Melbourne Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd ABN 30 117 463 297
Suite 107, 757 Bourke Street
DOCKLANDS, VIC 3008
Ph (03) 9606 0041 Fax (03) 9606 0042
Sydney (Head Office)
Brisbane
Gold Coast
Kuwait
Consultants in Acoustics, Vibration & Structural Dynamics
email: [email protected]
website: www.renzotonin.com.au
ACOUSTIC REPORT - PLANNING APPLICATION STAGE
1030 TARNEIT ROAD, TARNEIT
MB098-02F01 (REV 1) ACOUSTIC REPORT.DOCX
23 AUGUST 2013
Prepared for:
Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
Milton, Queensland
Attention: Andrew Ashwood
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 2
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Date Revision History Non-
Issued Revision
Issued Revision
Prepared By
(initials)
Instructed By
(initials)
Reviewed & Authorised by
(initials)
23/08/2013 Draft 0 TM
23/08/2013 Final 1 TM RB
The work presented in this document was carried out in accordance with the Renzo Tonin & Associates Quality Assurance System,
which is based on Australian Standard / NZS ISO 9001.
This document is issued subject to review and authorisation by the Team Leader noted by the initials printed in the last column above.
If no initials appear, this document shall be considered as preliminary or draft only and no reliance shall be placed upon it other than for information to be verified later.
This document is prepared for our Client's particular requirements which are based on a specific brief with limitations as agreed to with
the Client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by a third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party
without prior consent provided by Renzo Tonin & Associates. The information herein should not be reproduced, presented or reviewed
except in full. Prior to passing on to a third party, the Client is to fully inform the third party of the specific brief and limitations
associated with the commission.
The information contained herein is for the purpose of acoustics only. No claims are made and no liability is accepted in respect of
design and construction issues falling outside of the specialist field of acoustics engineering including and not limited to structural
integrity, fire rating, architectural buildability and fit-for-purpose, waterproofing and the like. Supplementary professional advice should
be sought in respect of these issues.
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 3
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 4
2 APPLICABLE CRITERIA 4
2.1 RRL Infrastructure Requirements 4
2.2 Train Horns 5
3 ASSESSMENT OF NOISE IMPACTS 6
3.1 Rail Noise Modelling 6
3.2 Traffic Noise Modelling 6
3.3 Bedroom Noise levels 7
4 RECOMMENDATIONS 7
4.1 Properties not requiring Architectural Treatment 7
4.2 Properties requiring Architectural treatment 8
5 CONCLUSION 9
APPENDIX A - GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTIC TERMS 10
APPENDIX B - LOT YIELD BY FRONTAGE 12
APPENDIX C - NOISE CONTOUR MAP FOR THE SUBJECT LAND 15
APPENDIX D - NIMR NOISE CONTOUR MAPS DEMONSTRATING LMAX IS THE MORE
ONEROUS CRITERION 18
List of Tables
Table 1 – Typical Bedroom Treatment Requirements 8
Table 2 – Treatments to Bedrooms Facing Tarneit Road 9
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 4
1 INTRODUCTION
Renzo Tonin & Associates was engaged by Amex Corporation to provide an acoustic assessment
for the residential development of the southern and northern sections of the proposed
subdivision land at 1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit.
The southern parcel (precinct 1) lies between Leakes Road to the south and the Regional Rail
Link (RRL) corridor to the north. The northern parcel (precinct 2 & 3) lies between the RRL
corridor to the south and Dohertys Roads to the north. The proposed development is to include
a mix of mostly low density housing combined with approximately 75,870m2 of active / passive
open spaces and local amenities including a primary school.
The proposal includes several strips of medium density housing. The southern parcel includes
two extended sections, one of which is along the eastern boundary adjacent to Tarneit Road,
the other along part of the northern boundary adjacent to the RRL corridor. The northern parcel
also has medium density strips adjacent to the boundary to Tarneit Road and facing both
perpendicular and parallel to the RRL corridor boundary.
Under the Minister for Planning’s Direction in relation to consideration noise impacts associated
with the RRL2 project, key sources potentially affecting the site include trains operating within
the RRL corridor and traffic on Tarneit Road.
