rp1459 v4 - world bank documents and reports

DIRECTORATE FOR ROADS OF VIETNAM

PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT 3

=================

RESETTLEMENT PLAN

VIET NAM ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT PROJECT

(VRAMP)

COMPONENT C: ROAD ASSET IMPROVEMENT

C1: FOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY 39-1

(TRIEU DUONG – HUNG HA)

Prepared by:

HA NOI BRANCH OF INVESTMENT AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION

CONSULTATION COMPANY E.P.C

Phone: (84).46.673.5808 - (84).43.748.0373

Email: [email protected]

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

wb452162

Typewritten Text

RP1459 v4

DIRECTORATE FOR ROADS OF VIETNAM


RESETTLEMENT PLAN VIET NAM ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT PROJECT

(VRAMP)

COMPONENT C: ROAD ASSET IMPROVEMENT

C1: FOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY 39-1

(TRIEU DUONG – HUNG HA)

THE CLIENT


THE CONSULTANT

Hanoi, June - 2013

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 8

1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 10

1.1. THE VIETNAM ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT PROJECT ............................................................. 10

1.2. DESCRIPTION OF SECTION TRIEU DUONG – HUNG HA OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY 39-1 ....... 11

1.3. EFFORTS IN MINIMIZING LAND ACQUISITION IMPACTS. ............................................................ 15

2. LAND ACQUISITION IMPACTS ......................................................................................... 16

2.1. METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 16

2.2. SUMMARY OF PROJECT AFFECTED QUANTITY ......................................................................... 17

2.3. IMPACTS ON LANDS .................................................................................................................. 18

2.4. IMPACTS ON BUILDING AND SUB-ASSETS.................................................................................. 21

2.5. IMPACTS ON CROPS AND TREES ................................................................................................ 25

2.6. IMPACTS ON PUBLIC WORKS ..................................................................................................... 26

2.7. IMPACTS ON WOMEN HEADED HOUSEHOLDS ............................................................................ 27

3. SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILES ........................................................................................... 30

3.1. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT SOCIO-ECONOMIC SITUATION .............................................................. 30

3.2. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF DPS .................................................................................. 31

4. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ENTITLEMENT POLICY ................................................ 40

4.1. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................ 40

4.2. ENTITLEMENT POLICY .............................................................................................................. 45

5. RESETTLEMENT ................................................................................................................... 52

6. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION ...................................................... 52

6.1. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................... 52

6.2. ANALYSIS OF DEMAND ............................................................................................................. 52

6.3. IMPLEMENTATION ISSUE .......................................................................................................... 54

6.4. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ........................................................................................................... 55

6.5. IMPLEMENTATION BUDGET ...................................................................................................... 56

7. CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION, INFPORMATION DISCLOSURE ........... 57

7.1. OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ...................................................................................................... 57

7.2. CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION PROCEDURE .................................................................. 58

7.3. METHOD FOR CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION ................................................................ 58

7.4. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ..................................................................................................... 60

2

7.5. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION RESULTS ................................................................................... 60

8. COMPLAINT AND GRIEVANCES ...................................................................................... 61

9. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................................ 62

9.1. PROVINCIAL PEOPLE’S COMMITTEE (PPC) .............................................................................. 62

9.2. THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT (PMU3) ............................................................................ 63

9.3. DISTRICT PEOPLE’S COMMITTEE ............................................................................................. 64

9.4. DISTRICT COMPENSATION ASSISTANT AND RESETTLEMENT COMMITTEES (DCRC) ................ 64

9.5. COMMUNE PEOPLE'S COMMITTEES .......................................................................................... 65

9.6. EXTERNAL MONITORING AGENCY ........................................................................................... 65

10. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT ............................................................................. 67

11. MONITORING AND EVALUATION ................................................................................... 70

11.1. INTERNAL RESETTLEMENT MONITORING................................................................................. 70

11.2. EXTERNAL RESETTLEMENT MONITORING ............................................................................... 70

12. COST AND BUDGET .............................................................................................................. 72

12.1. PRINCIPLES .............................................................................................................................. 72

12.2. REPLACEMENT COST SURVEY ................................................................................................. 73

12.3. PROPOSED COMPENSATION UNIT PRICES .................................................................................. 74

12.4. COST ESTIMATES ..................................................................................................................... 75

3

List of tables

Table 1: Names of project communes, districts ................................................................................. 13

Table 2: Summary of Land Acquisition Impacts................................................................................ 17

Table 3: Summary of Land acquisition by Location, Category and Affected households ................. 18

Table 4: No. of HHs with Affected Residential Land (in rural area with remaining area plot less than

100 m2 and in urban area with remaining area plot less than 80 m2) ................................................ 18

Table 5: Number of Affected household by Severity of Impact of Land Acquisition ....................... 19

Table 6: Average Land Holdings and Severity of Land Acquisition Impacts ................................... 20

Table 7: Summary of Impacts on Houses ........................................................................................... 21

Table 8: Affected Houses by Grade ................................................................................................... 21

Table 9: Fully affected houses and residential land by location......................................................... 22

Table 10: Impacts on shops ................................................................................................................ 23

Table 11: Affected Secondary Structures ........................................................................................... 24

Table 12: Impacts on Trees (No. of Trees) ......................................................................................... 25

Table 13: Impacts on crops ................................................................................................................. 26

Table 14: The public land and public works affected by the project ................................................. 26

Table 15: Land acquisition impacts to Households Headed by Women ............................................ 28

Table 16: Average Land Holdings and Severity of Land Acquisition Impacts with Households

Headed by Women ............................................................................................................................. 29

Table 17: Demographic Characteristics at Project Communes/Districts ........................................... 30

Table 18: Health establishments, beds and staffs by state management ............................................ 31

Table 19: Socio-economic survey scale ............................................................................................. 31

Table 20: Household size ................................................................................................................... 32

Table 21: Gender distribution of HH Member in affected communes ............................................... 33

Table 22: Education level of Household members ............................................................................. 33

Table 23: Income sources, according to communes/districts (%) ...................................................... 35

Table 24: HH income according to Project locations ( /month) ......................................................... 36

Table 25: Classification of households by income ............................................................................. 37

Table 26: Facilities of affected households ........................................................................................ 38

Table 27: House types of displaced people ........................................................................................ 38

Table 28: Water Source for Using of Affected Households ............................................................... 39

Table 29: Main gaps between compensation, assistance and resettlement policies of Government’s

and World Bank’s and proposed policies for project ......................................................................... 43

Table 30: Entitlement Matrix ............................................................................................................. 47

Table 31: Preferences of the households to the income restoration activities .................................... 53

Table 32: Steps proposed for the implementation phase of income restoration ................................. 55

Table 33: Implementation Schedule for the RP ................................................................................. 69

Table 34: Land compensation unit prices proposed for project ......................................................... 74

Table 35: Cost estimate for compensation and resettlement based on the replacement values ......... 75

Table 35. 1: Breakdown by commune ................................................................................................ 78

4

Table 35. 2: Compensation for buildings ........................................................................................... 79

Table 35. 3: Compensation for substructures ..................................................................................... 81

Table 35. 4: Compensation for trees ................................................................................................... 85

Table 35. 5: Compensation for crops.................................................................................................. 92

Table 35. 6: Compensation for public works ..................................................................................... 93

Table 35. 7: Allowances ..................................................................................................................... 98

Table 35. 8: External monitoring cost .............................................................................................. 107

Table 36: Meetings with Other Stakeholder ..................................................................................... 122

Table 37: Consultation on income restoration measures .................................................................. 123

Table 38: Meetings for a rapid survey in the replacement values .................................................... 124

Figures

Figure 1: Location of Project .............................................................................................................. 12

Figure 2: Map of the Project ............................................................................................................... 13

Figure 3: A typical cross section in non-residential area.................................................................... 16

Figure 4: A typical cross section in a residential area ........................................................................ 16

Figure 5: Some photos about public consultation and participation ................................................ 128

Annexes

ANNEX 1: THE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SURVEY OF AFFECTED

ASSETS ............................................................................................................................................ 108

ANNEX 2: PROJECT INFORMATION BOOKLET (PIB) ............................................................ 118

ANNEX 3: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AND PICTURES OF CONSULTATION MEETINGS .. 122

ANNEX 4: DETAILED RESULTS SURVEY ON THE SUBSTITUTION COST IN EACH

COMMUNE ..................................................................................................................................... 129

5

EXCHANGE RATE

(On January 2013)

Currency Unit - Vietnamese Dong (VND)

- United States Dollars ($)

$1.00 = VND21,000

ABBREVIATION

DCRC District Compensation Assistant Resettlement Committee

DMS Detailed Measurement Survey

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

EMP Environmental Management Plan

GOV Government of Viet Nam

HH Household

LURC Land Use Right Certificate

MOT Ministry of Transport

NH National Highway

RNIP Road Network Improvement Project

OP Operational Policy

PC Public Consultation

PCC Provincial Compensation Committee

PDOT Provincial Department of Transport

PID1 Project Implementation Division 1

PMU3 Project Management Unit No 3

PPC Provincial People’s Committee

RP Resettlement Plan

ROW Right-of-way

USD or $ United States Dollars

VND Vietnamese Dong

WB World Bank (including IDA)

6

GLOSSARY

Displaced person(s) People, households, or legal entities affected by project related changes in

use of land, water, natural resources, or income losses. Impact may be full

or partial, permanent or temporary physical displacement (relocation, loss

of residential land or loss of shelter) and/or economic displacement (loss of

land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means for livelihood)

resulting from (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary

restriction on land use.

Compensation Payment in cash or kind to which the affected people are entitled in order

to replace the lost asset, resource or income.

Cut-off date The Date that the project is approved and publishes broadly by the District

People’s Committee to local communities and affected people. Any

persons moving into the project area after the cut-off date will not be

entitled to compensation and assistance under the project..

Eligibility Criteria Basis used in the Project for determining if a person or entity is entitled to

be compensated or assisted in relation to land acquisition and resettlement

impacts from the Project.

Encroachers People who move into the project area after the cut-off date and are

therefore not eligible for compensation or other rehabilitation measures

provided by the project or persons who have trespassed government land,

adjacent to his/her own land or asset, to which he/she is not entitled, by

deriving his/her livelihood there. Such act is called “Encroachment.”

Entitlement Entitlement means the range of measures comprising compensation in cash

or kind, relocation cost, income rehabilitation assistance, transfer

assistance, income substitution, and business restoration which are due to

APs, depending on the type and degree nature of their losses, to restore

their social and economic base.

Household Household means all persons living and eating together as a single-family

unit and eating from the same kitchen whether or not related to each other.

The census used this definition and the data generated by the census forms

the basis for identifying the household unit.

7

Income restoration Income restoration means re-establishing income sources and livelihoods

of DPs.

Involuntary

Resettlement

Any resettlement, which does not involve willingness of the persons being

adversely affected, but are forced through an instrument of law.

Resettlement is considered involuntary when displaced individuals or

communities do not have the right to refuse land acquisition that result in

displacement.

Land acquisition Land acquisition means the process whereby a person is compelled by a

public agency to alienate all or part of the land s/he owns or possesses, to

the ownership and possession of that agency, for public purposes in return

for fair compensation.

Severely affected Households affected by the project and (a) The affected land is 20% of

total land or more than that and 10% for vulnerable group, and/or (b) have

to resettle.

Vulnerable groups Special target groups that are likely affected by inadequate impacts or at

risk of further impoverished by effects of resettlement, specifically they

include: (i) households headed by female with dependents, (ii) households

with persons with disabilities, (iii) households living below the poverty

line, (iv) households, children and elderly people without land and other

methods of support, (v) minority groups.

Replacement Cost Replacement of loss assets with assets that have similar value (i.e. lands

with similar production potential and location advantages) or cash

compensation that includes: (i) fair market value; (ii) transaction costs, (iii)

interest accrued, (iv) transitional and restoration costs, and (v) other

applicable payments. In case of structures, replacement cost refers to

current cost of materials (no depreciation) and labour cost. When national

laws do not meet the standard of compensation at full replacement cost,

compensation under national law is supplemented by additional measures

necessary to meet the replacement cost standards.

8

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Socialist Republic of Viet Nam is preparing Viet Nam Road Asset Program (VRAMP)

proposed to a credit of the World Bank. The proposed Project Development Objective (PDO) is to

cultivate sustainable road asset management practices by developing a national road asset

management system, to build the capacity of Vietnam's road agencies to manage road assets, and to

demonstrate sustainable maintenance practices on selected road sections. The proposed project has 4

components: (i) Road Asset Management System Development; (ii) Road Asset Preservation; (iii)

Road Asset Improvement; and (iv) Institutional Strengthening Program. Under component C – Road

Asset Improvement, land acquisition is required to upgrade/widen road, bridges in national

highways No 39, 39-1, 38 and 38B.

This Resettlement Plan (RP) is prepared for a Section Trieu Duong – Hung Ha of National

Highway 39-1. This section mainly followed with the existing one and passing through the paddy

fields of Hung Nhan and Hung Ha towns and end at Km 64+000 in Minh Tan commune. A segment

from Km 47+900 to 51+000 (by pass in Hung Nhan town) would be newly developed. Efforts have

been made during the design process to minimize the social adverse impacts (e.g. land acquisition,

resettlement) to households, collective and public facilities. The team also conducted socioeconomic

survey in Quarter 1, 2013 with a sample of 30 % the project affected HH (including 20% samples of

the severely affected HH) and based on the ROW identified by the technical engineers and marked

on cadastral maps available at the affected communes. In addition, the resettlement consultant team

for the PMU3 also carried out in depth interview with many leaders and people of the affected

communes, districts on the socioeconomic conditions of commune, districts and to obtain further

detailed information to help for planning the livelihood development programs through resettlement

plan. Findings of the survey have been incorporated in the present version of Resettlement Plan.

This section (Trieu Duong – Hung Ha) of National Highway 39-1 will affect 582 HHs, of which:

There are 362 household are affected on residential land with a total area of 13,447 m2.

There are 8 households would be affected on garden land with a total area of 577m2.

There are 229 households would be affected on productive land with a total area of 20,258 m2.

There are 86 households would be affected with more than 10 % of the productive land.

There is 7 households would be fully affected on house and with total area of 322 m2.

There are 82 households would be fully affected on residential land but only 7 households

would be fully affected on house and with a house area of 322m2. Others are with no house

on residential land.

There would be 20 households partially affected on houses with a total area of 203 m2.

There are public works and Collective assets would be also affected including annual crop

land and irrigation land of communes, power substation, power poles etc.

9

This Resettlement Plan is prepared based on the project policy framework reflecting both

existing Vietnamese laws and OP 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement of the Work Bank. All Displaced

People (DPs) will be compensated for their losses at replacement cost and provided with other

assistance and rehabilitation measures to assist them to improve, or at least maintain, their pre-

project living standards and income earning capacity. The main roles of the RP implementation will

be by the PPCs of the Project Province, DONRE, DOF, DOC of the provinces, the district PCs, the

relevant departments of the districts and commune authorities. Some local NGO such as women

union, farmer association, father front etc. will also be involved in implementing the RP in each

project province.

According to World Bank guidelines and the Decrees of the GOV on land acquisition,

compensation, assistance and resettlement, DPs will be adequately informed and consulted to enable

their active participation in the planning and implementation of RP. From January to March-2013,

series of meetings were held with the Provincial Departments, the District People’s Committees,

Leaders and members of affected commune officials, district compensation and Site Clearance

committees, key district departments (environment and land management, agriculture, industry and

commerce, labour, invalids and social affairs), farmer’s associations, vocational training centres,

agricultural extension centres, local banks or credit/loan institutions etc. Members from the Viet

Nam Women’s Unions at the district level were also consulted specifically on economic restoration

programs for the affected women and with regard to their capacity in planning and implementing

economic restoration programs as well as gender issues related to the project development. Many

meetings were also held with the DPs before the resettlement team carries out for the SES and IOL

in each affected commune. Final draft of this RP will be disclosed at project sites, VDIC of the

World Bank office in Hanoi, InfoShop in Washington D.C.

The RP implementation will include both internal and external monitoring and evaluation. The

PMU3 and the local authorities at all levels are responsible for the internal monitoring and

supervision of the RP for the project through the District and Provincial Compensation Committees.

The findings of the internal supervision and monitoring will be recorded in a quarterly report to be

submitted to the Provincial and District PCs and MOT. An independent agency has been retained to

carry out external monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the RP. External monitoring

and evaluation involves verification of the internal supervision and monitoring quarterly reports and

20% sampling of relevant DPs every six (6) months.

The rapid Replacement Cost Survey for this RP was carried out in early 2013. These costs are

used for the purpose of preparing cost estimates for the RP. During RP implementation, the cost will

be updated on a regular basis through the conduct of replacement cost survey by a qualified and

legal appraiser and will be reviewed and approved by the PCs of the Project Provinces to ensure that

payments to DPs will be at replacement cost at the time of compensation. The total cost is estimated

with VND126.075.209.505 (equal to $6.003.58) including (i) compensation for the affected

properties (land and asset on land); (ii) Assistance as per the policy framework; (iii) implementation

cost; and (iv) contingency of 35 % from the total cost of above mentioned items.

10

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. The Vietnam Road Asset Management Project

The Socialist Republic of Viet Nam is preparing Viet Nam Road Asset Management Project

(VRAMP) proposed to a credit of the World Bank. The proposed Project Development Objective

(PDO) is to cultivate sustainable road asset management practices by developing a national road

asset management system, to build the capacity of Vietnam's road agencies to manage road assets,

and to demonstrate sustainable maintenance practices on selected road sections. The proposed

project has 4 components:

Component A: Road Asset Management System (RAMS) Development. This component

will finance the development of comprehensive Road Asset Management System (RAMS).

This activity will complement and augment previous and ongoing support activities in the

sector from the multiple development partners including the World Bank, the Asian

Development Bank, and the Japan International Cooperation Agency. Specifically, this

component will consist of four activities; (i) establishment of the road database framework;

(ii) initial data collection for the entire national highway network followed by a rolling

update of one-third of the network in each subsequent year of the project; (iii) development

of a Road Asset Management System compatible with the already established sub-systems;

and (iv) inception of short-, medium-, and long-term road asset management planning for

national road network maintenance and improvements.

Component B: Road Asset Preservation. This component will support a means of

enhancing an effective maintenance method through performance-based contracts (PBCs) in

addition to the traditional road asset preservation requirements. It will finance technical

assistance on establishing PBC legal framework, formulating standard bidding documents

with the past lessons, and a supervision manual (for both engineering and environmental

supervision); preservation of high priority sections in the DRVN road network through both

traditional input-based method (271 km) and PBC (273 km); a study to compare alternative

maintenance strategies, which lead to practical policy advice on the most effective, long-

term preservation strategy for Vietnam.

Component C: Road Asset Improvement. This component will finance road improvement

activities for high priority sections (55 km) in the DRVN road network. It will include civil

works, supervision activities, and land acquisition and resettlement (financed by the GoV).

Civil works will include widening of nine bridges over 25 m length which are currently

causing the bottlenecks within the network.

Component D: Institutional Strengthening Program. This component will support well

targeted activities to build the capacity of Vietnam’s road agencies to enable better planning,

budgeting, constructing, and monitoring of road assets. Specific component activities will

11

include: (i) renovation of the Directorate for Roads of Vietnam’s (DRVN) human resource

management involved in the planning, budgeting, management, and operation of the new

information management system; (ii) improvement in management, transparency, and

monitoring of the recently established Road Maintenance Fund (RMF) by institutionalizing

and strengthening its management; (iii) development of standard drawings for infrastructure

facilities to increase consistency and quality control of pre-fabricated parts, and to expedite

design and construction processes; as well as (iv) technical and financial audits of project

implementation.

Among above components, the component C- Road Asset Improvement would require land

acquisition for the project construction, other components would not require land acquisition.

This RP is prepared for a Section of Trieu Duong-Hung Ha of the National Highway 39-1 of

VRAMP. This RP is prepared based on the project policy framework reflecting both existing

Vietnamese laws and OP 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement of the Work Bank.

1.2. Description of section Trieu Duong – Hung Ha of the National Highway 39-1

This section mainly followed the existing one and passed through the paddy fields of Hung Nhan

and Hung Ha towns and end at Km 64+000 in Minh Tan commune. A segment from Km 47+900 to

51+000 (by-pass in Hung Nhan town) would be newly developed. A map of the project route is

shown as figure 1-2 below.

12

Figure 1: Location of Project

13

Figure 2: Map of the Project

The names of the communes, districts and provinces which the project would be developed as

described as in table 1 below.

Table 1: Names of project communes, districts

# Province/

District Commune

Distance in

Commune

Distance

(m) ROW Area (W=m) Note

I Hung Yen

I.1 Tien Lu 1. Thien Phien 42+628-43+300 672 18 Roads and

Bridge

II Thai Binh

II.1 Hung Ha 2. Tan Le 43+950-45+200 1,200 16.5 Roads and

Bridge

14

# Province/

District Commune

Distance in

Commune

Distance

(m) ROW Area (W=m) Note

3. Hung Nhan

town 45+200-48+000 2,800 18.0; 16.5 and 14.5

Roads and

intersections

4. Tan Hoa 48+000-48+300 300 16.5 Roads

5. Lien Hiep 48+300-53+000 4,700 16.5 Roads and

intersections

6. Phuc Khanh 53+000-54+700 1,700 16.5 Roads

7. Thai Phuong 54+700-55+600 900 16.5 Roads

8. Hung Ha town 55+600-58+600 3,000 16.5 and 18.0 Roads

9. Minh Khai 58+600-60+500 1,900 16.5 and 18.0 Roads

10. Hong Linh 60+500-62+800 2,300 16.5 and 18.0 Roads

II.2 Dong Hung 11. Minh Tan 62+800-64+000 1,200 16.5 Roads

The Decision 2087/QD-GTVT dated 04 July 2002 of Ministry of Transport, which approved for

the investment project of National Highway 39 from Km 42+655 to Km 74+450 and from Km

81+600 to Km 108+381 (Trieu Duong-Cang Diem Bridge section) Diem Dien Port includ the main

points as below:

Standard of type 3 in a plain area:

o The width of 12/7 m

o A width need for reinforcement is 2m x 2 m (as the same standard of the road surface)

o Earth strip along the road is 0.5 m each side.

o Upgrading for the Sections passing in the 6 towns to type 1 and remained the same standard

as existing one in 4 towns.

o Minimum radius is Rmin=250 m and a special case could be with Rcc=13 m.

o The drainage system would be designed with the capacity of H30-XB80 and with the same

width of the road surface.

o The safety notices will be applied with 22 TCVN 237-97 of the Ministry of Transport.

The Decision 344/QD-BGTVT dated 19 February 2009 of the Ministry of Transport, approved

for the investment project of the National Highway 39-1 (section Trieu Duong- Diem Dien in Thai

Binh Province) has the main points as below:

Standard of type 3 in a plain area (TCVN4054:2005). Some special cases could be exempted.

The width of 12/7 m (Bn/Bm)

A width need for reinforcement is 2m x 2 m (as the same standard of the road surface)

15

Earth strip along the road is 0.5 m each side. Section passing through the towns would be

with 18/14 (Bn/Bm). The drainage culverts are with a diameter of minimum 750 mm.

Upgrading for the Sections passing in the 6 towns to type 1 and remained the same standard

as existing one in 4 towns.

Minimum radius is Rmin=250 m and a special case could be with Rcc=13 m.

The Nai Bridge will be at Km 48+217 and with B=2.5M + 4.2 M + 2.5 M and H= 5.93 M.

Le Bridge will be at Km 50+120 with a length of 9.36 m and with single steel spans

The safety notices will be applied with 22 TCVN 237-01.

The PMU3PMU3 has submitted to the Ministry of Transport a letter 02/TTr-BQLDA 2 dated 03

January 2012 with the main proposals as below:

Applied with a standard TCVN 4054-2005 (Vtk=80 km/hr), referenced with a standard TCVN

4054-1998 in case required.

For normal case the width of the road base would be 12 m and the width of the surface is 11

m. A strip each side is 0.5 m. The section passing through towns would be with a base of

14.5 to 18 wide and surface of 12 to 14 m wide and a sidewalk of from 0 - 2 m each side.

Two new bridges are Le and Nai at Km 48+251.22 and at Km 48+600 respectively.

There are two intersection and the safety notices will be applied with 22 TCVN 237-01.

A starting point is at about Km 42+714.26 and ending point is at Km 64. Total length is 19.7 km.

The width of the road base through non-town area is 12.0 am and the width for the road

surface is 2x3.5 m =7.0 m. Reinforced for the road base with 2x2.0 m = 4.0 m and earth base

of 2 x 0.5 m= 1.0 m. The sidewalk of (1-2) x 2m = 2.0 to 4.0 m.

1.3. Efforts in minimizing land acquisition impacts.

The Feasibility Studies demonstrated that each sub-project will be economically, socially and

environmentally feasible. Any adverse environmental or social impacts identified at the Feasibility

Stage will be adequately managed within the scope of the Resettlement Plan and the Environmental

Management Plan (EMP).

