document resume ed 076 160 author biggar, ronald s ...acting study director. ronald s. biggar, jr.,...

188
ED 076 160 AUTHOR TITLE INSTITUTION REPORT NO PUB DATE NOTE AVAILABLE FROM DOCUMENT RESUME HE 004 148 Biggar, Ronald S.; Huckenpahler, James G. Resources for Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges, 1971. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. NSF-72-315 Sep 72 106p. Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Stock number 3800-00133, $1.25) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS Costs; *Educational Finance; Expenditures; *Higher Education; *Research; Research Projects; *Resource Allocations; *Science Activities; Science Programs ABSTRACT This report presents the results of the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Survey of Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges, 1971, dealing exclusively with the employment of scientific and engineering personnel and the financing of scientific activities in U.S. institutions of higher education. The survey was conducted by mail questionnaires sent to 2,198 universities and colleges that maintained science and engineering programs. Usable questionnaires were received from three-fourths of these institutions. The survey obtained employment figures for scientists and engineers, graduate students receiving stipends for part-time services as scientists, and science technicians, as of mid-January 1971. Current and capital expenditures for research, development, and instruction in the sciences and engineering were collected for academic year 1969-70. The statistics were analyzed by function, level of educational attainment, type of institution, field of science, geographic area, source of funds, cost item and type of research and development, as appropriate. Appendices include related material. (Author/MN

Upload: others

Post on 09-May-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

ED 076 160

AUTHORTITLE

INSTITUTIONREPORT NOPUB DATENOTEAVAILABLE FROM

DOCUMENT RESUME

HE 004 148

Biggar, Ronald S.; Huckenpahler, James G.Resources for Scientific Activities at Universitiesand Colleges, 1971.National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.NSF-72-315Sep 72106p.Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government PrintingOffice, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Stock number3800-00133, $1.25)

EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58DESCRIPTORS Costs; *Educational Finance; Expenditures; *Higher

Education; *Research; Research Projects; *ResourceAllocations; *Science Activities; Science Programs

ABSTRACTThis report presents the results of the National

Science Foundation's (NSF) Survey of Scientific Activities atUniversities and Colleges, 1971, dealing exclusively with theemployment of scientific and engineering personnel and the financingof scientific activities in U.S. institutions of higher education.The survey was conducted by mail questionnaires sent to 2,198universities and colleges that maintained science and engineeringprograms. Usable questionnaires were received from three-fourths ofthese institutions. The survey obtained employment figures forscientists and engineers, graduate students receiving stipends forpart-time services as scientists, and science technicians, as ofmid-January 1971. Current and capital expenditures for research,development, and instruction in the sciences and engineering werecollected for academic year 1969-70. The statistics were analyzed byfunction, level of educational attainment, type of institution, fieldof science, geographic area, source of funds, cost item and type ofresearch and development, as appropriate. Appendices include relatedmaterial. (Author/MN

Page 2: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

FILMED FROM BEST AVAILABLE COPY

ir45-11RESOURCES FuR SCIENTIFIC ACTIV1

UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGI

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.EDUCATION WELFAREOFFICE OF EDUCATION

THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO.OUCEO EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROMTHE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG.1NATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR MIN.IONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILYREPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EOU.CATION POSITION OR POLICY.

Page 3: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

FILMED IT-NA BEST AVAILABLE COPY

44allarOir

DES FOR SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AT1NIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES, 1971

SURVEYS OF SCIENCE RESOURCES SERIESNATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

NSF 72-315U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.

EDUCATION & WELFAREOFFICE OF EDUCATION

THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO.OUCEO EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROMTHE PERSON OR

ORGANIZATION ORIG-INATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILYREPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU-CATION POSITION OR POLICY

Page 4: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Related Publications

Title

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "Federal Support to Univer-

NSF No. Price

sities and Colleges Reaches S3.5 Billion in 1971" 72-316

A Price Index for Deflation of Academic R&D Expenditures 72-310 S0.25

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "Undergraduate Enrollmentsin Science and Engineering 71-42

Resources for Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges, 1969 70-16 S 125

Availability of Publications

Those publications marked with a price should be obtained directly from the Superintendentof Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. Where no price islisted, single copies tnay be obtained grath from the National Science Foundation, Washington,D.C. 20550.

(See inside of back cover for Other Science Resources Publications.)

Page 5: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Biggar, Ronald S. Jr., and Huckenpahler, James G.Resources for Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges, 1971Washington, D. C.National Science FoundationReport No. 72-3152 April 1973

Available from GPO Bookstore Stock Number 3800-00133

This report presents the results of NSF's Survey of ScientificActivities at Universities and Colleges, 1971, dealing exclusivelywith the employment of scientific and engineering personnel and thefinancing of scientific activities in U. S. institutions of highereducation. It ii: the fourth in a series of biennial surveys institutedin 1964. The survey obtained employment figures for scientists andengineers, graduate students receiving stipends for part-time servicesas scientists, and science technicians, as of mid-January 1971. Currentand capital expenditures for research, development, and instruction inthe sciences and engineering were collected for academic year 1969-70.The statistics were analyzed by function, level of education attainment,type of institution, field of science, geographic area, source of funds,cost item, and type of research and development, as appropriate. Separatedata is available for Federally Funded Research and Development Centers,administered by universities and colleges, and medical schools. The surveywas conducted by mail questionnaires sent to 2,198 universities andcolleges that maintained science and engineering programs. Usablequestionnaires were received from three-fourths of these institutions.Figures shown in the report, however, represent universe totals, sincethey include estimates for all nonrespondents.

Page 6: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

I

3

RESOURCES FOR SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES ATUNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES, 1971

SURVEYS OF SCIENCE RESOURCES SERIESNATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

NSF 72-315

For sole by the Superintendent of Documents,U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402

Price $1.25 domestic postpaid or $1 GPO BookstoreStock Number 3800-00133

Page 7: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

general notes

Statistics shown in this report may not add to totals or subtotals becauseof rounding.

All percentage changes in trend statistics represent compound annualrates.

Financial data relate to the academic year, while employment figuresrelate to January of the designated year. For example, 1970 expendituresrepresent academic year 1969-70 and 1971 manpower data represent em-ployment levels as of January 1971.

Data for current R&D expenditures include estimates for departmentalresearch and for other R&D costs for which most universities and collegesdo not maintain separate records.

'6.--.J1

ii

t

1

Page 8: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

FOREWORD

There has been much in the news of recent years regarding the financialplight in the Nation's universities and colleges. The rapid expansion in aca-demic science programs that occurred throughout the early and mid-sixtiesestablished continuing requirements for financing expensive science researchand instruction operations. There then followed a period in which academicinstitutions experienced a leveling off, and in some cases a decline, in sup-port from their traditional sources of revenue, both governmental and pri-vate. Although recent increases in the level of Federal and private supportare looked upon as hopeful signs of a reversal in this trend, many universityadministrators and public officials are adyocating ways of stabilizing the flowof funds, particularly Federal funds, to institutions of higher education in anattempt to prevent large and unpredictable future fluctuations.

This study is an integral part o': the NSF continuing progra-n of periodicsurveys designed to produce information on the scope and character of theNation's investment in science and technology. Under this program all majorsectors of the U.S. economy are covered, including industry, government,and independent nonprofit organizations. The present report gives specialattention to trends in the utilization of resources by field of science, type ofinstitution, and source of financing.

The National Science Foundation extends its appreciation to the officialsof universities and colleges who provided the information upon which thisreport is based.

September 1972

iii

H. Guyford SteverDirectorNational Science Foundation

Page 9: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

acknowledgments

This report was prepared in the Division of Science Resources Studiesunder the guidance of Kenneth Sanow, Head, Statistical Surveys and ReportsSection. The survey was conducted under the direction of the late JosephH. Schuster, Study Director, Universities and Nonprofit Institutions StudiesGroup. The report was prepared under the direction of William L. Stewart,Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation of the report.James G. Huckenpahler contributed to all aspects of the survey, includingwriting certain sections of the report. Joan Staudte provided the statisticalassistance required for the survey. Assistance in compiling the mailing listand other aspects of the survey by officials of the U.S. Office of Education isgratefully acknowledged.

iv

Page 10: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

CONTENTS

HIGHLIGHTS

INTRODUCTION

PART I. UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES

vi PART II. FEDERALLY FUNCENTERS AMAIN!

vii UNIVERSITY CON

SECTION 1. Scientific and Technical Personnel 1

Scientists and Engineers 1

Graduate Students 5Technician', 7

SECTION 2. Science Expenditures 8Financing of Scientific Activities 8Current R&D Expenditures 9Current Expenditures for Instruction 14Capital Expenditures 16

SECTION 1. Scientific anScientistsGraduateTechnicia ,

SECTION 2. Financing ofCurrent R

APPENDIXES:

A. Technical Notes and Ta

B. Statistical Tables Uni

C. Statistical Tables Me

D. Statistical Tables U,Research and Develop

E. Covering Letter and In

Page 11: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

vi PART II. FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTCENTERS ADMINISTERED BY UNIVERSITIES AND

vii UNIVERSITY CONSORTIA

'OLLEGES SECTION 1. Scientific and Technical Personnel 19Scientists and Engineers 19

'echnical Personnel I Graduate Students 20d Engineers I Technicians 20'dents 5

7 SECTION 2. Financing of Scientific Activities 21Current R&D Expenditures 21

Mures 8Scientific Activities 8 APPENDIXES:

) Expenditures 9enditures for Instruction 14 A. Technical Notes and Tables 23nditures 16

B. S6tistical Tables Universities and Colleges 26

C. Statistical Tables Medical Schools 61

D. Statistical Tables University-Administered Federally FundedResearch and Development Centers 73

E. Covering Letter and Instructions 86

v

Page 12: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

HIGHLIGHTS

Universities and colleges are experiencing significant shifts in the propor-tion of scientists and engineers primarily engaged in R&D performance incontrast to those employed as teachers (page 1).

In full-time-equivalent (FTE) terms, the employment of scientists inresearch and development declined 1 percent per year between 1969 and1971 compared with an annual growth of 6 percent from 1965-69(page 1).

In contrast, the growth rate of teaching staff remained relatively constantat about 10 percent per year throughout the period; consequently, R&Dscientists dropped from 26 percent of total staff in 1965 to 20 percent in1971 (page 1).

In FTE terms, graduate student employment increased 3 percent per yearfrom 1969-71 compared with a 10-percent annual growth during 1965-69.The increase of graduate students working On R&D projects fell from anannual rate of 8 percent in the 1965-69 period to 2 percent per year from1969-71 (page 5).

Compared with a 9-percent annual growth from 1965 to 1969, the num-ber of technicians employed by universities and colleges actually declinedsince 1969. The curtailment of technician employment represents aneffort by many universities to trim staff and programs for budgetarypurposes (page 7).

Science expenditures in 1970 totaled S7.9 billion; this increase of 6 per-cent per year (1 percent in constant dollars)' over the S7.0 billion total in1968 compares with a IS-percent annual growth for 1964-68 (page 8).

Constant dollar data shown throughout this report are based on computations using the GNYimplicit price deflator: the data represent estimates of price changes in science and engineeringactivities rather than precise indicators.

vi

Federal financing of research end (10increase per year (a 2-percent annu:1968-70 period. Recent data, howeto universities and colleges will shoefor fiscal years 1972 and 1973 (page

Private institutions, more severely :support than public institutions, itpercent per year from 1968-70, wl9-percent annual rate. Both types hleast 14 percent in the 1964-68 perio

Capital expenditures for scientificment dropped 5 percent per year dusharp rise (19 percent per year) bet'sible for the shift were budgetary redof Federal agencies; however, due tcapital expenditures funded from otla year (page 16).

For the first time since the inceptioschools allotted less than one-half texpenditures, reflecting the greatercreasing enrollments (page 65).

Nearly all of the 11,300 scientists aadministered FFRDC's in 1971 wornumber has remained virtually the sa

R&D expenditures in university-adnlion, in 1970, six times the S121annual percent growth from 1953however, growth has slowed to 3

Page 13: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Meant shifts in the propor-ged in R&D performance in)

Iployment of scientists inper year between 1969 and6 percent from 1965-69

-emained relatively constantperiod; consequently, R&Daff in 1965 to 20 percent in

increased 3 percent per yearival growth during 1965-69.

R&D projects fell from anI to 2 percent per year from

)m 1965 to 1969, the num-id colleges actually declinedemployment represents an

nd programs for budgetary

Ilion; this increase of 6 per-over the $7.0 billion total inwth for 1964-68 (page 8).

sed on computations using the GNPchanges in science and engineering

vi

Federal financing of research and development leveled off to a 3-percentincrease per year (a 2-percent annual decline in constant dollars) in the1968-70 period. Recent data, however, indicate that Federal obligationsto universities and colleges will show a somewhat higher rate of increasefor fiscal years 1972 and 1973 (page 10).

Private institutions, more severely affected by the slowdown in R&Dsupport than public institutions, increased science expenditures by 3percent per year from 1968-70, while public institutions maintained a9-percent annual rate. Both types had averaged an annual growth of atleast 14 percent in the 1964-68 period (page 12).

Capital expenditures for scientific and engineering facilities and equip-ment dropped 5 percent per year during 1968-70, after an extraordinarilysharp rise (19 percent per year) between 1964 and 1968. Largely respon-sible for the shift were budgetary reductions in facilities-granting programsof Federal agencies; however, due to the tightening economic situation.capital expenditures funded from other sources also declined by 4 percenta year (page 16).

For the first time since the inception of the current survey series, medicalschools allotted less than one-half their science budget to current R&Dexpenditures, reflecting the greater instructional outlays required by in-creasing enrollments (page 65).

Nearly all of the 11,300 scientists and engineers employed in university-administered FFRDC's in 1971 worked full time on R&D projects - thisnumber has remained virtually the same since 1965 (page 19).

- R&D expenditures in university-administered FFRDC's totaled S737 mil-lion, in 1970, six times the S121 million reported in 1953. The averageannual percent growth from 1953 to 1970 was 11 percent. Since 1964,however, growth has slowed to 3 percent per year (page 21).

1

;

Page 14: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

-,

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of the National Science Foundation'sSurvey of Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges, 1971, dealingexclusively with the employment of scientific and engineering personnel andthe financing of scientific activities in U.S. institutions of higher education.It is the fourth in a series of biennial surveys instituted in 1964) Earliersurveys, conducted in 1954, 1958, and 1961 were more limited in scopethan the current series. The 1954 survey, for example, collected informationon the scientific activities of only 190 "large" institutions, while the 1961survey requested only manpower data.

The survey obtained employment figures for scientists and engineers,graduate students receiving stipends for part-time services as scientists orengineers, and scientific and engineering technicians, as of mid-January1971, and current and capital expenditures for research, development, andinstruction in the sciences and engineering during the academic year 1969-70. Data for universities and colleges are presented in _part I of the report,while data relating to university-administered Federally Funded Researchand Development Centers (FFRDC's) are presented in part II. The mutualexclusivity of the figures in the two parts should be kept in mind whenstatistics shown in this report for universities and colleges (part I) are com-pared with other statistics, such as those published by the U.S. Office ofEducation, which reflect overall totals for higher education, including uni-versity-administered FFRDC's.

Totals for Federal academic science support shown in this report are notdirectly comparable to those published in the National Science Foundation'sannual report to the President and Congress, Federal Support to Universities.

1 Results of the 1964 survey were published in National Science Foundation, ScientificActivities at Universities and Colleges. 1964 (NSF 68.22). 1968; those of the 1969 survey inResources for Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges. 1969 (NSF 70.16), 1970 (Washington.D.C. 20402: Supt. of Documents. U.S. Government Printing Office). The results of the 1966 surveywere not published separately, but summary figures were included in the report on the 1969 survey.

vii

i

Colleges, and Selected Nonprofit lnslished here represent actual expendwhile those for Federal agencies reprodistinction_ between obligations (i.e..penditures (i.e.. funds actually spenshould be kept in mind when figurewith statistics based upon the obligat

The major conceptual differencepublished reports in the series is thaeted R&D expenditures (primarily deheading "Current R&D Expenditunfor Instruction and Departmental Rcaugment the R&D expenditure total'million in 1966, and S450 million ifleets more accurately the apportioitween research and development orother.

The manpower figures presented iithe definition of "scientists and engengaged in patient care. This adjustnfor "total scientists and engineers ClJanuary 1965, and about 5,000 in 19

Details regarding the scope, covertions of the survey are presented inreproduced in the appendixes aremarizing survey data for selected casurvey, as follows: Appendix B, 2,1cmedical schools; appendix C, 105 mversity-administered FFRDC's. Survedix E.

2 See related reports on inside cover.

Page 15: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

of the National Science Foundation'sjniversities and Colleges. 1971, dealingscientific and gineering personnel and

in U.S. institutions of higher education.tial surveys instituted in 1964) Earlierand 1961 were more limited in scope

rvey, for example, collected information(90 "large" institutions, while the 1961

'at figures for scientists and engineers,s for part-time services as scientists orleering technicians, as of mid-Januarynditures for research, development, and!leering during the academic year 1969-es are presented in part I of the report,'ministered Federally Funded Research-s) are presented in part II. The mutual.o parts should be kept in mind wheniversities and colleges (part I) are com-those published by the U.S. Office ofals for higher education, including uni-

cc support shown in this report are noted in the National Science Foundation'singress, Federal Support to Universities,

!shed in National Science Foundation. Scientific(NSF 68.22). 1968: those or the 1969 survey inc and Colleges. 1969 (WS:: 70.16). 1970 (Washington.tent Printing Office). The results of the 1966 surveytires were included in the report on the 1969 survey.

vii

Colleges, and Selected Nonprofit lnstitutions2 because financial figures pub-lished here represent actual expenditures of the educational institutions,while those for Federal agencies represent obligations to the institutions. Thedistinction between obligations (i.e., funds allocated by the source) and ex-penditures (i.e., funds actually spent by the performer) in any given yearshould be kept in mind when figures presented in this report are comparedwith statistics based upon the obligations of Federal agencies;

The major conceptual difference between this report and the previouslypublished reports in the series is that for the first time nonseparately budg-eted R&D expenditures (primarily departmental research) are included in theheading "Current R&D Expenditures" rather than "Current Expendituresfor Instruction and Departmental Research." The effect of this change is toaugment the R&D expenditure totals by about S320 million in 1964, S370million in 1966, and S450 million in 1968. It is believed that this shift re-flects more accurately the apportionment of current funding emphasis be-tween research and development on the one hand, and instruction on theother.

