federal republic of nigeria rural access and mobility project
TRANSCRIPT
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA
RURAL ACCESS AND MOBILITY PROJECT
(RAMP II ADAMAWA STATE)
ABBREVIATED RESSETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (ARAP)
FOR THE PROPOSED RURAL ROADS IN ADAMAWA STATE
REVISED: JUNE 2019
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
ARAP June 2019
ii
Table of Contents
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................. v
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... vii
CHAPTER ONE: PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION .......................................................... 1
1.1. Project components ................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Component entailing land acquisition ...................................................................... 1
1.3 Design Consideration to avoid and minimize land acquisition ................................... 2
CHAPTER TWO: CENSUS AND VALUATION OF ASSETS ............................................................. 3
2.1 Census ..................................................................................................................... 3
2.1.1 Description of the Project area ................................................................................. 3
2.1.2 Characteristics of PAPs Households .......................................................................... 3
2.1.3 Marital Status .......................................................................................................... 4
2.1.4 Means of Livelihoods ............................................................................................... 4
2.1.5 Income .................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Valuation of assets .................................................................................................. 5
2.2.1 Valuation Method for Land ...................................................................................... 6
2.2.2 Replacement Cost Method for Assets/Structures ...................................................... 6
2.2.3 Crops/Trees ............................................................................................................. 7
2.2.4 Shrines or Place of Worship ...................................................................................... 7
2.2.4 Compensation for public/community facilities .......................................................... 7
CHAPTER THREE: COMPENSATION AND OTHER RESETTLEMENT ASSISTANCES ........................ 9
3.1 Loss of Land: ............................................................................................................ 9
3.2 Loss of Buildings or Structure ................................................................................. 10
3.3 Loss of business ..................................................................................................... 11
3.4 Loss of Economic Trees ........................................................................................... 11
3.5 Impact on Utilities.................................................................................................. 12
3.6 Loss of access to common (community) property .................................................... 12
3.7 Impact on Vulnerable Group .................................................................................. 13
CHAPTER FOUR: CONSULTATIONS ........................................................................................ 14
ARAP June 2019
iii
4.1 Consultation method ............................................................................................. 14
4.2 Choices and Rights ................................................................................................. 14
4.3 Concerns and Resolutions ............................................................................................... 14
CHAPTER FIVE: INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION .............................. 17
5.1 World Bank (WB) and French Development Agency (AFD) .............................................. 17
5.2 Federal Project Management Unit (FPMU) ............................................................. 17
5.3 Federal Ministry of Environment ................................................................................... 18
5.4 Adamawa State Ministry of Environment ............................................................... 18
5.5 State Ministry of Land and Survey .......................................................................... 18
5.6 State Project Implementation Unit (SPIU) .................................................................... 18
5.7 Social Safeguards Officer for the SPIU (SSO-SPIU) ................................................... 19
5.8 Adamawa State Community and Social Development Agency ................................ 19
5.9 Others ................................................................................................................... 19
5.9.1 Community and Village Heads, Opinion Leaders ..................................................... 19
5.9.2 Community Grievance Redress Committee (CGRC) .................................................. 20
CHAPTER SIX: MONITORING AND evaluation ....................................................................... 21
6.1 Impact Monitoring and Evaluation ......................................................................... 21
CHAPTER SEVEN: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AND BUDGET ............................................. 23
7.1 Implementation Schedule .............................................................................................. 23
7.2 Capacity Building ................................................................................................... 23
7.3 Budget ................................................................................................................... 24
CHAPTER EIGHT: GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ............................................................ 26
8.1 Grievances and appeals procedure ......................................................................... 26
8.1.1 Grievance Redress Process ..................................................................................... 27
8.1.2 Structure of Grievance Redress for the Road Rehabilitation Works ......................... 27
8.1.3 Expectation When Grievances Arise ....................................................................... 27
8.1.4 Management of Reported Grievances .................................................................... 28
8.1.5 Monitoring Complaints .......................................................................................... 28
8.1.6 Grievance Redress Institutions ............................................................................... 28
ARAP June 2019
iv
8.2 The World Bank Grievance Redress Service (GRS) ................................................... 31
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ............................................................................... 32
References........................................................................................................................... 33
ANNEX 1: DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROPOSED 361.7KM PHASE II RURAL ROADS UNDER RAMP –
2 IN ADAMAWA STATE ........................................................................................................ 34
Annex 2: People met during the study .................................................................................. 35
Annex 3: Minutes of meetings ............................................................................................. 36
Annex 4: PAPs Meeting Attendance ..................................................................................... 42
ANNEX 5: LIST OF PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS (PAPs) ALONG THE ROADS CORRIDORS ....... 46
ARAP June 2019
v
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ARAP Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan
ASCSDA Adamawa State Community and Social Development Agency
ADSG Adamawa State Government
AU African Union
BP Bank Policy
CBO Community Based Organization
EA Environmental Assessment
ECOWAS Economic Communities of West States
EIA Environmental impact assessment
ESIA Environmental and social impact assessment
ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework
ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan
FGD Focus Group Discussion
FGN Federal Government of Nigeria
FMA&RD Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
FMEnv Federal Ministry of Environment
FPMU Federal Project Management Unit
GDP Gross Domestic Product
HIV/AIDS Human Immuno Deficiency Virus
HSE Health, Safety and Environment
LA Land Act
LRCC Locational Resettlement and Compensation Committee
LG Local Government
LGA Local Government Area
MOF Ministry of Finance
M&E Monitoring and Evaluation
NLC National Land Commission
NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations
OHS Occupational Health and Safety
O&M Operation and Maintenance
OP Operational Policy
PAP Project Affected Persons
P&E Plant and Equipment
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
MU Monitoring Unit
ARAP June 2019
vi
RAMP Rural Access Mobility Project
ROW Right of Way
RPF Resettlement and Policy Framework
SWM Solid Waste Management
SPIU State Project Implementation Unit
PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal
RAP Resettlement Action Plan
RPF Resettlement Policy Framework
SMP Social Management Plan
STDs Sexually Transmitted Diseases
TOR Terms of Reference
VRCC Village Resettlement and Compensation Committee
WB World Bank
WHO World Health Organization
ARAP June 2019
vii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Rural Access Mobility Project under phase 2 involves the rehabilitation and maintenance of 29 existing rural roads with total distances of 300km in Adamawa state. The Project has three (3) primary components. Of the three components, civil work activities under component 1 are expected to require temporary and permanent land acquisition to advance the project’s objective. Land acquisition for the project activities is expected to be minor and negligible. Permanent and temporary structures, utility facilities, farmlands and trees along the road alignment will be affected and will be fully compensated at full replacement cost.
A census was carried out to identify potential Project Affected Persons (PAPs). The census outcome shows that 65 PAPs will be potentially impacted/suffer economic losses as a result of component 1 activities. It is noted that poverty, illiteracy and unemployment are key characteristics of the project area. The census also suggested that about 79% of the PAPs in the project communities are Farmers, about 10% are engaged in Civil Service/Public work, while the remaining 11% are engaged in different forms of Businesses and trade activities.
The inventory of assets taken in impact corridors showed that land will be acquired, structures will be affected, and economic crops/trees will be removed. These properties are found within the 12m Right of Way (ROW) along the road corridors with 8m carriage way and 2m road setback on each side of the road.
Following the census exercise, an inventory of assets to be impacted by component 1 activities was carried out and assets valuation exercises were conducted. The objective of the asset valuation exercise was to determine the value of the asset to be impacts and assigned a compensation amount that yield sufficient to replace the affected assets, plus necessary transaction costs associated with asset replacement.
Persons who will be affected directly by the sub-project or sub-project associated activities are eligible to receive full replacement cost and rehabilitation assistance for impacts identified as part of the screening and census. The following categories of PAPs are qualified for compensation: a) PAPs who have formal legal rights to land or assets; b) PAPs who do not have formal legal rights to land or assets, but have a claim to land or assets that is recognized or recognizable under national law - such claims could be derived from adverse possession or from customary or traditional tenure arrangements; or c) PAPs who have no recognizable legal right or claim to the land or assets they occupy or use (for example squatters or petty traders, including persons using or occupying existing right of way.
Consultation is an important tool required in the preparation of an ARAP. In line with OP 4.12 stipulation, potential PAPs have been informed that there will be foreseeable involuntary resettlement concerns, especially on the people and their structures during the civil works. PAPs were adequately informed of their rights, and resettlement options available to them, e.g., in the area of land-to-land or land-to-money compensations for assets and structures. They were also informed of their “Power of choice” which establishes their options to agree or disagree with the land acquisition and economic displacements, without adverse consequences imposed formally or informally on them.
The likelihood of dispute is much reduced because the affected persons are few, and they have been duly consulted about the road rehabilitation project. Nevertheless, in the event that grievances arise a grievance redress mechanism (GRM) has been prepared to effectively address all project related concerns. Already, the affected persons have been helped to appreciate that there are provisions for addressing any complaints or grievances. The grievance procedure will further be made available to the affected person through project implementation.
ARAP June 2019
viii
This ARAP recognizes the cross-ministerial coordination and collaboration of the many Federal and State Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) as well as local governments and communities involved in RAMP 2. This brought about the identification and coordination of institutional resources and capabilities amongst public agencies with local communities and PAPs with a view to ensuring good project management and implementation of this ARAP. The institutional arrangement presents the relevant institutions and the responsibilities they are expected to discharge for effective implementation of the ARAP.
A total of NGN) 19,286,300 (US$52,839) is allocated in this ARAP budget to meet the cost of ccompensation and resettlement assistances, implementation support, consultations, sensitization and, training, The total ARAP budget shall be provided by the Adamawa State Government. The total amount shall be deposited into the special account two weeks prior to commencement of payments to PAPs. This account shall be opened and maintained by SPIU. It is important that before civil work will commence in the project area, all PAPs need to be adequately compensated.
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of the ARAP will be carried out throughout the project implementation process. Specifically, the implementation of ARAP starts from identification, valuation and validation to compensation and beyond (livelihood restoration). This is to ensure that the objectives are met and successful implementation of the ARAP occurs.
ARAP June 2019
1
CHAPTER ONE: PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) through the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (FMARD) has put in place a comprehensive Rural Travel and Transport Program (RTTP) for the implementation of the National Rural Travel and Transport Policy (NRTTP). This initiative is being supported and implemented using the Rural Access and Mobility Projects (RAMP), through long term performance-based contracts which include rehabilitation, improvement and maintenance of existing rural roads and river crossings. The RAMP is intended to improve transport conditions in rural areas and to bring about sustained access to the rural population. The project is a World Bank assisted project, co-financed by the French Development Agency with counterpart funds from the benefitting States. The phase 2 of RAMP (RAMP-2) in Adamawa State is aimed at improving and enhancing accessibility and mobility in the rural areas. Accessibility and mobility are critical issues in the lives of the rural population, considering that majority of them are Agriculturalists. Movement of their agricultural inputs and outputs (produce) is hinged on accessibility and mobility. Presently, most rural areas in the RAMP-2 participating States suffer as a result of absence of roads, culverts and bridges and or poor conditions of same.
1.1. Project components
The RAMP-2 has three (3) primary components:
Component 1: Rehabilitation of Rural and State Roads - which would finance rehabilitation works for 300km of rural roads numbering 29 roads in Adamawa State as well as the related design studies and external supervision activities.
Components 2: Roads Maintenance and Local Development which would finance road maintenance activities on rehabilitated roads and support state mechanisms for maintenance funding. The models to be used in the maintenance mechanism involve community-based approach among others.
Components 3: Capacity Building and Project Administration, which would finance Institutional Strengthening activities at state level as well as project administration costs. Details of the project components are found in the Project Appraisal Document (PAD), Project Implementation Manual (PIM) and Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF).
