shale gas and oil in international trade
TRANSCRIPT
Shale Gas And Oil In International Trade
Dr Gary K. Busch
The increased production of oil and gas from the fracturing of shale
formations has been one of the most potent influences in
international relations. It has empowered the economy of the U.S. by
lowering the domestic price of petroleum products and changed the
U.S. industry from an importer to an exporter of petroleum products
in a very short period. It has been the engine for growth in a range
of industries associated with “fracking” and has produced feedstocks
for new chemical, fertiliser and plastics industries. Moreover it
has permitted to U.S. to re-evaluate its stance on its former
dependence on foreign oil producing countries and allowed it to
develop the use of energy as a weapon against its enemies.
Until recently the search for oil and gas reserves has been a very
expensive process of drilling at ever-decreasing depths to find
pools oil trapped below the surface of the earth or seabed. The
exploration for oil and gas has been the search for pockets of oil
and gas trapped below the earth’s surface and drilling a pipe down
to open a passageway for that oil and gas to rise to the surface
where it could be loaded aboard giant tankers, pumped into oil or
gas pipelines, or refrigerated into liquefied natural gas or
liquefied petroleum. The technology concentrated on producing
equipment which could go ever deeper below the surface to reach
these oil and gas pockets. Gradually a substantial part of current
oil recovery has been from deep sea wells.
However, there are other deposits of oil and gas which are not part
of subterranean pools of oil or gas. There are a number of
formations which are "continuous" oil accumulations; i.e. the oil
resource is dispersed throughout a geologic formation rather than
existing as discrete, localized occurrence. There is a substantial
amount of oil and gas trapped in shale below a hard crust of rock
not very far below the surface. In recent years there has been the
development of a technology which can access these shale oil
deposits and deliver the entrapped oil and gas to the surface. These
technologies include “horizontal oil well drilling” and “hydraulic
fractioning or “fracking”. “The first new technology was horizontal
drilling, which allowed one vertical well to tap widely into a whole
layer of oil or gas. The second is hydraulic fracturing, or
"fracking," which involved pumping mixtures of water and chemicals
into shale rock. This high-pressure injection of water and chemicals
breaks up the shale and releases the oil and gas that had been
trapped in the rock. Most fracking is on dry land and do not require
deep sea wells or pumping stations.
There have been massive finds of “continuous” formations of oil and
gas in the continental U.S.
Within a short period of time the US became virtually self-sufficient in oil and natural gas. Rather than build the planned LNGreceiving trains for the import of gas, the U.S. has begun to buildliquefaction plants and trains for the export of natural gas to therest of the world. U.S. energy costs have shrunken dramatically andremain stable. This availability of lower cost gas is creating manynew jobs and attracting industry investments into North America fromacross the globe as energy costs are reduced and feed stocks of avariety of petrochemical derivatives are dramatically lessexpensive. In September, 2012 a large Egyptian construction companyannounced that it would build a new nitrogen fertilizer productionplant in southeast Iowa to supply customers in the U.S. Corn Belt;it said the $1.4 billion plant would be “the first world-scale,natural gas-based fertilizer plant built in the United States innearly 25 years” and would reduce U.S. dependence on importedfertilizers. Royal Dutch Shell announced plans for a $2 billionpetrochemical plant northwest of Pittsburgh, where it can usenatural gas supplies from the state’s enormous Marcellus shaleformation. Many German companies are moving their plants to accessthe U.S. shale gas opportunities.
Several transport industries are switching from petroleum and dieselto gas, both for savings and for reducing the carbon burden on theenvironment. The use of generating clean energy using gas willgreatly reduce the emission of carbon dioxide. It can also improvethe efficiencies of renewable energy sources as a back-up to solarand wind-power stations which stop or slow down when the wind dropsand the sun sets. These developments have already had a major effecton world trade and development.
By 2020, the U.S. is expected to produce more gas than it needs. Theoil and gas companies are making ready more than fifteen new exportshipping terminals, sufficient to export a full third of currentdomestic LNG consumption around the world. More than a half-milliongas wells are operating in the U.S., a 50% increase since 2000,according to the Energy Information Administration In 2000, shalegas was 2 per cent of the U.S. natural gas supply; by 2012, it was37 per cent. EIA says the U.S. has 300 trillion cubic feet of gas inproven reserves and potentially ten times that amount in unprovenreserves, much of which is in shale deposits. By comparison, theU.S. currently consumes about 25 trillion cubic feet of natural gasannually. If current trends continue, EIA estimates, the U.S. willbe producing more gas than it consumes within the next seven years.