Study on the route map and site survey was conducted to make sure that the project route will be

designed to minimize the social adverse impacts and especially minimize impacts resettlement to the

individual households and to the collectives and republic works.

A cross section in a non-residential area and residential area is modified to minimize for the land

acquisition and resettlement impacts and shown as in figure 3 and 4.

16

Figure 3: A typical cross section in non-residential area

12.00

Figure 4: A typical cross section in a residential area

14.50 - 18.00

2. LAND ACQUISITION IMPACTS

2.1. Methodology

The survey on the impact of land acquisition and other affected properties (IOL) were carried

out on where all land and non-land assets including businesses income-generating activities located

inside the acquired land. The severity of impact on the affected assets and the severity of impact on

the livelihood and productive capacity of households are also determined. Information on the

number of affected households (individuals and collectives and public assets); members of the

affected households, sources of livelihood, income level, and tenure status are gathered.

The census and IOL of affected persons and affected assets for RP were done based the

commune cadastral map analysis with the verification of commune authorities and DONRE of each

project province. Inventory of Losses (IOL) were done for all affected communes. The land and

assets identified are subject to verification during detailed measurement survey (DMS) by the

17

district compensation and site clearance Committees following the phase of detailed design and RP

implementation phases. Questionnaire combined for socioeconomic survey, IOL and consultation is

attached as Annex 1 to this report.

The project goes through 11 communes/towns of Hung Ha and Dong Hung districts of Thai

Binh Province and Tien Lu district of Hung Yen Province. Survey on land acquisition by the project

is based on the route which defined by the technical team, the selected route is marked on cadastral

maps which available at the affected districts and affected communes within the width of the

corridor which described as in a Chapter of the project description (Chapter 1). The IOL including

land and all kinds of assets on land such as building, substructures, crop and trees etc. and identified

the affected households (affected family and collective or public works). The IOL is surveyed by the

EPC Branch in Ha Noi for the PMU3 in Q1, 2013.

2.2. Summary of Project Affected Quantity

The results of IOL were obtained and analysed are shown as in Tables 2 as follows:

Table 2: Summary of Land Acquisition Impacts

Main impacts Unit Affected quantity

1. Affected households: households 582

In which:

+ Households whose residential lands are affected households 362

+ Households whose agricultural lands are affected households 229

2. Affected area 45,465

Of which:

+ residential land m2 13,447

+ agricultural land m2 20,258

+ other land m2 11,760

3. Number of affected persons Persons 2,328

4. Number of households to relocate, resettle households 7

5. Area of house affected m2 322

6. Number of households whose agricultural land is

seriously affected (20% or more and 10% for

vulnerable group).

households 86

7. Number of vulnerable households households 82

18

2.3. Impacts on lands

Summary of Land acquisition by Location, Category and Affected households present in table 3

below.

Table 3: Summary of Land acquisition by Location, Category and Affected households

District Commune Unit Urban

land Rural

land Annual

crop land Garden

land Aquaculture

land Public

land

Hung

Ha

Tan Le HH - 44 11 - - -

Area - 1,278 415 - - -

Hung Nhan

town

HH 39 29 56 3 - -

Area 1,420 1,247 6,109 70 - -

Lien Hiep HH - 94 96 - - -

Area - 4,390 11,764 - - -

Phuc Khanh HH - 47 - 3 4 -

Area - 1,099 - 148 192 -

Thai Phuong HH - - 12 - - -

Area - - 449 - - -

Hung Ha

town

HH - 22 - - - -

Area - 802 - - - -

Hong Linh HH - 28 1 1 - -

Area - 1,150 152 61 - -

Minh Khai HH - 54 42 - - -

Area - 709 601 - - -

Tan Hoa HH - 7 - 1 - -

Area - 1,353 - 298 - -

Total HH 39 325 218 8 4 -

Area 1,420 12,028 19,489 577 192 -

Table 4 below shows the results of survey on the residential plots with remaining areas less than

100 m2 in the rural area and less than 80 m2 in urban area.

Table 4: No. of HHs with Affected Residential Land (in rural area with remaining area plot

less than 100 m2 and in urban area with remaining area plot less than 80 m2)

District Commune

Number of Affected HHs in

rural area with remaining area

of plot less than 100 m2


urban area with remaining

area of plot less than 80 m2

HH Total area

(m2)

Affected

area (m2)

HH Total

area (m2)

Affected

area (m2)

Hung

Ha

Tan Le 6 507 73

Hung Nhan town - - 15 1,279.3 360.3

Lien Hiep 9 750 209

19

District Commune


rural area with remaining area

of plot less than 100 m2


urban area with remaining

area of plot less than 80 m2

HH Total area

(m2)

Affected

area (m2)

HH Total

area (m2)

Affected

area (m2)

Phuc Khanh 3 113 25

Thai Phuong - -

Hung Ha town - - 2 144.2 15.0

Hong Linh 3 254 97

Minh Khai 7 469 34

Tan Hoa

Total 28 2,092 438 17 1,423.5 375.3

Table 5 shows that, out of 229 affected households, 143 households would be affected on less

than 20% of their total agricultural land holding, the remaining households (86 HHs) would be

acquired from or more than 20% of their agricultural land.

Table 5: Number of Affected household by Severity of Impact of Land Acquisition

District Commune

Productive land Residential land

<20% 20%–

30%

Above

30%–

50%

Above

50%–

70%

>70% Total Fully Partially Total

Hung

Ha

Tan Le 6 5 0 0 0 11 11 33 44

Hung Nhan

town 33 15 3 2 5 58 18 48 66

Lien Hiep 50 26 14 3 3 96 18 76 94

Phuc Khanh 2 3 1 0 1 7 10 37 47

Thai Phuong 11 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 0

Hung Ha

town 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 17 22

Hong Linh 2 0 0 0 0 2 6 22 28

Minh Khai 39 3 0 0 0 42 13 41 54

Tan Hoa 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 6 7

Grand total 143 53 18 6 9 229 82 280 362

Table 6 below shows that the rates of land areas to be acquired for all types of land are low

compared to the total areas which the households are holding.

20

Table 6: Average Land Holdings and Severity of Land Acquisition Impacts

Commune Index

Available

annual crop

land

Affected

annual

crop land

Available

garden

land

Affected

garden

land

Available

aquaculture

land

Affected

aquaculture

land

Residential

land

Affected

residential

land

Tan Le HH 11 11 - - - - 44 44

Average area 689.5 37.7 - - - - 263.3 29.0

Hung Nhan town HH 56 56 3 3 - - 66 66

Average area 1,065.0 109.1 215.3 23.3 - - 248.0 40.4

Lien Hiep HH 96 96 - - - - 94 94

Average area 1,113.7 122.5 - - - - 251.9 46.7

Phuc Khanh HH - - 3 3 4 4 47 47

Average area - - 218.7 49.3 134.3 48.0 247.9 23.4

Thai Phuong HH 12 12 - - - - - -

Average area 1,520.0 37.4 - - - - - -

Hung Ha town HH - - - - - - 22.0 22.0

Average area - - - - - - 212.5 36.5

Hong Linh HH 1 1 1 1 - - 28 28

Average area 1,800.0 152.0 1,500.0 61.1 - - 238.6 41.1

Minh Khai HH 42 42 - - - - 54 54

Average area 1,483.3 14.3 - - - - 189.6 13.1

Tan Hoa HH - - 1 1 - - 7 7

Average area - - 500.0 298.0 - - 452.3 193.2

Total HH 218 218 8 8 4 4 362 362

Average area 1,176.5 89.4 412.8 72.1 134.3 48.0 243.2 37.1

21

2.4. Impacts on building and sub-assets

There are 7 households who would be fully affected on house and with total affected area of

322.3 m2 and there are 20 households who would be partially affected on houses with a total

affected area of 202.8 m2. Therefore, most of the households would be compensated by cash for

their partly affected area of the houses.

Table 7: Summary of Impacts on Houses

District Commune Fully affected Partially affected

Total affected

houses

HH Area (m2) HH Area (m2) HH Area (m2)

Hung

Ha

Tan Le 1 21.3 1 12.5 2 33.8

Hung Nhan town 3 129.0 2 22.6 5 151.6

Lien Hiep 1 82.0 13 107.5 14 189.5

Phuc Khanh - - - - - -

Thai Phuong - - - - - -

Hung Ha town 1 35.0 - - 1 35.0

Hong Linh - - - - - -

Minh Khai - - 1 8.9 1 8.9

Tan Hoa 1 55.0 3 51.3 4 106.3

Grand total 7 322.3 20 202.8 27 525.1

Table 8 analysed the categories of potential affected houses based on the standards of Viet Nam

(Classes 1,2,3,4 and temporary houses). Table 9 describes the households who would fully affected

houses and residential land by location. Table 10 describes the households who would be affected

on shops (independent shops and shop in living houses). There are 27 households who have their

shops affected and they are in Hong Linh, Minh Khai and Tan Hoa communes.

Table 11 describes the substructures that would be affected by the project such as kitchen,

fence, yards etc.

Table 8: Affected Houses by Grade

District Commune

HH and

area

affected

Quantity

House by Grade

Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Wooden

house

Temporary

house

Hung

Ha

Tan Le HH 2 0 0 0 2 0 0

Area (m2) 33.8 0 0 0 33.8 0 0

Hung Nhan

town

HH 5 0 0 0 5 0 0

Area (m2) 151.6 0 0 0 151.6 0 0

Lien Hiep HH 14 0 3 1 11 0 0

Area (m2) 189.5 0 26.7 82 80.8 0 0

22

District Commune

HH and

area

affected

Quantity

House by Grade

Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Wooden

house

Temporary

house

Phuc Khanh HH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Area (m2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Thai

Phuong

HH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Area (m2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hung Ha

town

HH 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

Area (m2) 35 0 0 0 35 0 0

Hong Linh HH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Area (m2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Minh Khai HH 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

Area (m2) 8.9 0 0 0 8.9 0 0

Tan Hoa HH 4 0 1 2 1 0 0

Area (m2) 106.3 0 55 34.3 17 0 0

Total HH 27 0 4 3 21 0 0

Area (m2) 525.05 0 81.7 116.3 327.05 0 0

Note: A household in Lien Hiep commune has two affected houses.

Table 9: Fully affected houses and residential land by location

Locality No. of

affected

houses

Area of

affected

house

(m2)

House on

residential land

House on non-

residential land Residential land

non-affected

house(HH) District Commune HH Area

(m2)

HH Area

(m2)

Hung Ha

Tan Le 2 33.8 2 33.8 - - 42

Hung Nhan

town 5 151.6 5 151.6 - - 61

Lien Hiep 14 189.5 14 189.5 - - 80

Phuc Khanh - - - - - - 47

Thai Phuong - - - - - - -

Hung Ha

town 1 35.0 1 35.0 - - 21

Hong Linh - - - - - - 28

Minh Khai 1 8.9 1 8.9 - - 53

Tan Hoa 4 106.3 4 106.3 - - 3

Total 27 525.1 27 525.1 - - 335

23

Table 10: Impacts on shops

District Commune

Total number of

HH affected

stores/shops

Number of

affected

stores/shops inside

house

Number of affected

stores/shops outside

house

Hung

Ha

Tan Le 6 5 1

Hung Nhan town 1 0 1

Lien Hiep 2 0 2

Phuc Khanh 0 0 0

Thai Phuong 0 0 0

Hung Ha town 5 5 0

Hong Linh 11 8 3

Minh Khai 1 1 0

Tan Hoa 1 1 0

Grand total 27 20 7

24

Table 11: Affected Secondary Structures

District Commune Unit

Affected

Kitchen

outside

house

(m2)

Affected

Breeding

facilities

(m2)

Affected

Power

meter

(piece)

Affected

Fence

(m2)

Affected

Gate

(m2)

Affected

Toilet

(m2)

Affected

Well

(Unit)

Affected

Water

tank

(m3)

Affected

Yard

(m3)

Affected

Fish

pond

(m3)

Hung Ha

Tan Le HH - - - - 4 - 1 - 40 -

Quantity - - - - 22 - 1 - 801 -

Hung Nhan

town

HH 3 - 1 1 6 - 3 - 26 1

Quantity 60 - 1 30 42 - 3 - 444 40

Lien Hiep HH 2 1 - 6 32 - 1 - 59 -

Quantity 30 30 - 145 137 - 1 - 1,509 -

Phuc Khanh HH 1 1 - 5 12 - - - 31 2

Quantity 10 20 - 149 109 - - - 449 200

Hung Ha

town

HH - - - - 7 - 1 - 18 -

Quantity - - - - 38 - 1 - 329 -

Hong Linh HH 1 - - - 5 - - 1 27 -

Quantity 20 - - - 32 - - 1 568 -

Minh Khai HH - - - - 5 - - - 49 -

Quantity - - - - 30 - - - 520 -

Tan Hoa HH 6 1 - 4 4 2 1 2 7 1

Quantity 103 10 - 300 31 15 1 20 275 298

Total HH 13 3 1 16 75 2 7 3 257 4

Quantity 223 60 1 624 441 15 7 21 4,895 538

25

2.5. Impacts on crops and trees

Tables 12 and 13 show the results of IOL on the trees and crops to be affected by the project.

Table 12: Impacts on Trees (No. of Trees)

Commune Unit

Lo

ng

an

Lit

chi

Ja

ck f

ruit

“D

oi”

Ma

ng

o

“N

a”

Gu

av

a

Ba

na

na

Gra

pef

ruit

“X

oa

n”

“B

an

g”

Ver

du

re

Oth

er T

imb

er

“S

i”

“L

oc

vu

ng”

MM

ilk

woo

d p

ine

Pea

ch

Oth

er t

rees

Tan Le HH 14 - 1 - 1 - 3 - 1 - 2 3 - 1 1 - - -

Quantity 36 - 1 - 2 - 5 - 5 - 3 21 - 1 3 - - -

Hung Nhan

town

HH 12 - - 1 2 - - 2 3 1 1 2 - 2 - - -

Quantity 21 - - 1 3 - - 30 5 1 1 6 - 6 - - -

Lien Hiep HH 32 6 3 1 6 1 3 3 3 4 6 4 1 - - 1 - 1

Quantity 62 12 5 1 8 3 7 21 4 4 9 6 1 - - 1 - 1

Phuc Khanh HH 15 3 1 - 4 - - 8 - 3 7 6 - 6 3 - 1 -

Quantity 21 4 1 - 4 - - 80 - 18 12 16 - 8 5 - 1 -

Hung Ha town HH 10 - - 1 1 1 - 2 1 - 1 - - - - - -

Quantity 19 - - 1 2 3 - 11 1 - 1 - - - - - -

Hong Linh HH 8 2 1 - 3 1 1 2 - - 3 2 - - - 1 - -

Quantity 10 2 1 - 3 2 1 2 - - 4 16 - - - 1 - -

Minh Khai HH 7 - - 1 2 1 - - 1 - 1 - - - - - - -

Quantity 12 - - 1 3 1 - - 1 - 1 - - - - - - -

Tan Hoa HH 1 2 - 3 1 1 2 - - - - - - - - - -

Quantity 2 2 - 3 1 1 22 - - - - - - - - - -

Total HH 99 11 8 4 22 5 8 19 9 8 21 17 1 9 4 2 1 1

Quantity 183 18 10 4 28 10 14 166 16 23 31 65 1 15 8 2 1 1

26

Table 13: Impacts on crops

Commune Unit Affected rice Affected corn

Tan Le HH 11 -

Quantity (m2) 413 -

Hung Nhan town HH 19 1

Quantity (m2) 1,714 228

Lien Hiep HH 50 -

Quantity (m2) 5,425 -

Phuc Khanh HH 12 -

Quantity (m2) 449 -

Thai Phuong HH 1 -

Quantity (m2) 100 -

Hung Ha town HH 40 -

Quantity (m2) 612 -

Total HH 133 1

Quantity (m2) 8,713 228

2.6. Impacts on public works

The public works affected are described in table 14 below.

Table 14: The public land and public works affected by the project

Commune Affected Assets Owner Unit Quantity

1. Thien Phien,

Tien Lu district,

Hung Yen

Specific Use Land

Commune PC

m2

365

2. Tan Le, Hung

Ha, Thai Binh

Specific Use Land Trieu Duong Post m2 13.4

Annual crop land Commune PC m2 23.7

Perennial crop land Commune PC m2 568.7

Irrigation canal land Commune PC m2 1,247.3

Electric pole Hung Ha Power Service Pole 26.0

Power wire Hung Ha Power Service m 80.0

3. Hung Nhan

town, Hung Ha,

Thai Binh

Residential land Commune PC m2 125.8

Annual crop land Commune PC m2 1,376.7



5. Lien Hiep,

Hung Ha, Thai

Binh



27

Commune Affected Assets Owner Unit Quantity

6. Phuc Khanh,

Hung Ha, Thai

Binh




7. Thai Phuong,

Hung Ha, Thai

Binh




8. Hung Ha town,

Hung Ha, Thai

Binh

Specific Use Land Hung Ha Passenger Bus Station m2 114.0

Other non-agricultural land Commune PC m2 95.3

Fish pond land Commune PC m2 616.5



9. Minh Khai,

Hung Ha, Thai

Binh

Specific Use Land Commune PC m2 137.0





10. Hong Linh,

Hung Ha, Thai

Binh

Annual crop land Commune PC m2 3,535.5




11. Minh Tan,

Dong Hung, Thai

Binh



Irrigation canal land Commune PC m2 122.0

2.7. Impacts on women headed households

Table 15 describes the severity of impact to the women headed households. 15 women headed

households have more than 10% of their productive land acquired and 18 others have all of their

residential land affected.

Table 16 shows the results of analysis on the average affected areas of land types of the women

headed households. The rates of affected areas are low compared to the total land areas they are

holdings.

28

Table 15: Land acquisition impacts to Households Headed by Women

District Commune

Productive land Residential land

<10% 10%–

30%

Above

30%–

50%

Above

50%–

70%

>70% Total Fully Partially Total

Hung

Ha

Tan Le 3 3 - - - 6 3 2 5

Hung Nhan

town 9 2 1 - 2 14 4 11 15

Lien Hiep 3 2 2 1 - 8 2 15 17

Phuc Khanh - 1 - - - 1 1 5 6

Thai Phuong - 1 - - - 1 - - -

Hung Ha

town - - - - - - 1 4 5

Hong Linh - - - - - - 1 4 5

Minh Khai 4 - - - - 4 6 13 19

Tan Hoa - - - - - - - 1 1

Grand total 19 9 3 1 2 34 18 55 73

29

Table 16: Average Land Holdings and Severity of Land Acquisition Impacts with Households Headed by Women

Commune Index

Available

annual crop

land

Affected

annual crop

land

Available

garden

land

Affected

garden

land

Available

aquaculture

land

Affected

aquaculture

land

Residential

land

Affected

residential

land

Tan Le HH 6 6 - - - - 5 5

Average area (m2) 454.3 23.4 - - - - 195.2 7.2

Hung Nhan

town

HH 14 14 - - - - 15 15

Average area (m2) 1,751.3 137.4 - - - - 255.3 39.6

Lien Hiep HH 8 8 - - - - 17 17

Average area (m2) 1,062.8 141.0 - - - - 236.3 63.2

Phuc Khanh HH - - - - 1 1 6 6

Average area (m2) - - - - 131.0 33.0 302.8 17.1

Thai

Phuong

HH 1 1 - - - - - -

Average area (m2) 360.0 42.0 - - - - - -

Hung Ha

town

HH - - - - - - 5 5

Average area (m2) - - - - - - 209.8 17.1

Hong Linh HH - - - - - - 5 5

Average area (m2) - - - - - - 179.6 35.5

Minh Khai HH 4 4 - - - - 19 19

Average area (m2) 755.0 14.8 - - - - 172.5 8.7

Tan Hoa HH - - - - - - 1 1

Average area (m2) - - - - - - 400.0 45.2

Total HH 33 33 - - 1 1 73 73

Average area (m2) 1,185.6 99.8 - - 131.0 33.0 222.8 31.2

30

3. SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILES

3.1. Overview of project socio-economic situation

Thai Binh province is in the Red River Delta of northern Vietnam. It is surrounded by

Hai Duong Province and Hai Phong City on the North, Ha Nam and Hung Yen provinces on

the West, East Sea on the East and Nam Dinh Province on the South.

The total area of Thai Binh province is about 1.570,06 km2, in which the inner city has

the area of 67,74 km2. The province has 07 districts including Quynh Phu, Hung Ha, Dong

Hung, Thai Thuy, Tien Hai, Kien Xuong and Vu Thu.

The total population of the province in 2011 is 1,786,300 people, in which the population

in the Thai Binh city is 184,520 people (accounting for 4,31%) and that in the districts is

1,502,320 (accounting for 95,68%).

The number of labor employed in the province in 2011 was 1,010,100 people. In

particular, the number of technical workers was 68,686; that of qualified employees who

graduated from high schools, colleges and universities was 104,040 people and the number of

others was 837,374 people. The labor structure is divided as follows:

1. Agriculture, forestry and fisheries: 600,000 employees accounted for 59.40%

2. Industry and construction : 252,100 workers accounted for 24.96%

3. Services : 109,024 employees accounted for 10.79%

4. Others : 48,976 employees accounted for 4.85%.

Some detailed information about Thai Binh Province is shown in table below

Table 17: Demographic Characteristics at Project Communes/Districts

No. City/District

Natural

area

(Km2)

No. of

communes/

wards

Average

population

(person)

Population

density

(person/km2)

In which

Male Female

1 Thai Binh city 67,74 19 184,520 2,725 88,570 95,950

2 Quynh Phu district 209,61 38 233,090 1,112 111,883 121,207

3 Hung Ha district 210,29 35 247,360 1,176 118,733 128,627

4 Dong Hung district 196,05 44 234,060 1,194 112,349 121,711

5 Thai Thuy district 265,84 48 247,670 932 118,882 128,788

6 Tien Hai district 226,04 35 208,600 923 100,128 108,472

7 Kien Xuong district 199,35 37 212,550 1,066 102,024 110,526

8 Vu Thu district 195,14 30 218,450 1,119 104,856 113,594

Whole province 0 286 1,786,300 1,138 857,425 928,875

(Source: The Statistical Yearbook of Thai Binh Province, 2011)

31

Health care: According to 2011 statistics data, Thai Binh has 334 health care

organizations including provincial-level, district-level hospitals and commune-level clinics at

every commune. Total number of staff in health care sector is 5,290 people, reaching the rate

of 2.9 health care staff/1000 persons. This rate is rather good compared with other provinces

in the North.

Table 18: Health establishments, beds and staffs by state management

Item Unit 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

1. Number of health establishments Unit 303 305 307 309 334

2. Number of beds Bed 3,595 3,535 3,893 4,388 4,615

3. Medical staff Person 3,262 3,629 3,752 3,882 5,290

4. Pharmaceutical staff Person 1,093 1,189 1,250 1,301 2,248

(Source: The Statistical Yearbook of Thai Binh Province, 2011)

Education: All communes have kindergartens and elementary schools. There are around

3-6 high schools in each district. And number of colleges and universities in the province is 9.

Elementary and Secondary education are provided to all children all over the province.

3.2. Socio-Economic Conditions of DPs

Data on socio-economic situation of the DPs by the project is collected from the survey

results through questionnaire interview for 202 households (HHs) in Hung Ha district (there

are no DPs in Tien Lu and Dong Hung districts) and focus interviews with nearly 65

representatives from households, district/communes and village staff (including both men and

women) and 18 public consultations and group discussions. The selection of HH sample for

socio-economic survey is based on the results of inventory losses (IOL) and severely DPs due

to the loss of agricultural land, loss of residential land and HHs doing businesses. The formal

and informal meetings and group discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders

were held during the implementation of socio-economic survey.

The number of surveyed households through questionnaire survey is listed in the

following table:

Table 19: Socio-economic survey scale

No. Project area - Hung Ha district Household number

1 Tan Le commune 16

2 Hung Nhan town 36

3 Lien Hiep commune 61

4 Phuc Khanh commune 17

5 Thai Phuong commune 7

32

No. Project area - Hung Ha district Household number

6 Hung Ha town 8

7 Hong Linh commune 9

8 Minh Khai commune 40

9 Tan Hoa commune 8

Total 202

3.2.1. The demographic characteristics of APs

According to the survey sample of 202 HHs living in the project area, there is no ethnic

minority people in the project area. Average number of people in a HH was 3.5 members and

51,9% men and 48,1% women.

3.2.2. Household size

Average number of people in a HH was 3.5 members in the project area. Among them,

the HHs with the family size of less than 3 persons account for the highest proportion of

43,56%; followed by the family size from 3 to 4 persons (accounting for 40,59%). There are

only 2 households from the survey sample with more than 6 persons (accounting for 0,99%).

