Download - BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT - Ribble Valley
LLOYD BORE LTD
OFFICE 4 , MAUDL AND S
MAUDE STREET , KENDAL
CUMBR IA, LA9 4 QD
Tel : 01 53 9 7 38 411
Fa x: 01 227 46 4 3 41
ke n dal @l loy d bor e.co . uk
www. l loy d bor e.co . u k
B O T A N I C A L S U R V E Y R E P O R T
RURAL SOLUTIONS
SYKES HOLT
MYERSCOUGH SMITHY ROAD
MELLOR BROOK, BLACKBURN
REF NO. C410 -RP04
STAT U S: PL ANNING DOC U MENT
CREATED : 1 7/1 2/2 01 5
1
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 2
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 3
Instruction ............................................................................................................................................. 3
Description of proposed development ................................................................................................. 3
Scope of works..................................................................................................................................... 3
Survey objectives ................................................................................................................................. 3
2. SITE LOCATION AND WATER BODIES ................................................................................................. 4
3. PHASE 1 PLAN OF SURVEY SITE .......................................................................................................... 5
4. METHOD .................................................................................................................................................... 6
Desk study ........................................................................................................................................... 6
Survey .................................................................................................................................................. 6
Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 6
National Vegetation Classification (NVC) ............................................................................................ 7
Legislation and Planning Policy ........................................................................................................... 7
Survey Limitations ................................................................................................................................ 7
5. SURVEY RESULTS ................................................................................................................................... 8
Desk Study ........................................................................................................................................... 8
Vegetative Composition ....................................................................................................................... 8
6. SPECIES LIST ......................................................................................................................................... 13
7. PHOTOGRAPHS ..................................................................................................................................... 17
8. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................... 18
Evaluation .......................................................................................................................................... 18
Recommendations ............................................................................................................................. 18
9. REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................... 20
2
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
S.1 It is proposed to develop the Sykes Holt site into a microbrewery with visitor centre and associated
parking area. Under the current plans, the majority of the existing buildings will be removed and
some trees will be felled, in order to provide sufficient space for the construction of the brewery
building and for associated car parking. Definitive proposed plans for the site were not available at
the time of writing.
S.2 Throughout the wider site, it is understood that the majority of the woodland and the brook will be
retained and will remain unaffected.
S.3 Following the Ecological Appraisal survey in 2014 (Lloyd Bore, 2014), a botanical survey was
undertaken at Sykes Holt, comprising survey visits in May, June and August 2015.
S.4 The instructed works included a survey of the botanical species within the survey site, and an
assessment of the site for the presence or potential for protected or priority plant species.
S.5 Species were recorded and notes made of abundance and distribution, such that, where possible, a
comparison could be made to the National Vegetation Classification (NVC) (Rodwell, 1991).
S.6 The survey site is characterised by woodland, being the dominant habitat type. The habitat is most
comparable to NVC type W9 Fraxinus excelsior – Sorbus aucuparia – Mercurialis perennis
woodland, typical of that found in the Ribble Valley, and supports a variety of species with good
variation in structure throughout.
S.7 It is recommended that the woodland north of the stream and within area A is retained as part of the
objective to retain Ancient Semi-Natural Woodland, and that area B is retained to ensure retention of
the associated heterogeneity within the site.
S.8 The grassland habitats on site are typical, mesotrophic habitats and are not of any particular
conservation value, other than adding to the mosaic of habitats for wildlife within the site. Loss of the
grassland within the site is not considered to be of significance to floristic interest in the locality.
Nonetheless, retention of a proportion of the semi-improved grassland would ensure retention of the
floristic biodiversity within the site.
S.9 A number of recommendations have been made for the three main habitat types in the area
surveyed; woodland, grassland and the pond, to enhance and manage them for wildlife.
Author and Surveyor Verity Webster MSc BSc (Hons) CEcol MCIEEM
Checked By Lucy Gibson MSc BSc (Hons) MCIEEM
3
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
1. INTRODUCTION
INSTRUCTION
1.1. Lloyd Bore Ltd was instructed by Joanne Halton of Rural Solutions on the 12th February 2015 to
undertake a botanical survey of the site at Sykes Holt, Mellor Brook, BB2 7LB (SD 63621 31505).
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
1.2. It is proposed to develop the site into a microbrewery with visitors’ centre and associated parking.
1.3. Under the current plans, the majority of the existing buildings will be removed and some trees will be
felled to the south of the buildings, in order to provide sufficient space for the construction of the
brewery building and for associated car parking.
