Download - Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
1/15
Management of Agricultural
Waste and potential for co-benefits
ang an
Nguyen Hong Thanh
n s ry o gr cu ura an rura eve opmen
Haiphong, July 2010
. urren s a us oagricultural wastemana ement in
Vietnam2. Agricultural waste
managemenpolicies
-. benefit fromagricultural wastemanagement
4. Recommendation
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
2/15
GDP (gross domestic
production) 22,09 % (2008),20 % (2009)
About 70 percent of thepopulation live in rural villages
agriculture
Total rice area was about 7,3million ha, and rice productionwas about 38,7 million tons,estimated in 2009 is about 39,2
million tons.
Vietnam is one of the topcountries export rice in the
rop res ue agricultural wastes - after harvesting rice straw,
, , ,cassava stem, coconut shell and leaves, etc,
a ro-industrial residues i.e. residues that areresulted from following processing on rice husks,biogases, cassava peels, peanut shells, coffee
,
Hazardous wastes: excess fertilizers and
Animals wastes
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
3/15
Current status and problems
of utilization of Crop residues
rop res ue s over
million tons per year
Organic source byburning and burying
Cattle feed
Animal-pen padding
Mushroomproduction
oo ng
Utensil making
Current status and problems of
utilization of Crop residues
The comprehensive utilization rate ofcrop residue is rather low, a large Sources Million tons
num er o em was a an one orunreasonably usedPaddy straw 61.9
Rice husk 5.6
Environmental issues: water pollution,air pollution, global warming, negative
Maize husk 4.8
Cassava
stem
0.6
effects to human health Cane trash 1.5Bagasse 5.0
Peanut shells 0.1
Easily causing fires, traffic accidents,
effecting the road traffic safety Peanutleaves 5.7
Coffee husk 0.3.
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
4/15
The management practice model of crop
residues
Feed utilization
silageBio-gas
production
Straw
cro a s orage
Feed directlyStraw power
GasificationResourceUtilization
esourc Fertilizer utilization
Bio-charReturning to field
directly
s
Direct burning
Industrial rawRaw materials of
e urn ng ofield indirectly
Cultivation ofedible fungi
materials
Buildingmaterials
Ways of utilization of straws resourcesWays of utilization of straws resources
In general, enterprises have concerned about wastemanagement, however, investment level in
sources. At present, there are 114 factories has usedclean technolo and 16 enter rises have built andapplied ISO 14001
Mostly waste from processing in traditional villages isreason of environmental pollution
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
5/15
Hazardous pesticide and
fertilizer management
s ng o pes c e an er zer as een ncreas ng rap y.
1986 1990: 13.000 15.000 ton/year pesticide, averageused 0, 4-0,5 kg ai / ha
1991 2000: 20.000 30.000 ton/year pesticide, averageused 0,67-1,0 kg ai/ha
U to now: 33.000 to 75.000 tons/ ear
Over 90 per cent of pesticides sprayed were insecticides. Of thepesticides used, nearly 20 percent are classified by the World
.
in whole country, there are 69.237,236 kg and 43.574,179 litpesticides need to be treated and 69.640,282 kg of chemical
,
there are no particularly regulations on collecting packages ofpesticides.
Hazardous pesticide and
fertilizer management
Average using of fertilizer is 195 kg NPK per ha
, ,
compared to 1985
The efficiency of using fertilizer is only 30-50% and rest of themis absorbed into the soil or water
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
6/15
.and 17.129 meat production
centrals, total wastes estimatedat 73 m on tons per year.
.tons of manure wastes. Takinginto account other wastes, such
, ,etc, the total livestock wastes is
around 73 mill. tons per year
No Animal Quantity (1/8/2007)Average waste animal/per
one animal/ per dayTotal solid waste animal per
year (kg)
1 Cow 6724703 10 24.545.165.950
2 Buffalo 2996415 15 16.405.372.125
3 Pig 26560651 2 19.389.275.230
4 Poultry 226027.1 0.2 16.499.978.3
5 Coat 1777638 1.5 973.256.805
6 Horse 103481 4 151.082.260
7 Deer 31539 2.5 28.779.337.5
Total: 61.509.431.686
,
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
7/15
it is only 40% of total solid waste were treated and rest of them were discharged. 2, 2
it is a notable contributing factor to global warming and climate change.
there are only 12% of total centrals built a waste water treatment system and 74 % ofapplied Bioagas and composting as main treating method
Up to now, more than 100,000 biogas systems have been built, most of them are of.
are constructed in recent years.
Economic sector
Industry, 3,800 , 4%
Change of land use
and forestry ,
19,380 , 19%
Wastes, 2,500 , 2%
Agriculture, 52,450 ,
50%Energy, 25,600 ,
25%
Equivalent kt CO2 (CO2 + CH4 + N2O)
Source: Monre, 1994
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
8/15
Law on environmental protection, 2005
National strategy on Environmental Protection up toyear 2010 and Vision to 2020
Decree No. 59/2007/N-CP dated April 9, 2007 of
solid waste management activities, the right and duty
of the erson related solid wastes
Directive No. 36/2008/CT-BNN dated February 20, 2008 by Minister ofAgriculture and Rural development promulgating the plan on protectingthe environment in agricultural sector, in which major missions are
en ca on an rea men was e n or g na source, eve opmen animprovement waste treatment technology, primarily, encouragement inreusing and recycling agricultural waste.
rcu ar o 38 2010 - ate une 28, 2010 an come ntoforce on August 12, 2010 by Minister of Agricultural and ruraldevelopment has assigned management of pesticides in which
.
