double cycling (dc) cluster computation · web viewthe computation of dc clusters was based on the...
TRANSCRIPT
Supplemental Data 2
Double cycling (DC) cluster computation
The computation of DC clusters was based on the definition of clusters of ineffective
efforts (IEs) published by Vaporidi et al. (S1), where a cluster was defined as 30 wasted
efforts occurring in a period of 3 minutes (a frequency of approximately 50%),
assuming a respiratory rate of 20 breaths per minute. Taking into account that the
incidence of DC is lower than the incidence of IEs, and that DC may be potentially
more harmful than IEs, we decided to use a lower threshold to define the presence of a
DC cluster. Thus, we explored clusters in 3-min periods with 3 different thresholds
selected at 10%, 20%, and 30% (i.e., at least 6, 12, or 18 DC breaths in a 3-minute
period, respectively). Once clusters were identified, they were characterized in terms of
their power (i.e. number of DC events contained in the cluster), duration and area under
the curve (AUC) determined by integrating the portion of the DC event time-series
conforming the cluster. Next table summarizes the mean characteristics of DC clusters.
Adjunct figure shows a portion of waveforms (airflow, airway pressure and volume)
from a representative patient where an episode of DC cluster was identified.
In the table: Characteristics of double cycling clusters in terms of their power, duration
and area under the curve, for the three different thresholds used to define a DC cluster.
Values are indicated as median (25th, 75th percentiles) unless otherwise specified
AUC=area under the curve; bpm=breaths per minute
Threshold (minimum number of DC events in 3-min. period assuming a respiratory rate of 20 bpm)
10% (6) 20% (12) 30% (18)
Patients with DC cluster, n(% of total patients)
40(59.7%) 17(40.3%) 15(22.4%)
Cluster per patient, n 5.5(2, 12.5) 2(1, 5.5) 2(1, 3)
Power 41(19.7, 55.8) 76.7(43, 135.3) 144(76.8, 556)
Duration (min) 15.5(9.1, 29.3) 24.2(17, 43.7) 25(18, 86.4)
AUC 20.3(9.8, 27.7) 36.9(20.4, 65.1) 71.6(38.2, 278)
In the figure: (a) Clusters of double cycling in a representative patient. Time series of
double-cycling events (black trace) computed for non-overlapping 30-second intervals
in a selected time-frame: clusters are shown as shaded areas. We characterized the
clusters by their power, duration and area under the curve (AUC). The blue trace
represents the smoothed time series (running average with n = 6 points) used by the
algorithm to identify clusters. Starting and ending points are set at the 80% point from
the maximum value of the smoothed time series. Computations were based on the
original mathematical description by Vaporidi et al. (S1), and 3 different thresholds
were explored (as reported in the table). In this particular example, clusters were
defined as period of time where double cycling represented at least a 20% breaths (i.e.,
≥2 events in 30-second intervals, assuming a respiratory rate of 20 breaths per minute).
(b) Tracings of airflow, airway pressure and volume where episodes (red marks) of
double cycling were identified by Better Care™ software. This segment corresponds to
2 min of the 26-minute cluster of the double cycling episode represented in (a).
10620 10640 10660 10680 10700 10720 10740
0
1
2
3
4
num
ber o
f DC
Power = 61 Duration (min) = 26
AUC = 30.5
(a)
(b)
time (min)
Supplemental References
S1. Vaporidi K, Babalis D, Chytas A, Lilitsis E, Kondili E, Amargianitakis V,
Chouvarda I, Maglaveras N, Georgopoulos D. Clusters of ineffective efforts during
mechanical ventilation: impact on outcome. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43:184-191.