Along Tarneit Road proposed medium density housing acts as an effective noise barrier for the
rest of the site. In the southern parcel, adjacent to the proposed RRL corridor, medium density
housing acts as an effective noise barrier for the proposed passive open space. The work
documented in this report was carried out in accordance with the Renzo Tonin & Associates
Quality Assurance System, which is based on Australian Standard / NZS ISO 9001.
2 APPLICABLE CRITERIA
2.1 RRL Infrastructure Requirements
On the 28th of March 2012 the Minister for Planning issued a document entitled Minister’s
Directions for Operational Noise Response – Regional Rail Link Section 2 (the Minister’s
Directions). This document requires that an updated Noise Impact Management Report (NIMR)
includes:
“An assessment of the mitigation measures that would be needed to provide reasonable
confidence that existing and future dwellings adjacent to the rail line would normally be subject
to external noise levels from railway operations not exceeding both 80 dB LAmax and 55 dB
LAeq, 9hr (night).”, and that:
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 5
“A Design and Development Overlay (DDO) is to be developed for areas zoned for noise
sensitive uses adjoining the rail corridor for the purpose of requiring the adoption of building
designs and architectural treatments to limit internal noise levels in bedrooms to less than
65dB LAmax and 40 dB LAeq, 9hr (Night) for new developments. It is to be applied to land
where either measured or modelled residual noise levels from rail operations, in combination
with road traffic, would exceed the external noise levels of 80dB LAmax or 55 dB LAeq, 9h
(night) after the installation of the most effective and practicable noise mitigation measures.
The Minister’s Directions also state:
“For the purposes of these Directions, the RRL2 project comprises:
1. Two tracks for the length of the project area from the west of Werribee to Deer Park
and their use by regional passenger trains;
2. Stations at Wyndham Vale and Tarneit;
3. Road-over-rail overpasses; and
4. Bridges over rivers and creeks.
Other rail infrastructure, works or increases in services that may in the future be developed or
operate either within or adjoining the RRL2 project area are considered to be “additional” rail
infrastructure, works or services in the context of these Directions.”
The following assessment has been carried with regard to the RRL2 project as defined above.
Renzo Tonin & Associates has adopted these criteria for the assessment of operational rail noise
impacts on the subject land. It should be noted that the stated external noise levels are
consistent with those of the Victorian Passenger Rail Infrastructure Noise Policy, April 2013.
However this policy is silent on suitable indoor noise levels.
2.2 Train Horns
The Minister’s Directions are silent on noise associated with the operation of train horns. Train
horns are typically used adjacent to stations and level crossings, as the RRL2 project is grade
separated and there are no proposed stations adjacent to the subject land it has been assumed
that there will be no significant impacts associated with horn use.
None the less it should be noted that there is a proposed ‘future station’ adjacent to the subject
land. As this station falls outside the Minister for Planning’s definition of the RRL2 project,
associated horn noise has not been considered in this assessment. Should planning for this
station progress, it is recommended that associated horn noise impacts be considered with
respect to:
1. Sleep disturbance criteria consistent with the relevant VCAT Red Dot decisions; and
2. LAmax criterion consistent with that for operational rail noise (ie. 80dB LAmax).
It is expected that mitigation treatments required for compliance with these criteria would be
significantly more onerous than those required for operational rail and traffic noise (as
described below).
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 6
3 ASSESSMENT OF NOISE IMPACTS
3.1 Rail Noise Modelling
Modelling of operational rail noise was carried out implementing the Nordic prediction method
algorithms in SoundPLAN 7 proprietary modelling software, utilising the following inputs:
1. rail alignment data (horizontal and vertical) estimated from the NIMR and the Regional
Rail Link Section 2 Master-plan RRL2 Advisory Committee hearing maps;
2. All other inputs required to construct the model were taken from the NIMR.
When completed, the noise model was calibrated against noise contour maps presented in
Revision H of the NIMR, dated the 9th of December 2010, with a further 2dB(A) added to Lmax
levels as per the recommendations of the RRL2 Noise Advisory Committee.
Geometry representing the housing mix was then incorporated as per the Lot Yield by Frontage
(refer to Appendix B) applying the following allocations:
- Lots with frontage 6.5m to 10.5m are occupied by double storey dwellings
(including all medium density product)
- Lots with frontage 12.5m to 16m are occupied by single storey dwellings
Results for noise impacts on the developed land were then derived and presented in the form of
the noise contour map contained in Appendix C.
