documentation projects: from proposals to reports information is a cornerstone in the struggle...
TRANSCRIPT
Documentation projects: from proposals to reports
Information is a cornerstone in the struggle against discrimination
Information is a cornerstone in the struggle against discrimination
Facilitator: Judith Dueck HURIDOCS: Human Rights Information and
Documentation Systems International
A selection of slides used in the training workshop
July, 2008
Events happen, a negative situation exists
Fact Finding and MonitoringFact Finding and Monitoring: Info Gathering, Investigation etc.
Documentation: Organizing the elements of information
Research: Background and related information
Analysis: What does the data mean?
Report preparation
Intervention (legal, medical, humanitarian etc.)
Information dissemination and action for change
Assessment and strategy revision
3
FACT-FINDING and Monitoring
• FACT-FINDING -- identifying the violations in one event, and establishing the facts relevant to the violations.
• MONITORING -- the close observation of a situation or individual case (over long term).
4
Conducting investigations through trained observers (interviews, observation, on site inspections etc.)
Placing skilled workers in strategic areas to collect and document information on acts as they occur
Hot lines
Cameras, tape recorders, cel phones, PDAs
Using a low-profile fact-finding delegation consisting of persons from the locality (Low pressure, low publicity)
Using a high-level delegation of local well-known personalities
Using an international delegation
Trial observations and prison visits
Non-governmental tribunals and inquiry commissions
Surveys, research, examination of primary documents
Forensic investigations (disinterment, autopsy)
Getting the facts Getting the facts
5
Fact-Finding
• Acts committed (single or multiple), including
updates on developments• Victims (individuals or groups)• Perpetrators (individuals or groups) including
respective levels of involvement• Details of the event and context
• The interventions carried out on the victims’ behalf
• Sources of information (e.g. witnesses)
6
What is high quality information?
• First-hand (not rumour or hearsay)
• Detailed
• Internally consistent
• Corroborated from several angles
• Demonstrates a pattern
• Fresh
7
Sources of bias
The sample does not reflect the whole Interaction interviewer/interviewed Respondents report inaccurately on
purpose Cultural attitudes, inattention, lack of
understanding, pressure of time and place Inability to remember Lack of understanding of question Ideological bias of data collector, or
sources
8
Confidentiality
Ensuring that your sources’ identity remain secret when they have asked for anonymity or you deem the situation too dangerous to release such information
9
Gender / orientation Sensitivity
• Ensuring that rights are respected regardless of gender or orientation
• Ensuring that violations and discrimination are recognised and properly documented regardless of gender or orientation
• Ensuring that information is handled sensitively with respect to gender and orientation issues
10
Supporting materials:
• Hospital or clinic reports
• Correspondence (letters etc.)
• Police reports
• Official responses to allegations
• Newspaper articles & other news Media
• Interview texts
• Photographs, videos
11
Common fact-finding difficulties
• Lack of access to area• Threat to personal security• Threat to security of witnesses• Gathering unreliable information• Reluctance of a witness to provide information• Lack of awareness concerning human rights• Lack of training or resources for fact-finding• Difficulty asking sensitive questions
Session 5
12
Monitoring
May involve collecting a large quantity of data Requires constant or periodic investigation and
documentation of developments Uses standards or norms to assess the situation Results in a report, which provides a basis for
further action
14
Who Monitors?
Set standardsMonitor compliance of governments with their treaty obligationsMonitor certain situations involving violations
Encourage own governments to adopt international standardsMonitor compliance of their own governments with treaty obligations Monitor violations
Lobby with IGOs toward setting standardsLobby with governments toward adopting international standardsMonitor compliance of governments with their treaty obligations Monitor violations and casesEnhance public awareness
INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS (IGOs)
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS (GOs)
NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS (NGOs)
15
What are the standards or norms?
DOMESTIC
STANDARDS DOMESTIC
APPLICATION
UNIVERSAL
STANDARDS
Monitoring is done to see whether there are gaps between universally-accepted standards and those set through domestic (national) legislation.
