Download - Chapter Five Meaning
Chapter Five Meaning
Semantics is the study of the meaning of linguistic units, words and sentences in particular.
Semantics is relatively young. It remains the least known area in linguistics, compared with phonetics, phonology, morphology and syntax.
1. Meanings of “MEANING”
C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards G. Leech
Geoffrey Leech (1974, 1981). Semantics: The Study of Meaning. Seven types of meaning:
Conceptual meaning Connotative meaning Social meaning Affective meaning Reflected and meaning Collocative meaning Thematic meaning
LINGUISTICS 423/4/20
AssociativeMeaning
3.1 Conceptual meaning
Also called ‘denotative’ or ‘cognitive’ meaning.
Refers to logical, cognitive or denotative content.
Concerned with the relationship between a word and the thing it denotes, or refers to.
LINGUISTICS 523/4/20
3.2 Connotative meaning
The communicative value an expression has by virtue of what it refers to, over and above its purely conceptual content.
A multitude of additional, non-criterial properties, including not only physical characteristics but also psychological and social properties, as well as typical features.
LINGUISTICS 623/4/20
Involving the ‘real world’ experience one associates with an expression when one uses or hears it.
Unstable: they vary considerably according to culture, historical period, and the experience of the individual.
Any characteristic of the referent, identified subjectively or objectively, may contribute to the connotative meaning of the expression which denotes it.
LINGUISTICS 723/4/20
3.3 Social meaning What a piece of language conveys about the
social circumstances of its use. Dialect: the language of a geographical region
or of a social class. Time: the language of the 18th c., etc. Province: language of law, of science, of
advertising, etc. Status: polite, colloquial, slang, etc. Modality: language of memoranda, lectures,
jokes, etc. Singularity: the style of Dickens, etc.
LINGUISTICS 823/4/20
domicile: very formal, official
residence: formal abode: poetic home: general steed: poetic horse: general nag: slang gee-gee: baby language
LINGUISTICS 923/4/20
3.4 Affective meaning
Reflecting the personal feelings of the speaker, including his attitude to the listener, or his attitude to something he is talking about.
You’re a vicious tyrant and a villainous reprobate, and I hate you for it!
I’m terribly sorry to interrupt, but I wonder if you would be so kind as to lower your voices a little. or
Will you belt up.LINGUISTICS 1023/4/20
3.5 Reflected meaning
Arises in cases of multiple conceptual meaning, when one sense of a word forms part of our response to another sense.
When you hear ‘click the mouse twice’, you think of Gerry being hit twice by Tom so you feel excited.
Many taboo terms are result of this.
LINGUISTICS 1123/4/20
3.6 Collocative meaning
The associations a word acquires on account of the meanings of words which tend to occur in its environment.
pretty: girl, boy, woman, flower, garden, colour, village, etc.
handsome: boy, man, car, vessel, overcoat, airliner, typewriter, etc.
LINGUISTICS 1223/4/20
3.7 Thematic meaning What is communicated by the way in whic
h a speaker or writer organizes the message, in terms of ordering, focus, and emphasis.
Mrs Bessie Smith donated the first prize. The first prize was donated by Mrs Bessie
Smith. They stopped at the end of the corridor. At the end of the corridor, they stopped.
LINGUISTICS 1323/4/20
4. The Theory of Reference Words → Meaning: Words ‘name’ or ‘refer to’ thing
s -- Platonic Words→Concepts→Things: Ogden & Richards
thought/concept/image
symbolizes refers to
symbol -------------------------------------- referent(word) stands for (object)
LINGUISTICS 1423/4/20
5. Sense
‘Meaning’ is not some kind of ‘entity’ separate from language.
That words ‘have meaning’ means only that they are used in a certain way in a sentence. There is no ‘meaning’ beyond the meaning of individual words and sentences.
LINGUISTICS 1523/4/20
‘The meaning of a word is its use in the language’. (Ludwig Wittgenstein)
Meaning is studied by making detailed analyses of the way words and sentences are used in specific contexts.
