efficiency of issr and rapd markers in genetic divergence analysis and conservation management of...
TRANSCRIPT
1 23
Plant Systematics and Evolution ISSN 0378-2697Volume 300Number 6 Plant Syst Evol (2014) 300:1409-1420DOI 10.1007/s00606-013-0970-z
Efficiency of ISSR and RAPD markersin genetic divergence analysis andconservation management of Justiciaadhatoda L., a medicinal plant
Amit Kumar, Priyanka Mishra, SubhashChandra Singh & Velusamy Sundaresan
1 23
Your article is protected by copyright and
all rights are held exclusively by Springer-
Verlag Wien. This e-offprint is for personal
use only and shall not be self-archived
in electronic repositories. If you wish to
self-archive your article, please use the
accepted manuscript version for posting on
your own website. You may further deposit
the accepted manuscript version in any
repository, provided it is only made publicly
available 12 months after official publication
or later and provided acknowledgement is
given to the original source of publication
and a link is inserted to the published article
on Springer's website. The link must be
accompanied by the following text: "The final
publication is available at link.springer.com”.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Efficiency of ISSR and RAPD markers in genetic divergenceanalysis and conservation management of Justicia adhatoda L.,a medicinal plant
Amit Kumar • Priyanka Mishra •
Subhash Chandra Singh • Velusamy Sundaresan
Received: 29 May 2013 / Accepted: 15 December 2013 / Published online: 7 January 2014
� Springer-Verlag Wien 2014
Abstract Genetic variation within and among population
is the basis for survival of the population both in short and
long term. Thus, studying the plant genetic diversity is
essential for any conservation program. Indigenous
medicinal plants like Justicia adhatoda L. which are facing
high rate of depletion from the wild population need
immediate attention. DNA-based dominant molecular
marker techniques, random amplification of polymorphic
DNA (RAPD) and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR)
were used to unravel the genetic variability and relation-
ships across thirty-two wild accessions of J. adhatoda L., a
valuable medicinal shrub widespread throughout the trop-
ical regions of Southeast Asia. Amplification of genomic
DNA using 38 primers (18 RAPD and 20 ISSR) yielded
434 products, of which 404 products were polymorphic
revealing 93.11 % polymorphism. The average polymor-
phic information content value obtained with RAPD and
ISSR markers was 0.25 and 0.24, respectively. Marker
index (RAPD = 3.94; ISSR = 3.53) and resolving power
(RAPD = 4.24; ISSR = 3.94) indicate that the RAPD
markers were relatively more efficient than the ISSR assay
revealing the genetic diversity of J. adhatoda. The Shan-
non diversity index obtained with RAPD and ISSR markers
was 0.40 and 0.38, respectively. The similarity coefficient
ranged from 0.26 to 0.89, 0.33 to 0.93 and 0.31 to 0.90 with
RAPD, ISSR and combined UPGMA dendrogram,
respectively. PCA derived on the basis of pooled data of
both the markers illustrated that the first three principal
coordinate components accounted 79.27 % of the genetic
similarity variance. The mantel test between two Jaccard’s
similarity matrices gave r = 0.901, showing the fit corre-
lation between ISSR- and RAPD-based similarities. Based
on the results, ex-situ methods may be the most suitable
and efficient measure for long-term conservation.
Keywords Justicia adhatoda � Conservation
implication � Genetic variability � Molecular markers �Marker parameters
Introduction
The use of plant-derived products in disease management
is an important breakthrough in the history of humankind.
The use of plants as medicines is as old as human civili-
zation itself and out of about 258,650 species of higher
plants reported from the world; more than 10 % are used to
cure ailing communities (Shinwari 2010). Justicia adhat-
oda L. (Synonym Adhatoda vasica Nees), belonging to the
family Acanthaceae, is a highly valuable medicinal shrub
grows wild along the roadside and railway tracks where the
availability of water is low, throughout the tropical regions
of Southeast Asia (Chakrabarty and Brantner 2001). Jus-
ticia adhatoda commonly known as Vasaka or Malabar nut
in India is a perennial, evergreen, gregarious, stiff and
highly branched shrub (1.0–2.5 m height) with bitter taste
(Patel and Venkata-Krishna-Bhatt 1984). Justicia adhatoda
leaves have been used extensively in Ayurvedic and Unani
Medicine primarily for respiratory disorders and used
locally for the last 2000 years in India (Atal 1980). The
A. Kumar � P. Mishra � V. Sundaresan (&)
Department of Plant Biology and Systematics, CSIR, Central
Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Research Centre
(CIMAP), Bangalore 560065, India
e-mail: [email protected]
S. C. Singh
Department of Taxonomy and Pharmacognosy, CSIR, Central
Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (CIMAP),
Lucknow 226015, India
123
Plant Syst Evol (2014) 300:1409–1420
DOI 10.1007/s00606-013-0970-z
Author's personal copy
respiratory benefits of vasaka are linked to the abundance
of quinazoline alkaloids in the plant’s leaves. Studies show
that these alkaloids viz. vasicine, vasicinone, vasicinol,
adhatodine, adhatonine, adhvasinone, anisotine and hy-
droxypeganine in the leaves contribute to the observed
medicinal properties of the plant.
The primary goal of conservation is to ensure potential
survival of the population both in short and in long term
which is achieved by the population through possible
adaptation to environmental changes indicated by the level
of genetic variation present in the population (Ellstrand and
Elam 1993; Frankel et al. 1995; Zaghloul et al. 2013).
Assessment of the level and distribution of genetic diver-
sity within species may not only contribute to knowledge
of their evolutionary history and potential, but is also
critical to their conservation and management (Hamrick
and Godt 1996; Li and Ge 2006). The level of genetic
diversity within a given species and its populations
depends on the breeding system, past level of gene flow
among populations, the actual sizes of populations, geo-
graphic distributions, isolation, historical events, and
human impact (Loveless and Hamrick 1984; Hamrick and
Godt 1989).
Investigation on population genetic diversity using
various molecular markers is of great importance for the
genetic resource characterization, protection and sustain-
able utilization of important medicinal plants (Munoz et al.
