Download - Chapter 15 Capital Budgeting Extensions
Chapter 15
CAPITAL BUDGETING : EXTENSIONS
The central theme of economics is the allocation of limited resources to various needs in order to maximize our happiness or satisfaction.
Similarly, in FINANCE the central theme is the allocation of limited capital to various projects in order to maximize our returns.
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
2
OUTLINE
• Choice between Projects of Unequal Life
• Interrelationship between Investment and Financing Aspects
• Capital Budgeting under Constraints
• Value of Options
• Sources of Positive NPV
• Qualitative Influences
• Corporate Strategy and Capital Budgeting
• Organisational Considerations
• Capital Budgeting in Public Sector Undertakings
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
3
CHOICE BETWEEN PROJECTS OF UNEQUAL LIFE
Machine A Machine B• Investment Rs.75,000 Rs.50,000• Life 5 years 3 years• Annual operating costs
Rs.12,000 Rs.20,000
Present Value of All Costs
A : 75,000 + 12,000 x PVIFA (5 yrs, 12%) = Rs.118,260
B : 50,000 + 15,000 x PVIFA (3 yrs, 12%) = Rs. 86,030
This comparison is flawed because it overlooks the fact that machine B has a shorter life and has to be replaced earlier
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
4
CHOICE BETWEEN PROJECTS OF UNEQUAL LIFE
For a proper comparison of the two alternatives, that have different lives, we have to convert the present value of costs into a uniform annual equivalent (UAE) figure.
PV of CostUAE =
PVIFAr,n
Machine A : UAE = = 32,804
Machine B : UAE = = 35,816
Since UAE (A) < UAE (B), A is preferable.
118,2603.605
86,0302.402
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
5
INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INVESTMENT AND FINANCING ASPECTS
Projects tend to differ in their debt capacity and other
features like availability of subsidies. Hence financing and
investment decisions are likely to be interrelated. When
this is so, we must take into account the financing impact
of an investment decision. This may be done by calculating
the adjusted NPV.
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
6
ADJUSTED NPV
Adjusted Base case
NPV NPV
Base case NPV is the NPV under the assumption that the
project is all-equity financed.
= +NPV of financingdecisions associated with the project
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
7
ADJUSTED NPVInvestment : Rs.5 millionNet cash flow : Rs.1 million per year for 8 yearsOpportunity cost of capital : 15 percentCost of issuing equity : 5 percentDebt finance : Rs.2.4 millionInterest rate : 14 percentRepayment period : 8 equal annual instalmentTax rate : 60 percent
Base Case NPV 8- 5,000,000 + = - Rs.512,700
t = 1
1,000,000(1.15)t
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
8
ADJUSTMENT FOR ISSUE COST
Equity finance : Rs.2,600,000
Since issue costs would absorb 5 percent of the gross
proceeds, the firm will have to issue Rs.2,736,842
(Rs.2,600,000/0.95) of equity stock in order to realise a net
amount of Rs.2,600,000. So, issue costs = Rs.136,842.
Adjusted NPV = - Rs.512,700 – Rs.136,842
= - Rs.649,542
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
9
ADJUSTMENT FOR TAX SHIELD ASSOCIATED WITH DEBT
(Rs in '000)
Year Debt outstanding at Interest Tax shield Present value of tax shield the beginning 14% discount rate
1 2400 336 202 177 2 2100 294 176 135 3 1800 252 151 102 4 1500 210 126 75 5 1200 168 101 52 6 900 126 76 34 7 600 84 50 20 8 300 42 25 9
Total 604
Adjusted NPV = Base case NPV – Issue cost + PV of tax shield= - Rs 512,700 – Rs.136,842 + Rs.604,000= - Rs.45,542
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
10
CAPITAL BUDGETING UNDER CONSTRAINTS
FEASIBLE COMBINATIONS APPROACH
1. Define all combinations of projects which are feasible, given the capital budget restrictions and project interdependencies.
2 Choose the feasible combination that has the highest NPV.
Let us find out most desirable feasible combination out of the following with a capital budget constraint of Rs. 3 million: (what will happen if there are 50 projects?)
