Download - Amherst-Handout MP - UMass
4/18/12
1
Formal Approaches to Heritage Languages April 21-22, 2012 University of Massachusetts Amherst
Maria Polinsky Harvard University
1
Heritage languages bear significant resemblance to the languages from which they were formed (the baseline) They tend to amplify certain trends that are
already present in these languages
2
Heritage languages deviate from the baseline in a number of ways Contrary to expectations, they do not look
enough like the baseline Heritage languages bear significant
resemblance to each other They deviate from the baseline in similar ways
which call for a principled explanation
3
While there are some parallels between structures/forms in the heritage language and in the dominant language, such parallels are not exhaustive What prevents heritage languages from
transferring all they need from the dominant language?
4
4/18/12
2
Viewpoint A: Learning about heritage languages Arriving at a comprehensive description of
heritage languages, understanding their structure, processing, and origins
Viewpoint B: Learning from heritage languages Using heritage languages as a new source of
data feeding into theory construction
5
New material for understanding language in time and space
− Language origins
− Language
acquisition
Better theory of acquisition, development, and evolution
6
The Bickerton Quadriga
Adult heritage languages Definitely a more accessible source than
members of the Quadriga Allow researchers to collect data and conduct
experiments on a much broader basis
7
New angle on the core of human language capacity Hence, new window on Universal Grammar
8
4/18/12
3
New data for testing our theories of language structure and language processing
− Language
universals
− Language structure
Better theory of language
9
Agreement (phi-features) Case licensing
10
Well-established: [person] [number] [gender]
11
Well-established: [person] [number] [gender]
Somewhat more tentative: [status] (honorification) [wh-agreement]
12
4/18/12
4
Person agreement never/rarely appears on adjectives
Probing for [person] and [number]/[gender] occurs in separate derivation steps (Anagnostopoulou 2003, Béjar 2003,
Chomsky 2000, Laka 1993, Shlonsky 1989, Sigurdsson 1996, Taraldsen 1995, a.o.)
13
Person agreement never/rarely appears on adjectives
Probing for [person] and [number]/[gender] occurs in separate derivation steps (Anagnostopoulou 2003, Béjar 2003,
Chomsky 2000, Laka 1993, Shlonsky 1989, Sigurdsson 1996, Taraldsen 1995, a.o.)
[person] is probed first 14
Phi features are internally structured in a hierarchical way (Harley & Ritter 2002, McGinnis 2005, Béjar &
Rezac 2009, Coon & Preminger 2010; Preminger 2011)
15
Person > number/gender
Production: various errors, often with the default person and number/gender
Comprehension: greater sensitivity to person mismatches than to number or gender mismatches
16
4/18/12
5
Auditory experiment evaluating sensitivity to gender, number, or person mismatch in the verbal paradigm
Rating task (1-7 scale), subject and verb separated by two words; all verbs stem-stressed (to minimize cuing) Too bad that she quite often think… 24 subjects (avg. age 26), intermediate
proficiency 17
The asymmetry is confirmed: person > number > gender
If person is probed first, the failure of probing on other features may be accounted for by the need for a truncated structure
Possible mechanism: shallow structure building, with only closest nodes accessed?
18
ClassP
[ ] NumP
[ ] πP
[ ] …
… …
Subject
…
19
X X
Unexpected: gender is different from number
Two possibilities: Number is probed earlier than gender, and the
hierarchy needs to be more fine-grained Number and gender are still equal as phi-
features but the computation of number is determined situationally ▪ the computation of gender requires going back to
the lemma, which imposes extra processing costs
20
4/18/12
6
Within HLs: optimize processing conditions for heritage
speakers to see if the contrast disappears in comprehension
make comparison conditions for controls more difficult
21
Outside HLs: look for evidence that gender and number probe sequentially
A possible candidate: Highest conjunct agreement (HCA), as in Arabic or Hindi (Aoun et al. 1999, 2004; Benmamoun et al. 2009, Bhatt & Walkow 2012; Polinsky 2012)
22
Agreement marking on a probe depends on the properties of only one conjunct, structurally or linearly the closest one (HCA) Also known as single conjunct or partial
agreement In contrast with full or resolved agreement
(RA): agreement marking on the probe results from the computation over the properties of all the conjuncts
23
VS order: ✓HCA ža Omar w Karim
Moroccan came.3MSg Omar and Karim
Arabic ‘Omar and Karim came’
SV order: ✓RA Omar w Karim žaw Omar and Karim came.3PL ‘Omar and Karim came’
24
4/18/12
7
VS order: ✓RA žaw Omar w Karim came.3PL Omar and Karim ‘Omar and Karim came’
SV order: *HCA *Omar w Karim ža Omar and Karim came.3MSg
25
Resolved Agreement
Highest Conjunct Agreement
Subject before verb (SV)
Yes No
Subject after verb (VS)
Yes Yes
26
[number] probes for the highest target, the coordinate DP inactivating it (cf. Rackowski & Richards 2005)
The next probe, [gender], then targets the highest remaining target:
in this case, the DP in [Spec,&P].
