Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Limited Please read the analyst certification, company disclosure and disclaimer in the last page 1
China New Town Development中国新城镇 (1278 HK)
New town for a new dream
China New Town Development (CNTD) has finally shrugged off its financial burden and troubled legacies to become an investment-oriented urbanization play. Now being a primary listed new-town development platform for China Development Bank Capital (CBDC), it enjoys low-cost funding endorsement and nation-wide project sourcing from CBDC and we believe its earning will first recover and then resume long-term growth as its balance sheet expands to support new investments. We see re-rating catalyst for this developing transformation. Initiate BUY with target price of HK$0.33 for 32% upside down the road.
Identity changed from a Non-SOE to a SOE company. Upon share placing completion in 2013, CDBC, which is the wholly-owned new-town investment arm of China Development Bank (CDB), became largest shareholder of CNTD with controlling stake of 54.32%. Thus, CNTD has transformed from a non-SOE to a SOE. The network of CDBC and influencing power of CDB let CNTD negotiate better terms with local governments.
Business model transforming from a primary developer to a project investor. CNTD is transforming from a primary land developer to an urban development project investor. Major source of income changed from land sales which is highly volatile, to project investment income, of which return is fixed and guaranteed by local governments. Under the new business model, we expect CNTD to turnaround from loss-making in FY13-14 to profit-making in FY15E.
Key driver: Leveraging on low cost funding to grow investment assets size. Thanks to background of CDB group, CNTD is able to gear up its investment return via issuing mid-term loan note and establishing umbrella trust at favorable interest rate. Return on investment can be geared up to >50% p.a.
New project flow subject to macro-economic risks. Major risk of CNTD’s new business model is high dependency on a stable project flow for supporting momentum of investment income growth. The lukewarm economy may slow down urban development pace in short term.
Initiate with Buy. CNTD is trading at 0.6x FY15E P/B in the counter. After deducting illiquid land assets, we estimated its adjusted book value to be RMB1,965mn, or HK$0.236 per share, which is equal to 94% of current trading price. Our target price for CNTD is HK$0.33, which is equal to 20% discount to our estimated fair value based on DCF model. Initiate BUY to CNTD.
Investment Summary FY-end Dec 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E
Revenue (RMBmn) 608 57 - 261 269
Growth (%) (90.7) - - 3.0 Net profit (RMBmn) (213) (61) 35 140 208
Growth (%) 71.2 - 302.2 48.2 EPS (RMBcent) (4.7) (0.6) 0.4 1.4 2.1
Growth (%) 86.8 - 302.2 48.2 P/E (x) - - 59.4 14.8 10.0 P/B (x) 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 EV/EBITDA (x) 10.6 169.9 18.9 7.1 5.3 DPS (RMBcent) - - - - 2.1 Yield (%) - - - - 10.0
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
BUY
Share Price Target Price
HK$0.25 HK$0.33
China / Real Estate / Property
15 February 2016
Steve Wong
(852) 3519 1292
Latest Key Data Total shares outstanding (mn) 9,846
Market capitalization (HK$mn) 2,462
Enterprise value (HK$mn) 2,500
12M daily turnover (HK$mn) 0.6
12M volatility (%) 66.0
RoE avg FY14-16E (%) 0.9
P/B FY16E (x) 0.6
Net debt/equity FY16E (%) Net cash
Performance (%) 1M YTD 12M
Absolute (3.85) (13.79) (36.71)
Relative to HSI 3.22 2.61 (11.72)
Major Shareholders (%)
China Development Bank Corporation 54.3
SRE Group Ltd (1207 HK) 14.9
Auditor
Ernst & Young
Price Chart
Turnover (HK$mn) Price (HK$)
Source: Bloomberg, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
15-Feb 15-May 15-Aug 15-Nov 16-Feb
CNTD HSI
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 2
Urbanization, the key driver for primary development …
CNTD established as a new town developer in China, which used to focus on primary land
development. Primary land development (or primary development) is a process of
turning land sites from bare land into valuable residential and commercial sites. It is
essential step before the series of construction process for new town development or old
town re-development. The faster the urban population growth, the larger the demand
for new town development and old town re-development, and the faster the investment
placing on primary land development is. CNTD is one of the few primary development
company listed in Hong Kong.
Benefit from China’s urbanization in long term
China aims to grow population in urban area, and targets to have urbanization rate at
60% by 2020. We believe it to be one of major tasks of the 13th Five-Year Plan (FYP).
Influx of rural population to urban areas triggered from urbanization lead to high
congestion and living problem. It creates need for new town development for absorbing
the growing urban population. Furthermore, economic growth will transform an old city
to be commercial center. Therefore re-development project is urged to be carried out for
upgrading the obsolete infrastructure facilities, residential and commercial properties. All
these will boost the demand for primary development.
Mega-city clusters development speeds up China’s urbanization
China government promotes integration for the seven major city clusters (namely
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei; Zhong-yuan; Yangtze River Delta Economic Zone; Pearl River Delta
Economic Zone; Middle Yangtze River Region; Chengdu-Chongqing and Northeast China)
for creating synergy from optimization of city spatial structure and management layout.
We believe it will speed up urbanization, and hence the investment for corresponding
development projects. Besides, with recovery on China’s property market, we believe
property sales situation will be stabilized, especially in higher tier cities. All these are
expected to support demand for urbanization and primary land development in the
middle to long term.
Figure 2: Urbanization plans of the seven major city clusters A
B
Source: Media, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 3: Total sales revenue from primary land development in FY10-14 for major players listed in HK
A
Company Primary land development
revenue
As % of total sales
revenue (RMBmn) (%) CNTD (1278 HK) 3,284 88.26 China Vast (6166 HK) 2,857 54.19 Jinmao (817 HK)^ 15,132 18.82 CCCC (1800 HK) 54,890 3.52
Note^: Denominated in HK$mn
Source: Companies data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 1: Urbanization rate and urban population in China
A
B
Source: NBSC, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Northeast China
12th FYP 13th FYP
Harbin urbanization 63% 70% Changchun urbanization 61% 68%
Yangtze River Delta Economic Zone
12th FYP 13th FYP
Shanghai population 24.8mn 26.5mn Nanjing urbanization 80% 83% Jiangsu urbanization 60% 72%
Pearl River Delta Economic Zone
12th FYP 13th FYP
Guangdong urbanization 67.76% 73%
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei
12th FYP 13th FYP
Beijing population 21.7mn 23mn Tianjin population 14.7mn 18mn Shijiazhuang urbanization 49.3% 60%
Zhongyuan
12th FYP 13th FYP
Henan urbanization 43.8% 56%
Chengdu-Chongqing
12th FYP 13th FYP
Chengdu urbanization 70.3% 77% Chongqing urbanization 58.34% 65%
Middle Yangtze River Region
12th FYP 13th FYP
Wuhan urbanization 67.6% 84% Changsha urbanization 70% 81%
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 3
… But new-town development is subject to long-cycle risk
Long development cycle increases risk exposure from change of economic cycle
A primary land development project could last for 8-10 years or even longer, which is
likely to cross two generations of senior government officers. Pace of urban development
and land sales schedule are highly dependent on governments’ development strategy
which is subject to change from time to time. Change of urban development strategy
driven by change of government cabinet may affect the project return when investment
time horizon gets longer. Besides, land sales situation is also dependent on property
market sentiment. The lukewarm property market will discourage secondary property
developer from land acquisition. In short, demand for land will become weak during
tepid property market, while supply of land will be curbed by government’s cooling
policy during hot property market. Under these circumstances, both too hot and too cool
of the property market will cause negative effect on earnings performance to primary
land developer. It is the major drawback of primary land development business.
Five-Year
Plan (FYP)
Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
Real GDP
Growth8.4% 8.3% 9.1% 10.0% 10.1% 11.3% 12.7% 14.2% 9.6% 9.2% 10.6% 9.5% 7.7% 7.7% 7.3% 6.9% 6.5% 6.3% 6.1% 6.0% 6.0%
+/- +/- +/- + +/- -- -- -- + + -- -- -- -- + + + +/- +/- +/- +/-
Pro
pe
rty
con
firm
ed
as
pil
lar
ind
ust
ry
Au
ctio
n /
lis
tin
g /
ten
de
r fo
r al
l la
nd
sal
es
Be
gin
nin
g o
f p
rop
ert
y
tigh
ten
ing
90
/70
po
licy
Do
wn
pay
me
nt
rais
ed
for
2+
ho
me
Sup
po
rt m
eas
ure
aft
er
pro
pe
rty
mar
ket
cras
h
Sup
po
rt m
eas
ure
con
tin
ue
d
Do
wn
pay
me
nt
and
len
din
g re
stri
ctio
n
Furt
he
r ti
ghte
nin
g;
ho
me
pu
rch
ase
re
stri
ctio
n
Tigh
ten
ing
con
tin
ue
d
“Fiv
e p
oli
cie
s an
d
me
asu
res”
to c
on
tro
l
soar
ing
real
est
ate
Re
laxi
ng
rest
rict
ion
po
lici
es
and
eas
ing
Ho
me
Lo
ans
Residential
sales
(RMBbn)
357 463 572 767 1,038 1,758 2,083 2,989 2,507 4,436 5,272 5,859 6,446 8,143 7,629 8,819 9,701 10,671 11,739 12,912 14,204
Growth
(% YoY)30.10 29.40 23.70 34.10 30.00 26.90 18.50 42.10 (19.50) 75.50 18.30 12.10 10.00 26.30 (6.30) 15.60 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
National
Home Price
(RMBpsm)
2,103 2,226 2,291 2,379 2,714 3,168 3,367 3,864 3,800 4,681 5,032 5,357 5,791 6,237 6,324 6,821 7,162 7,520 7,896 8,291 8,706
Growth
(% YoY)4.92 5.85 2.93 3.82 14.09 16.72 6.29 14.77 (1.66) 23.19 7.51 6.45 8.10 7.71 1.38 7.87 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Land sales
revenue
(RMBbn)
95 146 205 257 290 332 487 600 602 1,000 1,153 1,210 1,350 1,746 1,781 1,870 1,963 2,061 2,165 2,273
Growth
(% YoY)53.70 40.22 25.85 12.82 14.24 46.87 23.03 0.47 66.01 15.27 4.97 11.58 29.31 2.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Policy on
Real Esate
Market
+ easing
-
tightening
+/- neutral
Pre
lim
inar
y
com
mo
dit
y h
ou
sin
g
de
velo
pm
en
t st
age
Senior
Gov't
Officers
10th FYP 11th FYP
President
Hu Jintao
Premier
Wen Jiabao
President
Xi Jinping
Premier
Li Keqiang
To stabilize property market
and land sales revenue for
supporting government
expenditure under lukewarm
economy
Furt
he
r e
asin
g H
om
e
Loan
s an
d l
ow
er
do
wn
pay
me
nt
rati
o
12th FYP 13th FYP
12th
FYP 13th
FYP
Urbanization rate 56.1% 60.0%
Urban population 771mn 855mn
With release of “National New-type Urbanization Plan” by State Council in 2014, urbanization became a main driver of China’s economic growth in coming FYP
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 4
Intensive capital a high hurdle for primary land developer
As primary land developer, after conducting feasibility studies, CNTD would set up joint
venture project company with local governments. After that, CNTD involved in every
aspect of the corresponding development process ranging from drawing up detailed
development plans and land clearing to setting up infrastructure and public facilities and
commercial properties.