1.2 Component entailing land acquisition
The sub-project activities under components 1 include the rehabilitation and maintenance of 29 number
(300km) existing rural roads in Adamawa and will impact some permanent structures, temporary structures, utility facilities, farmlands and trees, which have to be removed, and compensations paid to affected persons. The activities which include road construction, rehabilitation and supervision will be carried out under component 1, and are expected to require temporary and permanent land acquisitions.
ARAP June 2019
2
1.3 Design Consideration to avoid and minimize land acquisition
The following are technical steps taken by the Adamawa state RAMP II which have resulted in the reduction of adverse impacts of the sub-project:
• the engineering design for the road intervention to follow the existing alignments of the roads as much as possible to avoid structures and land take unless it became necessary to divert from the existing alignment;
• the setback for access and buffer on the corridors was made known to the stakeholders to be 12 meters however, the project will utilize 8 meters from the center of the road in built-up area. Where the 8 meters required is not available; the project will operate with existing space; and
• Consulting/communicating with the project communities and the PAPs information on the day and time to expect commencement of construction work activities within their respective locations. This will give the PAPs opportunity to harvest mature crops or remove any valuables before the beginning of civil works.
In spite of the outlined impact reduction measures above, mitigation measures have also been clearly prepared in this document, which is in line with the World Bank policy (OP 4.12) on involuntary resettlement to ensure that those who must suffer economic impacts are restored to the pre-project state or better.
Land acquisition will occur as a result of diversions from existing road alignments into nearby farmland/bush and expansion of existing carriageway. Land will also be required to set up construction camp and workshops. These land requirements will be minimal. In addition, entry points have been provided in the design to allow access to work areas. This has been discussed with the community and owners who provided suitable locations for these uses.
Although there are some assets within these setbacks which are mostly farm crops and economic trees, as well as parts of structures such as fences and buildings, the proposed roads rehabilitation will be managed to avoid or at least reduce interference with any of the structures such as concrete fences or buildings.
ARAP June 2019
3
CHAPTER TWO: CENSUS AND VALUATION OF ASSETS
2.1 Census
The objectives of the census are to identify:
• the current occupants of the affected area in order to establish a basis for the design of the resettlement program and to exclude subsequent inflows of people from eligibility for compensation and resettlement assistance;
• baseline information of the displaced households, including information on livelihood and standard of living of the displaced population;
• the magnitude of the expected loss of assets (total or partial), and the extent of displacements (physical or economic);
• information on vulnerable groups whom special provisions may have to be made; and
• provision to update information on the displaced people’s livelihoods and standards of living at regular intervals so that the latest information is available at the times of their displacement.
The census will determine the number of Project Affected Persons (PAPs), their assets, and potential impacts of component 1 activities on them.
A census was conducted on the project areas between November 18 - December 4 2018. The cut-off date for the exercise was scheduled on 4th December 2018. The census outcome showed that 65 PAPs will be potentially impacted/suffer socio-economic losses as a result of civil works associated with component 1 activities. However, some PAPs are considered as encroachers due to the illegal construction of structures on the Right-of-way (ROW) without permission from the constituted authorities such as the town planners or land department. Such category of people will not be eligible for land compensation. However, they will be eligible for compensation on the structure to be demolished or shifted. The outcome of the census is used for determining eligibility criteria for compensation, resettlement and other social risks and impacts measures.
2.1.1 Description of the Project area
The project area is mainly rural with 3 roads close to city, 3 roads towns and 23 roads in small towns or villages. Poverty, illiteracy and unemployment are key characteristics of the project area, especially in the rural sections. Poverty incidence in the project area was computed using household’s per capita daily expenditure. The results showed that majority of the PAPs (66%) are poor, while 34% of them are above the established poverty line (using the equivalent of $1.25 USD per day). To bring the people out of poverty, development projects such as roads construction becomes imperative. 2.1.2 Characteristics of PAPs Households
A total of 65 PAPs were surveyed. The respondents’ ages ranged from 15 to above 61 years. The result of the census ID depicted in table 2.1 below:
ARAP June 2019
4
Table 2.1: Project Affected Persons (PAPs) – By age and gender
Age range Number of Male Number of Female Total
15 – 25 5 0 5
26 – 35 16 1 17
36 – 45 16 2 18
46 -55 19 0 19
56 -65 3 0 3
66 –above 0 0 3
Total 62 3 65
Note: Census was conducted in the impact corridor. As shown in the table above:
• Age 15 - 25years constituted 8% of the total PAPs,
• age 26 -35 years represented of 26% of the total PAPs
• Age 36-45 years constituted 28% of the total PAPs,
• Age 46- 55 years represented 29% of the total PAPs
• 56-65 constituted 4.5% of the total PAPs; and
• Age above 66 is 4.5 % of the total PAPs.
The results of the census showed that those groups within the age range of 26 - 55 years constituted 83% of the PAPs. It is also important to note that of the total 65 PAPs, 62 PAPs are male while 3 are female. 2.1.3 Marital Status
Of the total PAPs, the census indicated that 60 of the PAPs are married and while 5 are single. Out of the 5 single families shown in the table 2.2 below, 4 PAPs are within the age range of 26-45 while 1 is above 66 years. While implementing this ARAP a special attention shall be given to these groups of PAPs.
Table 2.2: Project Affected Persons (PAPs) – Marital Status
Note: Census was conducted in the impact corridor
2.1.4 Means of Livelihoods
As evidenced by the census, the main livelihood activity in the project areas is agriculture. Majority of the PAPs are subsistence farmers who are mainly engaged in growing rice, vegetable, plantains, ground-nuts, palm nuts, cash crops as well hunting activities as shown in the table 2.3 below.
Age range Married Single Total
15 – 25 5 0 5
26 – 35 14 3 17
36 – 45 17 1 18
46 -55 19 0 19
56 -65 3 0 3
66 – above 2 1 3
Total 60 5 65
ARAP June 2019
5
Table 2.3: Project Affected Persons (PAPs) – By means of Livelihoods and gender
Means of Livelihoods No. Male No. Female Total
Agriculture 21 2 23
Civil servant 20 0 20
Business (petty-trader) 11 1 12
Self employed 8 0 8
Unemployed 1 0 1
Other 1 0 1
Total 62 3 65
Note: Census was conducted in the impact corridor. Of the total of 65 PAPs depicted in the above table:
o 35% of the PAPs are Farmers whose livelihoods is dependent on agricultural activities, o 31% are engaged in Civil Service/Public work, o 18% are engaged in different forms of Businesses and trade activities, o 13% are self-employed, o 1.5% is unemployed; and o 1.5% is engaged in other activities that are not listed in the table.
2.1.5 Income
The census was also used to identify potential PAPs in three income categories. As shown in table 2.4 below, out of the 65 PAPs, 22 PAPs earn a monthly income of less that NGN 20,000 while 48 of them earn a monthly income of more than NGN 21, 000. Income level of these groups of PAPs suggested that care should be exercised while handling compensation and resettlement assistances, and as well as while implementing this ARAP.
Table 2.4: Monthly Income
Income range No of PAPs %
Less than NGN 20,000 18 28
NGN 20,001 – NGN 100,000 40 61
More than NGN 100,001 7 11
Total 65 100
Note: Census was conducted in the impact corridor. The average monthly income is estimated to be NGN 114,088. Considering the household size, (42.6% households have a range of 11-25 persons/household), the monthly income is insufficient for the people to lead a decent life. It is also estimated that the average annual income for farm work is NGN 427,161 while for non-farm work is estimated to be NGN 186,316.
2.2 Valuation of assets
Following the census exercise, an inventory of assets to be impacted by component 1 activities and assets valuation exercises were conducted. The objective of the asset valuation exercise was to determine the value of the asset to be impacted, and assigned a compensation amount that yield sufficient to replace the affected assets, plus necessary transaction costs associated with asset replacement.
ARAP June 2019
6
Valuation of assets to be affected by the implementation of the component 1 activities was conducted using a general principle adopted in the formulation of the compensation valuation, which follows the World Bank policy that lost income and asset will be valued at their full replacement cost such that the PAPs should not be worse-off than the pre-project level. The method employed to arrive at full replacement value is shown in the various sections of the proceeding paragraphs.
2.2.1 Valuation Method for Land
In line with OP4.12 of the World Bank on Involuntary Resettlement, land for land replacement is recommended including 10% provision for price inflation. The valuation method also considered the size of the land and the location of the land since these two variables are determinants of the land value. While the land acquired for the road rehabilitation is within the 12m RoW of the road corridor, it is also expected that land shall be needed for burrow-pits and construction camps.
The most preferred compensation for land is by giving another land at the location near the affected land, in which case the community leaders and PAP concern can help to identify the land to be used for the compensation. Where alternative land is not available within a reasonable distance, cash compensation at full replacement cost will be paid.
In a situation where cash for land is considered, the valuation will be the cost of land based on current value multiplied by the size and an addition of 10% inflation as shown in the below formula:
This is given as Lc = PC x Ls + Ir
Where LC = Land Compensation
Pc =Current Market Price
Ls = Land Size
Ir = Inflation rate (10%)
In addition to the above, the valuation method also considered a one- time lump sum grant of NGN 2,700,000 (US$ 7397) for restoration of livelihood and assistance for relocation.
Given that the identified PAPs conducting business activities within the existing RoW are categorized as encroachers, they shall not be entitled for land compensation. However, they are entitled for the replacement of structures or other properties on the encroached land.
2.2.2 Replacement Cost Method for Assets/Structures
The “Traditional Replacement Cost Method” was used in estimating the value of properties/structures to be affected by component 1 activities. The calculation is based on the assumption that the capital value of an existing development can be equated to the cost of reinstating the development on the same plot at the current labor, material and other incidental costs. The estimated value represents the cost of replacing the property as if it is new.
The best option is to provide alternative structures of better quality if possible. On the other hand, where cash compensation is opted for, it should be at full replacement cost considering the materials used for the structure, prices of item, cost of transportation and labor for construction of new similar structure.
ARAP June 2019
7
2.2.3 Crops/Trees
The “Damage Loss Assessment Method” is used to determine compensation for economic trees and agricultural products. Under this method, owners of the land shall be compensated at market value of yield per tree for the current season (agricultural season) and cost of re-planting and nursery is used to determine the compensation rate for the affected economic tree. The valuation for economic trees like Mango, Shea butter and Boabab was done using gross market value for one year, i.e. estimated yield (Gross )/year multiplied by year needed to grow trees of the same productivity. Compensation will be paid in cash and the PAPs will be encouraged to use money to replace the loss tree with improved variety that is more beneficial. The formula for calculating tree crops is expressed as follow:
Tc = Y x Pc x Pg
Where: Tc =Tree compensation
Y= Yield
Pc = Current Price
Pg = Growth Period
Non-economic trees: Cash compensation should be paid, while considering the wood value of the tree at current market value. The owner should be encouraged to plant another tree preferably economic tree.
Land tenants shall also be compensated at market value of yield per tree for the current season (agricultural season) and cost of re-planting and nursery should be used to determine the compensation rate for the economic tree.
2.2.4 Shrines or Place of Worship
PAPs covered in this category will be resettled or compensated for the value of the structure to be impacted based on the prevailing market value of the structure in Adamawa state. Where necessary, ceremonies or rites required for the replacement of the shrines should be costed and included in the compensation payment. 2.2.4 Compensation for public/community facilities
Replacement of the facilities is the most preferred option. Current price of the affected facility should be considered plus cost of installation, logistics etc. to replace the facility to its original status or better. On the basis of the above valuation methods, the asset valuation was conducted based on the current market prices of cost of materials in the project area plus 10% allocation for construction materials price inflation. Below is the outcome of the market survey carried out in August 2018 in Adamawa state Nigeria.
Table 2.5: Market Survey Result
Category Materials Unit Amount (Naira)
Structures (Building, Fence, Wall, Pavement, roof etc.)