3.2 Traffic Noise Modelling
Modelling of traffic noise associated with the Tarneit Road grade separation (noise that may
potentially combine with rail noise to exceed the applicable criteria) was carried out
implementing the CoRTN88 algorithms in CadnaA proprietary modelling software. CadnaA and
CoRTN88 are accepted and approved for use by VicRoads. Results of traffic noise modelling
were produced for the year 2030 under the following assumptions:
- Identical traffic volumes as those on Derrimut Road, between Sayers Road and
Dohertys Road, taken from VicRoads Traffic Volume Data for Victoria, February 2013
(this document does not present data for Tarneit Road).
- A 8% mix of heavy vehicles, as taken from the above source
- Traffic volume growth rate of 2%
- Dense grade asphalt road pavement
- A traffic flow 80km/hr
- A ground absorption (ratio) of 0.6
- A -3dB correction to derive the LAeq metric from LA10 result
- The CoRTN 18 hour period from 6am to midnight represents the 9 hour night period.
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 7
These assumptions are expected to result in a conservative assessment and recommendations
for traffic noise as:
- Tarneit Road is not listed in the VicRoads data and therefore may have lower traffic
volumes,
- The LAeq occurring during the 9 hour period (10pm – 7am) is expected to be lower
than that occurring during the 18 hour periods (6am – midnight).
3.3 Bedroom Noise levels
Resultant noise levels were then calculated assuming:
- a typical bedroom size of 4000mm x 4000mm;
- a ceiling height of 2700mm;
- glazed openings (windows, doors) of approximately 3m2 in total;
- transmission loss of building elements as represented by the weighted reduction index,
Rw presented in Table 1 and Table 2 below;
- overall noise levels taken from the noise modelling results;
- a Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) source spectrum taken from an LAmax measurement of
Vline ‘Vlocity’ DMU operating on the Geelong Line at high speed on the evening of
Thursday the 18th of April 2013; and
- a traffic source spectrum in Leq taken from the Renzo Tonin & Associates company
database.
4 RECOMMENDATIONS
We are instructed that a noise wall is not deemed to be a practicable means of mitigation for
the subject land. Therefore the following recommendations relate to satisfying the criteria for
noise levels within bedrooms as defined by the Minister’s Directions.
For the purposes of this assessment compliance with LAmax criterion implies compliance with
LAeq, 9hr(night) criterion. This point is demonstrated by reference to the location of the
55dB(A) Leq and 80dB(A) Lmax thresholds in the attached (Appendix D) RRL2 ultimate
capacity (2030) noise contour maps taken from Appendix E of the NIMR (specifically the
80dB(A) reaches further outside the corridor then the 55dB(A) and hence is the more onerous
criterion).
4.1 Properties not requiring Architectural Treatment
Referring to the attached noise contour map in Appendix C, facades of bedrooms outside the
coloured areas or without hatching defined require no special treatment as noise levels at these
locations do not exceed 80dB LAmax and 55dB LAeq, 9hr(night).
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 8
4.2 Properties requiring Architectural treatment
Consistent with the Minister’s Directions, bedrooms of properties that are exposed to maximum
external noise levels greater than 80dB(A) shall be designed such that internal noise levels are
less than 65dB LAmax and 40dB LAeq, 9hr(night). No consideration is required for rooms of
other type. In order to allow for the most cost effective construction, typical treatments have
been provided which would apply to the façade noise level of the room in question. Façade
noise levels can be derived from the attached noise contour map.
Furthermore facades of bedrooms within the eastern medium density envelopes (both southern
and northern parcels), adjacent to Tarneit Road, shall be constructed as per Table 2. Where the
requirements of Table 1 and Table 2 conflict, the greater ‘minimum acoustic rating (Rw)’ and
associated form of construction shall apply.
Significant variation from the assumed typical bedroom attributes described above may trigger
a need for more onerous construction, such as thicker glazing or façade construction having
greater surface density.
Table 1 – Typical Bedroom Treatment Requirements
Façade Noise Level
LAmax
Minimum Acoustic Rating (Rw1) & Description of Typical Construction
Window & Door Assemblies
Ventilation Façade Roof/ceiling
91-94dB Rw≥35
Typically achieved with 10.38mm thick laminated glazing. Awning and casement elements are acceptable. Only special acoustic sliding elements will be acceptable.