27
Unexpected: gender is different from number
Two possibilities: Number is probed earlier than gender, and the
hierarchy needs to be more fine-grained Number and gender are still equal as phi-
features but the computation of number is determined situationally
28
4/18/12
8
HL hierarchy of phi features: person > number > gender
Implications for the existing hierarchies: class (gender) is not on the same level as number
29
Structural case: assigned in a certain structural configuration
Inherent case: assigned depending on theta-marking
Lexical case: assigned based on an idiosyncratic property of the assigning head
30
Baseline Structural cases:
NOM (unmarked), ACC
Inherent cases: Assigned by a verbal
head: DAT Assigned by a nominal
head: GEN Assigned by a P head:
INSTR, LOC
Heritage, production Structural cases: null
forms Inherent cases:
DAT ACC Cases assigned by non-
verbal heads: null forms, confusion of oblique cases (noisy production)
31
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
NOM ACC DAT exp DAT goal GEN
% C
orre
ct
suppliance omission overgeneralization
82 subjects avg. age 21
32
4/18/12
9
Baseline Structural cases:
NOM (unmarked), ACC
Inherent cases: Assigned by a verbal
head: DAT Assigned by a nominal
head: GEN Assigned by a P head:
INSTR, LOC
Heritage, comprehension
Structural cases: high tolerance of null forms
Inherent cases: DAT and ACC both
accepted Cases assigned by non-
verbal heads: low tolerance of null forms
33 34 36 subjects, avg age 18;6
Production Comprehension
Attrition?
Structural case
Replaced by an unmarked form or a frequent form, many errors
Mismatches tolerated
Yes
Inherent case Maintained as in the baseline or replaced by another marked case
Mismatches not tolerated
No
Lexical case Replaced by a more regular form
Mismatches ignored
May vary depending on lexical item
35
Structural case gets replaced/attrited, inherent case is retained
Both production and comprehension are necessary to evaluate case in HLs inherent cases assigned by P and N were truly
testable only in comprehension
36
4/18/12
10
Applying these generalizations to case configurations where primary data have not resulted in a conclusive analysis
37
Most agree: assigned in spec, vP Disagreement concerning the licensing of
ERG: Inherent case (Woolford 2000, 2006, a.o.)
Structural case (Bobaljik & Branigan 2006, a.o.)
38
Heritage Hindi: High rate of omission of the ergative postposition
–ne and replacement by null form in production (G. Mahajan 2009, Montrul et al. 2012)
Heritage Hindi: Inappropriate ergative receives high ratings
(Montrul et al. 2012)
ERG is treated as a structural case 39
ERG undergoes significant attrition, symptomatic of structural case
GEN and DAT are regularized but well preserved, symptomatic of inherent case
40
4/18/12
11
Avar: Nakh-Dagestanian (NE Caucasian) language One of the largest in Dagestan (about 750K speakers) A large number of speakers are bilingual in Russian
and Avar Core cases: ABS, ERG, DAT, GEN (and many
locatives), agglutinative marking
ABS ERG DAT GEN LOC1 was was:-as was:-as-
ul was:-as-e was:-as-
da
was ‘son, boy’
41 42
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
ABS ERG
Mill
isec
onds
Controls Heritage
42 controls, 18 HL speakers
*
Production: relatively low error rate Ergative replaced by the absolutive and dative Dative is replaced by the absolutive and
ergative No case omission
Morphological leveling of case allophones (N=5 speakers, video clip story)
43
Most agree: assigned in spec, vP Disagreement concerning the licensing of
ERG: Inherent case (Woolford 2000, 2006, a.o.) Structural case (Bobaljik & Branigan 2006,
a.o.) Solution:
Two different ergatives, structural in some languages, inherent in others
44
4/18/12
12
Differential properties of the ergatives across HLs Some languages have structural ergative
(Hindi, Dyirbal) Other languages have inherent ergative (Avar)
Next question, addressed to theorists: what parametric properties are correlated with the two different ergatives?