Wooden Windows Number N 2500
Cement Kg N2700
Wooden Doors Number N7000
Length of Iron Mm N1900/N24
ARAP June 2019
8
Category Materials Unit Amount (Naira)
(10mm/12mm/16mm)
00/N3000
Zinc Bundle N 13000
Block (6”/9”) 1 sqm N 130/N 140
Wood/plank (2x2/2x4)
Number N 300/400
50kg bag of Sand Kg N 500
50kg bag of Stones Kg N 800
Average cost of Truck Hire from city to the Villages
N 15000
Labor cost: Mason, Carpenter, etc.
1 artisan Per day N 3,500/N2,000
ARAP June 2019
9
CHAPTER THREE: COMPENSATION AND OTHER RESETTLEMENT
ASSISTANCES
The objective of paying compensation and resettlement assistance is to assist PAPs to restore their assets and livelihood to a minimum at pre-project level if not better. Compensation payment to PAPs shall be in kind, cash or other assets given in exchange for the taking of land, or loss of other assets, including fixed assets thereon, in part or whole.
The roads to be rehabilitated has 8m carriage way and 2m road setback on each side of the road. Properties that are found within the 12m ROW along the road corridors are expected to be affected by component 1 activities. The inventory of assets carried out to identify properties to be affected by component 1 activities showed that land will be acquired; structures, crops and small businesses will be impacted. Crops planted on farmlands and associated economic trees were observed as important features that would be affected in the event of civil works along the corridor. It was also observed that some permanent, temporary structures and market fences to be impacted.
As depicted in table 3.1 below, a total of NGN 10,751,000 is allocated to offset compensation and resettlement assistance costs related to component 1 activities. The amount shall be provided by the Adamawa State Government and shall be deposited into the ‘escrow” account that will be opened and maintained for the purpose of paying compensation and resettlement assistance.
TABLE 3.1: SUMMARY OF IMPACT AND COSTS
Type of impact Naira USD %
Total Compensation for private properties 2,655,000 7,274 33
Total Compensation for Public and community Properties
2,390,000 6,548 30
Total Compensation for Agricultural losses 730,000 2,000 9
Total Compensation for business losses 1,526,000 4,181 19
Total Compensation for vulnerable people 750,000 2,055 9
One-time lump sum grant for livelihood restoration/assistance1
2,700,000 7,397
Grand Total 10,751,000 29,455 100
Exchange rate: USD1.00 = NGN365
3.1 Loss of Land:
It is expected that there will be loss of land resulting from the component 1 civil work activities. It is anticipated that a total of nine (9) PAPs will be impacted. These PAPs are mainly land owners within the 12m RoW and are found along the road corridor.
The average compensation amount per PAP, as shown in table 3.1, suggested that the amount of land to be taken for the project will be minor and negligible.
1 A one- time lump sum grant of NGN 2,700,000 (US$ 7397) is allocated for restoration of livelihood and assistance for
relocation.
ARAP June 2019
10
Table 3.1: Land to be impacted
Type of Facility Number of PAPs Total in Naira Total in US$ %
Land 9 630,000 1,726 100
Total 9 630,000 1,726 100
Note: the average compensation for the land is NGN 70,000 (USD 191)
Mitigation measure: Given that the amount of land loss is negligible, the land owner shall be given cash2 compensation for the land loss at replacement value based on market rate plus 10% of the land value as resettlement assistance as discussed in the valuation method for land. A total of NGN 630,000 (USD 1,725) is allocated in the compensation budget to cover land compensation cost to a total of 9 PAPs; and this amount constitute 9% of the total compensation package. The amount shall be paid to PAPs on time and before the start of component 1 civil works.
3.2 Loss of Buildings or Structure
It is expected that a total of 12 structures composed of extension of fences and shops as well as semi-permanent structures along the road alignments and within the ROW will be removed. PAPs might lose part of their structures and possibly income earned from them. Affected people are comprised of Individuals and families. Table 3.2 below depicts the overall picture of building and structures to be impacted.
Table 3.2: Private properties affected by type of building materials used
Type of material
Roof Number of structures/properties
Total Naira Total USD % of structures/properties
impacted
Thatch Thatch 6 520,000 1,425 50
Mud Thatch 2 410,000 1,123 17
Mud Zinc 4 1,095,000 3,000 33
Total 12 2,025,000 5,548 100
The result in the table 3.2 above suggests that people’s dwelling places reflect their economic status and well-being. The type of accommodation in which PAPs reside showed that 50% of the PAPs live in thatch wall and thatch roofed house; 17% reside in mud wall and thatch roofed houses, while 33% reside in mud wall and zinc roofed houses. The 50% and 17% of PAPs who resides in thatched – thatch, and mud - thatched houses signifies the level of risks faced by, and the extent of vulnerability faced by each of these categories of PAPs. Given the risks faced by these PAPs, the project shall pay special attention to these groups of PAPs while implementing this ARAP.
Mitigation measure: Owners of the structures whether or not the land on which the structure stands is legally occupied shall be paid: i) Cash compensation for loss of built-up structures at full replacement costs, ii) owners of affected structures will be allowed to take/reuse their salvageable materials for rebuilding/rehabilitation of structure and, iii) transfer allowance to cover cost of shifting (transport plus loading/unloading) the effects and materials will be paid on actual cost basis or on current market rates
2 Land for land compensation is preferred priority,
ARAP June 2019
11
as described in the section of valuation method in this ARAP. A total of NGN 2,025,000 or USD5,548 is allocated in the compensation budget to cover compensation cost of impacted structures; and this amount constitute 25% of the total compensation package. The amount shall be paid to PAPs on time and before the start of component 1 civil works.
3.3 Loss of business
It is expected that a total of 39 businesses will be impacted by civil work activities associated with the sub-project. These impacts are mainly temporary in nature and businesses are expected to resume operation after completion of civil work in each impact corridor. The structures to be demolished or relocated is first valued (see compensation matrix), in addition, even though, most of them will be operating their businesses at another temporary site for the period of the civil works, notwithstanding, they are bound to incur some losses. This has been incorporated to the compensation bills as disturbance allowance/loss of business earnings due to shift of business. Table 3.3 below contains the categories of business structures that are likely to be affected.
Table 3.3: Impacts on businesses compensations
Type of Business Number of Businesses Total in Naira Total in US %
Kiosks 6 315,000 863 21
Open shades 14 328,000 899 22
Shades 18 823,000 2,255 54
Containers 1 60,000 164 3
Total 39 1,526,000 4,181 100
Mitigation measures: A total of NGN1, 526, 000 (USD 4,181), representing 19% of the total of this ARAP budget, is allocated to meet resettlement assistance costs associated with temporary impacts of component 1 activities on businesses. The amount shall be paid to PAPs on time and before the start of component 1 civil works.
3.4 Loss of Economic Trees
It is expected that Mango, Neem, Boabab, and Shea butter trees are the dominant trees that will be lost. About 9 trees will be removed. The outcome of the inventory of trees and crops to be impacted by component 1 civil work activities showed that land will be acquired; crops and trees planted on farmlands will be affected.
As shown in table 3.4 below, 7 economic trees and other trees shall be removed. Famers who are the owners of these trees shall be compensated at NGN 650,000 for economic trees and NGN 80,000 for other trees. A total of NGN 730,000 is allocated to compensation and resettlement assistance budget to offset costs related to these impacts.
ARAP June 2019
12
Table 3.4: Crops and trees to be affected
Type of Crop Number of Crops Naira USD %
Economic Trees 5 650,000 1,781 90
Other Trees 2 80,000 219 10
Total 7 730,000 2000 100
Mitigation measure: Owner(s) or tenants who owned crops or trees, including encroachers/squatters shall be compensated in cash for loss of agricultural crops or trees at current market value of mature crops, based on average production as discussed in the valuation section of this ARAP. Compensation for loss of fruit trees for average fruit production years is computed at current market value. Compensation for loss of wood-trees is calculated at current market value of wood (timber or firewood, as the case may be). A total of NGN 730,000 or USD 2000 is allocated in the compensation budget to cover compensation cost of loss of economic crops and trees; and this amount constitute 9% of the total compensation package allocated in this ARAP. The amount shall be paid to PAPs on time and before the start of component 1 civil works.
3.5 Impact on Utilities
The public utilities identified within the ROW were four (4) electric poles and one (1) solar pole. This is expected to cause temporary loss of power within the communities benefiting from the electric and solar power poles. These will be relocated by the relevant electricity agency at the state (Transmission Company of Nigeria [TCN]).
Mitigation measures: The communities shall be informed prior to the relocation on the date for the relocation as well as the time it will take to restore power. Also, the relocation of the poles should be carried out within one day (24hrs) to reduce the impact from loss of power on the communities. This has to be coordinated with the Contractor, TCN and SPIU. Services shall be restored before the start of component 1 civil works.
3.6 Loss of access to common (community) property
It is expected that 1 uncompleted mud block mosque and 9 community properties that are within the ROW will be affected. The community structures are found in Danpakare, a market fence in Daksami, community Borehole in Kiri Timbura, and Temporary market stalls in Shelleng Bakta. Table 3.5 shows detail of common Properties.
Table 3.5: Public and Communities Facilities to be affected
Type of Facility Number of Businesses Total in Naira Total in US %
Public 9 2,245,000 6,151 94
Community 1 145,000 397 6
Total 10 2,390,000 6,548 100
Mitigation measure: A total of NGN 2,390,000 or USD 6,548 is allocated to ensure rehabilitation/restoration of the Mosques, Market fence at Daksami, Community Borehole at Kiri. This
ARAP June 2019
13
amount represents 30% of the total compensation and resettlement assistance budget reflected in this ARAP. Public and community structures to be impacted by component 1 will be fully paid by the project. The amount shall be paid on time and community structures will be restored before the start of component 1 civil works.
3.7 Impact on Vulnerable Group
It is expected that a total of 7 vulnerable people will be impacted by the project. As shown in table 3.6, of the total 7 vulnerable people to be impacted 3 are elderly, 1 is disable, and 3 are extremely poor.
Table 3.6: Categories of vulnerable people to be impacted
Vulnerable Group Gender Total
Total Resettlement Assistance - Naira
Total Resettlement Assistance - USD
%
Male Female
Elderly 3 0 3 300,000 822 40
Disability 1 0 1 150,000 411 20
Extremely Poor 2 1 3 300,000 822 40
Total 6 1 7 750,000 2,055 100
Mitigation measure: PAPs who by their disadvantage conditions will be economically worse impacted by project activities than others (elderly, disabled and the extreme poor) are considered vulnerable. They will be provided with cash and in-kind assistances. A total of NGN 750,000 or USD 2,055 is allocated into the ARAP resettlement assistance budget to offset cost associated with impacts of vulnerable people. This allocation represents 9% of the total compensation and resettlement assistance budget. The amount shall be paid to vulnerable people on time and before the start of component 1 civil works.
ARAP June 2019
14
CHAPTER FOUR: CONSULTATIONS
Consultations with PAPs and other stakeholders are critical in the conduct of any resettlement exercise. The objective of consultations is to get the views of the stakeholders about the intended development, and also provide an opportunity to discuss the intended resettlement or displacement activities with the PAPs. Consultation were held from March 14th - 18th, 2019 for PAPs across 10 locations. A total of 59 PAPs attended the consultations. Of the total consulted, 54 were male and 5 females.
During the consultations, the PAPs were informed about their rights and choices regarding compensations. They were given opportunities to express their views freely. Minutes from the consultations are attached as Annex 2 to this ARAP.
4.1 Consultation method
The methodology employed during the consultations included: focal group discussions and face-to-face discussions with community stakeholders and PAPs.
Discussions highlighted the fact that the project will be a large-scale rehabilitation/construction of the selected rural roads across the state and that due to the magnitude of the project, there will be foreseeable involuntary resettlement concerns, especially on the people and their structures during the civil works.
4.2 Choices and Rights
The OP. 4.12 supports the need to consult with PAPs, and inform them about their options and rights pertaining to resettlements. During consultations, the PAPs were adequately informed of their rights, and resettlement options available to them, e.g., in the area of land-to-land or land-to-money compensations for assets and structures. They were also informed of their “Power of choice” which establishes their options to agree or disagree with the land acquisition and economic displacements, without adverse consequences imposed formally or informally on them.