Rw≥35
Bedroom requires attenuated ventilation that does not diminish the sound insulation of the façade/glazing, such as Aeropac Noise Absorbing Ventilator distributed by Acoustica Australia. Ventilation rates shall satisfy BCA requirements.
Rw≥41
Typically achieved by:
1. Lightweight construction consisting of a single 90mm timber stud with 6mm FC sheet fixed externally (or any sealed cladding having a surface density of not less than 9kg/m2) and 13mm thick standard plasterboard fixed internally. 75mm thick insulation having a density of not less than 12kg/m3 installed in cavities between studs.
2. Brick veneer with any internal plasterboard lining on a stud.
Rw≥40
Typically achieved by a pitched roof clad with tiles & sarking or 0.5mm thick metal deck over a ceiling consisting of a layer of 10mm thick standard plasterboard with 200mm thick insulation having a density of not less than 12kg/m3 laid atop. Eaves shall be boxed in using 6mm FC sheet or otherwise treated to prevent noise break-in to the roof cavity.
>80-91dB Rw≥32
Typically achieved with 6.38mm thick laminated glazing. Standard sliding doors with double fin seals will be acceptable. Selected sliding windows with double fin seals will be acceptable.
≤80dB No limitation
Notes: Rw = Weighted reduction index.
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 9
Table 2 – Treatments to Bedrooms Facing Tarneit Road
Minimum Acoustic Rating (Rw) & Description of Typical Construction
Window & Door Assemblies
Ventilation Façade Roof/ceiling
Rw≥35
Typically achieved with 10.38mm thick laminated glazing. Awning and casement elements are acceptable. Only special acoustic sliding elements will be acceptable.
Rw≥35
Bedroom requires attenuated ventilation that does not diminish the sound insulation of the façade/glazing, such as Aeropac Noise Absorbing Ventilator distributed by Acoustica Australia. Ventilation rates shall satisfy BCA requirements.
Rw≥55
Typically achieved by:
1. Brick veneer with any internal plasterboard lining on a separate stud. 75mm generic insulation installed between studs.
2. 150mm concrete panel with any internal lining.
3. Lightweight construction consisting of a single 90mm steel stud with 2 layers of 6mm FC sheet fixed externally and 2 layers of 13mm thick standard plasterboard fixed internally. 75mm thick insulation having a density of not less than 12kg/m3 installed in cavities between studs.
Rw≥40
Typically achieved by a pitched roof clad with tiles & sarking or 0.5mm thick metal deck over a ceiling consisting of a layer of 10mm thick standard plasterboard with 200mm thick insulation having a density of not less than 12kg/m3 laid atop. Eaves shall be boxed in using 6mm FC sheet or otherwise treated to prevent noise break-in to the roof cavity.
5 CONCLUSION
Renzo Tonin & Associates has completed an assessment of potential noise impacts to the
southern and northern sections of the proposed residential development at 1030 Tarneit Road
with respect to the Minister for Planning’s Directions. In reference to the noise contour map in
Appendix C, bedrooms of residential properties outside the coloured noise contours or not
defined by coloured hatching do not require any form of special acoustic treatment. Treatment
of bedrooms within the coloured noise contours has been graded subject to the degree of
attenuation required. Further to this the facades of bedrooms adjacent to Tarneit Road also
require acoustic treatment, similar to that required elsewhere. The suggested/required acoustic
treatments are considered to be within the bounds of what are relatively standard forms of
construction used in building projects, and as such are not considered unusually onerous.
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 10
APPENDIX A - GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTIC TERMS
The following is a brief description of the technical terms used to describe noise to assist in
understanding the technical issues presented.
Adverse Weather Weather effects that enhance noise (that is, wind and temperature inversions) that occur at a site for a significant period of time (that is, wind occurring more than 30% of the time in any assessment period in any season and/or temperature inversions occurring more than 30% of the nights in winter).
Ambient Noise The all-encompassing noise associated within a given environment at a given time, usually composed of sound from all sources near and far.
Assessment Period The period in a day over which assessments are made.
Assessment Point A point at which noise measurements are taken or estimated. A point at which noise measurements are taken or estimated.
Background Noise Background noise is the term used to describe the underlying level of noise present in the ambient noise, measured in the absence of the noise under investigation, when extraneous noise is removed. It is described as the average of the minimum noise levels measured on a sound level meter and is measured statistically as the A-weighted noise level exceeded for ninety percent of a sample period. This is represented as the L90 noise level (see below).
