Download - Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing COMS 6998-8, Spring 2012

Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing (COMS 6998-8)

1

Cellular Networks and Mobile ComputingCOMS 6998-8, Spring 2012

Instructor: Li Erran Li ([email protected])

http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~coms6998-8/4/2/2012: Mobile Cloud Computing

4/2/12

http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~coms6998-8/




Mobile Cloud Computing (mCloud) today

• Apple iCloud– Store content in cloud and

sync to all registered devices

– Hosted by Windows Azure and Amazon AWS

– iCloud Storage APIs support third-party app document syncing

24/2/12 Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing (COMS 6998-8)

Mobile Cloud Computing today (Cont’d)

• Amazon Silk browser– Accelerates web access– Learns user behavior and

precache– Intelligently partition work

between local and Amazon cloud


mCloud Fundamental Challenges

• What architecture best supports mCloud?• What programming model best enables client

to tap mCloud resources?• What are basic services or building blocks for

mCloud?• What best supports service interaction?


mCloud Architecture• Resource-intensive mobile

applications– Face recognition for social

networking app– Gesture recognition for control

media app – Object and post recognition for

augmented reality app• End-to-end latency and througput

matters for crisp interaction– Augmented reality need to display

results within 1 sec– Need high data rate processing

capability, low frame rate can miss gesture

5

Delay, loss on frame rate of video stream transfer [Odessa, 2011]


mCloud Architecture (Cont’d)• WAN performance

– First hop latency in 3G is 200ms– Verizon LTE :128ms, 6.44 Mbps

downlink, 5Mbps uplink [Pcworld, March 2011]

• There is a need for a middle tier

• cloudlet = (compute cluster+ wireless access point+ wired Internet access+ no battery limitations)

• “data center in a box”6

“Anatomizing Application Performance Differences on Smartphones”, MobiSys 2010 (Huang et al)


mCloud Architecture (Cont’d)

• Cloudlet possible locations• Cellular providers has a unique advantage

7

BS

Wireless Core

Internet

WiFi AP

RDCA1

RDCA2

RDCB1

RDCB2

Regional Data centers (RDC)

RNC

Storage nodes

Computenodes

Possible locationsof cloudlet


mCloud Programming Model• MAUI: RPC based offloading architecture• CloneCloud: tight synchronization between cloud and

phone• Odessa: data-flow graph to exploit parallelism in

perception applications• Orelans: a new programming model based on grains• MAUI, CloneCloud , Odessa all have profiler, solver

8

MAUI CloneCloud Odessa Orleans

Remote execution unit

Methods (RMI)

Threads Tasks Grains


mCloud Programming Model: MAUI

• Combine extensive profiling with an ILP solver– Makes dynamic offload decisions– Optimize for energy reduction– Profile: device, network, application

• Leverage modern language runtime (.NET CLR)– Portability:

• Mobile (ARM) vs Server (x86)• .NET Framework Common Intermediate Language

– Type-Safety and Serialization: • Automate state extraction

– Reflection: • Identifies methods with [Remoteable] tag• Automates generation of RPC stubs


Maui serverSmartphone

Application

Client Proxy

Profiler

Solver

Maui Runtime

Server Proxy

Profiler

Solver

Maui Runtime

Application

RPC

RPC

Maui Controller

mCloud Programming Model: MAUI (Cont’d)

Intercepts Application CallsSynchronizes State

Chooses local or remote

Handles Errors

Provides runtime information

• MAUI architecture

4/2/12 Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing (COMS 6998-8) 10Source: MAUI Mobisys presentation

MAUI Profiler

ProfilerCallgraph

Execution Time

State size

Network Latency

Network Bandwidth

Device ProfileCPU Cycles

Network Power CostNetwork DelayComputational Delay

Computational Power CostComputational Delay

Annotated Callgraph

Source: MAUI Mobisys presentation4/2/12Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing

(COMS 6998-8) 11

MAUI Solver

B900 mJ15ms

C5000 mJ3000 ms

1000mJ25000 m

J D15000 mJ12000 ms

1000

0 m

J

A

Computation energy and delay for execution

Energy and delay for state transfer

A sample callgraph

Source: MAUI Mobisys presentation


12

Is Global Program Analysis Needed?

