1
Sample fraud awareness presentation
Combating Corruption and Fraud in WBG projects
Nigel Savage, JD, CFE International Fraud Expert and Man of Action
SavageFraud.com
Categories of corruption and fraud schemes• Corruption
o Bribes and kickbacks
o Hidden interests in contractors by project officials
• Bid rigging
o Rigged specifications
o Unbalanced bidding
o Leaking of bid information
o Change order abuse
• Fraud
o False statements and claims
o False and inflated invoices
o Failure to meet contract specifications
o Product substitution
• Collusive bidding by contractors o Agreements by bidders to inflate bid prices, rotate winning bidders, divide markets, etc.
2
3
1. A BRIBE is offered or demanded in exchange for the promise of a contract award or other favor, which leads to…
2. Some form of BID RIGGING to exclude the other, often more qualified and less expensive bidders, and finally…
3. FRAUD in by the bribe payer, to cover the cost of the bribe and exploit the corrupt relationship. The fraud can take the form of:
False, inflated or duplicate invoices Failure to meet contract specifications Substitution of cheaper inferior materials or products
Fraud is the most costly and disruptive stage.
The schemes often are linked…
4
Corruption
• Bribes & kickbacks • Conflict of interest
5
Bribes and kickbacks Giving a “thing of value”
1. “Gifts, travel & entertainment 2. Sexual favors3. “Study tours”4. Rental of properties, etc. 5. Cash payments6. Payments thru subs, local partners,
consultants, etc. 7. Hidden interests
To influence a contract award or execution:
S selection P price Q quantity Q quality D delivery…and F facilitate fraud
6
Why were bribes paid?
• To be short listed • For a contract award • To expedite the payment of invoices • For contract amendments and
extensions • To influence inspectors to accept
sub-par work or goods • To compromise auditors and NGOs• To avoid cancellation of the contract
for poor performance
7
Corruption case exampleWest Africa
8
Where the money ended up in the US…
9
Conflicts of interest
For example, an employee:
Secretly owns a supplier or contractor, or
Sets up a “shell company” through which he or she purchases supplies at an inflated price, or
Has an undisclosed interest in property sales or leases, etc.
10
Empty LotEmpty Lot Shop HouseShop HouseRice TraderRice Trader
Auto Repair ShopAuto Repair Shop
Front company addresses
11
Iraq UN “Oil for Food” case
1. Regime UNDER priced oil
sold through middlemen
2. Collected kickbacks from the
middlemen and buyers
3. OVER pricedfood and medicine, etc.
purchased thru middlemen
4. Collected kickbacks from
suppliers
12
Corruption red flags
• Complaints from losing bidders • “SPQQD” factors • Unjustified sole source awards • Multiple awards just under procurement thresholds • Pressure to select an unknown or unqualified contractor • Pressure to select a particular subcontractor or agent• Long delays in contract negotiations or award • Involvement of unnecessary broker or questionable agent • Undisclosed agent fees and commissions • Questionable contract amendments and extensions • Procurement staff live beyond their means
13
Bid rigging
Unbalanced bidding Rigged specifications Excluding qualified biddersLeaking bid data Manipulation of bids after receipt Unjustified sole source awards Split purchases Change order abuse
14
Bid rigging red flags
• Repeat [sole source] awards to the same bidders • Multiple awards just under thresholds (followed by change
orders or contract extensions)• Bids just at or close to budget or estimate• Narrow specifications• Ambiguous specifications• Unreasonable pre-qualification procedures • Short or inadequate notice to bidders• Fewer than the average or required number of bidders • Low bid awards followed by change orders
15
Collusive bidding
People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.
Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776
16
Collusive bidding: cartels
1 percentage point 1 percentage point steps variance fromsteps variance from
ABC ABC
Bidprice difference tothe designated
winner ascends in 10 mio CU steps
Severely overpricedearthworks component
Strange and unnaturalfinal bidprice
numbers
Companies B, C and F are
disqualified
Indicators Evidence
Cost Estimate:
104(1)d Embankment
191,930 m3 at 265.17 (unit price) = 50,894,239.32
© INT, The World Bank GroupReproduction and further distribution requires INT’s prior consent
17
Collusive bidding red flags
• Connections between bidders, e.g., common addresses, fax numbers or personnel; assignment of contract to losing bidder, etc.
• Persistent unexplained high prices• Unusual bid patterns; e.g. bids an exact % apart • Rotation of winning bidders • Same bidders bid; new bidders excluded • Losing bidders become subcontractors • False or forged bid securities
18
Fraud
• Delivery of expired, fake or adulterated drugs
• Reporting of exaggerated cure rates and project results
• False CV’s and company histories• False and plagiarized feasibility studies
and reports • Forged performance documents• Forged bid securities & manufacturer’s
certificates • Delivery of substandard goods or
equipment • False and inflated invoices
19
Aid-financed rural “school”
20
New aid-financed hospital
21
“New” hospital equipment
22
Narrow road
Road 30% narrower Road 30% narrower than specificationsthan specifications
No road surfacing, No road surfacing, contrary to contrary to specificationsspecifications
The contract wasThe contract was
paid in fullpaid in full
23
‘’Ten Year” urban roadThirteen months after completion
24
Design of spa for ecotourism centerDesign of spa for ecotourism center
Status after >50% disbursed with 30 days left to completion
Status after >50% disbursed with 30 days left to completion
Construction and billing fraud
Construction fraud
Poor quality concrete in slabs, beams and Poor quality concrete in slabs, beams and columns with extensive honeycombing columns with extensive honeycombing can result incan result in- a reduction of compressive strength- a reduction of compressive strength- a route for ingress of moisture to reach - a route for ingress of moisture to reach
and corrode the steel reinforcementand corrode the steel reinforcement
Plastered with cement to fill in the air holes at the surfacePlastered with cement to fill in the air holes at the surface The concrete mix itself appeared weak in cement content, both visually and to the touchThe concrete mix itself appeared weak in cement content, both visually and to the touch Columns were rotated a few degrees out of true in plan view which can lead to additional torsional stresses Columns were rotated a few degrees out of true in plan view which can lead to additional torsional stresses
at the junctions between columns and other structural unitsat the junctions between columns and other structural units Fixing of steel reinforcement within the formwork was of a poor standardFixing of steel reinforcement within the formwork was of a poor standard
26
Fraud red flags
• “Outliers,” “mismatches,” etc. • Poor quality goods or works • Missing or altered supporting documents• Inconsistencies between contractor’s claims
and inspections • Culture of corruption of inspectors • No costs booked by contractor for work
claimed • Complaints from users