45
Heritage languages are a valuable source of data that feed back into linguistic theory
We need to learn how to mine this source
46
47
Four- way comparison: HL adults HL children Monolingual adults Monolingual children
This allows us to separate attrition from incomplete acquisition
48
4/18/12
13
Do child learners (future heritage speakers) and adult heritage speakers have the same morphosyntactic deficits? If a child and an adult deviate from the
baseline in the same way, the feature has not been acquired
If a child and an adult perform differently, the feature has been acquired but lost/reanalyzed
49
Adult heritage language = fossilized child language, with the level of fossilization roughly corresponding to the age of interruption?
50
Feminine: cerkov’ ‘church’, tetrad’ ‘notebook’, krovat’ ‘bed’, sol’ ‘salt’, ten’ ‘shadow’
Masculine: put’ ‘way’, dožd’ ‘rain’, portfel’ ‘briefcase’, kalendar’ ‘calendar’
Standard child language error: feminine nouns are interpreted as masculine,
up to age 7;0 (Gvozdev 1961) independent of frequency
51
Gender of feminine nouns in palatal consonant is acquired late and poses a problem for monolingual and heritage children alike
This incompletely acquired feature then persists in HL adults
52
4/18/12
14
Adult incomplete grammar undergoes attrition and is different from the “initial state” represented by heritage child grammar
53
Acquired early (2;0-2;6) Universal preference for subject relatives Error rate (wrong head choice), ages 4-6:
English : 10%-13% (multiple studies) Indonesian: 11% (Tjung 2006) Mandarin Chinese: 3.9% (Hsu et al. 2006,
2009) Turkish: 4% (Slobin 1985) Russian: 3.7%-4.2% (Fedorova 2005, Polinsky
2008, 2011)
54
55 Adults (C/H): 17/21, age 24; children (C/H): 6/23, age 7
HL children perform on par with age-matched monolingual controls and significantly outperform HL adults
The syntax of relative clauses undergoes a reanalysis across the lifespan and presents a case of attrition
56
4/18/12
15
Same HL with a different dominant language: minimize the effect of transfer
Structuring the tests in such a way that we could go against the transfer (Russian relative clauses, Polinsky 2011)
57
Distinguish heritage speakers from heritage language learners
So far, no direct comparison between heritage speakers “in the wild” and HL re-learners Many subjects of HL studies are drawn from
HL classes (a self-selected group)
58
10 English-speaking learners of German in Switzerland 16.5 – 18 years old (mean 17.5)
Tested After three weeks (following an introductory
course) Five months later
Test performance correlated with increase in gray matter density
59
Increase in gray matter density over five months correlated positively with difference in proficiency (measured by improved test scores) in Left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) Left anterior temporal lobe (ATL)
60
4/18/12
16
61 62
Gray matter density in language-related areas increases in as little as five months of instruction in country (even with a huge dialect difference)
This increase correlates with the amount learned
This again suggests brain growth stimulated by effective interaction with the second language
63
Even a small amount of input in the target language changes its neurological representation and may also have behavioral consequences
By focusing on HL learners we do not always tap into the depths of language attrition/incomplete acquisition
64
4/18/12
17
Production can be used for preliminary data mining
In assessing production, aim for a controlled setting Video descriptions Maps Sentence completion Elicited imitation
65
He wante- he go- he took from zeh garbage a cigarette, and, and zen he saw zeh police, said hello, and zen he, just, em, just, frew zeh garbage can- can, zen, eh, zeh rabbit, em, how it’s called…flowered his flowers, and zen he wanted to eat him, so he took a rope and went up, an- and zeh rabbit saw him, and he was wif scissors, so he cut ze- cut zeh rope, and zen he fell into zeh police…’s car. (So how did he notice the rabbit in the first place?) Because eh, zeh rabbit wan- eh, wer- because he flowered zeh, his flowers, uh, one, on- two drops went on him. (So where did the drops go?) One on his cigarette, and zeh, zeh fire, eh…not burned…blew out? And one on his nose.