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
11
FEASIBLE COMBINATIONS APPROACH
Project Outlay NPVA 1,800,000 750,000B 1,500,000 600,000C 1,200,000 500,000D 750,000 360,000E 600,000 300,000
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
12
CAPITAL BUDGETING UNDER CONSTRAINTS LINEAR PROGRAMMING MODEL
n Maximise NPVj Xj j=1 Subject to
m CFjt Xj < Kt (t = 1, 2, …, n)
j=1
0 < Xj < 1
where NPVj = net present value of project j Xj = proportion of project j accepted CFjt = cash outflow required for project j in period t Kt = capital budget available in period t
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
13
More about Linear Programming (LP)• It is possible to: • allow carry forward of cash from one period
to another• Introduce non financial constraints like
availability of material• Even though ideally suited for capital
budgeting problems with limited resources, LP is not used widely as:
1. It assumes all future investments are known2. For truly worthwhile opportunities, capital
may not be a constraint
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
14
Value of Options 1 Identify Options• In real life, two types of options seen:1. An incremental option opens opportunities
(beachhead) to make profitable investments in future e g Vedanta Group
2. A flexibility option gives wider latitude in manufacturing so that it can cope better with unforeseen changes & exploit future profitable opportunities e g design of RIL refineries
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
15
2 Analyze Environmental Uncertainty• In uncertain environment, options are
valuable e g value of flexi raw crude usage at RIL refineries in a highly volatile crude market. Flexibility options more valuable in an uncertain environment
• Often such investments motivated by future uncertainty, not current profitability e g Mittal consolidating steel making capacities around the globe
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
16
REAL OPTIONS
• Investment timing option
• Expansion option
• Growth option
• Shutdown option
• Abandonment option
• Flexibility option
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
17
3 Value the Options• Black-Scholes Options Pricing
Model gives these insights:1. The greater the uncertainty in a
project, the higher the value of options embedded in it
2. The longer the duration of a project, the higher the value of options inherent in it
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
18
Cash flows : 75 Options : 25
Cash flows : 50 Options : 50
Cash flows : 95 Options : 5
Cash flows : 75 Options : 25
HIGH
LOW
LOW HIGH
PROJECT DURATION
Environmental Uncertainty
RELATIVE VALUES OF CASH
FLOWS AND OPTIONS
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
19
SOURCES OF POSITIVE NPV (CEG, MPT)1. Cost advantage• Accumulated experience & comparative edge on the learning curve e
g Hero Honda, Maruti• Monopolistic access to low cost materials e g TISCO• A favorable location e g Rs. 60000 / Nano?2 Economies of scale• Increase in the scale of production (RIL), marketing (Godrej) or
distribution (HUL) leading to a decline in cost per unit. The greater the Capital requirement for economy of scale, the higher the entry barrier
3 Government policy• Govt. Policies that create entry barriers like:• Restrictive licensing e g Reliance Communications• Import restrictions & / or high tariff walls• Environmental controls • Special tax relief's e g SEZ
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
20
SOURCES OF POSITIVE NPV4 Marketing reach• A penetrating marketing reach is an important source of
Competitive Advantage • e g AVON’s worldwide network of 1.2 million independent
sales representatives almost impossible to replicate• Or, HUL’s distribution too costly to replicate
5 Product differentiation• By effective advertising & superior marketing• Exceptional service e g pizza in 20 minutes or free• Innovative product features e g Nokia• High quality and dependability e g Godrej furniture
6 Technological edge• Examples: IBM, XEROX, Dr Reddy’s Labs,
Lakshmi Machine Works
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
21
QUALITATIVE INFLUENCES• Intuition – right hemisphere – judgment, not analysis• Vision – serves as super ordinate goal • Superstition – Astrology – They help relieve anxiety, impart a sense of control, encourage necessary activity• Politics – Internal Political Games• Sponsorship – decision is a bet on the sponsor, his commitment, track record, ability to overcome obstacles, deliver goods• Intangible benefits – like enhancing flexibility, technological capability, improving product attractiveness, bringing a sense of pride, pleasing work environment, raising morale
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
22
Some examples of Vision Statements
IBM Value added leadership positionRIL Integrated, world class capacity
empireHonda No. 1 world producer of best mobikesBajaj Auto Global PlayerITC India InternationalTata Motors Technological competenceBell System Our business is serviceRanbaxy A research based International
Pharmaceutical company
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
23
How to strengthen the Links between Corporate Strategy & Capital Budgeting• Long range planning should precede
capital budgeting• Long Range plans should be formalized
& communicated to all involved in capital budgeting
• Investment proposals should be viewed in the context of the critical premises of Long Range Plans
• Allocate to missions rather than to activities or divisions
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
24
Business Strength
Strong Average Weak
Invest Invest Hold
Invest Hold Divest
Hold Divest Divest
High
Medium
Low
Attractiveness
INDUSTRY
STRATEGY AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION
General Electric’s Stoplight Matrix
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
25
AN APPROACH TO DECISION-MAKING
No Yes Yes No Yes No
Consistency with Strategy ?
Accept Positive NPV ? Reject
Significant Intangibles ?
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
26
ORGANISATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
• Compatibility with resources – 2
• Controllability – why pilot needed in a plane?
• Executive management endorsement @ LRP,
funds planning, development of budgetary controls
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
27
CAPITAL BUDGETING IN PUBLIC
SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS
• Role of the Public Investment Board (1972) – headed by Secretary, Expenditure + sec’s to Planning Commission, DEA, PM, DPE, Ministry of Industrial Development, & Administrative ministry bringing up the proposal.
• Guidelines Provided by the Government – 1975 – Guidelines for Preparation of Feasibility Repots for
Industrial Projects - 1996 – Planning Commission issued A MANUAL ON FEASIBILITY STUDIES
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
28
SUMMING UP
• For a proper comparison of alternate projects with different lives we have to look at the UAE figure.
• When investment and financing aspects of a project are inter-related, adjusted NPV is defined as:
Base case NPV + NPV of the ‘financing aspects’
• Mathematical programming models are helpful in coping with the problem of capital budgeting under constraints
• There are several options found in capital projects such as investment timing option, expansion option, growth option, shutdown option, abandonment option and flexibility option.
04/07/23 Capital Budgeting allocates limited capital to maximize our returns
29
• The important entry barriers that result in positive NPV projects are as follows: economies of scale, product differentiation, cost advantage, marketing reach, technological edge, and governmental policy.
• Intuition, vision, superstition, politics, project sponsorship, and intangible benefits are key qualitative influences bearing on capital expenditure decisions.
• Since the resource allocation strategy of a firm shapes, guides, and circumscribes individual project decisions, the desirability of a project cannot be assessed without considering the strategy of the firm.