2010; Sundaram and Purwar 2011). Applying DNA
molecular markers, for assessment of genetic variation in
plants has shown advantages over other markers based on
the phenotype; they are neutral, not related to age and
tissue type, not influenced by the environmental conditions,
feasibility, lower costs and more informative than mor-
phological markers (Marshall 1997). Random amplified
polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter-simple sequence
repeat (ISSR) are two of the most popular markers based
on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been widely used
in population genetic studies to characterize genetic
divergence within and among the populations or species of
various medicinal plants (Tripathi et al. 2012; Singh et al.
2011; Guo et al. 2006). The selection of RAPD and ISSR
was based on their relative technical simplicity, level of
polymorphism they detect, cost effectiveness, easily
applicable to any plant species and target those sequences
which are abundant throughout the eukaryotic genome and
are rapidly evolved. The RAPD technique, has been com-
monly employed technique shown to be advantageous over
morphologic and chemical markers, provides an unlimited
number of rapid inheritable genetic markers independent of
environmental effects, which can be used for genetic
diversity analysis (Ince et al. 2010; Williams et al. 1990)
and breeding purposes (Raina et al. 2001). Recent studies
indicated that ISSR could be able to produce more reliable
and reproducible bands because of the high annealing
temperature, longer sequence of ISSR primers and unlike
SSR markers, no prior knowledge of target sequences is
required for ISSR (Zietkiewicz et al. 1994; Kiani et al.
2012).
For establishing conservation programs it is important to
estimate genetic diversity of a species because the level of
genetic variability, a species contains, responds adaptively
to environmental changes (Qian et al. 2001). The survival
index of a species is greatly determined by the percentage
of polymorphism and the gene flow between the popula-
tions. Large-scale demands of high medicinal value leaves
for ayurvedic formulations and local use for fuel have
fragmented the populations of J. adhatoda (Gilani et al.
2011). Apart from the genetic diversity studies of Justicia
adhatoda using PBA (P450-based analog) markers (Gilani
et al. 2011), the information on the genetic diversity of
J. adhatoda is completely lacking. The present study was
undertaken with the aims of predicting the genetic diversity
of the populations of J. adhatoda; assessing the role and
efficiency of molecular markers in revealing genetic vari-
ation within and among populations using ISSR and
RAPD; and providing basic information for future biodi-
versity conservation and management programs of this
important medicinal species.
Materials and methods
Collection of plant materials
Thirty-two accessions of J. adhatoda collected from dif-
ferent geographical regions ranging from 150 to 5,000 ft
altitude in northern parts of India (Fig. 1; Table 1). All the
accessions are deposited in the herbarium at CSIR-Central
Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow
(26�530N; 80�580E), Uttar Pradesh, India.
Isolation, quantification and electrophoresis of genomic
DNA
Genomic DNA was isolated from the leaves of accessions
that were listed in Table 1, by adopting the procedure
outlined by Khanuja et al. (1999) with necessary modifi-
cation. Leaves (3 g) were ground to a fine powder in liquid
nitrogen and extracted with hot CTAB (Cetyl Tri-methy-
lammonium Bromide) extraction buffer [100 mM Tris–Cl
(pH 8.0), 25 mM EDTA (ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid),
1.5 M NaCl, 2.5 % CTAB, 0.2 % v/v b-mercaptoethanol
and 2 % w/v PVP (Polyvinylpyrrolidone)]. The mixture
was incubated at 65 �C for 90 min followed by extraction
with chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1). Isopropanol was
used to precipitate nucleic acid and washed with 80 %
1410 A. Kumar et al.
123
Author's personal copy
ethanol. The pellets were dissolved in high salt TE buffer
(1 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris–Cl (pH 8.0) and 1 mM EDTA).
The purity of genomic DNA isolated was quantified both
spectrometrically (Nano Drop, ND-1000, Nanodrop Tech-
nologies Wilmington, Delaware, USA) by measuring
absorbance at 260 nm and visualized under UV light after
electrophoresis on 0.8 % agarose gel. Stock DNA was
diluted to make a working solution of 25 ng/ll.
PCR Amplification
A set of 40 ISSR primers procured from the University of
British Columbia (UBC set No. 9), and 30 RAPD primers
procured from Operon Technologies Inc (USA) was
screened for their repeatable amplification. 20 ISSR and 18
RAPD Primers which produced good bands and amplifi-
cation profile were selected. For each primer, 25 ll ampli-
fication reaction contained 19 Taq DNA polymerase buffer
(with MgCl2) (GeNeiTM), 50 ng of genomic DNA, 1U of
Taq DNA polymerase (GeNeiTM), dNTP 200 lM each
(dATP: dTTP: dCTP: dGTP in 1:1:1:1 parts) (GeNeiTM)
and 0.5 lM primer. Amplifications were carried out using a
DNA thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Bio-Rad) by
optimizing the protocol, with the following parameters:
initial denaturation for 5 min at 94 �C followed by 45
cycles, denaturation of 1 min at 94 �C, annealing of 1 min
at 36 �C for RAPD and at 48–60 �C for ISSR, extension at
72 �C for 2 min, with final extension at 72 �C for 7 min.
Amplified PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis
on 1.2 % agarose gel in 1.0 % tris–acetate EDTA buffer
stained with 0.001 % EtBr using a Minipack-250 electro-
phoresis system (GeNeiTM) at 50 V. A double-digested kDNA (EcoRI and HindIII) and 2-Log DNA ladder were
used to assess the size of DNA bands. Gel photographs were
taken by means of Box EF2 (Syngene Pvt. Ltd.) gel docu-
mentation system supported by Gene Sys software.
