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521512
LEGENDGENERAL
CADASTRAL BOUNDARY
TSE PROJECT SITE AS PER TSEPROJECT DEED SCHEDULE D1
STATION MCOTSE AREAS AS PER TSEPROJECT DEED SCHEDULE D1
DRIVEWAY AND LAYBACK
TSW
GSW
E
EXISTING UTILITIES. FORDETAILS AND PROPOSEDRELOCATIONS REFER TOUTILITY COORDINATIONDRAWINGS
< T <
AXUHVU
OF
LVU< SL <
EXISTING STORMWATER
PITT STREET STATION PRECINCTCIVIL WORKS (STATIONS &SURROUNDS). REFER TO DESIGNLOT DP-S-170 FOR DETAILS
PITT STREET STATION ANDPRECINCT OPEN BOX EXCAVATION,SHORING AND SUPPORT ANDBRIDGE STRUCTURE REFER TODESIGN LOT DP-S-150
NOTES1. FOR GENERAL NOTES REFER TO DRAWING No. 521004.2. FOR GENERAL LEGEND REFER TO DRAWING No. 521006.
EXISTING DRIVEWAY ANDLAYBACK TO BE RETAINED
ADJO
INS
SMCS
WTS
E-JA
B-SP
S-LW
-DRG
-521511
PM
KEY PLANNOT TO SCALE
PITT STREET
SHEET 1 SHEET 2
PARKSTREET
BATHURSTSTREET
CASTLEREAGH STREET
/
/
BIN
BIN
BIN
BINBIN
BINBIN
PITT ST
PARK
ST
CASTLEREAGH ST
Passenger vehicle (5.2 m)
Passenger vehicle (5.2 m)
PITT ST
PARK
ST
CASTLEREAGH ST
HOCHTIEF
ENGINEERING
SERVICEPROVIDERS
DRAWING COLOUR CODED - PRINT ALL COPIES IN COLOUR
CAMD DESCRIPTION DESIGNERSIGN./DATE
VERIFIEDSIGN./DATE
APPROVEDSIGN./DATE
SCALES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
DF 801*554
Plot
Dat
e &
Tim
eFi
le P
lotte
d
CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE:DRG No.STATUS:FILE No.
DRAWN
DESIGNED
DRG CHECK
DESIGN CHECK
APPROVED
OFSHEET:
EDMS No.
This drawing and the related information have been prepared by, or at the request of, Transport for NSW for a specificpurpose and may not be used for any purpose other than the purpose intended by Transport for NSW.Transport for NSW does not provide any warranties and accepts no liability arising out of the use of this drawing or anyof the related information for any purpose other than the intended purpose. This drawing is protected by copyrightand no part of this drawing may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Transport for NSW.
CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE: Plot
ted
by4/
5/20
18 2
:09
PMDA
VID.
THOM
SON
CLIENTIC CERTIFIED - IC CERTIFICATE
FOR CONSTRUCTION
0
SCALE 1:250 AT A1 SIZE
7.52.5 5.0 10 12.5 15mSYDNEY METRO CITY & SOUTHWESTPITT STREET STATION AND PRECINCTLOCAL AREA WORKSSWEPT PATH PLANSHEET 2
FOR CONSTRUCTION17 27
1:250 05.04.18D. ROBERTSON
05.04.18L. AVUK
05.04.18N. TANG
05.04.18D. THOMSON
05.04.18K. KIM
MGA AHD
00 ASSURED FOR CONSTRUCTION TM/05.04.18 DT/05.04.18 DR/05.04.18 A1
00SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521902
C:\S
MCS
W-T
SE-E
xpor
t\
SMCSWTSE-IC-CER-B2-043
GENERAL
DRIVEWAY AND LAYBACK
TSE PROJECT SITE AS PER TSEPROJECT DEED SCHEDULE D1
TSE AREAS AS PER TSEPROJECT DEED SCHEDULE D1
CADASTRAL BOUNDARY
PITT STREET STATION PRECINCTCIVIL WORKS (STATION &SURROUNDS) REFER TO DESIGNLOT DP-S-170 FOR DETAILS
CAR(AUSTROADS, 2013)
SERVICE VEHICLE (8.8m)(AUSTROADS, 2013)
EXISTING DRIVEWAY ANDLAYBACK TO BE RETAINED
CONCRETE AGI
PM
KEY PLANNOT TO SCALE
PITT STREET
PARKSTREET
BATHURSTSTREET
CASTLEREAGH STREET
SHEET 1SHEET 2
/
/
BIN
BIN
BIN
BINBIN
BINBIN
PITT ST
PARK
ST
CASTLEREAGH ST
PITT ST
PARK
ST
CASTLEREAGH STR2-6(L)
PG7-3-1(R)
R5-400(LR)R5-400(L)
R5-23(R)
R5-39
OT
HE
R
TIM
ES
R5-20(L) R5-23(R)
R5-20(LR) EXISTING BUS STOPID:2000426
OT
HE
R
TIM
ES
R5-23(L)R5-400(R)
R5-39
R5-402(L)
R6-235-8
R2-6(L)
R2-6(R)
SPS-LW-RS-054
SPS-LW-RS-056
4P-10AM
METER
7AM
MOUNTED ON STREETLIGHTING POLE
R5-402(R)
MOUNTED ONSIGNAL POST
SPS-LW-RS-052
SPS-LW-RS-053
MOUNTED ONSIGNAL POST
SPS-LW-RS-050
NO STOPPING
SPS-LW-RS-055SPS-LW-RS-057
4P-10AM
METER
7AM
R5-400(R)R5-400(R)
HOCHTIEFENGINEERING
SERVICEPROVIDERS
DRAWING COLOUR CODED - PRINT ALL COPIES IN COLOUR
CAMD DESCRIPTION DESIGNERSIGN./DATE
VERIFIEDSIGN./DATE
APPROVEDSIGN./DATE
SCALES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
DF 801*554
Plot
Dat
e &
Tim
eFi
le P
lotte
d
CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE:DRG No.STATUS:FILE No.
DRAWN
DESIGNED
DRG CHECK
DESIGN CHECK
APPROVED
OFSHEET:
EDMS No.
This drawing and the related information have been prepared by, or at the request of, Transport for NSW for a specificpurpose and may not be used for any purpose other than the purpose intended by Transport for NSW.Transport for NSW does not provide any warranties and accepts no liability arising out of the use of this drawing or anyof the related information for any purpose other than the intended purpose. This drawing is protected by copyrightand no part of this drawing may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Transport for NSW.
CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE: Plot
ted
by9/
19/2
018
10:2
4 AM
MZA
Z142
0
CLIENTIC CERTIFIED - IC CERTIFICATE
R
E
V
IS
IO
N
IN
P
R
O
G
R
E
S
S
CHECK PRINTINITIAL DATE
PRELIM. FINAL
ENGINEER CHECK
DRAFTING CHECK
BACKDRAFTED/CORRECTED
CONFIRMED/VERIFIED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
0
SCALE 1:250 AT A1 SIZE
7.52.5 5.0 10 12.5 15mSYDNEY METRO CITY & SOUTHWESTPITT STREET STATION AND PRECINCTLOCAL AREA WORKSSIGNAGE AND LINEMARKING PLANSHEET 2
FOR CONSTRUCTION11 27
1:250 18.09.18D. ROBERTSON
18.09.18E. ESTORES JR.
