Download - Academic Excellence Indicator System 2007-08
1
Academic Excellence Indicator System2007-08
Annual Report and Public Hearing
Midland ISDJanuary 13, 2009
2
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)
• Comprehensive reporting system defined by statute
• Published annually since 1990-91• Gives parents and community a snapshot of
• District/Campus Performance (Section I of AEIS Report)• District/Campus Profile (Section II of AEIS Report)
• Contains all data used to determine District/Campus accountability ratings
• Uses data collected through:• State data reporting system (PEIMS)• Student assessment system
3
AEIS Reports(Overview – Three Sections)
Cover Page
District Performance
District Profile
4
AEIS Reports(Cover Page)
• District 2008 Accountability Rating:• Academically Acceptable
• District PBM Special Education Monitoring Results:• Local Interventions Implemented • Each status is explained in detail in Appendix G to the
2007-08 AEIS Glossary (p. 57)
• District 2008 Gold Performance Acknowledgments: • None applicable at the district level• 52 received at the campuses -- an increase of 6
5
AEIS: 2008 Accountability Standards
Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Included
TestsTAKS
TAKS +
TAKS-Acc
(Group 1)*
TAKS +
TAKS-Acc
(Group 1)
TAKS +
TAKS-Acc
(All Grades/ Subjects)
TAKS +
TAKS-Acc + TAKS-M + TAKS-Alt
Standards AA/Re/Ex AA/Re/Ex AA/Re/Ex AA/Re/Ex AA/Re/Ex
Reading/ELA 65/75/90 70/75/90 70/75**/90 70/80**/90 TBD
Writing 65/75/90 65/75/90 70/75**/90 70/80**/90 TBD
Social Studies 65/75/90 65/75/90 70/75**/90 70/80**/90 TBD
Mathematics 45/75/90 50/75/90 55/75**/90 60/80**/90 TBD
Science 40/75/90 45/75/90 50/75**/90 55/80**/90 TBD
* TAKS-Accommodated (Group 1)• Science (Grades 5, 8, 10, 11); Spanish (5)• Social Studies (Grades 8, 10, 11)• ELA (Grade 11)• Math (Grade 11)
** Recognized Standard• In the 2007 Accountability Manual, the Commissioner proposed that
the Recognized standard increase to 80% in 2009• It will remain at 75% in 2009, but is scheduled to go to 80% in 2010
(subject to review in 2009)
6
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
• District performance indicators include:
• TAKS performance – Spring 2008 (p. 1 – 5)
• “Met Standard” by grade, subject, and student group• Divided by English and Spanish Test Takers
• Comparison to 2007 performance
• Comparison to State and Region performance
7
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
• District performance indicators include:• TAKS performance – Spring 2008 Accountability
Measure: “Met Standard” – Sum of All Grades Tested (3-11 or all grades tested at campus)
• By subject• Reading/ELA, Math, Writing, Science, Social
Studies• By student group
• All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged
8
2008 TAKS Performance Sum of All Grades Tested
2008 Accountability Indicator
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Reading/ ELA Math Writing Science Social Studies All Combined
State Midland
9
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
• District performance indicators include:
• TAKS Met 2010 Standard – Preview (p. 5)
• 2010 preview at Panel Recommendation• “Met Standard” by grade, subject, and student group
• Additional TAKS (Accommodated) subjects/grades• Reading and Math 3-10• Writing 4, 7
• Comparison to State and Region performance
10
TAKS Met 2009 StandardSum of All Grades Tested
2010 Accountability Indicator Preview
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Reading/ ELA Math Writing Science Social Studies All
State Midland
11
AEIS ReportsCommended Performance
• Achieved Commended Performance (p. 5)• ~90% of the items correct; Scale score of 2400
0
10
20
30
40
50
Reading/ ELA Math Writing Science Social Studies All
State Midland
12
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
• District performance indicators include:• TAKS/TAKS-Acc/TAKS-M/TAKS-Alt Participation (p.