. . . or between domestic standards and how they are applied or met in reality.
16
Regulating mechanisms
state
people
ExternalMechanisms:• Other States•U.N. Organs such as UPR, Human Rights Council, Office of the High Commissioner• UN treaty body mechanisms: commissions, rapporteurs, special representatives, etc International media•IGOs
InternalMechanisms:• Parliament• Judiciary• Ombudsmen, NHRI, etc• Civil society• media
17
INTERVENTION AND COMMUNICATION
Hardcopy storageDigital storage
INTAKE OF INITIALINFORMATION
FACT-FINDING or Monitoring
ANALYSIS TO ARRIVE AT FINDINGS
ANALYSIS OF TRENDSAND PATTERNS
Interviews, Surveys, videos, other info gathering techniques.
ORGANISING AND RECORDING
Reports and Advocacy
Proposals
local background information
local legal infrastructure
governmental organizations
social services agencies
international organizations
university libraries, public libraries
Co-operation with other NGOs
Law offices
Media reports (papers, radio, T.V. etc.)
the Internet. HuriSearch. http://www.hurisearch.org/
ResearchResearch
Source: European Handbook on Equality Data
Why?
• To provide a historical record• To assist and pressure governments in
applying international standards or adopting new legislation
• To undertake domestic legal actions• To engage in campaigns with the intent of
enhancing public awareness• To help particular victims• To provide early warning of potential dangers• To engage in change strategies
21
Why?
What change do you want?
Monitoring and Fact finding
AnalysisResearch
Documenting (organizing)
Strategizing Report preparation
InterventionsInformation dissemination
Action for change andEvidence based advocacy
Assessment and strategy revision
22
Effective Action for change
What are the official standards?(domestic law, international standards, norms)
What can be reasonably expected?
What is the situation?
What are the facts?
What is the trend?
What should be…. What isWhat should be…. What isWhat should be…. What isWhat should be…. What is
23
Three kinds of obligations
• To respect: to abstain from doing anything that violates the integrity of an individual, or group, or infringes on their freedom.
• To protect: to take the necessary measures necessary to prevent others from violating the rights of an individual or group.
• To fulfill: to ensure opportunities for each person to obtain satisfaction of needs recognized by human rights instruments that cannot be secured through personal efforts alone.
24
Two kinds of violationsActs of commission: direct commission
of a violation (police beatings)
Acts of ommission: failure to provide adequate protection or take adequate step to prevent the violation (police refusing to protect while others beat)
Acts of Commission
26
Types of Acts: Acts of Commission
• Physical attacks
• Distribution of hate propaganda
• Discrimination in hiring
• Discrimination in School admission
• Passing laws that discriminate
• Implementing discriminatory laws or policies
27
Types of Acts: Acts of Omission
• Failure by law enforcement bodies to protect victims against attacks by discriminatory groups
• Failure by the legislature to enact laws that protect citizens from discrimination
• Failure to remove discriminatory laws
Events happen, a negative situation exists
Fact Finding and Monitoring: Info Gathering, Investigation, Interviewing etc.
Research: Background and related information
Documentation: organizing elements of information
Analysis: What does the data mean?
Report preparation
Intervention (legal, medical, humanitarian etc.)
Information dissemination and action for change
Assessment and strategy revision
30
What information do we need ?• Information about the victim
• Information about the perpetrator
• Information about witnesses, observers, medics etc.(source / corroboration of information)
• Information about the act
• Information about the background or surrounding circumstances (event)
• Information about any interventions
31
The Person
• Victim• Perpetrator• Source of information• Intervening Party
• Individual• Group • Organization
• Anybody involved in anywayPage 36 and 57-63
32
What info do you need to get?