18.09.18C. ALBESA
18.09.18F. BATHAN
18.09.18T. THEIVENDRAN
MGA AHD
00 ASSURED FOR CONSTRUCTION TM/05.04.18 DT/05.04.18 DR/05.04.18
01 SIGNS REMOVED CA/27.08.18 DT/27.08.18 DR/27.08.18
02 NO STOPPING SIGNS REPLACED CA/18.09.18 DT/18.09.18 DR/18.09.18
A1
02SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521802
C:\S
MCS
W-T
SE-E
xpor
t\
SMCSWTSE-IC-CER-B2-043
PM
KEY PLANNOT TO SCALE
PITT STREET
PARKSTREET
BATHURSTSTREET
CASTLEREAGH STREET
SHEET 1SHEET 2
R5-400(L)
LEGENDGENERAL
TSE PROJECT SITE AS PER TSEPROJECT DEED SCHEDULE D1
TSE AREAS AS PER TSEPROJECT DEED SCHEDULE D1
CADASTRAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED SIGN FACE
EXISTING SIGN FACETO BE RETAINED
EXISTING SIGN FACE TO BEREMOVED OR COVERED
PROPOSED POSTMOUNTED SIGN FACE
EXISTING POSTMOUNTED SIGN FACE
R5-400(L)
R5-400(L)
NOTES1. FOR GENERAL NOTES REFER TO DRAWING No. 521004.2. FOR GENERAL LEGEND REFER TO DRAWING No. 521006.3. FOR SIGNAGE SCHEDULE REFER TO DRAWING No. 521811.
EXISTING WALL/POLEMOUNTED SIGN FACE
PROPOSED WALL/POLEMOUNTED SIGN FACE
C1 LINEMARKING TAG
LOCAL WORKS CONTROL LINE
0202
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 16 of 21
Appendix 3 Traffic control plans
TCP # LOCATION FROM TO TIMING TRAFFIC CONTROL WORKS IMPACTS
TCP-SPS-PAR-PITT-PEDMGT-NBSB-000002
Park Street Castlereagh Street
Pitt Street
Nights/ weekends
Pedestrian diversion to southern footpath
Delivery/removal of plant
Acoustic shed removal
Hoarding works
Minimal impacts to pedestrians as diversion undertaken at night/ weekends
Bus stop closed
TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401
Castlereagh Street
Park Street North of site
Nights/ weekends
Pedestrian diversion onto eastern footpath
Delivery/removal of plant
Acoustic shed removal
Driveway decommissioning
Hoarding works
Minimal impacts to pedestrians as diversion undertaken at night/ weekends
TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-1401
Castlereagh Street
Park Street North of site
Nights Lane closure adjacent to site
Delivery/removal of plant
Acoustic shed removal
Driveway decommissioning
Hoarding works
Minimal impacts to traffic as traffic control undertaken at night
TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-0302
Park Street Castlereagh Street
Pitt Street
Nights/ weekends
Pedestrian diversion to southern footpath
Delivery/removal of plant
Acoustic shed removal
Hoarding works
Minimal impacts to pedestrians as diversion undertaken at night/ weekends
Bus stop open
TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301
Park Street Castlereagh Street
Pitt Street
Nights Lane closure adjacent to site
Delivery/removal of plant
Acoustic shed removal
Hoarding works
Works to be undertaken at night – bus stop open
TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0202
Pitt Street Park Street North of site
Nights Pedestrian diversion to western footpath
Delivery/removal of plant
Acoustic shed removal
Driveway decommissioning
Hoarding works
Minimal impacts to pedestrians as diversion undertaken at night/ weekend
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 17 of 21
TCP # LOCATION FROM TO TIMING TRAFFIC CONTROL WORKS IMPACTS
TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-1201
Pitt Street Park Street North of site
Nights Parking and lane closure adjacent to site
Delivery/removal of plant
Acoustic shed removal
Driveway decommissioning
Hoarding works
Minimal impacts to traffic as traffic control undertaken at night
TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-2401
Castlereagh Street
Park Street North of site
Nights Double lane closure adjacent to site
Delivery/removal of plant
Acoustic shed removal
Driveway decommissioning
Hoarding works
Minimal impacts to traffic as traffic control undertaken at night
NOT TO SCALE
N
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 27/11/2017REV 1 : 10/12/2017REV 2: 09/04/2018REV 3: 23/04/2018
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGENDSPS
PARK ST/PITT ST, SYDNEY
TCP-SPS-PAR-PITT-EB-PEDMGT-NBSB-000002
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
BUS LANEBUS LANE
BUS LANE
PA
RK
ING
LN
PA
RK
ING
LN
CA
ST
LER
EA
GH
ST
RE
ETPARK STREET
PIT
T S
TR
EE
T
PIT
T S
TR
EE
TPARK STREET
PE
DE
ST
RIA
NS
T8-2R US
E O
TH
ER
FO
OT
PA
THT8-3
FO
OT
PA
TH
CL
OS
ED
T8-4
PEDESTRIANDIVERSION
ROUTE
PEDESTRIAN DIVERSIONROUTE
BUS STOP CLOSED
PE
DE
ST
RIA
NS
FO
OT
PA
TH
CL
OS
ED
US
E O
TH
ER
FO
OT
PA
TH
ABDULLAH KHAN
0032576588
NOTE:
1. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TOBUSINESS & RESIDENTS TO BE MAINTAINED.
2. TCP DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTCAWS TCP-61.
3. TCP may be used in conjunction withTCP-SPS-PAR-AL-2301
www.invarion.com
NOT TO SCALE
N
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 04/01/2018REV 1: 18/01/2018REV 2: 20/03/2018REV 3: 09/04/2018REV 4: 18/06/2018
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
SPS
CASTLEREAGH ST,SYDNEY
TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-1401
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
ABDULLAH KHAN
0032576588
BUSLANE
BUSLANE
BUSLANE
BUSLANE
CA
ST
LER
EA
GH
ST
MARKET ST
PARK ST
T1-5-2 *T1-5-2 *
40M
40M
15MMERGETAPER
T5-5
Approximatespeed of traffic
km/h
Traffic controlat beginning of
taper
Lateral shifttaper Merge taper
45 or less 15 0 15
46-55 15 15 30
56-65 30 30 60
20MBUFFER
ZONE
T2-6-XT2-6-1 T2-6-XT2-6-1
NOTE:
1.This TCP is developed in accordance withTCAWS TCP-101.
2. When used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401 suitable provisionfor pedestrians crossing is to be made.
ENDROAD WORK
T2-16
www.invarion.com
NOT TO SCALE
N
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 21/12/2017REV 1: 18/01/2018REV 2: 09/04/2018REV 3: 18/06/2018
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
SPS
PARK ST, SYDNEY
TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
BUS LANEBUS LANE
BUS LANE
PA
RK
ING
LN
PA
RK
ING
LN
CA
ST
LER
EA
GH
ST
RE
ET
PIT
T S
TR
EE
T
PIT
T S
TR
EE
T
PARK STREET
BUS STOP OPEN
TRAFFIC FLOW
PEDESTRIAN DIVERSIONROUTE
BUS STOP OPEN
ABDULLAH KHAN
0032576588
Approximatespeed of traffic
km/h
Traffic controlat beginning of
taper
Lateral shifttaper Merge taper
45 or less 15 0 15
46-55 15 15 30
56-65 30 30 60
NIG
HT
RO
AD
WO
RK
AH
EA
D
T1-2
23 *
T1-2
24 *
40M
40M
40M
T5-5
15MM
ER
GE
TAP
ER
NIGHTROADWORK
AHEAD
T1-223 *
T1-224 *
NIGHTROADWORK
AHEAD
T1-223 *
T1-224 * 40m
40m
T5-5
BATHURST ST END
GE
OR
GE
ST
EN
DR
OA
D W
OR
K
T2-1
6
ENDROAD WORK
T2-16
40M
NOTE:
1. TCP developed in accordance with TCAWS TCP-83.
2. This TCP may be used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-0302.
T2-6-2
3.2M Min Lane widthto be maintained
www.invarion.com
NOT TO SCALE
N
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 18/01/2018REV 1: 22/03/2018REV 2: 09/04/2018REV 3: 23/04/2018REV 4: 18/06/2018
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
SPS
PARK ST/PITT ST, SYDNEY
TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0202
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
ABDULLAH KHAN
0032576588
BUS LANEBUS LANE
BUS LANE
PA
RK
ING
LN
PA
RK
ING
LN
CA
ST
LER
EA
GH
ST
RE
ET
PARK STREET
PIT
T S
TR
EE
T
PIT
T S
TR
EE
T
PARK STREET
CA
ST
LER
EA
GH
ST
RE
ET
BATHURST ST BATHURST ST
PEDESTRIAN DIVERSIONROUTE
TEMPORARY FIBREGLASSRAMP
SAFETY BARRIER
Traffic Controllers to assist pedestrians
NOTE:
1. TCP developed in accordance with TCAWS TCP-61.
2. Temporary fibreglass ramps to be installedboth sides of street for pedestrian movements.
3. TCP may be used in conjunction withTCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0201
PA
RK
ING
BA
YPEDESTRIANS
T8-2L
PEDESTRIANS
USE OTHERFOOTPATH
FOOTPATHCLOSED
FOOTPATHCLOSED T8-4
FOOTPATHCLOSEDAHEAD
PEDESTRIANS www.invarion.com
NOT TO SCALE
N
BUS LANEBUS LANE
BUS LANE
PA
RK
ING
LN
PA
RK
ING
LN
CA
ST
LER
EA
GH
ST
RE
ET
PARK STREETP
ITT
ST
RE
ET
PIT
T S
TR
EE
T
PARK STREET
CA
ST
LER
EA
GH
ST
RE
ET
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 27/11/2017REV 1: 18/01/2017REV 2: 09/04/2018REV 3: 17/04/2018REV 4: 18/06/2018
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGENDSPS
PARK ST/PITT ST, SYDNEY
TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-1201
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
ABDULLAH KHAN
0032576588
TRAFFIC FLOW
ENDROAD WORK
T2-16
NOTE:
1. TCP developed in accordance with TCAWS TCP-101.
2. TCP can be used in conjunction withTCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0202.
Par
king
Ln
Par
king
Ln
BATHURST ST
T1-224 * T1-224 *40M
40M
40MR
OA
D W
OR
K
ON
SID
E R
OA
D
T1-2
5
40M
NIGHTROADWORK
AHEAD
T1-223 *
NIGHTROADWORK
AHEAD
T1-223 *
T2-6-2 T2-6-2
www.invarion.com
NOT TO SCALE
N
WORK VEHICLE
WORK ZONE
AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER
700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING
LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN
DATE: 18/01/2018REV 1: 09/04/2018REV 2: 18/06/2018
*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.
*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.
*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.
*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)
Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP
Team Leader (Onsite):
Signature:
Date:
Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)
Ticket No:
Reasons for modification:
Email to: [email protected]
AREA:
LOCATION:
TCP NO:
SHEET NO:
SPS
CASTLEREAGH ST,SYDNEY
TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-2401
1 OF 1
DRAWN BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
PLAN CHECKED BY:
CERTIFICATE NO:
SIGNATURE:
SAMANTH JADALA
0044399691
BUSLANE
BUSLANE
BUSLANE
BUSLANE
CA
ST
LER
EA
GH
ST
MARKET ST
PARK ST
Approximatespeed of traffic
km/h
Traffic controlat beginning of
taper
Lateral shifttaper Merge taper
45 or less 15 0 15
46-55 15 15 30
56-65 30 30 60
20MBUFFER
ZONE
NOTE:
1.This TCP is developed in accordance withTCAWS TCP-100.
2. When used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401 suitable provisionfor pedestrians crossing is to be made.
3. Traffic Cones to be adjusted to suit work location.
15MMERGETAPER
60MTAPER
15MMERGETAPER
80M
T5-5
T1-224 * T1-224 *
T2-6-2 T2-6-2
T5-5
T2-6-2T2-6-2
40M
RO
AD
WO
RK
O
N S
IDE
RO
AD
T1-2
5
ENDROAD WORK
T2-16
ABDULLAH KHAN
0032576588
www.invarion.com
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 18 of 21
Appendix 4 Haulage routes
DRAWING NUMBER DESCRIPTION
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0001 Castlereagh Street exit to Anzac Bridge
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0003 Anzac Bridge to Castlereagh Street access
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0004 Anzac Bridge to Pitt Street access
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0005 Castlereagh Street to ED Southbound
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0006 ED Northbound to Castlereagh Street
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0007 ED Northbound to Pitt Street
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0008 Northside to Pitt Street
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0009 Northside to Castlereagh Street
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0010 Castlereagh Street to northside
Map data ©2017 Google 200 m
3 min (550 m)
9 min (2.9 km)
500 m
350 m
400 m
650 m
160 m
400 m
350 m
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0001
Castlereagh Street to Anzac Bridge
Map data ©2017 Google 200 m
Continue to follow Western Distributor/A4
Destination will be on the right
2.0 km
180 m
230 m
550 m
400 m
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284
Anzac Bridge to Castlereagh St
Map data ©2017 Google 200 m
Continue to follow Western Distributor/A4
1.4 km
400 m
38 m
74 m
500 m
180 m
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284
Anzac Bridge to Pitt Street access
Map data ©2017 Google 100 m
120 m
66 m
150 m
250 m
500 m
50 m
66 m
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0005
Castlereagh site to ED southbound
Map data ©2017 Google 100 m
4 min (1.0 km)
49 m
450 m
350 m
120 m
3 min (550 m)
180 m
47 m
JCG-SPS-TM_DWG-002284-0006
ED Northbound to Castlereagh St
Map data ©2017 Google 100 m
Destination will be on the right
49 m
450 m
400 m
26 m
JCG-SPS-TM_DWG-002284-0007
ED NB to Pitt Street access
Map data ©2017 Google 200 m
Toll road
100 m
250 m
750 m
120 m
350 m
400 m
26 m
JCG-SPS-TM_DWG-002284-0008
Northside to Pitt
Map data ©2017 Google 200 m
Toll road
100 m
250 m
750 m
180 m
47 m
69 m
240 m
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0009
Northside to Castlereagh
Map data ©2017 Google 500 m
500 m
500 m
400 m
1.7 km
JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0010
Castlereagh St to northside
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 19 of 21
Appendix 5 EIS Excerpt
338 Sydney Metro | Chatswood to Sydenham EIS
Chapter 8 – Construction traffic and transport
8.4.15 Pitt Street StationVehicle movement forecasts and routesThe anticipated vehicle numbers (heavy and light vehicles) at the Pitt Street Station construction site over a typical day are provided in Figure 8-38. This graph shows that the peak heavy vehicle movements in the AM peak period (7am to 10am) would be six heavy vehicles per hour during the demolition and excavation phases.
The proposed haul routes are shown in Figure 8-39. Access and egress to and from the Pitt Street north site would be right in from Pitt Street, and right in, right out via Castlereagh Street. Access and egress to and from the Pitt Street south site would be right in from Bathurst Street, and right out to Pitt Street.
Sydney Metro | Chatswood to Sydenham EIS 339
Construction traffic and transport – Chapter 8
Heavy vehicles
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
7am
– 8
am
8am
– 9
am
9am
– 1
0am
10am
– 1
1am
11am
– 1
2pm
12p
m –
1p
m
1pm
– 2
pm
2pm
– 3
pm
3pm
– 4
pm
4p
m –
5p
m
5pm
– 6
pm
6p
m –
7p
m
7pm
– 8
pm
8p
m –
9p
m
9p
m –
10
pm
10p
m –
11p
m
11p
m –
12a
m
12am
– 1
am
1am
– 2
am
2am
– 3
am
3am
– 4
am
4am
– 5
am
5am
– 6
am
6am
– 7
am
Veh
icle
num
ber
s
Time of day
Demolition Excavation Fit-out
Light vehicles
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
7am
– 8
am
8am
– 9
am
9am
– 1
0am
10am
– 1
1am
11am
– 1
2pm
12p
m –
1p
m
1pm
– 2
pm
2pm
– 3
pm
3pm
– 4
pm
4p
m –
5p
m
5pm
– 6
pm
6p
m –
7p
m
7pm
– 8
pm
8p
m –
9p
m
9p
m –
10
pm
10p
m –
11p
m
11p
m –
12a
m
12am
– 1
am
1am
– 2
am
2am
– 3
am
3am
– 4
am
4am
– 5
am
5am
– 6
am
6am
– 7
am
Veh
icle
num
ber
s
Time of day
Demolition Excavation and fit-out
Figure 8-38 Pitt Street Station construction vehicle movements
340 Sydney Metro | Chatswood to Sydenham EIS
Chapter 8 – Construction traffic and transport
Liverpool Street Cas
tler
eag
hS t
reet
Druitt Street
Wes
t er n
Dis
trib
uto
r
Pi t
tS t
reet
El iz
abe t
hSt
reet
Market Street
William Street
Park Street
Bathurst Street
Cah
ill E
xpre
ssw
ay
Geo
rge
S
tree
t
Co
lleg
e S
tree
t
KEY
Proposed construction site area Primary, Inbound
Primary, Outbound
Secondary, Inbound
Secondary, Outbound
Existing suburban rail
N
Indicative only, subject to design development
Figure 8-39 Pitt Street Station construction site haul routes
Active transport networkThe City Centre Access Strategy (Transport for NSW, 2013a) identifies Castlereagh Street as a future strategic cycle route. Depending on the timing of the implementation of this cycle facility, Sydney Metro would liaise with the CBD Coordination Office and the City of Sydney Council to manage the potential impacts to cyclists on this section of the cycle route, and the provision of any alternative facilities should they be necessary.