Decibel [dB] The units that sound is measured in. The following are examples of the decibel readings of every day sounds:
0dB The faintest sound we can hear
30dB A quiet library or in a quiet location in the country
45dB Typical office space. Ambience in the city at night
60dB CBD mall at lunch time
70dB The sound of a car passing on the street
80dB Loud music played at home
90dB The sound of a truck passing on the street
100dB The sound of a rock band
115dB Limit of sound permitted in industry
120dB Deafening
dB(A): A-weighted decibels. The ear is not as effective in hearing low frequency sounds as it is hearing high frequency sounds. That is, low frequency sounds of the same dB level are not heard as loud as high frequency sounds. The sound level meter replicates the human response of the ear by using an electronic filter which is called the “A” filter. A sound level measured with this filter switched on is denoted as dB(A). Practically all noise is measured using the A filter.
Frequency Frequency is synonymous to pitch. Sounds have a pitch which is peculiar to the nature of the sound generator. For example, the sound of a tiny bell has a high pitch and the sound of a bass drum has a low pitch. Frequency or pitch can be measured on a scale in units of Hertz or Hz.
Impulsive noise Having a high peak of short duration or a sequence of such peaks. A sequence of impulses in rapid succession is termed repetitive impulsive noise.
Intermittent noise The level suddenly drops to that of the background noise several times during the period of observation. The time during which the noise remains at levels different from that of the ambient is one second or more.
Lmax The maximum sound pressure level measured over a given period.
Lmin The minimum sound pressure level measured over a given period.
L1 The sound pressure level that is exceeded for 1% of the time for which the given sound is measured.
L10 The sound pressure level that is exceeded for 10% of the time for which the given sound is measured.
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 11
L90 The level of noise exceeded for 90% of the time. The bottom 10% of the sample is the L90 noise level expressed in units of dB(A).
Leq The “equivalent noise level” is the summation of noise events and integrated over a selected period of time.
Reflection Sound wave changed in direction of propagation due to a solid object obscuring its path.
SEL Sound Exposure Level (SEL) is the constant sound level which, if maintained for a period of 1 second would have the same acoustic energy as the measured noise event. SEL noise measurements are useful as they can be converted to obtain Leq sound levels over any period of time and can be used for predicting noise at various locations.
Sound A fluctuation of air pressure which is propagated as a wave through air.
Sound Absorption The ability of a material to absorb sound energy through its conversion into thermal energy.
Sound Level Meter An instrument consisting of a microphone, amplifier and indicating device, having a declared performance and designed to measure sound pressure levels.
Sound Pressure Level The level of noise, usually expressed in decibels, as measured by a standard sound level meter with a microphone.
Sound Power Level Ten times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the sound power of the source to the reference sound power.