Furthermore, PAPs were sensitized on the sub-project aims, which will impact more positively the social and economic conditions of the entire project area. PAPs were also informed about the potential direct economic and social impacts that may result from land acquisition by the project. They were equally informed that the project will devise suitable and proportional social mitigation measures to address the risks and impacts associated with the development. These measures will be integral parts of the ARAP and the Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) that will be geared toward reducing or eliminate negative social impacts on the people.
4.3 Concerns and Resolutions
PAPs were also given opportunities to express their concerns and contribution – in terms of impact and the overall project design. The major concerns from the stakeholders’ consultation and the engagement with the PAPs are summarized in table 4.1 below.
ARAP June 2019
15
Table 4.1: The project communities for the twenty-nine roads under RAMP2 were consulted
Stakeholders Concerns Responses
1 Concerns over loss of shelter and social networks
The ARAP will address all issues concerning loss of structure including shelter. Compensation will be paid to all PAPs at full replacement cost. The civil work will be temporary and efforts will be made to ensure that the works are completed timely without much delay to manage concerns on social networks.
2 Worries over the possibility of inadequate notice from the authorities in charge of resettlement implementation
RAMP-2 considers the plight of all persons especially the PAPs and vulnerable groups, and will ensure that adequate notices regarding the resettlement are provided timely. Consultations will be carried out continuously, and the SPIU will implement a Grievance redress mechanism (GRM) to handle all complaints and grievances on resettlements and other issues. Some members of the community will also constitute as members of the GRM committees.
3 PAPs expressed fear of being made worse off than they were before the project
Adequate and timely compensation will be made before the commencement of civil works. Effort will be made to provide livelihood enhancement opportunities to PAPs and vulnerable person/groups where expedient.
4 The most important issues over which all PAPs raised concerns were the inadequacy of compensation for affected assets, and restoration of livelihoods
Adequate compensation will be given based on World Bank policy on Involuntary Resettlement.
5 Affected people are concerned about the inconvenience of potential relocation, if any, and loss of livelihoods
The OP 4.12 policy will be strictly adhered to. The ARAP document is prepared using this policy which addressed all concerns as it relates to potential relocation and loss of livelihood. Compensations to all PAPs will be implemented prior to commencement of civil works.
6 Delay and untimely compensation
7 Many PAPs show cash preferences over the project taking responsibility for replacing fully and partially affected structures.
PAPs have the right to make a choice between replacement and cash settlement
The pictures from the consultation meetings are shown below.
ARAP June 2019
16
Meeting at Muchala
Meeting with Ndikong community
PLATE 1: PICTURES OF CONSULTATION MEETINGS
ARAP June 2019
17
CHAPTER FIVE: INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR
IMPLEMENTATION
This ARAP recognizes the cross-ministerial coordination and collaboration of the many Federal and State Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) as well as local governments and communities involved in RAMP 2. This brought about the development of institutional arrangements amongst public agencies with local communities and PAPs with a view to ensuring good project management. The implementation of this ARAP shall require close collaboration among all the stakeholders with a properly constituted structure for administration which shall be agreed by all parties from the onset.
This institutional arrangement presents the relevant institutions and the responsibilities they are expected to discharge for effective implementation of the ARAP.
5.1 World Bank (WB) and French Development Agency (AFD)
The World Bank and the French Development Agency are jointly responsible for providing the funding for the implementation of the project. In addition to that, they are also responsible for the following:
• Maintains an oversight role to ensure compliance with the safeguards policies, review and provide clearance and approval for the ARAP.
• Review of the ARAP and provision of No-Objection for ARAP disclosure and Implementation
• Ensure compliance with all National and State legislation that may be enforced
• Conduct regular supervision for satisfactory ARAP implementation, fulfilment of community liaison and provide support role throughout the project implementation, and monitor the progress of the project construction.
• Recommend additional measures for strengthening the management framework and implementation performance.
• In case the WB considers the sub-project implementation as unacceptable, with no improvements expected, the Bank will require that institutional capacity building measures be taken to strengthen the SPIU.
5.2 Federal Project Management Unit (FPMU)
In order to ensure effective project implementation, the Federal Project Management Unit (FPMU) at the Federal level and the Adamawa State Project Implementation Unit (AD-SPIU) at the state level are responsible for regular coordination and monitoring of project activities. The FPMU shall be responsible to provide overall guidance to the AD-SPIU, this includes review of:
• Annual Work Plans and Procurement Plans (Particularly ARAP preparation and Implementation) prior to their submission to the World Bank for approval;
• Support and ensure smooth implementation of the ARAP in adherence to World Bank Operational Policies. This is in form of monitoring & evaluation and provision of technical back-stopping when necessary;
• Ensure timely submission of the TOR for ARAP preparation and the ARAP report to IDA and AFD as well as its disclosure in-country;
• Internal monitoring of ARAP activities; and
• Preparation of progress reports and submission to the World Bank for review.
ARAP June 2019
18
5.3 Federal Ministry of Environment
The role FMEnv will play in this project is one of monitoring, and will include:
• Provision of advice on screening, scoping, review of draft ARAP report (in liaison with State Ministry of Environment) according to Federal Guidelines, State Laws and World Bank Safeguards policies,
• Receive comments from stakeholders, public hearing of the project proposals, and convening a technical decision-making panel (in liaison with State Ministry of Environment),
5.4 Adamawa State Ministry of Environment
The role SMEnv will play in this project is one of monitoring, and will include:
• Receiving periodic monitoring reports from the SPIU on project implementation
• Provision of advice on screening, scoping, review of draft ARAP report (in liaison with Federal Ministry of Environment) according to Federal Guidelines, State Laws and World Bank Safeguards policies,
• Receive comments from stakeholders, public hearing of the project proposals, and convening a technical decision-making panel (in liaison with Federal Ministry of Environment),
5.5 State Ministry of Land and Survey
The role of the State Ministry of Land and Survey in this project is one of monitoring. This will include:
• Oversee compliance at State Level, on matters of Land Acquisition and compensation and other resettlement issues,
• Review of draft ARAP report (in liaison with Federal Ministry of Environment) according to Federal Guidelines, State Laws and World Bank Safeguards policies,
5.6 State Project Implementation Unit (SPIU)
The SPIUs will be responsible for monitoring the environment and social impacts and mitigation measures resulting from the action of their contractors, sub-contractors, transporters, suppliers and all other third parties in the course of their duties under the sub-project. The SPIU shall be responsible for the followings:
• Liaise closely with Ministry of Environment in preparing a coordinated response on the environmental and social aspects of project development;
• Develop and implement ARAPs and other safeguard instruments;
• Study in detail the ARAP, and based on the review of the ARAP prepare a detailed action plan and time table for the day to day ARAP implementation;
• Establish all local level institutions and committees (Grievance Redress Committees [GRC], Resettlement Implementation Committee [RIC], etc.) which will participate in the implementation of the ARAP and provide them with the necessary training and capacity building measures;
• Coordinates and undertake compensation activities in accordance with the principles and procedures specified in the ARAP
• Implement the ARAP including their involvement to redress complaints and internal monitoring;
• Implement the income restoration and social development programs and project in accordance with the principles and procedures specified in the ARAP;
ARAP June 2019
19
• Ensure the systematic undertaking of monitoring, review and evaluation of the ARAP in accordance with the framework and guidelines provided in the ARAP and store the data and information collected in a data base;
• Based on the findings of the monitoring and review take corrective actions and submit monitoring and review reports to the relevant higher bodies for timely corrective measure;
• Facilitate the discussion between PAPs and communities regarding compensation for land acquired for the projects as well as impacts on assets by the project component;
• Cooperate through their Steering Committee that provides guidance to the technical aspects of the ARAP activities;
• Maintain and manage all funds effectively and efficiently for the ARAP;
• Organize the necessary orientation and training for SPIU officials so that they can carry out consultations with communities and implement the payment of compensation and other measures (relocation and rehabilitation entitlement) to PAPs in a timely manner; and
• Ensure that progress reports are submitted to the FPMU regularly.
5.7 Social Safeguards Officer for the SPIU (SSO-SPIU)
The Social Safeguard officers, will be responsible for the following:
• identify and liaise with all relevant stakeholders pre and post project implementation;
• sensitization of and consultations with relevant stakeholders during and after (where necessary) project implementation;
• coordinate on behalf of SPIU day to day activities with the relevant line departments involved in the implementation of ARAP instrument;
• supervising the effective implementation of this ARAP prepared and acting in collaboration with the Supervising Engineers to ensure Contractors compliance to all the safeguards regulations and code of conduct;
• identifying the social, resettlement and compensation issues with the aim of addressing problems, promptly; and
• provide interface between the SPIU and the community to ensure proper implementation of the ARAP.
5.8 Adamawa State Community and Social Development Agency
The Adamawa State CSDA in liaison with the SPIU, shall be responsible for ensuring the involvement and active participation of the local communities in development projects undertaken in the state.
5.9 Others
5.9.1 Community and Village Heads, Opinion Leaders
• They shall be responsible in supporting the project by providing local workforce and will also participate by ensuring that the workers are of good behavior
• They shall also guarantee a peaceful environment for the road rehabilitation and construction work by promoting security of lives and properties.
ARAP June 2019
20
• They shall liaise with the Community Grievance Redress Committee (CGRC) in addressing grievance and complaints that may arise as a result of the project component.
5.9.2 Community Grievance Redress Committee (CGRC)
The grievance redress mechanism describes the procedure as well as a number of multi-layered mechanisms to settle grievances and complaints resulting from resettlement and compensation in- house, at local level (See chapter eight for full details). The Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) will be formed at the community level. This committee will provide ample opportunity to redress complaints informally at the communities in addition to the existing formal administrative and legal procedures.
The Grievance Redress Committee shall be responsible for the following:
• Provide interface between the community and the SPIU/FPMU;
• Provide interface between the Contractors and the Communities;
• Organize meetings with project affected persons in view of addressing their complaints
• Ensure smooth implementation of the ARAP by adequately addressing all complaints and grievances promptly; and
• Carry out all responsibilities as may be directed by FPMU.
ARAP June 2019
21
CHAPTER SIX: MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) activities under this ARAP shall ensure that compensation, resettlement and development investments are on track to achieve sustainable restoration and improvement in the welfare of the PAPs. Furthermore, M&E verifies that entitlements are delivered promptly and complaints and grievances are followed up with appropriate corrective action. Monitoring will provide both a warning system for the proponent and a channel for the affected persons to make known their needs and their reactions to resettlement execution.
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of the ARAP will be carried out throughout the project implementation process. Specifically, the implementation of ARAP starts from identification, valuation and validation to compensation and beyond (livelihood restoration). This is to ensure that the objectives are met and successful implementation of the ARAP occurs.
The M&E process will ensure that the following are achieved:
• Compensations are paid out timely and at all replacement cost;
• Living standards of PAPs are improved;
• Specific impacts on vulnerable households are improved;
• transparency and accountability of project resources are optimized;
• Identification of potential problem and provision of workable solution; and
• the ARAP is effectively implemented, and lessons learnt are documented for future reference.
6.1 Impact Monitoring and Evaluation
Impact monitoring and evaluation are spot and final checks, to confirm that resettlement investments achieve their intermediate and final objectives.