Footpaths surrounding the sites on Pitt, Bathurst and Castlereagh streets would be reduced in width by around 600 millimetres during the construction works. These footpaths are currently greater than three metres wide and, therefore, a 2.4 metres wide footpath would be maintained, in line with the width requirements for footpaths set out in the Austroads guidelines
Public transport servicesElizabeth, Castlereagh and Park streets provide part of the major routes for bus services through the Sydney CBD. The addition of construction vehicle routes on these streets may result in impacts to these bus services such as minor delays to travel times. In order to minimise these potential impacts, the Pitt Street construction sites would be arranged to ensure construction vehicles are loaded and unloaded off the street. Additionally, the Pitt Street Station north site has been arranged to avoid an access or egress point via Park Street to reduce the potential for impacts to bus services.
Sydney Metro | Chatswood to Sydenham EIS 341
Construction traffic and transport – Chapter 8
In the event that any bus stops around the Pitt Street construction sites are required to be temporarily relocated during the construction works, this would be carried out by Transport for NSW in consultation with the bus operators and the CBD Coordination Office. The temporary relocation of any bus stops would not impact the operation of any bus services, however it may result in some passenger having to walk a short distance further to access bus stops.
Parking and taxisThe Pitt Street Station construction sites would not result in any loss of parking or impacts to taxi facilities.
Road network performanceTable 8-25 and Figure 8-40 shows the impact of construction on nearby key intersections during construction. In summary, this shows that the intersection performance is maintained at all intersections during the construction phase of the project except for the Bathurst Street / Day Street intersection. At this intersection, the level of service deteriorates from C to D in the PM peak. This is likely due to the intersection currently operating close to its theoretical capacity (at a degree of saturation 0.93). The average delay only deteriorates from 41 to 46 seconds per vehicle and the degree of saturation deteriorates from 0.93 to 0.95. It is therefore considered that the impact of the construction traffic on the operational performance of this intersection would be minimal.
The Pitt Street Station and Barangaroo Station construction sites would both use the Western Distributor as their primary haul route. However, given the low volumes of anticipated hourly heavy and light vehicles generated by each site, the combined impact of vehicles travelling to and from both sites is not considered to cause a material impact on the performance of the Western Distributor.
Table 8-25 Pitt Street Station construction site intersection performance
Peak period
Without construction With construction
Average delay (second per
vehicle)Level of Service
Degree of saturation
Average delay (second per
vehicle)Level of Service
Degree of saturation
Druitt Street / Sussex Street
AM 22 B 0.51 22 B 0.52
PM 26 B 0.70 26 B 0.69
Druitt Street / Kent Street
AM 17 B 0.67 17 B 0.65
PM 14 A 0.65 14 A 0.65
Druitt Street / Clarence Street
AM 20 B 0.87 18 B 0.87
PM 15 B 0.77 15 B 0.77
Druitt Street / Park Street / George Street / York Street
AM 18 B 0.80 18 B 0.79
PM 15 B 0.67 15 B 0.67
Park Street / Pitt Street
AM 18 B 0.63 18 B 0.63
PM 15 A 0.50 15 A 0.51
342 Sydney Metro | Chatswood to Sydenham EIS
Chapter 8 – Construction traffic and transport
Peak period
Without construction With construction
Average delay (second per
vehicle)Level of Service
Degree of saturation
Average delay (second per
vehicle)Level of Service
Degree of saturation
Park Street / Castlereagh Street
AM 23 B 0.67 23 B 0.67
PM 30 C 0.72 30 C 0.72
Park Street / Elizabeth Street
AM 35 C 0.72 35 C 0.72
PM 38 C 0.82 38 C 0.82
Bathurst Street / Harbour Street
AM 49 D 0.93 50 D 0.93
PM 43 D 0.93 44 D 0.93
Bathurst Street / Day Street
AM 307 F 1.19 324 F 1.20
PM 41 C 0.93 46 D 0.95
Bathurst Street / Sussex Street
AM 14 A 0.75 14 A 0.61
PM 16 B 0.76 16 B 0.74
Bathurst Street / Kent Street
AM 21 B 0.78 20 B 0.79
PM 22 B 0.72 22 B 0.71
Bathurst Street / George Street
AM 10 A 0.45 10 A 0.45
PM 10 A 0.47 10 A 0.49
Bathurst Street / Pitt Street
AM 20 B 0.54 20 B 0.54
PM 26 B 0.55 27 B 0.57
Bathurst Street / Castlereagh Street
AM 22 B 0.55 22 B 0.55
PM 10 A 0.54 10 A 0.54
Bathurst Street / Elizabeth Street
AM 27 B 0.73 27 B 0.73
PM 18 B 0.64 17 B 0.66
Sydney Metro | Chatswood to Sydenham EIS 343
Construction traffic and transport – Chapter 8
Proposedconstruction site area
Signalisedintersection Base + Construction LoSBase LoS X X
KEY
Indicative only, subject to design development
Market Street
Park StreetC
larence S
treet
Yo
rk Street
Druitt Street
Western Distr
ibutor
Day S
tree
t
Su
ssex Street
Ken
t Street
Bathurst Street
Liverpool Street
Geo
rge
Str
eet
Pit
t S
tree
t
Cas
tler
eag
h S
tree
t
Eliz
abet
h S
tree
t
AM
PM
A A
B B AM
PM
B B
B B
AM
PM
B B
B B
AM
PM
B B
B B
AM
PM
B B
B B
AM
PM
B B
B B
AM
PM
B B
A A
AM
PM
B B
A A AM
PM
B B
A A
AM
PM
A A
A AAM
PM
B B
B B
AM
PM
B B
C C
AM
PM
D D
D D
AM
PM
C C
C C
AM
PM
F F
C D
N
Figure 8-40 Pitt Street Station intersection performance
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 20 of 21
Appendix 6 Road safety audit
Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
SYDNEY METRO CITY AND SOUTHWEST - TUNNELS AND STATION EXCAVATIONSStage 3 Road Safety Audit Report
27 NOVEMBER 2017
iii
Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
SYDNEY METRO CITY AND SOUTHWEST - TUNNELS AND STATION EXCAVATIONS
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report
Report No F0007-AA009699-RSA-01
Date 27/11/2017
Revision Text 01
This report has been prepared for John Holland CPB Ghella JV (JHCPBG) in
accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment. Arcadis Australia Pacific
Pty Limited (ABN 76 104 485 289) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or
reliance on the contents of this report by any third party.
REVISIONS
Revision Date Description Approved
by
Draft 24/11/2017 Draft Report Issue MM
01 27/11/2017 Report Issue MM / DT
V
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 Establishing the audit team ................................................................................................ 5
1.2 Scope of the audit ............................................................................................................... 5
1.3 Responding to the road safety audit report ...................................................................... 5
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 6
2.1 Project information and site details................................................................................... 6
2.2 Previous road safety audit reports .................................................................................... 6
3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................. 7
3.1 Commencement meetings .................................................................................................. 7
3.2 Site inspection ..................................................................................................................... 7
3.3 Examination of available materials .................................................................................... 7
3.4 Determination of risk .......................................................................................................... 8
4 AUDIT FINDINGS .................................................................................................................. 10
4.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 11
5 AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT .................................................................................................. 16
TABLES Table 3-1 Examination materials provided .................................................................... 7 Table 3-2 How often is the problem likely to lead to a crash? ....................................... 8 Table 3-3 What is the likely severity of the resulting crash type?.................................. 8 Table 3.4 Determination of risk ...................................................................................... 9 Table 3-5 The resulting level of risk ............................................................................... 9
FIGURES Figure 2-1 Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works (Image
courtesy NSW Globe) .................................................................................................... 6
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 5
1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the findings of a Road Safety Audit – Stage 3 at the substantial
detailed design stage for the proposed Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct -
Local Area Works for the Sydney Metro City and Southwest – Tunnels and Station
excavations (SMCS TSE).