66
Speaker describes a map to a confederate who moves objects on the screen (Gómez Gallo et al. 2007)
Speakers produce spontaneous instructions to the confederate
Confederate does not give verbal feedback
67
Mandarin Chinese, baseline: Beijing dialect 13 native speakers and 17 heritage
speakers of advanced proficiency in spoken Mandarin However, five HL speakers do not have the
knowledge of formal registers
68
4/18/12
18
Basic word order is SVO, but attributes including relative clauses precede the head noun
Nouns occur with classifiers Use of numerals with nouns is associated
with indefiniteness Locative expressions: in most cases, locative
PPs appear before the VP Serial verbs are widely used, and some
serialization correlates with the presence of the ba-construction 69
Proxy: noun filling the gap after the relative clause when the real head precedes the relative clause. For instance:
把 小 三角形 [RC角上 有 圆点的] 图形 移 到 北京
ba small triangle corner have ball de figure move to Beijing REAL HEAD RELATIVE CLAUSE PROXY
‘Move the small triangle with a ball on its corner to Beijing.’
70
In Mandarin, numeral phrases include numerals and classifiers:
一 个 三角形 ‘a triangle’ yi ge sanjiaoxing NUM CLF NOUN
Generally, numeral phrases are considered indefinite
In our corpus, native controls used numerals less, esp. when the theme expression had modifiers (hence, was more likely to be definite)
Heritage speakers show lack of awareness of this subtle semantic feature
72
4/18/12
19
Controls use the ba-construction, which is problematic for heritage speakers
Controls use prenominal relative clauses, heritage speakers use postnominal relatives
74
Relative clauses (RC) precede the head noun
Most native speakers strictly follow this rule
[RC角上 有 菱形 的 小] [Head Noun 正方形] corner has a diamond ADN small
square ‘a small square that has a diamond at its corner’
75
Heritage speakers tend to put the relative clause after the head noun
在 北京,放一个大的三角形 边上 有一个点的 In Beijing, put a big triangle the hypotenuse has a dot ADN In Beijing, put a big triangle that has a dot on its hypotenuse
Possible reasons: Late planning in production, due to the overall
complexity of the theme description Interference from English
76
4/18/12
20
Native speakers Heritage speakers
Proxy construction Yes No
Numerals Less likely More likely
Word order 1) ba-construction 2) Attributes before
head noun
1) Rigid SVO 2) Attributes after
head noun Verb complexity Verb compound Single verb
The Fruit Cart experimental design is an effective method if eliciting production form heritage speakers in such a way that their output is well constrained
78
Allows researchers to focus on the areas that may cause difficulty
Borrow from the playbook of other fields: L1, L2, clinical populations, fieldwork experiments Types of phenomena Methodologies
79
Grammaticality Judgment Tasks (GJTs) Points of general concern:
What is the exact nature of grammaticality? Dichotomous or gradient? What is the role of extragrammatical factors?
Point of methodological concern: Absence of rigorous control techniques
An additional worry: Heritage speakers show a notoriously high rate of
null responses on GJT (Polinsky 2006) 80
4/18/12
21
Avoiding GJT (Schütze 1996, Tremblay 2005)
Alternatives: Response time Rating or magnitude estimation Eye tracking (Irina Sekerina’s work)
81
Optimize the comprehension conditions for heritage speakers Allows us to make sure we are not dealing
with bottleneck effects Speed/add distractions to comprehension
conditions for the controls
82
Self-paced reading (SPR), an established tool
(Just et al. 1982, Mitchell 2004) Timing is regular except for areas of
difficulty Problem: HL speakers have difficulty
reading, even if the alphabet is the same How can one extend the SPR paradigm to
populations that do not read? 83
Taking lessons from researchers for whom reading is irrelevant, inappropriate, or an unwelcome confound Sign language research Child language acquisition research Research on clinical populations Phonological investigations
84
4/18/12
22
Sentence-picture matching (SPM), also well-established (Bamber 1969, Carey & Lockhart 1973, Clark
& Chase 1972, Frost 1972, Seymour 1974, Shepard 1967, a.o.)