The detail results are shown in the table below:

Table 20: Household size

District Commune < 3

members

3–4

members

5–6

members

> 6

members Total

Hung

Ha

Tan Le 8 7 1 - 16

Hung Nhan town 13 12 11 - 36

Lien Hiep 23 29 8 1 61

Phuc Khanh 6 3 7 1 17

Thai Phuong 6 1 - - 7

Hung Ha town 3 5 - - 8

Hong Linh 5 4 - - 9

Minh Khai 21 16 3 - 40

Tan Hoa 3 5 - - 8

Grand Total 88 82 30 2 202

(Source: Socio-economic survey results of Thai Binh province, 3/2013)

33

3.2.3. Gender distribution

With regard to the gender ratio, male rate of 51.9% and female rate of 48.1% are the

average of the district. The rates are different from commune to commune. In some

communes, the rate of male is lower, in others it is higher than the rate of female. The detailed

survey results are described in the table below.

Table 21: Gender distribution of HH Member in affected communes

District Commune No. of

SES HH

Male Female Total

Person % Person % Person %

Hung

Ha

Tan Le 16 28 53.8% 24 46.2% 52 100%

Hung Nhan town 36 67 48.6% 71 51.4% 138 100%

Lien Hiep 61 113 51.1% 108 48.9% 221 100%

Phuc Khanh 17 41 56.9% 31 43.1% 72 100%

Thai Phuong 7 11 57.9% 8 42.1% 19 100%

Hung Ha town 8 15 51.7% 14 48.3% 29 100%

Hong Linh 9 19 70.4% 8 29.6% 27 100%

Minh Khai 40 66 49.3% 68 50.7% 134 100%

Tan Hoa 8 13 50.0% 13 50.0% 26 100%

Grand total 202 373 51.9% 345 48.1% 718 100%


3.2.4. Education

Most of household heads had higher education than primary school. Among them, the

people with secondary school qualification accounted for the highest proportion of 39,55%;

followed by intermediate level, college and university level (accounting for 18,52%) and high

school (accounting for 15,18%). The rate of DPs with secondary qualification occupied the

lowest rate (10,7%). There was no case of illiteracy.

Table 22: Education level of Household members

District Commune Illiter

ate

Prim

ary

Seconda

ry school

Not

finishe

d high

school

High

scho0

ol

Vocatio

nal

Univer

sity

and

above

Oth

er Total

Hung

Ha

Tan Le - 1 25 3 11 2 10 - 52

Hung Nhan

town - 23 49 25 16 2 17 6 138

Lien Hiep - 27 88 25 33 17 25 6 221

Phuc Khanh - 12 17 13 10 4 12 4 72

Thai Phuong - - 11 4 2 - 2 - 19

34

District Commune Illiter

ate

Prim

ary

Seconda

ry school

Not

finishe

d high

school

High

scho0

ol

Vocatio

nal

Univer

sity

and

above

Oth

er Total

Hung Ha

town - 3 7 - 13 1 5 - 29

Hong Linh - 1 9 7 5 3 2 - 27

Minh Khai - 8 66 14 16 9 18 3 134

Tan Hoa - 2 12 3 3 1 3 2 26

Grand total - 77 284 94 109 39 94 21 718


3.2.5. Main income sources and income level of AHs

Income sources

DPs have income sources from various sectors such as agriculture, fisheries, trade,

employment... Income sources depend on the districts. In communes of Hung Nhan, Minh Khai

and Lien Hiep, household income source was mainly from agricultural activities which accounted

for the highest rate, while those in other districts households had income source mainly from labor

salaries. Detail is in the below table.

35

Table 23: Income sources, according to communes/districts (%)

Commune Unit Agricult

ure

Livest

ock Sale

Catering

service

Workers

in factory,

workshop

Staff in

Governmental

offices

Work for

private

companies

Work in

transport

field

House

work

Hired

worker Other Total

Tan Le HH 17 2 9 0 6 10 0 1 0 8 1 54

% 31.5 3.7 16.7 0.0 11.1 18.5 0.0 1.9 0.0 14.8 1.9 100

TT Hung Nhan HH 71 5 6 0 7 9 1 0 4 13 3 119

% 59.7 4.2 5.0 0.0 5.9 7.6 .8 0.0 3.4 10.9 2.5 100.0

Lien Hiep HH 102 1 13 0 5 9 0 0 1 34 24 189

% 54.0 .5 6.9 0.0 2.6 4.8 0.0 0.0 .5 18.0 12.7 100.0

Phuc Khanh HH 27 2 3 0 1 6 1 0 2 8 3 53

% 50.9 3.8 5.7 0.0 1.9 11.3 1.9 0.0 3.8 15.1 5.7 100.0

Thai Phuong HH 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 12

% 58.3 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 100.0

TT Hung Ha HH 10 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 2 22

% 45.5 0.0 9.1 0.0 9.1 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.1 100.0

Hong Linh HH 19 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 30

% 63.3 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 3.3 100.0

Minh Khai HH 48 1 3 0 4 7 0 0 1 22 9 95

% 50.5 1.1 3.2 0.0 4.2 7.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 23.2 9.5 100.0

Tan Hoa HH 4 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 8

% 50.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 12.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 100.0

Total HH 305 11 43 0 25 48 3 1 8 95 43 582

% 52.4 1.9 7.4 0.0 4.3 8.2 .5 .2 1.4 16.3 7.4 100.0


36

Survey results also showed that, except for households in which both spouses were

working in state agencies, most households have at least two or more different sources of

income. For agricultural HHs, the majority of additional income sources could be from

employment or state agencies; other households had revenues from small businesses,

combined with employment and other payment sources. Many HHs had about 03-04 income

sources. Through group discussion and public consultation, it was confirmed that household’s

income sources have experienced a transformation from agricultural into non-agricultural

sources. Number of laborers now working in the agricultural sector has also decreased, and

these laborers are mainly in the age range from 45 to 55. The laborers with age under 45

mainly work in non-agricultural sector.

Income level

According to survey results, the income levels of DPs mainly belonged to the group of 3-

5 million VND / household / month (50 %). Households with incomes more than 60

million/household/year accounted for proportion of 27.3%. Next was the number of

households with income level of about 12-30 million/year (up to 21,78%) equivalent to

average income ranging from 1 million VND to 3 million VND/person/month. Households

with incomes below 12 million/household/year accounted for lowest proportion (0.92%).

In the survey area, there is not great difference of income level between agricultural and

non-agricultural HHs living in different communes. This is due to the transformation into

non-agricultural income sources which has mainly taken place in Thai Binh province.

Agricultural households do not depend on only a single source of income but they have

income from various activities. Among them, agriculture is only one part of the income

structure of the whole family.

Table 24: HH income according to Project locations ( /month)

District Commune <VND 1

million

VND 1 million -

< VND 3 million

VND 3 million –

VND 5 million

> VND 5

million Total

Hung

Ha

Tan Le 0 3 9 4 16

Hung Nhan town 0 9 20 7 36

Lien Hiep 0 13 29 19 61

Phuc Khanh 1 0 9 7 17

Thai Phuong 0 4 3 0 7

Hung Ha town 0 1 3 4 8

Hong Linh 0 1 7 1 9

Minh Khai 1 11 16 12 40

Tan Hoa 0 2 5 1 8

Grand Total 2 44 101 55 202


37

3.2.6. Expenditure

According to survey results, the expenditure of households focused on the range of 12 -

30 million VND / household / year, accounting for 78.2%. Next was the HH group which has

the spending rate of 30 - 60 million VND / household / year (accounting for 15%). Spending

level below 12 million VND / household / year accounted for lowest percentage (to 0.9%).

Spending level over 60 million VND / household / year accounted for 5.9 %. The majority of

households surveyed said that with their current income they were able to save money.

3.2.7. Living standards and Family facilities

Living standard: The poverty standard of Vietnam Government for Period 2011-2015

defines that HHs whose average income is equal or less than 400,000 VND/person/month are the

poor. According to the survey, the number of poor HHs in the project area is 2.9%1

Table 25: Classification of households by income

# Commune Classification of households by income

Poor Pro-poor None-Poor Total

1 Tan Le HH 0 0 54 54

% .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%

2 TT Hung Nhan HH 2 0 117 119

% 1.7% .0% 98.3% 100.0%

3 Lien Hiep HH 5 0 184 189

% 2.6% .0% 97.4% 100.0%

4 Phuc Khanh HH 0 0 53 53

% .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%

5 Thai Phuong HH 1 1 10 12

% 8.3% 8.3% 83.3% 100.0%

6 TT Hung Ha HH 0 0 22 22

% .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%

7 Hong Linh HH 0 0 30 30

% .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%

8 Minh Khai HH 7 0 88 95

% 7.4% .0% 92.6% 100.0%

9 Tan Hoa HH 2 0 6 8

% 25.0% .0% 75.0% 100.0%

Total HH 17 1 564 582

% 2.9% .2% 96.9% 100.0%


1 The poverty standard in Decision No.09/2011/QD-TTg dated 30 January 2011 of the Prime Minister is applied

for Period 2011-2015 as follows: Rural areas: households whose average income is equal or less than 400,000

VND/person/month are the poor; households whose income ranges 401,000 - 520,000 VND / person / month are

the pro-poor). Urban areas: households whose average income is equal or less than 500,000 VND/person/month

are the poor; households whose income ranges 501,000 - 650,000 VND / person / month are the pro-poor).

38

Household Facilities: According the survey results, furniture, color TV, motorbikes, telephones,

refrigerators, air conditioners, and cars, are owned by families. Details are described in the

following table.

Table 26: Facilities of affected households

Facilities Rate (%) Facilities Rate (%)

Furniture 59.4 Refrigerator 73.2

Motorbike 99.9 Washing machine 71.8

Bicycle 85.7 Air Conditioner 51.4

Color TV 100 Car 1.8


3.2.8. Housing and residential land

Most houses of the surveyed households are permanent (one or two stories), accounting

for 59.8%; followed by the percentage of semi-permanent houses (houses, tiles or concreted

roof -the level 4 house) accounting for 40.2%. There is no thatched household. The average

housing area of the households ranges from 80 - 100 m2/household accounting for the highest

proportion with 38.7%; followed by the proportion of houses with area of more than

100m2/household, accounting for 28.9%. The area less than 80 m

2 accounts for lowest

percentage of only 16.6%.

Table 27: House types of displaced people

No. Commune House type Total

Permanent Semi-permanent

1

Tan Le

10 6 16

65.0% 35.0% 100.0%

2

Hung Nhan

20 16 36

55.7% 44.3% 100.0%

3

Lien Hiep

40 21 61

65.6% 34.4% 100.0%

4

Phuc Khanh

11 6 17

64.0% 36.0% 100.0%

5

Thai Phuong

5 2 7

69.1% 30.9% 100.0%

6

Hung Ha

3 5 8

41.7% 58.3% 100.0%

7

Hong Linh

5 4 9

56.2% 43.8% 100.0%

8

Minh Khai

27 13 40

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

9

Tan Hoa

5 3 8

64.6% 35.4% 100.0%

Total 202


39

Occupants that self-constructed their houses account for 74.9%, followed by 25.1%

which have inherited it from their parents.

According to the field survey and public consultation with local governments, it was

confirmed that most of the houses are built on legal land, and their owners are holding land

use certificate. Temporary housing mainly belongs to poor households which might be

requiring relocation as per the province’s Master Plan.

3.2.9. Utilities and public services

Electricity use: According to the survey, 100% of the surveyed households use state

power grid with separate meters. Electricity consumption of an average household costs

around 100,000 VND / household / month.

Clean water: In the project area, there is no case of using water from ponds, rivers and

lakes for residential activities. There are three main water sources of the households which are

tap water, water from dug and drilled wells. Households in Hung Ha, Hong Linh and Minh

Khai mainly use water from dug wells and drilled wells. There are only 3 districts Hung

Nhan, Phuc Khanh and Tan Hoa where households can use tap water.

Table 28: Water Source for Using of Affected Households

District Commune Unit

Water Source for Using

Total Well

Tap

Water

Rain

water

Buying

from

other

Drilled

well

Hung

Ha

Tan Le HH 0 0 0 0 16 16

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100%

Hung Nhan

town

HH 4 13 1 9 9 36

% 11.10% 36.10% 2.80% 25.00% 25.00% 100%

Lien Hiep HH 1 0 0 0 60 61

% 1.60% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 98.40% 100%

Phuc Khanh HH 6 2 0 0 9 17

% 35.30% 11.80% 0.00% 0.00% 52.90% 100%

Thai

Phuong

HH 1 0 1 0 5 7

% 14.30% 0.00% 14.30% 0.00% 71.40% 1

Hung Ha

town

HH 0 0 0 0 8 8

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100%

Hong Linh HH 0 0 0 0 9 9

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100%

Minh Khai HH 0 0 0 0 40 40

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100%

Tan Hoa HH 4 2 0 0 2 8

% 50.00% 25.00% 0.00% 0.00% 25.00% 100%

Total HH 16 17 2 9 158 202

% 7.90% 8.40% 1.00% 4.50% 78.20% 100%


40

Toilet: 100% of households have sanitary toilets. Most of households’ toilets have septic

tanks, accounting for as much as 80% of households. Households using two - compartment

toilets account for 20%. There is no case of household using public toilets or lacking toilets

Solid waste collection: Currently 100% of communes in the project area have solid waste

collection system.

3.2.10. Healthcare and Education conditions

Healthcare: In the project area, there are no households undertaking medical examination

every year. Most families are usually treated at district hospitals (79.8%) and others self-

medicate themselves (11.4%). In addition, other health services such as district health centers,

clinics and medical stations at communes are also popular among local people. According to

public health registries, local healthcare and family planning in the project’s communes have

been implemented comprehensively.

Education: Each district or commune have preschools, a primary school and a secondary

school. All communes have primary and secondary education levels...

4. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ENTITLEMENT POLICY

4.1. Legal Framework

Compensation, assistance and resettlement policy proposed for the VRAMP is based on

Laws, Decrees, Guideline Circulars and Decision of compensation and resettlement of the

Vietnam Government and involuntary resettlement policy of the World Bank.

4.1.1. The World Bank’s policy on Involuntary Resettlement

If involuntary resettlement under projects are not minimized, it often causes impacts on

economy, society and environment such as destroying production system, damages on

material and immaterial assets (i.e.: building, land, forest resource, cultural destinations,

economic assets and cultural and social activities). Such impacts may be permanent or

temporary. Therefore, the WB’s policy OP 4.12 includes safeguard measures to resolve and

minimize these risks.

The overall objectives of the Bank's policy on involuntary resettlement are the following:

(a) Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring

all viable alternative project designs.

(b) Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be

conceived and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient

investment resources to enable the persons displaced by the project to share in project

benefits. Displaced persons should be meaningfully consulted and should have opportunities

to participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs.

(c) Displaced persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and

standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels or to

levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher.

41

4.1.2. Laws, Decrees, Circulars and Decision of compensation and resettlement of the

Vietnam Government

Laws, juridical documents of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and Decisions of Project

provinces People’s Committee applied are as follows:

- Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam dated April 15, 1992;

- Land law dated November 26, 2003;

- Decree No.181/2004/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated October 29, 2004, guiding

the implementation Land Law;

- Decree No.188/2004/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated November 16, 2004, on

methods of determining land prices and land price framework;

- Decree No. 197/2004/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated December 03, 2004 on

compensation, assistance and resettlement when the State acquires land;

- Decree No. 198/2004/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated December 03, 2004 on

collection of land use fee;

- Decree No. 38/2013/ND-CP dated April 23, 2013 of the Government, on management and

use of official development assistance (ODA) and concessional loans of donors, replacing

Decree No.131/2006/ND-CP dated November 09, 2006;

- Decree No. 84/2007/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated May 25, 2007on

additional regulations on granting land-use rights certificates; land acquisition;

implementing land-use rights; settling land claims; and orders and procedures for

compensation and resettlement when the State acquires land;

- Decree No. 123/2007/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated July 27, 2007 on

amendment and supplement of a number of articles in Decree No. 188/2004 on Nov 16,

2004 on determination methods of land prices and land price frame;

- Decree No. 69/2009/ND-CP of the Vietnam Government dated August 13, 2009 on

additional regulations on land use planning, land prices, land acquisition, compensation,

assistance and resettlement;

- Circular No. 114/2004/TT-BTC of the Finance Ministry dated November 26, 2004 on

guidelines on Decree No. 188/2004/ND-CP of Nov 16, 2004 on identification methods of

land prices and land price frame;

- Circular No. 06/2007/TT - BTNMT issued on June 15, 2007 of the Ministry of Natural

Sources and Environment on the implementation guidelines of Decree No.84/2007NĐ-CP

issued on 25th May 2007 regarding additional regulations on granting land using

certificate, land acquisition, implementation of land using, procedures for compensation,

assistance and resettlement when the State acquires land and redress grievances about land

acquisition;

- Circular No.145/2007/TT-BTC dated December 6, 2007 guiding on the implementation of

42

Decree No.188/2004/ND-CP dated November 16, 2004 on methods of determining land

prices and land price frame;

- Circular No.14/2009/TT-BTNMT dated January 10, 2009 of the Ministry of Natural

Resource and Environment, regulating detailed regulations on compensation, assistance

and resettlement and procedures of land acquisition, land allocation and land lease;

- Decree No.11/2010/ND-CP dated 24 February 2010 of the Government on the

management and protection for the roads.

- The Prime Minister’s Document No.1665/TTg-CN, dated 17/10/2006 on the

implementation of the management of site clearance and demining to serve traffic

construction projects.

4.1.3. Policies of Thai Binh People's Committee:

- Decision 16/2009/QD-UBND dated 03 November 2009 on the compensation, assistance,

resettlement policies as land acquisition by GOV in Thai Binh province.

- Decision 07/2011/QD-UBND dated 07 July 2011 on the amendment factors use for

adjusting the compensation unit prices for buildings.

- Decision 15/2012/QD-UBND dated 28 August 2012 on the process, procedure for the

investment projects.

- Decision 3152/QD-UBND dated 29 December 2012 on the land tariff and regulations on

the price of land in Thai Binh province in 2013.

- Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai Binh Provincial People’s

Committee on adjustment the factor of compensation unit prices of construction works

issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated 25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial

People's Committee with K = 1.74.

4.1.4. Gap Analysis and Gap-Filling Measures

The main gaps between the WB Resettlement Policy and Viet Nam’s legislation,

including proposed measures to address the differences, are outlined in Table below.

43

Table 29: Main gaps between compensation, assistance and resettlement policies of Government‟s and World Bank‟s and proposed

policies for project

Policy World Bank „s Policy

(OP 412)

GoV‟s Policy Proposed policy for the Project

Land/ Property

Policy objectives DP (Displaced People) should be

assisted to restore or improved their

living standards to the pre-project

levels.

Resettlement site and its infrastructure

should have equal or better development

conditions than the existing one.

Livelihood and income sources are

restored

Treatment of

informal or not

legal land users

Rehabilitation assistance to all

displaced persons to achieve the

policy objective.

Rehabilitation assistance at different levels

depending on the “illegal” status of land

users.

Rehabilitation assistance to all DPs,

regardless of their legal status.

Compensation for

illegal structures

Compensation at replacement cost

for all structures regardless of

legality status.

Provided to cover the new structure costs.

Depending on the “illegality status”

attributed, covering between 80% and

100% of the total costs.

Assistance at replacement cost for all

structures, and provided regardless of

legal status.

Compensation

Methods for

determining

compensation rates

Compensation for lost land and other

assets should be paid at full

replacement cost.

Compensation for lost assets is calculated at

price close to transferring the assets in the

market. Provincial governments are granted

to annually set up the price for different

categories of assets.

Independent appraiser identifies market

price as a reference for PPC to define

compensation price.

Compensation for

income loss

All income losses should be

compensated.

Income loss is assisted only for registered

business.

All income losses are to be compensated

and restored.

44

Policy World Bank „s Policy

(OP 412)

GoV‟s Policy Proposed policy for the Project

Compensation for

indirect impact

caused by land or

structures taking

It is good practice for the borrower to

undertake a social assessment and

implement measures to minimize and

mitigate adverse economic and social

impacts, particularly upon poor and

vulnerable groups.

It is not addressed. Social assessment undertaken and

measures taken to minimize and mitigate

adverse impacts, particularly upon poor

and vulnerable groups.

Livelihood

restoration and

assistance

Provision of livelihood restoration

and assistance to achieve the policy

objectives.

Livelihood restoration and assistance

measures are provided. Not a follow up for

full livelihood restoration after resettlement

completion.

Provision of livelihood restoration and

assistance to achieve the policy objectives.

Consultation and

disclosure

Participation in planning and

implementation specially confirming

the eligibility criteria for

compensation and assistance and

access to Grievances Mechanisms.

Is limited mostly to information sharing and

disclosure.

Participation designed and implemented to

achieve policy objectives

Grievance and

redress mechanisms

Grievance and redress mechanisms

should be independent

The same body makes decisions on

compensation, resettlement and initial

handling of grievances

Independent grievance and redress

mechanisms to be established

Monitoring &

Evaluation

Internal and External independent

monitoring are required.

There is no explicit requirement on

monitoring, including both internal and

independent (external) monitoring.

Both internal and external monitoring are

defined.

45

4.2. Entitlement policy

4.2.1. Principles for Compensation and Resettlement

All DPs who have assets within or reside within the area of project land-take before the cut-off

date are entitled to compensation or assistance for their losses. Those who have lost their income

and/or subsistence will be eligible for livelihood rehabilitation assistance, based on the criteria of

eligibility defined by the Project and in consultation with the DPs. If, by the end of the project,

livelihoods have been shown not to be restored to pre-project levels, additional measures should be

considered.

The compensation rates will be determined based on the results of independent land/assets

appraisal in a timely and consultative fashion. All fees and taxes on land and/or house

transfers will be waived or otherwise included in a compensation package for land and

structures/houses or businesses. The local authorities will ensure that DPs choosing

relocation on their own obtain, without additional cost, the necessary property titles and

official certificates commensurate with similar packages provided to those who choose to

move to the project resettlement sites.

Land will be compensated “land for land” or in cash according to the DP’s choice whenever

possible. The choice of land for land must be offered to those losing 20% or more of their

productive land. If land is not available, the borrower must assure itself that this is indeed the

case. Those losing 20% or more of their land will have to be assisted to restore their

livelihood. The same principles apply for the poor and vulnerable people losing 10% or more

of their productive landholding.

DPs that prefer “land for land” will be provided with land plots with the equivalent

productive capacity for lost lands if available or a combination of land (a standard land plot)

in a new relocation area nearby for residential land, and cash adjustment for the difference

between their lost land and the land plots provided.

DPs that prefer “cash for land” will be compensated in cash at the full replacement cost.

These DPs will be assisted in rehabilitating their livelihoods and making their own

arrangements for relocation.

Compensation for all residential, commercial, or other structures will be offered at the

replacement cost, without any depreciation of the structure and without deduction for

salvageable materials. Structures shall be evaluated individually.

The DPs will be provided full assistance (including a transportation allowance) for

transportation of personal belongings and assets, in addition to the compensation at

replacement cost of their houses, lands, and other properties.

Compensation and rehabilitation assistance must be provided to each DP at least 30 days

prior to the taking of the assets for those who are not to be relocated and 60 days for those

46

who will have to be relocated. Exceptions should be made in the case of vulnerable groups

who may need more time.

If, by the end of the project, livelihoods have been shown not to be restored to pre-project

levels, additional measures should be considered.

Additional efforts, such as economic rehabilitation assistance, training and other forms of

assistance, should be provided to DPs losing income sources, especially to vulnerable groups

in order to enhance their future prospects toward livelihood restoration and improvement.

The previous level of community services and resources, encountered prior to displacement,

will be maintained or improved for resettlement areas.

4.2.2. Eligibility to compensation, assistance and resettlement

Those, who are affected by the project, will be eligible for compensation as follows:

(a) Those who have legal rights to land or other assets;

(b) Those who currently have no legal rights to land or other assets but have submitted

declarations for legalization of land-use right certificates according to the State regulations,

which are based on archives and documents such as invoices for land-tax payment,

certificates of residence status, or permission for residence and permission for use of the

land affected by the Project the local governments granted for them;

(c) Those who have no legal rights but are in the declarations for legal land-use certificates for

the land they are living on.

Persons who are subject to (a) and (b) are compensated for their land and other affected assets at

replacement costs and provided with other assistances. Persons who are subject to (c) are provided

with resettlement assistances in lieu of compensation for the land they occupy, and other assistance,

as necessary, to achieve the objectives set out in this policy, if they occupy the project area prior to a

cut-off date. Persons who encroach on the area after the cut-off date determined in each RP are not

entitled to compensation or any other form of resettlement assistance (though they may be entitled to

some support).

The cut-off date proposed for this RP is the date of completing for the IOL: 31 March-2013.

4.2.3. Entitlement Policy

Those who are affected by the project will be entitled to the compensation, assistance and

resettlement policies in compliance with the regulations of Vietnam and WB's OP4.12. Project

affected persons will not be considered to receive the compensation or assistance when entering the

project area after the publication of the cut-off date of the project.