1.1 Establishing the audit team
The Road Safety Audit was carried out at the request of Arcadis Associate Technical
Director, Mr David Robertson. The audit was conducted by an audit team comprising:
Marcos Mejia – ID No: RSA-02-0576
Senior Road Safety Auditor – Level 3 (Lead auditor)
Arcadis
Daniel Talevski – ID No: RSA-02-0670
Senior Road Safety Auditor – Level 2
1.2 Scope of the audit
This Road Safety Audit has been carried out in accordance Schedule C1 – SWTC
Section 3.19, RMS Guidelines for Road Safety Audit Practices, Schedule C1
Appendix 8 Ref B50, Roads and Traffic Authority NSW - ‘Guidelines for Road Safety
Audit Practices, July 2011 (with reference to current practices outlined in Austroads
Guide to Road Safety Part 6 Road Safety Audit (2009)) as part of the process for
ensuring that safety elements were fully considered in the design of the project.
The role of the independent road safety audit team in the context of this commission
is:
Examination of the design documents provided, specifically the TSE Contractor’s
Activities that have an impact on any Local Areas including physical alterations,
change of use and / or introduction of new hazards.
Preparation of a Road Safety Audit report.
1.3 Responding to the road safety audit report
As set out in the Road Safety Audit guidelines, the responsibility for the road design
rests with the designer and project manager, not with the auditor. The project
manager is under no obligation to accept the audit findings and if applicable, audit
recommendations. Rather, the audit provides the opportunity to highlight potential
road safety problems and have them formally considered by the designer and project
manager in conjunction with all other project considerations. In general, there are four
methods of responding to an audit report. In order of preference, they are: Associates:
1. Remove the obstacle,
2. Redesign the obstacle so it can be safely traversed,
3. Relocate the obstacle to where it is less likely to be struck, and
4. Reduce impact severity by using an appropriate breakaway device.
Finally, it is not the role of the auditor to approve the designer or project manager’s
responses to the audit. The auditor is however able to provide advice and assist in the
determination of a suitable design response pursuant to reaching an agreement on a
suitable response and / or design amendment.
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 6
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 Project information and site details
There are two SMCSTSE Pitt Street Station construction sites located in the Sydney
CBD area. Pitt Street Station northern site is located adjacent Pitt Street, Park Street and Castlereagh Street and Pitt Street southern site is located on Pitt Street south of
Bathurst Street between the Edinburgh Castle and Princeton apartment buildings. Proposed works include;
New driveway entrance and exit to the southern SMCSW TSE construction site from Pitt St south of the existing intersection with Bathurst St.,
New driveway exit from the southern SMCSW TSE construction site to Pitt St south of the existing intersection with Bathurst St.,
Removal of parking spaces along Pitt St,
Relocation and removal of road furniture along Pitt St and Castlereagh St, coordination of utilities adjustments, line marking and stormwater drainage.
Figure 2-1 Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works (Image courtesy NSW Globe)
2.2 Previous road safety audit reports
No previous road safety audit reports were provided to the audit team.
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 7
3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
3.1 Commencement meetings
A commencement meeting was held on Thursday 16 November 2017 in the SMCS
TSE office. The issues discussed consisted of:
Approach to be adopted for the audit.
Material / Information to be provided for the Audit.
Scope of the Audit and the design disciplines related to this Audit.
Timeframe for conducting the Audit and Reporting.
3.2 Site inspection
A site inspection was conducted on Thursday 16 November 2017 between 3pm and
5pm. The weather conditions were clear and fine.
3.3 Examination of available materials
The Substantial detailed design stage (SDD) drawings listed below were made
available to the Road Safety Audit team for review.
Table 3-1 Examination materials provided
Drawing No Notes / Comments
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521501 COVER SHEET
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521502 SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521504 GENERAL NOTES
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521506 GENERAL LEGEND
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521507 DRAWING DELETED
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521510 OVERVIEW PLAN
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521511 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 1
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521512 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 2
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521551 DRIVEWAY DETAIL PLAN
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521561 DRIVEWAY SECTIONS
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521801 SIGNAGE AND LINEMARKING PLAN - STAGE 1 - SHEET 1
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521802 SIGNAGE AND LINEMARKING PLAN - STAGE 1 - SHEET 2
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521811 SIGNAGE SCHEDULE
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521881 EXISTING STREET LIGHTING PLAN
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521882 PROPOSED STREET LIGHTING PLAN
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521901 SWEPT PATH PLAN - SHEET 1
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521902 SWEPT PATH PLAN - SHEET 2
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523001 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - GENERAL UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 1
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523002 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - GENERAL UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 2
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523011 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 1
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523012 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 2
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523021 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - COMMUNICATIONS UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 1
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523022 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - COMMUNICATIONS UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 2
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523031 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 1
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523032 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 2
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523041 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - GAS UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 1
SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523042 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - GAS UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 2
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 8
3.4 Determination of risk
The following tables are extracted from the AGRS06/09 Austroads Road Safety Audit
Third Edition (2009) and are provided as background to the method by which the risk
rating attributed to each road safety audit finding has been determined.
Table 3-2 How often is the problem likely to lead to a crash?
Frequency Description
Frequent Once or more per week
Probable Once or more per year (but less than once a week)
Occasional Once every five or ten years
Improbable Less often than once every ten years
Table 3-3 What is the likely severity of the resulting crash type?
Severity Description Examples
Catastrophic Likely multiple deaths
High speed, multi-vehicle crash on freeway.
Car runs into crowded bus stop.
Bus and petrol tanker collide.
Collapse of a bridge or tunnel.
Serious Likely death or serious
injury
High or medium-speed vehicle/vehicle
collision.
High or medium-speed collision with a fixed
roadside object.
Pedestrian or cyclist struck by car.
Minor Likely minor injury
Some low-speed vehicle collisions.
Cyclist falls from bicycle at low speed.
Left-turn rear-end crash in slip lane.
Limited Likely trivial injury or
property damage only
Some low-speed vehicle collisions.
Pedestrian walks into object (no head injury).
Car reverses into post.
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 9
Table 3.4 Determination of risk
Frequent Probable Occasional Improbable
Catastrophic Intolerable Intolerable Intolerable High
Serious Intolerable Intolerable High Medium
Minor Intolerable High Medium Low
Limited High Medium Low Low
Table 3-5 The resulting level of risk
Risk Suggested treatment approach
Intolerable Must be corrected.
High Should be corrected or the risk significantly reduced, if the treatment cost is
high.
Medium Should be corrected or the risk significantly reduced, if the treatment cost is
moderate, but not high.
Low Should be corrected or the risk significantly reduced, if the treatment cost is
low.
These tables provide an indication of the level of risk and how to respond to it,
however, the guide also states that this is not a scientific system and professional
judgement should be used at all times. The risk rating for each road safety audit
finding has been included in the schedule of Road Safety Audit findings in Section 4.
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 10
4 AUDIT FINDINGS
Issues identified during the Road Safety Audit are discussed in this section.
It should be noted that the opinions expressed in the following sections are those of
the Road Safety Audit Team.
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 11
4.1 General
Ref
No. Audit Finding Risk Designer / Project Manager Response
4.1.1 Southern Site, Pitt St exit Driveway.
The exit movements from the southern site appear to clash with vehicles parked in the mail zone. Construction vehicles exiting the site could potentially crash with a vehicle parked in the mail zone.
