Transcript
  • An update on Lygodium microphyllum biological control

    Heartland CISMA 25 February 2015 Melissa C. Smith

    Ellen C. Lake Phillip Tipping

    USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Lab Fort Lauderdale, Florida

  • Lygodium microphyllum in South Florida…and beyond

  • Lygodium in Conservation Areas

    Flatford Swamp Greenswamp Wilderness Preserve

    A.R.M. Loxahatchee NWR

    Everglades National Park

  • Propagule pressure:

    • Each sorus has ~ 215 spores • Each fertile leaflet has ~ 133 sori • 215 X 133 = 28,500 spores per

    fertile leaflet (Volin et al. 2004)

    Sori

    L. microphyllum reproduction

  • Lygodium biological control: Moths that were, moths that are, and some moths that have not yet come to pass (and a mite)

    Austromusotima camptozonale

    Neomusotima conspurcatalis

    Lygomusotima stria

  • Neomusotima releases 2008 - 2009

    PresenterPresentation NotesMany of these releases are in the same locations as the Austromusotima, or white Lygodium mite that failed to establish in the field.

  • Neomusotima range 2012 - 2014

  • Neomusotima in the field

  • Neomusotima in the field

  • Neomusotima research

    Feeding preference • Do N. conspurcatalis

    larvae preferentially feed on fertile fronds?

    • Effects of fertile frond feeding on spore germination

    • Effects of fertile frond feeding on larval development time

  • Neomusotima research

    Feeding preference • 1st and 2nd Instar

    Larvae preferentially feed on fertile fronds in choice tests (p

  • Choice Feeding Trial

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile

    A A B B C C D D E E

    Cm2 c

    onsu

    med

    per

    indi

    vidu

    al

    Leaf

    Fertile Sterile

    a*

    b*

    a*

    b*

  • No-Choice Feeding Trail

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile Fertile Sterile

    A A B B C C D D E E

    Cm2

    cons

    umed

    per

    indi

    vidu

    al

    Leaf

    Fertile Sterile

    a*

    b*

    a*

    b*

  • Oviposition Preference Trial

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Fertile Sterile

    Larv

    ae p

    rodu

    ced

    per f

    emal

    e

    Leaf Type

    a*

    b*

  • Neomusotima research

    Spore germination • Passage through the

    gut of the caterpillar only resulted in 2 prothalli

  • Neomusotima research

    Development time • Fertile frond feeding

    did not significantly affect larval development time or successful emergence to adult.

    • Did not measure “downstream” effects in adults or larval size.

  • Integrated weed management

    • Control • Neomusotima only • Herbicide only • Neomusotima and

    herbicide

  • Floracarus perrepae (Eriophyidae)

    Freeman et al. 2005

    • Transfers of galled material 2008 – 2010 • Very low establishment success measured in

    2011 • Thought to be haplotype specific? • Does wet or dry season release timing

    determine establishment?

  • F. perrepae damage

    • Australia: Goolsby et al. (2004)

    • Reduced aboveground biomass by 49%

    • Reduced belowground biomass by 35%

    • In Florida: • Reduction of formation

    of fertile fronds? • Are mite and moth

    damage synergistic?

  • F. perrepae releases 2008

  • F. perrepae range 2015

  • Lygodium and CERP

    • 300,000 N. conspurcatalis released since Q1 2014

    • 60,000 F. perrepae released since Q1 2014

    • Mass rearing and release of N. conspurcatalis and F. perrepae

    • Follow up to determine “success” (establishment, impact, dispersal)

    • Priorities given to natural areas

  • Future directions • Collaboration with CSIRO Australia to

    investigate apparent haplotype mismatch • Determine the relative impacts of the moth

    alone, the mite alone, and the two together • Build occupancy models to predict “patches”

    where moths could occupy and focus releases

  • Acknowledgments

    Southwest FloridaWater Management District

    An update on Lygodium microphyllum biological controlLygodium microphyllum in South Florida…and beyondLygodium in Conservation AreasL. microphyllum reproductionLygodium biological control:Neomusotima releases 2008 - 2009Neomusotima range 2012 - 2014Neomusotima in the fieldNeomusotima in the fieldNeomusotima researchNeomusotima researchChoice Feeding TrialNo-Choice Feeding TrailOviposition Preference TrialNeomusotima researchNeomusotima researchIntegrated weed managementFloracarus perrepae (Eriophyidae)�F. perrepae damageSlide Number 20F. perrepae range 2015Lygodium and CERP Future directionsAcknowledgments


Top Related