Primary development, a more capital intensive business vs. secondary development
Land clearing, relocating and resettling incumbent residents and businesses are the most
time consuming and capital intensive. These processes required high input of capital
expenditure. In the meanwhile, unlike secondary development, primary development
project is unable to make pre-sales. It implies that no significant amount of cash will flow
in primary land developer before completion of the project.
Furthermore, due to complexity of land clearing process, development cycle of primary
land development project is longer than that of secondary property development. Entry
barrier of primary development industry is higher. Against these backdrops, usually,
primary land development will be carried out by operation arms of local government
because of their: 1) fundraising capability, and 2) strong bonding with land clearing
authority.
Figure 4: Primary and secondary development project Primary land development project
Secondary property development project
B
Source: Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 5: New town development cycle Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Stage 2 (1 months) Co-development agreement with local governmental authority
Stage 3 (1-2 months) Formation of joint venture company
Stage 4 (3-6 months) Project design and plan approval
Stage 1 (4 months) Site selection and master planning and feasibility report
Stage 6 (1.5-3 years) Relocation and resettlement for incumbent residents and businesses
Stage 7 (4-8 years) Site clearance, infrastructure establishment and construction of facilities
Stage 8 (Subject to gov’t plan) Sale of land use rights
Stage 5 (Continuous throughout the project) Seeking financing
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 5
A complete look at primary versus secondary development
Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3
High initial CAPEX for primary development Primary land development:
High initial CAPEX at early stage, including expenditures for clearing & leveling land and building of necessary infrastructure
No presale for primary land development
No significant cash inflow at beginning stage Secondary property development:
Relatively low CAPEX at early stage, which mainly coming from land acquisition
Pre-sales can be carried out before project completion
Better liquidity for secondary property development project
Primary land development:
High initial CAPEX at early stage, including expenditures for clearing & leveling land and building of necessary infrastructure
No presale for primary land development
No significant cash inflow at beginning stage Secondary property development:
Relatively low CAPEX at early stage, which mainly coming from land acquisition
Pre-sales can be carried out before project completion
Better liquidity for secondary property development project
Figure 6: Primary land development vs. secondary property development
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Long development cycle for primary development Primary land development:
Transformation from bare land into valuable residential and commercial sites is time consuming.
Demolition of existing structures and construction could be complicated if incumbent residents and businesses refuses to relocate voluntarily
The whole development cycle can be lasted for 5-8 years, or even longer
Secondary property development:
Construction period of residential and commercial building from well-established site is relatively short
The whole secondary development cycle is 2-3 years
Primary land development:
Transformation from bare land into valuable residential and commercial sites is time consuming.
Demolition of existing structures and construction could be complicated if incumbent residents and businesses refuses to relocate voluntarily
The whole development cycle can be lasted for 5-8 years, or even longer
Secondary property development:
Construction period of residential and commercial building from well-established site is relatively short
The whole secondary development cycle is 2-3 years
Relatively low controllability for primary development Primary land development:
Primary land development project is initiated by local government
Land sales schedule and amount are subject to approval from government authorities
Profit sharing scheme from land sales to primary developer is decided by local government, which is subject to change from time to time
Secondary property development:
Project selection is more flexible for secondary developer
Property sales schedule is controllable for developer
Profit sharing scheme from property sales is fixed at beginning
Primary land development:
Primary land development project is initiated by local government
Land sales schedule and amount are subject to approval from government authorities
Profit sharing scheme from land sales to primary developer is decided by local government, which is subject to change from time to time
Secondary property development:
Project selection is more flexible for secondary developer
Property sales schedule is controllable for developer
Profit sharing scheme from property sales is fixed at beginning
High initial CAPEX for primary development Primary land development:
High initial CAPEX at early stage, including expenditures for clearing & leveling land and building of necessary infrastructure
No presale for primary land development
No significant cash inflow at beginning stage Secondary property development:
Relatively low CAPEX at early stage, which mainly coming from land acquisition
Pre-sales can be carried out before project completion
Better liquidity for secondary property development project
Primary land development:
High initial CAPEX at early stage, including capital expenditures for clearing & leveling land and building of necessary infrastructure
No presale for primary land development
No significant cash inflow at beginning stage Secondary property development:
Relatively low CAPEX at early stage, which mainly coming from land acquisition
Pre-sales can be carried out before project completion
Better liquidity for secondary property development project
Low cash flow visibility for primary development
Primary land development:
Potential increment on CAPEX for land clearing during negotiation with incumbent residents and businesses
owner
High fluctuation on land sales which could be zero for years
Land buyers are mainly secondary developers, and it is subject to more factors such as land bank abundance
Secondary property development:
Payment of land premium is fixed at beginning, and construction cost for residential/commercial building is
highly visible
Fluctuation of property sales is relatively lower
Directly sell to end-users
Primary land development:
Potential increment on CAPEX for land clearing during negotiation with incumbent residents and businesses owner
High fluctuation on land sales which could be zero for years
Land buyers are mainly secondary developers, and it is subject to more factors such as land bank abundance
Secondary property development:
Payment of land premium is fixed at beginning, and construction cost for residential/commercial building is highly visible
Fluctuation of property sales is relatively lower
Directly sell to end-users
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9
Cash flow for primary land development Cash flow for secondary property development
One cycle lasting for 8-10 years, or
even longer
3-4 cycles in 10 years
V.S.
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 6
Figure 7: Land sales history of CNTD Year Land
area sold Land
premium ASP
(sqm) (RMBmn) (RMBpsm) FY07 169,215 427 2,523 FY08 607,536 1,173 1,930 FY09 334,162 2,025 6,060 FY10 398,468 2,526 6,339 FY11 35,642 538 15,095 FY12 187,750 1,121 5,971 FY13 110,022 1,350 12,270 FY14 14,046 125 8,864 9M15 - - N/A
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Weak earnings performance triggering assets disposal
Although primary development is benefited from urbanization policy in China and
incentive from economic gain of re-development, the associated risks will hold back
attractiveness of land development project. We consider the major risk is low visibility on
land auction in future.
High dependency on local governments’ development plans
Return on primary land development is derived from sale of land use rights in the new
towns being developed. However, the amount of available land for sale is subject to
approval from the relevant governmental authority. As urban development plans is
subject to change from time to time, there is no assurance about the exact timing of land
sale or the final price at which land use rights are sold. The instability of primary land
development business caused poor assets return and weak cash flow to CNTD in past few
years. The Company made net loss in five years and has cumulative net loss of RMB
1.18bn during FY07-14.
Weak and high fluctuation on cash flow led high gearing
Revenue was highly fluctuated during FY07-14 due to uncontrollable land sale schedule
of local governments, so as to selling price of the corresponding land parcels. Land area
sold during the year to third parity property developers was fluctuated from 14,046 sqm
to 607,536 sqm. Furthermore, due to weak cash inflow and heavy capital intensive at
beginning stage of primary development project, gearing of CNTD was hiking in FY07-13.
The corresponding financial cost eroded all of profit from land sales.
Disposal of low profit margin businesses
Due to immaturity of its new town development projects and ancillary facilities
operation businesses, such as hotels, hospitals and convention centers, CNTD has
decided to dispose the unprofitable assets since 2013. It lowered the net gearing to 2.6%
at end-2014. Upon completion of the series of assets disposal activities, only two major
assets left: Shanghai Luodian project and Shenyang Lixiang project.
Figure 8: Weak cash flow and high gearing Figure 9: Instability of earnings from sales of land A
B
A
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Net gearing dropped in FY10 due to IPO in HK
Net gearing dropped significantly after assets disposal
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 7
Shanghai Luodian project, a model town for CNTD
Shanghai Luodian is a typical new town development project. In order to alleviate
congestion in downtown of Shanghai, the city government launched a development plan,
named “One City, Nine Towns”. The plan was established to encourage each of the local
governments in the nine districts to develop one experimental new town for encouraging
residents to move out of downtown Shanghai. Luodian Project is one of the “Nine Towns”,
which located in Baoshan. Total saleable land area is 2.3m sqm, and remaining land area
available to sell is 0.6m sqm. It is connected with downtown by Shanghai Metro Line No.
7. It takes 30min to reach city center of Shanghai. The Project became the economic
center of Northern Baoshan.
The project is started in 2002 when CNTD entered into JV agreement with local
government. After ten years development, a series of ancillary facilities such as hotels,
hospitals, schools, and shopping area, have been established. In 2010, Shanghai Metro
Line 7 was extended to Luodian New Town. All these lead the project to successfully
attract top-tier property developers, such as Sino-Ocean, Cinda, Vanke and Jingrui.
As most of initial CAPEX mainly for land clearing and infrastructure development has
been invested, no significant CAEPX is expected for the project in future. The project has
entered harvesting stage. We believe it is the major reason on which CNTD want to retain
it from the Assets Disposal scheme.
Figure 10: Map and facts of Luodian A
Summary Luodian project: Key facts CNTD’s interest 72.6% Profit sharing ratio 48.0% Completion rate 96.0%
Total salable land 2.27mn sqm Remaining land available 0.6mn sqm Latest selling price RMB 8,850psm
Total area in Luodian 44.2 sq.km Site area of Luodian project 6.8 sq.km
Population in Luodian 52,860 citizens Economic value (in 2014) RMB 6,064mn Financial income to gov’t RMB 612mn
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 11: New town development of Luodian Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
New town development
Secondary developers
Golf course
Hospital
Hotel
Shopping mall
Ancillary facilities
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 8
Figure 12: Historical land sales of Luodian A
Year Month Site Area Price ASP (sqm) (RMBmn) (RMBpsm)
FY14 Jun 14,046 125 8,864 FY13 Mar 110,022 1,350 12,270 FY12 Oct 37,209 234 6,289 Nov 34,558 279 8,073 Nov 53,838 533 9,900 FY11 Jan 35,642 538 15,095 FY10 Aug 43,326 523 12,071 Aug 107,825 1,377 12,771 FY09 Apr 96,842 422 4,362 Sep 102,246 1,400 13,692 FY08 Jan 82,529 368 4,459 Aug 62,859 321 5,107 Aug 29,966 167 5,562 FY07 Nov 120,595 350 2,902
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Luodian project good for retained
According to National Bureau of Statistics of the PRC of China (NBSC), total residential
property sales in China was up 14.4% YoY in 2015 to RMB 8.7trn, while that in Shanghai
was up 45.6% YoY. Total land purchase cost in China was RMB1.8trn, up 1.2% YoY in 2015,
while that in Shanghai was up 15.0% to RMB 100bn. We see recovery on both land
purchase and residential sales in Shanghai are outpacing.
Going forward, we believe China’s government to roll out more measures to reduce
inventory in property sector in 2016. De-stocking of property market may hold back new
starts of property development in Shanghai in short term. Nevertheless, strong demand
for residential in Shanghai is expected to be growth driver in middle term. Furthermore,
in our view, well establishment of western area and commencement in operation of
Meilan Lake subway station will be good support for land sales volume and selling price
in western area of Luodian. It will benefit sales situation in medium term.
Management expectation: Six year to sell the stock
After discussing with management, we expect the sale schedule for land parcels of
Luodian is relatively promising. Completion ratio for Luodian project is 96%. We assume
remaining land parcels in Luodian to be sold in coming eight to ten years due to well
establishment of Luodian.