Present acoustic stimuli and record response time for a stimulus-to-picture matching task
Common in the fields of aphasiology and child language acquisition
85
An unknown: Do SPR and SPM produce comparable results?
Test case: Relative clause processing
86
Subject relatives are easier to process (SPR: Traxler et al. 2002; ERP: King & Kutas
1995; PET: Stromswold et al. 1996; fMRI: Just et al. 1996; Eye-tracking: Traxler et al. 2002…)
Cross-linguistic advantage of subject relatives (Dutch: Frazier 1987; German: Mecklinger et
al. 1995; Hebrew: Arnon 2005; Japanese: Miyamoto & Nakamura 2003; Korean: Kwon et al. 2006; Russian: Polinsky 2011…)
87
Subject preference in the processing of relative clauses in Russian (Levy et al. 2007, submitted; Polinsky 2011, 2012)
Subject and object RCs can have the same word order
NPi [whichNOM __i Verb NPACC] = Subject Relative
NPi [whichACC __i Verb NPNOM] = Object Relative
88
4/18/12
23
Tim
e in
m
s
Subject Object
Polinsky 2012; Polinsky & Fedorova in prep.
*
89
Subjects see two pictures on computer screen followed by a sound file
90
Tim
e in
m
s
Subject Object
*
Polinsky & Fedorova in prep. 91
Heritage studies can re-appropriate well-established paradigms from other experimental fields Picture matching in lieu of SPR Possible use of self-paced listening, also used
in L1 and L2 research (Marinis 2003)
92
4/18/12
24
Heritage studies can re-appropriate well-established paradigms from other experimental fields
Using visual world paradigms in general will provide rich results: more need for eye-tracking in HL studies
93
From behavior to brain From modules to interfaces From homogenous sub-populations to
assessing variance
94
ERP measures: brain/behavior dissociations
Grammar University students learning Spanish for
the first time
95
Violations of tense (similar to English) Su abuela *cocinando/cocina muy bien His grandmother *cooking / cooks very well
Violations of gender (no parallel in English) Ellos fueron a *un/una fiesta They went to a party
Violations of number (English has it, but not here) *El/los niños están jugando The boys are playing
96
4/18/12
25
97 98
99
University students again showed a brain/behavior dissociation: Their acceptability judgment responses were
at chance But their brain responses reliably differentiated
grammatical from ungrammatical sentences In this respect, their brain responses
looked like those of native speakers
100
4/18/12
26
NPIs are licensed by negation and negative-like contexts Nobody expects Congress to ever change. Voters expect Congress to ever change. Few people expect Congress to ever change. Voters doubt that Congress will ever change.
But negation can’t be just anywhere, it must be structurally higher than the NPI *The people [rel. cl. who can’t stand it] expect
Congress to ever change.
101
No bills [that the democratic senators supported] will ever become law.
*The bills [that the democratic senators supported] will ever become law.
*The bills [that no democratic senators supported] will ever become law.
(German: Drenhaus et al. 2005; English: Xiang et al, 2009)
102
U of Chicago undergraduates tested in Autism-spectrum Quotient (AQ) Focus on communication subscale (known to
correlate negatively with pragmatic comprehension)
Lower score better pragmatic inferencing NPI Illusions: Lower AQ score ( pragmatic
skills) – more illusions Agreement Illusions: no correlation with AQ
score
103
Autism-spectrum Quotient (AQ) can be used on healthy HL populations to separate the syntax-semantics or syntax-pragmatics interface from purely grammatical phenomena
104
4/18/12
27
Extreme variation with regard to proficiency in heritage speakers C.f. three-stage model (Polinsky & Kagan 2007) (i) Acrolectal HS: high proficient, near-native
speakers of Russian, maximally close to competent monoling
(ii) Mesolectal HS: clear deficencies if compared to monolingual
(iii) Basilectal HS: lowest-proficiency speaker, maximally removed from native attainment, may have never acquired literacy in Russian
105
Rate of speech (measured in words per minute) may serve as a predictor of heritage speakers’ overall language proficiency
Advantages: Does not rely on literacy skills A very simple measure
Disadvantages: More proof of the concept needed Unclear what RoS actually reflects
106