Statistical analysis
Reproducible ISSR and RAPD products were manually
scored for band presence (1) or absence (0) for each
accession and a binary qualitative data matrix was con-
structed. Initially, the potential of both the markers for
estimating genetic variability of J. adhatoda was examined
by measuring the marker informativeness through the
counting of bands. Primer banding characteristics such as
number of total bands (TB), number of polymorphic bands
(PB) and percentage of polymorphic bands (PPB) were
obtained. To analyze the suitability of both the markers to
evaluate genetic profiles of J. adhatoda, the performance of
the markers was measured using three parameters: poly-
morphic information content (PIC), marker index (MI) and
resolving power (RP). The PIC value for each locus was
calculated using formula (Roldan-Ruiz et al. 2000);
PICi = 2fi (1 - fi), Where PICi is the polymorphic infor-
mation content of the locus i, fi is the frequency of the
amplified fragments and 1 - fi is the frequency of non-
amplified fragments. The frequency was calculated as the
Fig. 1 Geographic map showing the collection sites of 32 accessions of Justicia adhatoda. Numbers indicate the collection site as listed in Table 1
Efficiency of ISSR and RAPD markers in genetic divergence analysis 1411
123
Author's personal copy
ratio between the number of amplified fragments at each
locus and the total number of accessions (excluding miss-
ing data). The PIC of each primer was calculated using the
average PIC value from all loci of each primer. Effective
multiplex ratio was calculated using formula; EMR
(effective multiplex ratio) = n 9 b, where n is the average
number of fragments amplified by accession to a specific
system marker (multiplex ratio) and b is estimated from the
number of polymorphic loci (PB) and the number of non-
polymorphic loci (MB); b = PB/(PB ? MB). Marker
index for both the markers was calculated to characterize
the capacity of each primer to detect polymorphic loci
among the genotypes. Marker index for each primers was
calculated as a product of polymorphic information content
and effective multiplex ratio (Varshney et al. 2007);
MI = EMR 9 PIC. The resolving power (RP) of each
primer was calculated as (Prevost and Wilkinson 1999);
RP = RIb, Where Ib represents the informative fragments.
The Ib can be represented on a scale of 0/1 by the fol-
lowing formula; Ib = 1 - (2 9 |0.5 - pi|), where pi is the
proportion of accessions containing the ith band.
The data matrix of both markers was then converted into
genetic similarity matrix using Jaccard coefficient (Jaccard
1908) in SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc.) and NTSYS-PC 2.02j
(Rohlf 1998). The genetic relatedness among the 32 indi-
viduals of three populations was analyzed using unweigh-
ted pair group method with arithmetic average (UPGMA)
based on pairwise Nei’s (1973) genetic distance. Bootstrap
analysis (Felsenstein 1985) using UPGMA search with
1,000 replicates was performed to obtain the confidence of
Table 1 Details of germplasm collected for genetic diversity analysis
S. no. Accession no. Place of collection State Latitude Longitude Altitude (feet)
1 12486 Kukrail forest (Lucknow) Uttar Pradesh N26�53043.000 E80�58056.000 402
2 12487 Allahabad Uttar Pradesh N25�24048.500 E81�50058.900 316
3 12488 Kaushambhi Uttar Pradesh N26�53039.400 E80�58059.400 393
4 11159 Mughalsarai Uttar Pradesh N25�16015.600 E83�07004.800 269
5 14561 Varanasi Uttar Pradesh N25�19045.600 E82�59015.300 248
6 11157 Gorakhpur Uttar Pradesh N26�44000.700 E83�21008.200 272
7 11158 Raebareli Uttar Pradesh N26�13051.800 E81�14026.300 366
8 12489 Haldwani Uttarakhand N29�12052.300 E79�32006.200 1410
9 12490 Almora Uttarakhand N29�35055.800 E79�40014.800 5240
10 12491 Someshwar Uttarakhand N29�47028.100 E79�36009.700 4640
11 12492 Kathgodam Uttarakhand N29�16002.100 E79�32046.900 1703
12 12493 Bhimtal Uttarakhand N29�18042.400 E79�33031.800 2937
13 12494 Pantnagar Uttarakhand N29�01056.000 E79�28035.600 686
14 12495 Bhawali Uttarakhand N29�27040.800 E79�31039.300 5258
15 12496 Kaushani Uttarakhand N29�50023.400 E79�35047.900 5318
16 12497 Lalkuan Uttarakhand N29�04038.900 E79�31001.400 815
17 11160 Buxar Bihar N25�33010.800 E83�58011.400 203
18 11164 Hilsa Bihar N25�20026.300 E85�17042.500 148
19 11161 Ara Bihar N25�33001.400 E84�40014.100 213
20 11155 CIMAP-I (Lucknow) Uttar Pradesh N26�53036.400 E80�58051.700 384
21 11156 CIMAP-II (Lucknow) Uttar Pradesh N26�53036.400 E80�58044.800 396
22 12498 Bareilly Uttar Pradesh N28�19056.600 E79�24041.500 566
23 7000 Patna Bihar N25�34038.800 E85�04049.600 171
24 12485 Barabanki Uttar Pradesh N26�54000.600 E81�06009.200 405
25 12499 Mirzapur Uttar Pradesh N29�04038.900 E79�31001.400 815
26 12500 Kanpur Uttar Pradesh N26�29050.900 E80�27033.400 388
27 11151 Fatehpur Uttar Pradesh N25�55035.600 E80�49027.200 381
28 11152 Jhansi Uttar Pradesh N25�27048.900 E78�37014.400 728
29 11153 Unchahar Uttar Pradesh N25�55002.400 E81�17039.500 369
30 11154 Faizabad Uttar Pradesh N26�46014.200 E82�08030.400 332
31 11162 Pratapgarh Uttar Pradesh N25�53029.600 E81�55016.200 308
32 11163 Kannauj Uttar Pradesh N27�02088.500 E79�54034.000 458
1412 A. Kumar et al.
123
Author's personal copy
the tree using the software Treecon (Van De Peer and
Wachter 1994). The data matrix was used to determine the
genetic diversity, genetic differentiation and gene flow
using the software POPGENE (Yeh et al. 1999) ver. 1.32.