Low The driveway has been relocated. This conflict no longer exist.
4.1.2 Northern Site, Pitt St existing entry/exit Driveway
The service vehicle exit movements from the northern site appear to clash with vehicles parked in the loading zone. Additionally, there appears to be limited road width available for 8.8m service vehicles to perform the exit manoeuvre.
Medium The driveway design shown in the SDD package is no longer relevant. The
demolition contractor has removed the parking bays and loading zone. This
configuration is proposed to be retained for these works.
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 12
Ref
No. Audit Finding Risk Designer / Project Manager Response
Construction vehicles exiting the site could potentially crash with a vehicle parking in the loading zone.
4.1.3 Northern Site, Pitt St existing entry/exit Driveway
The existing driveway shown in the survey appears to be in the wrong location. The actual existing driveway is located north of the driveway illustrated on the plans. The location of the existing driveway is marked in yellow in the illustration above.
Note Only. The location of the driveway is now surveyed. The driveway location will be
correctly shown on the updated drawings.
4.1.4 Northern Site, Castlereagh St entry/exit turning movements. Medium The turnpath will be updated to show the right turn from the through lane.
The Contractor will manage traffic as part of the Construction Traffic
Management Plan.
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 13
Ref
No. Audit Finding Risk Designer / Project Manager Response
The turning movements show the trucks starting from the right hand side lane, immediately after the last parking space. There appears to be a potential clash with a parked vehicle. It was observed during the site visit that there are long traffic queues during peak hour. The entering manoeuvre shown in the turn path would be unrealistic if access is required during the peak hours and no traffic control is provided.
4.1.5 Northern Site, Castlereagh St exit driveway. Medium The Contractor will manage traffic as part of the Construction Traffic
Management Plan.
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 14
Ref
No. Audit Finding Risk Designer / Project Manager Response
The turn path indicates that trucks exiting the site would need to turn into the second lane to perform the manoeuvre. As mentioned in issue 4.1.4, construction traffic exiting the site would potentially force their way into the heavy traffic in order to perform the indicated manoeuvre increasing the risk of collisions.
4.1.6 Northern Site, Castlereagh St entry/exit turning movements.
High. The construction vehicle traffic route will now travel along Castlereagh
Street. The right turn onto Park Street is no longer required.
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 15
Ref
No. Audit Finding Risk Designer / Project Manager Response
The traffic movements show trucks turning right from Castlereagh St to Park St from the through lane. Vehicles turning right are required to use the turning lane. Construction vehicles turning from the through lane could potentially clash with vehicles turning right from the turning lane.
4.1.7 Pedestrian Activity in both sites.
There is high pedestrian activity around both sites. The footpaths on Castlereagh St (northern site) and on Pitt St (southern site) are particularly narrow. Pedestrians could be potentially unaware of vehicles travelling in and out of these locations, increasing the risk of vehicle/pedestrian type crashes.
Medium. The Contractor will manage pedestrian traffic as part of the Construction
Traffic Management Plan.
SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works
Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 16
5 AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT
The Road Safety Audit was carried out by The Road Safety Audit Team using the
information made available to it. Every effort was made to ensure that all the safety
issues were considered.
The above Road Safety Audit findings and suggested actions are the opinion and the
judgement of The Road Safety Audit Team.
....................................................
Marcos Mejia – ID No: RSA-02-0576
Senior Road Safety Auditor – Level 3
Arcadis
....................................................
Daniel Talevski – ID No: RSA-02-0670
Senior Road Safety Auditor – Level 2
Arcadis
RSA-06741
Page 1 of 7 Pitt St Site Establishment
Road Safety Audit Report SHORT FORMAT
Title / Project Pitt St Site Establishment RSA P/L Reference RSA-06741 Work Package Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works Report Date 19 January 2018 Audit Stage Desktop Lead (Senior) Auditor
Secondary Auditor / Reviewer Anthea Jennings Chris Keramidas
Client John Holland CPB Ghella TMP / Drawings SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002284-B
Report Provider Road Safety Audits P/L
Desktop TMP Scope: The scope of the audit is to assess the plans on their merits and in the context of the road environment, not compliance-checking to standards and guidelines.
RSA-06741
Page 2 of 7 Pitt St Site Establishment
Pitt St Site Establishment T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion
John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:
Response
x Status
y Headers*****
1. Pedestrian: TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-0302 The plans show that the bus stop on Park St is still operating within the closed footpath area.
Patrons will be moving to/from a bus and theclosed footpath.
Pedestrians may try to cross the road midblock intothe closed footpath area in order to access thebus.
Clarify how the pedestrians will access the bus stop.
Traffic controllers will be on site to guide pedestrians to the nearest signalised crossing point
Closed
RSA-06741
Page 3 of 7 Pitt St Site Establishment
Pitt St Site Establishment T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion
John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:
Response
x Status
y Headers*****
2. Signage: In several locations, it is proposed to provide pedestrians with ‘Footpath closed – Use Other Footpath – Pedestrian arrow’ signage.
Consider simplifying the signage. Noted but this is not a road safety issued
Closed
RSA-06741
Page 4 of 7 Pitt St Site Establishment
Pitt St Site Establishment T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion
John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:
Response
x Status
y Headers*****
3. Delineation: TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301 Northbound Pitt St traffic will be reduced to one lane at the Park St intersection. Traffic will need to use the left lane after the intersection to proceed north of Park St (red circle). However, there is no clear warning of: 1. The construction site potentially in their path; or 2. The lane movement / arrangement ahead.
1. Ensure adequate protection and delineation of the work zone from through traffic. Important
2. Provide delineation similar to that proposed in TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-1201. Also refer to point 5 below.
The work zone has been removed as this is no longer required. The through movement on Pitt Street is as per normal movement
Closed
RSA-06741
Page 5 of 7 Pitt St Site Establishment
Pitt St Site Establishment T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion
John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:
Response
x Status
y Headers*****
4. Pedestrians: TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301 The work zone will be adjacent to the pedestrian crossings on both the north side and east side of the intersection.
There are no barriers / fencing or similar to prevent a pedestrian entering the site.
Ensue pedestrians can safety navigate the work zone or are prevented from entering the zone,
The work zone has been removed as this is no longer required. The pedestrian movement on Pitt Street is as per normal movement
Closed
RSA-06741
Page 6 of 7 Pitt St Site Establishment
Pitt St Site Establishment T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion
John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:
Response
x Status
y Headers*****
5. Delineation: TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1201 Northbound Pitt St through traffic is to use the left turn lane, through the intersection (red circle).
The left lane has left turn pavement arrows. A driver may be confused as to:
Whether they can proceed north; and
If so, which side of the bollards to drive.