The manpower figures presented in this report incorporate a refinement inthe definition of "scientists and engineers" to exclude physicians primarilyengaged in patient care. This adjustment has led to a reduction in the figurefor "total scientists and engineers employed" amounting to about 7,000 inJanuary 1965, and about 5,000 in 1967 and 1969.

Details regarding the scope, coverage, methods of estimating and limita-tions of the survey are presented in the technical notes in appendix A. Alsoreproduced in the appendixes are the consolidated questionnaires sum-marizing survey data for selected categories of institutions covered in thesurvey, as follows: Appendix B, 2,198 universities and colleges, including allmedical schools; appendix C, 105 medical schools; and appendix D, 35 uni-versity-administered FFRDC's. Survey instructions are reproduced in appen-dix E.

2See related reports on inside cover.

1

Page 16: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

IS-

Part I

UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES

Page 17: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Section 1. SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL

This section of the report analyzes the princi-pal employment characteristics of scientific per-sonnel engaged in teaching, research, and otherscientific and engineering activities in the 2,198universities and colleges with such programs inJanuary 1971. Excluded from this section andelsewhere in part I are employment and fi-nancial characteristics of university-administeredFFRDC's, which are shown separately in part IIof this report.

Employment statistics reported here are ana-lyzed by employment status, function, discipli-nary field, type of institution (highest degreegranted in the sciences and engineering), level ofeducational attainment (highest earned degree ofthe scientist or engineer), and geographic area.To the extent possible, statistics for 1971 arecompared with data for earlier years.'

Figures on the employment of scientists and engineersshown in this report for years prior to 1971 represent slightdownward revisions (about 3 percent in 1969) from those shownin National Science Foundation, Resources for Scientific Activ-ities at Universities and Colleges, /969 (NSF 70.16) (Washing-ton, D.C., 20402, Supt. of Documents, U.S. Government Print-ing Office, 1971), p.2. The revisions reflect principally the excluMon of M.D.'s and other healthprofessional personnel primarilyengaged in patient care and other clinical activities in university-operated hospitals from scientific employment classifications.

Rates of change in FTEa scientists and engineersengaged in research and development in universi-ties and colleges and all other sectors of theeconomy, 1965-69 and 1969-71

Average annual percent change

4

Total

2

Universities and colleges

All othersectors .n"

0 2

afultime equivalentSOURCE: National Science Foundation

1965-69

1969.71

6

FTE3 scientists and engineers employed in univer-sities and colleges, by function

(Thousands)250

200

150

100

50

01965 1967

Fulltime equivalentSOURCE: National Science Foundation

1969 1971

Page 18: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

-- -

ND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL

princi-ic per-other2,198ms inn andndfi-isteredpart II

e ana-iscipli-degreevel of

tree ofarea.

71 are

ngineersit slightc shossoc ActivVash lug-

t Print-e exclu-rimarilywersit y-cat ions.

Rates of change in FTEa scientists and engineersengaged in research and development in universi-ties and colleges and all other sectors of theeconomy, 1965-69 and- 1969-71--

Average annual percent change -

-4 2 0 2 4

Total

6

Universities and colleges

All othersenors

aFulltime equivalent

SOURCE: National Science Foundation

FTEa scientists and engineers employed in univer-sities and colleges, by function(Thousands)

250

200

Total

Average annual growth rate

(percent)150

1965 69 196941

Teething Total 8.6 5.7Teaching 9.8 8.5R&D 5.7 .6

100 Other 7.7 .6

50

01965 1967 1969 1971

'Fun -time equivalent

SOURCE: National Science Foundation

Scientists and Engineers

Universities and colleges employed 274,000scientists and engineers in 1971.2 an increaseof 5 percent per year over the 246.000 em-ployed in 1969. This represents a reduced rateof increase from the 8-percent annual growthbetween 1965 and 1969. Part-time faculty andother professional staff continued to account forapproximately one-fifth the total number ofscientists and engineers. A large proportion ofthese professionals are utilized in evening pro-grams in institutions located in large metropoli-tan areas. Another sizable group are health-pro-fessionals employed in medical schools and upi-versity-owned hospitals.

In terms of the full-time-equivalent (FTE)number of R&D scientists and engineers, how-ever, universities and colleges reported a smalldecline, less than 1 percent, during the 1969-71period, a marked change from the 6-percentaverage annual growth that occurred during theearlier 4 years. The latter period, 1969-71, wasone of decline in the total number of R&Dscientists and engineers in all sectors, of whichuniversities and colleges account for about one-tenth. The decline in the academic sector waswell below the rate of the other major sectors ofthe economy.

Important shifts in the functional pattern ofscientific and engineering employment are devel-oping as a result of the reduced rate of growth inFederal R&D support to universities and col-leges. Consequently, the FTE's in research anddevelopment dropped from 26 percent of totalemployment in 1965 to 20 percent in 1971. Incontrast, FTE scientists and engineers in teach-ing increased 9 percent per year during 1969-71,nearly matching the 10-percent annual growthduring the 1965-69 period.

2 Excludes graduate students working as scientists and engi-neers. These students are covered separately in a later section.

Page 19: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Educational attainment of scientists and engineersemployed in universities and colleges

1967

1969

1971

Institutions

Wanting

Doctoratedegree

Matter'sdegree

Bachelor's

*In

No sciencedens

ekt

A30% 10%

,-..

Tr

30% 10%

-Le...,1,-4 29% 9%

In institutions grouped by highest science orengineering degree awarded, 1871

III Ph.D. or Sc.°. El Menses

IIIIM.D., D.D.S., etc. El Bachelor's or the equivalent

SOURCE: National Wanes Foundation.

Educational Attainment

The attainment of the doctorate degree isincreasingly important for employment withinthe academic sector. Since 1965 the proportionof employed scientists and engineers with doc-torate degrees has further increased while theproportion of master's and bachelor's degreeholders have declined.

In 1971, nearly two-thirds of all scientists andengineers employed at universities and collegeshad a Ph.D. or a health-professional doctorate.This high proportion with 1.octorate degrees isattributable to the fact that most doctorate-granting institutions require an earned doctorateas a prerequisite for acquiring tenure facultyrank. Consequently, three-fourths of all thescientists and engineers in doctorate-grantinginstitutions hold a doctorate degree, while innonscience-degree-granting institutions,3 doctor-ate holders account for only 15 percent ofthe total.

Field of Employment

Each field of employment has maintained arelatively constant share of the total throughoutthe 1965-71 period. The most significant adjust-ment occurred in the social sciences, growingfrom 18 percent of the total in 1965 to 22 per-cent in 1971. Employment in the life scienceshas increased steadily, although at a moderate7-percent annual rate from 1965 to 1971. Otherareas such as mathematics and psychology ex-perienced rapid growth from 1965-69, and rath-er moderate growth during the 1969-71 period.

3Here and elsewhere in this report, the terms "noscience-degree" refers to institutions that offer no degrees in the sciencesand engineering at the baccalaureate or higher level.

2

Scieand(Thou

120

100

80

40

20

Page 20: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Educational Attainment

The attainment of the doctorate degree isincreasingly important for employment withinthe academic sector. Since 1965 the proportionof employed scientists and engineers with doc-torate degrees has further increased while theproportion of master's and bachelor's degreeholders have declined.

In 1971, nearly two-thirds of all scientists andengineers employed at universities and collegeshad a Ph.D. or a health-professional doctorate.This high proportion with doctorate degrees isattributable to the fact that most doctorate-granting institutions require an earned doctorateas a prerequisite for acquiring tenure facultyrank. Consequently, three-fourths of all thescientists and engineers in doctorate-grantinginstitutions hold a doctorate degree, while innonscience-degree-granting institution s,3 doctor-ate holders account for only 15 percent ofthe total.

Field of Employment

Each field of employment has maintained arelatively constant share of the total throughoutthe 1965-71 period. The most significant adjust-ment occurred in the social sciences, growingfrom 18 percent of the total in 1965 to 22 per-'cent in 1971. Employment in the life scienceshas increased steadily, although at a moderate7-percent annual rate from 1965 to 1971. Otherareas such as mathematics and psychology ex-perienced rapid growth from 1965-69, and rath-er moderate growth during the 1969-71 period.

3Here and elsewhere in this report, the terms "nosciencedegree" refers to institutions that offer no degrees in the sciencesand engineering at the baccalaureate or higher level.

Scientists and engineers employed in universitiesand colleges, by field of employment(Thousands)

120

100

80

so

40

20

01965 1967 1969

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table B.2)

-*---- Life scientists

'4.---- Social scientists

.... .00... ...

........ lam. ..... .....

gal. ....... ....... ... Physical scientists

,....'".---Engineers ...."'"..- ...

.... ...........- '----Mathsmaticians...

'......----- Psychologists

1971

t

i

Page 21: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Function

The primary function of scientists and engi-neers in the academic sector shifted towardsmore teaching and less research between 1965and 1971. During this period those employedprimarily as teachers increased from 68 percentof total employment in 1965 to 73 percent in1971, while those primarily engaged in researchdeclined. Those teaching in the social sciences,psychology, and mathematics significantly in-creased their share of the total reported primari-ly as instructors. In contrast, no appreciablechange in the distribution of research scientistsoccurred. Life scientists continued to accountfor three-fifths the number engaged primarily inR&D activities.

Type of Institution

Doctorate-granting institutions employed 64percent of all scientists and engineers and 86percent of the life scientists in the university andcollege sector. The principal factor contributingto this concentration is the large number of per-sonnel employed in university-affiliated medicalschools, hospitals, and agricultural _experimentstations.

Medical schools and their affiliated hospitalsand clinics employed 56,000 scientists and en- loogineers, or 20 percent of those employed in allunits of universities and colleges. Nearly all ofthe scientists employed at medical schools were 75

life scientists and 84 percent of these were en-gaged in the medical sciences. These personnelaccounted for 77 percent of all the medical sci- 50

entists in the higher education sector.

Social scientists rank second in terms ofnumbers employed, with 22 percent of the 25

sector total. Their influence on employment lev-els within institutions granting master's, bache-lor's, or no-science degrees is, however, signifi-cant since they represent the predominant fieldof science with 36 percent, 39 percent, and 30percent of the total, respectively.

Scientists and engineers employed in universitiesand colleges, by field, 1971

(Thousands)

60

20

By function

Total: 273,800

TeachingResearch and development

Other activities

a

Life Social Physical Maths- Engineers Psycholoscientists scientists scientists maticians gists

In institutions rou ghost scienceor engineering degree 'clod

(Thousands)

125

No science degree

Bachelor's degreeMaster's degreeDoctorete degree

Life Social Physical Engineers Meths- Psycholoscientists scientists scientists maidens gists

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 8)

Page 22: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Geographic Distribution

Universities and colleges in the highly urban-ized Middle Atlantic and East North Central di-visions account for 39 percent of total scientificand engineering employment. This ratio has remained constant for the last 6 years.

Institutions in the West North Central divisionmaintained a 7-percent annual growth from1969-71; however, this was significantly belowthe 10-percent rate established between 1965and 1969. The New England growth also slowedfrom a 9-percent annual rate between 1965 and1969 to only 3 percent in the 1969-71 period.Harvard University and the Massachusetts Insti-tute of Technology together employed 800 few-er scientists and engineers in 1971 than in 1969.

There were seven States with 10,000 or morescientists and engineers employed in their uni-versities and colleges; together these seven ac-counted for 47 percent of the U.S. total. NewYork educational institutions lead the list with34,000 scientists and engineers followed by Cal-ifornia with 27,000.

Geographic distribution of scientists and engineer

Total:

Witt North CMountain

0MAIVAII

'Includes Alaska and Hawaii

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 8.7)

Page 23: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

to highly urban-orth Central di-d* total scientific'his ratio has re-ars.

Central divisionI growth fromtificantly belowbetween 1965

wth also slowedtween 1965 and1969 -71 period.sachusetts lnsti-ployed 800 few-71 than in 1969.

10,000 or moreed in their uni-these seven ac-U.S. total. New.ad the list withfollowed by Cal-

Geographic distribution of scientists and engineers employed in universities and colleges, 1971

Total: 273,000

West North CentralMountain

East North Central

New England

.46 Noddle Atlantic

Na.... (Pb

'Includes Alaska and Hawaii

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 841

4

South Atlantic

rl10,000 or mote

2,0004,0005,000.10,000

tinder 2,000

Page 24: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Graduate Students

This portion of the report summarizes statis-tical data on graduate students who devote partof their time to graduate study while also receiv-ing compensation for part-time work. This cate-gory includes graduate students receiving com-pensation as teaching or research assistants andthose receiving other forms of financial aid thatrequire professional services in the sciences andengineering. Excluded are graduate students re-ceiving nonduty stipends and others who may beengaged in scientific and engineering activitieson a noncompensatory basis.

Total graduate enrollment in the sciences andengineering increased at a 6 percent annual ratebetween 1965 and 1971. while employed gradu-ate students increased by 8 percent per year.During this period employed graduate studentsincreased from 22 percent of total enrollment in1965 to 26 percent in 1971.

The 94,000 graduate students employed inuniversities and colleges in 1971 represent anannual growth of 6 percent over the 84,000 em-ployed in 1969. This is a significant decreasefrom the 10-percent annual increase rate estab-lished between 1965 and 1969. Especially af-fected were students working in the physicalsciences. These students, accounting for 26 per-cent of the graduate student total, experiencedthe lowest annual growth rate between 1969 and1971, at 3 percent.

In terms of full-time equivalents, employedgraduate students numbered 43,000 with anannual growth rate of only 3 percent. Likescientists and engineers, the number of FTEgraduate students working on R&D projectsexperienced slower growth; the increase in theirFTE numbers has fallen from an annual rate of8 percent in the 1965-69 period to only 2 per-cent per year from 1969-71.

Graduate students employed' in universities and coil

(Thousands)

100

80

20

Psychologists

Mathematicians

01965

Life scientists

Physical scientists

1967 1969

'Graduate students receiving compensation for part-time seSOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table

Number of graduate students receiving compensation for part.time serviand FTE graduate students, by function

(Numbers in thousar

Function

Number of graduate students

FTE graduate students

TeachingResearch and developmentOther activities

1965

58.4

27.6

13.813.0

.8

5

Page 25: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

qatis-: partxeiv-cate-corn-s andI thats andis re-ly bevities

s andI ratera du-

year.dents.nt in

ed innt an0 em-reaSe

'stab-y

per -

'nced) and

dyedh anLikeFTE

'jeststheirto ofper-

Graduate students employed' in universities and colleges, by field of employment

(Thousands)

100

80

60

40

20

01965

_

Life scientists

Ne11:40...... -

Physical scientists

1967 1969 1971

Average annual

growth rate(percent)

1965.691969.71

Total 9.6 5.9

Social scientists 17.3 6,1

Psychologists 16.3 8.4Mathematicians 13.0 4,4Life scientists 7.3 8.2Physical scientists 6.9 2.8Engineers 6.6 7.1

'Graduate students receiving compensation for part-time services as scientists or engineers.SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 8-11)

Number of graduate students receiving compensation for pan-time services as scientists or engineers in universities and colleges.and FTE graduate students. by function. selected years. 1965.71

[Numbers in thousands)

Function JanuaryCompound annual rateof increase (percent)

1965 1967 1969 1971 196569 1969.71Number of graduate students 58.4 71.8 84.1 94.3 9.6 5.9FTE graduate students 27.6 33.8 40.3 43.0 9.9 3.3

Teaching 13.8 16.2 20.7 22.8 10.7 5.0Research and development 13.0 16.6 17.9 18.6 8.3 2.0Other activities .8 1.0 1.7 1.6 20.9 -4.3

5

Page 26: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Graduate students employed in universities andcolleges, by field of employment, 1971

(Total: 94.300)

PhysicalWells

Life Kiwis

Steelsings

Engineering

filethemetice

0

(hunt)10 20 30

1 1

Psychology

1

1

1

44.1711.SOURCE: National Science foundation lApoencae Tattle 1111

The FTE number of graduate students work-ing as teaching assistants or instructors main-tained a higher growth pattern than those work-ing on R&D projects. Strength in the employ-ment of graduate students as instructors in thelife and social sciences as well as recent limita-tions of R&D funding account for the variancein growth patterns between graduate studentsin these two activities.

The physical and life sciences together ac-counted for one-half the number of teaching orresearch assistantships in 1970, and providedemployment for one-half the number of gradu-ate students working as scientists in 1971.

Graduate students working primarily as teach-ing assistants comprised the greatest proportionof employed students in all of the broad fieldsexcept the life sciences and engineering. In thelife sciences both teaching assistants and thoseprimarily working on R&D projects numbered11,200. However, 58 percent of the graduatestudents employed as engineers were primarilyworking on R&D projects.

Graduate students employed in universities and Graduate nudecolleges; by field and function, 1971a colleges, by goo

Total: 94,300 A136541

Phyeicalscientists

Lifescientists

OP rends)11 16 12 II

Metlawneliciene

Teething

Resew") and development

Othei* -.roes

15 12

GraduW students reakkl COmPfltation fa pitttirm strOan$61013its at Miimers.

SOURCE: Nationel Science Foundation (Appendix Table "111 SOURCE: National Sao

From 1969die Atlantic digraduate studela higher rate tIAll other divishgrowth in thewith employmi1965 and 1969was hardest hitof 9 percent frthe 1969-71 tin

Page 27: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

s and

: 94,300)

30

is work-rs main-se work-employ-rs in theIt limita-variancestudents

ether ac-, ching orprovided

of gradu-

as teach-Foportionad fields

hg. In thend thosecumberedgraduateprimarily

Graduate students employed in universities and Graduate students employed in universities and

colleges; by field and function, 1971a colleges, by geographic division

Total: 94,300 Average annual rates of growth1965-69 - 1969.1971

16 12 3 4 0 (Percent) 0 4 8 12 32

Physical

scientists

Lifescientists

Socialscientists

Engineers

Mathematicians

Psychologists

(Thousands)

6 B 10 12 14

Teaching

Research and development

Other activities

'Graduate students receiving compensation for pan-time services asscientists or engineers.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 13-10 SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 813)

East North Central

Meddle Atlantic

South Atlantic

West North Central'

England

West South Central

East South Central

Outlying

From 1969 to 1971, institutions in the Mid-dle Atlantic division increased employment ofgraduate students at an annual rate of 8 percent,a higher rate than in the previous 4-year period.All other divisions experienced declining rates ofgrowth in the current period when comparedwith employment patterns established between1965 and 1969. The West North Central divisionwas hardest hit, dropping from an annual growthof 9 percent from 1965-69 to only 3 percent inthe 1969-71 time frame.