Population differentiation was analyzed for polymorphism
between populations by Gst. Indirect estimation of the
amount of gene flow between populations was made from
Gst values (Nei 1987) using the formula; Nm = 0.5 (1 -
Gst)/Gst (McDermott and McDonald 1993), where Nm is the
number of migrants per generation. Analysis of molecular
variance (AMOVA) (Excoffier et al. 1992) was used to
calculate variation among and within population using
GenAlEx (Peakall and Smouse 2006) ver. 6.41. Further,
principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to
highlight the resolving power of the ordination based on
similarity coefficient of data realized from RAPD and ISSR
average similarity indices using SPSS statistics 17.0 soft-
ware (SPSS Inc.). Mantel test (Mantel 1967) was per-
formed using 10,000 permutations carried out in
XLSTAT�-Pro (Version 7.5, 2004, Addinsoft Inc.,
Brooklyn, NY, USA); the significance level was set at
a = 0.05, to compute the matrix correlation (r) between
the similarity matrices generated from different assays to
test the goodness of fit between RAPD and ISSR markers.
Results
RAPD Profiling
Out of 30 RAPD primers tested, 18 primers (Table 2) of
10 bp produce clear and reproducible band. The number of
products generated by these decamer RAPD primers was
found to range from 7 to 16 with primer OPT 06, OPT 18,
OPJ 01 giving the maximum (16) and primer OPT 09, OPT
15 giving the minimum number of amplicon (7). A total of
208 products produced in different size ranging from 150
to 2,500 bp out of which 196 (94.2 %) products were
polymorphic and 12 (5.8 %) products were monomorphic.
The percentage of polymorphism ranged from 80 % for
OPT 05 to 100 % for OPT 01, OPT 02, OPT 04 (Fig. 2),
OPT 09, OPT 12, OPT 16, OPT 17, OPT 18 and OPT 19
with an average of 94.2 % polymorphism per primer. To
determine PIC values of each primer, the mean of PIC
values is analyzed for all loci. High PIC value of 0.36 (OPT
01) and low PIC value of 0.13 (OPT 05), with an average
value of PIC per primer 0.25 were obtained. The effective
multiplex ratio depends on the fraction of polymorphic
fragments (b). In this study, the highest effective multiplex
ratio (EMR) 20.42 was observed with the primer OPT 04
and the lowest effective multiplex ratio (EMR) 9.68 was
observed with the primer OPT 05 with an average EMR of
15.09 per primer. To determine the general usefulness of
the system of markers used, the MI (marker index) for each
RAPD primer was calculated. The highest MI was
observed with the primer OPT 04 (6.89) and lowest in the
primer OPT 05 (1.34), with an average MI of 3.94 per
primer was obtained. The resolving power (RP) is a
parameter that indicates the discriminatory potential of the
primers chosen. The highest RP value was observed with
the primer OPT 18 (7.37) and the lowest with the primer
OPT 15 (1.75) with an average RP of 4.24 per primer
(Table 2). The Nei’s gene diversity (h) and Shannon index
(I) among all the populations were estimated as 0.25
(SD = 0.14) and 0.40 (SD = 0.19), respectively. Mean
coefficient of gene differentiation (Gst) value 0.30 indicated
a high level of population differentiation while estimate of
gene flow (Nm) in the population was found as 1.28
(Table 4). Of the total genetic diversity, AMOVA analysis
revealed a very high 92.2 % variance occurred within
populations and 7.8 % variance occurred among popula-
tions with a high significance (P \ 0.001).
The similarity matrix developed using the NTSYS-PC
2.02j (Rohlf 1998) software showed that Jaccard’s simi-
larity index ranged from 0.26 to 0.89 with mean value of
0.63. The UPGMA algorithm was used for grouping all
accessions based on their genetic distances. Dendrograms
representing most probable genetic relationship between
accessions corresponding to RAPD are presented in Fig. 3.
Bootstrapping values represent percentage out of 1,000
replications, and demonstrated the reliability of tree
topology. It was observed that the accessions from three
different northern states of India were grouped into two
major clusters. Cluster I has 26 accessions, all from the
plain region. Cluster-II has six accessions comprising five
accessions from hilly regions and one from lower hilly area
of Uttarakhand. Cluster I again sub clusters into four
clusters with few outliers. Subcluster Ia comprised the
accessions from both Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. All the
accessions of subcluster Ib and subcluster Ic comprised
different places of Uttar Pradesh. Subcluster Id comprised
one accessions from Uttar Pradesh and three accessions
from lower hilly area of Uttarakhand (Fig. 3). The most
closely related genotypes were Mirzapur and Kanpur with
the highest similarity index (0.892) and the most distantly
related genotypes were Faizabad and Almora with the
lowest similarity index (0.263). PCA derived on the basis
of RAPD data illustrated that the first three principal
coordinate components accounted for 67.19, 8.41 and
4.31 % variation, respectively.