6)• Sum of all grades by student group
• TAKS Exit-Level Cumulative Pass Rate (p. 6)• Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers (p. 7)• TGI (Texas Growth Index) (p. 7 and p. 33
Glossary)• Student Success Initiative Results (p. 7-9)• English Language Learners Progress Measure (not
shown this year)• Scheduled future accountability indicator
13
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
• District performance indicators include:• Attendance Rate (p. 9)• Annual Dropout Rate (2006-07) (p. 9)
• Grades 7-8 [Standard Accountability Measure]• Grades 7-12 [Alternative Accountability Measure]• Grades 9-12
• Completion Rate II (p. 10)• Class of 2007 (with GED) [Alternative Accountability
Measure]
• Completion Rate I (p. 10)• Class of 2007 (without GED) [Standard
Accountability Measure]
14
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
• District performance indicators include:• Attendance Rate (p. 9)• Annual Dropout Rate (2006-07) (p. 9)
• Grades 7-8 [Standard Accountability Measure]• Grades 7-12 [Alternative Accountability Measure]• Grades 9-12
• Completion Rate II (p. 10)• Class of 2007 (with GED) [Alternative Accountability
Measure]
• Completion Rate I (p. 10)• Class of 2007 (without GED) [Standard
Accountability Measure]
15
AEIS: 2008 Accountability Standards
• Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-8) (p. 9)
• Final Decision: Standards by Accountability Year (school year of dropout in parentheses)
2007(2005-06)
2008(2006-07)
2009(2007-08)
Recommended
(To be reviewed in 2009)
2010(2008-09)
2011(2009-10)
2010(2008-09)
Academically Acceptable ≤ 1.0%
≤ 2.0% ≤ 2.0 ≤ 1.8% ≤ 1.6% ≤ 1.4%Recognized ≤ 0.7%
Exemplary ≤ 0.2%
16
2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 7-8)
0.40.7
0.9
0
0.6 0.8 0.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
Midland
State ALL African American Asian Hispanic White Ec. Dis.
17
AEIS Key Issues for 2007-08
• Implementation of NCES definition of dropout impacted the following accountability indicators in 2006-07:
• Grade 7-8 dropout rate [Standard Accountability Measure]• Grade 7-12 dropout rate [Alternative Accountability Measure]• Completion Rate I [Standard Accountability Measure]• Completion Rate II [Alternative Accountability Measure]
• School Leaver Provision for 2007-08 • Dropout rate or completion rate cannot be the cause of a
lowered district/campus rating
18
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
• District performance indicators include:• Attendance Rate (p. 9)• Annual Dropout Rate (2006-07) (p. 9)
• Grades 7-8 [Standard Accountability Measure]• Grades 7-12 [Alternative Accountability Measure]• Grades 9-12
• Completion Rate II (p. 10)• Class of 2007 (with GED) [Alternative Accountability
Measure]
• Completion Rate I (p. 10)• Class of 2007 (without GED) [Standard
Accountability Measure]
19
2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 7-12)(2008 Alternative Education Accountability
Indicator)
2.7
4.1
6.2
1.9
5.2
2.4
7.7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Midland
State ALL African American Asian Hispanic White Ec. Dis.
20
AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance)
• District performance indicators include:• Attendance Rate (p. 9)• Annual Dropout Rate (2006-07) (p. 9)
• Grades 7-8 [Standard Accountability Measure]• Grades 7-12 [Alternative Accountability Measure]• Grades 9-12
• Completion Rate II (p. 10)• Class of 2007 (with GED) [Alternative Accountability
Measure]
• Completion Rate I (p. 10)• Class of 2007 (without GED)
[Standard Accountability Measure]
21
2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 9-12)(Report Only)
3.9
5.8
9
2.6
7.9
3.2
7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Midland
State ALL African American Asian Hispanic White Ec. Dis.
22
AEIS: 2008 Accountability Standards
• Completion Rate (HS) (p. 10)• Grades 9-12 (2003-04 Freshman Class) • Final Decision: Standards by Accountability Year (freshman year
of cohort in parentheses)
2007(2002-03)
2008(2003-04)
2009(2004-05)
Academically Acceptable 75% 75% 75%
Recognized 85% 85% 85%
Exemplary 95% 95% 95%
23
Completion Rate I(2008 Accountability Indicator) (p.