1. Victim – person or organization
2. Perpetrator – person or organization (official or not)
3. Source of information (persons, observers, people, organizations etc.)
4. Intervening parties (legal, humanitarian, medical, social services, individuals)
33
• can be classified (e.g. beating, arrest, torture, execution)
• very specific, occurred at a specific time
ACT
• Has broader scope (starting and ending dates, general location, etc.)
• Has some sort of identifier (event title like “The Case of J. Doe)
• Usually includes serveral acts and general situation information
EVENT
Acts and Events
PERSON is an individual or group who plays the role
of Victim, Source, Perpetrator,
Intervening
Party or other organisation or
person
ACT is a very
specific occurrence within an
Event
Act links Victims to
Events
EVENT is a general
occurrence which may have one or more Acts
Three formatsThree formatsThree formatsThree formats
36
Documenting violations
The Person
903 Name
908 Confidentiality
910 Address
911 Date of Birth
912 Place of Birth
916 Sexual Orientation
918 Civil Status
919 Dependants
920 Education
922 Occupation
924 Health
926 Physical Description
928 Date Deceased
930 Group Description
931 Number of Persons in Group
940 Religion
941 Citizenship
942 Ethnic Background
945 Language
947 National Origin
The Event
102 Event Title
111 Geographical Term
112 Local Geographical Area113 Initial Date
114 Final Date
115 Event Description116 Impact of Event151 Violation Status152 Violation index153 Rights Affected
The Act2114 Method of Violence2116 Physical Consequences2117 Psychological Consequences2118 Age at Time of Victimisation2154 National Legislation2155 International Instruments
102 Event Title Desacula et al. 111 Geographical Term Philippines 112 Local Geographical Area National Capital Region 113 Initial Date 18 11 1987115 Event Description Edgar Desacula was arrested together with Ramon Aguilar by members of the Pasay City Police Force at Roxas Blvd at about 13:00. They were brought to the police headquarters for questioning. Aguilar was released while Desacula was passed to the Intelligence and Special Operations Group (ISOG) which conducted tactical interrogation and subjected him to torture for a period of 2 days. Desacula continues to be detained.150 Remarks. The events happened after the Ministry of Defence announced that it will take stronger steps against militant labour.151 Violation Status Confirmed 152 Violation Index Violent or coercive act by state agents153 Rights Affected Liberty of the person / Freedom from torture 154 HURIDOCS Index Detention] / Torture 155 Local Index Labour militancy 165 Comments This event should be investigated further to see if it is connected with thereported raid of the office of the Victory Labour Union 166 Supporting Documents Photo 87-331167 Files 87-NCR-010 172 Monitoring Status Active
Sampling of Available Fields
37
What fields do you need?
What fields might you choose for information about the victim, the perpetrator, the act, the event
- Employment or housing discrimination - Discrimination in prisons or by police- Discrimination in health services or schools- Hate speech in the media or from government
sources
Use Events Formats pages 32- 36
39Opening screen of WinEvsys
40
Microthesauri 48 Lists HURIDOCS INDEX TERMS RIGHTS TYPOLOGY TYPES OF ACTS METHODS OF VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTSEDUCATION OCCUPATIONS (ILO CATEGORIES) PHYSICAL DESCRIPTORS RELIGIONS ETHNIC GROUPS LANGUAGES GEOGRAPHICAL TERMS TYPES OF SOURCE MATERIAL TYPES OF LOCATIONS DEGREES OF INVOLVEMENT TYPES OF INTERVENTION RELEVANT CHARACTERISTICS TYPES OF PERPETRATORS STATUS AS VICTIM LEGAL COUNSELTYPES OF COURTSAUTOPSY RESULTS STATEMENTS SIGNEDMEDICAL ATTENTIONSEXUAL ORIENTATION
Sampling of Lists Available
Event classification (sample of fields)102 Event title: Make up a name 108 Confidentiality: (yes or no)
112 Local Geographic area: (province, district, village or town)
113 Initial date of event : ddmmyyyy 114 Final date of event:
151 Violation Status: (MT 41 – p 164)
154 Index terms (MT 1 – page 9):
153 Rights affected (MT 3 – page 20)
161 Date of entry: today ddmmyyyyhhmm 162 Entered by: you
Act Identify and describe in a few words (by state actors or those in authority)
Date PerpetratorMT 24 p. 145
Type of Act MT4 page 27
Type of PlaceMT 17 Page 131
Early morning arrest 050219990800
police Arrest (03)
Victim’s home
Events happen, a negative situation exists
Fact Finding and Monitoring
Documentation: Organizing information
Research: Background and related information
Analysis: What does the data mean?
