dose to warm magnets
DESCRIPTION
DOSE TO WARM MAGNETS. E. Skordis & F. Cerutti loss input by: E. Quaranta , R. Bruce and S. Redaelli Protection screen design with: P. Fessia , L. Favre , P. A. Thonet. IR3: THE TCAPD ROLE (@7 TeV ). IR3 Geometry and Sixtrack Lossmap profile. MQWA.CE5L3. MBW.B6L3. MBW.A6L3. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
DOSE TO WARM MAGNETS
E. Skordis & F. Ceruttiloss input by: E. Quaranta, R. Bruce and S. Redaelli
Protection screen design with: P. Fessia , L. Favre, P. A. Thonet
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 1
IR3:THE TCAPD ROLE
(@7 TeV)
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 2
IR3 Geometry and Sixtrack Lossmap profile
Beam 1
MBW.C6L3
TCAPA.6L3
MQWA.CE5L3MQWA.E5L3
TCAPD.6L3
MBW.B6L3 MBW.A6L3
TCSG.5L3TCP.6L3
Z (m)
Coun
ts Average interaction depth: 47 μm
Average interaction longitudinal position: 14.9 cm
All particles are impacting the inner jaw.
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 3
MBW Peak Dose profile [I]
Beam 1
MBW.C6L3
TCAPA.6L3
MQWA.CE5L3MQWA.E5L3
MBW.C6L3
MBW.B6L3
TCAPD.6L3
MBW.B6L3 MBW.A6L3
TCSG.5L3
Beam 1 Beam 1
obviously the TCAPD plays no role
MBW.A6L3
TCP.6L3
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 4
MBW.C6L3
Beam 1
MBW.C6L3
TCAPA.6L3
MQWA.CE5L3MQWA.E5L3
MBW.B6R7
TCAPD.6L3
MBW.B6L3 MBW.A6L3
TCSG.5L3
Beam 1
Beam 2 @ 6.5 TeV
MBW Peak Dose profile [II]
(per proton lost)2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 5
MQWA.E5L3 Peak Dose profile
Beam 1
the TCAPD halves the dose
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 6
MQWA.E5L3 Peak Dose profile
Beam 1
MQWA.E5R7
Beam 2 @ 6.5 TeV
(per proton lost)
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 7
MQWA.D5L3 Peak Dose profile
Beam 1
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 8
MQWA.C5L3 Peak Dose profile
Beam 1
the most impacted one!following the TCSG
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 9
MQWA.5L3 Peak Dose profile
Beam 1
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 10
MQWA.B5L3 Peak Dose profile
Beam 1
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 11
MQWA.A5L3 Peak Dose profile
Beam 1
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 12
MQWA.E4L3 Peak Dose profile
Beam 1
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 13
Conclusions
• The TCAPD halves the peak dose in the MQW directly protected (MQWA.E5L3)
• However for the most impacted one (MQWA.C5L3), following the TCSG, the reduction is limited to ~ 30%
• The effectiveness of a dedicated shielding, to be embedded in the magnet, is under study (See next part)
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 14
IR7:Possible protection screen effect
(@6.5 TeV)
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 15
MBWA - MBWB Peak Dose profileBeam 2
MBW.BMBW.A
TCAP
MQWA.E5R7MQWA.D5R7
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 16
MBWA - MBWB Peak Dose profile
MBW.A6R7 MBW.B6R7
Beam 2Beam 2
Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )
MBW.A6R7 with Flanges
Beam 2
MBW.B6R7With Flanges
Beam 2
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 17
MBWA - MBWB Peak Dose profile
MBW.A6R7Flanges +
Protection
MBW.B6R7 Flanges +
Protection
Beam 2Beam 2
MBW.A6R7 with Flanges
Beam 2
MBW.B6R7With Flanges
Beam 2
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 18Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )
MBWB Dose 2d cross section at maximum No protection
Dose (MGy)
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 19Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )
MBWB Dose 2d cross section at maximum With protection
Dose (MGy)
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 20Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )
MQWA.E5R7 Peak Dose Profile
Beam 2Beam 2
Old ModelWith Flanges
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 21Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )
MQWA.E5R7 Peak Dose Profile
Beam 2
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 22Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )
MQWA.D5R7 Peak Dose Profile
Beam 2
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 23Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )
MQWA.C5R7 Peak Dose Profile
Beam 2
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 24Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )
MQWA. 5R7 Peak Dose Profile
Beam 2
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 25Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )
MQWA.B5R7 Peak Dose Profile
Beam 2
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 26Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )
MQWA.A5R7 Peak Dose Profile
Beam 2
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 27Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )
MQWA.E4R7 Peak Dose Profile
Beam 2
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 28Normalization: 1.15 1016 p (50 fb-1 )No protection was added to this model
Protection Is needed due to comparable Peak dose with MQWA.E5R7
MQWA.E5R7 Dose 2d cross section
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 29
MQWA.E5R7 Dose 2d cross section
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 30
MQWA.E5R7 Dose 2d cross section
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 31
5770
5670 2310
1780
1670
50
70
2030 2130
22301950
50 110
500 110
1250720
370
210
290
570
4550 640
1290
Values are in pJoule/proton lost in the collimators
MQWA.E Energy Deposition on varius elements
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 32
60
2020
90
With Protection
Temperature Increase in protective Elements
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 33
MBW MQW-front MQW-mid MQW-Top/Bot
( GeV/p)1.6 5.9 4.7 2.8
(Kg)3.2 12.8 8.7 14
Temp Increase (°/s)0.055 0.050 0.059 0.022
0.91011 𝑝𝑠 (𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑜𝑓 1h )
𝑎=¿𝐺𝑒𝑉𝑝 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑛 h𝑡 𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑦
𝑏=𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛 𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑦
Conclusions
• The protection screen for the MBWs provides a peak reduction of a factor of 3
• For the MQWs the effect is again a reduction of a factor of 3, however, increasing the radius of the front cylindrical screen and increasing the length of the inner protection could improve performance
• Design to be finalised (Cabling)
2/9/2013 Collimation Working Group E. Skordis 34