ISSR profiling
The initial screening of the ISSR primers for clear and
repeatable band profiles showed that out of 40 primers
screened, 20 primers (Table 3) of 15–18 bp, of which all of
Efficiency of ISSR and RAPD markers in genetic divergence analysis 1413
123
Author's personal copy
them were anchored at 30 end for increased specificity
yielded amplification products. The number of products
generated by these arbitrary primers was found to range
from 8 to 17 of different sizes ranging from 150 to
3,500 bp. The primer UBC 844 gave the maximum (17)
and primer UBC 810, UBC 823, UBC 834 giving the
minimum number of amplicon (8). These twenty primers
generated a total of 226 products with an average of 11.3
products per primer, of which 208 (92.0 %) products with
an average of 10.4 products per primer were polymorphic
and 18 (8 %) products were monomorphic. The percentage
of polymorphism ranged from 80 % for primers UBC 809
and UBC 825 to 100 % for primers UBC 807, UBC 828,
UBC 835, UBC 844, UBC 845 and UBC 848 with an
average of 92 % polymorphism per primer. In this study,
high PIC value of 0.36 for primer UBC 845 and low PIC
value of 0.17 for primer UBC 866 and UBC 881, with an
average value of PIC per primer 0.24 was obtained. The
highest effective multiplex ratio (EMR) 17.73 was
observed with the primer UBC 862 and the lowest 9.29 was
observed with the primer UBC 823 with an average EMR
of 14.39 per primer. The highest MI was observed with the
primer UBC 845 (6.09) and lowest in the primer UBC 881
(2.06) with an average MI of 3.53 per primer was obtained,
while the highest RP value was observed with the primer
UBC 843 (8.56) and the lowest with the primer UBC 855
(1.93) with an average RP of 3.94 per primer was obtained
(Fig. 4; Table 3). The Nei’s gene diversity (h) and Shannon
Table 2 Marker parameters calculated for each RAPD primer used with Justicia adhatoda
S. no. Primer T (�C) TB PB MB PPB (%) PIC EMR MI RP
1 OPT 01 36 12 12 0 100 0.36 14.50 5.24 6.37
2 OPT 02 36 13 13 0 100 0.25 13.69 3.55 4.62
3 OPT 03 36 9 8 1 88.88 0.23 17.67 4.17 3.06
4 OPT 04 36 14 14 0 100 0.33 20.42 6.89 7.12
5 OPT 05 36 10 8 2 80 0.13 9.68 1.34 1.81
6 OPT 06 36 16 15 1 93.75 0.24 11.30 2.77 5.43
7 OPT 08 36 11 10 1 90.90 0.21 11.81 2.54 3.06
8 OPT 09 36 7 7 0 100 0.28 15.00 4.20 2.56
9 OPT 12 36 13 13 0 100 0.25 17.84 4.49 4.37
10 OPT 13 36 10 9 1 90 0.25 16.38 4.17 3.12
11 OPT 14 36 10 9 1 90 0.21 10.71 2.32 2.81
12 OPT 15 36 7 6 1 85.71 0.18 16.65 3.04 1.75
13 OPT 16 36 14 14 0 100 0.30 15.78 4.79 5.68
14 OPT 17 36 8 8 0 100 0.22 19.12 4.33 2.56
15 OPT 18 36 16 16 0 100 0.30 15.75 4.82 7.37
16 OPT 19 36 11 11 0 100 0.28 16.63 4.67 4.06
17 OPT 20 36 11 9 2 81.81 0.26 15.84 4.22 4.31
18 OPJ 01 36 16 14 2 87.5 0.26 12.96 3.42 6.31
Total 208 196 12
Avg./primer 11.55 10.88 0.66 94.23 0.25 15.09 3.94 4.24
T (�C) annealing temperature, TB total band, PB polymorphic band, MB monomorphic band, PPB (%) percentage polymorphic band (%), PIC
polymorphic information content, EMR effective multiplex ratio, MI marker index, RP resolving power of primer
Fig. 2 RAPD profile of different genotypes of Justicia adhatoda produced with primer OPT 04. Lane M is 2-log DNA ladder and lanes 1–32
represent different J. adhatoda genotypes as listed in Table 1
1414 A. Kumar et al.
123
Author's personal copy
Table 3 Marker parameters calculated for each ISSR primer used with Justicia adhatoda
S. no. Primer T (�C) TB PB MB PPB (%) PIC EMR MI RP
1 UBC 807 52 10 10 0 100 0.32 15.90 5.24 4.81
2 UBC 809 60 10 8 2 80.0 0.19 14.24 2.80 3.00
3 UBC 810 52 8 7 1 87.5 0.21 15.75 3.36 2.12
4 UBC 823 54 8 7 1 87.5 0.25 9.29 2.34 3.18
5 UBC 825 60 10 8 2 80.0 0.18 17.68 3.22 2.18
6 UBC 826 52.5 10 9 1 90.0 0.18 15.75 2.96 2.56
7 UBC 828 52 10 10 0 100 0.24 16.40 3.98 3.25
8 UBC 834 52.5 8 7 1 87.5 0.29 10.06 3.01 3.87
9 UBC 835 52 15 15 0 100 0.22 13.46 2.97 4.25
10 UBC 841 52 12 11 1 91.7 0.27 16.34 4.41 4.37
11 UBC 843 53 15 14 1 93.3 0.35 15.12 5.43 8.56
12 UBC 844 54 17 17 0 100 0.27 12.58 3.43 6.75
13 UBC 845 53 12 12 0 100 0.36 16.91 6.09 7.06
14 UBC 848 52.5 10 10 0 100 0.32 15.00 4.86 4.87
15 UBC 855 53 9 8 1 88.9 0.18 11.95 2.19 1.93
16 UBC 856 53 16 15 1 93.7 0.21 11.89 2.53 4.31
17 UBC 862 57.2 10 9 1 90.0 0.18 17.73 3.29 2.43
18 UBC 866 57.2 14 12 2 85.7 0.17 14.75 2.58 3.06
19 UBC 876 48 10 9 1 90.0 0.25 15.39 3.92 3.43
20 UBC 881 58.7 12 10 2 83.3 0.17 11.59 2.06 2.81
Total 226 208 18
Avg./primer 11.3 10.4 92.0 0.24 14.39 3.53 3.94
T (�C) annealing temperature, TB total band, PB polymorphic band, MB monomorphic band, PPB (%) percentage polymorphic band (%), PIC
polymorphic information content, EMR effective multiplex ratio, MI marker index, RP resolving power of primer
Fig. 3 Dendrogram of Justicia
adhatoda based on genetic
distance obtained from RAPD
markers using the UPGMA
method. Numbers on branches
correspond to bootstrap values
(1,000 replications)
Efficiency of ISSR and RAPD markers in genetic divergence analysis 1415
123
Author's personal copy
index (I) among all the populations were estimated as 0.24
(SD = 0.15) and 0.38 (SD = 0.20), respectively. Mean
coefficient of gene differentiation (Gst) value 0.31 indicated
a high level of population differentiation, while estimate of
gene flow (Nm) in the population was found as 1.30
(Table 4). AMOVA analysis revealed a very high 91.7 %
variance occurred within populations and 8.3 % variance
occurred among populations with a high significant
(P \ 0.001). Jaccard’s similarity index ranged from 0.33
(Mirzapur and Almora) to 0.94 (Patna and Buxar) with
mean value of 0.66 suggesting high level of genetic vari-
ability in the species. The dendrogram obtained from ISSR
profiles showed two major clusters (Fig. 5), placing
twenty-six accessions from plain region in first and the rest
in the second cluster. Cluster I again sub clusters into four
clusters with few outliers. All the accessions of subcluster
Ia and subcluster Ic comprised different places of Uttar
Pradesh. Subcluster Ib comprised the accessions from both
Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. Subcluster Id comprised three
accessions from lower hilly area of Uttarakhand. PCA
derived on the basis of ISSR data illustrated that the first
three principal coordinate components accounted for 68.59,
5.84 and 4.37 % variation, respectively.