Page 28: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Technicians

Trends, 1965-71

The recent leveling off of Federal R&D sup-port to universities and colleges has imposedmore severe limitations on technician employ-ment than on science professionals. Since 1969technicians have experienced a slight decline innumbers compared with a 9-percent annual in-crease from 1965-69. This curtailment in em-ployment has affected technicians employed inboth R&D and "other" activities at universitiesand colleges.

Field of Employment and Function

The life sciences accounted for three-fourthsof all science and engineering technicians em-ployed at universities and colleges in 1971. Med-ical and health-related technicians working pri-marily in medical schools and affiliated hospitalsalone represent 36 percent of the techniciantotal. Biological technicians working in agri-cultural experiment stations along with largenumbers in medical schools account for an addi-tional 28 percent of the total.

Although 69 percent of all technicians wereprimarily employed on R&D projects in 1971,this ratio varied considerably when analyzed byfield of employment. The heaviest concentrationof R&D technicians, 77 percent, occurred in thebiological sciences compared with only 58 per-cent in the social sciences.

Type of Institution

Science technicians are almost exclusively em-ployed at doctorate-granting institutions whereextensive research in life science facilities re-quires large numbers of support personnel. Medi-cal schools were the principal employer of tech-nicians, accounting for 46 percent of the aca-demic sector total. More than three-fourths ofthese were medical technicians, with most of theremainder working in the biological sciences.

Technicians employed in the sciences and engi- Technicneering in universities and colleges grouped

(Thousands)By function awarded

15

10

Avenge annual growth rate

(percent)Research andill development 1965.69 196941

r"-1 Other Total 9.4 .2l I activities R&O 8.7 .5

Other 11.1 .6

1965 1967 1969 1971

By fold and function, 1971

Life sciences' Engineering Physical Social.

sciences sciences

SOURCE: National Science Foundation !Appendix Table 8.16)

7

OtheActivitic

R&

'Includes 2R&D and 6

SOURCE:

Technicia

In carrgranting ii100 FTEutilizationmore prosratio is nengineer.

Number ofengineers inscience or ein which pri

Type of iTotal . . .

Institutions grDoctorate:

Total .Medical

Master's .

Bachelor'sNo science

Page 29: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

I R&D sup-las imposedian employ-Since 1969

it decline int annual in-tent in em-.mployed inuniversities

h ree-fourthsnicians em-1971. Med-

vorking pri-ed hospitals

technicianum in agri-

with largefor addi-

ticians werets in 1971,inalyzed byncentrationurred in thetly 58 per-

lusively em-ions where`acilities re-mnel. Medi-yer of tech-of the aca--fourths ofmost of theal sciences.

a

Technicians employed in the sciences and engi-neering in universities and colleges

B(Thousands)

y function

Research and

development

r-1 Otheractivities

Average annual growth rate

(percent)

1965.691969.71

Total 9.4 .2R&D 8.7 .5Other 11.1 .6

1965 1967 1969

By field and function, 1971

1971

Research and development

O Other activities

Life sciences Engineering Physical Socialwitness sciences

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table B16)

7

molEr

Technicians employed in universities and collegesgrouped by highest science and engineering degreeawarded, by primary ftinction, 1971

OtherActivities 31%

27%

71%

90% 93%

R&O 69% 73%

29%

10% 7%

All institutions Institutions granting.

46.000 Doctorate Master's Bachelor's No sciencedegrees degree degree degree

42,100 1,400 600 1,300

°Includes 21.3 thousand employed in medical schools (15.3 thousand inR&D and 6 0 thousand in other activities)

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 6.16)

Technician-Professional Ratios

In carrying out R&D activities, doctorate-granting institutions averaged 65 technicians per100 FTE research professionals. This moderateutilization of technicians in R&D performance ismore pronounced in medical schools where theratio is nearly one technician per scientist orengineer.

Number of technicians per 100 FTE scientists andengineers in universities and colleges grouped by highestscience or engineering degree awarded, by functionin which primarily employed, 1971

Type of institution TotalResearch anddevelopment

Otheractivities

Total 19.0 64.1 7.3Institutions granting:

Doctorate:Total 27.2 65.2 10.4Medical schools . . . 46.9 93.8 20.7

Master's 4.4 36.0 3.2Bachelor's 2.4 13.6 2.2No science degree. , . . 4.4 97.1 4.1

Page 30: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Section 2. SCIENCE EXPENDITURES

Financing of Scientific Activities

Universities and colleges in the United Statesallocated 57.9 billion in current and capital ex-penditures for research, development, and in-struction in the sciences and engineering during1970. This amount represents 33 percent of theS24.2 billion expended by universities and col-leges for all types of activities, a slight declinefrom the 36 percent ratio established in 1968.'

Growth in science expenditures levelled off at6 percent per year (1 percent in constant dol-lars) for universities and colleges in the 1968-70period after averaging increases of 15 percentduring the previous 4 years (12 percent in con-stant dollars). Total nonscience funding duringthe 1968-70 period, however, being less sensitiveto fluctuations in Federal support, advanced atan annual rate of 16 percent.

Doctorate-level institutions again, as in earliersurvey years, accounted for nearly four-fifths ofthe total science expenditures. Nearly one-halfof the remainder was spent by institutions grant-ing the master's as the highest degree. Theseproportions have remained relatively stable since1968.

The recent slowdown in the growth of scienceexpenditures is much more apparent in privateinstitutions than in those under public control.Between 1964 and 1968 the rates of growth inthe two groups were quite similar; but between

Estimates of total current and capital expenditures ofuniversities and colleges are based on data in U.S. Office ofEducation, Projections of Educational Statistics to 1979.80(0E.1 0030.70) (Washington, D.C. 20402: Supt. of Documents,U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971), p. 91. The U.S. Officeof Education figures for all institutions of higher educationwere adjusted to exclude expenditures of university.administeredFFRDC's, which are presented at the end of this report.

Total and science and engineering expenditures forall activities in universities and colleges, 1964.70

(Billions of dollars)

30

20

10

Average annual growth rate

(percent)

TotalSciences and

engineeringAll other

01964 1966=

'Based on GNP implicit price deflator

SOURCE: National Science Foundation

1968 1970

Growth in scientific and engineering expendituresof publicly and privately controlled universitiesand colleges, 1964-68 and 1968-70

All institutions

Publicly.controlled

universities

Privately-controlled

universities

Average annual percent change

114%

3%

16%

1964.68 ri 1968.10

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 1319)

8

1968tutiotionspendinstitexpeappr

In1,05thoututi64pendspon$50

Dfundthreinstrnualmanpen(Thescietsize.theand

Toteng

ditudoll

Cur

Cur

Cap

Page 31: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

EXPENDITURES

ties

nited Statesd capital ex-ent, and in-ering during,rcent of the

ities and colslight declineed in 1968.1

evelled off at:onstant dol-the 1968-70

1 15 percentrcent in con-nd ing duringless sensitiveadvanced at

, as in earlierfour-fifths ofarly one-halftu t ions grant-legree. Thesey stable since

th of sciencelit in privateublic control.of growth inbut between

expenditures ofin U.S. Office ofstics to 1979.80t. of Documents,

I The U.S. Officehigher education

Nit y.ad ministers d1 of this report.

Total and science and engineering expenditures forall activities in universities and colleges, 1964-70

(Billions of dollars)

30

20

10

01964 1966

a Based on GNP implicit price deflator

SOURCE: National Science Foundation

Average annual growth rate

(percent)

TotalSciences and

engineeringAll other

1968 1970

Growth in scientific and engineering expendituresof publicly and privately controlled universitiesand colleges, 1964.68 and 1968-70

All institutions

Publicly-controlled

universities

Privately-controlled

universities

Average annual percent change

15%

iMin.150114%

16%

3% 0 1964.68 El 1968-70

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 13191

1968 and 1970 the grt wth rate in private insti-tutions was only one-third that in public institu-tions. Private institutions are more heavily de-pendent on Federal science support since publicinstitutions receive a large share of their scienceexpenditures from State and local governmentappropriations.

Institutions under public control numbered1,054, including some 800 junior colleges. Al-though comprising only 48 percent of the insti-tutions surveyed, this group was responsible for64 percent of the scientific and engineering ex-penditures reported in the survey. Chiefly re-sponsible were 17 large State universities withS50 million or more in science expenditures..

During the 1968-70 period, the change infunding levels varied considerably among thethree types of science expenditures. Scienceinstruction showed a substantial 11-percent an-nual growth while current R&D expendituresmanaged only 5 percent per year. Capital ex-penditures actually declined 5 percent per year.The following table, showing the distribution ofscience and engineering expenditures, empha-sizes the continued growth in instruction andthe levelling off of research and developmentand capital expenditures since 1964.

Total science andengineering expen-ditures (millions ofdollars)

Current R&Dexpenditures . .

Current expendituresfor instruction . .

Capital expenditures .

1964 1966 1968 1970

$3,959.2 $5,129.0 $6,957.3 $7,872.5

Percent Distribution

40.3 40.6 37.4 36.3

46.3 46.4 47.3 51.6

13.4 13.0 15.4 12.1

Page 32: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Selected characteristics of current and capital ex-penditures for research, development, and instruc-tion in the sciences and engineering in universitiesand colleges, 1970

Total: $7.872.4 million

Research &

development36% t

III

Current expenditures

I

Instruction52%

Bachelor's degree 6%

i

Type of Expenditure

Doctoratedegree

78%

...--""

Type of Institution(Baud on highest degree awarded)

Type of Control

SOURCE: National Science Foundation

494.200 0 - 73. 2

Current R&D Expenditures

The Nation's institutions of higher educationallocated $2.9 billion to current expendituresfor research and development in 1970, 11 per-cent of total R&D expenditures reported by allsectors of the economy. The 5-percent annualgrowth . er the 1968 total marks a considerableslowdown from the average annual increase of13 percent between 1964 and 1968. When meas-ured in terms of 1964 dollars, growth in the1964-68 period drops to 10 percent per yearand the 1968-70 increase is erased.

The 1968-70 decline in the rate of R&Dgrowth in the academic sector, however, was lessthan that experienced in the other sectors. Theproportion of the Nation's R&D effort con-ducted in universities and colleges has increasedfrom 8 percent in 1964 to 11 percent in 1970.

9

Page 33: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Current R&D Expenditures

The Nation's institutions of higher educationallocated 52.9 billion to current expendituresfor research and development in 1970, 11 per-cent of total R&D expenditures reported by allsectors of the economy. The 5-percent annualgrowth over the 1968 total marks a considerableslowdown from the average annual increase of13 percent between 1964 and 1968. When meas-ured in terms of 1964 dollars, growth in the1964-68 period drops to 10 percent per yearand the 1968-70 increase is erased.

The 1968-70 decline in the rate of R&Dgrowth in the academic sector, however, was lessthan that experienced in the other sectors. Theproportion of the Nation's R&D effort con-ducted in universities and colleges has increasedfrom 8 percent in 1964 to 11 percent in 1970.

9

Annual rates of change in R&D expenditures ofuniversities and colleges and all other sectors ofthe economy, 1964-68 and 1968-70

Average annual percent change

Total

Totaluniversities

and colleges

All other sectors

7

2%

5

2%

EI 1964-68

1968.70

SOURCE: National Science Foundation

Page 34: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Source of Funds

Universities and colleges rely upon outsidesources of support for more than three-fourthsof the total funds expended for research anddevelopment. There has been a steady rise overthe years in the Federal Government's share oftotal R&D expenditures among institutions ofhigher education. Since 1968, however, the Fed-eral share levelled off at about three-fifths theacademic R&D total. While Federal funds havecontinued to increase, their annual growth ratehas fallen to 3 percent between 1968 and 1970compared to 14 percent between 1964 and1968. In constant dollars, Federal funds haveactually declined 2 percent since 1968. Non-Federal sources of support have not compen-sated in total for this slowdown in Federal R&Dfunds.

Curre

(Millio

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

01

as

S

A expenditures for research and development a

Is of dollars)

"N

////--

1 I I J 1 I I I

153 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61

ised on,the GNP implicit price deflator)URCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 8.21

10

Page 35: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

outsidefourthsch andse overhare ofions ofhe Fed-Ihs theds haveth rated 197064 andds have.. Non-ompen-al R&D

Current expenditures for research and development at universities and colleges, 1953-1971

(Millions of dollars)

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

Total R&D expenditures

.... .. ../////

Constant

(1964) dollarsa

/

.... ..... .....

/

/ /

...........OM. 0....

i I I I li.

Federally financed R&D expenditures

i Ili! IIi It0' 1953 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70

aBased on the GNP implicit price deflator ,

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table B21)

10

i

1

Page 36: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Current expenditures for research and development at universitiesand colleges, by character of work, 1953.70

(Millions of dollars)

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

Federal R&D expenditures at universities and colleges,by character of work, 1953.70(MilSon't 01 donors)

1,100

1/00

,.500

1.000

1.300

1,200

1,100

IA00

900

800

000

600

500

000

300

200

100

1953

=.l'"./////

0.'SAW Irainft

...//..4We I

/I

e/Apobta .ch--........ ............

._........°..........." , ......... «.......... e

ofttiOrme".>........I I I 1

........111440t"...}..'r.s4 55 56 SY 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 00

Total-

Applied research .............

tar.........................................................

woo

...... ff .....

Development

a 0.0 -,;10 r si-- -r " -r I- .7. I I

1953 54. 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 8.22)

11

Characte

Univer.perform(search an1964, theeentra dotever, basiat aboutpenditureincrease ocent yearlOn the ofsearch atannually Ian averagthroughot

Federalthis shiftFederal d29 percegrowth toIn 1964 tto non-Fehad growagencies,ministratiHealth, Etributed 1activitieseducation

Appliecously tlira somewh1964 thacurred cvincrease spercentshown aacademic44 percen

Page 37: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

ch and development at universitiesrk, 1953-70

universities and colleges,

......-."----/

/e*--- giSt truNth

//........ /

//

ARAM Walt h .............--..--....................

.._............... UM6tent

.1... ,....' r- 7 ."7 1 I0 0 64 6S 66 67 66 0 70

Total////

//////

///////

4--- Basic research

oe ............ArjltApplied research ---, ..........

......................, ................. Development

m, . ......... ... II.M OM. 4. ..-------r---r--T7 IIIII

i8 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70

don (Appendix Table 8-22)

11

Character of R&D

Universities and colleges have traditionallyperformed more basic research than applied re-search and development combined.. and until1964, the trend was toward ever increasing con-centration in basic research. Since 1964, how-ever, basic research expenditures have stabilizedat about 77 percent of total academic R&D ex-penditures; they have shown an average annualincrease of 10 percent compared with a 20 per-cent yearly growth rate between 1953 and 1964.On the other hand, expenditures for applied re-search and development increased 12 percentannually between 1964 and 1970 after showingan average annual growth of only 7 percentthroughout the earlier period.

Federal funds were an important factor inthis shift in emphasis. Between 1964 and 1970,Federal development funds grew an average of29 percent annually, nearly two times thegrowth rate of non-Federal funding in this area.In 1964 the ratio of Federal development fundsto non-Federal was 1.3 to 1; by 1970, this ratiohad grown to 2.6 to 1. R&D programs of twoagencies, National Aeronautics and Space Ad-ministration (NASA) and the Department ofHealth, Education, and Welfare (HEW), con-tributed heavily to the growth in developmentactivities undertaken in institutions of highereducation.

Applied research expenditures grew continu-ously throughout the 1953-70 period, averaginga somewhat higher average rate of increase after1964 than in the earlier years. This increase oc-curred even in the face of 2 years of the smallestincrease since 1955 - 2 percent in 1969 and 5percent in 1970. This activity, however, hasshown a relatively steady decline in its share ofacademic R&D expenditures since 1953, from44 percent to 18 percent in 1970.

Page 38: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Fields of Science

The 1964-70 period has seen very littlechange in the distribution of academic researchexpenditures among fields of science. Basic andapplied research in the life sciences have aver-aged nearly one-half total and Federal researchexpenditures at universities since 1964. Thegrowth rate in total research expenditures in thisfield has been steadily falling during this 6-yeartime span, the direct result of the slowdown inthe rate of increase in Federal support. This de-cline in the growth rate of Federal funding forlife science research is also reflected in the totalexpenditures reported by medical schools but toa somewhat lesser extent than experienced byother units of universities and colleges.

Average annual growth of current research expend-itures by field of science in universities and col-leges, 1964.68, 1968-70

(Percent)

0 5 10 15 20

Totalresearch

sciences

Physical and

environments!sciences

Engineering

social sciences

Mathematics

Psychology

Othersciences. net

25 ii 401

1964.69

1960.701

a

1

I

I 1

J

(

a Less than 0.05 percent.SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 9-20)

Current research expenditures of universities andcolleges, by field of science, and source of funds,1970

Other smut, n.e.c. 4%Pathol 3%Mathernogystics 4%Environmentalsciences 5%

3%3%3%

Total: 52,712 million

Federal

31.555 million

Non - Federal

S1,150 million

SOURCE: National Science Foundation lOueedeneetre p. es)

Social science research performed at institu-tions of higher education is the only area inwhich Federal funds have not consistently ex-ceeded support from all other sources. The Fed-eral share of funding of social science researchreached a high of 40 percent in 1968; in theother years between 1964 and 1970 Federalfunds ranged from 33 percent to 36 percent oftotal social science research expenditures. Feder-al funding for basic and applied research in thisarea was actually down in 1970 from the 1968amount as was the case in psychology, physicaland environmental sciences, and engineering,

Type of C

Publiclyaccountedcx pencil turreflects theties, 33 oftions in thtures.

While thhas declinduring themuch moFor thegrowth ratcent comptutions; wwere 7 per

The Fe(of the flupared witstions uncle

Currentloges, by

PrivateISM 33 million)

SOURC

Page 39: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

cry littleresearch

Basic andave aver-! research)64. Theres in thisris 6-yearvdown in. This Be-nding forthe total

ols but toenced by

expend-and col-

.,---.-----

Current research expenditures of universities andcolleges, by field of science, and source of funds,1970

Other sciences, n.e.c. 4%Psychology 3%Ma emetics 4%Environmentalaims 5%

3%3%3%

Total: S2,712 million

Other mime, n.e.e..0--- Psychology

tilothemeticsErn:torments, sciatic

Social edemas

5%.,ei

14% .11.