The poor/ vulnerable households who are certified by local authorities will be considered for

additional assistances on case-by-case basis as special cases

The Entitlement matrix for the affected persons under VRAMP is shown in the Table below.

47

Table 30: Entitlement Matrix

Type of Impact/Loss Eligibility/ application Entitlement

1. LOSS OF

AGRICULTURAL

LAND (229 HHs)

1.1 Owners of land

with (i) LURC or

(ii) in the process

of acquiring LURC

or (iii) are eligible

to obtain LURC

The affected land is

less than 20% of the

total land area or less

than 10% for

vulnerable group.

(i) Cash compensation for their acquired land at 100% replacement

cost.

(ii) Compensation for affected assets at 100% replacement cost.

(iii) Cash assistance per m2 as set out in PPC’s policies.

The affected land is

from 20% of total

land or from 10% for

vulnerable group.

(i) As priority, compensation "land for land" with equivalent

productive capacity at a location acceptable to the APs, or, if

requested by the DPs, or if "land for land" is not available, cash

compensation for the lost land at replacement cost.


(iii) Cash assistance per m2 as set out in PPC’s policies.

(iv) Receive income restoration assistance and other assistances.

1.2. Land user are not eligible to become

legalized

(i) Will not be compensated for land but will be compensated for

loss of assets on land such as structures, crops and trees at 100%

replacement cost.

(ii) If DP is mainly earning income from agriculture, local

authorities could consider allocating land for the DP based on

the conditions of locality.

1.3. Agricultural lands that are rented

between households or individuals.

Compensation for land will be paid to Land use owner but

compensation at 100% replacement cost of the assets will be paid to

the land-users.

48


2. LOSS OF

RESIDENTIAL

LAND

2.1. Owners of

land with (i) LURC

or (ii) in the

process of

acquiring LURC or

(iii) are eligible to

obtain LURC:

Fully affected

(Includes DPs whose

remaining area is not

enough for

reconstruct of their

houses).

(7 HHs)

(i) Relocation options are to be provided to DPs:

- Self-relocate: Beside of compensation for acquired land at

replacement cost, DPs are entitled to receive an allowance for

preparing and levelling ground floor at the new resettled place as

regulated in Decree 69/2009/ND-CP or

- Allocated land in the resettlement sites with full infrastructure.


(iii)Provision of allowances due to relocation of house, as regulated

in item 8 below.

Partially affected

DPs whose

remaining area is

enough to rebuild the

house (280 HHs)

(i) Cash compensation for their acquired land at 100% replacement

cost.


2.2. Land users are not eligible for

compensation (illegalization of land users).

(i) Compensation for affected assets at 100% replacement cost.

(ii) If the land-user is not eligible for compensation and has no other

place to reside, the user will be assisted to buy a plot or an

apartment in a tenement house or with cash equivalent.

3. IMPACT ON

STRUCTURES

Impact on Houses and

building:27 HHs, Impact on

other structures:257 HHs

Regardless of ownership/usage conditions.

Impact on Houses and building facilities

and Impact on other structures.

(i) DPs will be compensated for their affected structures by 100%

replacement cost without deduction of salvage material or

depreciation.

(ii) The compensation prices are calculated based on the actual

affected areas. Each structure should be evaluated individually.

4. GRAVES/TOMBS

Households whose graves/tombs are

affected by the Project.

DPs are fully compensated for the moving expenses, reburial and

other related costs.

49


5. AFFECTED

CROPS/TREES Persons having crops/trees damaged. Compensation is paid to DPs currently in cultivation at the market

price of crops/trees and/or at the replacement cost of damaged

crops/trees.

6. IMPACTS ON

INCOME AND

BUSINESS

(27 HHs)

Eligible owners of registered business (i) Compensation for loss of income for business registered will be

at 50% of income after tax of one year (equivalent 100% of

income after tax of six months) according to average income in

previous 03 years.

(ii) To provide a support equal to 70% of the basic salary for

permanent laborers for economic establishments, production and

households. The period to calculate support must not exceed 6

months.

(iii)To provide compensation for the loss of business structures,

production materials at full replacement costs of the structures,

excluding depreciation.

Eligible owners of non- registered

business

Compensation for loss of income for business registered will be at

50% of income after tax of six month (equivalent 100% of income

after tax of three months) according to average income in previous 03

years.

7. TEMPORARY

IMPACTS IN THE

IMPLEMENTATION

PHASE

DPs having residential land temporarily

affected.

(i) To compensate for all affected assets attached to land at the

replacement cost

(ii) To restore the land to its original condition.

DPs having agricultural land temporarily

affected.

(i) To compensate for a crop of crops/ plants at the full market price.

(ii) To compensate for loss of income for the next crops during the

time land is temporarily affected

(iii) To restore the land to its original condition or improve land

quality to equal or better levels prior to the project implementation.

50


Business householders temporarily

affected.

(i) To compensate and support for lost income of collectives, private

or individual enterprises if they are directly affected during

construction stage.

(ii) To compensate for affected assets attached to land at the

replacement cost.

8. AFFECTED

PUBLIC ASSETS

Communes, wards, administrative units

having public housing, structures, schools,

bridges, factories, water sources, roads,

wastewater systems, and irrigation systems

damaged.

To restore or repair depending on each circumstance and the

community do not have to pay for the expenses.

For cultural structures, churches, communal dwelling houses,

pagodas, hermitages, shrines under the local governance that need to

be relocated, the City People’s Committee shall make decisions based

on proposals of the Resettlement and compensation Council and

opinions of local authority and community in areas where there are

affected structures.

9. ALLOWANCE

AND RESTORATION

SUPPORT

All relocating households (i) Assistance for moving/resettlement: Relocated HHs will receive

cash assistance for moving to the new place as per PPC’s

regulation.

(ii) Assistance for life stabilization: Relocated HHs will receive life

stabilization support in cash, equivalent to 30kg of rice per person

per month, at average market price at compensation time notified

by Financial Department.

Assistance for a period of 6 months for relocating to other places,

and 3 months for reorganizing on the remaining land or repairing

the remaining house.

(iii)Assistance for renting house will be provided as per Provincial

People’s Committee regulations.

(iv) Assistance for Self-Relocation: DPs are entitled to receive an

allowance for preparing and leveling ground floor at the new

resettled place as regulated in Decree 69/2009/ND-CP. The

amount will be provided as per Provincial People’s Committee

regulations.

51


Loss of

Income/Livelihood

due to loss of

productive land

All DPs All affected households are entitled to monetary support for job

retraining equivalent from 1.5 to 5 time of agricultural land price of

recovered agriculture land. The amount will be provided as per

Provincial People’s Committee regulations

DPs that lose 20%

or more productive

land holding (or

from 10% for

vulnerable group)

(i) DPs will be entitled to receive Life stabilization assistance as

follows:

a) Losing from 20% to 70% (or from 10% to 70% for vulnerable

group).

30 kg of rice per person per month for 6 months if not

relocating

30 kg of rice per person per month for 12 months if relocating

b) Losing more than 70%

30 kg of rice per person per month for 12 months if not

relocating

30 kg of rice per person per month for 24 months if relocating

(ii) Other rehabilitation measures will be provided such as assistance

with seeds or improved young animals, agricultural extension

training, services, plant protection or veterinary services, technical

assistance for business or non-farm production. The type of

rehabilitation measures will be identified during the

implementation of the RP in consultation with the DPs.

Affected vulnerable groups Vulnerable households will receive life stabilization of 30 kg of rice/

person / month for 24 months at the time of compensation.

Bonus for timely handover of land for all

DPs.

Households who hand-over their affected properties on time (partially

or totally affected land) will be provided with bonus allowance. The

amount will be in conformity with the locality's actual conditions.

52

5. RESETTLEMENT

PMU3 and relevant organization needs to consider possible options with timely meaningful

consultation of DPs on resettlement alternatives (including the new location area), in order to minimize

and/ or reduce adverse impacts.

According to the survey results, the total number of households to be relocated under the project

is 7. They expect to receive all compensation, assistance and allowance for self-relocation. However,

to make sure that the households would not be in a difficult situation of purchasing land and

constructing the new houses as well as moving arrangement to new places, the commune authorities

and RP implementing Agencies need to assist the households who have to move to new places in a

process of purchasing residential land, constructing new house, obtaining legal papers related to land

and building ownership. The households will be assisted with connection to living facilities such as

water supply, power supply, communication system etc.

The households must be fully compensated for land and non-land affected assets and paid and

with full assistance package and give them enough time to construct the new house. They will not be

required to demolish the houses before the completion of houses at new place.

PMU3 and independent monitoring agency need to monitor and describe in the periodical reports

about the resettlement status of the households who are fully affected on houses and the repairing

status of the partly affected houses of the households. It is also needed to monitor that the houses are

compensated at full replacement costs as principle in this RP.

6. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION

6.1. Overview

The general purpose of this program is to restore the livelihoods of affected persons to same as or

higher rate than before the implementation of the Project, and ensure that affected people adapt to new

conditions.

For the Resettlement Plan (RP) implementation, the PMU3 will collaborate with local authorities

at all levels and social organizations to restore DPs’ incomes sources. The activities are mainly

vocational training, job introduction and Agricultural activities.

6.2. Analysis of demand

According to the survey results, there are 86 households, whose agricultural land is heavily

affected (over 20% of agricultural land and 10% for vulnerable); 27 households having business

affected, 7 relocated households and 82 vulnerable households have to be paid special attention during

the income restoration program implementation. Many affected households still practice agricultural

production. However, according to the survey, an estimate of 75% households are currently living in

agricultural occupations, in which 28% of their income come from other revenue sources such as

business, services and freelance and a few are government staff.

The DPs have been consulted through the questionnaires and community consultations, their

views and opinions to the life restoration after resettlement is shown as follows:

53

6.2.1. Expectations for livelihood stabilization:

When asked about the project impacts, approximately 75% households said the project will have

significant impacts on their lives. Namely, about 35.8% households would have no land for

production; about 30% said the project would disturb their family life; 12.9% said their family

economy will be relatively impacted.

People living in the project area expect the project’s assistance of Self-employment, vocational

orientation and Agricultural activities. Specifically, 12.5% wanted vocational training; 36.3% needed

Self-employment; 33.8% wanted assist on agricultural activities. The details of people’s expectations

are shown in the following table:

Table 31: Preferences of the households to the income restoration activities

District Commune Affected

households

HH

gave

answers

Agricultural

activities

Vocational

Training

Self-

employment

No answers

given

HH % HH % HH % HH %

Hung

Ha

Tan Le 54 5 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%

Hung Nhan 119 25 4 16.0% 3 12.0% 17 68.0% 1 4.0%

Lien Hiep 189 46 19 41.3% 6 13.0% 10 21.7% 11 23.9%

Phuc Khanh 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Thai Phuong 12 1 0 0 0 0 1 100% 0 0

Hung Ha 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hong Linh 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Minh Khai 95 3 2 66.7% 0 0 0 0 1 33.3%

Tan Hoa 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 582 80 27 33.8% 10 12.5% 29 36.3% 14 17.5%

6.2.2. Potential Activities Raised by Households

As a result of consultation with the local authorities, various organizations and affected

households, the following farm-based and non-farm based activities/programs are listed for

consideration in the planning of a responsive income restoration program that will cater to the needs

and preparedness of each eligible household:

a. Piloting of selected production and income generating opportunities that are endorsed by the

province and district. Vocational training and non-farm based employment should be first

priority.

b. Intensive agricultural production for farmers who still have remaining productive land.

c. Skills training program for persons wishing to receive training on selected fields. The training

should be on (i) vocational courses; (ii) intensive farming; (iii) animal husbandry; (iv)

aquaculture; (v) managing small business.

54

d. For households who wish to venture into small businesses, the Project will explore possible

seminars on entrepreneurship (idea generation and visioning, basic sales, marketing and

finance management).

e. Table 31 shows the results that most of the households prefer self-employment (36.3%), very

few households prefer vocational training (12.5%). High portion of the households prefer to

continue farming activities (33.8%) and 17.5% still gives no answers to their preferences.

With these results, the income restoration implementation need to focus mainly on the

assistance to the programs of farming extension, monitoring the self-employment activities

and getting the option of the households who still gives no choice to income restoration at this

phase of consultation.

6.3. Implementation issue

The aforementioned possible income restoration activities are generic in nature, tentative and

initial and, therefore, cannot be used as basis for detailed planning. During the conduct of detailed

measurement survey (DMS), the consultants will help design and implement the income restoration

program and will spearhead the process of identifying the livelihood activities of each household by

evaluating the household’s specific needs against the household’s preferences, inclination and

preparedness, and by assessing the availability of external support needed by the household to pursue

its chosen livelihood activities. The consultants will investigate and evaluate possible employment,

credit facility and provider of training when conducting needs and opportunities assessment for each

participating eligible household. Any good models from other project with the similar conditions also

need to be studied to apply to the project.

The singular objective of the income restoration program is to help the severely affected and

vulnerable households rebuild their sources of livelihood and thus regain, if not improve, their pre-

project standards of living. In addition to the principles governing the project resettlement policy, the

income restoration program will abide by the following precepts: be responsive to the specific needs

and attuned to the level of preparedness of the household; be sustainable and geared towards self-

determination and empowerment rather than dependence; foster justice and fairness, camaraderie,

social consciousness; and, be gender sensitive and environmentally sound.

Moreover, depending on its needs, preferences, and available human and material resources within

the household and those that the project could provide, each participating eligible household may

engage in one main source of livelihood to be augmented by secondary livelihood activities, especially

when the main livelihood does not yield immediate returns, such as livestock and crop production.

Secondary livelihood activities will help provide for the daily sustenance of the household in the

interim. A key ingredient of the program is to ensure that each DP household has the means for daily

sustenance.

Information pamphlets for each program will be prepared by the consultant of PMU3 and will be

made available to households and in commune offices. Information will include but not limited to the

following:

55

Production (farm and non-farm based)/Income-generating activities: type of program,

investment costs and net returns, time-frame for income stream to develop, sustainability, and

risks.

Project-related opportunities: type of workers needed, duration of contract, minimum salary

and benefits, schedule, basic requirements/qualifications of workers, contact persons.

Employment opportunities: name and address of organization, nature of organization, number

of required workers, basic requirements/ qualifications of workers; trainings to be provided;

minimum salary and benefits, contact persons,

Skills Trainings: type of trainings, objectives, duration, cost to trainee, qualification of trainee,

type of certification to be issued upon completion of training; links to jobs.

Access to credit: type of loans; requirements to avail loan, term of payments and interest rates,

risks involved.

The consultants of PMU3 for income restoration implementation will be composed of various

experts to design, implement and administer various programs. The process of planning appropriate

income restoration activities of eligible households begins about the same time as that of the DMS.

Data gathering and in-depth investigation of needs and opportunities will be done in parallel with the

DMS. The various income restoration activities planned and agreed with the participating households

will be included in the updated RP including the analysis of risk, marketing for the planed programs

etc. The implementation of the program will be monitored regularly to ensure that targets are achieved

and will be included in the resettlement progress report that will be submitted to WB. An evaluation

of the income restoration program will be conducted to sum up what has been achieved, to identify

additional interventions, as needed; and to draw out lessons and insights.

6.4. Implementation plan

The steps proposed for the implementation phase of income restoration as table below:

Table 32: Steps proposed for the implementation phase of income restoration

# Activity Time schedule Responsible Agency

1. Prepare the list of severely affected

DP (Losing from 20% of productive

land or 10% for vulnerable, affected

on shops, relocated HHs, vulnerable

groups): the list by communes.

As soon as the DMS

completed by the

DCRC.

Income restoration team

of PMU3 and DCRC.

2. Study about the feasible income

restoration in the localities, livelihood

plan etc. (with detailed information of

Parallels with DMS

activity and after step

1 completed.


of PMU3 and DCRC.

56

# Activity Time schedule Responsible Agency

each possible activity). Consul with

commune, district, provincial relevant

agencies and the DPs for their

feedback to the feasible programs.

3. Based on the feedback of

stakeholders, prepare detailed plans

for activities (list of participants;

organization of implementation;

schedule; budget; monitoring and

evaluation and reporting. Some pilots

programs should be implemented first

to draw the lesions learned for the

subsequent programs.).

After step 2

completed


of PMU3 and DCRC.

Need help of the

commune authorities and

Village Leaders.

4. Set up a Committee to implement and

this committee should include local

NGO (such as Women Union; Farmer

Association etc.); Commune and

District Representative;

Representatives of DPs etc. Training

need to be held for the Committee

prior to the implementation.

At the beginning of

the RP

implementation.

DPCs and CPCs.

5. Implementing the programs After step 3 Implementation

Committee for Income

and Livelihood

Restoration/Improvement.

6. Monitoring and evaluation, reporting Through

implementation phase

Implementation Committee

and External Monitoring

Agency for RP.

6.5. Implementation budget

The cost estimated for income and livelihood restoration/ improvement is calculated according to the

policy of the Government as in Chapter of Cost Estimate.

57

7. CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION, INFPORMATION DISCLOSURE

7.1. Objectives and Policies

The main objectives of consultation and participation are to:

a) Ensure that all DPs and related agencies to participate together in issuing decisions on

involuntary resettlement matters;

b) Minimize negative impacts caused by involuntary resettlement; and

c) Avoid possible conflicts during Project implementation.

DPs shall be fully informed and carefully consulted on resettlement and compensation plans.

Consulting DPs is the starting point for all activities related to resettlement. DPs may be afraid that

they will lose their livelihood and community, or that they are not well prepared for complicated

negotiations on their rights. Participation in creating the RAP and its management will help DPs

relieve their worries and give them the opportunity to participate in what will affect their lives;

implementing resettlement without consulting DPs is an improper and ineffective strategy. If DPs are

properly consulted, any objections to the Project can be timely addressed.

One of the important written documents towards strengthening democracy at the grassroots level

in Vietnam is Instruction No. 30-CT/TW issued by the Central Committee of the Vietnamese

Communist Party on the “Construction and implementation of a basic democratic regime,” and

Decree No. 79/2003/ND-CP on the same topic. The key basis of this legal document is the well-

known slogan: “people know, people discuss, people do, people check.”

Ordinance No. 34/2007/PL-UBTVQH11 (replacing and terminating the effectiveness of Decree

No. 79/2003/ND-CP) points out matters that need comments from local authorities and

communities before the relevant authority issues the decision including the preparation of

approach for compensation, assistance resettlement related to projects and works within the

communes.

Article 39, clause 2 of the 2003 Land law requires matters related to resettlement, such as reasons

and plans for land acquisition, relocation, general compensation and site clearance plans to be

published for DPs.

Even so, consultation and participation is an innovation in project implementation in Vietnam, and

both local residents and officers in charge of project implementation lack experience in this field. The

following points need to be focused on to encourage relevant agencies to participate in the Project's

consultation process:

a. Determining and encouraging all related agencies, and especially DPs, to join in consultation

and participation;

b. Establishing strategies for them to participate in project planning, implementation, monitoring

and evaluation;

58

c. Explaining strategies and details for disseminating necessary information and propaganda, and

establishing procedures to enable DPs to define their entitlements;

d. Attracting related agencies to participate in making decisions at the different steps of Project

implementation (e.g. modes of compensation, consulting DPs on compensation and

implementation schedules, etc);

e. Establishing procedures for redressing grievances.

7.2. Consultation and Participation Procedure

Responsible Organizations: DPs will be informed by PMU about the responsibilities of all

organizations and local governments concerned with resettlement, and the names and functions of

relevant government officers along with their telephone numbers, office addresses and working hours

(if any).

Implementation Schedule: DPs will be informed of the estimated schedule for major resettlement

activities, and that construction can only begin when resettlement activities are completed and DPs

have moved out of the Project area. It is necessary to emphasize that DPs should move timely when

once they receive all compensations for their affected assets. Compensation Councils/Committees at

all levels will be provided with maps and implementation schedules.

7.3. Method for Consultation and Participation

The methods of information dissemination and community consultation may include family

visits, site visits, community meetings, group meetings, focus group discussions, and socio-economic

surveys.

7.3.1. Consultation in the Preparation Phase

At the beginning of the preparation stage, local authorities and other government leaders at various

levels will be informed about the Project, its objectives and activities. They will be consulted and

actively participate in discussions about the demand for development and the priorities in their

hometowns. They can also contribute comments and ideas about possible adverse effects of the Project

and how to mitigate them and increase their community's interest in the Project. Local authorities will

also be consulted about their consensus and commitment to the RPF. The mass media, including

central and local television and the press, will broadcast the Project's objectives, components and

activities in public areas once they have been approved.

Community Meetings: Prior to the detailed design, the Project organizes in each affected commune or

ward to provide more information to DPs. DPs have opportunity to participate in open discussions on

resettlement policies and procedures. Notification or invitations to the DPs should be sent at least two

weeks prior to the meetings. The purpose of these meetings is to clarify information up to the date of

the meeting, create an opportunity for discussion. In addition to letters to individual households,

information should be disseminated through posters in public areas of communes, and rural/urban

districts where DPs are living, and/or via radio, newspapers, to inform DPs and the community. Men

59

and women in affected households and other people in the community are encouraged to participate in

meetings where the Project will be explained, the interests and entitlements of households will be

clarified, there will be the opportunity for people to speak their concerns. Such meetings will be held

periodically during the process of the Project. Textual and visual information will be provided for the

DPs in the meetings and copies of such information will be available in the Districts and concerned

communes in the Project area. The meetings should include:

- Textual and visual explanations, including printed information and tentative drawings of The

Project's for different items.

- Facilitating DPs in expressing their opinions, answering their questions, and encouraging them

to contribute their ideas to the recovery plans.

- DCRCs preparing a complete list of affected households that participate in the meetings.

- DCRCs preparing a comprehensive list of questions, comments, ideas and decisions that arise

during the meetings and consultations and reporting all the meetings to the PMU.

7.3.2. Consultation in the Project Implementation

During the Project's implementation, PMUs shall undertake the following with the support of the

Project consultants:

a) Providing information for DCRCs and communes through training seminars and providing

detailed information about the Project's policies and implementation procedure.

b) Organizing information dissemination and consultation with DPs during Project

implementation.

c) Comparing annual unit prices and the Project's tentative compensation unit prices; and

reaffirming the scale of land acquisition and impacts on assets based on the results of the DMS

and consultations with DPs

d) DPCs will publish Project land acquisition policies and invite affected persons to participate in

popularizing the Project and its legal basis.

e) Each affected person will in turn participate in the measuring and inventory of assets, and land,

and sign on the drawings of the acquired housing/land and inventory of lost assets.

f) Each affected person will be involved in reviewing the draft plan for compensation, the

calculation tables, and the amount of compensation for each affected person.

g) Each affected person has the right to reflect, raise their questions about the calculation of

compensation and have their questions answered satisfactorily according to their specific

situation, including issues related to resettlement such as prices, instalment payments and

procedures for documenting ownership in the new place.

h) Each affected person will participate in the review process for draft compensation plan, spread

sheet and estimate the compensation payment to each affected person.

60

i) The plan for compensating assets shall clearly state affected assets and the compensation to

which DPs are entitled, and this shall be signed by the DPs to show their agreement with the

evaluation results. Any questions DPs have on the contents of the plan shall be noted at this

time.

j) Sending DPs letters and/or questions related to the RP to inform them about the plans and

clearly explain the consequences of each plan, if any.

Affected and vulnerable DPs will be consulted about their desires regarding restoration assistance in

the RP. DCRCs will inform DPs about the plan and their entitlement to technical assistance before

requesting them to clearly present their desires for restoration assistance.

7.4. Information Disclosure

In addition to public announcements for DPs and their communities, the RPs, including Policy are

available in DPCs, CPCs, the Info Shop in Washington, D.C, and the WB's Vietnam Development

Information Centre (VDIC) in Hanoi.

7.5. Community Consultation Results

From January to March-2013, consultant conducted many meetings with relevant organizations.

Many meetings were also held with the DPs before the resettlement team carries out for the SES and

IOL in each affected commune.

The objectives of consultation in phase of preparing for the RP were to initially inform and discuss

with the authorities of the project provinces, districts and communes, affected districts and communes

about the project, objectives and principles on land acquisition, compensation, allowances and special

assistance to poor and vulnerable groups according to the policies of Viet Nam and WB safeguards

policy and requirements, preparation of resettlement plan, schedule for the socioeconomic survey, IOL

and information needs for preparing the RP. The meetings with the DPS and Representatives of

communes focused on the following issues:

General information on the project

Show at the meeting a project map and disclose the list of the project affected districts,

communes; scope of land acquisition and resettlement impacts

Objectives and principles of RP according to the requirements of GOV and the WB’s policy on

social safeguards.

Schedules of socioeconomic survey and IOL

Livelihood restoration

Compensation and relocation modes (options to cash or in kind compensation)

Gender issues in RP;

Mechanisms of participation, complaint, monitoring and evaluation through all phases of RP

preparation and implementation.

61

Plenary session and group discussion, Q&A

Copies of compensation and resettlement pamphlet for the first round of consultation were

distributed to all participants (Pamphlet is attached to this report as Annex 2).