1.4. Throughout the wider site, it is understood that the majority of the woodland and the brook will be
retained and will remain unaffected. One shallow pond, within the southern area of woodland may be
removed. Definitive proposed plans for the site were not available at the time of writing.
SCOPE OF WORKS
1.5. The instructed works included a survey of the botanical species within the survey site, and an
assessment of the site for the presence or potential for protected or priority plant species.
1.6. A previous ecological appraisal was carried out in July 2014 (Lloyd Bore, 2014), which included a
habitat assessment on site in line with the JNCC Phase 1 Habitat Survey protocol.
SURVEY OBJECTIVES
1.7. The objectives of the botanical survey and report are to:-
• Identify protected or priority plant species;
• Identify areas that have potential for protected or priority plant species;
• Identify any invasive plant species on site; and
• Make general recommendations regarding avoidance and mitigation measures that might be
required to facilitate development.
4
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
2. SITE LOCATION
Fig. 1: Site location and site red line boundary. (Reproduced from by permission of Ordnance Survey. ©
Crown Copyright (2011), All rights reserved.)
5
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
3. PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY PLAN OF SURVEY SITE
Fig. 2: Phase 1 plan of proposed development site
6
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
4. METHOD
DESK STUDY
4.1. A data search was commissioned from the Lancashire Environmental Records Network for the
previous Ecological Appraisal (Lloyd Bore, 2014).
SURVEY
Site: Sykes Holt
Myerscough Smithy Road
Mellor Brook
Lancashire
Grid Reference: SD 636 314 (Centre of site)
Dates of Survey: 2 May 2015, 8 June 2015, 20 June 2015, 13 August, 26 August 2015
Surveyor: Verity Webster BSc (Hons) MSc CEcol MCIEEM
Purpose of Survey: To assess botanical interest
METHODOLOGY
4.2. Site visits were made throughout spring and summer 2015. Zones of impact (in relation to the
development proposals) were defined prior to the start of the survey. The areas of the site
considered to be ‘low impact’ or ‘unaffected’ by the proposals were not assessed in detail; with
reference to the site, this area is north of the stream (Mellor Brook).
4.3. The remainder of the site, considered to be of ‘medium’ or ‘high’ potential impact, was divided into
distinct habitat types. Each habitat type was walked at least twice through the survey period, in
different months. All higher plants were recorded to provide a description of the habitat type and to
capture all species present, as far as possible, throughout the season.
4.4. Species were recorded and notes made of abundance and distribution, such that, where possible, a
comparison could be made to the National Vegetation Classification (NVC) (Rodwell, 1991).
4.5. The NVC is a widely used methodology, providing a detailed, quantitative approach to botanical
survey. The NVC is, however, arguably deficient in community types, especially in areas such as
ecotones, or ruderal grassland, for which the percentage match to habitat type is often low.
4.6. The key to the NVC communities was used to define the community classification (Cooper, E. A,
JNCC, 1997).
4.7. All vegetation observed on site is included in the complete species list for the site (see section 6).
4.8. All specimens were identified to species level on site as far as possible. If it was not possible to
identify to species level on site, specimens were later identified with the use of a binocular
microscope.
7
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
NATIONAL VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION (NVC)
4.9. The NVC describes many different vegetation types in Britain, covering woodlands, heaths,
grasslands and mires. The classification is defined by the species from which it is composed. Each
habitat type has a designated code and name, such as W8 Fraxinus excelsior – Acer campestre –
Mercutialis perennis woodland. Each habitat type may also have several different sub-communities.
Some vegetational communities are widespread and common whilst others are restricted and rare.
4.10. These classifications are used to specify the habitats associated with habitat Biodiversity Action
Plans and those protected under Annex 1 of the Conservation (Natural Habitats, & c.) Regulations
1994.
LEGISLATION AND PLANNING POLICY
4.11. Under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, as amended by the Countryside and Rights of Way Act
2000, it is an offence, with certain exceptions, to intentionally pick, uproot or destroy any wild plant
listed in Schedule 8 of the Act, or if not an authorised person, to intentionally uproot any wild plant
not included in that Schedule.
4.12. A small number of the listed plants also receive protection under The Habitats and Species Directive
(92/43/EC) enacted through the Conservation of Habitats and Species (Amendment) Regulations
2012.