Report preparation
Intervention (legal, medical, humanitarian etc.)
Information dissemination, action for change and evidence based advocacy
Assessment and strategy revision
43
Why do we need to analyze data?
We need give undeniable, credible evidence • Find out what really happened• Convince legislators• Arouse other human rights workers to action• Provide evidence for indictment and prosecution of
perpetrators in tribunals and national courts• Provide information for truth and reconciliation
commissions• Get cooperation from media in spreading the word• Counter the claims of perpetrators• Provide an undeniable record to bring closure to
victims and survivors• Manage your own operations
44
How does data analysis help us achieve these goals?
When we analyze data, we can:• Show the pattern over time• Assess the magnitude and scope of human rights
violations• Find patterns of violation that help identify specific
perpetrators• Determine the different patterns of violations against
different ethnic groups, sexes, age groups, orientations etc• Relate violations to the actions of perpetrating regimes,
organizations groups, or individuals• Show how acts of repression are coordinated throughout a
country, region, or in time• Give substantive evidence against perpetrators without
revealing the identity of witnesses• Provide analytical measures of the extent to which rights
are granted or denied•
Raw data in a tableName Cause Name Cause Ngudle suicide by hanging Mazwembe suicide by hanging Merhope not given Mbatha suicide by hanging Tylta suicide by hanging Mzolo not given Saloojle fell 7 floors during
interrogation Tshwane not given
Gaga natural causes Mamasila not given Hoye natural causes Mosala not given Hamakwayo suicide by hanging Tshalzlbane not given Shonyeka suicide Botha fell down stairwell Leong Pin suicide by hanging Ntshuntsha not given Ah Yan suicide by hanging Ndzaga not given Madiba suicide by hanging Malel not given Tubakwe suicide by hanging Mabelane not given Not given not given Joyi not given Kgoathe slipped in shower Malinga not given Modipane slipped in shower Khoza suicide by hanging Lenkoe suicide by hanging Mashabane suicide Mayekiso suicide Mabija fell six floors during
interrogation Monakglotla thrombosis Loza not given Haron fell down stairs Hafferjee not given Cuthsela natural causes Emzizi not given Timol leapt from 10th story
window during interrogation
Mogatusi suffocation in epileptic fit
Mdull fell against chair during scuffle
Biko injured in scuffle
Mohapi suicide by hanging
From: Spirer & Spirer. Intermediate Data Analysis for Human rights
Controlled vocab and statsControlledVocabulary Cause
Stated Cause
Fell Fell 7 floors during interrogation, fell against chair during scuffle, fell down stairs, fell down stairwell, fell six floors during interrogation
Scuffle Injured in scuffle
Jumped Leapt from 10th story window during interrogation
Natural Natural causes
Not given Not given
Slipped Slipped in shower
Suffocation Suffocation in epileptic fit
Suicide Suicide, suicide by hanging
Thrombosis Thrombosis
Cause Number %
Not given 16 36%
Suicide 15 33%
Fell 5 11%
Natural 3 7%
Slipped 2 4%
Jumped 1 2%
Scuffle 1 2%
Suffocation 1 2%
Thrombosis 1 2%
Total 45 100%
Reasons, numbers and percentages of all deaths in prison X.