The meetings, venue, time and persons met, participated and pictures of consultation are given as

in Annex 3.

8. COMPLAINT AND GRIEVANCES

Complaints and grievances related to any aspect of the Project will be handled through negotiation

aimed at achieving consensus. According to the Article 138 of land law 2003, Article 63 and Article

64 of this Decree and provisions on settlement of claims in Decree 136/2006/ND-CP and Decree

197/2004/ND-CP, complaints should pass through three stages before they are taken to a court of law

as a last resort. The DPs will be free from any fees for complaints.

The mechanism for complaint and grievance redress is as follows:

a. First Stage - At Commune People’s Committee (CPC)

An aggrieved DP may bring his/her complaint to any member of the CPC, in writing or

verbally. It is incumbent upon said member of CPC to notify the CPC about the complaint.

The CPC will meet personally with the aggrieved DP and will have 15 days following the

lodging of the complaint to resolve it. The CPC secretariat is responsible for documenting and

keeping file of all complaints awaiting at the CPC for settlement.

b. Second Stage - At District People’s Committee (DPC)

If after 15 days the aggrieved DP does not hear from the CPC, or if the CPC gives its

solutions, but DP is not satisfied with the decision taken on his/her complaint, the AP may

bring the case, either in writing or verbally, to any member of DPC or District Compensation

and Site Clearance Committee. The District Compensation and Site Clearance Committee in

turn will have 30 days to resolve the case. The District Compensation and Site Clearance

Committees responsible for documenting and keeping file of all complaints that it handles.

c. Third Stage - At the Provincial People’s Committee (PPC)

If after 30 days the aggrieved DP does not hear from the District Compensation and Site

Clearance Committee, or if the DP is not satisfied with the decision taken on his/her

complaint, the DP may bring the case, either in writing or verbally, to any member of the

Provincial PC. The Provincial PC has 45 days within which to resolve the complaint to the

satisfaction of all concerned. The PPC is also responsible for documenting and keeping file of

all complaints that it handles.

d. Final Stage - Court of Law

If after 45 days following the lodging of the complaint with the PPC, the aggrieved DP does

not hear from the PPC, or if he/she is not satisfied with the decision taken on his/her

62

complaint, the case may be brought to a court of law. The judgment of the Court is the final

results that the concerned parties have to comply with. .

The Project’s Technical Assistant Consultant will provide the necessary training to improve

grievance procedures and strategy for the PMU3 and district staff, if required.

The DCRC will develop and maintain a database of complaints received related to the Project

which will contain the following information: nature of the complaint, source & date of receiving

complaints, name and address of complaint, actions and current status.

DPs are entitled to claim about their rights of compensation, compensation unit price and policies,

land recovery, resettlement and other rights related to restructure support programs. DP’s claims

should be in written documents. DPs will present their own cases to competent agencies of the

people’s committees of districts and communes without any charges or fees.

The project’s grievance redress process will be disseminated through project brochures and project

information listed in the offices of the commune/district people’s committees. The complaint will be

resolved by the DCRC. The investors for the site clearance subprojects shall be responsible for

receiving, processing, tracking and managing these complaints.

9. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

The institutional arrangement for the preparation and implementation of RP is guided by Chapter

VI of the Decree 197/2004-ND-CP and Decree 84/2007-ND-CP and Document No.1665/TTg-CN

dated 17/10/2006. The responsibilities of key parties are described in Decree 197/2004; Decree

84/2007/ND-CP; Decree 69/2009 and in the decisions of the People’s Committees of the project

provinces.

9.1. Provincial People‟s Committee (PPC)

PPC will have the following responsibilities:

a. Carry out the direction, organization, advocacy and mobilization of all organizations and

individuals about the compensation, assistance, and resettlement and implement the site

clearance in accordance with the land acquisition decisions of competent state agencies.

Generate awareness on the project development to all relevant institutions and various

administrative levels within the Province.

b. Direct the district departments and people's committees to:

- Plan resettlement projects, resettlement areas to cater for the acquisition of land.

- Plan compensation, assistance and resettlement under the authority;

c. Approve or decentralize the District People's Committees to approve the compensation,

assistance and resettlement plans;

d. Approve land prices; issue the price table of property compensation, provide assistance levels

and support measures under the authority; provide resettlement plans, training plans for job

change under the authority;

63

e. Approve the unit prices which are detailed in the replacement cost survey report of the

qualified appraisers to facilitate the district compensation and site clearance committees to

complete compensation plans.

f. Instruct relevant agencies to implement the settlement of complaints of citizens on

compensation, assistance and resettlement under the authority prescribed by law;

g. Ensure the objectivity and fairness when considering and deciding the compensation, assistance

and resettlement when the State acquires land under the authority specified in this Decree;

h. Decide or decentralize for the district people's committees to take enforcement for the cases

which deliberately do not comply the land acquisition decisions of the State under the

authority;

i. Direct, inspect and handle violations in compensation, assistance and resettlement.

9.2. The Project Management Unit (PMU3)

The PMU3, through its Environment and Resettlement Team, will have the following key

responsibilities related to resettlement:

a. On behalf of the Employer, prepare RPF and RPs, monitor and supervise the implementation

of RPs of the project provinces.

b. Submit the Resettlement Policy Framework and RP prepared for the project to MOT approve

and waiving requirements if required under the authorization of the Prime Minister to meet

the requirements of the World Bank on involuntary resettlement.

c. Allocate adequate and timely capital for the preparation and implementation of RPs of the

provinces, ensure available funding for RP implementation when the project provinces

require.

d. Collaborate with the project provinces and compensation committees to organize training for

RP implementation and/or workshops on the compensation, assistance and resettlement for

the RP staff and other relevant staff of the project provinces.

e. Subscribe to urge the RP implementation of the District Compensation and Site Clearance

Committees to ensure full implementation of the contents of approved RPs. PMU3 requests

project provinces and DCRC to hand over the clean site for the project to ensure the project

progress and the order of priority.

f. Support the project provinces in the selection of an independent price valuation consultant

qualified and experienced enough to carry out the price appraisal.

g. Report the WB the situation and progress of the RP implementation quarterly. Select and

monitor the implementation of the Independent Resettlement Monitoring Consultant. Carry

out the internal monitoring and evaluating of the RP implementation of the project provinces.

h. Coordinate with the PPCs to timely resolve difficulties in the RP implementation of the

district compensation committees.

64

9.3. District People‟s Committee

a. Directing, organizing, disseminating propaganda and motivating all concerned organizations,

households and individuals to comply with the compensation, assistance, resettlement

policies, and implementing site clearance in accordance with the decision of competent State

agencies;

b. Leading the district compensation and resettlement committees of the same level to plan and

implement the compensation, assistance and resettlement; approving the compensation,

assistance and resettlement plans under the assignment of the PPCs.

c. Coordinating with departments, branches, organizations and the Employer to implement the

construction investment project and plan for construction of resettlement areas under the

assignment of the PPCs.

d. Settling citizens' complaints and grievances regarding compensation, assistance and

resettlement within their competence; making decisions to organize and force site clearance

and land acquisition involving unwilling cases within their power; coordinate with competent

agencies to organize the enforcement under the decision of the authorized agencies.

9.4. District Compensation assistant and resettlement Committees (DCRC)

A DCRC will be headed by a leader of the DPC and the members include the responsible staff of

the Finance Department, the Department of Industry and Trade, the Natural Resources and

Environment Department, the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development and the Employer.

In addition, representatives of the District Fatherland Fronts, Farmers’ Associations, Women’s

Unions, Commune People’s Committees and representatives of the DPs (including female DPs) will

also be invited to the DCRC.

The main responsibilities of the DCRC are as follows:

a. Assist the PPC and DPCs in the dissemination of information on the RP; provide guidance

and answers to land users on the compensation, assistance and resettlement;

b. The DCRC are responsible for the accuracy and reasonableness of the inventory data, the

legality of land and properties which are compensated and supported or are not compensated

and supported according to the resettlement plan; Assign the organizations to implementation

of the compensation, assistance and resettlement; Plan compensation, assistance and

resettlement; organize the implementation of compensation, assistance and resettlement

approved by the competent authorities; conduct consultations and participation activities,

income restoration programs and cooperate with the other stakeholders in the implementation

of the resettlement plan.

c. Carry out payment of compensation, assistance and allowance for DPs after the RP has been

agreed between PMU3 and the WB. Ensure the timely provision of payments for

compensation and support and other benefits for the affected people;

65

d. Organize resettlement for affected households under the project policy

e. Support the DPCs in resolving complaints at the district level.

f. Coordinate with other agencies in the design and implementation of income restoration

measures and relocation of households.

g. Report PMU3 the implementation of the compensation, assistance and resettlement and

complaints and complaints settlement of DPs monthly.

h. Other duties as prescribed by law by the PPCs and in accordance with the agreement with the

Donor.

9.5. Commune People's Committees

The CPC will assist the DCRC in the compensation, assistance and resettlement tasks.

Specifically, the CPC will be responsible for the following:

a. Organize the propaganda on the purpose of land acquisition, compensation, assistance and

resettlement policy of the project;

b. Perform the RP preparation and implementation daily;

c. Establish commune mission teams and assign the tasks for them; assign commune officials to

support the district compensation and site clearance committee in the implementation of the

DMS, preparation of land acquisition documents for the project, preparation and

implementation of resettlement activities;

d. Identify replacement land for affected households which are eligible and propose income

restoration programs in accordance with the conditions of the local people and;

e. Sign the DMS samples, certify legal papers or history of land use, land transfer for the

affected households to carry out the requirements for the preparation of the compensation plan

for them;

f. Settle of complaints and inquiries at the first level as required by law;

g. Actively participate in all land acquisition activities, payment of compensation, support and

resettlement and other related works.

h. Report to the district compensation and site clearance committee on the implementation of

compensation, assistance and resettlement as well as complaints and resolve complaints of

DPs monthly.

9.6. External Monitoring Agency

The independent monitoring can be conducted by a research institution, a university or a NGO,

which is specialized in social sciences. This unit will carry out the socioeconomic surveys,

monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the resettlement plan for the Project. The reports

on reviewing the progress, suitability of the resettlement plans and related proposals should be

prepared periodically.

66

WB

Provincial People‟s

Committee

Directorate for

Roads of Vietnam

(DRVN) –PMU3

Environment and

Resettlement Team

Departments and

District People‟s

Committees

District Compensation

assistant and resettlement

Committee

Commune People's

Committees

DPs, AHs

External

Monitoring

Agency

Coordinate, support

MOT

Direct, lead and feedback

javascript:__doPostBack('ctl20$TreeView1','s977\\978\\1008')



67

10. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT

The implementation process and task are as follows:

a. Preparation of land application procedure for the Project. After obtaining an agreement on

principles between the Government of Viet Nam and the WB on the Loan Agreement, PMU3

will prepare documents and carry out submission procedure to the project Province for

approval on granting land for the Project. This dossier would be needed for the relevant

Decisions related to the project.

b. Establishment of the DCRC. If any district that the DCRC is not yet established, the PPC

will establish DCRC for the Project, and entrust tasks to relevant agencies and entities.

c. Land clearance/boundary setting for the Project. PMU3 will cooperate with the PPCs and

Provincial Department of Natural Resources, Environment to determine the Project land

clearance red line and setting out boundary at the site in close coordination with detailed

design consultants.

d. Training for resettlement staff. After the DCRC have been formed, PMU3, with the help of

project consultants, will develop and implement a training program for implementation of the

RPs. The training will include at least an orientation on the RP, roles of agencies in RP

implementation, progress report preparation, complaint handling/recording/reporting, DP

participation/ consultation, gender-responsive resettlement and resettlement internal

monitoring/ reporting. Target participants to the training include representatives from the

CPCs, DCRC, and DPCs, and local Ngo etc…

e. Engagement of External Monitoring Agency. PMU3 will engage the services of an external

monitoring agency to carry out independent monitoring and evaluation of RP preparation and

implementation activities. Quarterly progress reports will be submitted by the EMA to

PMU3 and the WB.

f. Information campaign before DMS. Before land acquisition, within 90 days in case of

agricultural land and 180 days in case of non-agricultural land, the DCRC must send written

notices to affected land owners to inform the reasons for land acquisition, time and plan of

displacement, compensation/resettlement options, land clearance and resettlement.

o Before inventory and detailed measurement, PMU3 in cooperation with local authorities

of districts and wards will provide Project information to residents in the Project area.

Information will be broadcasted via the public address system of the locality in

combination with other multi-media such as radios, press, television, brochures or letters

delivered to households to be open posted in public areas.

68

o Consultation meetings will be held in the Project affected Communes to notify the

affected community about the scope and scale of the project, impacts, policies and rights

for all kinds of damages, implementation schedule, responsibilities for organization, and

complaint mechanism. Brochures including (images, photos or books) related to Project

implementation will be prepared and delivered to all affected communes in the meetings.

g. Conduct of Replacement Cost Survey by a Qualified Appraiser. If there is a significant

difference between compensation price enacted by the PPCs and market price as per

replacement cost survey carried out by a qualified appraiser, the PPCs will update the

compensation unit price according to regulations and implementation guidance of Decree

No.197/2004/CP, 17/2006/ND-CP.

h. Detailed Measurement Survey. DMS will be undertaken once detailed design is finalized.

These surveys will be the basis for the preparation of compensation plan.

i. Preparation of Compensation Plan. DCRCs are responsible for applying prices and

preparing compensation tables for each affected commune/hamlet. The People’s Committees

of districts will appraise these tables in respect of approved compensation prices, quantities

of affected assets, allowances and special assistance that the Project DPs are entitled to. The

unit rates are presented to the DPs and posted in the commune offices. All tables of

compensation price application for individual DP must be checked and signed by DP to

prove their consensus.

j. Preparation of Income Restoration Measures and Relocation Plan. DCRCs and the

organizations responsible for the planning and implementation of the income restoration or

livelihood program with the assistance of project consultants will carry out needs assessment

to design suitable income restoration measures and relocation plan for severely affected and

vulnerable households.

k. Issuance of Notice-to-Proceed (NTP) for Specific Sections. PMU3 will not issue a notice of

possession of site for any section (bidding package) until the head of DCRC has officially

confirmed in writing that (i) payment has been fully disbursed to the DPs and rehabilitation

measures are in place; (ii) already-compensated affected persons have cleared the area in a

timely manner; and (iii) the area is free from any encumbrances.

l. Monitoring and evaluation. Internal monitoring and external monitoring and evaluation will

be implemented from RP preparation to implementation. Grievances received will be

addressed through the grievance redress mechanism set up for the project.

The tasks and proposed implementation schedule respectively are described as in table below

69

Table 33: Implementation Schedule for the RP

Activity Schedule

1.RP preparation, review and approve by GOV and the WB From Q1 to Q3- 2013

2. Implementation mobilization (information disclose, institutional

arrangement, capacity building for implementation, recruit the

consultant for RCS and external monitoring and evaluation, prepare a

detailed schedule of implementing the RP by each project district,

including the budget need for each month of the years etc.).

Q4-2013

3. Marks demarcation for the land acquisition need on the ground and

declare the project areas to local authorities and local people as well as

to DPs.

Q1-2014

4. Approval of land acquisition for the project by the PPCs and decision

on land recovery from the DPCs to the DPs. Q1-2014

5. Carry out the DMS, RCS and prepare entitlement to DP

(compensation, assistance and resettlement plan for each HH), disclose

the plans at the communes as per request of the law; submit

compensation, assistance and resettlement plan for each HH to the

relevant Departments of the District and Province for their review and

then get either PPC’s or DPC’s approval which depends on the

arrangement of each Province. Disclose the approved plans at each

commune for the DP and commune authorities to check as per

requirement of the law.

Q2 to Q3-2014

6. Payment to the DPs Q3-2014

7. Plot allocation to the HHs who have to relocate, movement of the

HHs to new sites/ Q3 to Q4-2014

8. Design income restoration activities based on the consultation with

DPs and other stakeholders and implement the activities for the DP who

opt to the activities instead of cash payment for self-restoration.

Q2 to Q4-2014

9. Monitoring and evaluation of RP implementation Q1-2013 to Q1-2015

10. Settling for the complaints Through entire of RP

Implementation

11. Periodical reports on the implementation. Each Quarter

70

11. MONITORING AND EVALUATION

11.1. Internal Resettlement Monitoring

1. Internal Monitoring is the responsibility of PMU3 and DCRC with support from the project

consultants. Internal resettlement monitoring aims to:

a. Ensure that payment of compensation to affected people is provided based on the type of

losses and categories of impacts

b. Ensure that resettlement activities are conducted according to the compensation policies as

per agreed RP. Monitor the assistance from local authorities and communities in helping

the households whose houses are partially or fully affected, and who have to buy land to

move to or have to repair their partly affected houses.

c. Determine if the required transition, income restoration measures and relocation assistance

are provided on time.

d. Assess if income source recovery and recovery support have been provided and propose

remedial measures if objectives of restoring income of households have not been met.

e. Disseminate information and procedures openly

f. Determine if complaint procedures are followed and if there are pending issues that require

management attention.

g. Give priority to DPs' concerns and needs, specially the poor and vulnerable households

h. Ensure that the transition between relocation or site clearing and commencement of civil

works is smooth and that sites are not handed over for civil works until affected households

have been satisfactorily compensated, assisted and relocated.

2. PMU3, through its Environment and Resettlement Team, will submit quarterly monitoring

reports to the WB. Internal monitoring reports will include but not limited to the following

information:

a. Number of affected households and categories, status of compensation payment and

relocation of DPs.

b. Status of disbursement of compensation payment to DPs.

c. Status of income restoration planning and implementation issues

d. Results of complaint handling and any pending issues that require management attention

and action

e. Concerns and needs raised by severely affected households, vulnerable groups and how

these concerns are being addressed.

11.2. External Resettlement Monitoring

The main objective of external resettlement monitoring is to provide an independent periodic

review and assessment of (i) achievement of resettlement objectives; (ii) changes in living standards

71

and livelihoods; (iii) restoration of the economic and social base of the DPs; (iv) effectiveness and

sustainability of entitlements; and (v) the need for further mitigation measures as required.

The external resettlement monitoring address specific issues such as the following:

(i) Public consultation and awareness of resettlement policy and entitlements;

(ii) Documentation of impacts and payments (DMS forms, compensation documents,) as per

agreed RP;

(iii) Coordination of resettlement activities with construction schedule;

(iv) Land acquisition and transfer procedures;

(v) Construction/rebuilding of replacement houses and structures on residual land or to new

relocation sites; Monitor the assistance from local authorities and communities in

helping the households whose houses are partially or fully affected, who have to buy

land to move to or have to repair the partly affected houses;

(vi) Level of satisfaction of DPs with the provisions and implementation of the RPs;

(vii) Grievance redress mechanism (documentation, process, resolutions, complaint issues

etc.);

(viii) Effectiveness, impact and sustainability of entitlements and rehabilitation measures and

the need for further improvement, as required; Implementation of the livelihood

restoration activities and evaluation of the restoration or improvement level. Propose the

need for the improvement if there are households who are worse off.

(ix) Gender impacts and strategy;

(x) Capacity of DPs to restore/re-establish livelihoods and living standards. Special

attention provided or to be provided to severely affected and vulnerable households;

(xi) Resettlement impacts caused during construction activities;

(xii) Participation of DPs in RP planning, updating and implementation;

(xiii) Institutional capacity, internal monitoring and reporting.

(xiv) Information of government’s funds for payment of land, non-land assets and allowances

to the affected households (if being implemented) should be transparent, efficient and

effective.

Monitoring of RP implementation will be based on desk review and field visits, meetings with

various ministries and local officials, and affected households. Separate meetings will be held with

women and vulnerable households.

Between 6 to 12 months following completion of resettlement, the external resettlement

monitoring consulting services will conduct an evaluation study to determine whether or not the

objectives of resettlement have been achieved. The methodology for the evaluation study will be

72

based mainly on a comparison of the socio-economic status of severely affected households prior to

and following displacement. If the findings of the study would indicate that the objectives of the RP

have not been achieved, the EMA will propose appropriate additional measures to meet the RP

objectives. Activities will include the following:

Evaluate baseline data that was collected under the socio-economic survey to assess

changes in: household income and expenditures, expenditure composition patters, primary

and secondary occupations, borrowing amounts and debts patterns, materials conditions

and possessions of consumer items, land area and tenure arrangements, school attendance

of children, child malnutrition and general health, and distances to public services and

infrastructure.

Collect qualitative indicators on the DPs' own assessment of changes in living standards

before and after the project at households and community levels, which may be collected

through open-ended questions, semi-structured interviews, case-studies, or group

discussions employing a range of PRA tools and methods.

Verify with the APs that community services and resources damaged during construction

works have been fully restored to their previous conditions and operational capacity.

The external resettlement monitoring will be undertaken by an international consulting firm or a

national consulting firm composed of international and national experts. Monitoring will be carried

out on a semi-annual basis and semi-annual monitoring reports will be submitted to PMU3. The

quarterly reports will highlight the issues and problems arising and, if required, suggest time-bound

and specific mitigation measures. In terms of submission, reports will be submitted to PMU3 as

follows:

a. A brief inception report to be submitted within two weeks after completion of the inception activity.

b. Compliance monitoring reports and final monitoring report within two weeks after

completion of the monitoring activity.

c. Post- evaluation report will be submitted within two weeks after completion of the

monitoring activity.

12. COST AND BUDGET

12.1. Principles

The affected households will be compensated based on the principle of replacement cost plus

with resettlement assistance and assistance for the livelihood restoration/ improvement.

The replacement cost study is required and in order to make sure that the cost estimate for this

RP is bases the replacement costs. Before RPs implementation the updated and further detailed

study on the replacement costs will be done and then be reviewed/ approved by the project

73

provincial authorities before using to calculate for the compensation package for the affected

persons.

The compensation will be paid to the project DPs based on the following principles:

(i) Productive Land (agricultural, aquaculture, garden and forest) based on current market

prices that reflect recent land sales in the project area or, in the absence of such recent sales, based

on recent sales in adjacent or other locations with comparable attributes, or in the absence of such

sales, based on productive value;

(ii) Residential land based on current market prices that reflect recent land sales or, in the

absence of such recent land sales, based on prices of recent sales in other locations with comparable

attributes;

(iii) Houses and other fixed structures based on current market prices of materials and labor

without depreciation or deduction for salvaged building materials;

(iv) Annual crops equivalent to the prevailing market value of crops at the time of

compensation;

(v) Perennial crops, cash compensation equivalent to their current market value given the type,

age and productive value (future production) at the time of compensation.

(vi) Timber trees based on the type and breast height at current market prices.

12.2. Replacement Cost Survey

The Replacement Cost Survey for this RP was carried out by consultant in early 2013. These

costs are used for the purpose of preparing cost estimates for the RP.

To do the survey for the replacement cost, the survey teams carried out for the following works

including site visit to the project localities.

(i) Desk study the implications of the national legal orders to the compensation principles when

the Government. acquires land for the purposes of national, defence, public works and economic

developments such as Land law 2003; Decrees No. 197/2004/ND-CP; 123/2007/ND-CP; Decree

69/2009; amending Decree No.188/2004/ND-CP, dated 16 November 2004; Circulars 116 and

114/2004 of MOF on price determination method and price frame for different kinds of land as well

as the policies on compensation and resettlement assistance of the project provinces.

(ii) Meet with DOF, DONRE, DOC, MARD of the Project provinces. The teams interviewed

and obtained the comments from the above mentioned departments of the provinces and districts

about the current costs which are using to compensate for the DPs by land acquisition in their

localities.

(iii) Interviewed different local officials (DCRC and leaders of selected communes) as well as

local people on the current market rates of land in their districts and commune localities. For

communes that have no active market for non-residential land in the project communes, based on

74

other empirical facts, such as productive and location attributes, discuss and determine for the

replacement values for non-residential land.

(iv) Canvass of construction materials from the local suppliers, construction material shops in

the selected districts and communes, interviewed designers of local design and construction

companies, local contractors and local builders in the selected districts, communes to learn about the

current costs of materials, labor and cost of construction for buildings and other popular

substructures such as houses class 1, class 2, class 4, class 5 and temporary structures, fence, well,

yards etc.,

(v) Meet with vendors and agriculture specialists in the selected districts and communes,

including officials of the Department of Agriculture in the districts, to learn about and to establish

the current market rates of perennial and annual crops; wooden trees, fruit trees.

(vi) Analysed the results of survey and define the unit costs for compensating fixed assets (land,

structures), perennial and annual crops affected by the project in the selected communes.

Detailed results of survey on the substitution cost in each commune under process and would be

attached to the final report as Annex 4.