Table 6.1 below provides the M& E framework for the implementation of the ARAP
Table 6.1: M&E Framework
OTPUT MONITORING FRAMEWORK AND INDICATORS
Items to be monitored; Consultations/Notification/Agreement
Domain /Sub-domain
Indicator Method Frequency Responsible Institution
Resettlement Implementation Committee (RIC)
Minutes and records of meetings
Community meetings, Consultation forums
Monthly SPIU, Communication Officer and Social Safeguard Officer
PAPs Minutes and records of meetings
One on one engagement Monthly SPIU, Social Safeguard Officer and M & E
Community Minutes and records of meetings
Town hall meeting, focal group consultations, consultations
Monthly SPIU and M & E and Social Safeguard Officer
Cash disbursement
Disbursement of cash assistance to PAPs
Number, percentage of PAPs paid
Verification of payment records. Signing of receipt documents, video recording of
Before commencem
SPIU, Social Safeguard Officer, Project
ARAP June 2019
22
promptly. Payment delays, pending and closed out
public/transparent disbursement events.
ent of civil work
Accountant and M & E Officer
Complaints records If any impact occurs during project duration
Social Safeguard
IMPACT MONITORING FRAMEWORK AND INDICATORS
Compensations impacts
PAP satisfaction/complaints
RAP Implementation report Site verification Complaints records External audit
Witness NGO report
End of ARAP according to ARAP schedule
SPIU, External Social Safeguard Auditor
ARAP June 2019
23
CHAPTER SEVEN: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AND BUDGET
The implementation schedule developed for the ARAP implementation will ensure that no civil work will start before compensation and resettlement assistances to PAPs are fully paid. The sum of Nineteen million, Two hundred and eighty-six thousand three hundred Naira only (NGN 19,286,300.00) is budgeted for compensation and resettlement assistance. The amount shall be deposited into the special account two weeks prior to commencement of payments to PAPs.
7.1 Implementation Schedule
The timetable in table 7.1 below is meant to guide the implementation of ARAP in a logical manner. It is important that before operation commences in the project area, all PAPs need to be adequately compensated based on the recommendations following the valuation of PAPs’ assets. The implementation schedule for completing ARAP related activities is presented in table 7.1.
Table 7.1: Time Table for ARAP Compensation
Proposed Activities Period
April May June July
Submission of Draft Final RAP Report
Field Verification and Comments
Update of comments
Submission of final ARAP Document
Advertisement in two local news paper
Publish in the WB info shop
Commencement of ARAP implementation
Completion of ARAP implementation
Commencement of Civil work
7.2 Capacity Building
Capacity building is necessary and should be a continuous process in every system. Following the assessment of the various parties that would be involved in the implementation of the ARAP, there is need to build their capacity in certain key areas for successful implementation of the ARAP. The SPIU staff that will be involved in the Resettlement committee, Grievance Redress committee etc. will need capacity building in their respective areas. This is to adequately prepare them to handle issues regarding involuntary resettlement and grievance issues during the ARAP implementation.
Similarly, other staff of Ministry and Agencies such as Environment and Health and members of the community including the Contractor that will be involved in ARAP’s monitoring, need to be trained on the procedure and requirements for ARAP implementation. The capacity building schedule and cost is presented in table 7.2.
ARAP June 2019
24
TABLE 7.2: CAPACITY BUILDING SCHEDULE AND COST
Duration Item Module Who to Train Resources Estimated Amount
2 Days Involuntary Resettlement and Rehabilitation Protocol
Principles of Resettlement Action Plan Monitoring & Evaluation of ARAP Implementation Public Involvement and Consultation in ARAP
SPIU, LG, Contractors, Engineers, & relevant MDAs, Community leaders/CBOs/NGOs/PAPs
Full text of OP 4.12 for each participant PowerPoint Presentation Associated Handouts
N2,150,000
1 Day Grievance Redress Mechanism
Conflict Management and Resolution in ARAP
SPIU, members of Resettlement and Grievance Redress Committees
PowerPoint Presentation Associated Handouts
N1,320,000
1 Day Basics of Livelihood Restoration
Cash Management and Monitoring Book keeping and Record Management Investment Decision making. (The objective of providing these trainings is to improve the capacity of the PAPs which will ensure the sustainability of their businesses)
SPIU, All the PAPs PowerPoint Presentation Associated Handouts
N2,650,000
TOTAL: N6,120,000
7.3 Budget
A total of Nineteen million, two hundred and eighty-six thousand three hundred Naira only (NGN 19,286,300.00) is budgeted to advance implementation of this ARAP. The total ARAP budget shall be provided by the Adamawa State Government. The amount shall be deposited to a special account that will be opened and maintained by SPIU. The various line items and associated costs are shown in table 7.3 below:
Table 7.3: Summary of Budget Estimate for ARAP Implementation
Budget Item NGN USD %
Total Compensation for private properties 2,655,000 7,274 14
ARAP June 2019
25
Budget Item NGN USD %
Total Compensation for Public and comm. Properties 2,390,000 6,548 12
Total Compensation for Agricultural losses 730,000 2,000 4
Total Compensation for business losses 1,526,000 4,181 8
Total Compensation for vulnerable people 750,000 2,055 4
One-time lump sum grant for livelihood restoration/assistance 2,700,000 7,397 14
Total Compensation and resettlement assistance 10,751,000 29,455
Consultation, awareness building and training
6,120,000
16,767
32
ARAP Operating cost 3 (10% of total compensation & resettlement assistance)
805,100
2,206
4
20% provision of compensation and resettlement for price contingency
1,610,200
4,412
8
Grand total 19,286,300 52,839 100
3 This is a provision for ARAP operating cost Implementation and Monitoring Activities/Contingency
ARAP June 2019
26
CHAPTER EIGHT: GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM
Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) is a locally based, formalized way to accept, assess and resolve stakeholder feedback or complaints. It creates a platform and procedure for effective handling of complaints and grievances that are aimed at avoiding lengthy litigation which may mare or delay project implementation.
The likelihood of disputes to occur during the sub-project implementation will be greatly reduced because consultations have already been carried out with some of the affected persons. Nevertheless, in the event that grievances arise this redress mechanism has been prepared. Already, the affected persons have been helped to appreciate that there are provisions for addressing any complaints or grievances. The grievance procedure will further be made available to the affected person through project implementation.
The major grievances that might require mitigation include:
• Dispute between contractors and the stakeholders;
• Dispute between contractors and the PAPs;
• Losses not identified correctly;
• Inadequate assistance;
• Dispute about ownership;
• Delay in disbursement of assistance and improper distribution of assistance;
• PAPs not identified during the census survey.
A Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) will be established, to achieved the following functions:
• Announce information about the establishment and functions of GRM to the public
• Accept, review and documents grievances received
• Communicate resolution to the complainant
• Ensure that all notices, forms, and other documentation required by Claimants are made available
and accessible to them.
• Ensure documentation of all received complaints and the progress of resolution.
• Establish a feedback system (making sure that PAPs are informed about the outcome of
investigations and actions taken on each case).
The members of the GRC will include community leaders who may serve as chairmen, PAPs representatives, community-based organization (CBO) working in the project affected community/ local government, elected representative of the community at the local government, affected local government lands/forestry officer and the SPIU.
The GRC will operate a conflict resolution mechanism that makes the judicial system less desirable and the last resort to redress grievances if informal conciliation does not resolve the matter.
8.1 Grievances and appeals procedure
This grievance procedure is prepared in line with the provision of the RPF for RAMP-2. The need to provide a forum locally to receive, hear and resolve disputes is in the best interest of all parties to forestall the
ARAP June 2019
27
lengthy process of litigation, which could affect the progress of project. Therefore, the setting of Grievance Redress Committee early during project implementation is desirable.
8.1.1 Grievance Redress Process
There is no ideal model or one-size-fits-all approach to grievance resolution. The best solutions to conflicts are generally achieved through localized mechanisms that take account of the specific issues, cultural context, local customs, and project conditions and scale.
In its simplest form, grievance mechanisms can be broken down into the following primary components:
• Receiving and registering a complaint.
• Screening and assessing the complaint.
• Formulating a response.
• Selecting a resolution approach.
• Implementing the approach.
• Announcing the result.
• Tracking and evaluating the results.
• Learning from the experience and communicate back to all parties involved.
• Preparing a timely report to management on the nature and resolution of grievances.
8.1.2 Structure of Grievance Redress for the Road Rehabilitation Works
The AD-RAMP 2 Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) shall receive and act upon complaints from stakeholders or PAPs in relation to any occurrences for which the Project is directly responsible (or believed to be responsible), and which are perceived by the aggrieved party to have involved corrupt, illegal, unjust, or unfair activities, omissions, or behavior.
For the purposes of the AD-RAMP 2, a complaint is a notification (in written, verbal or electronic form) regarding project activities and/or conduct of staff, consultants, partners and/or sub- contractors, directly or indirectly supporting the project or associated with its implementation, which the complainant believes is wrong, either under the law or on the grounds of unacceptable behavior.
The complainant(s) need not be personally aggrieved or impacted, and may be acting merely in accordance with a sense of civic duty in bringing an occurrence to the attention of project authorities.
In defining the levels of grievance redress, priority was given to aligning with the existing mechanism and strengthening same as required, which was designed based on consultation and stakeholder inclusion during the preparation of the ARAP. Defining the GRM process took into account the specific issues, cultural context, local customs, industry standards and project conditions. The functioning of the GRM system, how to register complaints (written, by phone, or in person), where to go and hours of service, all should be clearly explained in local language (Hausa) during initial public consultations on the project.
8.1.3 Expectation When Grievances Arise
When local people present a grievance, they expect to be heard and taken seriously. Therefore, the SPIU and others such as the engineers involved in one aspect of the sub-project or other must convince people that they can voice grievances and work to resolve them without retaliation. It should be understood that
ARAP June 2019
28
all or any of the followings is or are expected from the project management/channel of grievance resolution by the local people:
• acknowledgement of their problem;
• an honest response to questions/issues brought forward;
• an apology, adequate compensation; and
• Modification of the conduct that caused the grievance and some other fair remedies.
8.1.4 Management of Reported Grievances
The procedure for managing grievances should be as follows:
• The affected person files his/her grievance relating to any issue associated with the resettlement process or compensation, in writing or telephonically, to the project Resettlement and Compensation committee (phone numbers will be provided by the SPIU). When received in writing, the grievance note should be signed and dated by the aggrieved person. When received telephonically, the receiver should document all details.
• A selected member of the Grievance Redress Committee will act as the Project Liaison Officer who will be the direct liaison with PAPs in collaboration with an independent agency/person ensure to objectivity in the grievance process.
• Where the affected person is unable to write, the local Project Liaison Officer will write the note on the aggrieved person’s behalf.
• Any informal grievances will also be documented
8.1.5 Monitoring Complaints
The Project Liaison Officer will be responsible for:
• Providing the Grievance Redress Committee with a weekly report detailing the number and status of complaints;
• Any outstanding issues to be addressed;
• Monthly reports, including analysis of the type of complaints, levels of complaints, actions to reduce complaints and initiator of such action.
8.1.6 Grievance Redress Institutions
A three-tier grievance redress mechanism has been designed in the event of dissatisfaction of any Project Affected Person (PAP) with the compensation process and other aspects of project implementation. These are described below.
A. First Level GRM: GRC at the Site/Community Level:
Complaints regarding project implementation and activities arising from the project area shall be channeled to the Village head, who shall convene the GRC committee at that level to review and address the complaint. The underlying merit is that the community has proven a notable channel for conflict resolution in the project area. The Village head shall head this committee while membership of the committee will consist of:
• The Village head -Chairman
• A representative of Council of Elders
ARAP June 2019
29
• A representative of the Community Development Association
• A representative of Youth Organization
• Representative of the Women Group
• Social Safeguards Officer of the SPIU-Secretary
This committee will be expected to report to the SPIU. In addition, complaint box will be placed in the Community leader’s palace, where complaints from PAPs can be dropped.