Tonal noise Containing a prominent frequency and characterised by a definite pitch.
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 12
APPENDIX B - LOT YIELD BY FRONTAGE
50
50
49
50
50
49
49
50
50
49
50
50
49
49
A3
DATEAPP'D.PROJ./DRG.NO. REV. DRAWN
Existin
g Ease
ment
Station
Future Railway
(PART)
20.831Ha
A
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
LEAKES ROAD
PROPOSED ROAD WIDENING
3
4
5
6
21
0.750Ha
Passive Open Space
1.48Ha
Drainage Reserve
hydraulic engineers
Area to be confirmed by
8.0m wide
Linear Reserve / Landscape Buffer 5923m²
12
12
16
16
16
20
20
14.1
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
18
20
16
14.1
18
12
12
16
REGIONAL RAIL LINK
B
B'
A
A'
LEGEND
(PS701127 - 24.02Ha)
AMEX Site - Precinct 1
Stage Boundary
Access Street Level 1
Access Street Level 2
Connector Street
Lots 16 x 36m
Lots 14 x 32m
Lots 16 x 32m
Lots 12.5 x 32m
Lots 10.5 x 28m
Lots 8.5 x 28m
Lots 12.5 x 28m
Lots 14 x 28m
Lots 16 x 28m
Lots 18 x 40m
Lots 14 x 36m
Lots 16 x 36m
Lots 16 x 38m
Lots 16 x 40m
Lots 18 x 36m
Lots 18 x 38m
Medium Density Envelope
Lots 8.0m x 20m
Lots 9.0 x 20m
Lots 12.5 x 18-20m
Lots 11.75-12.75 x 16m
Lots 16 x 16m
Lots 15 x 18m
Community Facilities
Easement
Active Open Space
Linear Open Space
Passive Open Space
Tree Reserves
Drainage Reserve
Primary School
SCALE 1:2500
0 25 50 125m
080312-0076-00-UD 19.08.2013
PRECINCT 1 - PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
EFDG
Stage 5 - 45 Lots
Stage 1 - 53 Lots
Stage 2 - 55 Lots
Stage 4 - 42 Lots
STAGING
determined)
(configuration to be
Leakes Road
Proposed connection to
determined)
(configuration to be
Leakes Road
Proposed connection to
Loop road
AMEX TARNEIT NORTH - Lot 1 PS701127
Stage 3 - 49 Lots
Stage 6 - 50 Lots
screen adjacent intersection
5m wide Tree Reserve to
DOHERTYS ROAD
LEAKES ROAD
TA
RN
EIT
RO
AD
TA
RN
EIT
RO
AD
Em
bleto
n
Avenue
Cottesloe
Boule
vard
ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION EASEMENT
REGIONAL RAIL LINK ACQUISITION
PROPOSED ROAD WIDENING
PR
OP
OSE
D
PROPOSED ROAD WIDENING
RO
AD
WID
ENIN
G
DAM
DAM
REGIONAL RAIL LINK CORRIDOR
DWELLING
SINGLE STORY
EXISTING BRICK
DOHERTYS ROAD
DOHERTYS ROAD
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
DOHERTYS ROAD
DOHERTYS ROAD
G.I. SHED
G.I. SHED
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
POOL
53
.44
53.27
52.79
52.88
53.03
53.49
53.06
G.I. SHED
G.I. SHED
G.I. SHED
BBQ
WATER TANK
REGIONAL RAIL LINK CORRIDOR
GRATED PIT
53.13
52.95
52.89
52.73
52.96
53.11
53
54
55
50
51
52
50
51
52
50
51
51
52
53
51
52
53
53
54
5455
56
49
50
50
49
WATER PUMP
49
49
54
55
56
54
53
WATER TANK
W
G.I. SHED
DAM
DAM
REGIONAL RAIL LINK CORRIDOR
DWELLING
SINGLE STORY
EXISTING BRICK
G.I. SHED
G.I. SHED
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
POOL
53
.44
53.27
52.79
52.88
53.03
53.49
53.06
G.I. SHED
G.I. SHED
G.I. SHED
BBQ
WATER TANK
REGIONAL RAIL LINK CORRIDOR
GRATED PIT
53.13
52.95
52.89
52.73
52.96
53.11
53
54
55
50
51
52
50
51
52
50
51
51
52
53
51
52
53
53
54
5455
56
49
50
50
49
WATER PUMP
49
49
54
55
56
54
53
WATER TANK
W
G.I. SHED
21
20
17
18
16
19
15
14
12 13
1
3
11 6
7
22
8
10
9
5
2
4
0.91Ha
Passive Open Space
1.28Ha
Easement
Electricity Transmission
2.51Ha
Easement
Electricity Transmission
1.01Ha
Easement
Electricity Transmission
DOHERTYS ROAD
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
1.02Ha
Passive Open Space