12.3. Proposed compensation unit prices

The Land compensation unit prices proposed for project are stated in below table. Other prices

are in attached Annex 4

Table 34: Land compensation unit prices proposed for project

No. Item Average unit price

Proposed

I Residential land

1 Tan Le commune 4,000,000

2 Hung Nhan town 7,000,000

3 Tan Hoa commune 3,000,000

4 Lien Hiep commune 3,000,000

5 Phuc Khanh commune 4,500,000

6 Thai Phuong commune 4,000,000

7 Hung Ha town 11,000,000

8 Minh Khai commune 7,000,000

9 Hong Linh commune 4,000,000

II.1 Annual crop land 46,000

II.2 Perennial tree land 50,000

III Fish pond land 46,000

75

12.4. Cost Estimates

The cost estimates for RP are including:

(a). Compensation for land and all kinds of assets on land and for both individual households

and public assets.

(b). All kinds of assistance (for income restoration/ improvement and for resettlement). With

payment of replacement cost for agricultural land, no assistance to land according to Decree 69/2009

is taken into account. The assistance is described as in table below.

(c). Cost for the resettlement site development would be refunded from the DPs, but assumes

that it would need to add to 20% of total compensation for residential land to improve for the sites.

(d). Cost of RP implementation (admin; putting the bench marks on the ground; cadastral map;

cost for DMS, for the commune working Teams, for consultation etc.): Take 2% from the total

compensation and assistance cost.

(e). Contingency: Takes 35% from the total cost of compensation, resettlement and assistance.

All detailed calculation of each item for the cost as tables below.

Table 35: Cost estimate for compensation and resettlement based on the replacement values

No. Item Quantity Average

unit Cost

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

A Compensation for land 13,639 - 65,272,453,880

I Residential land 13,447 64,338,260,000

1 Tan Le commune 1,278 4,000,000 5,112,000,000

2 Hung Nhan town 2,667 7,000,000 18,666,900,000

3 Tan Hoa commune 1,353 3,000,000 4,057,500,000

4 Lien Hiep commune 4,390 3,000,000 13,170,120,000

5 Phuc Khanh commune 1,099 4,500,000 4,947,300,000

6 Thai Phuong commune - 4,000,000 -

7 Hung Ha town 802 11,000,000 8,825,300,000

8 Minh Khai commune 709 7,000,000 4,960,900,000

9 Hong Linh commune 1,150 4,000,000 4,598,240,000

II.1 Annual crop land 19,489 46,000 896,506,880

II.2 Perennial tree land 577 50,000 28,855,000

III Fish pond land 192 46,000 8,832,000

B Compensation for buildings 805 2,684,530,000 See Tab.

35.2

1 Tan Le commune 34 2,500,000 84,500,000

2 Hung Nhan town 152 - 379,000,000

3 Tan Hoa commune 251 3,920,431 982,460,000

4 Lien Hiep commune 325 3,474,361 1,128,820,000

76


unit Cost

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

5 Phuc Khanh commune - - -

6 Thai Phuong commune - - -

7 Hung Ha town 35 2,500,000 87,500,000

8 Minh Khai commune 9 - 22,250,000

9 Hong Linh commune - - -

C Compensation for sub-

structures 6,825 2.335.950.000

See Tab.

35.3

1 Tan Le commune 824 211,833 174,550,000

2 Hung Nhan town 620 461,742 286,280,000

3 Tan Hoa commune 1,053 1,784,644 1,879,230,000

4 Lien Hiep commune 1,852 254,390 471,130,000

5 Phuc Khanh commune 937 334,248 313,190,000


7 Hung Ha town 368 214,538 78,950,000

8 Minh Khai commune 550 210,545 115,800,000

9 Hong Linh commune 621 286,345 177,820,000

D Compensation for trees 596 84,676,000 See Tab.35.4

1 Tan Le commune 77 179,545 13,825,000

2 Hung Nhan town 74 120,473 8,915,000

3 Tan Hoa commune 31 76,452 2,370,000

4 Lien Hiep commune 145 178,938 25,946,000



7 Hung Ha town 38 163,684 6,220,000


9 Hong Linh commune 42 153,571 6,450,000

E Compensation for crops 8,941 53,418,000 See Tab.35.5

1 Tan Le commune 413 6,000 2,478,000

2 Hung Nhan town 1,942 5,883 11,424,000

3 Tan Hoa commune - - -

4 Lien Hiep commune 5,425 6,000 32,550,000

5 Phuc Khanh commune - - -

6 Thai Phuong commune 449 6,000 2,694,000

7 Hung Ha town - - -


9 Hong Linh commune 100 6,000 600,000

77


unit Cost

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

F Compensation for public

works 10,779 4,612,460,000 See Tab.35.6

1 Tan Le commune 1,959 86,175 168,826,000

2 Hung Nhan town 1,653 554,783 916,778,200

3 Tan Hoa commune 129 496,124 64,000,000

4 Lien Hiep commune 198 432,323 85,600,000


6 Thai Phuong commune 718 132,312 95,000,000

7 Hung Ha town 339 5,015,915 1,701,900,000

8 Minh Khai commune 504 1,131,573 570,425,800

9 Hong Linh commune 3,659 67,673 247,583,000

10 Tan Le commune 1,287 47,632 61,302,000

11 Hung Nhan town 365 1,875,000 684,375,000

G Allowances 2,671,022,000 See Tab.35.7

1 Tan Le commune - - 79,435,000

2 Hung Nhan town - - 577,921,000

3 Tan Hoa commune - - 39,680,000

4 Lien Hiep commune - - 1,171,636,000

5 Phuc Khanh commune - - 489,492,000

6 Thai Phuong commune - - 45,861,000

7 Hung Ha town - - 21,200,000

8 Minh Khai commune - - 107,309,000

9 Hong Linh commune - - 138,488,000

H Subtotal (A+…+G) 41.931 77.714.509.880

I Administration and

implementation (2% from E) 1.554.290.198

K

Cost subsidize to the

relocation site development

(20% from A)

12.867.652.000

L External monitoring 1.252.592.000 See Tab.35.8

M Subtotal (H+I+K+L) 93.389.044.078

N Contingency (physical and

inflation) (35% from M) 32.686.165.427

Grand total (VND) 126.075.209.505

Grand total (USD) 6.003.581

The budget for RP (All items as calculated above) will be from the Government of Viet Nam

(Counterpart Fund). External monitoring cost would be from IDA.

78

Table 35. 1: Breakdown by commune

No. Commune Compensation Allowances

Resettlement

(20% Residential

land)

Implementation Monitoring Contingency Total

(1) (2) (3)

(4)= 2%

[(1)+(2)] (5)

(6)=35%[(1)+ (2)+

(3)+(4)+(5)] (7)

I Hung Ha district,

Thai Binh province 74,297,810,880 2,671,022,000 12,867,652,000 1,539,376,658 1,024,848,000 32,340,248,338 124,740,957,876

1 Tan Le commune 5,575,269,000 79,435,000 1,022,400,000 113,094,080 113,872,000 2,416,424,528 9,320,494,608

2 Hung Nhan town 20,553,792,800 577,921,000 3,733,380,000 422,634,276 113,872,000 8,890,560,027 34,292,160,103

3 Tan Hoa commune 5,839,460,000 39,680,000 811,500,000 117,582,800 113,872,000 2,422,733,180 9,344,827,980

4 Lien Hiep commune 15,455,332,080 1,171,636,000 2,634,024,000 332,539,362 113,872,000 6,897,591,205 26,604,994,646

5 Phuc Khanh

commune 5,310,322,000 489,492,000 989,460,000 115,996,280 113,872,000 2,456,699,798 9,475,842,078

6 Thai Phuong

commune 118,329,600 45,861,000 - 3,283,812 113,872,000 98,471,244 379,817,656

7 Hung Ha town 10,699,870,000 21,200,000 1,765,060,000 214,421,400 113,872,000 4,485,048,190 17,299,471,590

8 Minh Khai commune 5,704,695,400 107,309,000 992,180,000 116,240,088 113,872,000 2,462,003,771 9,496,300,259

9 Hong Linh commune 5,040,740,000 138,488,000 919,648,000 103,584,560 113,872,000 2,210,716,396 8,527,048,956

II Dong Hung district,

Thai Binh province 61,302,000 - - 1,226,040 113,872,000 61,740,014 238,140,054

1 Minh Tan commune 61,302,000 - - 1,226,040 113,872,000 61,740,014 238,140,054

III Tien Lu district,

Hung Yen province 684,375,000 - - 13,687,500 113,872,000 284,177,075 1,096,111,575

1 Thien Phien

commune 684,375,000 - - 13,687,500 113,872,000 284,177,075 1,096,111,575

Total (VND) 75,043,487,880 2,671,022,000 12,867,652,000 1,554,290,198 1,252,592,000 32,686,165,427 126,075,209,505

Total (USD) 3,573,499.42 127,191.52 612,745.33 74,013.82 59,647.24 1,556,484.07 6,003,581

Funded by GOV GOV GOV GOV IDA GOV GOV+IDA

79

Table 35. 2: Compensation for buildings

No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost

(VND)

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

1 Tan Le

33.8

84,500,000

House with 1 floor VND/m2 floor 33.8 2,500,000 84,500,000

House with 2 floor VND/m2 floor - 3,600,000 -



Temporary house VND/m2 floor - 2,500,000 -

2 Hung Nhan town

151.6

379,000,000


House with 2 floor VND/m2 floor

3,600,000 -




3 Tan Hoa

250.6

982,460,000






4 Lien Hiep

324.9

1,128,820,000




House with 4 floor VND/m2 floor

4,300,000 -

Temporary house VND/m2 floor

2,500,000 -

5 Phuc Khanh

-

-






80


(VND)

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

6 Thai Phuong

-

-






7 Hung Ha town

35.0

87,500,000






8 Minh Khai

8.9

22,250,000






9 Hong Linh

-

-






Total

804.8

2,684,530,000

81

Table 35. 3: Compensation for substructures


(VND)

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

I Tan Le

824

174,550,000

1 Affected kitchen outside house VND/m2 - 2,500,000 -

2 Affected cow shed VND/m2 - 1,200,000 -

3 Affected power meter VND/unit - 100,000 -

4 Affected fence VND/m2 - 80,000 -

5 Affected gate VND/m2 22 220,000 4,840,000

6 Affected toilet VND/m2 - 8,600,000 -

7 Affected well VND/unit 1 1,500,000 1,500,000

8 Affected tank VND/m3 - 1,500,000 -

9 Brick yard VND/m2 801 210,000 168,210,000

10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -

II Hung Nhan town

620

286,280,000

1 Affected kitchen outside house VND/m2 60 2,500,000 150,000,000


3 Affected power meter VND/unit 1 100,000 100,000

4 Affected fence VND/m2 30 80,000 2,400,000





9 Brick yard VND/m2 444 210,000 93,240,000

10 Fish pond VND/m3 40 670,000 26,800,000

III Tan Hoa

1,053

718,230,000


2 Affected cow shed VND/m2 10 1,200,000 12,000,000


82


(VND)

Total Cost

(VND) Notes



6 Affected toilet VND/m2 15 8,600,000 129,000,000


8 Affected tank VND/m3 20 1,500,000 30,000,000

9 Brick yard VND/m2 275 210,000 57,750,000

10 Fish pond VND/m3 298 670,000 199,660,000

IV Lien Hiep

1,852

471,130,000









9 Brick yard VND/m2 1,509 210,000 316,890,000

10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -

V Phuc Khanh

937

313,190,000







7 Affected well VND/unit - 1,500,000 -


83


(VND)

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

9 Brick yard VND/m2 449 210,000 94,290,000

10 Fish pond VND/m3 200 670,000 134,000,000

VI Thai Phuong

-

-





5 Affected gate VND/m2 - 220,000 -




9 Brick yard VND/m2 - 210,000 -

10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -

VII Hung Ha town

368

78,950,000









9 Brick yard VND/m2 329 210,000 69,090,000

10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -

VIII Minh Khai

550

115,800,000



84


(VND)

Total Cost

(VND) Notes







9 Brick yard VND/m2 520 210,000 109,200,000

10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -

IX Hong Linh

621

177,820,000








8 Affected tank VND/m3 1 1,500,000 1,500,000

9 Brick yard VND/m2 568 210,000 119,280,000

10 Fish pond VND/m3 - 670,000 -

Total

6,825

2,335,950,000

85

Table 35. 4: Compensation for trees

No. Item Unit Quantity Unit

Cost

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

I Tan Le

77

13,825,000

1 Longan (diameter 20-

25cm) VND/tree 36 235,000 8,460,000

2 Litchi VND/tree - 235,000 -

3 Jackfruit VND/tree 1 120,000 120,000

4 “Doi” VND/tree - 170,000 -

5 Mango VND/tree 2 170,000 340,000

6 “Na” VND/tree - 170,000 -

7 Guava VND/tree 5 210,000 1,050,000

8 Banana VND/clump - 35,000 -

9 Grapefruit VND/tree 5 170,000 850,000

10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -

11 “Bang” VND/tree 3 180,000 540,000

12 “Xanh” VND/tree 21 100,000 2,100,000

13 “Si” VND/tree 1 80,000 80,000

14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree 3 95,000 285,000

15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree - 60,000 -

16 Peach VND/tree - 60,000 -

17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -

18 Sapodilla VND/tree - 170,000 -

II Hung Nhan town

74

8,915,000


25cm) VND/tree 21 235,000 4,935,000


3 Jackfruit VND/tree - 120,000 -

4 “Doi” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000

5 Mango VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000

86


Cost

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

6 “Na” VND/tree - 170,000 -

7 Guava VND/tree - 210,000 -

8 Banana VND/clump 30 35,000 1,050,000


10 “Xoan” VND/tree 1 140,000 140,000

11 “Bang” VND/tree 1 180,000 180,000

12 “Xanh” VND/tree 6 100,000 600,000

13 “Si” VND/tree 6 80,000 480,000

14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree - 95,000 -



17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -


III Tan Hoa

31

2,370,000


25cm) VND/tree 2 235,000 470,000



4 “Doi” VND/tree - 170,000 -

5 Mango VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000

6 “Na” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000

7 Guava VND/tree 1 210,000 210,000

8 Banana VND/clump 22 35,000 770,000

9 Grapefruit VND/tree - 170,000 -

10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -

11 “Bang” VND/tree - 180,000 -

12 “Xanh” VND/tree - 100,000 -

13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -

87


Cost

Total Cost

(VND) Notes




17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -


IV Lien Hiep

145

25,946,000


25cm) VND/tree 62 235,000 14,570,000

2 Litchi VND/tree 12 235,000 2,820,000


4 “Doi” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000

5 Mango VND/tree 8 170,000 1,360,000

6 “Na” VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000

7 Guava VND/tree 7 210,000 1,470,000

8 Banana VND/clump 21 35,000 735,000


10 “Xoan” VND/tree 4 140,000 560,000

11 “Bang” VND/tree 9 180,000 1,620,000

12 “Xanh” VND/tree 6 100,000 600,000

13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -


15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree 1 60,000 60,000


17 “Lan” VND/tree 1 21,000 21,000

18 Sapodilla VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000

V Phuc Khanh

170

16,930,000


25cm) VND/tree 21 235,000 4,935,000

88


Cost

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

2 Litchi VND/tree 4 235,000 940,000


4 “Doi” VND/tree - 170,000 -

5 Mango VND/tree 4 170,000 680,000

6 “Na” VND/tree - 170,000 -


8 Banana VND/clump 80 35,000 2,800,000

9 Grapefruit VND/tree

170,000 -

10 “Xoan” VND/tree 18 140,000 2,520,000

11 “Bang” VND/tree 12 180,000 2,160,000

12 “Xanh” VND/tree 16 100,000 1,600,000

13 “Si” VND/tree 8 80,000 640,000

14 “Loc Vung” VND/tree 5 95,000 475,000


16 Peach VND/tree 1 60,000 60,000

17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -


VI Thai Phuong

-

-


25cm) VND/tree - 235,000 -



4 “Doi” VND/tree - 170,000 -

5 Mango VND/tree - 170,000 -

6 “Na” VND/tree - 170,000 -




89


Cost

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -

11 “Bang” VND/tree - 180,000 -

12 “Xanh” VND/tree - 100,000 -

13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -




17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -


VII Hung Ha town

38

6,220,000


25cm) VND/tree 19 235,000 4,465,000



4 “Doi” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000

5 Mango VND/tree 2 170,000 340,000

6 “Na” VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000


8 Banana VND/clump 11 35,000 385,000


10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -

11 “Bang” VND/tree 1 180,000 180,000

12 “Xanh” VND/tree - 100,000 -

13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -




17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -

90


Cost

Total Cost

(VND) Notes


VIII Minh Khai

19

4,020,000


25cm) VND/tree 12 235,000 2,820,000



4 “Doi” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000

5 Mango VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000

6 “Na” VND/tree 1 170,000 170,000




10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -

11 “Bang” VND/tree 1 180,000 180,000

12 “Xanh” VND/tree - 100,000 -

13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -




17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -


IX Hong Linh

42

6,450,000


25cm) VND/tree 10 235,000 2,350,000

2 Litchi VND/tree 2 235,000 470,000


4 “Doi” VND/tree - 170,000 -

5 Mango VND/tree 3 170,000 510,000

91


Cost

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

6 “Na” VND/tree 2 170,000 340,000

7 Guava VND/tree 1 210,000 210,000

8 Banana VND/clump 2 35,000 70,000


10 “Xoan” VND/tree - 140,000 -

11 “Bang” VND/tree 4 180,000 720,000

12 “Xanh” VND/tree 16 100,000 1,600,000

13 “Si” VND/tree - 80,000 -


15 “Hoa sua” VND/tree 1 60,000 60,000


17 “Lan” VND/tree - 21,000 -


Total

596

84,676,000

92

Table 35. 5: Compensation for crops


Cost

Total Cost

(VND) Notes

I Tan Le

413

2,478,000

1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -

2 Rice VND/m2 413 6,000 2,478,000

II Hung Nhan town

1,942

11,424,000

1 Corn VND/m2 228 5,000 1,140,000

2 Rice VND/m2 1,714 6,000 10,284,000

III Tan Hoa

-

-

1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -

2 Rice VND/m2 - 6,000 -

IV Lien Hiep

5,425

32,550,000

1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -

2 Rice VND/m2 5,425 6,000 32,550,000

V Phuc Khanh

-

-

1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -

2 Rice VND/m2 - 6,000 -

VI Thai Phuong

449

2,694,000

1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -

2 Rice VND/m2 449 6,000 2,694,000

VII Hung Ha town

-

-

1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -

2 Rice VND/m2 - 6,000 -

VIII Minh Khai

612

3,672,000

1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -

2 Rice VND/m2 612 6,000 3,672,000

IX Hong Linh

100

600,000

1 Corn VND/m2 - 5,000 -

2 Rice VND/m2 100 6,000 600,000

Total

8,941

53,418,000

93

Table 35. 6: Compensation for public works

No. Commune Owner Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

(VND)

1. Tan Le

Subtotal

1,959.1

168,826,000.0

Residential land CPC m2 - 1,875,000

Specific use land Trieu Duong

post office m

2 13.4 1,875,000 25,125,000

Religious land CPC m2 - 938,000

Cemetery land CPC m2 - 938,000

Other non-agricultural

land CPC m

2 - 938,000 -

Annual crop land CPC m2 23.7 46,000 1,090,200

Perennial tree land CPC m2 568.7 50,000 28,435,000

Fish pond land CPC m2 - 46,000 -

Irrigation canal land CPC m2 1,247.3 46,000 57,375,800

Electric pole Hung Ha

Power Service pole 26.0 2,000,000 52,000,000

Electric wire Hung Ha

Power Service m 80.0 60,000 4,800,000

2. Hung

Nhan town

Subtotal

1,652.5

916,778,200.0

Residential land CPC m2 125.8 6,250,000 786,250,000

Specific use land CPC m2 - 6,250,000 -

Religious land CPC m2 - 3,125,000 -

Cemetery land CPC m2 - 3,125,000 -


land CPC m

2 - 3,125,000 -

Annual crop land CPC m2 1,376.7 46,000 63,328,200

Perennial tree land CPC m2 - 50,000 -


Irrigation canal land CPC m2 - 46,000 -




Power Service m 120.0 60,000 7,200,000

3. Tan Hoa

Subtotal

129.0

64,000,000.0

Residential land CPC m2 - 1,000,000 -


94


(VND)

Religious land CPC m2 - 500,000 -

Cemetery land CPC m2

500,000 -


land CPC m

2 - 500,000 -

Annual crop land CPC m2 - 46,000 -







Power Service m 100.0 60,000 6,000,000

4. Lien

Hiep

Subtotal

198.0

85,600,000.0

Residential land CPC m2 - 875,000 -

Specific use land CPC m2 - 875,000 -



437,500 -


land CPC m

2 - 437,500 -








Power Service m 160.0 60,000 9,600,000

5. Phuc

Khanh

Subtotal

333.4

16,670,000.0





1,562,500 -


land CPC m

2 - 1,562,500 -

95


(VND)






Power Service pole 12.0 2,000,000


Power Service m 60.0 60,000 3,600,000

6. Thai

Phuong

Subtotal

718.0

95,000,000.0






land CPC m

2 - 1,250,000 -








Power Service m 60.0 60,000 3,600,000

7. Hung

Ha town

Subtotal

339.3

1,701,900,000.0


Specific use land CPC m2 114.0 10,000,000 1,140,000,000




land CPC m

2 95.3 5,000,000 476,500,000





96


(VND)




Power Service m 90.0 60,000 5,400,000

8. Minh

Khai

Subtotal

504.1

570,425,800.0


Specific use land CPC m2 137.0 3,750,000 513,750,000




land CPC m

2 - 1,875,000 -


Perennial tree land CPC m2 2.3 50,000 115,000






Power Service m 50.0 60,000 3,000,000

9. Hong

Linh

Subtotal

3,658.5

247,583,000.0




Cemetery land CPC m2 - 625,000 -


land CPC m

2 - 625,000 -

Annual crop land CPC m2 3,535.5 46,000 162,633,000

Perennial tree land CPC m2 3.0 50,000 150,000






Power Service m 80.0 60,000 4,800,000

97


(VND)

10. Minh

Tân

Subtotal

1,287.0

61,302,000.0




Cemetery land CPC m2 - 625,000 -


land CPC m

2 - 625,000 -




Irrigation canal land CPC m2 122.0 46,000 5,612,000


Power Service pole - 2,000,000 -


Power Service m - 60,000 -

11.Thien

Phien, Tien

Lu, Hung

Yen

province

Subtotal

365.0

684,375,000.0

Residential land CPC m2

1,875,000

Specific use land CPC m2 365.0 1,875,000 684,375,000

Religious land CPC m2

938,000

Cemetery land CPC m

2

938,000


land CPC m

2

938,000 -

Annual crop land CPC m2

46,000 -

Perennial tree land CPC m2

50,000 -

Fish pond land CPC m2

46,000 -

Irrigation canal land CPC m2

46,000 -

Electric pole Tien Lu Power

Service pole

2,000,000 -

Electric wire Tien Lu Power

Service m

60,000 -

Total

11,143.9

4,612,460,000.0

98

Table 35. 7: Allowances

No. Item Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Cost (VND) Notes

1 Tan Le

79,435,000

1.1 Moving within a Province VND/HH 2 5,000,000 10,000,000

Article 14, Decision 16/2009/QĐ-

UBND of Thai Binh and Article 18,

Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP

1.2 Assistance for renting house VND/HH 2 4,200,000 8,400,000

Item 3, Article 14, Decision

16/2009/QĐ-UBND and item 3,

Article 18, Decree 69/2009/NĐ-CP

1.3 Assistance for stabilizing the livelihood

Item 1(b); Article 16, Decision

16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Article 20,


1.3.1 Acquiring with from 10% to 30% and from

30% to70% of agricultural land Per head

a Do not have to move house

5 2,880,000 14,400,000

b Have to move house to new place

- 5,760,000 -

1.3.2 Acquiring more than 70% of total agricultural

land Per head


- 5,760,000 -


- 11,520,000 -

1.4 Assistance for changing jobs and

employment VND/m

2 415 69,000 28,635,000

Item 1 (a); Article 18, Decision

16/2009/QĐ-UBND of Thai Binh and


1.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 - 2,000,000 -

Item 1 Article 17,

Decision16/2009/QĐ-UBND and

Item 1, Article 21, Decree

69/2009/NĐ-CP

1.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 1,000,000 - Item 2 Article 17, Decision

16/2009/QĐ-UBND and Item 2,


1.7 Assist to social VND/user 3 6,000,000 18,000,000 Proposal

99


2 Hung Nhan town

577,921,000















-


20 2,880,000 57,600,000


- 5,760,000 -


land Per head


5 5,760,000 28,800,000


- 11,520,000 -


employment VND/m

2 6,109 69,000 421,521,000





Item 1 Article 17,



69/2009/NĐ-CP

2.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 1,750,000 -

Item 2 Article 17, Decision




100


3 Tan Hoa

39,680,000
















1 2,880,000 2,880,000


5,760,000 -


land Per head

-


- 5,760,000 -


- 11,520,000 -


employment VND/m

2 - 69,000 -





Item 1 Article 17,



69/2009/NĐ-CP

3.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 750,000 -




3.7 Assist to social VND/user - 6,000,000 - Proposal

101


4 Lien Hiep

1,171,636,000
















43 2,880,000 123,840,000


- 5,760,000 -


land Per head


3 5,760,000 17,280,000


- 11,520,000 -


employment VND/m

2 11,764 69,000 811,716,000





Item 1 Article 17,



69/2009/NĐ-CP

4.6 Assist to agricultural land in residential area VND/m2 - 750,000 -





102


5 Phuc Khanh

489,492,000

5.1 Moving within a Province VND/HH - 5,000,000 -




5.2 Assistance for renting house VND/HH - 4,200,000 -











4 2,880,000 11,520,000


- 5,760,000 -


land Per head


1 5,760,000 5,760,000


- 11,520,000 -


employment VND/m

2 148 69,000 10,212,000




5.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 192 2,250,000 432,000,000