Indeed, the U.S. reserves of shale gas are probably a grossunderestimate. Oil companies have found that there are vast
entrapped gas reserves underneath the current shale gas formations.The Utica Gas play lies beneath the huge Marcellus field. TheMarcellus Shale captured public attention when leasing and drillingactivities began pumping billions of dollars into local economies in2004.
Now, just a few years later, the Marcellus Shale is being developedinto one of the world's largest natural gas fields. However, whatgeologists have found shows that the Marcellus is only the firststep in a sequence of natural gas plays. The second step is startingin the Utica Shale which is found below the Marcellus Shale find.
One of the reasons that shale gas and oil development proceeded so
quickly in the U.S. was that there already existed a well-developed
interstate gas and oil pipeline systems which could move the gas
into the national network grid.
While growth in the U.S. fracking business is very positive there
are some unusual characteristics of this form of extraction which
acts as a constraint on its expansion. These wells yield a high
volume of product immediately after drilling but the yields decline
rapidly during the first year and then more slowly over time.
When a new well is drilled it penetrates a rock unit with abundant
gas, sometimes under pressure. These new wells can yield at a very
high rate, but over time - as gas escapes from the well - the
pressure in the formation goes down and the result is a well with a
lower rate of yield
Most lower yield wells produce one to two million cubic feet per day
in the first month. Many wells yield between three and five million
cubic feet per day, but gigantic wells could produce as much as
twenty million cubic feet per day. The more the well yields in the
first month the more valuable it generally will be over time. A
typical well might yield as much as half of its gas in the first
five years of production. Wells might then continue to produce for a
total of twenty to thirty years but at lower and lower production
rates. So it is necessary to keep drilling new wells to keep up the
production levels on the acreage available,
Year InitialProduction
ClosingProduction
Decline fromPrevious Year
Annual Royalties $4/mcfGas 12.5% Share
First 2.0 Mmcf/d 0.70 Mmcf/d 68% $207,605Second 0.70 Mmcf/d 0.36 Mmcf/d 41% $82,037
Third 0.36 Mmcf/d 0.25 Mmcf/d 27% $53,327Forth 0.25 Mmcf/d 0.19 Mmcf/d 24% $38,966Fifth 0.19 Mmcf/d 0.15 Mmcf/d 19% $29,536Sixth 0.15 Mmcf/d 0.12 Mmcf/d 18% $23,428TABLE: Production decline statistics from a hypothetical natural gas well in shale with horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing..
This is known as the “Red Queen Effect. Most oil and gas companies
who drill some of the first wells in a new natural gas area do not
often have a way to deliver their gas to market. To obtain delivery
from the well site to the pipeline they must enter into contracts
for the gas with a natural gas pipeline company. The producing oil
and gas company promises to provide a specific amount of gas per day
and the pipeline company promises to provide transmission capacity.
So if, for example, an oil and gas company plans on drilling fifty
wells during their first year in a new shale play they must then
then contract with a pipeline company who will transmit that gas to
market. One year after these wells are drilled their production rate
may have fallen by 60 to 80%. So, to meet the amount of gas promised
to the pipeline the oil and gas company must drill at least 30 to 40
new wells to make up for the drop in production. At the end of the
second year the company has first year production drops on all of
its new wells and second year production drops on all of the wells
drilled in the first year. This forces the oil and gas company to
keep drilling to keep up with its promise to the pipeline.
That’s why it is called the “Red Queen Effect”. It is named after a
character in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass novel. The
Red Queen lectures Alice: "Now, here, you see, it takes all the
running you can do, to keep in the same place. If you want to get
somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!"
Another fundamental drag on the full utilisation of the fracking
method is that there is an urgent need to have a storage facility
on or near the site so that the gas can be contained before it is
put into the pipeline or sent to a nearby plant and converted into
ethylene and polyethylene for the plastics industry. Without this
storage or conversion process to contain all the gas produced, the
U.S. fracking industry has been burning off (“flaring”) a large
percentage of its production before it ever reaches the pipeline. In
August 2014 the North Dakota Industrial Commission announced that
the August capture percentage was 73 percent with increased daily
volume of gas flared from July to August of 23.5 million cubic feet
per day. Before the improvements the historical high flared percent
was 36 percent in September, 2011. As the retention and intermediate
storage capacity increases the decline in well output is compensated
for by reduced flaring. Once these storage facilities are built they
can be used for the replacement wells without extra as they come on
stream.