3.64Ha
Primary School
3.72Ha
Active Open Space
0.75Ha
Passive Open Space
0.18Ha
Space
Open
Passive
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
Existin
g Ease
ment
0.668Ha
Recreation Amenities
0.257Ha
Space
Open
Passive
0.317Ha
Amenities
Recreation
3
4
5
6
21
0.750Ha
Passive Open Space
1.48Ha
Drainage Reserve
hydraulic engineers
Area to be confirmed by
8.0m wide
Linear Reserve / Landscape Buffer 5923m²
12
12
16
16
16
20
20
14.1
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
18
20
16
14.1
18
12
12
16
Existin
g Ease
ment
Station
Future Railway
(PART)
20.831Ha
A
TA
RN
EIT R
OA
D
LEAKES ROAD
PROPOSED ROAD WIDENING
Lots 18 x 40m
Lots 14 x 36m
Lots 16 x 36m
Lots 16 x 38m
Lots 16 x 40m
Lots 18 x 36m
Lots 18 x 38m
Medium Density Envelope
Lots 8.0m x 20m
Lots 9.0 x 20m
Lots 12.5 x 18-20m
Lots 11.75-12.75 x 16m
Lots 16 x 16m
Community Facilities
Easement
Active Open Space
Linear Open Space
Passive Open Space
Tree Reserves
Drainage Reserve
Primary School
Lots 15 x 18m
Lots 16 x 36m
Lots 14 x 32m
Lots 16 x 32m
Lots 12.5 x 32m
Lots 10.5 x 28m
Lots 8.5 x 28m
Lots 12.5 x 28m
Lots 14 x 28m
Lots 16 x 28m
Lots 6.5 x 28m
A3
DATEAPP'D.PROJ./DRG.NO. REV. DRAWN
LEGEND
Stage Boundary
Access Street Level 1
Access Street Level 2
Connector Street
(97.1705Ha)
AMEX Site - Precinct 2 and 3
STAGING
040312-0076-00-UD 16.07.2013
Stage 1 - 29 Lots
Stage 2 - 33 Lots
Stage 3 - 65 Lots
Stage 4 - 30 Lots
Stage 5 - 40 Lots
Stage 6 - 51 Lots
Stage 7 - 75 Lots
Stage 8 - 75 Lots
Stage 9 - 40 Lots
Stage 10 - 68 Lots
Stage 11 - 43 Lots
Stage 12 - 51 Lots
Stage 13 - 67 Lots
Stage 14 - 50 Lots
Stage 15 - 88 Lots
Stage 16 - 60 Lots
Stage 17 - 31 Lots
Stage 18 - 19 Lots
Stage 19 - 41 Lots
Stage 20 - 60 Lots
Stage 21 - 69 Lots
Stage 22 - 71 Lots
AMEX TARNEIT NORTH
PRECINCT 2 & 3 - PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
EFDG
SCALE 1:5000
0 50 100 250m
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 15
APPENDIX C - NOISE CONTOUR MAP FOR THE SUBJECT LAND
Scale: 1: 0 at A3
Consultants in Acoustics, Vibration & Structural Dynamics
Suite 218/87 Gladstone Street
South Melbourne VIC 3008
P: 03 9690 6005
Legend
WINDOW &
DOOR ASSEMBLIES
LOTS REQUIRING
ACOUSTIC TREATMENTS
Rw >= 32,
6.38mm THICK
LAMINATED GLAZINGRw >= 35,
10.38mm THICK
LAMINATED GLAZING
Noise Levels - dB(A)
... < 80.0
80.0 <= ... < 83.0
83.0 <= ... < 86.0
86.0 <= ... < 89.0
89.0 <= ... < 92.0
92.0 <= ... < 95.0
95.0 <= ... < 98.0
98.0 <= ...
RRL - AMEX LAND
NO MITIGATION
AMEX LAND AFTER PLAN 2015 / 2030
LAmax 1.5m ABOVE GROUND
FIG No.MB098-02 REV 1
OptionAMEX LAND
P01 SIZE A3
23/08/2013
© Renzo Tonin & Associates (VIC) Pty Ltd Acoustic Report - Planning Application Stage
1030 Tarneit Road, Tarneit
MB098-02F01 (rev 1) Acoustic report.docx Amex Corporation Pty Ltd
23 August 2013 Page 18
APPENDIX D - NIMR NOISE CONTOUR MAPS DEMONSTRATING LMAX IS THE
MORE ONEROUS CRITERION
Regional Rail Link Authority Regional Rail Link: Section 2Noise Impact Management Report
C:\_RRL\PROJECTWISE\YVONNE.MOON\DMS27941\RRL-2000-EAC-REP-0001-APPENDIX.DOCX RRL-2000-EAC-REP-0001
Page E43 KBR Arup Joint VentureRevision H 9 December 2010
Sheet 5 of 11
Regional Rail Link Authority Regional Rail Link: Section 2Noise Impact Management Report
C:\_RRL\PROJECTWISE\YVONNE.MOON\DMS27941\RRL-2000-EAC-REP-0001-APPENDIX.DOCX RRL-2000-EAC-REP-0001
Page E67 KBR Arup Joint VentureRevision H 9 December 2010
Sheet 5 of 11