FindMatch900 mJ

InitializeFaceRecognizer

5000 mJ

1000mJ25000 m

J DetectAndExtract Faces

15000 mJ

1000

0 m

J

UserInterface

Yes! – This simple example from Face Recognition app shows why local analysis fails.

Cheaper to do local


4/2/12 Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing (COMS 6998-8) 13


FindMatch900 mJ


5000 mJ

1000mJ25000 m

J DetectAndExtract Faces

15000 mJ

1000

0 m

J

UserInterface

Yes! – This simple example from Face Recognition app shows why local analysis fails.

Cheaper to do local

Cheaper to do local




FindMatch


1000mJ

DetectAndExtract Faces

UserInterface 25900mJ

Cheaper to offload



15

Can MAUI Adapt to Changing Conditions?

• Adapt to:– Network Bandwidth/Latency Changes– Variability on method’s computational requirements

• Experiment:– Modified off the shelf arcade game application– Physics Modeling (homing missiles)– Evaluated under different latency settings

Source: MAUI Mobisys presentation4/2/12 Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing (COMS 6998-8) 16

DoLevel

HandleMissiles

DoFrame

HandleEnemies

HandleBonuses11KB + missiles

11KB

+

miss

iles

missiles

*Missiles take around 60 bytes each

11KB + missiles

Required state is smaller

Complexity increases with # of missiles

Can MAUI Adapt to Changing Conditions?



17

Case 1

DoLevel

HandleMissiles

DoFrame

HandleEnemies

HandleBonuses


Zero Missiles Low latency (RTT < 10ms)

Computation cost is close to zero

Offload starting at DoLevel


4/2/12Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing

(COMS 6998-8) 18

Case 2

DoLevel

HandleMissiles

DoFrame

HandleEnemies

HandleBonuses


5 Missiles Some latency (RTT = 50ms)

Most of the computation cost

Very expensive to offload everything

Little state to offload

Only offload Handle Missiles

Source: MAUI Mobisys presentation4/2/12 Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing

(COMS 6998-8) 19

MAUI Implementation• Platform– Windows Mobile 6.5– .NET Framework 3.5– HTC Fuze Smartphone– Monsoon power monitor

• Applications– Chess– Face Recognition– Arcade Game– Voice-based translator


Questions

• How much can MAUI reduce energy consumption?• How much can MAUI improve performance?• Can MAUI Run Resource-Intensive Applications?


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35Smartphone onlyMAUI (Wi-Fi, 10ms RTT)MAUI (Wi-Fi, 25ms RTT)MAUI (Wi-Fi, 50ms RTT)MAUI (Wi-Fi, 100ms RTT)MAUI* (3G, 220ms RTT)

Ener

gy (J

oule

s)

How much can MAUI reduce energy consumption?

Big savings even on 3GAn order of magnitude improvement on Wi-Fi

Face Recognizer


How much can MAUI improve performance?

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

15,000

18,000

21,000Smartphone onlyMAUI (Wi-Fi, 10ms RTT)MAUI (Wi-Fi, 25ms RTT)MAUI (Wi-Fi, 50ms RTT)MAUI (Wi-Fi, 100ms RTT)MAUI* (3G, 220ms RTT)

Exec

ution

Dur

ation

(ms)

Improvement of around an order of magnitude

Face Recognizer

Source: MAUI presentation4/2/12 Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing (COMS 6998-8) 23

Latency to server impacts the opportunities for fine-grained offload

0

20

40

60Smartphone onlyMAUI (Wi-Fi, 10ms RTT)MAUI (Wi-Fi, 25ms RTT)MAUI (Wi-Fi, 50ms RTT)MAUI (WiFi, 100ms RTT)MAUI* (3G, 220ms RTT)

Ener

gy (J

oule

s)

Up to 40% energy savings on Wi-Fi

Solver would decide not to offloadArcade Game


Can MAUI Run Resource-Intensive Applications?