17%

49%

Federal

$1,559 million

Engineering

Physical sciences

.11.

NIL

Life sciences

Non-Federal11,1511 million

SOURCE: Nationet Scion*, Foundation I Outationnaire P. se)

Type of Control

Publicly controlled universities and collegesaccounted for three-fifths of the current R&Dexpenditures of all institutions. This primarilyreflects the influence of the large State universi-ties, 33 of which are among the top 50 institu-tions in the country in terms of R&D expendi-tures.

While the rate of growth in R&D expenditureshas declined for both groups of institutionsduring the 1964-70 period, the reduction wasmuch more severe among private institutions.For the 1964-68 period, the average annual

3% growth rate for public institutions was 14 per-4%

cent compared with 12 percent for private insti-tutions; while in the 1968-70 period, the rateswere 7 percent and I percent, respectively.

The Federal Government supplied 51 percentof the funds used by public institutions, com-pared with 69 percent of those used by institu-tions under private control.

Social science research performed at institu-tions of higher education is the only area inwhich Federal funds have not consistently ex-ceeded support from all other sources. The Fed-eral share of funding of social science researchreached a high of 40 percent in 1968; in theother years between 1964 and 1970 Federalfunds ranged from 33 percent to 36 percent oftotal social science research expenditures. Feder-al funding for basic and applied research in thisarea was actually down in 1970 from the 1968amount as was the case in psychology, physicaland environmental sciences, and engineering.

12

Current R&D expenditures of universities and col-leges, by type of control and source of funds, 1970

Toni: $2.556 million

SOURCE: National Scitna Foundation

i

Page 40: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Geographic Distribution

During the 1964-68 period, the distributionof R&D expenditures among individual geo-graphic divisions remained relatively stable. Therates of increases varied no more than 4 percent-age points; the median growth rate was 13 per-cent. Between 1968 and 1970, however, the av-erage annual increase in R&D expendituresranged from 2 percent in the East North Centralto 10 percent in the Mountain division.

Annual rates of change in current R&D expendi-tures of universities and ccileges. by geographicdistribution, 1964-68 and 11;68-70

Wet SouthCentral

SouthAtlantic

New England

Pacific

MiddleAtlantic

Wee NorthCentral

Ent SouthCentre

East NorthCentel

Mountain

_Outlyingaress

(Percent)0 4 6 12 16

1

J I

12==.71

=smizessszom3M221=3?

J

196448CI196170

SOURCE: National Seance Foundation (Appendix Table 11.251

As growth rates varied, the geographic pat-tern of R&D spending did show a slight shift.

he highly urbanized Middle Atlantic and EastNorth Central divisions' share of the total R&Dexpenditures among universities and colleges de-clined from 38 percent in 1968 to 36 percent in1970, the Middle Atlantic showing the lowestgrowth rate of any division in the 1968-70

Pacific

6139.3 million

perioiexpo i

twoof tindurintweet

Geographic distribution of current R&D expenditun

Total: $2.856 million

West North Central6237 6 million

Mountain6158.6 million

Gill)

rd. 141 fl West South Central$201.1 million

SOURCE: National Science foundation lAppenoix Table 8 29)

13

11441WIPMA

Page 41: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

ributional geo-)le. The,percent -13 per-the av-itures

Central

pendi-raphic

16

64.68

68.70

le B.251

As growth rates varied, the geographic pat-tern of R&D spending did show a slight shift.The highly urbanized Middle Atlantic and EastNorth Central divisions' share of the total R&Dexpenditures among universities and colleges de-clined from 38 percent in 1968 to 36 percent in1970, the Middle Atlantic showing the lowestgrowth rate of any divi:.'on in the 1968-70

Pacific$439.3 million

period. Four of the seven States in which R&Dexpenditures of institutions of higher educationtotaled more than S100 million belong to thesetwo divisions. Together, the R&D expendituresof these four States grew only 2 percent per yearduring 1968-70 compared to 12 percent be-tween 1964 and 1968.

Geographic distribution of current R&D expenditures of universities and colleges, 1970

Total: $2.856 million

West North Central$237.6 million

MountainS158.6 million

East North Central$485.6 million

.oca

.4.1400West South Central

5201.1 million

SOURCE National Science Foundation Ippendi Table B 291

13

PILANOss

I

to

U

rr

East South Central$1014 million

Current R&O expenditures$100 million and over50.100 million25.50 million12.25 millionLess than S12 million

New England$335.6 million

Middle Atlantic$5432 million

South Atlantic5341 4 million

El Outlying NenS12 5 mullion

Page 42: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Current R&D expenditures of universities and col-leges, by source of funds, major cost item, andtype of institution, 1970

Total: =ASS millionIndustry 2% All other 4%

Foundations 3%

Institution's own

24%

Federal

58%

Source of Funds

Indirect costs

17%

Other direct costs

27%

Wages and salaries

56%

Major Cost Item

Type of Institution(Baud on highest degree awarded)

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 8451

Selected Characteristics

Institutions granting doctorate degrees ac-counted for 96 percent of current R&D expendi-tures. This total includes 96 percent or more ofthe R&D funds from every source except insti-tutions' own funds and private philanthropicfoundations. In earlier surveys, the doctorate-granting institutions' share was slightly lower.Thus, the recent slowdown in R&D increaseswas felt more severely in nondoctorate -grantinginstitutions with less prominent researchfacilities.

Academic institutions allocated 56 percent oftheir current R&D expenditures for wages andsalaries in 1970. While this proportion has re-mained relatively constant since 1964, the slack-ened growth in Federal R&D support has affect-ed the proportion allocated for materials. sup-plies, and other direct costs. Federal funds allo-cated to these purposes declined 2 percent peryear since 1968, while non-Federal funds main-tained an 8 percent annual growth. Other directcosts, therefore, dropped from 30 percent of the1964 R&D total to 27 percent in 1970.

Current Expenditures for Instruction

Institutions of higher education allocatedS4.I billion of current funds to instruction ex-penditures in the sciences and engineering in1970. This total includes all direct and indirectcosts pertaining to educational programs for stu-dents pursuing degree-credit courses of study.Such costs include faculty salaries, stipends forgraduate teaching assistants, clerical salaries, andexpendable materials and supplies.

Estimates for direct and indirect expendi-tures for departmental research have been ex-cluded from this section and reported as part oftotal R&D expenditures. The actual or reportedexpenditures for instruction and departmentalresearch combined, and the methodology used

14

in dersearchsolidatC of tl

Instare lesare citThe Sgrowtlthan ting thnual13 pc1968capitato aconstation eand 1

Curenc z

SO

Page 43: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

ol-nd

Selected Characteristics

Institutions granting doctorate degrees ac-counted for 96 percent of current R&D expendi-tures. This total includes 96 percent or more ofthe R&D funds from every source except insti-tutions' own funds and private philanthropicfoundations. In earlier surveys, the doctorate-granting institutions' share was slightly lower.Thus, the recent slowdown in R&D increaseswas felt more severely in nondoctorate-grantinginstitutions with less prominent researchfacilities.

Academic institutions allocated 56 percent oftheir current R&D expenditures for wages andsalaries in 1970. While this proportion has re-mained relatively constant since 1964, the slack-ened growth in Federal R&D support has affect-ed the proportion allocated for materials, sup-plies, and other direct costs. Federal funds allo-cated to these purposes declined 2 percent peryear since 1968, while non-Federal funds main-tained an 8 percent annual growth. Other directcosts, therefore, dropped from 30 percent of the1964 R&D total to 27 percent in 1970.

Current Expenditures for Instruction

Institutions of higher education allocatedS4.1 billion of current funds to instruction ex-penditures in the sciences and engineering in1970. This total includes all direct and indirectcosts pertaining to educational programs for stu-dents pursuing degree-credit courses of study.Such costs include faculty salaries, stipends forgraduate teaching assistants, clerical salaries, andexpendable materials and supplies.

Estimates for direct and indirect expendi-tures for departmental research have been ex-cluded from this section and reported as part oftotal R&D expenditures. The actual or reportedexpenditures for instruction and departmentalresearch combined, and the methodology used

14

eTh

in deriving the estimates for departmental re-search are shown in the technical notes and con-solidated questionnaires in appendixes A, B, andC of this report.

Instruction expenditures based on enrollment,are less sensitive to budgetary fluctuations thanare either current or capital R&D expenditures.The S4.1 billion represents an 1 1- percent annualgrowth rate since 1968; this increase was lessthan the 1'6-percent annual rate established dur-ing the 1964-68 period. In comparison, the an-nual growth in R&D expenditures dropped from13 percent during 1964-68 to 5 percent between1968 and 1970, while the 19 percent growth incapital expenditures during 1964-68 turned in-to a 5 percent per year decrease. In terms ofconstant dollars, the rate of increase in instruc--.on expenditures was 6 percent between 1968and 1970.

Current expenditures for instruction in the sci-ences and engineering in universities and colleges

(Billions of dollars)

1964 1966 1968

oBased on GNP implicit price deflator.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation

1970

i

1

Page 44: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

The life sciences accounted for the largestshare, with 32 percent of the total, far below the48 percent life science share of research expendi-tures. The life science proportion has beensteadily decreasing since 1964, when it was 37percent of the total. Social sciences, on theother hand, have been increasing throughoutthe same period, from 18 percent in 1964 to 23percent in 1970. This is substantially higherthan their 10 percent share of research expendi-tures.

Doctorate-granting institutions, although ac-counting for 66 percent of total instruction ex-penditures, did not have the near-monopoly (96percent) displayed in the case of current R&Dexpenditures. The fact that all institutions in-cluded in the survey had instructional programsin the sciences or engineering partially offset thelarge programs evident at doctorate-granting in-stitutions.

The life sciences accounted for the largestshare of the total only in doctorate- grantinginstitutions. In all other types of institutions,the largest proportion of current instruction ex-penditures was allocated to the social sciences.The uniqueness of doctorate-granting institu-tions is largely due to the influence of medicalschools and schools of agriculture.

In medical schools, the life sciences accountedfor 99 percent of all current instruction expendi-tures. The $581 million spent for instruction bymedical schools represents a 9-percent com-pound annual increase rate over the 1968 figure,$488 million, which is slower than the 15-per-cent rate of the 1964-68 period.

1

Current expenditures for instruction in universities and colleges grosciences and engineering and field of science, 1970

Total: $4,064 million

Bachelor's

9%

Ooctoiate68%

Psychology

6%

Mathematics

9%

Engineering13%

Physical &environmental

sciences

15%

Lifesciences

32%

Social

sciences

23%

Othersciences, n.e.c.

Psychology

Mathematics

SOURCE: National Science Foundation /Appendix Table 8.30

15

Engineering

Physical &environmental

sciences

Socialsciences

Lifesciences

Institutiorograntilg-

2%4%

7%

14%

14%

20%

38%

Doctoratedegree

$2,689 million

Page 45: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

largestlow thexpendi-s beenwas 37on theughout4 to 23higher

xpendi-

ugh ac-ion ex-oly (96it R&Dons in-ogramsfset theMing in-

largestrantingtalons,ion ex-iences.institu-itedical

ounted'pendi-ion by

corn-figure,15-per-

Current expenditures for instruction in universities and colleges grouped by highest degree awarded in thesciences and engineering and field of science, 1970

Total: $4.064 million

Doctorate66%

Psychology6%

Mathematics9%

Engineering13%

Physical &environmental

sciences

15%

Lifesciences

32%

Socialsciences

23%

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 8 31)

Othersciences. n.e.c.

Psychology

Mathematics

Engineering

physical &environmental

sciences

Socialsciences

Lifesciences

Institutionsgranting

2% 3% 2% 4%4%

10% 9% 7%7%

13% 15%14%

12%

5%9%

15%14%

21%

20%

15%

20%

32%

30%25%

38%

18% 20%16%

Doctoratedegree

$2.689 million

Muter:degree

$528 million

Bachelor'sdegree

$376 million

No science

degree

$471 million

Page 46: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Institutions in the East North Central Statesallocated the largest amounts to current expend-itures for instruction, 19 percent of the total,followed by those in the Middle Atlantic States.The four largest divisions - these two plus thePacific and South Atlantic States accounted for65 percent of the total.

Geographic distribution of current expendituresfor instruction in universities and colleges, 1970

Total: $4,064 million(Millions of dollars)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

East North

Central

Middle

Atlantic

Pacific

South

Atlantic

New England

Vkst NorthCentral

WM SouthCentral

East South

Central

Mountain

Outlying

ems

I 1 II

I 1 I

I

1

I

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 8421

16

Capital Expen

Institutions ofS952 million tosearch, developmeences and engineepercent per year fin 1968. Federallyin the decline asBetween 1964 aicreased at 'an ampared with a decli1968-70 period.

The rising trenexpenditures alloction facilities was1970. This estimpercent of the t1968, and back t(in Federal fundsinstruction, and aFederal support ftween 1968 andsible.

Capital expenditufacilities and equi

(Millions of dollars)

1,000

800

400

NonFede

Federal

01964

SOURCE: Nativist Sc

Page 47: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

th Central States.) current expend-nt of the total,le Atlantic States.ese two plus the

- accounted for

ent expendituresd colleges, 1970

Ilan)500 600 700 800

non (Appendix Table 832)

16

Capital Expenditures

Institutions of higher education allocatedS952 million to capital expenditures for re-search, development, and instruction in the sci-ences and engineering in 1970. a reduction of 5percent per year from the S1.1 billion reportedin 1968. Federally financed expenditures sharedin the decline as well as the earlier sharp rise.Between 1964 and 1968 Federal support in-creased atan annual rate of 26 percent, com-pared with a decline of 9 percent per year in the1968-70 period.

The rising trend in the proportion of capitalexpenditures allocated to undergraduate instruc-tion facilities was reversed between 1968 and1970. This estimated proportion went from 45percent of the total in 1964 to 51 percent in1968, and back to 47 percent in 1970. The shiftin Federal funds towards R&D and graduateinstruction, and a 13-percent annual decline inFederal support for undergraduate facilities be-tween 1968 and 1970, were primarily respon-sible.

Capital expenditures for scientific and engineeringfacilities and equipment, by source of funds

(Millions of dollars)

1,0000 NonFederal

Federal

01964 1966 1968 1970

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table BOW

Page 48: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Medical schools accounted for 22 percent ofall science and engineering capital expendituresin 1970 and 37 percent of all those for research,development, and graduate instruction. Only 11percent of the capital expenditures of medicalschools were allocated to undergraduate instruc-tion.

All fields of science shared in the phenomenalgrowth of capital expenditures during the I 964-68 period, with annual rates of increase rangingbetween 12 percent and 25 percent. During thedecline in the 1968-70 period, however, twofields engineering and other sciences, n.e.c.continued to increase, though at much reducedrates, while expenditures in the other fieldsshowed declining rates of up to 17 percent peryear. Mathematics was the most active field,going from an increase of 25 percent per year toa decrease of 14 percent per year in the 6-yearperiod.

As was the case with current expenditures,the life sciences accounted for the largest por-tion of scientific and engineering capital expend-itures. Over one-half of the capital expendituresfinanced by the Federal Government were allo-cated to the life sciences, compared with only41 percent of those financed by other sources.

Capital expenditures for research, development,and instruction in the sciences and engineering, byfield of science and source of funds, 1970

Other sciences, n.e.c. 8%ltPsychology 2%Mathematics 4%Social sciences 7%e-

3%

14%

Total: $952 million

Engineering14%

Lifesciences

44%

Physical and

environmentalsciences

24%

23%

51%

Other sciences, n.e.c.Psychology

MathematicsSocial sciences

Engineering

Physical andenvironmental

sciences

Life sciences

8%

14%

24%

41%

Federal:$279 million

NonFederal:$673 million

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Questionnaire P. 60)

17

6%3%4%

e

b

196Cenwhit(TedWesttinu

coutore.Soutthesion.fede

TIcapitpercStatand

Page 49: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

it oftirestrch,y11dicaltruc-

enal964-RingthetwoC. -.-

deedfieldsper

field,ar toyea r

ores,nor-end-tiresallo-onlyrces.

Capital expenditures for research, development,and instruction in the sciences and engineering, byfield of science and source of funds, 1970

Other sciences, n.e.c. 6%-Psychology 2%Mathematics 4%Social sciences 7%

Total: $952 million

Engineering

14%

Lifesciences

44%

Physical and

environmentalsciences

24%

.,2%4%1 6%

3%4%

Other sciences, n.e.c.

3%4

PsychologyMathematics

14% ----Social 8%sciencesEngineering

Physical andenvironmental

sciences

Life sciences

14%

23%

24%

51%

41%

Federal: NonFederal:$279 million $673 million

SOURCE: Notional Samoa Foundation (Questionnaire P. 60)

17

Geographic distribution of capital expenditures forresearch, development, and instruction in the sci-ences and engineering in universities and colleges,by source of funds, 1970

(Millions of dollars)

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200

MiddleAtlantic

East NorthCentral

SouthAtlantic

Pacific

West NorthCentral

New England

Mountain

West SouthCentral

East SouthCentral

Outlyingareas

r I

I_

1

1

1

Federal

Non .Federal

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 13.34)

The decline in capital expenditures between1968 and 1970 was greatest in the West SouthCentral and Middle Atlantic divisions, both ofwhich reported reductions at annual rates ex-ceeding 10 percent, while New England and theWest North Central and Mountain States con-tinued to increase.

The same four geographic divisions that ac-counted for the majority of current expendi-tures - the Middle Atlantic, East North Central,Sbuth Atlantic and Pacific States - accounted forthe majority of capital expenditures. These divi-sions accounted for 63 percent of both total andfederally financed capital.

The federally financed proportion of totalcapital expenditures ranged from a high of 39percent in the East South Central and MountainStates to a low of 19 percent in New Englandand 14 percent in the outlying areas.

Page 50: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Part II

FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCHAND DEVELOPMENT CENTERSADMINISTERED BY UNIVERSITIESAND UNIVERSITY CONSORTIA

Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDC's) areR&D performing organizations substantially financed by the Federal Gov-ernment to meet either a particular R&D objective or, in some instances, toprovide major facilities at universities for research and associated trainingpurposes. This report is limited to summary data on the manpower andfinancial characteristics of FFRDC's administered by universities and uni-versity consortia. Data presented here are excluded from those for universi-ties and colleges shown in part I of this report.