Figure 13: Land transaction in Shanghai Figure 14: Property transaction in Shanghai A
B
A
B
Source: NBSC, Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Source: Centraline, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 15: Land purchases growth in Shanghai vs. China, 2013-15 Figure 16: Residential sales growth in Shanghai vs. China, 2013-15
A
B
A
B
Source: NBSC, Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Source: NBSC, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 9
Figure 17: Map and facts of Lixiang A
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
But Shenyang project was another story: too poor to sell
Shenyang is one of the key cities within the Pan Bohai Rim Economic Region and an
economic and trade center of Northeastern China. Lixiang Project is located within Da
Hun Nan area, which is 25km from Shenyang’s city center and adjacent to Shenyang
Taoxian International Airport. Under the strategic plan of Dahunnan area, a new
administrative, cultural and transportation centers of Shenyang will be situated in the
Dahunnan area. The project is positioned as new town of recreational city for developing
tourism including modern agriculture, entertainment and F&B.
Leveraging with China Development Bank’s connection, we expect CNTD to have better
support from local government. Nevertheless, poor property market environment in
Liaoning creates headwind for land sales of the project in future. According to
management, CNTD will not put much emphasis on land sales of the project.
Situation of Lixiang, not as good as Shanghai
Unlike Shanghai, land sales situation in Shenyang is far more negative. According to NBS
of Shenyang, total residential sales in Shenyang was RMB 56bn, plunged by 28.8% YoY in
2015. Land sales in Shenyang dropped 51.9% YoY to RMB 8bn in 2015 according to
Ministry of Land and Resources of Shenyang, which is far below from peak in 2011-13.
The demand for real estate in Northeast China has been weakening due to sluggish local
economic growth. Going forward, we believe coal and commodity price to remain tepid
in 2016, and local economy is less likely to have a significant rebound in short future.
Large uncertainty on the project, assume no sales in coming years
The Shenyang Project was originally planned to be completed by 2015. Nevertheless, no
progress had been made since 2009, and completion rate of the project is remained at
45% as of end-2015. We believe recovery will not be significant under slow growth in
manufacturing activities, and it will bring a larger uncertainty on turnaround of local
property sales situation. In our model, we assume no sales to be made in coming three
years from Lixiang project.
Figure 18: Land transaction in Shenyang Figure 19: Property transaction in Shenyang A
B
A
B
Source: Ministry of Land and Resources of Shenyang, Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Source: NBS of Shenyang, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 10
Figure 20: Outstanding loan of CDB A
B
Source: CDB, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Big change #1: CDBC taking control, new era of CNTD
The Company announced share subscription of Chin Development Bank Capital (CDBC)
via a wholly-owned subsidiary, named China Development Bank International Holding
Limited, on Mar 18, 2013. Upon completion of share placing in Mar 2014, CDBC became
the largest shareholder of CNTD with controlling stake of 54.32%.
China Development Bank (CDB) is a policy bank, which provides medium to long term
financing facilities to government projects of national priority for supporting economic
development in China. It is under the direct jurisdiction of the State Council. The balance
of loans to urbanization projects by CDB reached RMB 4.1trn, accounted for 75% of total
CDB’s RMB loans.
CDBC is a wholly-owned by CDB. It is the direct investment arm of CDB. CDBC is
committed to provide integrated solutions for urbanization and development project in
China. It partners with local governments’ investment platforms for developing
businesses along urban development value chains.
Transformation to project investment-oriented company
CNTD became listing platform of CDBC for investing on urban development project in
China. The Company will combine its expertise in primary land development and urban
operations with CBDC’s investment and financial strength to provide integrated new
town development solution to local governments.
Upon being taken control by CDBC, CNTD transformed from Non State-owned primary
land development executor to State-owned urbanization project investor. Thanks to
support of CDB and CDBC, CNTD has stronger bargaining power to negotiate with local
governments such that it can get favorable terms for investing on the projects. Nanjing
Yuhaitai re- development project is the first project intake of CNTD after its
transformation. The Company is able to earn guaranteed fixed return rate with clear
profit distribution schedule and exit arrangement from the project. For more details,
please refer to later part of this report. Besides, by leveraging on background of CDB,
CNTD is able to source low cost funding. The Company successfully issued RMB 1.3bn
Senior Guaranteed Notes at 5.5% interest rate in 2015. We believe that liquidity is no
longer a restriction for CNTD.
Figure 22: Comparison on CNTD before and after CDBC taking control
A
Before After Ownership Non-SOE SOE Business model Primary
project executor
Project investor
Major source of income
Profit sharing from land sales
Guaranteed return from project investment
Earnings visibility
Low High
Cost of funding High (6-8%) Low (<6%) Return risk High Low Investment horizon
Long (8-10 yrs)
Short (<5 yrs)
B
Source: Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
CAGR: 18.3%
Figure 21: Relationship of CDB, CDBC and CNTD with local governments
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Local government
Investment platforms
Urban development projects
New town development/Old town re-development and Infrastructure construction, such as Power projects, Roadway construction, Railway, construction, water conservancy projects
Owning
JV Company
Investing
Capital Contribution
Capital Contribution
Capital Contribution & seek further cooperation
CDBC
Investment arm of CDB for partnering with local gov’t on investing in urban development projects
CNTD
Listing platform of CDBC for investing in urban development project & seeking further cooperation
Controlling Stake
CDB
Policy bank providing financing facilities to local government for urban development
Loans
Project executor
Outsource development works, such as land clearing & leveling and infrastructure construction
Tender
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 11
Big change #2: asset disposal turning trash to cash
Disposal Master Agreement in Oct 2013 for RMB 2.07bn
CNTD and SREI entered into a Disposal Master Agreement in Oct 2013 together with
announcement on share Subscription of CDBC. According to the agreement, CNTD would
sell a series of assets to SREI for consideration of RMB 2.07bn. Such consideration is
payable in cash in five installments within 24 months from March 2014 (completion date
of CDBC Subscription). Most of the assets being disposed are low profitability, which was
used to be burden of CNTD. Upon completion of disposal, on one hand, CNTD can lower
burden from saving the corresponding operating expenses estimated at ~RMB 100mn
per year. On the other hand, proceeds from liquidation of the assets can be redeployed.
Disposal of Wuxi project group in Dec 2014 for RMB 1.1bn
CNTD announced in Dec 2014 to sell Wuxi Project Group, which consists of both SREI
Disposal Assets and Non-SREI Disposal Asset, to Wuxi government for RMB 1.1bn. The
transaction is with the consent of SREI. It further downsized primary development assets
of CNTD.
Disposal of 30% of stake on Changchun New Town in Nov 2015 for RMB 66mn
The Company announced in Nov 2015 to sell 30% stake of Changchun New Town to
Administrative Committee of Changchun Automotive Economic-Technology Development
Zone for RMB 66mn. Upon completion of the disposal, stake holding of CNTD on
Changchun New Town will drop to 50%.
Two major assets remained: Luodian, Shanghai & Lixiang, Shenyang
Two major assets are retained in the Company after series of assets disposal activities:
primary land development for Luodian in Shanghai and Lixiang in Shenyang. Based on
assumption on ASP for Luodian and Lixiang of RMB 8,850psm and RMB 740psm,
respectively, we estimate fair value for these two assets to be RMB 8.2bn. Nevertheless,
because of weak liquidity of SREI, no more installment payment was made after receipt
of the first payment.
Figure 23: Cash value unlocked A
Item Proceeds (RMBbn) Disposal Master Agreement in Oct 2013
2.07
Disposal of Wuxi project group
1.10
30% of Changchun New Town 0.07 Less: overlapping 0.60
Cash value unlock 2.64 B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 24: Major assets disposed
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
SREI
Dispose to RMB 2.07bn Of which: - RMB 0.4bn (20%) has been paid - RMB 0.6bn has been deducted
from asset disposal agreement on Wuxi project group
Outstanding balance: ~RMB 1bn
Disposal Master Agreement
Net assets value: RMB 2.1bn Disposal value: RMB 2.07bn, Of which:
Consideration was RMB 1bn Loans repayable was RMB 1.07bn
Shanghai Luodian ancillary facilities operation business, such as hotel, hospital, golf course
Chengdu project
Wuxi project (Changed to dispose to Wuxi government)
Disposal of Wuxi projects group
Net assets value: RMB 0.46bn Disposal value: RMB 1.1bn, Net gain from disposal is RMB 0.6bn
Wuxi Gov’t
Dispose to
RMB 1.1bn Outstanding balance: ~RMB 0.5bn
Wuxi Hongshan Development
CNTD
30% of Changchun New Town
Automotive Development Zone Committee
Disposal of 30% stake on Changchun New Town
Net assets value: RMB 6.45mn Disposal value: RMB 66.28mn Net gain from disposal is RMB 53.84mn Outstanding balance: ~RMB 66mn
Dispose to
+
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 12
CMI taking control on SREG, installment expected to resume
Shi Jian, former Chairman of CNTD and SREG, has been requested by Changzhou
government to stay under custody at designated residence in June 2015. After that, Poly
Real Estate (600048 CH) expressed an interest to take control on SREG by share
subscription in the same month, but the deal was called off in Aug 2015. Nevertheless,
China Minsheng Jiaye (CMJI), which is the real estate arm of China Minsheng Investment
(CMI) signed a MOU with SREI for subscription of share in SREG such that CMJI will
become the largest shareholder with controlling position in Sept 2015. The transaction
was completed in Dec 2015.
CMI taking control on SREG, postponed assets disposal expected to resume
According to management, SREG is the guarantor on payment of the disposal
consideration of SREI. SREG Subscription successfully issued and placed 14.9bn of share
in Dec 2015, and CMJI became major shareholder of SREG with controlling stake of
60.78%. The strong background of CMI is expected to provide financial aid to SREI for
completing the assets disposal. According to Cheng Donghui, CEO of CMJI, CMI will
consider injecting assets into SRE Group for strengthening assets and capital structure of
SREG. It is positive for enhancing stability and sustainability of SREG’s business, and
hence capability on paying the outstanding installment to CNTD. We believe the
postponed asset disposal payment to resume in Mid-2016.
Figure 25: Time line for major events
Source: Companies data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Apr 2014
SREI timely paid the first installment of disposal consideration in Q2 2014
Jun 2015
Shi Jian, former Chairman of CNTD and SREG, has been requested to stay under custody at designated residence MOU signed for share subscription by Poly Real Estate (600048 CH) on SREG
Sept 2015
MOU signed for share subscription by CMI on SREG
Aug 2015
Call off of share subscription by Poly Real Estate (600048 CH) on SREG
Mar 2013
MOU signed for share subscription by CDBC on CNTD
Oct 2013
Detail of Share Subscription plan and Disposal Master Agreement announced
Mar 2014
Completion of share subscription by CDBC. CDBC becomes largest shareholder with controlling stake of 54.32%.
Jun 2014
Cooperation framework agreement on Yuhaitai re-development project signed. This is the first project intake after CDBC taking control
Sept 2014
Delay on payment of second installment of disposal consideration, which scheduled to be paid by Sept 2014
Dec 2014
Disposal of Wuxi project group
Sept 2015
Suspension of Mr. Shi's duties on CNTD
Dec 2015
Completion of share subscription by CMI. CMI becomes largest shareholder of SREG with controlling stake of 60.78%
CNTD related event
SREG related event
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 13
Yuhaitai re-development project, a new business model
Yuhuatai project is the first project intake after CDB took control on CNTD. The project is
located in the Two Bridge (Tiexin Bridge and Xishan Bridge) region of Nanjing. The urban
re-development project (Two Bridge Project) was introduced for accommodating
urbanization of Nanjing.