00:00 00:1700:3400:51 01:0901:26 01:4302:0002:18 02:3502:520

102030405060708090

100

CPU1CPU2

Time

CPU

Con

sum

ption

(%)

CPU Intensive even on a Core 2 Duo PC

Can be run on the phone with MAUI

Translator


Conclusions

• MAUI enables developers to:– Bypass the resource limitations of handheld devices– Low barrier entry: simple program annotations

• For a resource-intensive application– MAUI reduced energy consumed by an order of magnitude– MAUI improved application performance similarly

• MAUI adapts to:– Changing network conditions – Changing applications CPU demands


mCloud Programming Model: CloneCloud

• Offloading decision done at beginning of execution


The Before-After Picture

PhoneUI W

Phone

Clone

CloudWUI W'

Clone

Clone

Clone

4/2/12 Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing (COMS 6998-8) 28Courtesy: Byung-Gon Chun et. al.

CloneCloud v1 Architecture

VMMHW

PartitionAnalyzer

OSVirtual HW

Migration

Mobile Device

RuntimeOSHW

Application

App.VM

Man

ager Migration

Clone VM

ProfilerOS

Virtual HW

Application

App.VM

ManagerProfiler


AppVM Clones

• Virtual machine of entire client device– Android x86 VM natively executed on VMWare in

an x86 machine

• Synchronized file systems


Partitioning

Where to partition code, satisfying any constraints for correctness,

so as to optimize for current conditions


Automatic Partitioning Framework

Partition Analyzer

Applicationbinary

Partitioningconstraints

Static analysis

location-constraints

Profilinginputs

Dynamicprofiling

cost-annotatedexecutions

Optimizationsolver

Optimal partitioning

pointsIdentify valid split points

Construct cost models

Pick best choice for an objective


Partitioning: Static Analysis• Partitioning points

– Restrict to method entry/exit

• Identify “pinned” methods– Identify framework library methods

• Identify mutually dependent native state– Class natives stay together

• Collect static control flow– Who calls whom


Partitioning: Profiling

• Pick k invocations• For each invocation– Run app on mobile

device– Run app on clone

• For each method– Execution time– Context size entry/exit– Estimate of energy

consumption

a30, 2100

c60, 810

a'11, 1200

main

main'19, 9

5

b50, 5900

a


Partitioning: Intuition

• Partitioning points splice profile trees together• Context size used to estimate network cost

a30, 2100

c60, 810

a'11, 1200

main

main'19, 9

5

b50, 5900

a a

ca'

main

main'

b50, 520

a

MobileDevice Clone


Partitioning: Optimization

• List all partitioning choices

• Remove partitioning choices that do not meet the constraints

• For each choice, compute total time

• Find the minimum


Distributed Execution

How to seamlessly execute the partitions of an application locally and remotely


Migration Architecture

App-VM

Migrator

NodeManager

NodeManagerNet

(1) (4)

Mobile Device Clone

Partitions

App-VM

Application

Migrator

App-VM

Migrator

Application

App-VM

Migrator

Clone

App-VM

Migrator

Clone

App-VM

Migrator

(2)

(3)


Migration: Suspend-Transmit-Resume

Mobile device Clone

Transmit

At migration pointSuspend threadCapture context Transmit Launch process

Patch migrated contextResume thread

Suspend threadCapture contextMerge migrated

contextResume thread

At reintegration point


Migration Challenges

• Regular IDs (references) not globally unique– Address space difference between mobile device

and clone

• System objects created at boot everywhere


Migration: References in Motion

(1) Mobile Device

Reference MID CID0x01 1 null0x02 2 null0x03 3 null

migration

New objects

GC’ed

(2) Clone

Reference MID CID0x21 1 110x22 2 120x23 3 130x24 null 140x22 null 15

rein

tegr

ation(3) Mobile Device

Reference MID CID0x01 1 110x02 2 120x03 3 130x04 4 140x05 5 15


The CloneCloud v1 Prototype

• On Android platform + x86 VM clones• Modified DalvikVM to support thread-level

migration and dynamic profiling• Implemented NodeManager to handle

registration and communication• Static analysis using JChord


Evaluation Setup

• Test applications– Image search– Virus scanning – Privacy-preserving user profiling

• Phone: Android Dev Phone 1• Clone VM: a server with a 3.0GHz Xeon CPU

running VMWare ESX 4.1 in Intel IT infrastructures

• Wireless connection: WiFi, T-mobile 3G4/2/12 Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing

(COMS 6998-8) 43Courtesy: Byung-Gon Chun et. al.