Each FFRDC is a separate operational unit which conducts R&D workupon direct request of, or under a broad charter from, the sponsoring Feder-al agency. Organizationally, the centers are separate from the administeringinstitution, and are self-contained.entities insofar as their R&D work is con-cerned. Staffs normally are separate from those of the university; however,in some cases, staff members also hold faculty appointments with the uni-versity. Most FFRDC's, however, make their extensive facilities available tofaculty and graduate students of the administering university for the con-duct of research.

18

Page 51: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Section 1. SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL

Scientists and Engineers

The 35 university-administered FFRDC's em-ployed 11,300 scientists and engineers in 1971.Since 1965, however, the employment level inthe FFRDC's has been virtually unchanged, andsmall decline due to severe limitations in FederalR&D support.

The primary function of FFRDC's is R&Dperformance or management. It is, therefore,not surprising that virtually all scientists and en-gineers are engaged in R&D work.

The distribution of scientists among broadfields of employment in FFRDC's differed con-siderably from universities and colleges. Thelarge numbers of engineers and physical scien-tists employed at FFRDC's reflect the closeassociation between their R&D activities and themissions of their sponsoring agencies. Nearlytwo-thirds the research professionals at DOD-and NASA-sponsored FFRDC's were engineerswhile physical scientists comprised one-half theresearch staff at AEC-sponsored centers.

Scientists and engineers employed in universityadministered FFRDC's ,aby employment status, selected years, 1958.71

March March January January January January

Compoundannual

rate of change1958 1961 1965 1967 1969 1971

Employment status1958-69 1969.71

(Thousands) (Percent)

Number of scientists and engineers 8.5 8.9 11.0 10.7 11.5 11.3 2.8 -0.7Full time 8.3 8.7 10.8 10.5 11.2 11.0 2.7 -0.6Part time .2 .2 .2 .2 .3 .3 5.1 -3.6

FTE scientists and engineers 8.4 8.8 10.9 10.6 11.3 11.2 2.7 -0.6FTE R&D scientists and engineers 7.9 8.8 10.7 10.4 11.1 11.0 3.1 -0.5

aFederally Funded Research and Development Centers.

19

Page 52: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL

WC's em-s in 1971.It level inurged, andin Federal

The primary function of FFRDC's is R&Dperformance or management. It is, therefore,not surprising that virtually all scientists and en-gineers are engaged in R&D work.

The distribution of scientists among broadfields of employment in FFRDC's differed con-siderably from universities and colleges. Thelarge numbers of engineers and physical scien-tists employed at FFRDC's reflect the closeassociation between their R&D activities and themissions of their sponsoring agencies. Nearlytwo-thirds the research professionals at DOD-and NASA-sponsored FFRDC's were engineerswhile physical scientists comprised one-half theresearch staff at AEC-sponsored centers.

neers employed in universityadministered FFRDC's ,aployment status, selected years, 1958.71

March1958

March1961

January1965

January1967

January1969

January1971

Compound

annual

rate o change

1958-69 1969.71

(Thoutands) (Percent)8.5 8.9 11.0 10.7 11.5 11.3 2.8 -0.78.3 8.7 10.8 10.5 11.2 11.0 2.7 -0.6

.2 .2 .2 .2 .3 .3 5.1 -3.68.4 8.8 10.9 10.6 11.3 11.2 2.7 -0.67.9 8.8 10.7 10.4 11.1 11.0 3.1 -0.5

Employment of scientists and engineers at univer-sity- administered FFRDC's, by sponsoring Federalagency and field of employment, 1971

(Percent)

25 50 75 100

Totalnumber

TOTAL

Atomic EnergyCommission

Deportmentof Defense

NationalAeronautics

and SpaceAdministration

NationalSeism

Foundation

Deportmentof Health,

Education andWefts.

Other'

MathematiciansPhysical scientists

*Other scientists include psychologists. life and social scientists.SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Teble 0.1.)

11,340

6.190

2,140

1,700

350

270

Page 53: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Graduate Students

FFRDC's supported by the AEC employedover one-half the graduate students employed inall such centers, and nine-tenths of those work-ing in the physical sciences. This graduate stu-dent employment is heavily concentrated in twoFFRDC's - Lawrence Radiation Laboratory andAmes Laboratory. The 10 Centers sponsored bythe U.S. Office of Education (OE) employedvirtually all of their graduate students on pro-jects requiring psychologists or social scientists.

Technicians

Large numbers of technicians are employedby FFRDC's to support their professional staff.Nearly all were primarily engaged in researchand development and 83 percent were employedby FFRDC's supported by the Atomic EnergyCommission. The four largest AEC laboratoriesaccounted for 71 percent of the FFRDC total.Most of the technicians are classified in engineer-ing fields although employed by FFRDC's whichprimarily perform research in the physical sci-ences.

Technicians employed in university-administeredFFROC's, 1971

Total: 8,240

SOURCE: National ixience Foundation

20

as

9%

83%

{HE W

NASANSF

000

AEC

Page 54: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Section 2. FINANCING OF SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIESCurr6nt R&D Expenditures

University-administered FFRDC's expendedS900 million in 1970 for current R&D per-formance and capital outlays. Although theseorganizations provide research opportunities forfaculty and students, they do not conduct in-structional programs in the sciences and engi-neering as defined for survey purposes.

R&D expenditures in university-administeredFFRDC's increased from S121 million in 1953to S737 million in 1970, an annual rate of11 percent. Since 1964. however, growth hasslowed to an annual rate of 3 percn.

In recent years the R&D effort at FFRDC'shas shifted slightly towards more developmentand less basic research. A significant shift frombasic and applied research to development oc-curred at Lincoln Laboratories when their solid-state physics and computer science research oe-came more problem-oriented rather than un-structured.

Current R&D expenditure: =+ university- administeredFFRDC's, by character of work

(Million)

800

600

400

200

Development

o..

..

/ /Applied ttseatch/.......

.0

......................

.........//.. ............

... .. Basic research

1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 196$ 1970

SOURCE: National Science FoundatIon (Appencisa Table 0.3)

Distribution of current R&D expenditures inuniversity-administered FFRDC's' by character ofwork and sponsoring Federal agency, 1970

Sr:7 (Millions of dollars)

253

216

S465

1 1 1

159

S131

94

0 Development

Applied research

0 Basic research

S104

S26 S10

Tote, MC DOD NASA NSF HEW

Rtderalty Funded Research and Development Centers.bincludes $2.7 million in nonfederal funds.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Apoendi Table 04)

University-administered FFRDC's sponsoredby the AEC alone supported 63 percent of allcurrent R&D expenditures and 73 percent of allbasic research expenditures. DOD ranked secondwith 18 percent of the total and 37 percent ofall development support. FFRDC's sponsoredby the National Science Foundation (NSF) allo-cated all of their expenditures to basic research.These organizations, therefore, accounted for 10percent of basic research expenditures comparedwith only 4 percent of total R&D expenditures.

Nearly three-fourths of all FFRDC research issupported by AEC and is performed in thephyskal and environmental sciences. Centassupported by DOD and NASA are heavily en-gaged in R&D projects involving precision en-gineering and advanced engineering applications.

Page 55: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

G OF SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES

C's expendednt R&D per-!though these

portunities for)t conduct in-ices and engi-poses.

administeredillion in 1953nnual rate ofr, growth hasrcent.

t at FFRDC'sdevelopment

ant shift fromvelopment oc-ien their solid -:e research be-tiler than un-

ty-administered

1966 1968 1970

able D-3)

Distribution of current R&D expenditures inuniversity-administered FFRDC's,a by character ofwork and sponsoring Federal agency, 1970

S 737 (Millions of dollars)

253

216

$ 465

III

159

S 131

94

307

Oevelopment

Applied research

0 Basic research

510446 23

S 26 S10

Totalb AEC 000 NASA NSF

'Federally Funded Research and Development Centers.blncludes 52.7 million in non Federal funds.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 0.4)

HEW

University-administered FFRDC's sponsoredby the AEC alone supported 63 percent of allcurrent R&D expenditures and 73 percent of allbasic research expenditures. DOD ranked secondwith 18 percent of the total and 37 percent ofall development support. FFRDC's sponsoredby the National Science Foundation (NSF) allo-cated all of their expenditures to basic research.These organizations, therefore, accounted for 10percent of basic research expenditures comparedwith only 4 percent of total R&D expenditures.

Nearly three-fourths of all FFRDC research issupported by AEC and is performed in thephysical and environmental sciences. Centerssupported by DOD and NASA are heavily en-gaged in R&D projects involving precision en-gineering and advanced engineering applications.

21

Basic and applied research expenditures ofuniversity-administered FFRDC's, by sponsoringagency and field of science, 1970

TOTAL

Atomic EnergyCommission

NationalAeronautics

and SpaceAdministration

Departmentof Defense

NationalScience

Foundation

Departmentof Health.

Education andWelfare'

0 25

(Percent)

50 75

Other sciencesMathematics

Environmental sciencesLife sciences--

Physical sciences Engineering

100

aRepresents OE-sponsored centers conducting research in education whichcuts across all fields of science.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation (Appendix Table 0.4)

HEW's OE supports 10 small FFRDC's whichbring research and development to bear uponeducational practice and thus improve existingmethods of instruction.

Page 56: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

A. Technical notes and tables

B. Universities and colleges (part I):Statistical tables and reproduction ofsurvey form (including aggregate data)

C. Medical Schools: Listing, statistical tables,and reproduction of survey form(including aggregate data)

D. FFRDC's (part II): Listing, statistical tables,and reproduction of survey forms(including aggregate data)

E. Covering letter and instructions

22

1

Page 57: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Appendix A

Technical Notes

Scope and Coverage

This report is based on the National Science Foundation's(NSF's) "Survey of Scientific Activities of Institutions of HigherEchication, 1971," the fourth in a series of biennial surveysinaugurated in 1964.' Survey questionnaires were mailed out inDecember 1970 to about 2,400 institutions of higher education,all those in the United States and U.S. possessions thought tohave programs in the sciences and engineering. About 300 smallschools specializmg in art, music. theology, and other nonsci-entific fields were excluded, and a further 100 were deletedfrom the survey universe during the datacollection period, bring-ing the final total to 2,198 (appendix table Al).

'Data obtained in earlier surveys in the series have beenpublished by NSF in Scientific Activities at Universities andColleges. 1964 (NSF 68.22), 1968. and Resources for ScientificActivities at Universities and Colleges, 1969 (NSF 70-16), 1970(Washington, D.C. 20402: Supt. of Documents, U.S. Govern-ment Printing Office). No separate report was issued on the 1966survey. however, results of that survey are included in summaryform in the report on the 1969 survey. Data collected in thethree surveys conducted prior to the inception of the presentseries have been published in NSF's Scientific Research andDevelopment in Colleges and UniversitiesExpenditures andManpower, 1953.54, 1958; Scientific Research and Develop.meta in Colleges and UniversitiesExpenditures and Manpower,1958, 1963; and Scientists and Engineers in Colleges andUniversities, 1961, 1965.

Followup queries were mailed out to the smaller nonrespondents in March and May of 1971; telephone contact was main-tained with the 200 institutions believed on the basis of priorsurveys to have spent the largest amounts on research and de-velopment from current funds. By the closeout date of July 15,usable replies had been received from 1.577 universities andcolleges, or 72 percent of the universe (appendix table A-2).

Because of the intensive followup procedures employed withthe larger universities, the figures are believed to be more accu-rate than the 28 percent nonresponse rate would indicate. MostOf the nonrespondents were Smaller institutions in ternis of science and engineering expenditures as is shown in the followingtabulation:

Top 100 institutions 95 respondentsSecond 100 institutions 92 respondentsTop 200 institutions 187 respondents (93.5%)All other institutions 1,390 respondents (69.6%)

These 200 largest institutions in ternis of science activitiesaccount for 95 percent of all R&D expenditures, 62 percentof the scientists and engineers employed, and 91 percent of allgraduate students receiving compensation for part-time servicesas scientists and engineers.

Methods of Estimating for Nonresponse

Estimates for the 621 institutions which failed to returncompleted questionnaires were based on three types of sources:first, other surveys, such as the Higher Education General In-formation Survey, conducted annually by the National Centerfor Educational Statistics of the U.S. Office of Education andthe American Council on Education's quadrennial publica-tion, American Universities and Colleges': second, institutionalsources such as catalogs, treasurer's reports, and similar publica-tions; and third, the completed questionnaires of the individualinstitutions for earlier surveys in the series.

Totals from these sources were distributed by field, func-tion, etc., by computer, using summary distributions taken fromrespondent institutions of each type. The same system was usedin those cases where institutions reported total values for partic-ular items but were unable to give detailed breakdowns.

In some cases. institutions were able to complete someitems on the questionnaire but unable to fill out others. To esti-mate for these, a system of ratios between key variables was de-

2Otis A. Singletary. American Universities and Colleges,10th Edition (Washington, D.C. 20036; American Council onEducation, 1968).

23

visedscien

instrimateratio

Non

CUMties :R&Iresea

leges

milliresea

indir

Iibudg

"curseam

mateaddeof sclishebudgof in

Lim

S

of hcntiiare imustsponsurvtWill

1

tion1/4

pret:certamadpublbe aSinnmag

tionmottheir

Page 58: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

idation'sit Higher

surveys

ed out inlocation,ought to,U0 smallr nonsci-i deletedid. bring-

ve I 'ennes and(tend*',). 1970c;overnhe 1966ummaryd in the

presenttelt andties andOevelop.npower.ves and

Followup queries were mailed out to the smaller nonrespond-ents in March and May of 1971; telephone contact was main-tained with the 200 institutions believed on the basis of priorsurveys to have spent the largest amounts on research and de-velopment from current funds. By the closeout date of July 15,usable replies had been received front 1.377 universities andcolleges, or 72 percent of the universe (appendix table A-2).

Because of the intensive followup procedures employed withthe larger universities, the figures are believed to be more accu-rate than the 28 percent nonresponse rate would indicate. Mostof the nonrespondents were smaller institutions in terms of sci-ence and engineering expenditures as is shown in the followingtabulation:

Top 100 institutions 95 respondentsSecond 100 institutions 92 respondentsTop 200 institutions 187 respondents (93.5%)All other institutions 1,390 respondents (69.6%)

These 200 largest institutions in terms of science activitiesaccount for 95 percent of all R&D expenditures. 62 percentof the scientists and engineers employed, and 91 percent of allgraduate students receiving compensation for part-time servicesas scientists and engineers.

Methods of Estimating for Nonresponse

Estimates for the 621 institutions which failed to returncompleted questionnaires were based on three types of sources:first, other surveys, such as the Higher Education General In-formation Survey, conducted annually by the National Centerfor Educational Statistics of the U.S. Office of Education andthe American Council on Education's quadrennial publica-tion, American Universities and Colleges': second, institutionalsources such as catalogs, treasurer's reports, and similar publica-tions; and third, the completed questionnaires of the individualinstitutions for earlier surveys in the series.

Totals from these sources were distributed by field, func-tion, etc., by computer, using summary distributions taken fromrespondent institutions of each type. The same system was usedin those cases where institutions reported total values for partic-ular items but were unable to give detailed breakdowns.

In some cases, institutions were able to complete someitems on the questionnaire but unable to fill out others. To esti-mate for these, a system of ratios between key variables was de-

'Otis A. Singletary, American Universities and Colleges.10th Edition (Washington, D.C. 20036; American Council onEducation, 1968).

23

med. For example. if an institution reported the number ofscientists and engineers, but was unable to give a figure forinstruction and departmental research, the latter figure was esti-mated on the basis of teaching full-time equivalents (FTE's), atratios which varied according to the type of institutions.

Nonseparately Budgeted R&D Expenditures

The figures published in the body of this report refer to allcurrent expenditures for research and development in universi-ties and colleges. Of the S2.9 billion total. separately budgetedR&D expenditures amountcd to S2.4 billion, and departmentalresearch and other R&D activities for which universities and col-leges do not maintain separate records were estimated at 5500million. This amount includes funds allocated to departmentalresearch by the various academic departments, as well as someindirect costs associated with R&D performance (cost-sharing).

In order to convert "current expenditures for separatelybudgeted research" into "total current R&D expenditures" and"current expenditures for instruction and departmental re-

search" into "current expenditures for instruction," an esti-mated $500 million was subtracted from the latter figure andadded to the former. This 5500 million was distributed by fieldof science, character of work and cost item based on ratios estab-lished in this survey and earlier surveys. All nonscparatclybudgeted research and development was considered to be partof institutions' own funds.

Limitations

Since the universe for the survey consisted of all institutionsof higher education known or believed to have engaged in sci-entific or engineering activities, the data presented in this reportare not subject to a sampling error. However, sonic limitationsmust be taken into account stemming from unevenness of re-sponse rate, lack of agreement among respondents concerningsurvey definitions, and the inadequacy of accounting proceduresutilized by some institutions.

The lack of agreement on the interpretation of survey defini-tions is perhaps the source of the major limitation to the inter-pretation of survey data, followed by the difficulty of measuringcertain aspects of scientific and engineering activities. Estimatesmade by NSF staff members, being based where possible on thepublished records of the institutions in question. arc believed tobe accurate within a margin of 5 percent at aggregate levels.Similarly, as the biennial survey series closes its fourth cycle. themagnitude of the error attributable to the inadequacy of institu-tional recordkeeping procedures is constantly decreasing asmore and more institutions, especially the larger ones, revisetheir procedures to yeild the information requested.