The complaints are received (in written, verbal or electronic form) at various points at Community Level. These may come through;
a) Complaint box b) Mobile application (WhatsApp, Telegram) Complaint line c) Toll-free/hot lines
The various points of receiving complaints at the community level would be as follows:
a) Respective LGAs; b) Community Town hall c) Designated spots along the road d) Traditional Ruler’s Palace e) Social safeguards/GBV Officers at SPIU
After registering the complaint in the Grievance Redressal Registration and Monitoring Sheet, the Social Safeguards Officer of SPIU will study the complaint made in detail and forward the complaint to the State Project Coordinator (SPC) with specific dates for replying and redressing the same. The SPIU shall issue an acknowledgement letter within five working days, including an outline of the complaint review and appeal process. A written response shall be issued within two weeks. The SPIU can also coordinate a meeting with the aggrieved party if required. To address such issues in an expedient manner, the SPIU shall nominate a sub-committee to handle complaints. The sub-committee may adopt any of the traditional methods (community meetings, elders-in- council, dialogue, council of chiefs, appeals and summons, elder’s assembly, religious leaders, youth council, women groups) that is accessible and affordable in the settlement of complaints if required. The deliberations of the meetings and decisions taken are recorded.
The resolution at the first tier will be normally be done within 14 working days and notified to the concerned through a disclosure form. Should the Grievance not be solved within this period, this would be referred to the next level of Grievance Redressal. However, if the social safeguard officer feels that it would require a few more days for actions to be taken, she/he can decide on retaining the issue at the first level by informing the complainant accordingly. However, if the complainant requests for an immediate transfer of the issue to the next level, it would be accepted and the issue would be taken to the next channel. But in any case, if the issue is not addressed within 21 days, it needs to be taken to the next level.
B. Second Level of GRM: GRC at the SPIU Level:
The SPIU shall receive, hear and address complaints arising from the project implementation. The Project Coordinator (PC) shall head this committee while membership of the committee shall be as follows:
• Project Coordinator- Chairman
• Internal Auditor
ARAP June 2019
30
• Monitoring and Evaluation officer
• Social Safeguard Officer- Secretary
• Environmental officer
• Communications Officer
• One representative of the non-state sector from within the State Project Monitoring Committees
If the complaint is not satisfied by the first level GRC response nor has a complaint regarding their decision-making process, they can directly write to the SPIU. All complaints submitted to the SPIU shall be logged with a unique ID code. Complainants shall receive an acknowledgement letter within 5 working days, including an outline of the complaint review and appeal process. The complaint shall be filed according to a tracking system, so that complaints are classified, and responded to consistently. Furthermore, the complaint shall be discussed within the SPIU and responded to in writing within 2 weeks. The SPIU shall also convene a meeting of the aggrieved parties if required. The SPIU shall undertake a six-monthly internal review of the complaint handling mechanism, and make necessary corrections, if need be.
The SPIU-GRC will hold the necessary meetings with the complainant and the concerned officers and attempt to find a solution acceptable at all levels. GRC would record the minutes of the meeting.
The decisions of the PIU-GRC are communicated to the complainant formally and if he accepts the resolutions, the complainant’s acceptance is obtained on a disclosure form.
If the complainant does not accept the solution offered by the SPIU-GRC, then the complaint is passed on to the next level / or the complainant can reach the next level. The Chairman of the SPIU-GRC would require to forward the issue to the next level through the Secretary of the SPIU-GRC to facilitate in exploring a solution to this at this level before transferring it to the Third level. In any case the case should be forwarded to the next level if no solution is reached within 14 days of the case reaching the second level and, in a case(s), nearing the required solution, it can be retained to an extent of 21 days.
C. Third Level of GRM: GRC at the State Technical Committee Level:
If the complainant is not satisfied with the Community or SPIU response or has a complaint about the overall AD-RAMP 2, or there is a time delay of more than a month in solving the issue, the complainant can opt to consider taking it to overall Technical Committee GRC (TC-GRC) facilitated by the State Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. This committee shall convene on a case-by case basis, arbitrate the issue based on the guidelines established, and convene the necessary stakeholders if necessary. All the stakeholders, including state and non-state actors shall be able to lodge a complaint with the TC-GRC.
The TC-GRC will be constituted as the Third Level of Redressal to look into the problems not solved in the Second Level. Membership of the GRC at this level shall constitute as follows:
• The Permanent Secretary of the Ministry -Chairman;
• Director Ministry of Environment
• Director Bureau of Lands & Survey
• The Project Coordinator of AD-RAMP 2
• A witnessing NGO
The Traditional/Community Leaders and the Commissioner of Local Government of the project Community will be the invitees to the Committee meetings to enable the TC-GRC to understand the deliberations of the Community Level GRC.
ARAP June 2019
31
The Social Safeguard Officer of the SPIU will collect all the details of the Grievance including the deliberations of First and Second level efforts and present it to the TC-GRC. The TC-GRC will deliberate upon the issue and give suitable recommendations. The meetings are recorded. The decisions of the TC-GRC are communicated to the complainant formally and if he accepts the resolutions, the complainant’s acceptance is obtained on a disclosure form.
The decisions of the TC-GRC would be final from the Project side and the Complainant may decide to take a legal or any other recourse if he /she is not satisfied with the resolutions due to the deliberations of the Third Level GRC. The Complainant has also the option of approaching the Donor (World Bank), if they find that the established GRM cannot resolve the issue.
8.2 The World Bank Grievance Redress Service (GRS)
The World Bank Grievance Redress Service (GRS) ensures that complaints are promptly reviewed and addressed by the responsible units in the World Bank. The objective is to make the Bank more accessible for project affected communities and to help ensure faster and better resolution of project-related complaints. The GRS is open to all those who believe they have been affected by a Bank-financed project. The GRS requires the complainant to express their grievances in writing to The World Bank Office by downloading, filling the GRS complaint form from the World Bank website and submitting same after signing. Details the World Bank GRS can be found in http://www.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/products-and-services/grievance-redress-service.
ARAP June 2019
32
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Involuntary resettlement may cause severe long-term hardship, impoverishment, and environmental
damage unless appropriate measures are carefully planned and carried out. For these reasons, the overall
objectives of the Bank's policy on involuntary resettlement are the following:
(a) Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring all viable
alternative project designs;
(b) Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be conceived and
executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient investment resources to enable the
persons displaced by the project to share in project benefits. Displaced persons should be meaningfully
consulted and should have opportunities to participate in planning and implementing resettlement
programs.
(c) Displaced persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and standards of living
or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels or to levels prevailing prior to the
beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher.
This policy covers direct economic and social impacts that both result from Bank-assisted investment
projects, and are caused by:
a) the involuntary taking of land resulting in (I)relocation or loss of shelter; (ii) loss of assets or access
to assets, or (iii) loss of income sources or means of livelihood, whether or not the affected
persons must move to another location; or
b) the involuntary restriction of access to legally designated parks and protected areas resulting in
negative impacts on the livelihoods of the displaced persons.
ARAP June 2019
33
REFERENCES
Adamawa State Government and NBS. (2015). RAPID: The Change we seek raising our Quality of Life.
Adamawa State Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) Nigeria Emergency Response week
4 2018 (January 22-28).
Adamawa State Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) Nigeria Emergency Response week
4 2018 (January 22-28).
Adamawa State RAMP 1 (2015) Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAB)
Adebayo A. A (1999): Climate II; Rainfall In Adebayo and Tukur (Eds.) Adamawa state in maps. Paraclete
publishers, Yola, Nigeria
Adebayo, A.A.,and Tukur, A.L.(1999) Adamawa State in Maps Publication.Department of Geography,
Federal University of Technology Yola, In Cooperation with Paraclete Publications,Nigeria.
Science and Education. An Access and Academic Publisher.
Adewumi, A.S. (2013): Analysis of land use / Land coverpattern along the River Benue channel in Adamawa
State, Nigeria. Academic Journal of interdisciplinary studies. Vol 2 No. 5, July 2013, ISSN 2281 –
3993. MCSER – CEMAS – Sapienza University of Rome
Akosim, C. Kwaga, B.T.,Amadi, D.C.A. and Inah E.I. (2007). Ecological Potentials of Beekeeping in Adamawa
State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Sciences, Environment and
Technology (ASSET).University of Agriculture, Abeokuta − Nigeria pp 67-76
ILLER Bank (2016) Sustainable Cities Project: Land Acquisition and Resettlement Policy Framework (LARPF)
Ishaku J.M. et. al. (2015): Ground Water Quality and Hydrogeochemistry of Toungo Area, Adamawa State,
Northeast Nigeria. American Jouran of Mining and Metallurgy vol. 3, No. 3, 2015 pp 66 –
73.
Maitera, O. N., Louis, h., Emmanuel, y. y., Akakuru, O. U., and Nosike E. I. (2018) Air Quality Index of CO
and NO2 in Ambient Air of Jimeta/Yola Metropolis, Adamawa State, Nigeria. Advances in
Analytical Chemistry ISSN 2163-2847, 2018, 8(1):1-5.
Richard et. al. (2018): Estimation of Soil Erosion Risk in Mubi South Watershed, Adamawa State, Nigeria.
Journal of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System. 7.226, vol. 7 (1). ISSN: 2469 – 4134
World Bank (2004). Involuntary Resettlement Source Book: Planning and Implementation in Development
Project
World Bank (2011) Operational Manual. OP 4.12, Annex A- Involuntary Resettlement Instruments,
(Institutional Framework)
World Bank (2013). Operational Manual. 0 P 4. 12- Involuntary Resettlement Revised 2013
World Bank (2018) Resettlement Policy Framework for the Trade and Transportation Facility Albania
October 2018
ARAP June 2019
34
ANNEX 1: DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROPOSED 361.7KM PHASE II RURAL
ROADS UNDER RAMP – 2 IN ADAMAWA STATE
S/No. ZONE L.G.A ROAD LENGTH (Km)
1. Southern Shelleng Shelleng – Bodwei 8.7
2. Southern Shelleng Shelleng – Bodwei 12.1
3. Southern Guyuk Kola Junction – Boshikiri
(Dumna Ward)
14.0
4. Southern Numan Lawai – Yanga 1.8
5. Southern Numan Numan – Biu Road – Bare 5.5
6. Southern Mayo Belwa Daba- Mayo Belwa 20.6
7. Southern Mayo Belwa Pole Wire – Ndikong 13.5
8. Southern Jada Longa Ewa – Wuro Abbo –
Wuro Yombe
16.9
9. Southern Jada/Mayo Belwa Jada –Gangyaki Mummuye –
Tola
22.5
10. Southern Toungo Toungo – Kiri 11.3
11. Southern Ganye Ganye – Santasa – Gurum Pawo 14.2
12. Central Yola South Boggare – Kabawa 1.4
13. Central Yola South Ngurore/Mayo Belwa road –
Gongoshi
9.2
14. Central Yola South/Fufore Yolde pate prison – Yadim 28.1
15. Central Fufore Gurin – Filingo 18.0
16. Central Fufore Parda – Muninga 18.0
17. Central Girei Bajabure Federal housing
phase II – Dakri GDSS Damare
4.7
18. Central Song Loko – Hombo 17.6
19. Central Song Song – Muleng 8.3
20. Central Gombi Konan Yaji – Mijiwana –
Gilanbara – Amdur
15.1
21. Central Hong Hong – Mijili – Kuvagaya 25.8
22. Central Hong Wuro Bokki – Uding – Pella 9.0
23. Central Yola Shagari lowcost – Bole tuki
road
25
24. Northern Michika Karza – Karasudi 1.2
25. Northern Mubi South Mubi (Lamurde) – Girji –
Bajaule
10.0
26. Northern Mubi South Ribawo junction – Muchala 5.0
27. Northern Maiha Humbutudi – Kilange – Mbalagi 14.2
28. Northern Maiha Mayo Ngule – Manjeken –
Salama
6.0
29. Central Girei Mararaba junction – Daware 4.0
TOTAL 361.7Km
35
ANNEX 2: PEOPLE MET DURING THE STUDY
S/No Name Location/Phone Number
1 Eng. Umar Abdullahi Yola 08036945402
2 Dr Sani Shalanguwa Yola 07065811140
3 Hajiya Farida Yola 08039551056
4 Ahmadu Shetiman Muninga Muninga/08089671228
5 Lawan Filingo Village Head of Filingo/09028669600
6 Wilson Baba Maijimilla Glanbara/07017428482
7 Ahmadu Adu Hassan Maijimillan Muleng Baraden Song/08033392183
8 Ardo Abubakar Mbalagi Mbalagi 08085681825
9 Ardo Edison Kola kusu Ardo Uding Pela/ 07069576968
10 Alhaji Nasiru Adama Former Administrator (DA) Kuva gaya 07085211611
11 Mr Ayuba Youth Leader Muchala 07068115222
12 Alhaji Mohammed Adamu District Head Fali Muchala 09059317025
13 Eng. Zubairu RAMP2 Procurement Officer 07037814707
36
ANNEX 3: MINUTES OF MEETINGS
RURAL ACCESS AND MOBILITY PROJECT (RAMP 2) IN ADAMAWA STATE
Minutes of Meeting
Meeting with Project Affected Persons (PAP) in Loko Community
Date: 7th February, 2019
Venue: Loko Village Head’s residence
Time: 10:00AM
Participants:12 persons from the community
AGENDA
Spoke: The consultants and Adamawa RAMP social safeguard officer led the meeting with the community
leadership and PAPs on the effect of the project in the community and what role the community is
expected to play.
i. PAPs were informed on the effect of the project on their properties and what action will be taken.