Reference: how language refers to this external world
Sense: the way people relate words to each other within the framework of their language
LINGUISTICS 1623/4/20
The family tree
舅父 = ‘mother’s brother’
叔叔 = ‘father’s younger brother’
伯父 = ‘father’s elder brother’
姨母 = ‘mother’s sister’
姑母 = ‘father’s sister’
LINGUISTICS 1723/4/20
6. Sense Relations
Synonymy
Antonymy
Hyponymy
LINGUISTICS 1823/4/20
Gradable
Complementary
Converse
6.1 Synonymy
buy/purchase thrifty/economical/stingy autumn/fall flat/apartment tube/underground
LINGUISTICS 1923/4/20
6.2 Gradable antonymy
good ----------------------- bad long ----------------------- short big ----------------------- small Can be modified by adverbs of
degree like very. Can have comparative forms. Can be asked with how.
LINGUISTICS 2023/4/20
6.3 Complementary antonymy
alive : dead male : female present : absent innocent : guilty
LINGUISTICS 2123/4/20
odd : evenodd : even pass : failpass : fail boy : girlboy : girl hit : misshit : miss
6.4 Converse antonymy
buy : sell lend : borrow give : receive parent : child husband : wife
LINGUISTICS 2223/4/20
teacher : studentteacher : student above : belowabove : below before : afterbefore : after host : guesthost : guest employer : employeeemployer : employee
6.5 Hyponymy
Inclusiveness A is included in / a kind of B. Cf.: chair and furniture, rose and flower Superordinate/hypernym: the more gener
al term Hyponym: the more specific term Co-hyponyms: members of the same clas
s
LINGUISTICS 2323/4/20
Animal
bird fish insect animal
human animal
tiger lion elephant ...
LINGUISTICS 2423/4/20
7. Componential Analysis
HUMAN man (ADULT, MALE) woman (ADULT, FEMALE) boy (NON-ADULT, MALE) girl (NON-ADULT, FEMALE)
LINGUISTICS 2523/4/20
7.1 Animal words
MALE FEMALE NON-ADULT
bull cow calf
ram ewe lamb
boar sow piglet
23/4/20 26LINGUISTICS
7.2 Domestic animals
bull ram boar cow ewe sow calf lamb piglet
M + + + — — — ± ± ±
F — — — + + + ± ± ±
23/4/20 27LINGUISTICS
7.3 English motion verbs
NATURAL HURRIED FORWARD ONE FOOT
ALWAYS ON GROUND
walk + ━ + +
march ━ + + +
run ━ + + ━
limp ━ ━ + +
23/4/20 28LINGUISTICS
7.4 More complex ones
father: PARENT (x, y) & MALE (x) x is a parent of y, and x is male. take: CAUSE (x, (HAVE (x, y))) x causes x to have y. give: CAUSE (x, (~HAVE (x, y))) x causes x not to have y.
LINGUISTICS 2923/4/20
8. Meaning & Syntactic Structure
The meaning of a sentence is obviously related to the meanings of the words used in it, but it is also obvious that sentence meaning is not simply the sum total of the words.
LINGUISTICS 3023/4/20
The cat is chasing the mouse. The mouse is chasing the cat.
I have read that book. That book I have read.
The daughter of Queen Elizabeth’s son is the son of Queen Elizabeth’s daughter.
LINGUISTICS 3123/4/20
8.1 Compositionality
An integrated theory Katz & Fodor (1963): The structure of a
semantic theory. A 40-page long paper published in Language.
The method itself is years out of date but the debate about the principle of compositionality is by no means over (Cruse, 2004: 77).
LINGUISTICS 3223/4/20
The idea behind the principle was to solve the problem of generating grammatical but incorrect sentences like Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.
The purpose was to wage an attack on Chomsky’s basis assumption that correct sentences could be generated by syntactic transformations alone, disregarding the semantic rules at Surface Structure.