Page 59: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le A

1. N

umbe

i of u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges

incl

uded

in th

e su

rvey

of s

cien

tific

and

engi

neer

ing

activ

ities

of i

nstit

utio

ns o

f hig

her

educ

atio

n, b

y S

tate

and

type

of i

nstit

utio

n, 1

971a

Div

isio

n an

d S

tate

Tot

alIn

stitu

tions

gra

ntin

gD

octo

rate

Mas

ter's

Bac

helo

r'sN

o sc

ienc

ede

gree

Tot

alb

Med

ical

scho

olsb

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

Tot

al2,

198

252

105

287

726

933

New

Eng

land

182

238

oo60

77

Mai

ne15

12

75

New

Ham

pshi

re15

21

18

4

Ver

mon

t16

11

25

8

Mas

sach

uset

ts88

123

1028

38

Rho

de Is

land

103

11

74

Con

nect

icut

38-

42

610

18

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

331

5221

6110

910

9

New

Yor

k17

232

1233

4364

New

Jer

sey

436

27

1218

Pen

nsyl

vani

a11

614

721

5427

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al33

539

1535

132

129

Ohi

o72

114

835

18

Indi

ana

395

16

253

Illin

ois

102

125

930

51

Mic

higa

n72

73

721

37

Wis

cons

in50

42

521

20

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al24

817

1124

104

103

Min

neso

ta45

11

812

24

Iow

a45

21

226

15

Mis

sour

i56

44

522

25

Nor

th D

akot

a12

21

55

Sou

th D

akot

a15

31

102

Neb

rask

a27

32

511

8

Kan

sas

482

14

1824

Sou

th A

tlant

ic37

331

1729

133

180

Del

awar

e5

11

3

Mar

ylan

d39

22

115

21

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

155

31

36

Virg

inia

484

27

1621

Wes

t Virg

inia

211

11

154

Nor

th C

arol

ina

934

36

3251

Sou

th C

arol

ina

393

13

1815

Geo

rgia

546

24

2123

Flo

rida

'59

53

612

36

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al17

114

722

6372

Ken

tuck

y28

22

514

7

Ten

ness

ee53

63

724

16

Ala

bam

a48

31

815

22

Mis

siss

ippi

423

12

1027

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al19

128

1034

5475

Ark

ansa

s18

11

311

3

Loui

sian

a24

52

77

5

Okl

ahom

a33

21

512

14

Tex

as11

620

619

2453 44

Page 60: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Illin

ois

Mic

higa

nW

isco

nsin

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

alM

inne

sota

Iow

aM

isso

uri

Nor

th D

akot

aS

outh

Dak

ota

Neb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sou

th A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

Mar

ylan

dD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

aV

irgin

iaW

est V

irgin

iaN

orth

Car

olin

aS

outh

Car

olin

aG

eorg

iaF

lorid

a

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

Ala

bam

aM

issi

ssip

pi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

alA

rkan

sas

Loui

sian

aO

klah

oma

-.

Tex

as

Mou

ntai

nM

onta

naId

aho

Wyo

min

gC

olor

ado

New

Mex

ico

Ariz

ona

Uta

hN

evad

a

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

iO

utly

ing

area

s

102

125

930

51

727

37

2137

504

25

2120

248

1711

2410

410

345

11

812

24

452

12

2615

564

45

2225

122

15

5

153

110

2

273

25

118

482

14

1824

373

3117

2913

318

0

51

13

392

21

1521

155

31

36

484

27

1621

211

11

154

934

36

3251

393

13

1815

546

24

2123

595

36

1236

171

147

2263

72

282

25

147

536

37

2416

483

18

1522

423

12

1027

191

2810

3454

75

181

13

113

245

27

75

332

15

1214

116

206

1924

53

9718

411

2444

122

16

3

101

14

4

71

628

51

36

14

123

13

42

152

11

210

103

11

24

31

11

260

2711

4942

142

372

110

322

335

17

615

182

188

3230

102

31

11

51

12

2

103

15

°Exc

lude

s ab

out 3

50 in

depe

nden

t sch

ools

of m

usic

, art

, the

olog

y, la

w, a

nd o

ther

spec

ializ

ed in

stitu

tions

that

do

not c

ondu

ct s

cien

ce o

r en

gine

erin

g pr

ogra

ms.

Als

oex

clud

es 3

6 un

iver

sity

adm

inis

tere

d F

FR

DC

's. w

hich

are

list

ed in

app

endi

x D

.

bihe

num

ber

of d

,cto

rate

gran

ting

inst

itutio

ns s

how

n he

re m

ay d

iffer

from

Sim

ilar

figur

es p

ublis

hed

else

whe

re fo

r th

e fo

llow

ing

prin

cipa

l rea

sons

: (1)

Lac

k of

unifo

rmity

in c

lass

ifyin

g br

anch

es, a

ffilia

tes,

or

othe

r or

gani

zatio

nal c

ompo

nent

s

I

I

of u

nive

rsity

sys

tem

s: (

2) d

iffer

ing

defin

e io

ns o

f sci

ence

and

eng

inee

ring

field

s:an

d (3

) va

riatio

ns in

the

times

pan

cove

red

by th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

(e.g

. sin

gle

year

or

long

er p

erio

d).

cInc

lude

s th

ree

inst

itutio

ns g

rant

ing

M.D

. deg

rees

that

do

not g

rant

Ph.

D. o

r S

c.D

.de

gree

s in

the

scie

nces

or

engi

neer

ing.

How

ever

, the

y ar

e in

clud

ed a

s do

ctor

ate

gran

ting

inst

itutio

ns fo

r th

e pu

rpos

e of

trea

ting

all m

edic

al s

choo

ls u

nifo

rmly

.

Page 61: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Table A2. Number of universities and colleges included in thesurvey of scientific activities of institutions of higher educationand number that responded, by type of institution, 1971

Type of institution

Number ofsurveyed

universitiesand colleges

Respon dents

Number Percentof total

Total 2,198 1.577 71.7Doctorate 252 218 86.5

Medical schools . . . 105 96 91.4Master's 287 238 82.9Bachelor's 726 525 72.3No science degree. . . . 933 596 63.9

Table A3. Percent estimated for nonrespondents in scientific and engineering activitiesat universities and colleges, by type of institution, 1970 and January 1971a

(Percent)

ItemAll

universitiesand

colleges

Institutions granting -Doctorate

Master's Bachelor'sTotal Medicalschools

Employment characteristics, January 1971:Scientists and engineers, total 20.8 18.5 18.0 17.2 26.4

Full-time scientists and engineers 19.7 17.4 16.4 16.4 25.5Part-time scientists and engineers 25.5 23.7 21.8 21.6 31.6Graduate studentsb 12.2 12.1 25.2 14.7 (c)

Technicians 33.7 34.2 41.7 21.3 37.1Financial characteristics, 1970:

Separately budgeted R&D expenditures 9.4 9.2 13.1 12.5 19.8Federally financed separately budgeted R&D expendi

turOS 8.9 8.6 14.4 18.9 28.8Instruction and departmental research expenditures . . . 24.6 18,8 26.4 28.0 42.8Total capital expenditures 10,0 8.1 8.1 10.2 16.0Federally financed capital expenditures' 8.8 7.8 12.8 6.4 11.8

aValues were imputed to allow for nonresponse. For example, the imPined dollar volume of separately budgeted R&D expenditures ofnonrespondent institutions amounted to $58 million, or 2.7 percentof the $2.1 billion universe total for all universities and colleges, bothrespondents and nonrespondents.

.1 - 3

25

Nosciencedegree

30.730.830.5

(c)

29.0

24.9

36.644.425.030.3

bIncludes only those graduate students receiving stipends for part-timeservices as scientists and engineers.

`Not applicable.

Page 62: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Appendix BStatistical Tables

Universities and colleges (Part I)

Scientific and Engineering Personnel 13 -14. Numbtion Iin uniary 19

13-15. Gradu

SCIENTISS AND ENGINEERS:timeties a

13-1. Number of scientists and engineers employed in uni- 1971

versifies and colleges, by type of institution and em-ployment status, January 1965. 1967, 1969. and TECIINICIA1971 27

B-2. Number of scientists and engineers employed in 8.1 6. Numluniversities and colleges, by field and employment engin

status, January 1965, 1967, 1969, and 1971 27 in wh

13-3. Number of scientists and engineers employed in and

universities and colleges, by field of employment, 13-17. Nu ml

January 1965. 1967, 1969. and 1971 28 cngin

13-4. Number of scientists and engineers employed in fund

universities and colleges, by function in which pri- 1971

marily employed, type of institution, and field ofemployment, January 1971 28

13-5. Number of scientists and engineers employed in Financinguniversities and colleges, by detailed field of em-ployment and type of institution, January 1971 , . . 29 Financing o

13-6. Number of scientists and engineers employed in 13-18. Selo

universities and colleges, by type of institution, level pond

of educational attainment, and field of employment, tion

January 1971 29 and

8-7. Number of scientists and engineers employed in 13-19. Curr

universities and colleges, by State. January 1965, opm

1967, 1969, and 1971 30 ing i

13-8. Number of scientists and engineers employed in ture

universities and colleges, by State and field of em- 197(

ployment, January 1971 31 13-20. Curr

B-9. Number of scientists and engineers employed in instr

universities and colleges, by State and level of edu- VerSI

cational attainment. January 1971 32 of st.

8 -10. ITE scientists and engineers employed in universi-ties and colleges, by State and function, January CURRENT1971 33

GRADUATE STUDENTS:

13-11. Graduate students receiving compensation for part-time services as scientists and engineers in universi-ties and colleges, by field of employment and func-tion, January 1965, 1967, 1969, and 1971

13-12. Number of graduate students receiving compensa-tion for part-time services as scientists or engineersin universities and colleges, by function, type ofinstitution, and field, January 1971

B-13. Number of graduate students receiving compensa-tion for part-time services as scientists or engineersin universities and colleges, by State, January 1965,1967, 1969, and 1971

26

34

34

35

13-21. Currin

195

11-22. Currin u195

13-23. Currowneted

13-24. Curin utyp

13-25. Curin ufun

Page 63: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Scientific and Engineering Personnel

SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS:

BI. Number of scientists and engineers employed in uni-versities and colleges, by type of institu tion and em-ployment status, January 1965, 1967, 1969. and1971

13-1. Number of scientists and engineers employed inuniversities and colleges, by field and employmentstatus. January 1965, 1967, 1969. and 1971

B-3. Number of scientists and engineers employed inuniversities and colleges, by field of employment,January 1965, 1967, 1969. and 1971

B-4. Number of scientists and engineers employed inuniversities and colleges, by function in which pri-marily employed, type of institution. and field ofemployment, January 1971

B-5. Number of scientists and engineers employed inuniversities and colleges, by detailed field of em-ployment and type of institution, January 1971. .

B-6. Number of scientists and engineers employed inuniversities and colleges, by type of institution, levelof educational attainment, and field of employmentMnuary 1971

13-7. Number of scientists and engineers employed inuniversities and colleges, by State, January 1965.1967. 1969, and 1971

B-8. Number of scientists and engineers employed inuniversities and colleges, by State and field of em-ployment, January 1971

B-9. Number of scientists and engineers employed inuniversities and colleges, by State and level of edu-cational attainment, January 1971

B10. FIE scientists and engineers employed in universi-ties and colleges, by State and function, January1971

GRADUATE STUDENTS:

B -I 1. Graduate students receiving compensation for part-time services as scientists and engineers in universi-ties and colleges, by field of employment and func-tion, January 1965, 1967, 1969, and 1971

B-12. Number of graduate students receiving compensa-tion for part-time services as scientists or engineersin universities and colleges, by function, type ofinstitution, and field, January 1971

13-13. Number of graduate students receiving compensa-tion for part-time services as scientists or engineersin universities and colleges, by State, January 1965,1967,1969,and

26

27

27

28

28

29

29

30

31

32

33

34

34

35

B-I4. Number of graduate students receiving compensa-tion for parttime services as scientists or engineersin universities and colleges, by State and field. Janu-ary 1971

B-I 5. Graduate students receiving compensation for part-time services as scientists or engineers in universi-ties and colleges. by State and function. January1971

TECHNICIANS:

36

37

B-16. Number of technicians employed in the sciences andengineering in universities and colleges, by functionin which primarily employed, field of employment,and type of institution, January 1971 38

B-I 7. Number of technicians employed in the sciences andengineering in universities and colleges, by State andfunction in which primarily employed, January1971 39

Financing of Scientific Activities

Financing of Scientific Activities13-18. Selected characteristics of current and capital ex

penditures for research, development, and instruc-tion in the sciences and engineering in universitiesand colleges, 1964, 1966. 1968, and 1970

13-19. Current and capital expenditures for recearch, devel-opment, and instruction in the sciences and engineer-ing in universities and colleges, by type of expendi-ture and type of control, 1964, 191.6. 1968, and1970

B-20. Current and capital expenditures for research andinstruction in the sciences and engineering in uni-versities and colleges, by type of expenditure, fieldof science. and type of control. 1970

CURRENT R&D EXPENDITURES:

B-2l. Current expenditures for research and developmentin universities and collet:tn, by source of funds,1953-70

B-22. Current expenditures for research and developmentin universities and colleges, by character of work,1953.70

B-23. Current expenditures from universities' and colleges'own funds for separately and nonsep.trately budg-eted R&D, 1953.70

B-24. Current expenditures for research and developmentin universities and colleges, by source of funds andtype of institution, 1970

B-25. Current expenditures for research and developmentin universities and colleges, by State and source offunds, 1970

40

40

41

41

42

42

42

43

Page 64: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

13-26. Current expenditures for research and developmentin universities and colleges. by State. 1964. 1966.1968. and 1970 44

11.27. Federally financed current expenditures Cortese:itchand development in universities and colleges. byState. 1964. 1966. 1968, and 1970 45

6-28. Current expenditures for research in universities andcolleges. by field of science and source of funds.1964. 1966. 1968, and 1970 46

13.29. Current expenditures for research in universities andcolleges, by field of science. source of funds, andtype of institution, 1970 46

8-30. Current expenditures for research in universities andcolleges. by State and field of science, I 970 47

CURRENT EXPENDITURES FOR INSTRUCTION:

13-31. Current expenditures for instruction in the sciencesand engineering in universities and colleges. by Stateand field of science. 1970

8-32. Current expenditures for instruction in the sciencesand engineering in universities and colleges, by fieldof science and type a institution, 1970

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:

13.33. Capital expenditures for research. development. andinstruction in the sciences and engineering in univer-sities and colleges. by type of institution, source of

48

49

funds, and purpose, 1970 498-34. Capital expenditures for research, development, and

instruction in the sciences and engineering in univershies and colleges, by State, source of funds, andpurpose, 1970 50

13-35. Capital expenditures for research, development, andinstruction in the sciences and engineering in universities and Colleges, by State, and source of funds.1964, 1966. 1968, and 1970 51

8-36. Capital expenditures for research, development, andinstruction in the sciences and engineering in univer-sities and colleges, by field of science and type ofinstitution. 1970 52

13-37. Percent distribution of selected financial. employ-ment, and educational characteristics of scientificand engineering activities of universities and col-loges, by institutional group ranked on the basis ofR&D expenditures, 1970 52

Table B1. Number of scientists and engineers employed in univeof institution and employment status, January 1965, 19

Type of restitution and employment status1965

Total 178.904Full time 142,713Part time 36,191

Doctorate 118,233Full time 94,570Part time 23,663

Master's 21,078Full time 17,434Part time 3,644

Bachelor's 22,423Full time 18,673Part time 3,750

No science degree 17,170Full time 12,036Part time 5,134

1

21

17

4

14

11

2

2

1

°Type of institutions classifies institutions grouped by h ghest science or envis used throughout the appendix tables.

Table B.2. Number of scientists and engineers employed in univeand employment status, January 1965, 1967, 196

Field and employment status1965

Total 178,904Full time 142,713Part time 36,191

Engineers 21,681Full time 18,117Part time 3,564

Physical scientists 25,485Full time 22,826Part time 2,659

Mathematicians 13,680Fut! time 10,998Part time 2,682

Life scientists 75,775Full time 57,135Part time 18,640

Psychologists 9,430Full time 6,929Part time 2,501

Social scientists 32,853Full time 26,708Part time 6,145

27

1

21'17

4

2

31

17

1

87

662

11

3

Page 65: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

and developmentIle. 1964. 1966.

Mures for researchand colleges, by

in universities andsource of funds

in universities andrce of funds, and

in universities andcc, 1970

RUCTION:

on in the sciencescolleges. by State

iin in the sciencescolleges. by field970

development, andneering in univer-tuition. source of

development. andsteering in univer-ce of funds, and

levelopment. andseering in univer-source of funds,

levelopment, andleering in univer-ice and type of

nancial, employ-tics of scientific'ersities and col-d on the basis of

44

Table 81. Number of scientists and engineers employed in universities and colleges, by typeof institution and employment status, January 1965, 1967, 1969, and 1971

JanuaryType of institution and employment status196 5 1967 1969 1971

45 Total 178,904 212,855 246,183 273,775Full time 142,713 170,557 199,630 223,055Part time 36,191 42,298 46,553 50,720

46 Doctorate 118,233 142,676 159,007 176,372Full time 94,570 114,445 128,672 144,946Part time 23,663 28,230 30,335 31,42646

Master's 21,078 24,729 33,211 33,89747 Full time 17,434 20,748 28,595 28,991

Part time 3,644 3,981 4,616 4,906Bachelor's 22,423 23,025 24,808 26,665

Full time 18,673 19,328 20,731 22,732Part time 3,750 3,697 4,077 3,933

No science degree 17,170 22,425 29,157 36,84148 Full time 12,036 16,035 21,632 26,386

Part time 5,134 6,390 7,525 10,455

49 aType of institutions classifies institutions grouped by h ghest science or engineering degrees awarded. This termis used throughout the appendix tables.