Item 1 Article 17,



69/2009/NĐ-CP






103


6 Thai Phuong

45,861,000
















1 2,880,000 2,880,000


- 5,760,000 -


land Per head


- 5,760,000 -


- 11,520,000 -


employment VND/m

2 449 69,000 30,981,000





Item 1 Article 17,



69/2009/NĐ-CP






104


7 Hung Ha town

21,200,000










-







- 2,880,000 -


- 5,760,000 -


land Per head

-


- 5,760,000 -


- 11,520,000 -


employment VND/m

2 - 69,000 -





Item 1 Article 17,



69/2009/NĐ-CP






105


8 Minh Khai

107,309,000
















3 2,880,000 8,640,000


- 5,760,000 -


land Per head


- 5,760,000 -


- 11,520,000 -


employment VND/m

2 601 69,000 41,469,000





Item 1 Article 17,



69/2009/NĐ-CP






106


9 Hong Linh

138,488,000
















- 2,880,000 -


- 5,760,000 -


land Per head


- 5,760,000 -


- 11,520,000 -


employment VND/m

2 152 69,000 10,488,000




9.5 Assist to fish pond, garden land VND/m2 61 2,000,000 122,000,000

Item 1 Article 17,



69/2009/NĐ-CP






Total

2,671,022,000

107

Table 35. 8: External monitoring cost

No. Item Unit Qty Unit cost

(VND) Cost (VND) Remark

I Remuneration for specialists

655,000,000

1 Team leader/Resettlement specialist man-

month 15 21,000,000 315,000,000 According to Decree 219 for Team leader

2 Community Development specialist man-

month 10 17,000,000 170,000,000

According to Decree 219 for specialist

having more than 10 experient years

3 Gender and ethnic minority specialist man-

month 10 17,000,000 170,000,000

According to Decree 219 for specialist

having more than 10 experient years

II Other costs

310,200,000

1 Perdiem

(6 months for each specialist) man-day 396 150,000 59,400,000 According to Decree 97

2 Travel cost (hiring car) km 9,000 13,000 117,000,000 Based on reality

3 Hotel cost night 396 300,000 118,800,000 According to Decree 97

4

Fees for organize the meetings with

compensation committees and interview

households

lump-sum

15,000,000

III Administrative cost

70,000,000

1 General activities (telephone, electricity,

water,...) month 15 4,000,000 60,000,000

2 Printing and punching document lump-sum 1 10,000,000 10,000,000 Based on reality

A Total of direct cost (I+II+III)

1,035,200,000

B VAT (10%)

103,520,000

C Contingency (10%)

113,872,000

Total A+B+C

1,252,592,000

108

Annex 1: The questionnaire for social and economic survey of affected assets

Vietnam Road Assets Management Program (VRAMP)

SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY AND AFFECTED ASSET FORM

Form VF05

Household code…………………. Survey date: ____ /__ /2013

Village………………Commune...........................District………….Province…………

A. HOUSEHOLDER INFORMATION

1. Full name of householder: ………………………………………; Age ……; Sex [ ]

Male=1; Female =2;

1.1 Ethnicity: [ ]; 1.2 Main occupation [ ]; 1.3 Secondary occupation [ ];

1.4 Education and occupation [ ];

1.6 Main monthly income of the householder: …………………………..……VND;

1.7 Classification of household : [ ] (1=Poor; 2= Near-poor; 3= Rise above poverty)

1.8 Policy family to enjoy social benefits: [ ]

(1=Single women householder; 2= Disabled persons; 3=The lonely aged; 4= Entitled to social

assistance; 5= Ethnic minorities)

1.9 The project affected area (a family may has land and property in different areas, if such, it needs

to mark clearly all affected areas of the household)

1) Within scope of road [ ]

2) Within safety corridor [ ]

3) Within viaduct, bridge [ ]

4) Within the scope of intersection [ ]

5) Other (please specify) [ ] _____________________

B. SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY IN AFFECTED AREA

2. Family members.

No. Full name

Sex Relation

with the

househo

lder 1=

Husband/Wif

e

2=

Father/Mothe

r

3=Son/daugh

ter

4= Son-in-

law/daughter-

in-law

5=Nephew/ni

ece

6=Other

brother/sister

Age

Ethnici

ty 1=Kinh

2= Thai

3= Tay 4= Nung

5= Muong

6=Hoa

7= Other

Main occupation 1= Agriculture (farming)

2= Livestock

3= Sales

4= Catering service,

5= Workers in factory,

workshop

6= State officials and state

employees

7= Work for private

companies

8= Work in transport field

9= Students, pupils

10= Housework

11= Hired worker

12=Other

Education 0= Illiterate

1= Primary school

2=Secondary school

3= High school

ungraduation

4= High school

5=Vocational

training

6= University and

above university

7= Others

Note

s

1=

Mal

e

2=

Fem

ale

1

109

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

3. Average annual income of household: ………………. ………… VND

Main sources of income contributed to the household's annual income:

1) Agricultural production (crops,

livestock)

Amount ________________________VND

2) Trade or business Amount ________________________VND

3) Salary Amount ________________________VND

4) From other sources (such as

remittances, etc.)

Amount ________________________VND

4. Average monthly expenditure of household

1) Average living expenditure of

household

Amount ________________________VND

2) Average healthcare of household Amount ________________________VND

3) Education spending Amount ________________________VND

4) Visit, tourism, relax Amount ________________________VND

5. The loan of household

Loans Loan amount

Loan-use purpose 1= Agricultural production

2= Business

3= Household expenditure

4= Building, repairing houses

5= Other (specify)

1) Loans from banks

2) Loans from other institutions

3) Loans from relatives, friends

4) Others

6. Please tell us the number of current assets and amenities your family is using?

Type of asset Number Type of asset Number Type of

asset Number Type of asset Number

1. Radio 4. bicycle 7.

Refrigerator 10. Gas Cooker

2. 5. Electric fans 8. Pump 11.Hot water

110

Tivi/Video tank

3. motorbike 6. Rice Cooker 9. Washing

machine 12. Computer

7. Water use: The daily main sources of water of household? (Marked x in the

appropriate box)

1) Digging well [ ] 2) Village public wells [ ]

3) Tap water [ ] 4) Rain water [ ]

5) Rivers, streams, ponds,

lakes

[ ] 6) Buying water [ ]

7) Ravine water [ ] 8) Other (specify) [ ]

8. Main energy for household lighting?

1) Power grid [ ] 4) Generator [ ]

2) Pin and battery [ ] 5) Oil lamp [ ]

3) Wood/charcoal [ ] 6) Others [ ]

9. Main energy for household cooking?

1) Power grid [ ] 5) Biogas [ ]

2) Generator [ ] 6) Others [ ]

3) Gas/oil [ ] 7) No answer [ ]

4) Wood/coal [ ]

10. Common diseases in the community (name of disease)

1) Cold [ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

6) Dysentery [ ]

2) Influenza 7) Hepatitis [ ]

3) Respiratory disease 8) Toxicinfection [ ]

4) Malaria 9) Others [ ]

5) Cholera 10) No answer [ ]

11. Household‟s access to healthcare, education and culture services?

Healthcare, education and culture

services 1=Yes 2=No

Less than

1km 1= 1 - 2 km 2= 2 - 5 km

3= More

than 5 km

Healthcare

1. Commune health station

2. District hospital

3. Clinic/nurse

4. Pharmacy

5. Traditional drug treatment

Education

6. Preschool

7. Elementary school

8. Secondary school

9. High school

10.Vocational school

111

Cultural, religion

11. Market

12. Stadiums, sports

13. Pagoda/temple/church

14. Other amusement and

entertainment parks

12. Has the household economic condition changed in the recent 3 years?

1) No change [ ]; Reason: _________________________________________________

2) Better [ ]; Reason: _________________________________________________

3) Worse [ ]; Reason: _________________________________________________

13. Do you support the road upgrading and expansion project?

1) Yes [ ] 2) No [ ]

If yes, what‟s the support reason?

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

If not, what do you wonder and worry about?

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

If the project is implemented, what is positive side do you find?

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

According to you, how is development of the road meaningful to the local socio-economic

development?

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

14. How is the division of labor in your family?

No. Work-item Men Women Both

1 Main farming activities

1.1 - Soil tuning

1.2 - Cultivation

1.3 - Sowing

1.4 - Weeding

1.5 - Pesticide spraying

1.6 - Harvest

112

2 Vegetable growing

3 Livestock

4 Small business

5 Workers

6 Labor migration (domestic)

15. Community activities

Activity Male Female Both

1. Attend community meetings

2. Participate in decision making

3. Join local organizations

4. Others

C. INVENTORY OF LOSS IN AFFECTED AREAS

16. Land use status of household (affected land is only located in areas that needs to

acquire for the project)

Map

Type of soil

Total

land

area

(m2)

Affected degree

of each parcel

of land

Current

land

use

Legal status

of land

Work-

item

Type of

affect

1= Urban

residential land

2= Rural residential

land

3= Paddy land

4= Garden

5= Aquaculture

land

6= Business/non-

agricultural land

7= Forest land

8=Other type of

land

Total

affected

area (m2)

1= Partly

affected

2 =

Totally

affected

1= Owned

land

2= Rented

land

1= With red book

2= No red book

but legalable for

red book

3= illegalable for

red book

4= Rented land

5= Safety corridor

1=

Pavement

2= Safety

corridor

3 = Bridge

4 =

Intersection

5= Other

(specify)

1=

Permanently

2=

Temporary

Type

Plot?

Total

113

17. Houses affected by the project

Type of

house

Total

building

floor (m2 )

Using status

Affected level Work item

Typ

e of

affec

t 1. Villa

2. Level 1

3. Level 2

4. Level 3

5. Level 4

6.

Temporary

house

1. With construction

license

2. Without

construction license

3. Built on agricultural

land

4. Rented house

5. Built on Safety

corridor

1. Living

2. Renting

3. Living and

renting

4. Living and

trading

5. Trading

Total affected

floor

(m2)

1= Partly

affected

2 = Totally

affected

1= Pavement

2= Safety corridor

3 = Bridge

4 = Intersection

5= Other (specify)

1=

Perman

ently

2=

Tempo

rary

Note: A household may have many affected houses; it is necessary fill in the information of all affected

house.

18. Business impact (in the project area)

1) Business impact [ ] (1=No; 2= Yes, if yes, asked additional questions below)

a. Business location [ ] (1= In the same house; 2= Independent outside house)

b. Business form [ ] (1=Company; 2=Store; 3=Household)

c. Business registration [ ] (1= Yes; 2=No)

d. Type of business:…………………………………………………………..

e. Monthly income from business: _________________VND (Just ask those who business is

affected)

f. Impact locations in the project area: [ ] (1= Pavement; 2= Safety corridors; 3= Bridge; 4= Intersection; 5=

Others)

19. Affected works and other structures and living facilities on land

(Statistics of affected independent works outside houses and living facilities are listed above)

Works/living facilities

Type of works

(corresponding to auxiliary

works)

Unit Quantity

Work items

1= Pavement

2= Safety corridor

3 = Bridge

4 = Intersection

5= Other (specify)

1. Independent kitchen

outside main

1. Temporary

2. Equivalent to house level 4 m

2

2. Pigsty/beef/chicken coops 1. Temporary

2. Equivalent to house level 4 m

2

114


Type of works


works)

Unit Quantity

Work items

1= Pavement

2= Safety corridor

3 = Bridge

4 = Intersection

5= Other (specify)

3. Power meter Unit

4. Water meter Unit

5. Estimated water pipe

length m

6. Wired telephone Unit

7. Fence 1. Brick

2. Wood or barbed m

2

8. Gate

1. Wall

2. Steel

3. Wood/Bamboo

m2

9. Toilet, bathroom

(separate from house)

1. Brick, concrete

2. Bamboo/leaf m

2

10. Earth tomb

a) At the cemetery

b) Separate

Unit

11. Built tomb (brick,

cement)

c) At the cemetery

d) Separate

Unit

12. Well 1. Drilled

2. Dug m

13. Water tank

1. Brick/concrete

2. Stainless steel/Inox

3. Plastics

m3

14. Yard (only cement or

tiled) m

2

15. Fish pond (excavated

quantity) m

3

16. Other works (name of

115


Type of works


works)

Unit Quantity

Work items

1= Pavement

2= Safety corridor

3 = Bridge

4 = Intersection

5= Other (specify)

works and affected area)

20. Types of affected trees, crops

(Only make statistical of affected perennial/fruit)

Type of plants or agricultural

products Specifications Unit Quantity

Work items

1= Pavement

2= Safety corridor

3 = Bridge

4 = Intersection

5= Other (specify)

a) Fruit trees (main plant) Tree

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

b) Timber (main plant) Tree

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

c) Decoration plant (main

plant)

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

d) Crops main (plant) m2

1) Rice

2) Corn

116

Type of plants or agricultural

products Specifications Unit Quantity

Work items

1= Pavement

2= Safety corridor

3 = Bridge

4 = Intersection

5= Other (specify)

3) Potatoes

4) Peanut

5) Beans

6)

e) The area of seafood

aquaculture

m

2

117

D. CONSULTATION QUESTIONS

21. If your agricultural land or other productive land is affected (due to land acquisition),

which compensation plan does your family select?

a) Receive land-for-land (if replacement land in the commune is available) with the same type and

area/profitability [ ]

b) Receive cash [ ]

c) Not decide [ ]

22. For those whose residential land is affected only:

If it is unable to rebuild house on the remaining residential land (the remaining area is less than 80m2

for urban land and 100m2 for rural land, which resettlement plan does your family select?

a) Move to another land of the family [ ]

b) Move to another place where the family choose [ ]

c) Move to the project resettlement site [ ]

d) Move to resettlement site arranged by local authorities [ ]

e) Not decide [ ]

23. How does your family plan to use the land compensation money?

1) Rebuild or repair houses [ ]

2) Buy a new land [ ]

3) Buy other asset [ ] ; Name of asset ________________

4) Invest in small business [ ]

5) Save in a bank [ ]

6) Spend for children’s education [ ]

7) Other intention [ ]; Description ____________________

24. Choose a livelihood rehabilitation form of household.

1) Agricultural activity [ ] 3) Self-find job [ ]

2) Apprenticeship [ ] 4) No answer [ ]

Thank you for answering our questions.

Surveyor Householder or family

representative

118

Annex 2: Project Information Booklet (PIB)

VIET NAM ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (VRAMP)

PROJECT INFORMATION BOOKLET (PIB)

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Viet Nam Road Asset Management Program (VRAMP) has subprojects in 3 provinces of Hung

Yen, Hai Duong and Thai Binh, in scope of 10 districts/cities, towns, 33 wards/communes. The

initial investment cost is estimated at $ 121.6 million, of which the World Bank loan of $ 71.6

million, the Government's counterpart funds of $ 50 million. Ministry of Transport is the Executive

Agency (EA) of the project.

The objectives of the project: Establish a financial basis, sustainable institutional arrangements in

order to manage and upgrade the road system, develop for the economy in the North and Central regions of

Viet Nam. The project will have two main outputs:

The project will finance for maintaining the national roads no. 2, no.5, no.6, no. 18 and no.48;

upgrading for the national roads no. 38, no.39, no 39-1 and four bridges with the length of about 25

m of the road no. 38 B

(i) Maintenance roads with diversified contract forms to establish a mechanism for managing of

the maintenance of the Vietnam road system effectively and stable.

(ii) Upgrade and renovate the important national roads in the north region, including the

national road No.38, No.39, No. 39-1 and 9 bridges with length more than 25 meters on the national

roads (2 bridges on national road No.38, 4 bridges on national road No. 38B, two bridges on

national road No.39 and 1 bridge on national road No.39-2). Improve the institutional arrangements

of the road management agencies in Vietnam.

QUESTION 1: How will the VRAMP affect the local population?

Answer:

Positive impacts: The population in the project areas will benefit variously, including more

extensive access to irrigation system and water supply for farming production, reducing risk of crop

failure due to lack of water and more available water for irrigation.

Adverse impacts: It needs to acquire some land for the construction of the main canal and other

components. Every attempt will be made during the design process to minimize adverse impacts of

such land acquisition on households and communities.

Where land acquisition is necessary, those affected HHs will be fully compensated for their

affected land, houses, structures, crops and/or trees and be provided assistances for the restoration of

their living standards. Details are included in a Resettlement Plan which will be available at your

commune office.

119

QUESTION 2: What is the main objective of resettlement plan?

Answer: The main objective of the Resettlement Plan is to improve or at least to restore the

pre-project living standards and earning capacities of all PAHs.

QUESTION 3: What will happen if my land is affected by the project?

Answer:

(i) You will be offered Land-for-land of similar attributes and with secure tenure OR cash

compensation at replacement cost which is equivalent to current market price.

(ii) No compensation for rent land, but full replacement cost for investment on land to land user.

QUESTION 4: Do we need legal papers of land for being entitled to the compensation?

Answer:No, lack of formal legal rights of land does not prevent any APs from receiving

compensation, allowances and rehabilitation assistance. Land owners with land use right certificates

(LURCs) or in the process of acquiring LURC will be fully compensated for affected land and other

assets on land. Land users who have neither formal legal rights nor recognized claims to such land

will be compensated for assets on land only.

QUESTION 5: Are affected houses and structures compensated?

Answer:Yes. All affected houses and other structures as well as other fixed assets such as well,

breeding facilities, fences, etc. are compensated at replacement cost without depreciation nor

deduction for salvageable materials for the affected portion. This will ensure that the APs are able to

reconstruct houses/structures with better quality or at least with equivalent quality of the pre-project

houses/structures.

QUESTION 6: What about affected crops and trees?

Answer:

i) Affected crops, trees on permanently acquired land will be compensated with market value of the

crops at the time of compensation.

(ii) Compensation for crops, trees on temporary affected land:

- Annual crops will be based on the average production in the past 3 years for the temporary

acquisition duration.

- Compensation for trees equivalent to current market value given the type, age and productive

value (future production) at the time of compensation.

QUESTION 7: Besides the compensation, are there any assistances provided by the project?

Answer:In addition to compensation for loss of land and other assets according to the project

entitlements, the Project will provide rehabilitation assistance to eligible APs to improve or at least

to restore the pre-project living standards of all PAHs. Types of assistance for eligible APs include:

120

Severely affected households: Households who lose more than 20% of their total productive

landholdings will receive a rehabilitation package consisting of (i) a transition subsistence

allowance equivalent (ii) income restoration assistance such as agricultural extension

assistance to intensify use of remaining land, access to existing credit programs or project-

related employment.

Relocated households: Households who must relocate to new places will receive (i) transport

assistance, (ii) a transition subsistence allowance, (iii) house rent assistance based on market

price. The assistance rates are given in details in project entitlements.

Business owners who lose income in the transition period: Households with small,

unregistered businesses will be provided cash assistance equal to the provincial minimum

salary for 3 months. Owners of registered businesses will be provided cash assistance

equivalent to 30% of after tax income in one year based on average income in the last 3

consecutive years as certified by the tax department of the province.

Employees and hired labors who lose their jobs will be provided cash compensation for

monthly salary/wages for lost period in case of temporarily affected; or cash compensation

equivalent to the provincial minimum wage for six months or cash compensation for

remaining contract period whichever is higher in case of permanently affected.

Assistance for career change: For registered or non-registered businesses on their affected

residential land, APs at labor age will be provided free training courses at local vocational training

centre which are suitable for local conditions and capacities of APs.

QUESTION 8: Are all of local people entitled to lodgement of complaints about compensation?

Answer: No. Entitled APs are those who will lose land or property based on the detailed

measurement survey (DMS) that will be conducted following completion of the final designs for the

project. Affected communes and local competent agencies will be informed of the cut-off date of the

project.

QUESTION 9: If there are any disagreements or problems about land acquisition,

compensation or other general disputes during project implementation, are APs entitled to lodgment

of their complaints?

Answer:Yes, APs are entitled to lodgment of their complaints as grievance redress procedures

of the project.

Every complaint, query of APs about land acquisition, compensation, resettlement and

implementation will be resolved according to project policies and in time. APs do not have to pay

any fees for the complaint resolution.

QUESTION 10: How will APs be consulted and disseminated information about the project?

121

Answer:Public consultation meetings are organized at the commune to ensure that APs are

provided fully information about the project. APs will be disseminated information about the project

components, impacts, their entitlements, grievance redress mechanism, rights of participation and

consultation about resettlement activities. APs will participate in the RP preparation and

implementation and will be consulted about following issues: (a) participation in the RP preparation

as their interests; (b) consultation about vocational training which is suitable for their capacities, (c)

participation in other activities of the project if they are qualified.

QUESTION 11: As a resident in the project area, how can I help?

Answer:We would like you to participate in all consultation meetings and other activities

involving to the project in order to ensure that you are fully informed and consulted. Your

participation during the detailed measurement survey (DMS) and the implementation will help us

determine measures to mitigate impacts, to detect outstanding issues and potential problems and

then to identify immediate resolution of these problems.

QUESTION 12: How will you know if the objectives of this project are met?

Answer: PMU3 will carry out internal monitoring on all project activities. In addition, PMU3

will engage an independent monitoring agency to conduct external monitoring on resettlement

activities during the project implementation. The independent monitoring agency will submit a

report to PMU3 and WB on resettlement implementation progress every 6 months. A post-

resettlement impact evaluation will be studied to assess whether adverse impacts have been

mitigated adequately and the pre-project living standards of APs have been restored or not.

For further information and suggestions, please contact the Province Compensation, Assistance

and Resettlement Management Board, District Compensation, Assistance and Resettlement Boards

or Commune People’s Committee where you are living.