New business model: Fixed and guaranteed return
For re-developing Two Bridge area of Yuhuatai District, CDB Yuhua has been established
for primary land development including demolition of existing houses and building.
Before introduction of CNTD, CDB Yuhua has registered capital of RMB 510mn owned by
Software Valley Tourism and Software Valley Asset, which are subsidiary of Yuhuatai
District State-Owned Asset Operations (SOAO) and Yuhuatai District Government,
respectively. CNTD has contributed additional capital of RMB 490mn to CDB Yuhua in
2014, such that registered capital of CDB Yuhua increased to RMB 1,000mn and CNTD
has 49% stake of interest on the project company.
CDB Yuhua is the sole authorized primary land developer of Two Bridges Project, and has
priority to participate in development of other primary land projects within the planning
area of the Yuhuatai District. Yuhuatai District Government has agreed that Yuhuatai
SOAO shall guarantee 17.1% pre-tax fixed investment income on capital contribution to
CDB Yuhua. After-tax fixed return is estimated of 12.8%. CDB Yuhua shall pay dividends to
its shareholders, including CNTD, each year as practicable. If such dividends do not satisfy
the fixed return requirement, Yuhuatai District Government and Yuhuatai SOAO shall
ensure to pay to CNTD for satisfying such requirement. Upon termination, Yuhuatai
District Government and Yuhuatai SOAO will buy back share of CDB Yuhua from CNTD an
amount equal to capital contribution plus accrued fixed income.
Figure 26: Key summary of Yuhuatai project A
Project company: CDB Yuhua
Total investment size (RMBmn) 1,000 Investment amount by CNTD (RMBmn)
490
Shareholding structure (%)
CNTD 49.00 Software Valley Tourism 41.00 Software Valley Asset 10.00
Return guarantor:
Yuhuatai District Government Yuhuatai District State-Owned Asset
Operations
Pre-tax return on the project (%) 17.10 After-tax return (%) 12.80 Site area (sq.km) 21.40 Investment horizon (year) 5
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 27: New business model of CNTD (taking Yuhautai project as example)
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Share buyback from CDC Yuhua upon expiry of the term of agreement
CNTD
Governments/authorities
CDB Yuhua
49%
RMB 490mn
51%
RMB 510mn
Primary land development services, including land clearing
Services charges payment
Subsidy, covering in financial budgeting
Two Bridges Project
(600)
(400)
(200)
-
200
400
600
800
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
(RMBmn)Cash flow for CNTD
Service providing stage
Initial investment stage
Project exiting stage
Initial investment stage: CNTD contributes capital of RMB 490mn for taking minority position in CDB Yuhua
Service providing stage: JV-company will provide primary land development services to re-development project for fixed service charges. The re-development project will receive subsidy from local government, which is covered by financial budget such that profit distribution can be guaranteed. CNTD will receive RMB 84mn of distribution from CDB Yuhua per annual for 5 years
Project exiting stage: CDB Yuhua will repurchase the equity interest of CNTD upon expiry of agreement
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 14
Yuhaitai, big project taking time to negotiate
Yuhuatai project is a mega-sized project for CNTD, of which capital contribution from the
Company is RMB 490mn. It is the largest investment project in terms of capital
contribution amount since CDBC has taken control on CNTD. Going forwards, we
anticipate a longer approval process for mega re-development project under weakening
economy. It may slow the project flow for CNTD in short term.
Figure 28: Site visit photos on Yuhaitai A
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 30: Location of Yuhuatai project A
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 29: Key milestone of Yuhautai project A
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Jun 2014 – Framework Agreement formed CNTD entered into the Cooperation Framework Agreement on with Nanjing Yuhuatai District government and CDBC. The key terms of investment project, such as capital contribution amount from CNTD, return on investment, investment horizon, are preliminarily mentioned.
Aug 2014 – Further discussion on commercial terms CNTD voluntarily made announcement on progress of Yuhaitai project. CNTD has further discussed with Yuhaitai District government on detailed commercial terms of the project. The Company has achieved solid progress.
Nov 2014 – Entered into agreement and contributed capital CNTD announced that it has entered into Cooperative Investment Agreement with Yuhuatai District Government and other related parties. The detailed terms of the project are confirmed, and capital has been contributed by CNTD to the project. Major key terms: Capital contribution from CNTD: RMB 490mn Stake owned by CNTD: 49% After-tax fixed return: 12.8% Exit arrangement: The project company repurchases CNTD’s equity interest in CDB Yuhua.
1H15 – Investment income received from Yuhuatai Project Investment income started contributing profit for CNTD in 1H15. Of which RMB 7.77mn has been received. The shorts from cash received and investment income were booked as investment return receivables.
Jan 2014 – Start discussion CDBC Start negotiating with local government
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 15
Potential upside: option for secondary development in Yuhaitai
Yuhuatai District Government promised to coordinate land sales process in Two Bridge
area in order to help CNTD to acquire land for secondary development. We believe it is
able to create upside potential on the project on top of the fixed and guaranteed return
from primary land development investment.
Stepping into secondary property development
Yuhuatai District Government promised to arrange 400,000sqm (or 600mu) of land for
CNTD to acquire in 2016-21. We believe CNTD to co-develop secondary development
with other property developers. Under the arrangement, CNTD not only can get the land
for secondary development at a relatively low price, but also has a better strategic
investment planning leveraging on its understanding on the overall development plan of
Two Bridges area from involvement of primary land development.
The first secondary property development project induced from Yuhuatai project
CNTD has entered a strategic cooperation framework agreement with Shenzhen Venture
Capital Group (SVCG) in Sept 2015. The Company will acquire 13.9% of share capital of
Jiangsu Hong-tu Software Venture Capital Investment (Hong-Ruan Investment) from
SVCG with a consideration of RMB 37.5mn. Through Hong-Ruan Investment, CNTD can
indirectly participate into development of A5 land parcel in Nanjing Yuhuatai Software
Valley. The A5 land parcel has a site area of 34,296 sqm with planned GFA of 179,626
sqm. The land is situated in prime location of Nanjing Yuhuatai Software Valley, adjacent
to Nanjing high speed railway station. It will be primarily developed for office building
use.
Property market recovery in Yuhautai District
We see property sales situation of Yuhuatai District is recovering during 2H15, and we
are positive on long term growth of the district. The Two Bridges Project is located in
Yuhuatai District of Nanjing. It is at center of Nanjing Software Valley, which is China’s
largest communication software industrial park which achieved annual software and
information technology services revenue increased from RMB 52bn in 2011 to RMB
200bn in 2015. There are 110,000 software personnel working and living in the district of
Software Valley. According to urban development plan, it is targeted to grow the
software valley such that number of personnel enlarges to over 800,000 by 2020. We
believe it will support demand for residential property in the district in future.
Figure 31: Unit sales of residential in Yuhaitai Figure 32: Property transaction in Nanjing A
B
A
B
Source: Nanjing Housing Authority, Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Source: NBS of Nanjing, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 16
Further plans: industry value chain and township management
Urbanization includes not only property development, but also introduction of 1)
industry value chain for improvement of economic growth and employment; and 2)
township management for improvement of living environment.
Industry value chain, an added value of CNTD for local government
The Company has entered a strategic cooperation framework agreement with National
Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund (National IC Fund), which is initiated by CBDC,
in May 2015. According to the agreement, National IC Fund will introduce local
government partners and major players in IC industry to CNTD, as well as preferentially
procure construction and re-development services from CNTD for IC industrial park
development. Furthermore, in Dec 2015, CNTD established CDB Agriculture for investing
in Chengdu Agriculture which is a JV company of CDBC and Chengdu government. CNTD
is able to learn from experiences on farmland relocation and agricultural development of
Chengdu Agriculture. We believe it is benefit for CNTD from improving chance of winning
re-development projects with explicit conditions on concurrent restoration of farmland.
Thanks to background of CDBC, CNTD can seek cooperation with operation arms, such as
National IC Fund and Chengdu Agriculture, on industry development project of CDBC. It
can increase chance of success on the urban development projects, and hence bring
added value to local governments.
Township management, a recurring income for CNTD
CNTD plans to help district governments to develop township management system for
ancillary facilities (such as school, hospital, distributed power, solid wastage management)
via establishing JV companies with facilities operators and local government. With strong
understanding on district urban development from participating in primary (as well as
secondary) development and accessibility of land resources, we believe CNTD can work
as a good coordinator between facilities operators and governments. Although township
management services businesses will not bring significant income in short-to-medium
term, we believe it will help CNTD to develop a source of stable and recurring income in
long term.
Helping governments to develop industry
Figure 34: Examples of ancillary facilities operation for township management
Source: Companies data, Orient Securities (HK)
Education provision Maple Leaf (1317 HK) - International school operator in China. It forms PPP partnership with local governments. Governments are responsible for school construction, while the company is responsible for offering education services.
Solid waste treatment China Everbright Int’l (257 HK)/Canvest Env’t (1381 HK) – Waste-to-energy (WTE) providers operating WTE plants under BOT/BOO model. Local governments provide solid waste to the companies, and the companies will charge waste processing fee and receive on-grid power tariff from WTE process.
Smart grid Boer Power (1685 HK)/Wasion Group (3393 HK) – Waison mainly provides smart meter for real time measurement, and Boer provides integrated electrical distribution system and solution. It can improve communication between the utility and its customers, which lead better integration of customer-owner power generation systems
Healthcare Phoenix Healthcare (1515 HK) – Operator of private hospital under IOT model. It provides a full spectrum of general healthcare services. The company participates in PPP project with government-owned hospital, via which hospital management services are outsourced to Phoenix Healthcare.
Figure 33: Corporate structure of CDBC
Source: CDBC, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
National Integrated Circuit Fund
China-Africa Development Fund
Equipment Manufacturing Investment Fund
CDB Kai Yuan Private Equity FOF
CDB Urbanization Development Fund
CDB Urban Transportation Investment Development Fund
CDB International Holding Co. Ltd (CDBIH)
CDB Innovation Capital Co. Ltd
CDB Assets Management Co. Ltd
CDB New Energy Technology Co. Ltd
CDB Development Fund
CDBC CNTD
(1278 HK)
CDB Int'l Investment (1062 HK)
Cooperation framework
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 17
Magnifying return using secondary leverage
CNTD establishes an Umbrella Trust for secondary leverage to invest in projects. It can
help the Company to enhance project return. Technically speaking, an Umbrella Trust is a
trust plan designed to provide high leverage for trust investor. Thanks to strong
connection with China Development Bank, CNTD can partner with financial institutes to
establish Umbrella Trust. The Company announced to set up an Umbrella Trust with Bank
of Communication (BOCOM) in June 2015. We believe more Umbrella Trusts will be
established in future.
CDB (Beijing) – BOCOM New-Type Urbanization Development Fund
The Company has entered into an agreement with Bank of Communications (BOCOM)
Schroder Fund, CDB Development Fund, CDB Capital and CDB Investment-Development
Fund Management (Beijing), for setting up of an investment partnership, named CDB
(Beijing) – BOCOM New-Type Urbanization Development Fund (CDB-BOCOM Fund) (国开
(北京)– 交行新型城镇化发展基金). Total investment amount of CDB-BOCOM Fund is
RMB 10bn, of which capital contribution of CNTD is RMB 150mn. The fund primarily
focuses on old town reformation, shanty town reformation, primary land development
and integrated land and property development project.