Table 82. Number of scientists and engineers employed in universities and colleges, by fieldand employment status, January 1965, 1967,1969 and 1971

49 Field and employment status January

1965 1967 1969 1971Total 178,904 212,855 246,183 273,775

Full time 142,713 170,557 199,630 223,05550 Part time 36,191 42,298 46,553 50,720

Engineers 21,681 25,253 25,387 27,130Full time 18,117 20,983 21,431 23,039Part time 3,564 4,270 3,956 4,09151

25,485 31,354 33,698 35,943Physical scientistsFull time 22,826 27,655 29,975 32,098Part time 2,659 3,699 3,723 3,845

52 Mathematicians 13,680 17,776 22,495 24,548Full time 10,998 14,397 18,390 20,282Part time 2,682 3,379 4,105 4,266

Life sc entists 75,775 87,347 97,206 110,274

52 Full timePart time

57,1 3 5

18,64066,62020,727

74,88222,324

85,90724,367

Psychologists 9,430 11,358 14,780 16,806Full time 6,929 8,554 11,536 12,994Part time 2,501 2,804 3,244 3,812

Social scientists 32,853 39,767 52,617 59,074Full time 26,708 32,348 43,416 48,735Part time 6,145 7,419 9,201 10,339

27

Page 66: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le B

. Num

ber

of s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges,

by

field

of e

mpl

oym

ent,

Janu

ary

1965

, 196

7, 1

969,

and

1371

Fie

ld o

f em

ploy

men

tJa

nuar

y

1965

1967

1969

1971

Tot

al17

8,90

421

2,85

524

6,18

327

3,77

5

Eng

inee

rs21

,681

25,2

5325

,387

27,1

30

Aer

onau

tical

1,12

71,

360

1,35

71,

469

Che

mic

al1,

571

1,56

51,

735

1,84

3C

ivil

3,14

53,

660

3,89

44,

129

Ele

ctric

al5,

478

6,56

36,

803

6,88

5M

echa

nica

l4,

108

4,63

84,

812

5,38

7O

ther

eng

inee

rs6,

252

7,46

76,

786

7,41

7

Phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts25

,485

31,3

5433

,698

35,9

43

Che

mis

ts10

,684

12,9

6114

,201

14,6

88

Ear

th s

cien

tists

4,00

55,

111

5,54

96,

500

Phy

sici

sts

9,13

211

,127

11,7

6612

,195

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

1,66

42,

155

2,18

22,

560

Mat

hem

atic

ians

13,6

8017

,776

22,4

9524

,548

Life

sci

entis

ts75

,775

87,3

4797

,206

110,

274

Agr

icul

tura

l13

,507

14,9

5015

,150

18,0

39

Bio

logi

cal

24,2

8127

,419

29,2

5731

,808

Med

ical

37,9

8744

,978

52,7

9960

,427

Psy

chol

ogis

ts9,

430

11,3

5814

,780

16,8

06

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

32,8

5339

,767

52,6

1759

,074

Eco

nom

ists

7,93

29,

662

10,4

0211

,263

Soc

iolo

gist

s6,

261

7,55

89,

451

11,3

23P

oliti

cal s

cien

tists

5,91

97,

190

7,91

98,

938

His

toria

ns(N

A)

(NA

)14

,427

15,8

71

Oth

er s

ocia

l sci

entis

ts12

,741

15,3

5710

,418

11,6

79

Not

e: In

clud

es s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

fu,

time

and

part

tim

e, b

ut e

xclu

des

grad

uate

stu

dent

sre

ceiv

ing

com

pens

atio

n fo

r pa

rttim

e se

rvic

es

Tab

le B

.4. N

umbe

r of

sci

entis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

em

ploy

ed in

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s,by

func

tion

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed, t

ype

of in

stitu

tion,

and

fiel

d of

em

ploy

men

t, Ja

nuar

y 19

71

Fun

ctio

n an

d ty

pe o

f ins

titut

ion

IT

otal

Eng

inee

rsP

hysi

cal

scie

ntis

tsM

athe

mat

icia

nsLi

fesc

ient

ists

Psy

chol

ogis

tsS

ocia

lsc

ient

ists

All

func

tions

, tot

al27

3,77

527

,130

35,9

4324

,548

110,

274

16,8

0659

,074

Doc

tora

te17

6,37

218

,991

20,1

5510

,132

94,2

957,

016

25,7

83

Mas

ter's

33,8

972,

552

6,01

64,

581

5,15

73,

557

12,0

34

Bac

helo

r's26

,665

1,20

84,

740

3,65

24,

061

2,65

810

,346

No

scie

nce

degr

ee36

,841

4,37

95,

032

6,18

36,

761

3,57

510

,911

Tea

chin

g20

0,31

721

,318

28,0

1322

,609

62,4

9014

,460

51.4

27

Doc

tora

te10

7,94

713

,474

12,6

178,

462

47,0

405,

393

20,9

61

Mas

ter's

32,3

412,

433

5,80

94,

474

4,87

93,

354

11,3

92

Bac

helo

r's25

,430

1,16

54,

631

3,58

93,

940

2,52

99,

576

.2 f

a

Page 67: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Phy

sici

sts

..

..

..

.9,

132

11,1

2711

,766

12,1

95O

ther

phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts1,

664

2,15

52,

182

2,56

0

Mat

hem

atic

ians

13,6

8017

,776

22,4

9524

,548

Life

sci

entis

ts75

,775

87,3

4797

,206

110,

274

Agr

icul

tura

l13

,507

14,9

5015

,150

18,0

39B

iolo

gica

l24

,281

27,4

1929

,257

31,8

08M

edic

al37

,987

44,9

7852

,799

60,4

27

Psy

chol

ogis

ts9,

430

11,3

5814

,780

16,8

06

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

32,8

5339

,767

52,6

1759

,074

Eco

nom

ists

7,93

29,

662

10,4

0211

,263

Soc

iolo

gist

s6,

261

7,55

89,

451

11,3

23P

oliti

cal s

cien

tists

5,91

97,

190

7,91

98,

938

His

toria

ns(N

A)

(NA

)14

,427

15,8

71O

ther

soc

ial s

cien

tists

12,7

4115

,357

10,4

1811

,679

Not

e: In

clud

es s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

full

time

and

part

tom

e, b

ut e

xclu

des

grad

uate

stu

dent

sre

ceiv

ing

com

pens

atio

n fo

r pa

rttim

e se

rvic

es.

Tab

le B

4. N

umbe

r of

sci

entis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

em

ploy

ed in

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s,by

func

tion

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed, t

ype

of in

stitu

tion,

and

fiel

d of

em

ploy

men

t. Ja

nua

y 19

71

Fun

ctio

n an

d ty

pe o

f ins

titut

ion

I

Tot

alE

ngin

eers

Phy

sica

lsc

ient

ists

Mat

hem

atic

ians

Life

scie

ntis

tsP

sych

olog

ists

Soc

ial

scie

ntis

ts

All

func

tions

, tot

al27

3,77

527

,130

35,9

4324

,548

110,

274

16,8

0659

,074

Doc

tora

te, 1

76,3

7218

,991

20,1

5510

,132

9429

57,

016

25,7

83

Mas

ter's

33,8

972,

552

6,01

64,

581.

5,15

73,

557

12,0

34

Bac

helo

r's26

,665

1,20

84,

740

3,65

24,

061

2,65

810

,346

No

scie

nce

degr

ee36

,841

4,37

95,

032

6,18

36,

761

3,57

510

,911

Tea

chin

g20

0,31

721

,318

28,0

1322

,609

62,4

9014

,460

51,4

27

Doc

tora

te10

7,94

713

,474

12,6

178,

462

47,0

405,

393

20,9

61

Mas

ter's

32,3

412,

433

5,80

94,

474

4,87

93,

354

11.3

92

Bac

helo

r's25

,430

1,16

54,

631

3,58

93,

940

2,52

99,

576

No

scie

nce

degr

ee34

,599

4,24

64.

956

6,08

46,

631

3,18

49.

498

Res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t48

,544

4,83

97.

314

1.44

630

,433

1,21

33,

299

Doc

tora

te47

,630

4,73

67,

106

1,38

130

,171

1,13

A3,

102

Mas

ter's

585

68.

129

3516

454

135

;.t.a

chel

or's

244

2165

2174

1647

No

scie

nce

degr

ee85

1414

924

915

Oth

er a

ctiv

ities

24,9

1497

361

649

317

,351

1,13

34,

348

Doc

tora

te20

,795

781

432

289

17,0

8448

91,

720

Mas

ter's

971

5178

7211

414

950

7

Bac

helo

r's99

122

4442

4711

372

3

No

scie

nce

degr

ee2,

157

119

6290

106

382

1,39

8

Not

e: In

clud

es s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

full

time

and

part

tom

e, b

ut e

xclu

des

grad

uate

stu

dent

sre

ceiv

ing

com

pens

atio

n fo

r pa

rtto

me

serv

ices

.

Page 68: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le 1

35. N

umbe

r of

sci

entis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

em

ploy

ed in

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s,by

cf.r

aile

d fie

ld o

fem

ploy

men

t and

type

of i

nstit

utio

n, J

anua

ry 1

971

Fie

ld o

f em

ploy

men

tT

otal

Inst

itutio

ns g

rant

ing

-

Doc

tora

teM

aste

r'sB

ache

lor's

No

scie

nce

degr

eeT

otal

273.

775

176.

372

33.8

9726

.665

36,8

41E

ngin

eers

27,1

3018

,991

2,55

21,

208

4,37

9A

eron

autic

al1,

469

1,16

998

8311

9C

hem

ical

1,84

31,

589

104

3811

2C

ivil

4,12

92,

818

447

201

663

Ele

ctric

al6,

885

4,51

866

232

81,

377

Mec

hani

cal

5,38

73,

367

590

320

1,11

0D

ther

eng

inee

rs7,

417

5,53

065

123

899

8P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

35,9

4320

,155

6,01

64,

740

5,03

2C

hem

ists

14,6

887,

391

2.54

82,

480

2,26

9E

arth

sci

entis

ts6,

500

3,99

61,

191

533

780

Phy

sici

sts

12,1

957,

072

1,94

31,

634

1,54

6O

ther

phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts2,

560

1,69

633

493

437

Mat

hem

atic

ians

24.5

4810

,132

4,58

13,

652

6.18

3Li

fe s

cien

ces

110,

274

94,2

955,

157

4,06

1-a

6,76

1A

gric

ultu

ral

18,0

3916

,894

564

124

457

Bio

logi

cal

31,8

0820

.265

3,92

03,

407

4,21

6M

edic

al60

,427

57,1

3667

353

02,

088

Psy

chol

ogis

ts16

,806

7,01

63.

557

2,65

83,

575

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

59,0

7425

,783

12,0

3410

,346

10,9

11E

cono

mis

ts11

,763

5,66

32,

185

1,81

21,

603

Soc

iolo

gist

s11

,323

4,62

52,

366

2,22

92,

103

Pol

itica

l sci

entis

ts8,

938

3,80

12,

074

1,54

21,

521

His

toria

ns15

,871

5.13

43.

817

3,46

73,

453

Dth

er s

ocia

l sci

entis

ts11

,679

6,56

01,

592

1,29

62,

231

Not

e' In

clud

es s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

full

time

and

part

tom

e, b

ut e

xclu

des

grad

uate

stu

dent

sre

ceiv

ing

com

pens

atio

n fo

r pa

rtttm

e se

rvic

es.

Tab

le 1

36. N

umbe

r of

sci

entis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

em

ploy

ed in

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s, b

y ty

pe o

f ins

titut

ion,

leve

l of e

duca

tiona

l atta

inm

ent,

and

field

of e

mpl

oym

ent,

Janu

ary

1971

Typ

e of

inst

itutio

n an

ded

ucat

iona

l am

inm

ent

Tot

alE

ngin

eers

Phy

sica

lsc

ient

ists

Mat

hem

atic

ians

Life

scie

ntis

tsP

sych

olog

ists

Soc

ial

scie

ntis

tsA

ll in

stitu

tiona

l typ

es27

3,77

527

.130

35,9

4324

,548

110,

274

16,8

0659

,074

Ph.

D.

123,

474

13,3

2124

,259

10,2

5236

.022

10,6

2728

,993

M.D

., D

.D.S

.. et

c.46

,529

7213

469

45,6

3921

240

3M

aste

r's78

.939

9,12

29,

100

12,4

2716

,903

5.27

926

,108

Bac

helo

r's24

.833

4,61

52,

450

1,80

011

,710

688

3.57

0D

octo

rate

gran

ting

inst

itutio

ns17

6,37

218

,991

20,1

5510

,132

94,2

957,

016

25,7

83P

h.D

.87

,447

11,6

6516

,034

7,01

629

.780

5,74

917

,203

M.D

., D

.D.S

., et

c.44

,940

5269

1544

,500

120

184

Mas

ter's

27,4

305,

129

2,55

52,

416

9.95

481

66.

560

Bac

helo

r's16

.555

2.14

51,

497

685

10,0

6133

11,

836

Page 69: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Ear

th s

cien

tists

.4.

.P

hysi

cist

sO

ther

phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts.

Mat

hem

atic

ians

Life

sci

ence

s

Agr

icul

tura

lB

iolo

gica

lM

edic

al

Psy

chol

ogis

tsS

ocia

l 'sc

ient

ists

Eco

nom

ists

Soc

iolo

gist

sP

oliti

cal s

cien

tists

His

toria

nsO

ther

soc

ial s

cien

tists

6,50

03,

996

1,19

153

378

012

,195

7.07

21,

943

1,63

41,

546

2,56

01,

696

334

9343

724

,548

10,1

324.

581

3.65

26.

183

110,

274

94.2

955,

157

4.06

16.

761

18,0

3916

,894

564

124

457

31,8

0820

,265

3,92

03,

407

4.21

660

,427

57,1

3667

353

02,

088

16.8

067,

016

3.55

72.

658

3.57

559

,074

25,7

8312

,034

10,3

4610

,911

11,2

635,

663

2,18

51,

812

1,60

311

.323

4,62

52,

366

2.22

92,

103

8,93

83,

801

2,07

41,

542

1,62

115

,871

5,13

43.

817

3,46

73,

453

11.6

796,

560

1,59

21,

296

2,23

1

Not

e. In

clud

es s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

full

time

and

part

time,

I ut

exc

lude

s gr

adua

te s

tude

nts

rece

ivin

g co

mpe

nsat

ion

for

part

time

serv

ices

.

Tab

le 1

36. N

umbe

r of

sci

entis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

em

ploy

ed in

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s, b

y ty

pe o

f ins

titut

ion,

leve

l of e

duca

tiona

l atta

inm

ent,

and

field

of e

mpl

oym

ent,

Janu

ary

1971

Typ

e of

inst

itutio

n an

ded

ucat

iona

l atta

inm

ent

Tot

alE

ngin

eers

Phy

sica

lsc

ient

ists

Mat

hem

atic

ians

Life

scie

ntis

tsP

sych

olog

ists

Soc

ial

scie

ntis

tsA

ll in

stitu

tiona

l typ

es27

3,77

527

,130

35,9

4324

,548

110,

274

16,8

0659

,074

Ph.

D.

123,

474

13,3

2124

,259

10,2

5236

,022

10,6

2728

.993

M.D

., D

.D.S

., et

c.46

,529

7213

469

45.6

3921

240

3M

aste

r's78

,939

9,12

29,

100

12.4

2716

,903

5,27

926

.108

Bac

helo

r's24

,833

4,61

52.

450

1,80

011

,710

688

3.57

0D

octo

rate

gran

ting

inst

itutio

ns17

6,37

218

,991

20,1

5510

,132

94,2

957,

016

25,7

83P

h.D

.87

,447

11,6

6516

,034

7,01

629

,780

5,74

917

,203

M.D

., D

.D.S

., et

c.44

,940

5269

1544

,500

120

184

Mas

ter's

27,4

305,

129

2,55

52.

416

9,95

481

66,

560

Bac

helo

r's16

,555

2,14

51,

497

685

10,0

6133

11,

836

Mas

ter's

gran

ting

inst

itutio

ns33

,897

2,55

26,

016

4,58

15,

157

3,55

712

,034

Ph.

D.

19,3

241.

109

4.26

51,

877

3,32

22,

538

6,21

3M

X)

, D.D

.S.,

etc.

248

911

1914

328

38M

aste

r's12

,469

1.07

41,

450

2,43

01,

353

889

5,27

3B

ache

lor's

1,85

636

029

025

533

910

251

0B

ache

lor's

gran

ting

inst

itutio

ns26

,665

1,20

84,

740

3,65

24,

061

2,65

810

,346

Ph.

D.

11,9

7525

62,

993

1,04

32,

070

1.53

84,

075

M.D

., D

.D.S

., et

c.44

22

2321

264

3010

2M

aste

r's12

,862

645

1,58

22,

435

1,47

095

55.

775

Bac

helo

r's1,

386

305

142

153

257

135

394

Inst

itutio

ns n

ot g

rant

ing

scie

nce

degr

ees

..

..

36,8

414,

379

5,03

26,

183

6,76

13,

575

10,9

11P

h.D

.4,

728

291

967

316

850

802

1.50

2M

.D.,

D.D

.S.,

etc.

899

931

1473

234

79M

aste

r's26

.178

2,27

43,

513

5,14

64,

126

2.61

98.

500

Bac

helo

r's5,

036

1,80

552

170

71,

053

120

830

Not

e: In

clud

es s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

full

time

and

part

tim

e, b

ut e

xc u

des

grad

uate

stu

dent

sre

ceiv

ing

com

pens

atio

n fo

r pa

rttim

e se

rvic

es.

Page 70: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le 1

37.

Num

ber

of s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges,

by

Sta

te,

Janu

ary

1965

, 196

7, 1

969,

and

197

1

Sta

teJa

nuar

y19

6519

6719

6919

71

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l17

8,90

421

2,85

524

6,18

327

3,77

5

New

Eng

land

14,7

4618

,086

20,9

4222

,070

Mai

ne66

662

773

884

1

New

Ham

pshi

re70

780

597

992

7

Ver

mon

t76

686

51,

001

1,05

6

Mas

sach

uset

ts8,

686

11,2

9012

,742

13.1

81

Rho

de Is

land

852

969

1,05

61,

253

Con

nect

icut

3.06

93,

530

4,42

64,

812

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

36,9

4744

,368

51,1

1056

,538

New

Yor

k22

,487

27,1

4729

,674

33.5

77

New

Jer

sey

3,80

04,

262

5.30

86,

047

Pen

nsyl

vani

a10

,660

12,9

5916

,128

16,9

14

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al31

,637

37,9

5243

,723

48,8

75

Ohi

o8,

595

10,5

1411

,567

12,7

68

Indi

ana

3,79

03.

979

4.57

05.

353

Illin

ois

8,35

89,

621

12,1

4212

,926

Mic

higa

n7,

059

8,43

18,

379

9.59

1

Wis

cons

in3,

835

5,40

77,

065

8,23

7

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al13

,641

17,1

2620

,027

23,0

13

Min

neso

ta3,

444

3,86

14,

185

4,94

7

Iow

a2,

127

3,53

04,

290

4,42

8

Mis

sour

i3,

498

4,15

95,

427

6,45

6

Nor

th D

akot

a64

982

390

287

7

Sou

th D

akot

a68

282

177

682

2

Neb

rask

a1,

235

1,38

41,

500

2,25

9

Kan

sas

2,00

62,

548

2,94

53,

224

Sou

th A

tlant

ic24

,784

28,0

6434

,353

37,9

09

Del

awar

e31

732

341

559

6

Mar

ylan

d,

4,84

25,

501

6,63

17,

227

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

2,24

22,

567

3,30

93,

147

Virg

inia

2,81

33,

181

4,05

24,

898

Wes

t Virg

inia

1,17

51,

456

1,68

81,

731

Nor

th C

arol

ina

5,43

25,

257

6,44

26,

823

Sou

th C

arol

ina

1,30

51,

832

2,16

42,

450

GJu

rgia

2,99

03.