Review signage and pavement markings. Drawing amended to allow movement from through lane – no requirement for lane closures south of Park Street
Closed
RSA-06741
Page 7 of 7 Pitt St Site Establishment
Explanatory Notes Short Format: This ‘short format’ report has been used by RSA P/L since 2008, initiated through requests by clients to assist their processes, for ease with stakeholders, and for timeliness. It is typically confined in use to construction traffic management and typically for discrete packages of plans / areas and often for large projects with repetitious small audit sections. The use of this format assumes that the reader/s know what a road safety audit is and how to respond to it. Projects: Audit points are often raised in projects in relation to: 1. specific themes (e.g. the use of a safety barrier type), or 2. the treatment of particular locations. Once key issues have been initially raised, they will not necessarily be re-raised in future audits. This will depend on the issue, the RSA’s perception of the client’s assessment and understanding of the issue, and other factors. Therefore, discrete audits as part of a project should be read and actioned by a project representative who is familiar with the audit history. Responding: Although the client receiving the report does not have to agree to the audit findings/suggestions, the issues and associated risks should be carefully considered. A written response should be made to all of the audit findings raised, then signed off by the responsible person from the project team. X
Response: The responder should fully or partially accept / reject the audit point and the comment / suggestion (i.e. not merely the suggestion) Y
Status: The status of the issue as it sits with the Project. i.e. ‘actioned’, ‘closed’, ‘pending information / further guidance’. Language: o Note: RSA P/L does not typically use the Austroads risk rating method, mostly because it can only be applied to some points and therefore can skew the perceived risk of other
points, and also due to it being a highly subjective approach, giving the false impression of objectivity.o ‘Urgent’ / ‘High-Risk’: Needs immediate attention / changes as per RSA suggestion or similar.o ‘Recommend’ / ‘Serious’ / ‘Important’: Must be robustly reviewed. Most likely requires a change to avoid a high-risk road environment for one or more user groups.o ‘Should’ / ‘Suggest’ / ‘Significant’: Based on the view of the RSA team the suggestion should be done, but it concedes that there could be reasons why inaction or alternative
action is equally correct. Must be robustly reviewed by contractor and where relevant key traffic engineering project stakeholders.o ‘Review’ / ‘Consider’: RSA is raising an observation but has no strong opinion on the outcome and need for changes. Project should review because it’s not an immediate and
high risk and may not be immediately obvious to RSA the reasons for the practice / setup / behaviour. May need monitoring.o ‘Minor’: Typically a low road-safety consequence / compliance issues (to guidelines or plans) / administrative controls. Unlikely to increase risk of crash.o ‘Note’: Little or no road safety significance. Typically added to give a complete picture of the design, site, context, analysis, auditors understanding.Intent of Issues Listing Order: Audit points might be clustered according to location, theme, or time. When this is not done and the audit comprises an uncategorised list of points, the key issues are often discussed first. However, there is no official ordering of points, and they should all be read on their merits and on the basis of the language guide above. References: Construction: 1. Austroads Guide to Road Safety – Road Safety Audit – 2009, 2. AS 1742.3 – 2009, 3. Road Management Act 2004 – Code of Practice – Worksite Safety – Traffic Management (2010), and Design: 4. Austroads guidelines and VicRoads supplements and technical publications as relevant. Safe System: Austroads guidelines encourage practitioners to adopt safe system principles within design and within road safety audits. Safe system (roads) calls for a design to not allow serious injury and fatalities to occur for the expected road users and the typical crash types expected for that design type. This design-objective is considered within this road safety audit as a ‘good practice’ objective. However, a road safety audit by definition does not have the aim of checking ‘Safe System conformance’. Process and Quality: RSA P/L’s quality assurance process is based on its senior auditors having a rich experience base, but also utilises customised checklists designed for niche areas in traffic engineering/road design (e.g. safety barriers, pavement shaping, CBD traffic management), in conjunction with a four-layer audit process: 1. on-site inspection; 2. media and data capture and review; 3. specialist / second auditor input; and (where warranted) 4. secondary blinded reviews. Audit Coverage: The audit has attempted to balance the safety needs of all road users. As per Austroads guidelines, the suggestions provided have attempted to be realistic/feasible and commensurate with the actual risk posed. Suggestions are made are from a safety perspective only, and are made in the absence of full project knowledge and design constraints. RSA P/L can provide a detailed risk assessment / issue evaluation report upon request. The audit raises potential safety risks noted / observed / anticipated by the audit team, and in particular the higher-risk issues. However, a road safety audit is fundamentally a subjective qualitative process undertaken by people, highly influenced by the experience, views and limitations of the individual team members. It is expected that the project team has competence to identify safety issues itself as the project progresses, and to ask the audit team further questions where necessary.
RE: Pitt Street North Site Operations - request for road safety auditor to provide comments
Hi Sue. If the only substantive change is as you have described in the email below, then I can confirm that there would be no ‘further’ road safety audit points raised. However, if you need me to check the actual TM thoroughly and provide a report, this would be days away due to current workload.
Regards.
Peter Harris|Manager and Principal AuditorRoad Safety Audits Pty Ltd
Suite 8|79 Manningham Road|Bulleen Victoria 3105
MIEAust CPEng | RPEQ |BE (Civil) | BB (Admin)
From: Sue Lewis Sent: Friday, 15 June 2018 4:49 PMTo: Peter Harris Subject: Fw: Pitt Street North Site Operations request for road safety auditor to provide comments
Pete
a couple of the reviewers have raised issues that the site establishment CTMP RSA is not relevant to the site operations phase - they have requested that you confirm in writing that this RSA is applicable - note that the same TCP, operations are proposed other than not allowing heavy vehicles to exit via the Pitt Street gate. Everything is packaged in the attachment
The RSA provided does not appear to be applicable to this CTMP and refers to Site Establishment. Is there an updated RSA which can be provided? Alternatively, is the Auditor able to confirm in writing that this is applicable and sufficient to cover this Site Operations CTMP?
Peter Harris Mon 18/06/2018 10:32 AM
To:Sue Lewis <
Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations
SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 21 of 21
Appendix 7 Review comments
Sydney Metro City and Southwest - CTMP - Pitt Street North Site Operations rev C
Good Morning Sue,
The City has reviewed the “Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations” rev C, 19 June 2018, and found it acceptable.
Kind regards,
Tony LyEngineering Traffic OfficerCity Infrastructure & Traffic Operations
____
Telephone: 02 9246 7861cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential or subject to legal privilege. If you receive this email and you are not the addressee (or responsible for delivery of the email to the addressee), please note that any copying, distribution or use of this email is prohibited and as such, please disregard the contents of the email, delete the email and notify the sender immediately. _______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tony Ly Thu 28/06/2018 10:33 AM
To:Sue Lewis ;
Cc:RAMIREZ Giovanny ; Brogan, Philip MELLA Carl A ; Van Le ; Asad Rajbhoy
Document:Version: B-00Date of review: 30/05/2018
Item No
Contract Contractor Doc RevRequirement Ref (COA
or REMM)Stakeholder Reviewer Date Item Description, Page, Para, Drg ref TfNSW comment Contractor Response
1 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018
First paragraph only mentions decommissioning of driveways. At the TCG of 22/05/18 decommissioning of water treatment plants was mentioned, and, will hoardings be removed/changed? Please clarify what is involved in decommissioning.
Document amended
2 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018"External works will see changes to the existing hoarding…" What are those changes? Is there any impact to traffic/pedestrians in making those changes?
Document amended
3 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Suggest adding a drawing/diagram/Appendix to help explain access points and parking
Document amended
4 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Last paragraph mentions the Sydney CBD Utilities Works CTMP. Wasn’t this CTMP for a specific period and specific set of works? Please add some clarity to the reference of this CTMP.
Document amended
5 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Suggest a copy and paste of any relevant information from previous CTMPs, into this section, makes it easier to review.
No change to document required
6 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018"per day" is used. What is the definition of a day, 24hrs, construction hours?
as noted in Table 1 - all hours
7 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018
Table 1 is titled "Peak vehicle movements per hour". The paragraph above Table 1 says 160 trucks per day which would be 320 truck movements. If this is the case the Heavy Vehicle column is incorrect as it totals 164 movements per day. It appears there is some confusion around trucks and movements, please clarify. Note: the above calculation assumes a "day" is 24 hours.
Document amended
8 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018
"The operation of the site will have an impact on the surrounding street system, however it is recognised that the traffic generation is well below EIS numbers." The numbers may be below but they will have an impact, what is the impact? How will it be mitigated?
Refer to Appendix 5
9 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018"...via the nominated vehicle crossing." Please clarify what and where the vehicle crossing is, and, how it will operate
Document amended
10 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 Section 3.2.6While other works and events that will occur are listed there is no discussion/analysis of the impacts or how it/they would be managed. Consider updating this section to show some analysis.
We do not manage other contractor impacts - that is the domain of SCO
11 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-521902Section 4.1 mentions 19m vehicles, but there are no 19m vehicles shown on this swept path drawing. Please update
Where they are unable to fit into site, as noted in Section 3.2.1
12 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Are all work vehicles and deliveries confined to the footpath? If not, will a lane closure be required?
No as noted in Appendix 3
13 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 Where is the alternate bus stop and how are pedestrians directed to it? via Signs provided by SCO
14 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401Signs shown on TCP suggest traffic controllers are not stopping traffic, if so, how are traffic controllers assisting pedestrians across Castlereagh St?
by finding suitable gaps
15 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-1401This TCP states that it will be used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401. If so, won't pedestrians be directed through the taper area? Please check and update as required
Drawing amended
16 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Are all work vehicles and deliveries confined to the footpath? If not will a lane closure be required?