General partner of CDB-BOCOM Fund is CDB Investment-Development Fund
Management (Beijing) Co. Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBDC, while limited partners
of the fund are categorized in three types: senior-tranche, mid-tranche and Junior-
tranche. CNTD is one of limited partner in Junior-tranche. In accordance with agreement,
senior- and mid-tranche limited partners are entitled a guaranteed but ceilinged return
rate. For junior-tranche limited partners and general partner, they are not entitled to
preferential investment gains but enjoy profit sharing of the Fund.
CNTD seeks debt financing for leveraging up return on shareholder equity. This is primary
leverage which is on listing company level. When CNTD invests project via the Fund, it is
equivalent to use investment capital from senior- and mid-tranche partners as secondary
leverage. Investment return after secondary leverage can be over 50% p.a.
Figure 35: Partnership of CDB-BOCOM Fund A
Partnership Return Arrangement
Capital Paid
(RMBbn) Senior Tranche: - BOCOM
Schroder Fund
PBOC rate (5yr loan) + 1.6ppt
8.00
Mid Tranche: - CDB
Development Fund
Fixed rate at 12% 0.80
Junior Tranche: - CNTD - CDBC
Profit sharing after Senior and Mid tranche investor
1.20
Total 10.00
B Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 36: Structure of CDB (Beijing) – BOCOMM New - Type Urbanization Development Fund
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Capital contribution:
Total fund size: RMB 1.2bn
CNTD: RMB 150mn
CBDC: RMB 1,050mn
Junior-Tranche (12% of stake)
Total fund size: RMB 2bn
Leverage: 1.67x
Mid-tranche (8% of stake)
CDB Development Fund: RMB 800mn
Total fund size: RMB 10bn
Leverage: 8.33x
Senior-tranche (80% of stake)
BOCOM Schroder Fund: RMB 8,000mn
Investment: RMB 500mn
Return: RMB 60mn
Attributable to Senior-tranche RMB 400mn X 7.25% = RMB 29m
To Senior-tranche: RMB 29mn
To Mid-tranche: RMB 4.8mn
Attributable to Mid-tranche RMB 40mn X 12% = RMB 4.8m
The rest for junior-tranche Total return: RMB 60mn Less: Attr Senior: RMB 29mn Less: Attr Mid: RMB 4.8mn
Net profit: RMB 26.2mn
Shanty-town Reformation Project Assume: The Fund invests RMB 500mn capital on the project with fixed return of 12% for one year
Capital contribution for Junior RMB 500mn X 12% = RMB 60mn Net return for Junior RMB 26.2mn Rate on return: RMB 26.2mn/RMB 60mn = 43.7%
Case study:
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 18
Strong new project flow: new management with good execution
Upon completion of share placing to CDB, the Company had been undergoing internal
restructuring lasting for one year. In late 2014, Yuhuatai development project, the first
project introduced by CDB entered to CNTD. After that, we see new project flow to the
Company is strong and sustainable. It reflects good execution and project sourcing
capability of new management.
High project return thanks to secondary leverage
As of Dec 31, 2015, there are 18 new projects newly signed by CNTD since introduction
of CDB as controlling shareholder of the Company. Of which 13 are invested via
CDB-BOCOM Fund, and five are directly invested by CNTD. Total investment size
amounted to RMB 1.4bn, and RMB 65.2mn of capital are invested via CDB-BOCOM Fund.
Average return for the 18 projects is 32.6% p.a., thanks to the 13 projects invested under
CDB-BOCOM Fund which return have been geared-up.
Figure 37: Key project flow of CNTD after CDBC taking control A
Investment Project Investment Horizon Pre-tax Guaranteed investment income Date Size Return FY15E FY16E FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E (RMBmn) (Year) (%) (RMBmn)
2014-Jun Nanjing CDB Yuhua Slum Area Transformation and Re-development
490.0 5.0 17.10
83.8 83.8 83.8 83.8 69.8
2015-Jul Danyang Tiansheng PPP Project 200.0 2.0 13.00
13.0 26.0 13.0
2015-Jul CDB-BOCOM Fund - Luzhou Shanty-town Reformation Project
4.5 4.0 52.00
1.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 1.2
2015-Aug CDB-BOCOM Fund - Hunan Shaoyang City Affordable Housing Development
3.0 5.0 32.00
0.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.6
2015-Aug CDB-BOCOM Fund - Hunan Yueyang Shanty-town Reformation Investment
3.7 5.0 32.00
0.5 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.7
2015-Nov CDB-BOCOM Fund - Dachang Project 7.5 2.0 48.70
0.6 3.7 3.0
2015-Nov CDB-BOCOM Fund - Sanya Shanty-Town Reformation Project (Phase 1)
4.5 3.0 32.00
0.2 1.4 1.4 1.2
2015-Nov CDB-BOCOM Fund - Beijing Enterprises’ Project
2.3 1.5 61.20
0.2 1.4 0.5
2015-Nov Yangzhou Airport New Town Project 300.0 3.0 13.00
- 13.0 13.0 13.0
2015-Dec CDB-BOCOM Fund - Luzhou Shanty-town Reformation Project (2nd round)
4.5 2.0 52.00
- 2.3 2.3
2015-Dec CDB-BOCOM Fund - Jinjiang Shanty-Town Reformation Project
7.5 2.8 40.00
- 3.0 3.0 2.5
2015-Dec CDB-BOCOM Fund - Shaoyang Shanty-Town Reformation Project
2.3 5.0 32.00
- 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
2015-Dec Danyang Xinmeng River Project 200.0 1.0 12.00
- 24.0
2015-Dec Zhengzhou Heizhuzhuang Urban Village Reconstruction Project
180.0 1.0 12.00
- 21.6
2015-Dec CDB-BOCOM Fund - Jin County New Town Project
7.5 5.0 40.30
- 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
2015-Dec CDB-BOCOM Fund - Sanya Shanty-Town Reformation Project (Phase 2)
6.0 3.0 32.00
- 1.9 1.9 1.9
2015-Dec CDB-BOCOM Fund - Taizhou Huaxin Infrastructure Project
7.5 3.0 32.80
- 2.5 2.5 2.5
2015-Dec CDB-BOCOM Fund - Huasheng Affordable Housing Project (Phase 1)
4.5 1.0 32.00
- 2.4
Total investment size (RMBmn) 1,435.2 Guaranteed investment income (RMBmn) 99.9 195.4 132.9 113.3 77.1 5.2
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 19
Liability-driven balance sheet expansion to drive investment
Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
Non-SOE primary land developer New Era: SOE urbanization project investor
Share
price
Earnings
Assets
Debt/
Equity
(1,000)
(800)
(600)
(400)
(200)
-
200
400
600
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
(RMBmn)(RMBmn)Revenue (LHS) Net income (RHS)
-
3,000
6,000
9,000
12,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
(RMBmn) Investment Inventory and others Disposal Assets
-
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
(HK$)
-
3,000
6,000
9,000
12,000
2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
(RMBmn) Total Equity Loan
Umbrella trust loan Disposal Liab
Positive event
Negative event
2013-Mar: MOU s igned for share subscription
by CDBC on CNTD
2010-Oct: CNTD s tarted
l i sting in HK. Share price melted by weak P&L
performance
2013-Oct: CDBC
Subscription Agreement and Disposal Master
Agreement signed
2014-Mar: Share placing to CDBC
completed
2015-Sep: Suspension of Mr Shi duties
2014-Dec: Disposal agreement for Wuxi
project group signed
2015-Jun: CNTD announced Shi Jian, former Chairman, has been requested to stay under custody at
des ignated residence
2014-Jun: Cooperation
framework agreement of Yuhuatai project
group s igned
Earnings were volatile before CDBC taking control. It is because of instability of land sales. Land sales amount could be small or even nil
Thanks to background of China Development Bank, CNTD is able to seek low cost debt and umbrella trust loan to finance project investment
Proceeds from assets disposal will become capital for project investment
In our view: After CDBC taking control, CNTD is transforming from primary land project execution player to urbanization project investor. Earnings driver changes from land sales with low visibility to investment income with fixed and guaranteed return. We believe it will be a re-rating catalyst for CNTD with earnings size increment from investment income.
Using debt to support growth on investment assets size
The larger the investment size, the higher the income
Improvement on earnings visibility will be re-rating catalyst for CNTD
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 20
Existing projects: taking time to digest land inventory
No sales is expected for FY15E
As most of ancillary facilities operation businesses were disposed form the master
disposal agreements and disposal agreement with Wuxi government, the corresponding
operation revenue had no longer contributed P&L of CNTD since 2013. According to
management, no land parcel was sold in 2015. Therefore we expect revenue and gross
profit from land development to be zero in FY15E.
More sales from Shanghai
Going forward, by considering with supportive policies, such as lowering of down
payment requirement for property mortgage and monetary loosening measures in China,
we expect recovery of China property sector, especially in higher tier cities, to continue in
2016. After discussing with management, we believe CNTD will put more focus on
Luodian project due to better property market sentiment in Shanghai comparing with
that in Shenyang.
Expect to take eight to ten years to digest inventory
We expect CNTD to take eight to ten years to digest the inventory of Luodian project. We
assume ~60,000sqm of land parcels will be sold per year in FY16-25. The latest selling
price of land parcel in Luodian was RMB 8,850psm. We assume selling price of the land
parcel to grow by 3% p.a. By considering with profit share ratio of 48% for CNTD, we
estimate revenue from Luodian project to be ~RMB 260mn p.a. in FY16-17E. For Lixiang
project, we expect no land sales will be made in short term future because of lukewarm
property market in Shenyang and low completion rate of Lixiang project at ~45% as of
end 2015 (vs. ~96% for Luodian project).
Figure 38: Revenue projection on CNTD A
B
Note*: Gross profit in FY14 is adjusted by adding back Impairment loss Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Most of ancillary facilities operation businesses and Wuxi project have been disposed.
The gross profit dropped mainly due to downward adjustment on proceeds sharing ratio with Shanghai Gov’t. The sharing ratio for CNTD dropped from 64% before FY10 to 57% in FY11, and further down to 48% in FY13 and thereafter.
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 21
New investment: fast growth on investment project
Investment income from urban development project: bread and butter
CNTD changed its business model from primary land developer to urban development
project investor. Looking forward, we believe investment income from the urban
development projects will become major source of income to CNTD.
As of end 2015, the Company has invested in 18 projects with capital investment size of
RMB 1.4bn. Investment horizons on the 18 projects are ranging from one to five years,
and the investment-size weighted average is 3 years. Based on guaranteed return
specifying on project agreements signed between CNTD and project owners (which are
mainly local governments), we estimate that overall secured investment income will be
doubled from RMB 100mn in FY15E to RMB 195mn in FY16E.
According to management, CNTD targets to sign two to three projects with total
investment size of RMB 300-400mn each p.a. in coming three years. Considering with its
close connection with China Development Bank which has a large urban development
project pool, we believe it is achievable.