122

Annex 3: List of participants and pictures of consultation meetings

Table 36: Meetings with Other Stakeholder

No. Commune

Number

of

affected

HH

Meeting

Date Venue

No. of

participants

With

participation

of

No. of households

with the

questionnaires

Male Female IOL SES %

1 Hung Ha 582 347 192 155 367 204

1.1 Tan Le 56 A:

28/01

CPC

meeting

hall

24 16 8 26 17 30%

1.2 Hung Nhan

town 121

M:

27/01

CPC

meeting

hall

45 22 23 48 36 30%

1.3 Lien Hiep 8 M:

30/01

CPC

meeting

hall

8 7 1 8 8 100%

1.4 Phuc Khanh 186 M:

29/01

CPC

meeting

hall

102 58 44 115 63 34%

1.5 Thai

Phuong 52

A:

27/01

Commune

Temple 45 24 21 45 17 33%

1.6 Hung Ha

town 12

M:

30/01

Commune

Temple 12 8 4 12 6 50%

1.7 Hong Linh 22 A:

29/01

CPC

meeting

hall

14 6 8 16 8 36%

1.8 Minh Khai 95 A:

30/01

CPC

meeting

hall

74 31 43 74 40 42%

1.9 Tan Hoa 30 A:30/01

CPC

meeting

hall

23 20 3 23 9 30%

2 Dong Hung 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

2.1 Minh Tan

Total 582 - - 347 192 155 367 204

123

Table 37: Consultation on income restoration measures

# Name Address Position Interviewed

date

1 Nguyen Van Hoa Provincial People’s

Council Chairman 27/02/2013

2 Bui Thi Nga Farmer Association Deputy Chairman 27/02/2013

3 Khuc Thi Duyen Provincial Women

Union Chairwoman 27/02/2013

4 Truong Thi Hong Hanh Provincial Women

Union Deputy Chairwoman 27/02/2013

5 Mai Cong Tuan Vocational Training

College 19-BQP

Deputy Head of

consulting Department 27/02/2013

6 Nguyen Thi Thuy Women Union of

Hung Ha District Official 28/02/2013

7 Vu Quang Huy Farmer Association of

Hung Ha Standing Member 28/02/2013

8 Pham Ba Thuat

Vocational Training

Center of Hung Ha

district

Official 28/02/2013

9 Luong Thi Tiep Enterprise no.10

(Stock Company) Head of Department 28/02/2013

124

Table 38: Meetings for a rapid survey in the replacement values

# Name Address Title Meeting date

I At the Provincial level

1 Mai Thi Toan Financial

Department

Head of Public Assets

and Price Department 27/02/2013

2 Nguyễn Văn Thi Construction

Department

Head of Economic

Department 27/02/2013

II Hung Ha District level

1 Bui Duy Hạnh DPC Vice Chairman 17/01/2013

2 Bui Xuan Phong DPC Head Office 17/01/2013

3 Pham Thanh Nhon

Department of

Natural Resources

and Environment

Head of Department 17/01/2013

4 Pham Vinh Quang

Department of

Natural Resources

and Environment

Official 17/01/2013

5 Hoang Dinh Chinh Department of

Industry and Trade Head Department 17/01/2013

6 Nguyen Van Vinh

Department of

Planning and

Finance

Head Department 20/1/2013

7 Vu Huu Ai

Department of

Planning and

Finance

Deputy Head


8 Nguyen Thi Nen

Department of

Planning and

Finance

Accountant 23/1/2013

9 Hoang Van Thu Agricultural

Department

Deputy Head of


10 Thanh Phuong

Shop of

Construction

Materials

Shop Owner 29/01/2013

11 Hanh Luc

Shop of

Construction

Materials

Shop Owner 29/01/2013

III At the Commune level

1 Tran Cong Ly Tan Le Commune Vice Chairman 28/01/2013

2 Tran Ba Hoi Tan Le Commune Land Manager 28/01/2013

125


3 Nguyen Van Cot Tan Le Commune Bui Xa Village Leader 28/01/2013

4 Hoang Thi Chai Tan Le Commune Chieu Thanh Village

Leader 28/01/2013

5 Tran Khac Lap Tan Le Commune Local Citizen 28/01/2013

6 Tran Ngoc Dai Tan Le Commune Local Citizen 28/01/2013

7 Tran Khac Dien Tan Le Commune Local Citizen 28/01/2013

8 Do Van Huyen Hung Nhan Town Deputy Chairman of

Commune 27/01/2013

9 Nguyen Chi Cong Hung Nhan Town Land Manager 27/01/2013

10 Nguyen Van Dinh Hung Nhan Town Dau Village Leader 27/01/2013

11 Thai Xuan Phong Hung Nhan Town Van Nam Village Leader 27/01/2013

12 Tran Thi Hue Hung Nhan Town Local Citizen 27/01/2013

13 To Duc Hung Hung Nhan Town Local Citizen 27/01/2013

14 Pham Van Dung Hung Nhan Town Local Citizen 27/01/2013

15 Nguyen Huu Tuyen Tan Hoa Commune Chairman of Commune 30/01/2013

16 Dao Quang Nghia Tan Hoa Commune Land Manager 30/01/2013

17 Nguyen Van Luan Tan Hoa Commune Luong Village Leader 30/01/2013

18 Truong Van Hieu Tan Hoa Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013

19 Le Minh Phong Tan Hoa Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013

20 Nguyen Thi Chung Tan Hoa Commune Local Citizen 30/01/2013

21 Dao Trong Giap Lien Hiep

Commune Chairman of Commune 29/01/2013

22 Tran Van Mung Lien Hiep

Commune Nai Village Leader 29/01/2013

23 Dao Van Voc Lien Hiep

Commune Nai Village Leader 29/01/2013

24 Dong Quang Binh Lien Hiep

Commune Bai Village Leader 29/01/2013

25 Nguyen Van Hoa Lien Hiep

Commune Local Citizen 29/01/2013

26 Nguyen Xuan Hung Lien Hiep


27 Nguyen Xuan Hai Lien Hiep


28 Bui Trong Don Phuc Khanh Chairman 27/01/2013

126


Commune

29 Nguyen Van Tho Phuc Khanh

Commune Land Manager 27/01/2013

30 Tran Dinh Tot Phuc Khanh

Commune

Khanh My Village

Leader 27/01/2013

31 To Tien Thung Phuc Khanh

Commune

Huong Xa Village

Leader 27/01/2013

32 Nguyen Van Cho Phuc Khanh


33 Tran Duy Ngan Phuc Khanh


34 Nguyen Van Chinh Phuc Khanh


35 Nguyen Van Chung Thai Phuong


36 Tran Van Sang Thai Phuong


37 Nguyen Duy Bich Thai Phuong

Commune Nhan Xa Village Leader 30/01/2013

38 Hoang Van Tuong Thai Phuong


39 Tran Van Dien Thai Phuong


40 Tran Huu Thuoc Thai Phuong


41 Nguyen Huu Huan Hung Ha Town Chairman of Commune 29/01/2013

42 Ngo Quoc Vu Hung Ha Town Land Manager 29/01/2013

43 Nguyen Manh Hung Hung Ha Town Nhan Cau 1 Village

Leader 29/01/2013

44 Nghiem Đinh Khoi Hung Ha Town Dong Tu 1 Village

Leader 29/01/2013

45 Nguyen Duy Hung Hung Ha Town Dong Tu 2 Village

Leader 29/01/2013

46 Nguyen Huu De Hung Ha Town Thi Doc Village Leader 29/01/2013

47 Nguyen Minh Duc Minh Khai


127


48 Hoang Ngoc Son Minh Khai


49 Nguyen Huu Man Minh Khai

Commune

Dong Lac Village

Leader 30/01/2013

50 Vu Trung Kien Minh Khai

Commune

Thanh Cach Village

Leader 30/01/2013

51 Tran Van Quan Minh Khai


52 Tran Van Hai Minh Khai


53 Tran Cong Thanh Minh Khai


54 Nguyen Duc Luy Hong Linh


55 Nguyen Ngoc An Hong Linh


56 Pham Van Thap Hong Linh

Commune Vu Dong Village Leader 30/01/2013

57 Nguyen Dinh Chieu Hong Linh

Commune

Dong Han Land

Manager 30/01/2013

58 Nguyen Viet Ba Hong Linh

Commune Village Leader 30/01/2013

59 Pham Van Bo Hong Linh


60 Nguyen Van Canh Hong Linh


128

Figure 5: Some photos about public consultation and participation

129

Annex 4: Detailed results survey on the substitution cost in each commune

Table 4.1: Comments from interviewees in Tan Le commune about the comparison between

unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement values

Properties

Same as

replacement

costs

Higher than

replacement

costs

Lower than

replacement

costs

% of PPC costs

lower than

replacement costs

Residential land x 60% - 80%

Agricultural land x 10% - 15%

Non-agricultural land x 50% - 75%

Houses and architectural works x 10% - 15%

Fruit and timber trees x 08% - 15%

Annual rice and crops x 10% - 15%

Table 4.2: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Tan Le commune, Hung Ha district

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

1 Land Decision No.3152/QD-UBND, dated 29/12/2012 by Thai

Binh Provincial People‟s Committee

1.1 Residential land

1.1.1 Place on the main surface of

roads. VND/m2 1,500,000 4,000,000 2.67

1.1.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 400,000 1,000,000 2.50

1.1.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 300,000 700,000 2.33

1.2 Commercial land, non-

agricultural business


roads. VND/m2 750,000 1,500,000 2.00

1.2.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 200,000 500,000 2.50


1.3 Agriculture land

1.3.1 Annual crop Land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10

1.3.2 Perennial Tree Land VND/m2 45,000 50,000 1.11

1.3.3 Aquaculture land VND/m2 42,000 46,000 1.10

130

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2 Houses, Substructures

Decision No.03/2013/QD-UBND dated 25/02/2013 by Thai

Binh Provincial People‟s Committee refer to Adjustment

the factor of compensation unit prices of construction

works issued Decision No.01/2010/QD-UBND dated

25/01/2010 by Thai Binh Provincial People's Committee

with K = 1.74

2.1 House with 1 floor, high walls

≥ 3m

2.1.1

House with wall made from

non-holes brick 110 with

columns, wooden structures,

roofing tile 22 pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10

2.1.2


non-holes brick 220, wooden

structures, roofing tile 22

pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10

2.1.3



columns, flat roof.

m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07

2.1.4

House made from non-holes

brick, flat roof, wall 220,

without reinforced foundation

and without easements.

m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11

2.1.5



foundation reinforced bamboo

poles, without easements.

m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08

2.2 House with 2 floors, flat roof

2.2.1


brick, load-bearing walls 220,



m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23

2.2.2




poles, without easements

m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23

131

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.3 House with 3 floors, flat roof,

easements inside house.

2.3.1




poles.

m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23

2.3.2


brick, load-bearing structural

frame, wall 220, foundation

reinforced bamboo poles.

m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22

2.3.3




reinforced concrete pile.

m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23

2.3.4





m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25

2.3.5





m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23



2.4.1





VND/m2

floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25

2.4.2





VND/m2

floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24

2.4.3





VND/m2

floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25

132

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.4.4





VND/m2

floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22

2.5 Additional house with high

walls < 3m -

2.5.1

House made from slag brick,

bamboo structure, fibro cement

tiled roof.

m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20

2.5.2


wooden structure, roofing tile

22 pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22

2.5.3


steel structure, metal sheet roof

covering.

m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22

3 Other works

3.1 Tank

3.1.1 Tank made from non-holes

brick, capacity ≤ 4m3 VND/m3 1,209,735 1,500,000 1.24

3.1.2

Tank made from non-holes

brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, with

concrete slab.

VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15

3.1.3


brick, capacity ≤ 10m3, without

concrete slab

VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25

3.2 Yard

3.2.1 Broken brick concrete yard,

smoothed with cement, sand. VND/m2 100,920 126,000 1.25

3.2.2 Oblong brick-paved yard VND/m2 168,780 210,000 1.24

3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23

3.3 Toilet outside house

3.3.1

Septic toilet (excluding doors

and toilet facilities that will be

detailed measurement multiply

by the unit price at the time of

survey)

VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24

3.3.2

No septic toilet (excluding

doors and toilet facilities that

will be detailed measurement

multiply by the unit price at the

time of survey)

VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24

3.4 Fence

133

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20

3.4.2 Barbed wire fence 20x20 m2 55,000 65,000 1.18

4 Trees, crops

Diameter

of leaf

canopy:

2-3 m

4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18

4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter

20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18

4.3 Grapefruit tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13

4.4 Orange tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17

4.5 Tangerine tree VND/tree 120,000 140,000 1.17

4.6 Kumquat tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10

4.7 Peach, Plum, Apricot (fruit tree) VND/tree 50,000 60,000 1.20

4.8 Mulberry tree VND/tree 180,000 210,000 1.17

4.9 Mango tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13

4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13

4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10

4.12 Peach tree VND/tree 15,000 18,000 1.20

4.13 “Xanh”, “Si” tree (leaf canopy) VND/tree 10,000 12,000 1.20

4.14 “Đa”, “Si”, “Sung” VND/tree 70,000 80,000 1.14 Diameter

of root:

8-15 cm 4.15 “Xanh”, “Loc vung” VND/tree 80,000 95,000 1.19

4.16 Young rice field VND/m2 2,500 3,000 1.20

4.17 Developing rice field VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25

4.18 Complete ploughed, raked field VND/m2 500 600 1.20

4.19 Galangal, ginger, lemongrass,

turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14

4.20 Sweet potato (by bed) VND/m2 1,700 2,000 1.18

4.21 Sweet potato (by cutting) VND/m2 500 600 1.20

4.22 Water morning glory, water-

taro, Indian taro VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25

4.23 Cabbage, kohlrabi VND/m2 3,000 4,000 1.33

4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20

4.25 Beans, peanut, corn, potato VND/m2 4,500 5,000 1.11

4.26 Water melon, cucumber, tomato VND/m2 3,800 4,000 1.05

4.27 Flowers crop VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20

4.28 “Gac”, Loopah, Pumpkin,

Gourd frame VND/m2 4,000 5,000 1.25

134

Table 4.3: Comments from interviewees in Hung Nhan town about the comparison between


Properties

Same as

replacement

costs

Higher than

replacement

costs

Lower than

replacement

costs

% of PPC costs

lower than

replacement costs







Table 4.4: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Hung Nhan town, Hung Ha district

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks





roads. VND/m2 5,000,000 7,000,000 1.40






roads. VND/m2 2,500,000 3,500,000 1.40







135

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks







with K = 1.74


≥ 3m

2.1.1





m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10

2.1.2




pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10

2.1.3



columns, flat roof.

m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07

2.1.4





m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11

2.1.5





m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08


2.2.1





m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23

2.2.2





m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23


easements inside house. -

2.3.1




poles.

m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23

136

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.3.2





m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22

2.3.3





m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23

2.3.4





m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25

2.3.5





m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23



2.4.1





VND/m2

floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25

2.4.2





VND/m2

floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24

2.4.3





VND/m2

floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25

2.4.4





VND/m2

floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22


walls < 3m -

2.5.1



tiled roof.

m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20

137

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.5.2



22 pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22

2.5.3



covering.

m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22

3 Other works

3.1 Tank



3.1.2



concrete slab.

VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15

3.1.3



concrete slab

VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25

3.2 Yard




3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23


3.3.1





survey)

VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24

3.3.2





time of survey)

VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24

3.4 Fence

3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20


4 Trees, crops

Diameter

of leaf 4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18

138

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter 20-

25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18

canopy:

2-3 m








4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13

4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10




of root:






turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14






4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20






139

Table 4.5: Comments from interviewees in Tan Hoa commune about the comparison between


Properties

Same as

replacement

costs

Higher than

replacement

costs

Lower than

replacement

costs

% of PPC costs

lower than

replacement costs







Table 4.6: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Tan Hoa commune, Hung Ha district

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks





roads. VND/m2 800,000 3,000,000 3.75






roads. VND/m2 400,000 1,000,000 2.50







140

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks







with K = 1.74


≥ 3m

2.1.1





m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10

2.1.2




pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10

2.1.3



columns, flat roof.

m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07

2.1.4





m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11

2.1.5





m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08


2.2.1





m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23

2.2.2





m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23



2.3.1




poles.

m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23

141

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks

2.3.2





m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22

2.3.3





m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23

2.3.4





m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25

2.3.5





m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23



2.4.1





VND/m2

floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25

2.4.2





VND/m2

floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24

2.4.3





VND/m2

floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25

2.4.4





VND/m2

floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22


walls < 3m -

2.5.1



tiled roof.

m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20

142

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks

2.5.2



22 pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22

2.5.3



covering.

m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22

3 Other works

3.1 Tank



3.1.2



concrete slab.

VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15

3.1.3



concrete slab

VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25

3.2 Yard




3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23


3.3.1





survey)

VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24

3.3.2





time of survey)

VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24

3.4 Fence

3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20


4 Trees, crops

Diameter

143

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks

4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18 of leaf

canopy:

2-3 m 4.2 Longan, litchi tree (diameter

20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18








4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13

4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10




of root:






turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14






4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20






144

Table 4.7: Comments from interviewees in Lien Hiep commune about the comparison between


Properties

Same as

replacement

costs

Higher than

replacement

costs

Lower than

replacement

costs

% of PPC costs

lower than

replacement costs







Table 4.8: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Lien Hiep commune, Hung Ha district

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks





roads. VND/m2 700,000 3,000,000 4.29


1.1.3 Remaining locations VND/m2 300,000 1,000,000 3.33




roads. VND/m2 350,000 1,000,000 2.86







145

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks







with K = 1.74


≥ 3m

2.1.1





m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10

2.1.2




pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10

2.1.3



columns, flat roof.

m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07

2.1.4





m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11

2.1.5





m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08


2.2.1





m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23

146

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks

2.2.2





m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23



2.3.1




poles.

m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23

2.3.2





m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22

2.3.3





m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23

2.3.4





m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25

2.3.5





m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23



2.4.1





VND/m2

floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25

147

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks

2.4.2





VND/m2

floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24

2.4.3





VND/m2

floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25

2.4.4





VND/m2

floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22


walls < 3m -

2.5.1



tiled roof.

m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20

2.5.2



22 pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22

2.5.3



covering.

m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22

3 Other works

3.1 Tank



3.1.2



concrete slab.

VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15

3.1.3



concrete slab

VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25

148

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks

3.2 Yard




3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23


3.3.1





survey)

VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24

3.3.2





time of survey)

VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24

3.4 Fence

3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20


4 Trees, crops

Diameter

of leaf

canopy:

2-3 m

4.1 Litchi tree VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18


20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18







149

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks


4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13

4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10




of root:






turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14






4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20






150

Table 4.9: Comments from interviewees in Phuc Khanh commune about the comparison

between unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement values

Properties

Same as

replacement

costs

Higher than

replacement

costs

Lower than

replacement

costs

% of PPC costs

lower than

replacement costs







Table 4.10: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Phuc Khanh commune, Hung Ha district

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks





roads. VND/m2 2,500,000 4,500,000 1.80






roads. VND/m2 1,250,000 2,000,000 1.60







151

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks







with K = 1.74


≥ 3m

2.1.1





m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10

2.1.2




pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10

2.1.3



columns, flat roof.

m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07

2.1.4





m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11

2.1.5





m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08


2.2.1





m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23

2.2.2





m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23



2.3.1




poles.

m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23

152

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.3.2





m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22

2.3.3





m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23

2.3.4





m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25

2.3.5





m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23



2.4.1





VND/m2

floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25

2.4.2





VND/m2

floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24

2.4.3





VND/m2

floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25

2.4.4





VND/m2

floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22


walls < 3m -

2.5.1



tiled roof.

m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20

153

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.5.2



22 pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22

2.5.3



covering.

m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22

3 Other works

3.1 Tank



3.1.2



concrete slab.

VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15

3.1.3



concrete slab

VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25

3.2 Yard




3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23


3.3.1





survey)

VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24

3.3.2





time of survey)

VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24

3.4 Fence

3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20


4 Trees, crops Diameter


154

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks


20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18

canopy:

2-3 m








4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13

4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10




of root:






turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14






4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20






155

Table 4.11: Comments from interviewees in Thai Phuong commune about the comparison


Properties

Same as

replacement

costs

Higher than

replacement

costs

Lower than

replacement

costs

% of PPC costs

lower than

replacement costs







Table 4.12: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Thai Phuong commune, Hung Ha

district

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks





roads. VND/m2 2,000,000 4,000,000 2.00






roads. VND/m2 1,000,000 5,000,000 5.00







156

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks







with K = 1.74


≥ 3m

2.1.1





m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10

2.1.2




pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10

2.1.3



columns, flat roof.

m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07

2.1.4





m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11

2.1.5





m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08


2.2.1





m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23

2.2.2





m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23



2.3.1




poles.

m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23

157

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.3.2





m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22

2.3.3





m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23

2.3.4





m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25

2.3.5





m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23



2.4.1





VND/m2

floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25

2.4.2





VND/m2

floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24

2.4.3





VND/m2

floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25

2.4.4





VND/m2

floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22


walls < 3m -

2.5.1



tiled roof.

m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20

158

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.5.2



22 pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22

2.5.3



covering.

m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22

3 Other works

3.1 Tank



3.1.2



concrete slab.

VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15

3.1.3



concrete slab

VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25

3.2 Yard




3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23


3.3.1





survey)

VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24

3.3.2





time of survey)

VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24

3.4 Fence

3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20


4 Trees, crops

Diameter


159

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks


20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18

canopy:

2-3 m








4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13

4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10




of root:






turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14






4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20






160

Table 4.13: Comments from interviewees in Hung Ha town about the comparison between


Properties

Same as

replacement

costs

Higher than

replacement

costs

Lower than

replacement

costs

% of PPC costs

lower than

replacement costs







Table 4.14: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Hung Ha town, Hung Ha district

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks





roads. VND/m2 8,000,000 11,000,000 1.38

1.1.2 Place on the alley VND/m2 1,000,000 1,500,000 1.50





roads. VND/m2 4,000,000 5,500,000 1.38







161

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks







with K = 1.74


≥ 3m

2.1.1





m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10

2.1.2




pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10

2.1.3



columns, flat roof.

m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07

2.1.4





m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11

2.1.5





m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08


2.2.1





m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23

2.2.2





m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23



2.3.1




poles.

m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23

162

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.3.2





m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22

2.3.3





m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23

2.3.4





m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25

2.3.5





m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23



2.4.1





VND/m2

floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25

2.4.2





VND/m2

floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24

2.4.3





VND/m2

floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25

2.4.4





VND/m2

floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22


walls < 3m -

2.5.1



tiled roof.

m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20

163

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.5.2



22 pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22

2.5.3



covering.

m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22

3 Other works

3.1 Tank



3.1.2



concrete slab.

VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15

3.1.3



concrete slab

VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25

3.2 Yard




3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23


3.3.1





survey)

VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24

3.3.2





time of survey)

VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24

3.4 Fence

3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20




164

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks


20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18

canopy:

2-3 m








4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13

4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10




of root:






turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14






4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20






165

Table 4.15: Comments from interviewees in Minh Khai commune about the comparison

between unit costs enacted by Thai Binh PPC and the replacement value

Properties

Same as

replacement

costs

Higher than

replacement

costs

Lower than

replacement

costs

% of PPC costs

lower than

replacement costs







Table 4.16: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Minh Khai commune, Hung Ha

district

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks





roads. VND/m2 3,000,000 7,000,000 2.33






roads. VND/m2 1,500,000 3,000,000 2.00







166

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks







with K = 1.74


≥ 3m

2.1.1





m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10

2.1.2




pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10

2.1.3



columns, flat roof.

m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07

2.1.4





m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11

2.1.5





m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08


2.2.1





m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23

2.2.2





m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23



2.3.1




poles.

m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23

167

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks

2.3.2





m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22

2.3.3





m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23

2.3.4





m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25

2.3.5





m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23



2.4.1





VND/m2

floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25

2.4.2





VND/m2

floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24

2.4.3





VND/m2

floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25

2.4.4





VND/m2

floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22


walls < 3m -

2.5.1



tiled roof.

m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20

168

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks

2.5.2



22 pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22

2.5.3



covering.

m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22

3 Other works

3.1 Tank



3.1.2



concrete slab.

VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15

3.1.3



concrete slab

VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25

3.2 Yard




3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23


3.3.1





survey)

VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24

3.3.2





time of survey)

VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24

3.4 Fence

3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20




169

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(%)

Remarks


20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18

canopy:

2-3 m








4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13

4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10




of root:






turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14






4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20






170

Table 4.17: Comments from interviewees in Hong Linh commune about the comparison


Properties

Same as

replacement

costs

Higher than

replacement

costs

Lower than

replacement

costs

% of PPC costs

lower than

replacement costs







Table 4.18: The results of replacement costs surveyed in Hong Linh commune, Hung Ha

district

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks





roads. VND/m2 1,000,000 4,000,000 4.00






roads. VND/m2 500,000 800,000 1.60







171

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks







with K = 1.74


≥ 3m

2.1.1





m2 floor 2,280,842 2,500,000 1.10

2.1.2




pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,450,334 2,700,000 1.10

2.1.3



columns, flat roof.

m2 floor 1,594,506 1,700,000 1.07

2.1.4





m2 floor 1,891,770 2,100,000 1.11

2.1.5





m2 floor 2,126,446 2,300,000 1.08


2.2.1





m2 floor 2,937,959 3,600,000 1.23

2.2.2





m2 floor 2,853,160 3,500,000 1.23



2.3.1




poles.

m2 floor 3,240,243 4,000,000 1.23

172

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.3.2





m2 floor 3,278,567 4,000,000 1.22

2.3.3





m2 floor 3,401,368 4,200,000 1.23

2.3.4





m2 floor 3,128,660 3,900,000 1.25

2.3.5





m2 floor 3,251,462 4,000,000 1.23



2.4.1





VND/m2

floor 3,372,996 4,200,000 1.25

2.4.2





VND/m2

floor 3,458,191 4,300,000 1.24

2.4.3





VND/m2

floor 3,119,476 3,900,000 1.25

2.4.4





VND/m2

floor 3,193,759 3,900,000 1.22


walls < 3m -

2.5.1



tiled roof.

m2 floor 1,003,318 1,200,000 1.20

173

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks

2.5.2



22 pieces/m2.

m2 floor 2,048,017 2,500,000 1.22

2.5.3



covering.

m2 floor 1,471,836 1,800,000 1.22

3 Other works

3.1 Tank



3.1.2



concrete slab.

VND/m3 1,039,650 1,200,000 1.15

3.1.3



concrete slab

VND/m3 637,710 800,000 1.25

3.2 Yard




3.2.3 Tile yard VND/m2 170,520 210,000 1.23


3.3.1





survey)

VND/m2 6,946,451 8,600,000 1.24

3.3.2





time of survey)

VND/m2 6,778,057 8,400,000 1.24

3.4 Fence

3.4.1 Lattice fence B40 m2 25,000 30,000 1.20




174

No. Item Unit

Unit

issued by

Province

(VND)

Replacement

cost (VND)

Different

factor

(time)

Remarks


20-25cm) VND/tree 200,000 235,000 1.18

canopy:

2-3 m








4.10 “Na” tree VND/tree 150,000 170,000 1.13

4.11 Egg tree VND/tree 100,000 110,000 1.10




of root:






turmeric VND/m2 7,000 8,000 1.14






4.24 Herbs VND/m2 5,000 6,000 1.20






rp1459 v4 - world bank documents and reports

Documents