SURVEY LIMITATIONS
4.13. The survey of higher plants is seasonal. It is not always possible to record all species on site.
Species that flower during other months of the year may have been missed. Generally a botanical
survey during May, June and August will provide an opportunity to make a reasonably complete
assessment of the botany on the site.
4.14. The survey did not include lower plants, such as liverworts and bryophytes.
8
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
5. SURVEY RESULTS
DESK STUDY
5.1. A data search was commissioned from the Lancashire Environmental Records Network (LERN) for
the previous Ecological Appraisal. Please refer to section 6 of the original Ecological Appraisal report
for details of the records of botanical species included in the data provided by LERN (Lloyd Bore,
2014).
VEGETATIVE COMPOSITION
5.2. The botanical interests within the site can be categorised into the following habitats:
• Semi-natural woodland
• Ruderal / disturbed habitat
• Semi-improved grassland
• Improved, wet grassland.
5.3. The land at Sykes Holt supports mainly woodland, which is heterogeneous due to the varied
topography and distinction between the streamside environments and raised, dry ground. The
woodland to the north of the site, beyond Mellor Brook, which divides the site, is relatively
unmanaged, reflective of typical woodland in the Ribble Valley, whilst the area to the south of the
stream has seen more disturbance owing to use of the land for agricultural and residential purposes.
The farm buildings and paddocks are central to this southern sector of the site. The woodland south
of the buildings provides a protective buffer from the main road to the south, whilst that to the north
falls on the gradient to the stream.
5.4. The paddocks to the east of the buildings are open to the stream, with the grassland being typical of
pasture, but wet, most likely due to the fields retaining run-off, with pools of water collecting in flat
areas.
5.5. The eastern-most area of the site, an area of rough, open grassland, was previously highly managed,
most likely ploughed, and although much of it is flat, it has a high water table. The woodland around
this area, extending north of the stream to the east of the site, appears to be unmanaged, with the
steep slopes protecting the habitat from agricultural use.
5.6. The survey site has been divided into seven broad botanical areas, labelled A – G, described in more
detail below and annotated on Figure 3. Please also refer to the photographs of each area in section
7.
Woodland
5.7. The woodland on site, Mammon Wood, is reflective of native Lancashire woodlands; a mixture of
deciduous trees with oak (Quercus spp.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior). Within the wider landscape,
the survey site forms part of a wooded habitat corridor that follows Mellor Brook through Salmesbury,
south of the River Ribble.
5.8. The woodland north of the stream and within area A is designated Ancient Semi-Natural Woodland.
5.9. The trees that characterise the woodland as a whole, including the area north of the stream (which
was not surveyed in detail), are Oak (Quercus petraea and Q. robur) and ash with birch (Betula
pendula) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus).
9
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
5.10. The woodland ground flora is characterised by dog’s mercury (Mercurialis perennis), which provides
the dominant cover on the upper areas of the woodland south of the buildings and throughout the
dryer areas from the early spring through to the summer. Bluebell (Hyacinthoides non-scripta), is
conspicuous in April and May, although only prevalent on the upper, dryer areas of woodland, with
patches, in the early spring, of wood anemone (Anemone nemorosa) and lesser celandine
(Ranunculus ficaria) close to the paths. Ramsons (Allium ursinum) were conspicuous throughout the
woodland on the slopes to the stream in May and June creating a carpet of green, whilst at the edges
of the woodland near the tracks, the open ground supports herb Robert (Geranium robertianum) and
common mallow (Malus sylvestris). Cuckoo flower (Cardamine pratensis) was recorded along the
streamside and wet areas, along with hart’s-tongue fern (Asplenium scolopendrium), which gives the
woodland character all year. Ramsons and dog’s mercury are species that are indicative of heavy
clay soils, which are typical of woodlands within the Ribble valley.
5.11. Some mosses were prevalent in the woodland and typical of this habitat, including Hypnum
jutlandicum, Mnium hornum, and Kindbergia praelonga.
5.12. The woodland within the site is most comparable to NVC type W9 Fraxinus excelsior – Sorbus
aucuparia – Mercurialis perennis woodland, although it is not a strong match.
5.13. Within this general habitat, the structure and species’ composition of the woodland varies throughout
the site. The distinct areas are described below.