Hiking financial cost with gearing but manageable
Because of disposal of primary land development and ancillary facilities operation
businesses, debt will also be disposed from the Company. Total debt size was trimmed
and net gearing dropped to 2.6% by end 2014. However, for the sake of supporting
project investment, CNTD has issued RMB 1.3bn of three year Senior Guaranteed Notes
at 5.5% in April 2015. We estimate net gearing of CNTD to resurge in 2H15. For gearing
up investable capital, CNTD established an umbrella trust with CDB and BOCOM. Return
on equity for CNTD will be leveraged up by the trust loan structure. After discussing with
management, we believe the Company will seek more trust loans going forward to
enhance project return. The corresponding liabilities from trust loan structure will be
off-balance sheet. By adding back the trust loan size, we estimate CNTD’s adjusted net
gearing will hike to 122% by FY20. Nevertheless, the interest cost induced by trust loan
has to pay only if CNTD consumes it on project investment. Therefore such financial
leverage will not be subject to overfunding risk.
Figure 39: Invested capital and return Figure 40: Total debt and adjusted net gearing A
B
A
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Earnings grow with investment assets size, which will be supported by low cost debt financing
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 22
Sustainable growth expected after 2015 turnaround finally
Net loss expected to turnaround in FY15, and regain momentum
The net income of CNTD was volatile before FY15E due to low visibility of primary land
development business. After assets disposals on unprofitable primary land development
and ancillary facilities operation businesses, we expect CNTD will turnaround in FY15E
from loss making in FY13-14. Going forward, project investment income will be key
growth driver for CNTD. We expect earnings to grow fast in FY16-20E with investment
assets size. We estimate net income to rocket at 50.4% of CAGR during the period. After
the blooming stage, we expect the Company to maintain stable new project intake
momentum with additional investment size of RMB 350mn per year during stable growth
stage in FY21-25E. Furthermore, we believe that CNTD is able to re-invest proceeds from
exited projects under comparable rate on return during this stage. We estimate net
income to grow at 5.8% of CAGR during stable growth stage. After the stable growth
stage, we expect total investment assets size to be saturated and maintain low single
digit growth p.a. during the maturity stage.
More upside on earnings growth
Urban development project investment provides guaranteed and fixed return for CNTD,
while CNTD is seeking opportunity for pushing its boundary to secondary property
development and township services management induced from the urban development
project. However, due to high uncertainty on further development, the income growth
has yet to include in our earnings projection. It will be an extra upside potential for CNTD
in our view.
Dividend policy
No dividend has been paid out since 2011 due to high CAPEX requirement for primary
land development. Going forward, we expect CNTD to re-consider dividend payout due
to a higher cash flow predictability under new business model. In our view, thanks to
availability of low cost funding, profit distribution will not be a heavy pressure on
liquidity for CNTD. We expect CNTD to start distribute dividend to common shareholder
in FY17E with payout ratio of 100%. We also believe that dividend payout policy can
improve investment sentiment on CNTD in the counter. It will be a re-rating catalyst for
CNTD.
Figure 41: Net income and investment income A
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Earnings performance is volatile before FY15E. We expect net loss will be turnaround in FY15E.
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 23
Initiate with BUY: stable and foreseeable future cash flow
We have applied Discount Cash Flow (DCF) model on CNTD’s free cash flow of equity. We
estimate total investment assets size to fast in FY16-20E. After that, we expect growth on
investment assets size to slow gradually and maintain moderate growth at 1% beyond
2030. Due to change of business model, we consider assets management companies
(AMC) are the closet peers for CNTD, rather than urban development player and primary
land developer. The average beta for AMC listing in HK is 0.9x. By considering with
smaller in market capital size of CNTD, we apply 1.2x for CNTD’s beta estimation. Under
these circumstances, we estimate cost of equity for CNTD is 10.54%. Our estimated fair
value on equity, based on DCF model, for CNTD is HK$ 4,083mn, or HK$ 0.415 per share.
Trading below book with good assets quality plus upside potential, Initiate with BUY
CNTD is trading at 0.6x FY15E P/B in the counter. Book value of CNTD amounted to RMB
3,521mn (as of Q3 2015). By deducting inventory value (which is mainly referring to
primary land development project of the Company) from equity, we estimate the
adjusted book value for CNTD is RMB 1,965mn. The adjusted book value is reflecting
assets value of receivable from assets disposal, investment assets and cash on hand. We
believe the discount value for these three major assets is small because: 1) upon the
completion of share placing of SREG to CMI, settlement of assets disposal will be more
promising; 2) investment assets has a fixed and guaranteed return supported by CDB and
local governments. The adjusted book value translates into HK$ 0.236/share, which is
equal to 94% of current trading price. Therefore we believe current is not demanding.
Our target price for CNTD is HK$ 0.33, which is equal to 20% discount to our estimated
fair value based on DCF. We believe the discount rate is justified after considering with
project intake risk in future. Going forward, opportunity on stepping into secondary
development and township management sector provide upside potential to the
Company. We initiate BUY for CNTD.
Figure 43: Key assumption and summary on DCF model (Base case) A
Key Assumption FY14 FY15E FY16E FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E FY21E FY22E FY23E FY24E FY25E (RMBmn) Investment size 490 1,239 1,639 2,534 3,407 3,762 4,112 4,472 4,822 5,172 5,522 5,872
Growth (% YoY) 152.84 32.30 54.57 34.47 10.43 9.30 8.76 7.83 7.26 6.77 6.34 Total debt 896 1,924 2,040 2,240 2,340 2,840 3,240 3,440 3,640 3,840 4,040 4,240
Net gearing (%) 2.61 34.33 16.28 2.95 4.68 13.04 20.64 27.47 34.58 41.40 47.92 54.17 Net income (61) 35 129 196 271 297 331 355 377 398 420 442
Growth (% YoY) - 269.21 52.56 38.01 9.74 11.56 7.28 6.00 5.71 5.49 5.29 EBIT (14) 107 287 384 483 546 613 655 694 733 772 812
Less: Tax expenses (45) 0 35 52 71 77 86 92 97 102 108 113 Less: Interest expenses 86 70 112 124 130 160 184 196 208 220 232 244 Add: D&A 26 5 9 14 18 21 24 27 29 32 34 36 Add: Change in working capital 208 62 553 712 397 97 97 99 99 100 100 100 Add: Net debt financing (46) 40 116 200 100 500 400 200 200 200 200 200 Less: CAPEX & Investment (19) 214 21 371 494 408 403 413 403 403 403 403
FCF to Equity (349) (71) 797 762 303 519 461 280 314 338 362 387 FX rate (RMB-> HK$) 1.18 1.12 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 FCF to Equity (HK$mn) (84) 896 816 324 555 493 300 336 362 388 414 Discounted FCFE (HK$mn) (84) 811 668 240 372 299 164 167 162 157 152 Terminal growth (%) 1.0 Cost of equity (%) 10.5 Est fair value to Equity (HK$mn) 4,083 Fair value per share (HK$) 0.415
B
Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 42: Cost of equity estimation A
Parameter Estimation (%) Market return 9.28 Beta (X) 1.2 Risk free rate 3.00
Cost of equity 10.54 B
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 44: Sensitivity analysis on fair value based on DCF (HK$/share)
A
Avg return
Growth of investment assets CAGR 2016-20E (%)
(%) 11.12 19.12 27.12 35.12 43.12 9.82 0.197 0.272 0.363 0.470 0.597 12.82 0.216 0.295 0.389 0.500 0.631 15.82 0.236 0.318 0.415 0.530 0.665 18.82 0.256 0.341 0.441 0.559 0.699 21.82 0.276 0.364 0.467 0.589 0.733
B
Source: Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 24
Valuation: an investment company more than property
A bargain choice for middle to long term investment horizon
Although CNTD is trading at 15x FY16E P/E, which is premium to peers’, considering with
fast growth opportunity, we believe the premium is justified. FY15-17E PEG ratio for
CNTD is 0.4x, which is similar to mean of peers’. The Company is trading at 0.6x FY15E
P/B, which is lower than mean of peers’. By considering with the high quality of its
investment assets and high visibility on investment return, we believe CNTD is a bargain
choice for investor with middle to long term horizon.
Figure 45: P/B Band Figure 46: Historical P/B
A
B
A
B
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Source: Company data, Bloomberg, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Figure 47: Peer valuation table A
Ticker Company Trade Share MktCap P/E (x) EPS CAGR PEG (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/B (x) Div. yield (%) Currency Price (HK$mn) FY14 FY15E FY16E 15-17E 15-17E FY14 FY15E FY16E FY14 FY15E FY16E FY14 FY15E FY16E 1278 HK The Company HKD 0.25 2,462 - 59.4 14.8 144.2 0.4 169.9 18.9 7.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 - - -
Assets management company
2799 HK CHINA HUARONG HKD 2.51 98,066 5.5 5.0 4.5 15.1 0.3 8.8 14.2 11.7 1.0 0.8 0.7 - 3.1 5.2
1359 HK CHINA CINDA HKD 2.24 81,215 5.7 4.5 3.9 16.4 0.3 11.4 11.8 9.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 5.2 6.3 7.2
53 HK GUOCO GROUP HKD 76.20 25,074 5.3 5.8 6.4 - - 10.8 - - 0.4 - - 5.3 4.6 5.3
806 HK VALUE PARTNERS HKD 6.02 11,129 13.3 18.6 13.1 32.5 0.6 10.1 15.8 12.3 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.7 2.5 3.4
Average
7.5 8.5 7.0 21.3 0.4 10.3 14.0 11.3 1.2 1.4 1.3 4.4 4.1 5.3
Urbanization player
1668 HK CHINA SOUTH CITY HKD 1.39 11,119 2.9 6.3 5.0 20.3 0.3 3.5 9.6 8.0 0.5 0.4 0.4 10.1 5.8 7.1
6166 HK CHINA VAST HKD 2.65 4,340 4.5 - - - - 5.9 - - 2.4
5.4 - -
1369 HK WUZHOU INTL HKD 0.82 4,092 12.7 13.8 8.6 49.7 0.3 12.6 10.5 7.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 - - -
1396 HK HYDOO INTL HKD 0.81 3,252 5.4 5.2 4.0 27.3 0.2 3.0 - - 0.6 - - 7.1 - -
798 HK OPTICS VALLEY UNION HKD 0.78 3,120 5.9 4.1 3.3 - - 10.3 - - 1.1 - - 3.9 - -
Average
6.3 7.4 5.2 32.5 0.3 7.0 10.0 7.9 1.1 0.6 0.6 6.6 5.8 7.1
Primary land developer
1800 HK CCCC HKD 6.25 177,751 6.1 5.7 5.1 12.5 0.5 10.7 9.3 8.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 3.3 3.8 4.3
817 HK CHINA JINMAO HKD 1.80 19,209 3.1 5.5 4.9 16.3 0.3 8.2 7.9 6.8 0.5 0.4 0.4 6.4 5.6 6.5
2608 HK SUNSHINE 100 HKD 3.54 8,408 7.3 7.4 5.6 32.0 0.2 21.1 17.0 12.7 1.3 1.3 1.1 - - -
260 HK AVIC JOY HLDG HKD 0.204 1,213 - - - - - 65.8 - - 0.8 - - - - -
Average
5.5 6.2 5.2 20.3 0.3 26.5 11.4 9.3 0.8 0.8 0.7 4.8 4.7 5.4
Total average
6.6 7.5 5.9 24.7 0.3 14.6 11.9 9.6 1.1 1.0 0.9 3.6 4.8 5.8
B
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 25
Risk factor: future project intakes
Growth driver for CNTD in future will be investment income after transformation from
primary land developer to project investors. We consider major risk for CNTD is project
intake momentum. Upon completion of share placing of the Company in 2013, CDBC
took one year for internal restructuring, and started its strong project flow since 2H15.