Combined data analysis for RAPD and ISSR
The DNA fingerprinting methods used in this study
revealed polymorphism independent of each other from
different genomic regions. The RAPD profiles usually
represent widely distributed portions of the genome, while
the ISSR profiles are generated from microsatellite-rich
regions of the genome. Thus, these methods involve
regions having substantially different evolutionary histo-
ries and have different genome coverage (Verma and
Rana 2013). In the present analysis, a total of 38 primers
were considered resulted in 434 fragments, of which 404
were polymorphic revealing 93.11 % polymorphism
across all the accessions of J. adhatoda. The mean PIC
value, MI value and RP value observed for all the 38
primers were 0.25, 3.73 and 4.09, respectively. The
minimum genetic distance (0.31) among the accessions
was observed between Faizabad and Almora, whereas the
maximum genetic distance (0.90) was observed between
Patna and Ara based on the cumulative data for both
molecular marker used in the study. The dendrogram
based on the pooled data clearly showed that all the
accessions grouped into two major clusters (Fig. 6). PCA
(Fig. 7) derived on the basis of pooled data of both the
molecular markers illustrated that the first three principal
coordinate components accounted for 68.82, 6.54 and
3.91 % variation, respectively, accounted for 79.27 % of
the genetic similarity variance. Estimates of matrix cor-
relation coefficient (r) value between the genetic distances
were highest (r = 0.901) for RAPD versus ISSR (Fig. 8).
These values revealed that RAPD and ISSR data have
good correlation, and are best fit to each other.
Discussion
J. adhatoda is depleting from the wild population due to its
uses in indigenous medicines, so that information on
genetic structure and the diversity of populations are
essential for their conservational program. Life history
traits like reproductive mode, seed dispersal mechanism,
Fig. 4 ISSR patterns of Justicia adhatoda generated by primer UBC 844. Lane M is double-digested k DNA (EcoRI and HindIII) DNA ladder
and lanes 1–32 represent different Justicia adhatoda genotypes as listed in Table 1
Table 4 Summary of various genetic diversity indices analyzed in
Justicia adhatoda populations
S.
no.
Mean value with RAPD
(std. deviation)
Diversity
indices
Mean value with ISSR
(std. deviation)
1 1.93 (0.17) Na 1.91 (0.23)
2 1.40 (0.30) Ne 1.39 (0.31)
3 0.25 (0.14) h 0.24 (0.15)
4 0.40 (0.19) I 0.38 (0.20)
5 0.26 (0.02) Ht 0.25 (0.02)
6 0.18 (0.01) Hs 0.17 (0.01)
7 0.30 Gst 0.31
8 1.28 Nm 1.30
Na observed number of alleles, Ne expected number of alleles, h Nei’s
gene diversity, I Shannon’s information index of genetic diversity, Ht
heterozygosity, Hs average heterozygosity, Gst degree of genetic
differentiation, Nm estimate of gene flow
1416 A. Kumar et al.
123
Author's personal copy
and geographic range have greatest influence on the levels
and distribution of genetic diversity of plant species.
Generally, geographically widespread species tend to
maintain more genetic diversity than species with small
geographical ranges (Hamrick and Godt 1996). In the
present study, it is observed that genetic diversity within
population at high altitude was greater than that of popu-
lations at lower altitude. Studies show that genetic varia-
tions occurred along elevation gradients because
topographical heterogeneity of alpine plants habitat causes
Fig. 6 Dendrogram of Justicia
adhatoda based on genetic
distance obtained from
cumulative data using the
UPGMA method. Numbers on
branches correspond to
bootstrap values (1,000
replications)
Fig. 5 Dendrogram of Justicia
adhatoda based on genetic
distance obtained from ISSR
markers using the UPGMA
method. Numbers on branches
correspond to bootstrap values
(1,000 replications)
Efficiency of ISSR and RAPD markers in genetic divergence analysis 1417
123
Author's personal copy
substantial changes in the environment (Ohsawa and Ide
2008; Byars et al. 2009). It is also reported that at different
altitudes a strong isolation of populations may be occurred
because of drastic differences in phenology between higher
and lower altitudes and mountain barriers which restricts
the gene flow between the populations resulting in complex
and varied genetic variations (Arnaud-Haond et al. 2006;
Liu et al. 2012) which is supported by this study revealing
high genetic diversity in the accessions from hilly region of
Uttarakhand compared to the accessions from plain region
of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. In general, outcrossing species
have higher levels of genetic diversity than selfing and
clonal plants (Rossetto et al. 1995). J. adhatoda is self
incompatible, and a very high level of geitonogamy is
found in this species. Two species of carpenter bees, Xy-
locopa verticalis and Xylocopa sp. are reported as the
effective pollinators (Shivanna 2009). The pollination
system is expected to play a major role in determining
plant reproductive success in the face of environmental
variation, and shaping its pattern of genetic diversity.
Nearby populations of J. adhatoda that are pollinated by
bees may share many alleles because genes can flow easily
between sites, leading to such species genetically similar.
The result of the present study using RAPD and ISSR
markers revealed high level of genetic diversity with an
average Nei’s genetic diversity were estimated as 0.25 and
0.24, respectively, which were very slightly higher than
for, dicotyledons (0.165), long-lived perennial plants
(0.180), widespread (0.183) (Hamrick and Godt 1996)
when compared to outcrossing nature of J. adhatoda.
The Gst value of 0.31 for both RAPD and ISSR indicated
that the majority of variation is found within populations
and minimum among populations. AMOVA analysis with a
high significance (P \ 0.001) showed that a very higher
proportion of the genetic variation resided within popula-
tions (RAPD = 92.2 %; ISSR = 91.7 %), and a very lower
degree of genetic variation resulted from differentiation
among populations (RAPD = 7.8 %; ISSR = 8.3 %).