Refer to response to Item 12
17 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018This TCP states that it will be used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301. If so, won't pedestrians be directed through the work area? Please check and update as required
No
18 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Between George St and Pitt St sign spacings are shown as 120m plus a 15m taper. The total distance, in this section, is only 90m (approx.). Review.
Drawing amended
19 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018How will works be protected from traffic? TCP currently only shows cones on the lane line.
Refer to Appendix 3
20 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018The bus lane EB is about 5m wide? If, as the note suggests, a 3.2m lane is maintained this only leaves 1.8m. Is this enough room for work area and work vehicles?
The bus lane width is greater than 5m
21 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0202Signs shown on TCP suggest traffic controllers are not stopping traffic, if so how are traffic controllers assisting pedestrians across Castlereagh St?
Refer to response to Item 14
Sydney Metro City & Southwest
TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-0302
TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301
CTMP - Pitt St North Site Operations
Stakeholder Comment Tracker
Section 3.1
Section 3.2
TCP-SPS-PAR-PITT-EB-PEDMGT-NBSB-000002
Section 3.2.1
RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action / information
22 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-2401This TCP states that it will be used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401. If so, won't pedestrians be directed through the taper area? Please check and update as required
Drawing amended
23 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 Road Safety Audits
The first Road Safety Audit included was undertaken in November 2017.
The second Road Safety Audit shown is for Pitt St Site Establishment and was undertaken in January 2018. This is an Operational CTMP.
A current road safety audit on this CTMP is required
Document amended
Pitt Street Site Operations
Printed copies are uncontrolled Page 1 of 1
CTMP Review Comments Sheet Project Title Sydney Metro City & south west –Tunnels and station excavation contract
CTMP Title: Pitt Street Site Operations Document Number: SMCSWTSE JCG SPS TM PLN 002285 B-
Reviewer: City of Sydney Tony Ly Responder: S Lewis Date:6 June 2018 Date:15 June 2018
Item Section/ Page Comments Response
1 4 “a combination of truck types will be used during the site establishment works. These trucks may be single unit, semi-trailers, bin trucks and 5t tippers”
Section refers to site establishment instead of site operations, 8.8 metre medium rigid vehicles are the largest vehicle approved to be used for the site operation phase based on the provided swept paths
Document amended to reflect site operations
Swept path drawing updated to show 10 wheel tippers. Note that semi-trailers will be used under lane/ parking area closure
2 4.1 “Material will be removed and delivered to site using a combination of vehicles. These trucks will range in size from 5.5m to 19.0m. Semi-trailer deliveries will occur out of hours”
See comment 1
Oversize and over-mass deliveries will be assessed through the oversize and over mass application, separate to the Construction Traffic Management Plan
Refer to response to Item 1
Yes, as noted in Section 3.2.9
Document: CTMP - Pitt Street North Site OperationsVersion: BDate of review: 31/05/2018
Item No Contract Contractor Doc Rev Requirement Ref (COA or REMM) Stakeholder Reviewer Date Item Description,
Page, Para, Drg ref RMS comment Contractor Response
1 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CM 31-May-2018 3.1
"External works will see changes to the existing hoarding to facilitate capping beam works within the site." Section 3.2.3 indicates that "During the hoarding works and the acoustic shed removal, pedestrians will be diverted from the affected footpaths during weekends or at night." However none of the TCPs are listed as applicable for hoarding works on the table in Appendix 3
Document amended
2 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CM 31-May-2018 3.2
"There will be approximately 5000 truck movements per month, during peak periods with 160 trucks per day." The numbers in Table 1 indicate this will be approximately 160 truck movements per day. Please confirm whether it is projected to be 160 trucks per day or 160 truck movements per day (equivalent to 80 trucks per day). If it is proposed to be 160 trucks per day, Table 1 will need to be amended to reflect the corresponding number of truck movements.
Document amended
3 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CM 31-May-2018 3.2.1
"The operation of the site will have an impact on the surrounding street system, however, it is recognised that the traffic generation is well below the EIS numbers." This statement appears to indicate that it is 160 truck movements proposed (80 trucks), as reflected in Table 1.
Irrespective of the numbers, apart from saying there will be an impact, this section does not discuss any detaiils regarding what the impact on traffic flows will actually be or any proposed meas res to mitigate an res lting impact
Refer to Appendix 5 and document amended
4 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CM 31-May-2018 App 3
TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301 - Park St between George St and Pitt St is only 90m. Signage spacing here shows 120m plus taper. Please review spacing of signs on this TCP through this section.
Drawing amended
5 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CM 31-May-2018 App 5
It is noted that the latest RSA report is for the Site Establishment stage of works. Confirmation from Road Safety Auditor that this RSA is applicable and sufficient to cover Site Operations should be included.
Noted
Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest
RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action / information
Document: CTMP ‐ Pitt St North Site Operations
Version: B
Date of
review:6/06/2018
Item No
Contract Contractor Doc RevItem Description, Page, Para, Drg
refStakeholder
Requirement Ref (COA or REMM)
TfNSW comment Contractor Response
1 TSE JHCPBG JV B 3.1 SCO
The CTMP referenced for Sydney CBD Utility
Works expires June 2018. Are these works
expected to continue throughout the site
operations phase of this site?
Document amended
2 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO
Section 3.1 states that light vehicles can use Pitt
St for access / egress, however Section 3.2.1
implies that heavy vehicles will use this for
access. Please confirm / update as appropriate
and suggest including some detail on when this
access may be used by heavy vehicles.
Document amended
3 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO
Please describe the impact site operations will
have on the surrounding road network. Are
there any mitigation measures which will be
implemented?
Document amended and refer to Appendix 5
4 TSE JHCPBG JV B 3.2.2 SCO
Where lane closures and bus stop closures are
required, please provide advance notice to SCO
so as bus stop signage can be prepared. A
minimum of 3 business days is required for this.
Noted
5 TSE JHCPBG JV B 5.3 SCO
Suggest presenting these works at the
fortnightly emergency services meeting
facilitated by SCO, and including a reference to
this meeting in the text.
Noted - this would form part of face to face discussions
Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest
3.2.1
RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC Closed
6 TSE JHCPBG JV B 5.4 - Table 2 SCO
Suggest including advance warning signage in
this section as it appears to be utilised during
works requiring lane and/or footpath closures.Document amended
7 TSE JHCPBG JV B 5.7 SCOIt may be beneficial to include the 24hr traffic
team phone number in this section as well. Document amended
8 TSE JHCPBG JV B 5.8 SCO
A number of other plans have been referenced
in this CTMP but have not been included here
e.g. White Bay and Pitt St Demolition. Should
these be included?
Document amended
9 TSE JHCPBG JV B DRG-521902 SCOPlease provide swept paths for the largest
vehicle intended to do these movements.
Section 4 implies this is a 19m semi‐trailer.
Semi trailer deliveries will be on street as they cannot perform this manoeuvre
10 TSE JHCPBG JV B TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401 SCO
Please consider repositioning the 'footpath
closed ahead' sign closer to the corner of Market
St to encourage pedestrians to use the signalised
crossing.
Drawing amended
11 TSE JHCPBG JV B TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0202 SCO
Barrier board appears to be missing from the
southern side of the footpath closure. Please
update to include.
Drawing amended
12 TSE JHCPBG JV B TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-1201 SCO
Please advise what will be used to help guide
motorists continuing through the intersection
into lane 2. The T5‐5 chevron sign may not be
enough.
Drawing amended
13 TSE JHCPBG JV B Appendix 4 SCOSeveral of the haulage routes do not align with
the EIS. Is an amendment and/or consistency
report required for this?
No MCoA E88 clearly states the approval pathway for haulage routes
14 TSE JHCPBG JV B Appendix 5 SCO
The RSA provided does not appear to be
applicable to this CTMP and refers to Site
Establishment. Is there an updated RSA which
can be provided? Alternatively, is the Auditor
able to confirm in writing that this is applicable
and sufficient to cover this Site Operations
CTMP?
Noted