Comparison of land usage of KNUBetween 2006 and 2010
2005014001 지리학과 강인수2006034284 경영학부 이동구
2008014028 지리학과 쳔하오
Contents
• Introduction– Reason why chose the Subject– Introduce about KNU
• Main Subject– Comparison 2006 & 2010 KNU– Automatic analysis + Individual analysis– Field Survey– Result analysis
• Conclusion– How to use the result– Power of Remote Sensing
INTRO- Many buildings are being built in KNU
INTRO- Many buildings are being built in KNU
INTRO- Many buildings are being built in KNU
INTRO
• There are many small and big changes in KNU
• Entrance of Global Plaza, BTL Dorm, Techno building, East gate – Law school, extension of College of social science and so on
• By using the remote sensing tool, we will figure out how many changes are done
About KNU
• Kyungpook National UniversitySlogan : Truth · Pride · Service Establishment : 1946. 5.28Type : NationalPresident : Ham, In sukNation : Republic of KoreaLocation : Gyeongbuk National Univ., Sangyeok 3-dong, Buk-gu, Daegu, Korea (Main campus)The number of student : undergraduate -28,170(2010)graduate school : 6,640 (2010) Teaching staff : 1,118 (2010) Symbol : Cheomseongdae
About KNU
Main Subject
• Comparison of land usage of KNU be-tween 2006 and 2010
2006 KNU
2010 KNU
2006 KNU vs 2010 KNU
Comparison 2006 & 2010 KNUcolor Type
green Forest
grey Road
brown Building
Light brown Open space
blue Water
Field Survey
BIG 5 Changes
1. Entrance of Techno Building and BTL dor-mitory
BTL dormitory
Techno Building
Techno Building
BIG 5 Changes
2. Global Plza (GP)
Global Plaza
BIG 5 Changes
3. East Gate+ extension of College of social sci-ence + Entrance of Law school
BIG 5 Changes
4. Entrance of parking lot at college of IT Engineer-ing 2
BIG 5 Changes
5. Faculty Apartment
Comparison 2006 & 2010 KNU
Raster Attribute Editor 2006 & 2010 KNU
Comparison 2006 & 2010 KNU
2006• forest : 43.12 %
• road : 25.18 %
• water : 0.46 %
• open : 8.65 %
• building : 22.59%
• Total : 100 %
2010• forest : 38.93 %
• road : 27.48 %
• water : 0.45 %
• open : 8.40 %
• building : 24.74 %
• Total : 100 %* Round off at three decimal places
Comparison 2006 & 2010 KNU
Forest43%
Road25%
Water0%
Open9%
Building23%
2006 KNU
Forest39%
Road27%
Water0%
Open8%
Building25%
2010 KNU
Conclusion
• Thanks to the Remote Sensing tool, We can display very objective fig-
ures how changed the usage of land by entrance of buildings in KNU
• Compared to the field survey, • It is convenient to access the spot. If field survey can’t approach the
spot, but remote sensing can
Conclusion
• Fast, objective, save money & time.• Very useful to keep the information• Remote Sensing is very powerful tool• It can be used many kinds of infor-
mation