LINGUISTICS 3323/4/20
Although many semanticists turned away from Chomsky by developing formal semantic theories by themselves, Chomsky did admit soon that semantic rules would be found at Deep Structure as well as Surface Structure (EST) and later on placed semantic rules/representation in the S-Structure altogether (since REST). Other ideas were also incorporated into Chomsky’s later models of grammar, e.g. the concept of projection.
LINGUISTICS 3423/4/20
According to the principle of compositionality, each word in the lexicon is equipped with certain components and combinations of words into sentences must go through certain selection restrictions in order to produce acceptable sentences. Thus we can say colorful ball because
LINGUISTICS 3523/4/20
colorful {Adj}
a. (Color) [abounding in contrast or variety of bright colors] <(Physical Object) or (Social Activity)>
b. (Evaluative) [having distinctive character, vividness, or picturesqueness] <(Aesthetic Object) or (Social Activity)>
LINGUISTICS 3623/4/20
ball {NC}
a. (Social Activity) (Large) (Assembly) [for the purpose of social dancing]
b. (Physical Object) [having globular shape]
c. (Physical Object) [solid missile for projection by engine of war]
LINGUISTICS 3723/4/20
Then it is possible to work out four readings of the combinations of color and ball, and further combinations with other words (projections) will determine which of the four is the actual meaning in the sentence John hit the colorful balls and We had a colorful ball last night.
LINGUISTICS 3823/4/20
8.2. Noncompositional meaning Idioms: cannot be built up as the sum of
its parts. Idioms are phrases derived by metaphor and other types of semantic extension.
get up on the wrong side of the bed in the doghouse green with envy kick the bucket face the music
LINGUISTICS 3923/4/20
kick the bucket: which?
A. Because she got mad, that hen kicked a bucket.
B. A cartoon painter about to kick a bucket of paint.
C. the process of dying
LINGUISTICS 4023/4/20
Frozen metaphors: a class of idiom-like expressions which may show some of the features of syntactic frozenness typical of idioms, such as resistance to modification, transformation, and so on, but which differ from idioms in an important respect: the effect of synonym substitution is not a complete collapse of the non-literal reading.
LINGUISTICS 4123/4/20
The ball’s in your court now.
on your side of the net
A cat can look at a queen.
mouse an archbishop
I can read her like an open book.
decipher
He has one foot in the grave.
both feet tomb
one leg coffin
LINGUISTICS 4223/4/20
I gave him a piece of my mind.
part conceptual system
He drives me up the wall.
forces room partition
He has a bee in his bonnet about it.
hornet helmet
LINGUISTICS 4323/4/20
8.4 Collocations
g rea t h ea v y h ig h ex trem e d eep sev ere
fro st - + - ? - +
ra in - + - - - -
w in d ? - + - - -
23/4/20 44LINGUISTICS
8.5 Clichés
I’ve made my position absolutely clear.
I’ve given an unambiguous exposition of my views.
It’s raining dogs and cats. He arrived safe and sound.
LINGUISTICS 4523/4/20
8.6 Noun compounds
pocket knife: knife that can be carried in the pocket
kitchen knife: knife for use in the kitchen
meat knife: knife for cutting meat tablecloth: cloth used to cover a
table dishcloth: cloth used to wipe
dishes
LINGUISTICS 4623/4/20
8.7 “Active zones” a red hat: whole hat is
red a red book: outside
covers are red a red apple: a
significant portion of outer skin is red a yellow peach: inner
flesh is yellow a pink grapefruit: inner
flesh is pinkLINGUISTICS 4723/4/20
a red traffic sign: symbols only are red
a red pencil: (1) red on outside; (2) writes red
red eyes: ‘white’ of eyes is red
blue eyes: iris is blue
LINGUISTICS 4823/4/20
9. Propositional Logic
Truth condition: conditions which must hold for the
sentence to be used to make a true statement (at least if it is used literally). Thus, before we can truthfully say, on some occasion, The cat is on the mat, there must be some relevant feline occupying a specific position relative to an appropriate item of floor covering.