Similar result was also reported using PBA (P450-based
analog) molecular marker in J. adhatoda (Gilani et al.
2011). A value of estimate gene flow Nm \ 1, Nm [ 1 and
Nm [ 4 classified as low, moderate and extensive gene
flow, respectively. The value obtained for Nm (estimate
gene flow) based on the mean Gst (Nm = 1.28 for RAPD;
Nm = 1.30 for ISSR) indicates moderate gene flow among
these wild populations of J. adhatoda (since Nm [ 1, i.e.,
Fig. 7 Two-dimensional plots
obtained using principal
component analysis based on
cumulative data of RAPD and
ISSR
Fig. 8 Mantel test showing correlation between RAPD and ISSR
marker
1418 A. Kumar et al.
123
Author's personal copy
more than one migrant per generation into a population).
Even a moderate rate of gene flow among populations (one
individual every a few generations) can ‘‘link’’ the gene
pools of two populations. The present study on the wild
populations of J. adhatoda revealed a high level of genetic
variation at the species level, with RAPD = 94.2 %;
ISSR = 92.0 % of loci being polymorphic, with [70 %
polymorphism. Results indicated the presence of wide
genetic variability among different genotypes of the plant.
The present amplification revealed polymorphism inde-
pendent of each other from different genomic regions. The
RAPD profiles usually represent widely distributed portions
of the genome, while the ISSR profiles are generated from
microsatellite-rich regions of the genome. Cluster analysis
based on all the three DNA marker profiles broadly grouped
all the 32 accessions into two clusters. Clustering of isolates
remained more or less the same in RAPD, ISSR and com-
bined data of RAPD and ISSR. Dendrograms show clear
pattern of clustering according to the locations from where
germplasms were collected. Population of Uttar Pradesh
and Bihar are clustered into one because of close geo-
graphic proximity or may be due to similar climatic con-
ditions. The correlation between Jaccard’s similarity values
obtained from different marker techniques was high
(r = 0.901). This indicates the fit correlation in between
ISSR- and RAPD-based similarities.
The molecular genetic tools used in this study were
compared for their efficiency to generate polymorphism
across the accessions of J. adhatoda. Both techniques were
informative with regard to the amount of polymorphism
detected. However, on the basis of higher PIC values
(RAPD = 0.25; ISSR = 0.24), Shannon diversity index
(RAPD = 0.40; ISSR = 0.38), percent polymorphism
(RAPD = 94.2; ISSR = 92.0), marker index (RAPD =
3.94; ISSR = 3.53), and resolving power (RAPD = 4.24;
ISSR = 3.94), the RAPD markers were marginally more
informative than ISSR in the assessment of genetic diver-
sity in J. adhatoda. The similar results are reported in
Caldesia grandis (Chen et al. 2006), Dalbergia sissoo (Arif
et al. 2009). This may be because of the fact that two
marker techniques targeted different portions of the gen-
ome. It also revealed the use of both RAPD and ISSR
markers in the genetic diversity studies for further con-
servation program.
Because of its valuable medicinal properties and high
demand, Justicia adhatoda needs more attention toward the
conservation. As the plant is widely used in traditional and
Ayurvedic systems of medicine in India, an ex-situ con-
servation program seems to be the most suitable and effi-
cient measure for long-term conservation. Understanding
population structure of J. adhatoda will provide critical
base-line information for developing sustainable manage-
ment strategies. In the present study, molecular variances
for within population were more than among population,
which implied the need to conserve more individuals in any
population. In addition, it would be wise to save popula-
tions in different regions to limit population decline caused
by large-scale environmental catastrophes.
Acknowledgments The authors wish to express their sincere thanks
to Director, CSIR-CIMAP (Lucknow), for providing the facilities to
carry out this research. The financial support from the Council of
Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India through
the projects (XIIth FYP) ChemBiO (BSC-0203) and BioprosPR
(BSC-0106) is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Arif M, Zaidi NW, Singh YP, Haq QMR, Singh US (2009) A
comparative analysis of ISSR and RAPD markers for study of
genetic diversity in Shisham (Dalbergia sissoo). Plant Mol Biol
Rep 27:488–495
Arnaud-Haond S, Teixeira S, Massa S, Billot C, Saenger P, Coupland
G, Duarte C, Serrao E (2006) Genetic structure at range edge:
low diversity and high inbreeding in Southeast Asian mangrove
(Avicennia marina) populations. Mol Ecol 15:3515–3525
Atal CK (1980) Chemistry and pharmacology of vasicine: a new
oxytocin and abortifacient. Indian Drugs 15:15–18
Byars SG, Parsons Y, Hoffmann AA (2009) Effect of altitude on the
genetic structure of an Alpine grass, Poa hiemata. Ann Bot
103:885–899
Chakrabarty A, Brantner AH (2001) Study of alkaloids from
Adhatoda vasica Nees on their anti-inflammatory activity.
Phytother Res 15:532–534
Chen JM, Gituru WR, Wang YH, Wang QF (2006) The extent of
clonality and genetic diversity in the rare Caldesia grandis
(Alismataceae): comparative results for RAPD and ISSR mark-
ers. Aquat Bot 84:301–307
Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of
small population size. Implications for plant conservation. Ann
Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242
Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular
variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes:
applications to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data.
Genetics 131:479–491
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach
using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791
Frankel OH, Brown AHD, Burdon JJ (1995) The conservation of
plant biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gilani SA, Fujii Y, Kikuchi A, Shinwari ZK, Watanabe KN (2011)
Ecological consequences, genetic and chemical variations in
fragmented populations of a medicinal plant, Justicia adhatoda
and implication for its conservation. Pak J Bot 43:29–37
Guo WL, Gong L, Ding ZF, Li YD, Li FX, Zhao SP, Liu B (2006)
Genomic instability in phenotypically normal regenerants of
medicinal plant Codonopsis lanceolata Benth. Et Hook. f., as
revealed by ISSR and RAPD markers. Plant Cell Rep
25:896–906
Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1989) Allozyme diversity in plant species.