Area A
5.14. Numerous ash seedlings are present where light penetrates the canopy at the edges. South of the
stream in Area A, however, there are a few mature examples of horse chestnut (Aesculus
hippocastanum) that provide a dense canopy along the base of the stream to the upper reaches of
the slope where the land levels and accommodates the area supporting the buildings and access
tracks. Within this area there is a sparse understorey. This area has likely seen disturbance in the
past. There is evidence of this in the form of large rock piles supporting common nettle (Urtica
dioica).
5.15. The understorey trees, which are not dense, include holly (Ilex aquifolium), hawthorn (Crataegus
monogyna), elder (Sambucus nigra) and wild cherry (Prunus avium). There are occasional examples
of Rhododendron ponticum, the removal of which could form part of a woodland management plan.
Snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus) and laurel (Laurus nobilis), which are present close to the main
track provide evidence of previous planting.
Area B
5.16. Area B is dense, supporting a slightly more diverse mix of understorey, including hazel (Corylus
avellana) and holly). The woodland floor supports tufted hair-grass (Deschampsia caespitosa) with
bramble (Rubus fruticosus agg.). Pendulous sedge (Carex pendula) is prominent and abundant, a
species typical of wet clay soils. Lords and ladies (Arum maculatum) and patches of common nettle
are scattered throughout. The pond supports dense great horsetail (Equisetum telmateia).
10
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
Area C
5.17. The woodland around Area C close to the buildings is also quite dense, supporting oak, laurel, ash,
sycamore, hazel, wild cherry, and occasional elder, holly, hawthorn and goat willow (Salix caprea).
The ground flora here is dominated by dog’s mercury.
Site Boundaries of Area E
5.18. In the wooded area to the north and east of area E, wild cherry is common. Hawthorn dominates the
boundaries in this area, creating a dense hedgerow. Alder (Alnus glutinosa) is present along the
edge of the stream.
5.19. To the south of the field in Area E, on the boundary of the road and roundabout, ash, oak, birch and
willow trees have been planted.
Grassland
5.20. All the fields follow the same topography, sloping downwards to the north, towards the stream.
Area D
5.21. Area D, adjacent to the barns, is very similar to Area F, supporting semi-improved, mesotrophic,
herb-rich grassland.
5.22. The dominant grasses are rough meadow-grass (Poa trivialis) and Yorkshire fog (Holcus lanatus),
with abundant common bent-grass (Agrostis capillaris) and crested dog’s-tail (Cynosurus cristatus).
Frequent throughout the stand are sweet vernal-grass (Anthoxanthum odoratum) and meadow foxtail
(Alopecurus pratensis), both of which have a preference for neutral to alkaline soil. Tufted-hair grass
(Deschampsia cespitosa) is occasionally present in patches. Black bent-grass (Agrostis gigantia),
smooth meadow-grass (Poa pratensis) and rye grass (Lolium perenne) are rare and scattered.
Small herbs, frequent throughout, include meadow vetchling (Lathyrus pratensis), tufted vetch (Vicia
cracca), meadow buttercup (Ranunculus arvensis), cat’s-ear (Hypochaeris radicata) and common
mouse-ear (Cerastium fontanum). Less common are yarrow (Achillia millefolium) and white clover
(Trifolium repens).
5.23. Creeping thistle (Cirsium arvense) is occasional, with nutrient-enriched patches highlighted with
common nettle. Foxglove (Digitalis pupurea) is rare, present near the fencing. At the northern end,
where the ground slopes, there are tufts of compact rush (Juncus conglomeratus). Compact rush
and foxglove are typical of acid soils, reflecting an acid flush in the neutral grassland.
5.24. This habitat is most indicative of NVC classification MG9 Holcus lanatus - Deschampsia cespitosa
grassland with Poa trivilalis sub-community, a habitat which is characteristic of permanently moist
soils throughout the lowlands.
Area F
5.25. Area F, is similar to Area D, reflective of MG9 Holcus lanatus – Deschampsia cespitosa grassland,
but has a higher abundance of crested dog’s-tail and there are frequent patches of soft rush (Juncus
effusus).
11
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
5.26. At the southern end there is a wet depression supporting water mint (Mentha aquatica) and creeping
buttercup. Crested dog’s-tail is still dense in this area. Marsh thistle (Cirsium palustre) is rare
throughout.