Execution Time Comparison (Image Search)

Exec

utio

n tim

e (s

econ

ds)

1 image 10 images 100 images0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Phone(Local)

CloneCloud(Wi-Fi)

CloneCloud(3G)

20x

1x


Energy Consumption Comparison (Image Search)

Ener

gy c

onsu

mpt

ion

(J)

1 image 10 images 100 images0

300

600

900

1200

1500

1800

Phone(Local)CloneCloud(Wi-Fi)CloneCloud(3G)

20x

1x


Discussion

• Applicability is application-specific– Application characteristics– Execution mechanism

• A design point with focus on automation– Apps structured to be more amenable to

migration• Clone VMs in untrusted environments


Conclusion

• CloneCloud: automatic partitioning and migration to enhance mobile applications – Use of clones– Flexible app partitioning– Seamless migration

Lots of excitements in mobile cloud computing


mCloud Programming Model: Odessa• Data flow graph: vertices are stages; edges are connectors;

stages share nothing

48Face Recognition Gesture Recognition4/2/12 Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing (COMS 6998-8)Object Pose Estimation

Source: Odessa Mobisys presentation

mCloud Programming Model: Odessa (Cont’d)

• Offloading DEcision System for Streaming Applications

NetworkApplication

Sprout

Odessa

Mobile Device

Application

SproutOdessa Profiler

Cloud Infrastructure

OdessaRuntime Profiler Decision

Engine


(COMS 6998-8) 49Source: Odessa Mobisys presentation

mCloud Programming Model: Odessa (Cont’d)

50

B2

Network

CB A

B1 A

Application Data Flow Graph Screen

C

Local Execution

Cost

RemoteExecution

Cost>4/2/12 Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing (COMS 6998-8)Smartphone

Cloud Infrastructure

Incremental decisions adapt quickly to input and platform variability.

Source: Odessa Mobisys presentation

mCloud Programming Model: Orleans

51

• Software framework and runtime to make cloud programming easier and more productive

• Shift burden of correctness and performance from developer to Orleans system

• Experimental system from Microsoft Research

• Radically simplified, prescriptive programming model – Actors– Asynchronous messaging– Lightweight transactions– Persistence– Adaptive performance management

Application

Orleans

.NET

Azure

Servers


mCloud Programming Model: Orleans (Cont’d)

• Actor based: fine-grain distributed objects are natural abstraction

• Grains partition data• Secure and isolated computation with clear

points of communications– Enable computation replication

• Natural integration with persistent storage– Grain resides on disk until activated

52


mCloud Programming Model: Orleans (Cont’d)

53

Field ValueName “John Doe”Email “john.doe@hotmail

.com”Address “123 Main St.,

Anywhere UR 01234”

Products

Grain ID1Grain

ID2

Checkout

AddProduct

RemoveProduct

Grain (actor)

Customer GrainMessages

State

MethodsMessage Queue


(COMS 6998-8) Courtesy Jim Larus

Support for Service Interaction

• Synergy of mCloud services– Shared basic services enables more efficient usage of

cloud resources(e.g. shared memcache eliminates data duplication of individual services)

– Co-location makes mashed-up applications to achieve native performance (file transfer becomes an object reference)

• mCloud offers shared platform services• mCloud optimizes service interaction through

active VM migration544/2/12 Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing

(COMS 6998-8)

Closing Thoughts

• Cloud computing needs to advance in architecture, programming model, platform services to revolutionize mobile computing


Useful Tools

• Hprof: a heap/CPU profiling tool• Jchord: a static analysis tool on Java bytecode• Dummynet (ipfw): simulates/enforces queue

and bandwidth limitations, delays, packet losses

• OpenCV: a library of programming functions for real time computer vision


Download - Cellular Networks and Mobile Computing COMS 6998-8, Spring 2012

Top Related