The affected properties have been identified and marked. The effective cut-off date for each
property was the day it was marked. Hence, all structures erected after markings will not be
considered for compensation.
ii. The team also informed the stakeholders on how their properties were valuated by the team, and
what compensation they should expect on the affected properties.
iii. The compensation to be made could be through cash or replacement of affected property,
depending on context.
After the briefing by the team leader on the PAPs and the modalities for valuation and compensation of
affected properties, comments and questions were raised by some of the participants:
i. Majority of the participant spoke in favour of the project and expressed readiness of the
community membership to participate.
Response: The RAMP team appreciated the gesture and assured the participants that the
project will be executed.
ii. Majority of the participant spoke in favour of cash payment rather than replacement of the
affected property in terms of compensation.
Response: The consultant explained to them that going by the Bank policy, lost land should be
compensated by another land of same or equivalent value and productivity. However, where
land is not available, and for other structures, compensation will be fully and timely considering
the choice of the affected person.
iii. Participants wanted to know if actually compensation will take into cognisance persons that will
be relocating to areas that are economically less favourable than where they currently occupy?
Response: Whatever property affected will be fully Compensated to its equivalent or even better
status.
The meeting lasted for about two hours, and the event ended at about 12:00PM
37
RURAL ACCESS AND MOBILITY PROJECT (RAMP 2) IN ADAMAWA STATE
Minutes of Meeting Meeting with Project Affected Persons (PAP) in Gan Na’i Community
Date: 22/02/2019
Venue: Gang Na’i Village Head’s residence (Alh. Jauro Yunusa)
Time: 2:00PM
Participants: 12 persons from the community
AGENDA
Spoke: The consultants and Adamawa RAMP social safeguard officer the meeting with the PAPs in the
presence of their leader Alh. Jauro Yunusa (Jauro Gang Na’i) and other community members on the effect
of the project in the community and what role the community is expected to play.
i. PAPs were informed on the effect of the project on their properties and what action will be taken.
The affected properties have been identified and marked. The effective cut-off date for each
property was the day it was marked. Hence, all structures erected after markings will not be
considered for compensation.
ii. The team also informed the stakeholders on how their properties were valuated by the team, and
what compensation they should expect on the affected properties.
iii. Consents of the affected persons were sought on the execution of the project on their properties.
After the briefing by the team leader on the PAPs and the modalities for valuation and compensation of
affected properties, comments and questions were raised by some of the participants:
iv. The community leadership have shown readiness to participate in the project, and have sought
to know when the project will commence in earnest?
Response: The project is feasible will be carried out in the community as soon as all the processes
are completed.
v. The participants sought to know from the team if the community will be informed in good time
before the project commences.
Response: PAPs will be given due notice before projects will be executed.
vi. Participants wanted to know if actually compensation will be paid on their properties, and when
should they expect it?
Response: Compensations will duly be paid to affected persons before the project execution.
The meeting lasted for about two hours, and the event ended at about 3:45PM
38
RURAL ACCESS AND MOBILITY PROJECT (RAMP 2) IN ADAMAWA STATE
Meeting with Project Affected Persons (PAP) in Bakta Community
Date: 3rd March, 2019
Venue: Bakta Village Head’s residence
Participants:13 persons from the community
Minutes of Meeting
S/N Item Highlights/Discussion Points Recommendations
1 Opening Meeting commenced at 10:30am
Introduction Self-introduction by all the participants
2 Opening
remarks
➢ The RAMP 2 team leadership briefed the stakeholders on the purpose of the visit with respect to the PAPs in the community.
➢ PAPs were informed on the effect of the project on their properties and what action will be taken.
➢ The affected properties have been identified and marked. The effective cut-off date for each property was the day it was marked. Hence, all structures erected after markings will not be considered for compensation.
➢ The team also informed the stakeholders on how their properties were valuated by the team, and what compensation they should expect on the affected properties.
➢ Consents of the affected persons were sought on the execution of the project on their properties.
39
2 Questions from
the participants
➢ How true/feasible is the road construction project in the community?
➢ What assurance do they have that their properties will duly be compensated?
➢ Will they be compensated before the project starts, or till after it has been executed?
➢ What if they were made to relocate to another place were their businesses will not thrive, hence, making them more vulnerable?
The project is feasible will
be carried out.
Compensations will duly
be paid to affected
persons as captured in the
assessment.
Compensations will duly
be paid to affected
persons before the project
execution.
Whatever property
affected will be fully
Compensated to its
equivalent or even better
status.
3 Closing ➢ At 12:45 pm
40
RURAL ACCESS AND MOBILITY PROJECT (RAMP 2) IN ADAMAWA STATE
Meeting with Project Affected Persons (PAP) in Muchala Community
Date: 6th March, 2019
Venue: District Head of Fali Muchala residence (Alh. Mohammed Adamu)
Participants: 12 persons from the community
Minutes of Meeting
S/N Item Highlights/Discussion Points Recommendations
1 Opening Meeting commenced at 10:30am
Introduction Self-introduction by all the participants
2 Opening remarks
➢ The RAMP 2 team leadership briefed the stakeholders on the purpose of the visit with respect to the PAPs in the community.
➢ The District head of the community gave an opening remark by welcoming the team. He also informed the team on the community’s readiness to participate in the project.
➢ The RAMP 2 team leadership informed the on the effect of the project on their properties and what action will be taken to ensure that their problems/concerns were addressed.
➢ The team also informed the stakeholders on how their properties were valuated by the team, and what compensation they should expect on the affected properties.
➢ The affected properties have been identified and marked. The effective cut-off date for each property was the day it was marked. Hence, all structures erected after markings will not be considered for compensation.
41
2 Questions from the participants
➢ When will the project begin and will the community be given due notice before then?
➢ Who will be directly responsible for giving the
PAPs compensation?
➢ Will they be compensated before the project starts, or till after it has been executed?
PAPs were assured that adequate notice will be given to them before the project commences. The State RAMP office will be in charge of the compensation. Compensations will duly be paid to affected persons before the project execution.
3 Closing ➢ At 12:45 pm
42
ANNEX 4: PAPS MEETING ATTENDANCE
43
44
45
46
ANNEX 5: LIST OF PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS (PAPS) ALONG THE ROADS CORRIDORS
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
1
Lawwali Usman 08120436124
Male 36 Married
Dalwa
N09.581
70
E
012.0259
9
ALT
246M
Tempora
ry shed
extensio
n, for
motorcyc
le
repairs’
25,000 25,000 Loss of shed
2
Babayo
Garba
0802684
2026
Male 36 Married
Dalwa
N09.581
32
E
012.0300
5
ALT
243M
Tempora
ry
Extensio
n
25,000 25,000 Loss of shed
3
Hamisu Yusufu 07019168931
Male 28 Single
Dalwa
N09.581
32
E
012.0300
5
ALT
243M
Tempora
ry
extensio
n
25,000 25,000 Loss of shed
47
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
4
Murtala Sule 08085387494
Male 38 Married
N0176530 E1103590 Alt 337M
Extension made of blocks and zinc, cemented 55,000 55,000
Loss of shed
5
Sunday Ike 08068005641
Male 44 Married
N0176530 E1103590 Alt 337M
Temporary Extension made of wood and Zinc to be removed 25,000 25,000
Loss of shed
6
Gambo Usman 08081318323
Male 26 Single
N0176530 E1103590 Alt 337M
Temporary Shed made of corn stalk and wood for selling fuel 18,000 18,000
Loss of shed
7
Yusha’u Usman 07083580058
Male 42 Married
N0176530 E1103590 Alt 337M
Temporary extension made of wood and zinc to be removed 25,000 25,000
Loss of shed
48
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
8
Abdulmumin Ali no phone number
Male 39 Married
N0176530 E1103590 Alt 337M
Temporary she made of wood and zinc for selling suya (Meat) 58,000 58,000
Loss of business premises
9
Musa Hashimu 09012465034
Male 57 Married
N0176530 E1103590 Alt 337M
House fence made of corn stalk, a kitchen made of mud and thatch & one baobab tree 85,000 135,000 220.000
Loss of privacy
10
Lawandi Hussaini 07014391751
Male 49 Married
N0176530 E1103590 Alt 337M
Temporary extension made of wood and zinc 25,000 25,000
Loss of shed
11
Idi Hussaini No Phone number
Male 34 Married
N0176530 E1103590 Alt 337M
Temporary extension made of wood and zinc 25,000 25,000
Loss of shed
49
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
12
Rabiu Saleh 08080805562
Male 29 Married
N0176530 E1103590 Alt 337M
Temporary extension made of wood and zinc 25,000 25, 000 Loss
13
Mallam Yahaya Haruna 07081422239
Male 43 Married
N0176530 E1103590 Alt 337M
Temporary stalk shed, a vulnerable person 25,000 25,000
Loss of shed
14
Public infrastructure
N09.505
74
E012.102
72
ALT285 M
Temporary market stalls to be removed 200,000 200,000
Loss of market
15
Abdullahi
Hamajuld
e
08065359137
Male 43 Married
Ndikong N 09.1019.6 E 012.1138.0 Alt. 197m CH 11 +100 0.08ha 70,000 70.000
Loss of land
50
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
16
Umar Ibo
07084600805
Male 39 Married
Ndikong N 09.1019.6 E 012.1138.0 Alt. 197m 0.08 ha 70,000 70,000
Loss of land
17
Patricia
Dominic
No Phone
Female 42 Married
N Ndikong N 09.1019.6 E 012.1138.0 Alt. 197m CH 11 +100
0.08haSmall portion 70,000 70,000
Loss of land
18
Obadiah
Saleh
No Phone
Male 67 Married
Ndikong N 09.1019.6 E 012.1138.0 Alt. 197m CH 11 +100 0.08ha 70,000 70,000
Loss of land
51
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
19
Martha
Obadiah
No Phone
Female 29 Married
Ndikong N 09.1019.6 E 012.1138.0 Alt. 197m CH 11 +100 0.08ha 70,000 70,000
Loss of land
20
Phillip
Abdullahi
08108812676
Male 42 Married
Ndikong N 09.1019.6 E 012.1138.0 Alt. 197m CH 11 +100 0.08ha 70,000 70,000
Loss of land
21
Zakariya
Dandoka
08147185384
Mal 46 Married
Ndikong N 09.1019.6 E 012.1138.0 Alt. 197m CH 11 +100 0.08ha 70,000 70,000
Loss of land
52
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
22
Abdullahi
Sule
No Phone
Male 52 Married
Ndikong N 09.1019.6 E 012.1138.0 Alt. 197m CH 11 +100 0.08ha 70,000 70,000
Loss of land
23
Ayuba D.