Area G
5.27. Area G supports abundant Yorkshire fog with common bent-grass, rye grass (Lolium perenne), false
oat-grass (Arrhenatherum elatius) and cock’s-foot grass (Dactylus glomerata). Rough meadow-
grass and meadow foxtail are less frequent. Sweet vernal-grass is present in patches. Herbs are
present throughout, including cuckoo flower, selfheal (Prunella vulgaris), white clover, germander
speedwell (Veronica chamedrys), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus acris), field forget-me-not
(Myosotis arvensis), spear thistle (Cirsium vulgare), dandelion (Taraxacum agg.) and occasional
ragwort (Senecio jacobaea).
5.28. This grassland is a closer match to MG1 Arrenatherum elatius grassland.
Area E
5.29. Field E has been previously disturbed, most likely ploughed.
5.30. The field slopes gradually to the north, towards the stream, and there are steep slopes towards field
F, which is divided from field E by a line of mature trees.
5.31. Field E has a high water table, reflected most evidently in the abundance of reed canary-grass
(Phalaris arundinacea), which forms dense patches in the centre of the site. A wide band of
improved grassland around the site and weaving through the patches of reed canary-grass supports
rough grassland with tall herbs. There are frequent bundles of tufted vetch (Vicia cracca) and clumps
of soft rush. Bird’s-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), great willowherb (Epilobium hirsutum), common
nettle, creeping thistle and Russian comfrey (Symphytum officinale) are present. There are fewer
grass species in this area. False oat-grass is dominant, with creeping bent-grass (Agrtostis
stolonifera), Yorkshire fog, timothy (Phleum pratense), infrequent tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea)
and sweet vernal grass.
5.32. To the east of the site there are patches of colt’s-foot (Tussilago farfara) and the grass is shorter,
grazed by rabbits and trampled by dog-walkers. In this area species include white clover, ribwort
plantain (Plantago lanceolata), red clover (Trifolium pratense), cat’s-ear, and black medick (Medicago
lupulina). Hoary willowherb (Epilobium parviflorum) and great willowherb are frequent in patches and
can be found in the dense patches of reed canary grass as well as around the site boundaries.
5.33. Himalayan balsam (Impatiens glandulifera) is present to the north of the field, where the ground
slopes to the stream.
5.34. This habitat is most similar to MG9 Holcus lanatus – Deschampsia cespitosa grassland with
Arrhenatherum elatius community.
Ruderal / Disturbed Vegetation
5.35. On the edge of the woodland, near the buildings, Himalayan balsam is present along with greater
yellow archangel (Lamiastrum galeobdolon) (a garden escape), cleavers, herb Robert and bramble.
Ivy-leaved toadflax (Cymbalaria muralis) is present in the building walls and colonising cracks in the
ground. Perforate St Johns wort (Hypericum perforatum), nipplewort (Lapsanna communis), prickly
12
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
sow-thistle (Sonchus asper), false-oat grass, square-stalked willowherb (Epilobium tetragonum),
annual meadow-grass (Poa annua) and creeping soft-grass (Holcus mollis) comprise the grassland
adjacent to the buildings and paths. Adjacent to the woods, to the south of the buildings there is a
dense patch of rosebay willowherb (Chamerion angustifolium).
5.36. The well-trodden trackway between areas C and G supports species typical of used ground,
comprising daisy (Bellis perennis), common chickweed (Stellaria media), rough meadow-grass, white
clover, greater plantain (Plantago major) and procumbent pearlwort (Sagina procumbens).
Dandelion, selfheal (Prunella vulgaris), germander speedwell, square-stalked willowherb and wood
avens (Geum urbanum) are present along the track sides where the grassland is longer, with crested
dog’s-tail and smooth meadow-grass.
Fig. 3: Botanical areas – annotated according to area letters (see section 5)
A
D
F C
G B
E
13
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
6. SPECIES LIST
Species are divided into general habitat types, although they may not be unique to that habitat within
the site.