LINGUISTICS 4923/4/20
Those aspects of the meaning of a sentence which determine its truth conditions are collectively known as the propositional content of the sentence.
Two sentences with identical propositional content will yield statements with the same truth values on all occasions of use, as for instance, John caressed Mary and Mary was caressed by John.
By the same token, if two sentences have different propositional content, there will necessarily exist some conceivable situation in which they will yield statements with opposite truth values.
LINGUISTICS 5023/4/20
Proposition: a statement, with a truth value (true or false), eg
The earth is flat. The earth goes around the s
un. All teachers are female.
LINGUISTICS 5123/4/20
9.1 Logical relations
Not ﹁ / ~ : ¬P And : P Q∧ ∧ Or : P Q, ∨ ∨ ﹁ P Q∨ If … then →: P→Q Equals to ↔ : P↔ Q
LINGUISTICS 5223/4/20
9.1.1 Truth value: Not ¬
P ¬P
T
F
F
T
23/4/20 53LINGUISTICS
9.1.2 Truth value: And ∧
P Q P∧ Q
F F F
F T F
T F F
T T T
23/4/20 54LINGUISTICS
9.1.3 Truth value: Or ∨: P∨Q
P Q P∨ Q
F F F
F T T
T F T
T T T
23/4/20 55LINGUISTICS
9.1.4 Truth value: Or ∨: ¬P∨Q
¬P Q ¬P∨ Q
F F T
F T T
T F F
T T T
23/4/20 56LINGUISTICS
9.1.5 Truth value: If…then →
P Q P→ Q
F F T
F T T
T F F
T T T
23/4/20 57LINGUISTICS
9.1.6 Truth value: Equals to ↔
P Q PQ
F F T
F T F
T F F
T T T
23/4/20 58LINGUISTICS
9.2 Predicate Logic
Argument and Predicate John runs. runs’ (John’) or R(j) John loves Mary. loves’ (John’, Mary’)
or L(j, m) John gave Mary a book. gave’ (John’,
Mary’, book’) or G(j, m, b)
LINGUISTICS 5923/4/20
One-place predicate: run Two-place predicate: love Three-place predicate: give
LINGUISTICS 6023/4/20
Quantifiers: all ∀ , some ∃ All teachers are female. ∀ x (T(x) F(x)) = For all x, if x is a te
acher, x is female. Some teachers are female. ∃ x (T(x)∧F(x)) = There are some x’s t
hat are both teachers and female.
LINGUISTICS 6123/4/20
All teachers are female. ∀ x (T(x)F(x)) John is a teacher. T(j) Hence, John is female. ∴ F(j)
LINGUISTICS 6223/4/20
5.4 componential analysis
What is it? The relation between it and the distinctive
features of a phoneme in phonology The advantage of it Problems with it
5.5 sentence meaning
1. 2. 3.
5.5.1 an integrated theory
The definition of it Suggested by ? How was it put forward? The process How it went? Problems with it
Grammatical classification ( grammatical markers ) dictionary part ( syntactic markers) general one (semantic
markers) Integrated theory Semantic information idiosyncratic one ( distinguishers) Projection rules
Problems: 1. 2. 3.
5.5.2 logical semantics
The different stress of traditional grammarians and philosophers
propositional logic Two ideas predicate logic
Propositional logic
What is it? How it goes? Why it can not be applied to the natural lang
uages? The difference between propositional logic a
nd predicate logic命题逻辑不能处理的问题
Knowledge of predicate logic Propositions with “all” or “some” The universal quantifier “all” The existential quantifier “some” The difference of the two How the two relate to each other set theory: another way to explain the validity of
inferences with the universal qualifier and existential qualifier
The development of logic semantics
Montague semantics ( Montague grammar)