Nevertheless, project intake in future is subject to approval from local governments and
corresponding urban development authority. It is highly correlated to macro-economic
situation.
Lukewarm economic growth …
The lukewarm economy of China holds back urban development plans and secondary
property development, especially in lower tier cities. Total trade figure fell 8% YoY in
2015. PMI is staying below 50 for six consecutive months since Aug 2015, according to
NBSC. Growth on fixed-assets investment (FAI), a key growth driver of economy, was
slowing to 10% YoY in 2015 from 15.7% YoY in 2014. The weakening production growth
lowers economic value of urban development projects, and hence willingness of project
investment from private sector in short term.
… But supported by CDB project pool
Nevertheless, thanks to strong support from CDB group, the Company still management
to post strong project flow in 2H15. Mr. Fan Haibin (樊海斌) who is CIO of CDB and
president of CDBC and Mr. Zuo Kun (左坤) who is vice president of CDBC were appointed
as Chairman and Vice Chairman of CNTD’s board of directors in Mar 2014. The strong
bonding of CDB group and CNTD is more than parent company and subsidiary. The
support from CDB group on CNTD is undoubted. Within the large project pool of CDB,
there are some matured projects with relatively higher economic value. We believe
addressable market for CNTD is still large enough for sustaining its growth momentum in
mid-to-short term. We consider the project sourcing capability of CNTD is its comparative
advantage toward peers. Poor business environment creates opportunity for the
Company to enlarge its market share. It benefits CNTD to push its boundary forward to
downstream secondary property development and township management markets in
future.
Figure 48: Trade figure of China Figure 49: Fixed-assets investment in China A
B
A
B
Source: GACC, Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Source: NBSC, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 26
Financial statements & forecast
Income Statement (Consolidated) Balance Sheet (Consolidated)
FY-end Dec (RMBmn) FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E FY17E FY-end Dec (RMBmn) FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E FY17E
Revenue 608 57 - 261 269 Current Assets 8,556 9,228 9,391 8,108 6,149 Cost of sales (354) (651) (15) (185) (190) Inventories 7,348 1,549 1,556 1,494 1,432 Gross profits 255 (594) 15 76 78 Trade/bill receivables 743 64 63 66 69 Selling & Dist. cost (73) (9) - (26) (27) Other receivables 22 1,906 1,580 1,106 474 Administrative Expense (70) (82) (75) (82) (88) Cash and equivalent 332 795 1,365 2,056 2,707 Other Income 33 56 113 319 420 Asset disposal - 4,904 4,802 3,361 1,441 Other Expense (19) (1) - - - Other current assets 111 9 24 25 27 Operating profit 126 (630) 53 287 384 Non-current Assets 3,007 585 1,413 1,894 2,878 Finance Expense (115) (86) (70) (112) (124) LT Investments 902 490 1,239 1,639 2,534 Other non-op profit - 616 54 - - Net fixed Assets 1,632 41 87 128 166 Pre-tax profit 11 (100) 37 175 260 Others 474 53 86 126 179 Income tax (credit) (33) 45 8 (35) (52) Total Assets 11,563 9,812 10,803 10,002 9,028
Profit After Tax (22) (55) 45 140 208 Current Liabilities 6,268 5,944 5,333 4,275 2,891 Discontinued operations (237) (150) (15) - - Accounts Payable 2,558 162 154 162 170 Minority 46 144 5 - - ST Borrowings 1,339 896 350 350 350 Net income (213) (61) 35 140 208 Liab.(assets disposal) - 3,472 3,360 2,352 1,008
EBITDA 199 12 111 297 398 Others 2,371 1,414 1,468 1,411 1,364 EBIT 126 (14) 107 287 384 Long-term Liabilities 2,316 21 1,596 1,712 1,914
EPS (RMBcent) (4.7) (0.6) 0.4 1.4 2.1 Long-term Debts 1,798 - 1,574 1,690 1,890 DPS (RMBcent) - - - - 2.1 Others 518 21 22 23 24
Total Liabilities 8,584 5,965 6,928 5,987 4,805
Cash Flow (Consolidated) Minority 522 322 319 319 319
FY-end Dec (RMBmn) FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E FY17E Shareholder equity 2,457 3,526 3,556 3,696 3,903
Profit before income tax (265) (239) 22 175 260 Total equity 2,979 3,847 3,875 4,015 4,223
D&A 73 26 5 9 14 Net debt (cash) 2,805 101 559 (16) (468) Fair value gain/loss 12 (43) (137) (276) (361) Net gearing (%) 94 3 14 Net Cash Net Cash Financial cost 197 162 37 70 65 BPS (RMBcent) 54.6 35.8 36.1 37.5 39.6
Chg in working capital 165 208 62 553 712 Income tax paid (10) 4 (3) (19) (35) Semi-Annual Breakdown (Consolidated)
Others (6) (12) 61 (128) (132) FY-end Dec (RMBmn) 1H13 2H13 1H14 2H14 1H15
Operating Cash Flow 164 104 46 384 522 Revenue 899 (290) 54 3 -
Net CAPEX 6 (28) (53) (53) (53) Gross profit 321 (66) 7 (602) 15 Net investment (13) (507) (152) (400) (895) Operating profit 211 (85) (10) (620) 30 Return from investment - - 80 276 361 Pre-tax profit 103 (92) (63) (37) 10 Advances disposal - 554 (10) 433 577 Net income 31 (244) (104) 43 (9)
Interest received 23 19 33 43 60 Total assets 11,447 11,563 11,938 9,812 10,516 Others - 0 - - 0 Total Equity 3,296 2,979 3,975 3,847 3,835 Investment Cash Flow 16 38 (101) 298 50 Shareholder equity 2,701 2,457 3,483 3,526 3,517
Capital injection - 1,139 - - - Net debt (cash) 2,796 2,805 (426) 101 (445)
Net debt financing (42) (546) 540 116 200 Net gearing (%) 84.83 94.13 Net cash 2.61 Net cash Restricted deposits 10 196 - - - Gross Margin (%) 35.69 - 13.48 - - Dividend paid - - - - - Net Margin (%) 3.41 - (194.3) - -
Interest paid (240) (191) (70) (112) (124) Others - - 74 5 4 Key Ratios
Financing Cash Flow (273) 597 544 8 79 FY-end Dec (RMBmn) FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E FY17E
Net cash change (92) 739 489 690 651 Growth (%) Cash b/n at year-end 332 795 1,365 2,056 2,707 Revenue (90.66) (100.0) - 3.00
EBITDA (93.78) 801.09 166.74 33.91 EBIT - - 169.74 33.55 Key Assumptions Net profit (71.17) (156.7) - 48.25
FY-end Dec (RMBmn) FY13 FY14 FY15E FY16E FY17E Margin (%)
Investment portfolio size - 490 1,239 1,639 2,534 Gross profit 41.87 - - 29.17 29.17 Nanjing Yuhuatai project - 490 490 490 490 EBITDA 32.64 21.74 - 113.84 148.00 Yangzhou Airport Project - - 100 100 100 EBIT 20.69 (24.64) - 110.22 142.91 Danyang Tiansheng PPP - - 200 200 200 Net income (35.02) (108.1) - 53.69 77.28
CBD (BJ) – BOCOM Fund - - 69 87 121 Others (%) Others - - 380 762 1,622 Payout ratio - - - - 100.00
B/S growth (%) Average ROE (2.05) 0.98 3.86 5.46 Investment portfolio - 152.84 32.30 54.57 Average ROA (0.51) 0.43 1.35 2.18 Total Debt (71.44) 114.74 6.00 9.81 Interest coverage (x) 1.73 0.14 1.59 2.64 3.20 Source: Company data, Orient Securities (Hong Kong)
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 27
Appendix I: CDBC’s urban development project pipeline
De
velo
pmen
t of H
axi H
igh-
spee
d R
ailw
ay N
ew
Are
ain
Har
bin
Re
loca
tion
an
d re
nova
tion
of H
adaw
an In
dus
tria
l Pa
rk
Zho
ngx
in In
tern
atio
nal C
ity
in S
hen
bei N
ew D
istr
ict i
n Sh
enya
ngSh
en
yan
g Li
xian
g N
ew
To
wn
De
velo
pmen
t of C
han
gxin
g Is
land
Ind
ustr
ial P
ark
in D
alia
n
Tia
njin
Eco
-cit
y
Lang
fang
Air
port
New
Are
aG
u'a
n In
dust
rial
Ne
w T
ow
n
Shij
iazh
uang
Hea
lth-
city
Guo
kai S
hand
ong
Urb
an D
evel
opm
ent
Fund
Zhen
gzho
u La
nzha
is h
abby
tow
n re
nova
tion
Ping
ding
shan
sha
bby
tow
n re
nova
tion
Na
njin
g Yu
hua
taiN
ew C
ity
De
velo
pm
ent P
roje
ct
Zhe
njia
ng s
habb
y to
wn
reno
vatio
n
Sha
ngh
ai X
uh
ui B
injia
ng M
eng
zhon
gxin
Cu
ltu
ral p
roje
ctSh
an
ghai
Pu
don
g Li
uzao
Dis
ney
New
To
wn
Sha
ngh
ai B
aosh
an L
uod
ian
Ne
w T
ow
n
Guo
kai F
uzho
u U
rban
Dev
elop
men
t Fu
ndJi
njia
ng
Urb
an In
vest
men
t Pro
ject
Jian
gmen
Chi
kan
Tour
ism
Tow
n
Hai
kou
Chan
gyin
g G
loba
l-10
0 Th
eme
Park
Sany
a H
aita
ngw
an C
ultu
ral
Tour
ism
pro
ject
Fen
gtai
Qin
glo
ngh
u In
tern
atio
nal
Cu
ltu
ral a
nd
Con
fere
nce
Tow
n
Bei
jing
Smal
l-to
wn
Fund
-Pin
ggu
Jinh
aihu
-Ya
nq
ing
Hu
ihua
ng In
tern
atio
nal T
our
ism
Res
ort
-Hua
irou
Qia
ozi N
ew T
own
-Hua
irou
Yan
gson
g Fi
lm a
nd T
V b
ase
-Ton
gzho
u In
tern
atio
nal
Hea
lth
Serv
ice
area
Kaiy
uan
Urb
an D
eve
lopm
ent (
Xi’a
n) F
und
-De
velo
pm
ent o
f Xi’
an L
into
ng in
tern
atio
nal t
our
ism
reso
rt-X
i’a
n C
en
tral
Cu
ltur
al B
usin
ess D
istr
ict
Han
zhon
g Zh
ongx
ing
Yuan
Cul
tura
l To
uris
m D
istr
ict
Lanz
hou
Mia
otan
zi s
habb
y to
wn
reno
vati
on p
roje
ct
Gu
oka
i Hu
bei I
nve
stm
ent C
om
pany
-Wu
ha
n D
ongh
uLi
ufan
g N
ew
To
wn
Indu
stri
al P
ark
-Pro
ject
of F
utu
re T
ow
n a
nd B
io-t
own
-Wu
ha
n H
anzh
eng
Stre
et s
habb
y to
wn
reno
vati
on
pro
ject
-Xia
ngy
ang0
8-Ba
se n
ew to
wn
pro
ject
-Yic
ha
ngsh
abby
tow
n re
nova
tio
n p
roje
ct-H
anko
u sh
abby
tow
n re
nova
tion
-Tan
gxun
hu c
omm
unit
y fo
r th
e ag
ed p
eopl
e-W
uhan
Sof
twar
e N
ew T
own
proj
ect
Gu
oka
i Dev
elo
pmen
t Hun
an "
Dou
ble-
typ
e" F
und
-De
velo
pm
ent o
f are
a o
f Ch
angs
ha X
ian
gjia
ng N
ew T
ow
n-D
eve
lop
men
t of u
rban
are
a in
Ch
angs
ha N
ingx
iang
-Zh
uzh
ouR
ail T
rans
port
Eq
uip
men
t In
dust
rial
Bas
e
-De
velo
pm
ent o
f Zh
uzho
u S
hen
nong
and
Xia
ngsh
ui B
ay N
ew
Are
a-D
eve
lop
men
t of a
rea
aro
und
Xia
ngta
n R
ailw
ay S
tati
on-D
eve
lop
men
t of L
iuya
ng T
ow
nshi
p
Gu
oka
i Sih
uan
Lo
ngqu
anyi
Urb
an a
nd R
ural
Dev
elop
men
t Fun
dLu
zhou
sha
bby
tow
n re
nova
tion
Guo
kaiY
unna
n U
rban
Dev
elop
men
t Fu
ndK
unm
ing
shab
by t
own
reno
vati
on
Gu
an
gxi K
aiyu
an In
vest
men
t Co
mpa
ny-B
eih
ai Y
inta
n D
evel
opm
ent a
nd
Inve
stm
ent C
om
pany
-Na
nn
ing
Thre
e-st
reet
-and
-tw
o-al
ley
shab
by
tow
n re
nova
tion
pro
ject
Sha
bby
tow
n re
nova
tion
s in
Wu
xian
g N
ew
Dis
tric
t in
Nan
ing,
Bai
se,
Gu
igan
g, Y
ulin
, Ch
ongz
uo
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 28
Appendix II: CNTD structure
1st Round assets disposal
2nd Round assets disposal
3rd Round assets disposal (From 80% to 50%)
Exsiting assets
New businesses
14.9%
100%
China Development BankInternational Holding
China New Town Development
54.3% 30.8%
Meeko Investment Ltd
(BVI)
100% 100%
Shanghai Golden
Luodian Development Co., Ltd.