Species Latin name
Woodland
Ramsons Allium ursinum
Wood Anemone Anemone nemorosa
Lords and ladies Arum maculatum
Hart’s-tongue fern Asplenium scolopendrium
Black horehound Ballota nigra
False brome Brachypodium sylvaticum
Wood brome Bromus ramosus
Cuckoo flower Cardamine pratensis
Wood sedge Carex sylvatica
Pendulous sedge Carex pendula
Enchanters nightshade Circaea lutetiana
Tufted hair-grass Deschampsia cespitosa
Male fern Dryopteris felix-mas
Great horsetail Equisetum telmateia
Wood avens Geum urbanum
Ivy Hedera helix
Dog’s mercury Mercurialis perennis
Bluebell Hyacinthodies non-scripta
*Himalayan balsam Impatiens glandulifera
Lesser celandine Ranunculus ficaria
Bramble Rubus fruticosus
Dock species Rumex species
Bistort Persicaria bistorta
Hart’s-tongue fern Phyllitis scolopendrium
Sycamore Acer pseudoplatanus
14
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
Horse chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum
Alder Alnus glutinosa
Pendulous birch Betula pendula
Lawson’s cypress Chamaecyparis lawsoniana
Hazel Corylus avellana
Hawthorn Crataegus monogyna
Ash Fraxinus excelsior
Holly Ilex aquifolium
Laurel Laurus nobilis
Wild cherry Prunus avium
*Rhododendron Rhododendron ponticum
Raspberry Rubus idaeus
Goat willow Salix caprea
Elder Sambucus nigra
**Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus
Yew Taxa baccata
Elm Ulmus glabra
Sessile oak Quercus petraea
Pedunculate oak Quercus robur
Moss Hypnum jutlandicum
Moss Mnium hornum
Moss Kindbergia praelonga
Moss Isothecium myosuroides
Grassland
Yarrow Achillia millefolium
Common bent-grass Agrostis capillaris
Black bent-grass Agrostis gigantia
Creeping bent-grass Agrostis stolonifera.
Meadow foxtail Alopecurus pratensis
Sweet vernal-grass Anthoxanthum odoratum
Common mouse-ear Cerastium fontanum
Creeping thistle Cirsium arvense
15
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
Marsh thistle Cirsium palustre
Crested dog’s-tail Cynosurus cristatus
Tufted-hair grass Deschampsia cespitosa
Foxglove Digitalis purpurea
Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea
Yorkshire fog Holcus lanatus
Creeping soft-grass Holcus mollis
Cat’s-ear Hypochaeris radicata
Compact rush Juncus conglomeratus
Soft rush Juncus effusus
Meadow vetchling Lathyrus pratensis
Perennial rye-grass Lolium perenne
Common bird’s-foot trefoil Lotus corniculatus
Black medick Medicago lupulina
Water mint Mentha aquatica
Field forget-me-not Myosotis arvensis
Reed canary-grass Phalaris arundinacea
Timothy Phleum pratense
Ribwort plantain Plantago lanceolata
Rough meadow-grass Poa trivialis
Smooth meadow-grass Poa pratensis
Meadow buttercup Ranunculus arvensis
Russian comfrey Symphytum officinale
Red clover Trifolium pratense
White clover Trifolium repens
Colt’s-foot Tussilago farfara
Germander speedwell Veronica chamaedrys
Tufted vetch Vicia cracca
Ruderal
Creeping bent-grass Agrostis stolonifera
False oat-grass Arrhenatherum elatius
Daisy Bellis perennis
False brome Brachypodium sylvaticum
16
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
Wavy bittercress Cardamine flexuosa
Rosebay willowherb Chamerion angustifolium
Creeping thistle Cirsium arvense
Spear thistle Cirsium vulgare
Ivy-leaved toadflax Cymbalaria muralis
Great willowherb Epilobium hirsutum
Hoary willowherb Epilobium parviflorum
Square-stalked willowherb Epilobium tetragonum
Cleavers Galium aperine
Herb Robert Geranium robertianum
Creeping soft-grass Holcus mollis
Perforate St Johns wort Hypericum perforatum
Himalayan balsam Impatiens glandulifera
Nipplewort Lapsanna communis
Greater yellow-archangel Lamiastrum galeobdolon
Common mallow Malva sylvestris
Red bartsia Odontites verna
Greater plantain Plantago major
Annual meadow-grass Poa annua
Rough meadow-grass Poa trivialis
Selfheal Prunella vulgaris
Creeping buttercup Ranunculus acris
Procumbent pearlwort Sagina procumbens
Common Ragwort Senecio jacobaea
Prickly sow-thistle Sonchus asper
Common chickweed Stellaria media
Dandelion Taraxacum agg
White clover Trifolium repens
Common nettle Urtica dioica
* Schedule 9 non-native invasive species
** Non-designated non-native species
17
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
7. PHOTOGRAPHS
Photograph 1: Area A (12/06/14) Photograph 2: Area B (12/06/14)
Photograph 3: Area C (12/06/15) Photograph 2: Area D (07/05/15)
Photograph 5: Area E (16/04/15) Photograph 6: Area F (05/06/15)
Photograph 5: Area G (12/06/15) Photograph 6: Pond in Area B (12/06/14)
18
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
8. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
EVALUATION
8.1. The survey site is characterised by woodland, being the dominant habitat type. The habitat is most
comparable to NVC type W9 Fraxinus excelsior – Sorbus aucuparia – Mercurialis perennis
woodland, typical of that found in the Ribble Valley, and supports a variety of species with good
variation in structure throughout.