10)
• Percent of students (longitudinal measure) who first attended 9th grade in 2003-04 who graduated or who are continuing their education 4 years later:
• Graduated with class of 2007 (or earlier)• Re-enrolled in school in fall of 2007
24
Completion Rate IClass of 2007 (Longitudinal)
74.1
58.3
62.4
85.2
56.1
7.9
14.4
12.2
3.5
13
16.1
26.5
24
8.8
29.2
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
All
Afric Amer
Hispanic
White
Eco Dis
Grad Continued HS GED 4-Yr Dropout
State=78%
25
Violent and Criminal Incidents
• Texas statute (TEC 39.053) requires every district to publish an annual report on violent and criminal incidents at campuses in the district• Number• Rate• Type
• No conduct reported punishable as a felony
26
Violent and Criminal Incidents
191
41 34 31
870
13136 26 32
670
0
200
400
600
800
2005-06 2006-07
Drugs Alcohol Assault Tobacco Fighting
27
AEIS ReportsCollege Readiness Indicators
• District performance indicators include:• Advanced Courses/Dual Enrollment (p. 10)• Recommended High School Program
(RHSP)/Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP) Graduates (p. 10)
• AP/IB Results (p. 10)• Texas Success Initiative – Higher Education
Readiness Component (HERC) (p. 10)• SAT/ACT Results (p. 11)• College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2007) (p. 11)
• Scheduled future accountability indicator
28
Additional Indicators:College Readiness Indicators
• 19.3% of high school students completing an Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment –increase by 0.2% over prior year (p.10)
• 73.1% of 2007 graduates completing the RHSP/DAP – an increase by 2.7% from last year (p.10)
• 7.4% of AP students tested on at least one AP exam – increase of 2.4% over prior year examination results (p. 10)
• 38.8% of SAT/ACT scores at or above criterion – increase of 1.6% over prior year
29
Additional Indicators:College Readiness Indicators
• Texas Success Initiative (TSI)• HERC – Higher Education Readiness
Component• Measures Math and ELA proficiency• ≥2200 on both + 3 on writing• Includes TAKS-Accommodated
30
63%
27%
34%30%
49%
90%
79%85%86%
94%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All AfricanAmerican
Hispanic White Econ Disadv
High Ed Readiness Component TAKS Met Standard
Additional Indicators(2008 11th Graders Meeting HERC vs. Passing TAKS:
ELA)
31
56%
37% 39%33%
72%
91%
61%70%
67%
81%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All AfricanAmerican
Hispanic White Econ Disadv
High Ed Readiness Component TAKS Met Standard
Additional Indicators(2008 11th Graders Meeting HERC vs. Passing TAKS:
Math)
32
Additional Indicators:College Readiness Indicators
• College-Ready Graduates • High school graduates who:
• Met HERC standard on Exit Level ELA/Math; OR
• Scored >=500 on SAT Reading/Math and >=1070 Total; OR
• Scored >= 19 on ACT English/Math and >=23 Composite
33
27%
45%33%
53%
33%
46%49%
69%
45%
56%60%
41%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State All AfricanAmerican
Hispanic White Econ Disadv
ELA Math
Additional Indicators2007 College-Ready Graduates ELA & Math
State = 49% ELA
State = 56% Math
34
Additional IndicatorsSAT/ACT Results (p. 11)
• Tested:• All Students:
51.2%• Af. Amer.: 52.2%• Hispanic: 23.6%• White:
64.6%• Eco. Dis.: n/a
• At/Above Criterion• All Students:
38.8%• Af. Amer.: 11.4%• Hispanic: 19.0%• White:
44.3%• Eco. Dis.: n/a
35
Student Enrollment and Academic Performance
(Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board)
• Data collected and reported by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
• Reported for each high school in the district
• Reports on student performance in postsecondary institutions
• Most recent report (2005-06) available at:• http://www.txhighereddata.org/Interactive/HSCollLink.cfm
36
AEIS Reports(Section II - Profile) (p. 1-2)
• Student Information• By grade• Ethnicity• Program areas• Graduates• Retention rates• Class size
37
AEIS Reports(Section II - Profile)
• Staff Information (p. 3-4)• Professional staff• Educational aides/auxiliary staff• Ethnicity and gender• Degrees held• Experience• Average teacher salary• Turnover rate for teachers
• Financial Information (p. 5-6)• Tax information• Revenues• Expenditures
38
Campus Performance Objectives
• Campus Improvement Plans are based on the AEIS (available online on campus webpages)• Performance Objectives are approved by the
Board of Trustees (February Meeting)
• Data from the AEIS gives direction for the development of performance objectives that are low in relation to the accountability standards
39
Accessing the AEIS Report
• Public Hearing• January 13, 2009 – Board Meeting• Campuses schedule their own
meetings• Where the report is available
• TEA website • District website• Campus libraries or offices