Doka
08147153250
Male 54 Married
Ndikong N 09.1019.6 E 012.1138.0 Alt. 197m CH 11 +100
0.08haSmall portion 70,000 70,000
Loss of land
24
Village Head of Dampakare
Dampaka
re
N08.540
85
E012.052
647
ALT419
Uncompleted mud Mosque and a Neem tree 145,000 145,000
Loss worshiping place
25
Hussaini Musa 08122433555
Male 45 Married
Mararab
a Gang
Baksi
N08.450
90
One Shea Butter tree 150,000 150,000
Loss of Tree
53
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
E 012.
05561
ALT, 405M
26
Halidu Joda 07015427092
Male 37 Married
Gang Na’I
N08.450
78
E012.052
90
ALT404M
Temporary shed made of wood and thatch for selling fuel 25,000 25,000
Loss of Business Shed
27
Hassan Joda 09079261986
Male 35 Married
Gang Na’I
N08.450
78
E012.052
90
ALT404M
Temporary located metal drum kiln for selling meat 25,000 25,000
Loss of Business Shed
28
Safiya Jidda 09076323522
Female 35 Married
Gang Na’I
N08.450
78
E012.052
90
ALT404M
Temporary stand for frying beans cake 10,000 10.000
Loss of Business
29
Yunusa Bello 09023541542
Male 60 Married
Gang Na’I
N08.451
04
E012.052
83
ALT405M
Baobab tree to be removed 135,000 135,000
Loss of Tree
54
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
30
Usman Jibo No Phone
Male 51 Married
Tasau
N08.464
13
E012.043
80
ALT405M
Neem Tree to be removed 40,000 40,000
Loss of Tree
31
Haruna Usman Maishayi 08143987313
Male 46 Married
Metani
N8.1268
3755
E12.0122
4635
Alt 520M
Temporary, shed made of wood and zinc
Neem Tree to be removed 25,000 40,000 65,000
Loss of Tree
32
Saidu Isa 08063007832
Male 38 Married
Kiri
Timbura
N8.1462
6644
E11.9495
6886
ALT
592M
Wall made of mud 16 m to be removed 250,000 250,000
Loss of fence
33
Ahmadu Sanda 07065290125
Male 45 Married
Kiri
Timbura
N8.1462
6644
E11.9495
6886
ALT 592M
Temporary Tea shop made of Thatch 35,000 35,000
Loss of Business Shed
55
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
34
Benedict Labai Maiunguwa Kiri 08031324954
Not Appli- cable
Kiri
Timbura
N8.1461
3432
E11.9513
7559
ALT
589M
Community Borehole to be relocated 500,000 500,000
Loss of source of water
35
Benedict Labai Maiunguwa Kiri 08031324954
Not Appli- cable
Kiri
Timbura
N8.1461
3432
E11.9513
7559
ALT
589M
Electric pole to be relocated 100,000 100,000
Temporary loss of light
36
Yunusa Saidu 08100692560
Male 39 Married
Kiri
Timbura
N8.1465
1388
E11.9518
7526
ALT
584M
Neem Tree to be removed 40,000 40,000
Loss of Tree
37
Gambo Mohammed Daksami (comm.Rep.) 08167551017
Daksami
N8.4707
3576
E11.9455
9430
ALT
553M
two
temporar
y sheds
to be
removed
A tree 30,000 25,000 55,000 Loss of Tree
56
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
38
Gambo Mohammed Daksami (comm.Rep.) 08167551017
Daksami
N8.4707
3576
E11.9455
9430
ALT
553M
Broken Block wall for market and 21 temporary wooden and thatch roof Market shed to be removed 850,000 850,000
Temporary effect on marketing
39
Owner not available. Gambo Mohammed Daksami (comm.Rep.) 0816755101
Daksami
N8.4707
3576
E11.9455
9430
ALT
553M
Temporary tailoring shed made of wood and thatch to be removed 20,000 20,000
Temporary loss of business
40
Gambo Mohammed Daksami (comm rep) 08167551017
Daksami
N8.4688
9340
E11.9446
5471
ALT
557M
Slaughter
slap to be
removed
200,000 200,000
57
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
41
Mohammed Sanwe Dalam
Male 30 Married
Daksami N8.46710057 E11.94418080 ALT 565M
To cut one Banana Tree and farm fence made of corn stalk to be shifted inward 75,000 75,000
42 Isa Adamu
Male 32 Married
Daksami N8.46710057 E11.94418080 ALT 565M
To cut one Mango Tree and farm fence made of corn stalk to be shifted inward 125,000 125,000
43
NEPA AUTHORITY
Chikito N9.24222000 E12.87453667 Alt198m
Gurin-FilingoElectric Pole to be shifted Appropriate authority to be contacted
75,000 75,000
Temporary loss of light
58
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
44
NEPA AUTHORITY
Chikito N9.24095667 E12.87454833 Alt203m
Gurin-FilingoElectric Pole to be shifted Appropriate authority to be contacted
75,000 75,000
Temporary loss of light
45
NEPA AUTHORITY
Muninga N9.19586333 E12.87654667 Alt185m
Gurin-FilingoWire supporting the pole to be shifted, Appropriate authority to be contacted
75.000 75,000
Temporary loss of light
46
Mamman Sale 07085332777
Male 46 Married
Parda N09010.818 E012043.647 Alt 193 Or
House fence (25m )made of Thatch to be shifted 60,000 60,000
59
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
N0250281 E1015572 Alt 193
backward
47
Abdullahi Mannan No Phone
Male 68 Married
Parda N09010.817 E012043.656 Alt 191 Or N0250294 E1015573 Alt 191
House fence (25m) made of Thatch to be shifted backward (Vulnerable person)
130,000 130,000
48
Public Infrastructure
Parda N09010.818 E012043.678 Alt 194 Or N0250337 E1015572 Alt 194
Pole to be shifted backward
75,000 75,000
Temporary loss of light
49
Adamu Saidu No Phone
Male 57 Married
Parda N09010.824
House fence made of mud
160,000 160,000
60
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
E012043.607 Alt 195 Or N0250205 E1015591 Alt 195
(26M) to be removed
50 Mallan Jibrilla
Male 51 Married
Parda N09010.824 E012043.601 Alt 193 Or N0250179 E1015596 Alt 193
One room (4x6M) made of mud and Zinc roof to be demolish
140,000 140,000
Temporary loss of business
51
Salihu Garba 08106641593
Male 50 Married
Loko
N09.461
3.2
E012.350
7.1
ALT.248M
Tempora
ry Shed
made of
wood
and zinc
for
selling
fabrics 25,000 25,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
61
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
52
Lawal Zubairu 07036750826
Male 48 Married
Loko
N09.461
3.2
E012.350
7.1
ALT.248
M
Wooden
Table for
selling
groundn
ut.
35,000 35,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
53
Alhassan Ali 09065072631
Male 49 Married
Loko
N09.461
3.2
E012.350
7.1
ALT.248
M
Long
Wooden
Table
and shed
made of
wood
and
thatch
selling
watermel
on.
45,000 45,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
54 Yusuf Alhassan
Male 56 Married
Loko N09.4613.2 E012.3507.1 ALT.248M
Ground
spread
mat for
selling
Sweet
melon. 10,000 10.000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
55
Alh Abdullahi Korau 08130319975
Male 53 Married
Loko
N09.461
3.2
E012.350
7.1
2 big (12x
12m)
temporar
y store
and shed
for 265,000 265,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
62
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
ALT.248
M
selling
minerals
.
56
Mohammed Zulkifilu 08140526179
Male 31 Married
Loko
N09.461
3.2
E012.350
7.1
ALT.248
M
Wooden
Table,
selling
Kolanuts.
10,000 10,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
57
Yahaya Yahuza 08147891707
Male 27 Married
Loko
N09.461
3.2
E012.350
7.1
ALT.248
M
Tempora
ry shop
made of
wood
and Zinc
65,000 65,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
58
Dada Ali No Phone number
Male 50 Married
Loko
N09.461
3.2
E012.350
7.1
ALT.248
M
Tempora
ry shop
made of
wood
and Zinc
65,000 65,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
59 LGA authority
Loko
N09.461
3.2
E012.350
7.1
ALT.248
M
50,000 50,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
63
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
60
Nafiu Namadi 07038628311
Male 35 Married
Loko
N09.461
3.2
E012.350
7.1
ALT.248
M
Tempora
ry shed
made of
wood
and
Thatch
(extensio
n), for
selling
tea.. 35,000 35,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
61
Samaila Maishayi 08107317425
Male 35 Married
Loko
N09.461
3.2
E012.350
7.1
ALT.248
M
Tempora
ry shed
made of
wood
and
Thatch
(extensio
n), for
selling
tea. 35,000
35,000
Temporary loss of business
62
Titus
Muazu
Male 51 Married
Amdur
N
10.17859
1
E
12.54744
7
Alt. 559m
Mud
house
Thatched
roof 8 x7
m to be
removed
75,000 75,000
64
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
63
Mubi
South
Mubi(La
murde)-
Girji-
Bajaule
XXX
308410E
1132578
N &
308503E,
1132500
N
Three
structure
s mud
building
and zinc
roof to
be
removed
that are
too close
to the
road.
720,000
720,000
64
Lainus John 0808521167
Muchala
N10.35831171 E13.37728161 ALT 606M
Tempora
ry
Snooker
spot
made of
zinc. 190,000 190,000
Temporary loss of business
65
Marshal Ignatius 07058879678
Male 35 Married
Muchala N10.35842500 E13.37715667 ALT 606M
Iron
Containe
r shop
with
extended
Zinc
veranda. 60,000 60,000
Temporary loss of business
66
Christopher Steven 07017153842
Male 26 Married
Muchala
N10.358
29167
E13.3771
7167
Tempora
ry Zinc
shop for
selling
mobile 40,000 40,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
65
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
ALT
605M
phones
and
accessori
es
67
Joshua Lalina 08107398250
Male 45 Married
Muchala
N10.358
41833
E13.3772
1833
ALT
609M
Tempora
ry Zinc
shop
40,000 40,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
68
Bitrus Augustine 08157159405
Male 27 married
Muchala
N10.358
57000
E13.3770
3500
ALT
606M
Tempora
ry Zinc
shop
with
extended
veranda
40,000 40,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
69
Andrew Emmanuel 07052090038
Male 48 married
Muchala
N10.359
03500
E13.3740
68833
ALT
603M
Welding
shop
with
temporar
y
extensio
n. The
extensio
n needs
to be
removed. 45,000 45,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
66
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
70
James
Felix
Male 26 single
Ribawo
Junction-
Muchala
N
10.35841
4
E
13.37715
7
Alt. 609m
,Tempor
ary shed
to be
removed
25,000 25,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
71
Mathias
Tumba
Male 28 married
Ribawo
Junction-
Muchala
N
10.35841
4
E
13.37715
7
Alt. 609m
Tempora
ry shed
to be
removed
25,000 25,000
Temporary loss of business
72
Joel
Joseph
Male 21 Single
N
10.35841
4
E
13.37715
7
Alt. 609m
Tempora
ry shed
to be
removed
25,000 25,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
67
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
73
Romanus
Male 23 Single
N
10.35841
4
E
13.37715
7
Alt. 609m
Tempora
ry shed
to be
removed
25,000 25,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
74
Michael
Dale
Male 20 Single
N
13.37747
2
E
10.35816
9
Alt. 611m
Tempora
ry shed
to be
removed
25.000 25,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
75
Isa Inuwa
Male 27 Single
N
13.37747
2
E
10.35816
9
Alt. 611m
Tempora
ry shed
to be
removed
50,000 50,000
Tempora
ry loss of
business
76
Ahmadu
Zubairu
0813408
2520
Male 65 Married
Manjeke
n
296624E,
1110793
N
ALT.506
M
One
room 6x
5M made
of mud
and Zinc
roof to
be 160,000 160,000
Loss of accomodation
68
S/No Name/Tel. No
Sex/Age/ Marital Status Picture
Location Coordinates Land (A)
Structure (B)
Crop /tree
Total A
Total B
Total C Total
Type of Acquisition
demolish
ed
Total for
PAPs
630,000 6,691,000 730,000
8,051,000