In the early days of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing of
shale it was customary practice to allow the well to produce at full
capacity as soon as it was placed on line. This produced rapid
income for the company and helped generate enough funds to build
intermediate storage facilities to reduce flaring. Recent
experiments suggest that throttling the production of a new well
might result in a longer productive lifetime for the well and a
greater total recovery of gas. The theory behind this is that rapid
initial production allows the pore spaces in the shale to deflate
unevenly. Pores near the well collapse first as the gas rapidly
moves to the well and that causes more distant gas to be trapped
within the formation. Slowing the production rate allows the pores
to deflate more evenly and allows an orderly, more efficient and
more complete gas recovery. (see Geology.com. Production and RoyaltyDeclines in a Natural Gas Well Over Time 11/13
The other constraint on the fracking industry is the need for large
and reliable supplies of water. The U.S. is generally well-supplied
with water in most of the areas in which shale extraction takes
place. However, this growth of fracking sites has added to the
general burden on water supplies and is having a negative impact on
farming a human consumption. That is because there are not
sufficient systems in place to clean and reuse the water. It is
wasteful to take good water out of the system when the water-
chemical mixtures used from fracking can relatively easily be
remediated and recycled, using electronic separators or algae
installations to clean and restore the water used. As in most
technologies each further step generates another technology which
fills the needs. The growth of a water recycling process is becoming
an industry on its own and many people are also looking into re-
working existing wells to reclaim the gas not yet removed; much as
stripper wells did for the oil industry.
The impact of this process of fracking oil and gas shale on the
world market has been very strong. The price to the consumer of
shale gas and oil has diminished. It has become more economical to
use this gas as a fuel in trucks, buses and trains, reducing
transport costs for many industries. Singapore has just built a
facility to refuel marine vessels with gas in a whole new bunkering
industry. There is a mass market for cheap energy and the U.S. is
preparing to export gas as well as oil to international markets.
This is a very important development; not only as a revenue-earner
for U.S. suppliers, but also as a method of keeping prices low in
the U.S... If the U.S. doesn’t export its oil and gas the
consequences can be severe. If the U.S. market for shale oil and gas
cannot absorb the full supply then it becomes uneconomic for
producers to keep drilling new wells. However the Red Queen Effect
demands that new wells be drilled. Without these new wells the rapid
fall-off of supply from existing wells will soon make it too
expensive to keep up with new drilling in the face of a diminished
demand and prices will rise. If the U.S. producers can export the
shale oil and gas then the unit price of newly drilled and renewed
oil and gas supplies remains under less domestic pressure for higher
prices.
The political consequences are equally serendipitous. As the Russian
supplies of oil to Europe diminish, either through sanctions,
political pressure or Russian programs of self-injury, there needs
to be a reliable source of substitute energy to make up the
shortfalls Where it used to be economic for gas to be frozen and
shipped as LNG from export trains on specialised freezing vessels to
receiving regasification plants technology has introduced several
important improvements. By freezing gas the volume of the gas
shipped is reduced 600 times in its liquid form. This is an
expensive process; refrigerated ships are expensive and
regasification plants are expensive. Now there are specialised
vessels which compress gas, as opposed to freezing it; when the
pressure is reduced the gas flows through a pipeline. This means
that the receiving country or port doesn’t need such an expensive
cryogenic infrastructure as LNG. It can use compressed gas through a
pipeline flange.
Equally, the vessels needed to carry this gas do not have be
contracted for twenty-five years to a specific project as is true in
most LNG agreements. Ordinary ships can be fitted out to carry
compressed gas. This means that the journey from producer to
consumer does not require vessels moving vast distances under
ballast (without cargo). For example, an LG vessel loads at Woodside
in Australia and delivers its cargo to Louisiana and then sails back
thousands of miles empty to Australia. That is a crazy waste of
money. By removing the need for cryogenics these vessels can deliver
the cargo from one country and then pick up a cargo nearby for
transport to a different buyer. This allows natural gas to be
handled as a spot trade rather than a contracted voyage with long
periods of ballast. There are a number of floating production,
storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels being moored in the world’s
ports to receive gas cargos and which are linked to pipelines. This
will free up vessels, ports and obviate the need for cryogenic
systems.
This is just the beginning of the international spot and contract
business of natural gas and, with foresight, the restrictions on
U.S. exports will be lifted in their entirety soon..