Official letter No. 2835/BNN-KH dated September 07, 2009 by Ministerof Agricultural and rural development approving development plan from
- n gr cu ture sector an rura eve opment. s ocument
identified specific goals need to be reached in next five years. Inhubandry field, aim is minimizing environmental pollution and building
- .
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
9/15
Lack of detailed regulations on agricultural wastes managementfor environmental protection, especially specific decree underLaws, circular to guide implementation.
Agricultural environmental management system has justestablished since 2008 while responsibility of functional
,environmental dimension is ignored.
There is not yet detailed policy addressing advantages wheninvesting into this sector
Limited awareness of agencies, enterprises and communities
about otential of a ricultural wastes Limited technologies
Opportunities for approach 3R on
agricultural management wastes
global climate change;needs to reduce the amount of agricultural wastes
Low awareness on environmental issues and potential benefitsof agricultural wastes
government agencies, business sector, and the general public;
biomass and biogas;
biological decomposition and new technologies potentials ofnew environmental sound products;
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
10/15
Vietnam is implemented by the Department of Livestock Production
(DLP) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) incooperation with the Netherlands Development Organization (SNV)
Overall objectives of the Project: Installing effectively domestic biogas technology eve op ng a v a e commerc a ogas sector Contributing to rural development and environmental protection via
provision of clean and affordable energy to rural households
Creating of jobs for rural labor Reducing of greenhouse gas emissions
Aiming to install 166,000 biogas systems by the end of 2012, theprogrammer has so far installed some 88,000 systems
-
Co-benefits refers to multiple benefits in different fields resulting from one policy,strategy or action plan
Source: http://www.kyomecha.org/cobene/e/cobene.html
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
11/15
-
-climate change perspective:
additional benefits beyond GHG
-regional/local perspective:
additional GHG reductionsre uct ons resu t ng rom c matechange mitigation measures
resu t ng rom measures a meto address
Reduced air pollution
Associated health benefits
Development issues, such as airpollution and associated health
mprove energy secur y rougreduced energy costs anddependency on oil imports
,and security and other socio economic problems
ncrease access to energy
Sources: Sophie Punte, Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities Center (CAI-Asia), January 2009
-
ene s:
For biogas users ex enditure saved b the substitution of other ener
sources with biogas (if applicable, income from the sale ofbiogas) Instead of wood: saved 240.000 Vnd per month nstea o coa : save 160.000 n per mont Instead of gas: saved 800.000Vnd per month Calculated followed the price in 11/2007: total expenditure
,
expenditure saved by the reduction of using chemicalfertilizers ( If applicable, income from the sale of bio-fertilizer) estimated about 1,9 million Vnd per month
Time saved for colleting and preparing previously used fuel
materials estimated opportunity cost about 2,3 million Vnd permonth
,
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
12/15
-
The benefits for the
environment
Item of benefit Amount
CO2 emission 176 thousand ess consump on on
firewood lessforestation
reduction tones per year
Reduced CO2emission
Number ofbeneficiaries
440,000 people
Total reduced CO2 emissionper year = 88.000 plants x 2tones of CO2 saving per plant
=Saving 591,6 million
,year
energyconsumption
Animal dung
Biogas plant
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
13/15
-
- Reduced smoke inside kitchen and enhanced health by
improving sanitation, hygiene, living conditions ga ng c ma e c ange increased yield by using bio-fertilizer Improved soil quality by using bio-slurry Reduced pressure on forests Reduced work load for women and children enhance
education opportunities and cultural knowledge Provisied of skill enhancement and employment for rural
areasCo-benefits
Developmentneeds GHG reduction
Major Developmental Challenges with Potential Co-
benefits on agricultural waste in Vietnam
Financial economical barriers:
For mostly farmers, cost for biogas installation is
high, in some cases, it is probably the largestinvestment made by a farmer
ac o suppor ve mec an sms or armers oaccess to credit
adversely affected the farmer's affordability
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
14/15
Major Developmental Challenges with Potential Co-
benefits on agricultural waste in Vietnam
Technical barriers
Research & Development: lack of research and development
improve efficiency and additional end uses for income-generating activities;
Orientation of the construction companies: the companiesengaged in plant construction have some negligence aboutthe quality control and after-sale-service.
Policies barriers and social awareness
Lack of detail regulation on renewable energy and incentivemechanisms to users and business operate in biogas field
Low awareness on potential co-benefits on biogas projects
omp e e ega ramewor or manag ng agr cu ura was es,approach 3R should be considered as a priority orientation.
Research and Development of biogas/compost fertilizer
production is encouraged for reducing environmental pollutionand effective exploitation of clean energy
Improve knowledge and awareness of community
Enhance financial for managemental activities and scienceresearch
Create olic forums to discuss co-benefits a roach withparticipation from decision-makers at different levels ofgovernance (regional, national and local)..
-
-
7/31/2019 Agricultural Waste-15 Khanh Day1 Session5
15/15