-364 slidematerial 2perpg
TRANSCRIPT
1
93-364: Materials Recovery/ Waste Management
Course Overview
Instructor: Rajesh SethOffice: CEI Rm 3077Email: [email protected]
2
Course Description
Characterization and analysis of municipal solid waste systems
Waste reduction, reuse, and recycling. Materials recovery. Managing, collecting and transporting solid wastes
Waste reclamation and disposal methods
Waste management policies, regulations and facility siting issues
Textbooks
Solid Waste Engineering. Vesilind/ Worrell/ Reinhart. Brooks/Cole, 2002. ISBN 0-534-37814-5
Supplemental Texts:Integrated Solid Waste Management. G. Tchobanoglous, H. Theisen. S. Vigil. McGraw-Hill, 1993. ISBN 0-07-063237-5
3
Grading Scheme
Tutorial Assignments 25%
Mid-Term Exam 30% (Week of Feb 8, 2016)
Final Exam 45% (As scheduled)
Grading Scheme
Assignment submission: Assignments are due the day of submission by
4:30 pm. Assignments submitted late will be assessed the
following penalties: 24 hours late: - 10% 48 hours late: - 25% >48 hours late: assignment not accepted /
instructor’s discretion.
4
Course Content
Introduction to waste management Waste quantities and characteristics Classification of waste and waste properties Overview of hazardous and industrial wastes Policy, legislation, and regulations Waste diversion, recovery, and recycling Materials separation and recovery facilities Materials recovery theories and processes Collection and transportation Facility siting Landfill Site closure Long-term management
Today’s Introduction
Overview and History
From Medieval Europe to Today
Human history of waste production how to solve the problem?
Functional Elements of Municipal Solid Waste Management
What is needed to manage our waste?
Differs from community to community
Differs from developed to developing countries waste quantity/type
5
What is a Solid Waste? Most human activities leave behind some kind of
waste USEPA regulates all this waste under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Canada – under CEPA Categories
Hazardous - waste with properties that make it dangerous or potentially harmful to human health or the environment Mostly industrial sources
Non-hazardous - wastes and materials are not specifically hazardous Have opportunities for reduction, reuse, and recycling Most municipal solid waste under this category
Solid waste generation in the U.S. (1992). Units are billions of tons (U.S.) per year
Solid Waste Generation
Though MSW is a small fraction, most of the other wastes arealso generated to satisfy our materials society demands
6
Materials Processing
Minerals society demands – enormous aesthetic, environmental, economic and energy problems
MSW Generation Rates - US
USEPA, 2011Figure 1. MSW Generation Rates, 1960-2010
7
MSW Recycling Rates - US
USEPA, 2011
Figure 2. MSW Recycling Rates, 1960-2010
Ontario Facts
Source: Association of Municipalities of Ontario
8
Ontario Facts
Canadians generate more waste per capita than anyone else in the developed world
Each person in Ontario produces 920 kg of waste per year, or 2.5 kilograms every day
That adds up to 12 million tonnes of waste in Ontario every year
Source: Association of Municipalities of Ontario
Ontario Facts
Ontario’s landfills are filling up. Since 1989, 649 of Ontario’s 730 landfills have closed
With only 81 landfills left, we must choose to recycle more or create more landfills or incinerators
Only 24 per cent of Ontario’s waste is being diverted from landfills. Almost 80 per cent of waste is disposed
35 per cent of Ontario’s garbage is shipped to the U.S.
It takes about a generation, a willing community and a lot of tax dollars to build even one new landfill
Source: Association of Municipalities of Ontario
9
Ontario Facts
The total cost of managing Ontario’s waste in 2009 was over $1 billion
Of that, producers contributed $133 million for programs such as blue box, household hazardous waste and electronics stewardship programs
In 2008, municipalities spent $21 million just to manage closed landfills – because while it may seem cheap to bury waste today, you keep paying tomorrow and well into the future
Source: Association of Municipalities of Ontario
How Solid Waste Management came about?
10
Industrial Revolution to Today
Settlements increased dramatically 1790 2 cities 1840 131 cities 1920 2722 cities 2007 100+ cities w/ over 3 M population
Increase waste due to increased density Rapid urban growth
Leads to CROWDING Insufficient sanitary system and non regular
waste disposal
Toronto’s garbage issues
http://www.toronto.ca/garbage/index.htm
11
Development and density…
http://www.ban.org/photogallery/china_guiyu/pages/ childon_garbage_pic.html
Functional Elements of Solid Waste Management
12
Functional Elements of Solid Waste Management
?
Functional Elements of Solid Waste Management
1. Waste Generation2. Waste Handling and Separation3. Collection4. Separation, processing and
transformation5. Transfer and transport6. Disposal
13
Integrated Waste Management System
All functional elements have been evaluated for use
All interfaces between elements have been matched for effectiveness and economy.
Community developed Integrated Waste Management system
Fun Facts
Each ton of recycled paper can save: 17 trees 380 gallons of oil Three cubic yards of landfill space 4,000 kilowatts of energy 7,000 gallons of water!
14
Integrated Solid Waste Management
Background
Serious effort towards proper solid waste management only in the last three decades
Range of social, political and technical issues – illustrated by NIMBY, NIMET
Present policies emphasize waste reduction and recycling (Pollution Prevention or P2)
Unavoidable disposal heading towards Incineration (with/without energy recovery) Carefully engineered and managed landfills
15
Legislation & Regulation
1899 Rivers & Harbors Act Prohibited dumping of large objects into navigable
waterways
Federal govt not involved
Municipal waste thrown into large open dumps
1965 Solid Waste Disposal Act First federal legislation
Emphasis on more efficient methods of disposal not protection of public health
Legislation & Regulation (contd.)
1970 National Environmental Policy Act Creation of USEPA
Introduction of environmental impact statements
1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) with 1984 Amendment Primarily to deal with hazardous waste
Included guidelines for non-hazardous waste
Minimal national criteria for landfills established Installation of composite liner system mandated
16
Materials Flow
Materials Flow Through Society
Materials Flow
Closed system. At steady state,A (raw materials) = B (materials returned to the environment)
Large A and B – good for employment Large A and B detrimental effects on the environment Depletion of resources
Reducing A or B concomitantly reduces the other
17
Reduced Materials Use & Waste Generation
Four Rs: Reduction
Reuse
Recycling
Recovery
Reduction
Can be achieved in three basic ways: Reducing the amount of material used per
product (without sacrificing the quality)
Increasing the lifetime of the product
Eliminating the need for the product
18
Pollution Prevention (P2)
Waste reduction in industry called pollution prevention Cost of treating waste can sometimes be more than
process modification that will reduce/ eliminate waste
Reduction of waste at household level is called waste reduction (sometimes referred to as source reduction) Level of participation typically low Strategies found to be useful
Disposal fees based on volume/ weight Public information programs
Waste Reduction
“Shop Smart” Strategy by one municipality
19
Reuse
Reuse product or part for alternate use – no reprocessing
Recycling
Process of recycling refers to material that can be segregated by owner and collected separately – for resource recovery
Egs. Paper
Steel
Aluminum
Plastic
Glass
20
Obstacles to Recycling
Location of wastes – secondary materials have to shipped to the market. Transport cost can be prohibitive
Low value of material Uncertainty of supply – may deter waste
processors Administrative and institutional constraints Unwillingness to pay for recycling programs Prohibitive land use ordinances
Recovery
Process in which refuse is collected without separation
Materials separated at a central materials recovery facility (MRF)
Most items not made of single material Most recovery operations employ pickers Common method of separation is size reduction and
separation Most difficult challenge is firm market for recovered
product