8.2. The woodland within the site forms part of a habitat corridor of woodland along Mellor Brook, a
feature which should be retained at a landscape level. In addition, lowland mixed deciduous
woodland is a Section 41 Habitat of Principal Importance (NERC, 2006), whilst broadleaved and
mixed woodland is a Priority Habitat under the Lancashire Biodiversity Action Plan.
8.3. The aims and objectives of the Lancashire Biodiversity Action Plan for broadleaved and mixed
woodland include retention of Ancient Semi-Natural Woodland.
8.4. It is recommended that the woodland north of the stream and within area A is retained as part of the
objective to retain Ancient Semi-Natural Woodland, and that area B is retained to ensure retention of
the associated heterogeneity within the site.
8.5. The grassland habitats on site are typical, mesotrophic habitats and are not of any particular
conservation value, other than adding to the mosaic of habitats for wildlife within the site. Loss of the
grassland within the site is not considered to be of significance to floristic interest in the locality.
Nonetheless, retention of a proportion of the semi-improved grassland would ensure retention of the
floristic biodiversity within the site.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Woodland
8.6. Protection of the woodland north of the stream and within area A is proposed to ensure retention of
the existing extent of Ancient Semi-Natural Woodland.
8.7. It is considered that the retention of the woodland comprising area B would ensure retention of the
highest diversity and variation of woodland types within the site, whilst still allowing use of the land.
8.8. Retention of the tree belt between areas F and are E would allow retention of some habitat
connectivity between the woodland to the north and the small, isolated plot that comprises area B,
albeit discontinuous.
8.9. Removal of Rhododendron ponticum, which is present within the wooded areas south of the stream
would be beneficial, thereby encouraging establishment of native understorey shrubs.
8.10. The Himalayan balsam should be controlled, whilst it is still manageable. This plant has not yet
become abundant and dominant along the streamside to the west of the site, although it is becoming
so to the east, north of area E. Management techniques available include cutting of the plant prior to
it setting seed and still in flower. This would require a long-term management regime.
19
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
Grassland
8.11. The grassland habitats are not considered to be of high ecological value, although the retention of a
mosaic of habitat types within the site would be beneficial for biodiversity in general.
8.12. It would make logistical sense to retain the sloped areas of grassland in fields D, F and/or E, to
maintain the wet-flushed grassland character. However, suitable precautions would be required to
prevent run off of any enrichment or pollutants into the stream to the north from any development.
8.13. Management regimes for the grassland could be implemented to improve species diversity. This
would include cyclic, annual cutting regimes (main cut in autumn), removal of arisings and retention
of areas of longer, less frequently cut grassland.
8.14. Development around the site boundaries of scrub habitat would be beneficial for wildlife.
The Pond
8.15. Waterbodies are valuable to wildlife including amphibians (such as newts) and invertebrates (such as
dragonflies).
8.16. The pond in area B is currently shallow and choked with great horsetail. This feature could be
significantly enhanced for wildlife.
8.17. Clearance (dredging) of the pond in winter and disposal of vegetation (great horsetail) would allow
colonisation of other plant species (some could be planted). Following dredging, deepening of the
pond with variation in levels and ‘shelves’ at the margins, would provide more favourable habitat for a
variety of aquatic wildlife.
20
C410-RP04 | BOTANICAL SURVEY REPORT
SYKES HOLT, MELLOR BROOK STATUS: PLANNING
17 DECEMBER 2015
9. REFERENCES
Cooper, E.A., (1998), Summary descriptions of National Vegetation Classification grassland and
montane communities, 92 pages A4 softback, ISBN 1 86107 443 3
IEEM (2006). Guidelines for ecological impact assessment in the United Kingdom. Institute of
Ecology and Environmental Management, Winchester.
Lloyd Bore Ltd (2014) C410-RP01: Ecological Appraisal – Sykes Holt, Mellor Brook. Maude St,
Kendal
Rodwell, J.S, (2006), NVC Users' Handbook, 68 pages, ISBN 978 1 86107 574 1