Based on raw data from government sources
47
TABLE Number of physical assaults in Prison X
Year Number
1995 26
1996 41
1997 12
1998 97
1999 83
2000 11
48
100 ----------------------------------------------------------- 90 ----------------------------------------------------------- 80 ----------------------------------------------------------- 70 ----------------------------------------------------------- 60 ----------------------------------------------------------- 40 ----------------------------------------------------------- 30 ----------------------------------------------------------- 20 ----------------------------------------------------------- 10 ----------------------------------------------------------- 0 ----------------------------------------------------------- 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 YEARS
Graph 1. Number of physical assaults in two prisons
Line Graphs
Prison A
Prison B
49Not Private Enough: Homophobic and injurious speech in the Lithuanian media Lithuanian gay league
BAR Graph
50
Town Y(28%)
town X(16%)
Town W(64%)
Power ReactorIndustrialMedicalGovernment
Town Z(2%)
Comparison of homophobically motivated physical incidents in 4 towns.
Pie graphs compare parts of a whole
Percentages of total incidents from all 4 towns
Between January 2005 and now, have you experienced any of the following situations on the grounds that you were
known or suspected to be a homosexual or bisexual?
– verbal harassment/aggression– insults, humiliation, ridicule– spread of negative opinions about you– threats– hateful letters to you or to your close
relatives– blackmail– vandalism, devastation of property– graffiti/posters/leaflets about you– other forms of psychological
harassment: please, specify– no– other answer: please specify
Report on discrimination based on sexual orientation in Poland for the year 2005 by Campaign Against Homophobia (KPH, Poland)
52
The application should not exceed 5 pages (+ budget). Please, answer all questions following the structure
Project title:
Planned period of implementation:
Name of the implementing organization:
Contact information (post, e-mail, phone):
Contact person:
Date of organisaton’s registration with the authorities:
Date of project submission to ILGA-Europe:
1.Project summary (maximum 100 words)!!! 2.Description of the implementing organization:a.What kind of organization are you (mission, vision, values)? b.How long have you been in existence?c.What is the structure of your organization (board, staff, volunteers, members, include numbers)?d.What kind of activities does your organization undertake?
Credibility?
Reliability?
Can you do it?
What is the project?
Why is this project important?
What will it change?
53
Objective
what is the purpose?
Methodology
how will you do it?
Output
what is the tangible output?
Change strategy
How will you use the info to effect change?
Success evaluation
How will you measure your success?
Impact
What is the overall impact you expect?
54
• Why am I writing this? • What do I want to achieve? • Who am I writing for? • What do I want people to think, feel,
know or do after they have read it? • What would be the best form for it to be
written in? An article, pamphlet, poster, etc?
With thanks to: CIVICUS Better Communications and Planning Civil Society Toolkits for some materials in this section. http://www.civicus.org/new/civicus_toolkit_project.asp
55
Why do we write reports?• Communicate information and ideas about your work,
and that of your organisation.• Reflect and explain progress with work – and lack of
progress.• Make it easier for your organisation to assess progress
and plan anew.• Promote accountability.• Promote discussion and informed decision-making.• Emphasise problems and make recommendations.• Share information, learnings and experiences. • Provide analysis and offer insights into the way forward.• Help with effective and strategic planning.• Help members to participate in the democratic
processes of your organisation.
56
Doing an audience analysis
Step One: Distinguish between your various audiences
Step Two: Prioritise within your audience
Step Three: Picture your audience
Step Four: Use the audience analysis matrix
Adapted from CIVICUS Better Communications and Planning Civil Society Toolkits
57
How do people read reports?
• Title
• Headings and subheadings
• Introduction and conclusion
• Graphs and visuals
• First sentences
58
Structuring the report• A meaningful and interesting title.
• The date and author of the report.
• The contents list, if it is a fairly long report.
• A summary of the main point/s of the report
• Body: • logical flow of items • meaningful headings and sub-headings • Visuals
• A conclusion, which could be your recommendations section.