SRE Investment Holding Public Shareholders
China Development BankCapital
China Development Bank
100%
Shi Jian
63%
Weblink International
Limited (BVI)
100%
New Town (China)
Trading Co., Ltd. (BVI)
Shanghai Jiatong
Enterprises Co., Ltd
China New Town
Development
(Changchun) Co.,
Ltd. (BVI)
China New Town
Development (Wuxi)
Co., Ltd. (BVI)
China New Town
Development
(Shenyang) Co., Ltd.
(BVI)
Safewell
Investment Limited (BVI)
Wuxi Hongshan New
Town Development Co., Ltd.
Shenyang Lixiang New Town Modern
Agriculture Co., Ltd
Shanghai CNTD
Management Consulting Co., Ltd.
Wuxi Hongshan New
Town Virescence
Environmental
Protection
Construction Co., Ltd
Changchun New Town Automobile Industry
Construct Co., Ltd.Shenyang LakeMalaren Country
Club Limtied
- (100%) Shanghai Lake Malaren
Investment Management Co. Ltd.
- (100%) Shanghai Lake Malaren
Hospital Investment Co., Ltd.
- (100%) Chengdu Shanghai Real
Estate Co., Ltd.
27.37%45.26%
100%
New Town
Procurement Co.,
Ltd. (HK)
Shanghai Hengchang
Trading Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Yuanyi Industrial Co.,
Ltd.
100%
Protex Investment
Limited (BVI)
100%
50%
- (100%) Wuxi Ying Shui Ting Hotel Co., Ltd.
- (60%) Wuxi Xinrui Hospital Management Co., Ltd.
- (100%) Wuxi Hongshan New Town Commercial Operation and
Management Co., Ltd.
Luodian Newco
20%
Shanghai Malaren Lake
Artwork Exhibition Co.,
Ltd.
China New Town Holding Co., Ltd. (HK)
CDB New Town
(Beijing) Management Consulting Co., Ltd.
CDB New Town (Beijing) Asset
Management Co., Ltd
100%
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 29
Appendix III: Profile of key directors and management
Mr. Fan Haibin Non-executive Director and the Chairman of the board of directors
Mr. Fan currently is the chief investment officer of CDB and the president of CDBC, and both CDB and CDBC are controlling shareholders of the Company. Mr. Fan has an extensive experience in the energy investment and financial industry. From 1982 onwards, Mr. Fan worked for the Ministry of Water and Power, State Resources Investment Corporation and CDB. Mr. Fan has become the chief investment officer of CDB and the president of CDBC since November 2013. From 2010 to 2013, Mr. Fan was the Chief Appraisal Officer of CDB. From 1994 to 2010, Mr. Fan had been working at, in chronological order, the Electricity Credit Bureau, First Project Appraisal Bureau, Shijiazhuang Branch, Hebi Branch, and Appraisal Management Bureau of CDB. Before joining CDB, Mr. Fan worked as director of project management division at State Resources Investment Corporation. Mr. Fan is responsible for formulating, developing and reassessing the CNTD’s strategies and policies.
Mr. Zuo Kun Non-executive Director and the Vice Chairman of the board of directors
Mr. Zuo currently is the vice president of CDBC, a controlling shareholder of the Company. Mr. Zuo has an extensive experience in the investment and financial industry. Mr. Zuo joined CDBC in 2009 and has been the vice president of CDBC since March 2011. From 2001 to September 2009, Mr. Zuo had been working at, in chronological order, the International Finance Bureau, Lanzhou Branch, and Executive Office of CDB. Mr. Zuo will be responsible for the duties in absence of the Chairman of the Board and the execution of the CNTD’s business strategies and plans.
Mr. Liu Heqiang Executive Director and the chief executive officer (CEO)
Mr. Liu currently is the general manager of the Direct Investment Division III of CDBC, a controlling shareholder of the Company. Mr. Liu has an extensive experience in the banking and investment industry. Mr. Liu has been appointed as the general manager of Direct Investment Division III of CDBC since December 2009, where he principally engages in investment in urban development related areas. From 1992 to 2009, Mr. Liu had been working at, in chronological order, in State Raw Materials Investment Corporation, and Northeast Credit Department, Tianjian Branch, and the Market and Investment Business Bureau, of CDB. Mr. Liu is the president of the Company and is responsible for the management of the business of CNTD.
Mr. Zhang Yan Non-executive Director
On 28 November 2014, Mr. Zhang was appointed as a Chief Investment Officer of CDBIH. Mr. Zhang has an extensive experience working for leading international investment banks. Prior to joining CDBC in 2009, Mr. Zhang worked at the global special opportunities group of J.P. Morgan, where he engaged in principal investment business. Mr. Zhang had also worked at a PRC investment banking arm of UniCredit Group where he principally advised on cross-border mergers and acquisitions and private placement.
Ms. Yang Meiyu Executive Director
Ms. Yang was the senior manager of the Direct Investment Division III of CDBC, a controlling shareholder of the Company. Prior to the joining CDBC, Ms. Yang worked as an investment manager at China Reits Investment where she worked on various fund raising and land development projects. Ms. Yang has joined CDBC since December 2009 where she principally engages in urban development related investment and she also acts as directors and supervisors of various subsidiaries of CDBC. Ms. Yang is the vice president of the Company and is responsible for, among other things, corporate financing, investment and investors’ relation management.
Mr. Ren Xiaowei Executive Director
On 22 April 2014, Mr. Ren has been promoted from the senior manager to associate general manager of the direct investment division III of CDBC. Mr. Ren joined CDBC since December 2009. Mr. Ren also worked as assistant general manager and chief operating officer of China Development Caofeidian Investment Company Limited, the vice president and chief investment supervisor of China Development Jilin Investment Company Limited. Mr. Ren has extensive experience in import and export industry. Prior to joining CDBC, Mr. Ren worked as department manager of China National Machinery Import & Export Corporation during 1995 to 2003 and as managing director of Bidwiin Tech during 2003 to 2009. Mr. Ren is the vice president of the Company and is responsible for, among other things, the management of urban development projects and construction projects.
Hong Kong Equity | China Property Company in-depth
See last page for disclaimer. 30
Analyst Certification
I, Steve Wong (Cheuk-Wai Wong), being the person primarily responsible for the content of this research report, in whole or in part, hereby certify that:
(1) all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal view about the subject company(ies) and its (or their) securities;
(2) no part of my compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report, or our Investment Banking Department;
(3) I am not, directly or indirectly, supervised by or reporting to our Investment Banking Department;
(4) the subject company(ies) do(es) not fall into the restriction of the quiet period as defined in paragraph 16.5(g) of SFC Code of Conduct;
(5) I and my associates do not deal in or trade in the stock(s) covered in this report within 30 calendar days prior to the date of issue of the report;
(6) I and my associates do not serve as an officer(s) of the listed company(ies) covered in this report; and
(7) I and my associates have no financial interests in relation to the listed company (ies) covered in this report.
Meanings of Orient Securities Ratings
Buy – Describes stocks that we expect to provide a total return of >10% within a 12-month period.
Accumulate – Describes stocks that we expect to provide a total return of >0% within a 12-month period.
Hold – Describes stocks that we expect to provide a total return of between -20% and +20% within a 12-month period.
Sell – Describes stocks that we expect to provide a total return of <0% within a 12-month period.
Disclosure & Disclaimer
Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Limited does and seeks to do business with the company or companies covered in this report. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Limited and its affiliates, officers, directors, and employees may from time to time have long or short positions in securities, warrants, futures, options, derivatives or other financial instruments referred to in this report.
In no event will Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Limited or any other member of Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Limited be liable or responsible for loss of any kind, whether direct, indirect, consequential or incidental, resulting from the act or omission of any third party occurring in reliance upon the contents of this report.
Any information provided in this research report is for information purpose only and have no regards to the investment objectives, financial situation or risk tolerance level of any specific recipient and does not constitute any solicitation or any offer to buy or sell any securities or any other financial instruments. Before entering into any investment contract, individual should exercise judgment or seek for professional advice when necessary. Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Limited may not execute transactions for individual(s) in the securities/instruments mentioned.
Although the information in this report is obtained or complied from sources that Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Limited believes to be reliable, no representation or warranty, either expressed or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the materials contained in this report. All price-related information is indicative only, and value of the investment(s) referred to in this report and the income from them may fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates, market indexes, relevant operational / financial conditions of the company and other factors. Information contained in this report may change at any time and Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Limited gives no undertaking to provide notice of any such change. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur.
This report is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to any law, regulation, rule or other registration or licensing requirement.
Investment(s) in securities / financial instructions put through/execute outside Hong Kong are subject to the applicable laws and regulations of the relevant overseas jurisdiction, the entity issuing this research report and the analyst(s) authoring this research report are not subject to all the disclosures and other regulatory requirements in other countries.
This report may not be copied, reproduced, distributed, redistribute or published by any person for any purpose without the prior written consent of Orient Securities (Hong Kong) Limited. All rights are reserved.