In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS (eds) Plant
population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources 43–63.
Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts
Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic
diversity in plant species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol
Sci 351:1291–1298
Efficiency of ISSR and RAPD markers in genetic divergence analysis 1419
123
Author's personal copy
Ince AG, Karaca M, Onus AN (2010) Genetic relationships within
and between Capsicum species. Biochem Genet 48:83–95
Jaccard P (1908) Nouvelle recherches sur La distribution florale. Bull
Soc Vaud Sci Nat 44:223–270
Khanuja SPS, Shasany AK, Darokar MP, Kumar S (1999) Rapid
isolation of DNA from dry and fresh samples of plants producing
large amounts of secondary metabolites and essential oils. Plant
Mol Bio Rep 17:1–7
Kiani M, Memariani F, Zarghami H (2012) Molecular analysis of
species of Tulipa L. from Iran based on ISSR markers. Plant Syst
Evol. doi:10.1007/s00606-012-0654-0
Li A, Ge S (2006) Genetic variation and conservation of Changnienia
amoena, an endangered orchid endemic to China. Plant Syst
Evol 258:251–260
Liu YF, Xing M, Zhao W, Fan RJ, Luo S, Chen X (2012) Genetic
diversity analysis of Rhododendron aureum Georgi (Ericaceae)
located on Changbai Mountain using ISSR and RAPD markers.
Plant Syst Evol 298:921–930
Loveless MD, Hamrick JL (1984) Ecological determinants of genetic
structure in plant populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:65–95
Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized
regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220
Marshall DF (1997) Meeting training needs in developing countries.
In: Ayad WG, Hodgkin T, Jaradat A, Rao VR (eds) Molecular
genetic techniques for plant genetic resource. IPGRI, Rome,
pp 128–132
McDermott JM, McDonald BA (1993) Gene flow in plant pathosys-
tems. Annu Rev Phytopathol 31:353–373
Munoz M, Warner J, Albertazzi FJ (2010) Genetic diversity analysis
of the endangered slipper orchid Phragmipedium longifolium in
Costa Rica. Plant Syst Evol 290:217–223
Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.
Proc Nat Acad Sci 70:3321–3323
Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University
Press, New York, pp 176–187
Ohsawa T, Ide Y (2008) Global patterns of genetic variation in plant
species along vertical and horizontal gradients on mountains.
Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:152–163
Patel VK, Venkata-Krishna- Bhatt H (1984) In vitro study of
antimicrobial activity of Adhatoda vasica (L.) (Leaf extract) on
gingival inflammation-A preliminary report. Ind J Med Sci
38:70–72
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in
Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research.
Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295
Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ (1999) A new system of comparing PCR
primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor
Appl Genetic 98:107–112
Qian W, Ge S, Hong DY (2001) Genetic variation within and among
populations of a wild rice Oryza granulata from China detected
by RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 102:440–449
Raina SN, Rani V, Kojima T, Ogihara Y, Singh KP, Devarumath RM
(2001) RAPD and ISSR fingerprints as useful genetic markers
for analysis of genetic diversity, varietal identification and
phylogenetic relationships in parent (Arachis hypogea) acces-
sions and wild species. Genome 44:763–772
Rohlf FJ (1998) NTSYS-PC: numerical taxonomy and multivariate
analysis system. Version 2.02, Exeter software. Setauket, New
York
Roldan-Ruiz I, Dendauw J, Vanbockstaele E, Depicker A, De Loose
M (2000) AFLP markers reveal high polymorphic rates in
ryegrasses (Lolium spp.). Mol Breed 6:125–134
Rossetto M, Weaver PK, Dixon KW (1995) Use of RAPD analysis in
devising conservation strategies for the rare and endangered
Grevillea scapigera (Proteaceae). Mol Eco 4:321–329
Shinwari ZK (2010) Medicinal plants research in Pakistan. J Med
Plant Res 4(3):161–176
Shivanna KR (2009) Pollination biology, breeding system and
reproductive success of Adhatoda vasica, an important medicinal
plant. Curr Sci 96(3):408–412
Singh DR, Srivastava AK, Srivastava A, Srivastava RC (2011)
Genetic diversity among three Morinda species using RAPD and
ISSR markers. Ind J Biotech 10:285–293
Sundaram S, Purwar S (2011) Assessment of genetic diversity among
fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.), using RAPD molec-
ular markers. J Med Plants Res 5(9):1543–1548
Tripathi N, Chouhan DS, Saini N, Tiwari S (2012) Assessment of
genetic variations among highly endangered medicinal plant
Bacopa monnieri (L.) from Central India using RAPD and ISSR
analysis. 3. Biotech 2:327–336
Van De Peer Y, Wachter R (1994) TREECON for Windows: a
software package for the construction and drawing of evolu-
tionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Comp
Appl Biosci 10:569–570
Varshney RK, Chabane K, Hendre PS, Aggarwal RK, Graner A
(2007) Comparative assessment of EST-SSR, EST-SNP and
AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conser-
vation of genetic resources using wild, cultivated and elite
barleys. Plant Sci 173:638–649
Verma S, Rana TS (2013) Genetic relationships among wild and
cultivated accessions of curry leaf plant (Murraya koenigii (L.)
Spreng.), as revealed by DNA fingerprinting methods. Mol
Biotechnol 53:139–149
Williams LGK, Kubelik AR, Levak KJ et al (1990) DNA polymor-
phism amplification by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic
markers. Nuc Acid Res 18:641–646
Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TBJ, Ye ZH, Mao JX (1999) POPGENE
3.2, User-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis.
http://ualberta.ca/wfeyeh
Zaghloul M, Reisch C, Poschlod P (2013) Soil seed bank contributes
significantly to genetic variation of Hypericum sinaicum in a
changing environment. Plant Syst Evol. doi:10.1007/s00606-
013-0837-3
Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D (1994) Genome fingerprinting
by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain
reaction amplification. Genomics 20:176–183
1420 A. Kumar et al.
123
Author's personal copy