1 Get started using tools like thinking, talking and reading, freewriting, and mindmaps. Basically, brainstorming. Use these tools throughout the rest of your writing process.
3 Do an audience analysis.
2 Determine why you are writing. What do you want to achieve?
4 Start to plan your writing from a mindmap. Organise your thoughts into an outline. What else needs doing? Include a writing process schedule. Add a rough introductory statement and conclusion.
5 Start writing your first draft. Let it flow. Don’t edit. Concentrate on getting your ideas down. Complete your first draft and then take a break from it. Let it breathe. Let your mind work on it unconsciously for a bit.
6 Go back to your first draft. Revise it. Look back at your audience analysis. Remind yourself of your objective. Has it stayed the same? Will you achieve it if you follow the route you are going?
8 Get feedback on your writing. Strengthen your writing through revising into new drafts. Write the introduction and conclusion. Read it aloud to yourself, and or others.
7 Rework the report into stronger drafts. Cut out what you do not need. Add in what’s missing. Scan for correcting grammar and spelling. Do necessary changes.
9 Edit your writing. Put yourself in your readers’ shoes. Make it powerful and easy to read. Check your language, style and tone.
10 The final polish. Make sure your writing looks good and is easy to read. Get someone else to proofread
11 Follow on with design and layout; another proofreading and checking, and distribution.
Adapted from CIVICUS Better Communications and Planning Civil Society Toolkits
The schedule12. Distribution date 29 Nov.
11. Printing22-29 Nov.
10. Final proof reading21-22 Nov.
8. Proof reading6-7 Nov.
2. Work out why and what you are writing7-8 Oct.
9. Design and layout 7-21 Nov.
7. Editing30 Oct. to 7 Nov.
5. Get feedback on early draft 11-16 Oct.
4. Plan your writing – outline and schedule 9-11 Oct.
6. Strengthen drafts 16-30 Oct.
3. Do an audience analysis8-9 Oct.
1. Use your getting started tools – freewriting, mindmaps 1-7 Oct.
Adapted from CIVICUS Better Communications and Planning Civil Society Toolkits
1 Oct. - Start Project
29 Nov Finish project
61
Making the argument
A good recommendation:a precise request/recommendationto a specific authority/audience
4 types of arguments:LegalMoralHuman consequencesSelf-interest
Each report has:An objective!!An audience!!
62
Acknowledgements and Resources• ILGA Europe human rights documentation fund
http://www.ilga-europe.org/europe/funding_capacity_building/funding_opportunities/ilga_europe_human_rights_violations_documentation_funds
• ILGA Europe completed projects and current projects http://www.ilga-europe.org/europe/funding_capacity_building/funding_opportunities/
ilga_europe_human_rights_violations_documentation_funds • HuriTools at HURIDOCS http://www.huridocs.org/tools/overview • Human Rights Tools http://www.humanrightstools.org/
• UKEWLI handbook for monitoring and documenting human rights violations in Africa. Amnesty International Dutch Section, 2000 http://www.amnesty.nl/in_actie_vervolg/spa_downloads#artikel10075
• European handbook on equality data. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/fundamental_rights/pdf/pubst/stud/hb07_en.pdfv
• Spirer & Spirer. Intermediate Data Analysis for Human rights. https://courseworks.columbia.edu/cms/outview/courseenter.cfm?no=INAFU8165_001_2002_3
• Ball, Spirer & Spirer. Making the case. https://courseworks.columbia.edu/cms/outview/courseenter.cfm?no=INAFU8165_001_2002_3
• CIVICUS Better Communications and Planning Civil Society Toolkits http://www.civicus.org/new/civicus_toolkit_project.asp
• Natalie Goldberg. Writing Down the Bones. Page 8. Published by Shambhala, 1986.• HuriSearch www.hurisearch.org . Searches 4500 human rights sites in 77 languages.• Handbook on Observations of Pride Marches by Christine Loudes. ILGA Europe