556

4,28

05,

111

Flo

rida

3,66

84,

391

5,37

25,

926

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al8,

584

10,1

0511

,708

12,8

93

Ken

tuck

y2,

009

2,36

32,

687

2,84

6

Ten

ness

ee2,

986

3.36

84.

103

4.53

5

Ala

bam

a1,

851

2,28

12,

870

3,21

0

Mis

siss

ippi

1,73

82,

093

2,04

82,

302

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al13

,906

16,4

8719

,238

20.9

63

Ark

ansa

s1,

314

1,60

41,

710

1,89

9

Loui

sian

a3,

117

3,43

53,

904

4,36

3

Okl

ahom

a1,

776

2,26

12,

361

2,40

6

Tex

as7,

699

9,18

711

,263

12,2

95

Mou

ntai

n.

.7,

538

9,00

410

,504

,12

,081

Page 71: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Eas

t Nor

m C

entr

al

Ohi

oIn

dian

aIll

inoi

sM

ichi

gan

Wis

cons

in

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

alM

inne

sota

Iow

aM

isso

uri

Nor

th D

akot

aS

outh

Dal

nta

Neb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sou

th A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

Mar

ylan

dD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

aV

irgin

iaW

est V

irgin

iaN

orth

Car

olin

aS

outh

Car

olin

aG

eorg

iaF

lorid

a

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

Ala

bam

aM

issi

ssip

pi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

alA

rkan

sas

Loui

sian

aO

klah

oma

Tex

as

Mou

ntai

nM

onta

naId

aho

Wyo

min

gC

olor

ado

New

Mex

ico

Ariz

ona

Uta

hN

evad

a

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

i

Out

lyin

g A

reas

ol,t)

.5/

3 /,U

UZ

,13,

/..'3

4o,o

/L,

8,59

510

,514

11,5

6712

,768

3,79

03,

979

4,57

05,

353

8,35

89,

621

12,1

4212

,926

7,05

98,

431

8,37

99,

591

3,83

55,

407

7,06

58,

237

13,6

4117

.126

20,0

2723

,013

3,44

43,

861

4,18

54,

947

2,12

73,

530

4,29

04,

428

3,49

84.

159

5,42

76,

456

649

823

902

877

682

821

778

822

1,23

51,

384

1,50

02,

259

2,00

62,

548

2,94

53,

224

24,7

8428

,064

34,3

5337

,909

317

323

415

596

4,84

25,

501

6,63

17,

227

2,24

22,

567

3,30

93,

147

2,81

33,

181

4,05

24,

898

1,17

51,

456

1,68

81,

731

5,43

25,

257

6,44

26,

823

1,30

51,

832

2,16

42,

450

2,99

03,

556

4,28

05,

111

3,66

84,

391

5,37

25,

926

8,58

410

,105

11,7

0812

,893

2,00

92,

363

2,68

72,

846

2,98

63,

368

4,10

34,

535

1,85

12,

281

2,87

03,

210

1,73

82,

093

2,04

82,

302

13,9

0616

,487

19,2

3820

,963

1,31

41,

604

1,71

01,

899

3,11

73,

435

3,90

44,

363

1,77

62,

261

2,36

12,

406

7,69

99,

187

11,2

6312

,295

7,53

89,

004

10,5

0412

,081

590

650

697

765

634

667

842

897

317

317

404

456

2,12

32,

799

3,58

84,

308

886

1,08

41,

213

1,08

71,

484

1,63

31,

839

2,24

21,

205

1,55

51,

601

1,96

929

929

932

035

7

25,8

5830

,219

32,7

5437

,492

2,88

83,

405

3,93

64,

977

2,72

92,

817

3,20

73,

972

19,5

3423

.010

24,2

8627

,031

211

226

283

284

496

761

1,04

21,

228

1,26

31,

444

1,82

41,

941

Not

e. In

clud

es s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

full

time

and

part

tim

e, b

ut e

xclu

des

grad

uate

stu

dent

sre

ceiv

ing

com

pens

atio

n fo

r pa

rtP

me

serv

ices

Page 72: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le 8

.8. N

umbe

r of

sci

entis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

em

ploy

ed in

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s,by

Sta

te a

nd fi

eld

of e

mpl

oym

ent,

Janu

ary

1971

Sta

teT

otal

Eng

inee

rsP

hysi

cal

scie

ntis

tsM

athe

mat

icia

nsLi

fesc

ient

ists

Psy

chol

ogis

tsS

ocia

lsc

ient

ists

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l27

3,77

527

.130

35.9

4324

,548

110.

274

16.8

0659

.074

New

Eng

land

22,0

702,

977

3,33

91,

725

8,20

51,

323

4,50

1M

aine

841

9013

295

219

5824

7N

ew H

amps

hire

927

9414

483

254

6728

5V

erm

ont

1,05

681

113

7849

459

231

Mas

sach

uset

ts13

,181

2,10

12,

101

931

5,06

269

52,

291

Rho

de Is

land

1.25

316

422

515

031

994

301

Con

nect

icut

4,81

244

762

438

81,

857

350

1,14

6

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

56,5

385,

190

7,24

54,

970

24,0

013,

424

11,7

08N

ew Y

ork

33,5

772,

923

3,98

32,

861

14,8

201,

953

7,03

7N

ew J

erse

y6,

047

773

1,01

075

41,

371

519

1,62

0P

enns

ylva

nia

16,9

141,

494

2,25

21,

355

7,81

095

23,

051

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al48

,875

4,92

06,

316

4,34

519

,985

3,10

410

,205

Ohi

o12

,768

1,20

51,

359

901

6,65

159

72,

055

Indi

ana

5,35

353

283

855

01,

935

352

1,14

6Ill

inoi

s12

,926

1,12

81,

599

1,26

35,

402

885

2,64

9M

ichi

gan

9,59

11,

387

1,28

990

52,

984

735

2,29

1W

isco

nsin

8,23

766

81,

231

726

3,01

353

52,

064

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al23

,013

2,00

22,

729

1,84

79,

336

1,56

95,

530

Min

neso

ta4,

947

307

611

371

1,82

235

01,

486

Iow

a4,

428

467

444

351

1,66

426

81,

234

Mis

sour

i6,

456

568

720

523

3,08

742

7 '

1,13

1N

orth

Dak

ota

877

9311

672

398

5114

7S

outh

Dak

ota

822

109

134

8727

951

162

Neb

rask

a2,

259

171

253

142

967

126

600

Kan

sas

3,22

428

745

130

11,

119

296

770

Sou

th A

tlant

ic37

,909

3,41

24,

365

3,76

416

,055

2,16

08,

153

Del

awar

e59

690

9073

136

5315

4M

aryl

and

7,22

747

675

456

33,

854

412

1,16

8D

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

a3,

147

296

286

350

1,21

619

280

7V

irgin

ia4,

898

601

626

585

1,71

528

31,

088

Wes

t Virg

inia

1,73

115

920

315

773

410

737

1N

orth

Car

olin

a6,

823

431

763

712

2,99

6'3

801,

541

Sou

th C

arol

ina

2,45

027

829

223

494

111

758

8G

eorg

ia5,

111

443

624

465

2,08

827

21,

219

Flo

rida

-5,

926

638

727

625

2,37

534

41,

217

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al12

,893

1,17

41,

494

1,21

75,

432

746

2,83

0K

entu

cky

2,84

615

135

326

01,

236

189

657

Ten

ness

ee4,

535

445

548

437

1,89

127

893

6A

laba

ma

3,21

038

834

831

11,

330

173

660

Mis

siss

ippi

2,30

219

024

520

997

510

657

7

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al20

,963

1,80

02,

690

1,99

79,

085

1,07

94,

312

Ark

ansa

s1,

899

102

164

128

903

7452

8Lo

uisi

ana

4,36

330

148

942

62,

199

162

786

Okl

ahom

a2,

406

215

340

213

954

145

539

Tex

as12

,295

1,18

21,

697

1,23

05,

029

698

2,45

9

Mou

ntai

n12

,081

1,64

92,

026

1,16

53,

549

743

2,94

9M

onta

na76

598

138

9020

543

191

Idah

o89

710

212

685

374

4416

6W

yom

ing

-45

6_77

7659

127

2592

Page 73: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Ohi

o

Indi

ana,

Illin

oisi

Mic

higa

nW

isco

nsin

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

alM

inne

sota

Iow

aM

isso

uri

Nor

th D

akot

aS

outh

Dak

ota

Neb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sou

th A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

Mar

ylan

dD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

aV

irgin

iaW

est V

irgin

iaN

orth

Car

olin

aS

outh

Car

olin

aG

eorg

iaF

lorid

a

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

Ala

bam

a

Mis

siss

ippi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

alA

rkan

sas

Loui

sian

aO

klah

oma

Tex

as

Mou

nta

inM

onta

naId

aho

Wyo

min

gC

olor

ado

New

Mex

ico

Ariz

ona

Uta

hN

evad

a

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

i

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

12,7

681,

205

1,35

990

16,

651

597

2,05

55,

353

532

838

550

1,93

535

21,

146

12,9

261,

128

1,59

91,

263

5,40

288

52,

649

9,59

11,

387

1,28

990

52,

984

735

2,29

18,

237

668

1,23

172

63,

013

535

2,06

423

,013

2,00

22,

729

1,84

79,

336

1,56

95,

530

4,94

730

761

137

11,

822

350

1,48

64,

428

467

444

351

1,66

426

81,

234

6,45

656

872

052

33,

087

427

1,13

187

793

116

7239

851

147

822

109

134

8727

951

162

2,25

917

125

314

296

712

660

03,

224

287

451

301

1,11

929

677

0

37,9

093,

412

4,36

53,

764

16,0

552,

160

8,15

359

690

9073

136

5315

47,

227

476

754

563

3,85

441

21,

168

3,14

729

628

635

01,

216

192

807

4,89

860

162

658

51,

715

283

1,08

81,

731

159

203

157

734

107

371

6,82

343

176

371

22,

996

380

1,54

12,

450

278

292

234

941

117

588

5,11

144

362

446

52,

088

272

1,21

95,

926

638

727

625

2,37

534

41,

217

12,8

931,

174

1,49

41,

217

5,43

274

62,

830

2,84

615

135

326

01,

236

189

657

4,53

544

554

843

71,

891

278

936

3,21

038

834

831

11,

330

173

660

2,30

219

024

520

997

510

657

7

20,9

631,

800

2,69

01,

997

9,08

51,

079

4,31

21,

899

102

164

128

903

7452

84,

363

301

489

426

2,19

916

278

62,

406

215

340

213

954

145

539

12,2

951,

182

1,69

71,

230

5,02

969

82,

459

12,0

811,

649

2,02

61,

165

3,54

974

32,

949

765

9813

890

205

4319

189

710

212

685

374

4416

645

677

7659

127

2592

4,30

862

163

941

01,

104

243

1,29

11,

087

166

205

137

280

6623

32,

242

283

511

205

592

177

474

1,96

926

827

815

372

012

642

435

734

5326

147

1978

37,4

923,

828

5,55

63,

379

13,5

752,

571

8,58

34,

977

486

658

396

2,05

934

51,

033

3,97

219

950

034

41,

941

278

710

27,0

313,

024

4,14

32,

558

8,93

81,

865

6,50

328

431

7320

9014

561,

228

8818

261

547

6928

1

1,94

117

818

313

91,

051

8730

3

Not

e: In

clud

es s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

full

time

and

part

time,

but

exc

lude

s gr

adua

te s

tude

nts

rece

ivin

g co

mpe

nsat

ion

for

part

time

serv

ices

.

Page 74: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le B

9. N

Sm

ber

of s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges,

by S

tate

and

leve

l of e

duca

tiona

l atta

inm

ent,

Janu

ary

1971

Sta

teT

otal

Ph.

IDI

M.D

,D

.D.S

,et

c.

Mas

ter's

Bac

helo

r's

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l27

3,77

512

3,47

446

,529

78,9

3924

,833

New

Eng

land

22,0

7010

,236

3,87

95,

470

2,48

5

Mai

ne84

143

215

318

76

New

Ham

pshi

re92

753

063

270

64

Ver

mon

t1,

056

417

133

327

179

Mas

sach

uset

ts13

,181

5,82

93,

158

2,82

01,

374

Rho

de Is

land

1,25

376

950

358

76

Con

nect

icut

4,81

22,

259

460

1,37

771

6

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

56,5

3823

,296

13,9

9515

,140

4,10

7

New

Yor

k33

,577

13,2

229,

109

8,66

22,

584

New

Jer

sey

6,04

72,

820

389

2,27

756

1

Pen

nsyl

vani

a16

,914

7,25

44,

497

4,20

196

7

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al48

,875

23,7

598,

030

13,6

883,

398

Ohi

o12

,768

6,22

33,

051

2,79

070

4

Indi

ana

5,35

33,

132

648

1,33

024

3

Illin

ois

12,9

266,

080

1,87

93,

816

1,15

1'

Mic

higa

n9,

591

4,31

31,

029

3,49

275

7

Wis

cons

in8,

237

4,01

1 ,

1,42

32,

260

543

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al23

,013

11,2

333,

280

6,53

31,

967

Min

neso

ta4,

947

2,71

433

81,

201

694

Iow

a4,

428

2,11

447

41,

432

,40

8

Mis

sour

i6,

456

2,82

41,

555

1,62

245

5

Nor

th D

akot

a87

737

919

417

62

Sou

th D

akot

a82

242

832

315

47

Neb

rask

a2,

259

1,16

448

651

891

Kan

sas

3,22

41,

610

376

1,02

821

0

Sou

th A

tlant

ic37

,909

15,7

956,

300

11,3

764,

438

Del

awar

e59

637

62

146

72

Mar

ylan

d7,

227

2,30

02,

312

1,86

674

9

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

3,14

71,

405

819

748

175

Virg

inia

4,89

82,

309

744

1,52

032

5

Wes

t Virg

inia

1,73

167

218

559

228

2

Nor

th C

arol

ina

......

..

.6,

823

2,87

980

21,

904

1,23

8

Sou

th C

arol

ina

2,45

01,

056

168

861

365

Geo

rgia

5,11

12,

315

641

1,43

572

0

Flo

rida

5,92

62,

483

627

2,30

451

2

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al12

,893

5,50

72,

063

4,38

194

2

Ken

tuck

y2,

846

1,35

456

684

581

Ten

ness

ee4,

535

2,07

872

11,

256

480

Ala

bam

a3,

210

1,21

754

91,

218

226

Mis

siss

ippi

2,30

285

822

71,

062

155

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al20

,963

9,29

22,

675

6,00

12,

995

Ark

ansa

s1,

899

602

270

732

295

Loui

sian

a4,

363

1,86

384

01,

118

542

Okl

ahom

a2,

406

1,31

630

81

693

89

Tex

as12

,295

5,51

11,

257

3,45

82,

069

19 n

Ri _

fi 70

777

3,66

778

0

Page 75: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

New

Yor

k...

..N

ew J

erse

yPe

nnsy

lvan

ia

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

alO

hio

Indi

ana

Illin

ois

Mic

higa

nW

isco

nsin

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

alM

inne

sota

Iow

aM

isso

uri

Nor

th D

akot

aSo

uth

Dak

ota

Neb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sout

h A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

Mar

ylan

dD

istr

ict o

f C

olum

bia

Vir

gini

aW

est V

irgi

nia

Nor

th C

arol

ina

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Geo

rgia

Flor

ida

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

alK

entu

cky

Ten

ness

ee

Ala

lopm

aM

issi

sipp

iW

est S

outh

Cen

tral

Ark

ansa

sLo

uisi

ana

Okl

ahom

dT

exas

Mou

ntai

nM

onta

nat,

Idah

oW

yom

ing

Col

orad

oN

ew M

exic

oA

rizon

aU

tah

Nev

ada

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

.....

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

i

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

33,5

776,

047

16,9

14

13,2

222,

820

-7,2

54

9,10

938

94,

497

8,66

22,

277

4,20

1

2,58

456

196

2

48,8

7523

,759

8,03

013

,688

3,39

812

,768

6,22

33,

051

2,79

070

45,

353

3,13

264

81,

330

243

12,9

266,

080

1,87

93,

816

1,15

19,

591

4,31

31,

029

3,49

275

78,

237

4,01

11,

423

2,26

054

3

23,0

1311

,233

3,28

06,

533

1,96

74,

947

2,71

433

81,

201

694

4,42

82,

114

474

1,43

240

86,

456

2,82

41,

555

1,62

245

587

737

919

417

6282

242

832

315

472,

259

1,16

448

651

891

3,22

41,

610

376

1,02

821

0

37,9

0915

,795

6,30

011

,376

4,43

859

637

62

146

727,

227

2,30

02,

312

1,86

674

93,

147

1,40

581

974

817

54,

898

2,30

974

41,

520

325

1,73

167

218

559

228

26,

823

2,87

980

21,

904

1,23

82,

450

1,05

616

886

136

55,

111

2,31

564

11,

435

720

5,92

62,

483

627

2,30

451

2

12,8

935,

507

2,06

34,

381

942

2,84

61,

354

566

845

81

4,53

52,

078

721

1,25

648

03,

210

1,21

754

91,

218

226

2,30

285

822

71,

062

155

20,9

639,

292

2,67

56,

001

.2,

995

1,89

960

227

073

229

54,

363

1,86

384

01,

118

'54

22,

406

1,31

630

869

389

12,2

955,

511

1,25

73,

458

2,06

9

12,0

816,

707

927

3,66

778

076

545

19

'26

837

897

514

1431

554

456

281

1014

223

4,30

82,

126

368

1,56

125

31,

087

713

8424

248

2,24

21,

292

120

605

225

1,96

91,

137

263

462

107

357

193

5972

33

37,4

9217

,195

5,02

811

,846

3,42

34,

977

1,79

798

71,

757

436

3,97

21,

747

733

1,05

643

627

,031

12,7

293,

254

8,63

52,

413

284

189

076

19

1,22

873

354

322

119

1,94

145

435

283

729

8

Not

eIn

clud

es s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

full

time

and

part

tim

e, b

ut e

xclu

des

grad

uate

stu

dent

sre

ceiv

ing

com

pens

atIo

n fo

r pa

rtim

e se

rvic

es.

Page 76: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le B

10. F

TE

sci

entis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

em

ploy

ed in

uni

vers

ities

and

colle

ges,

by

Sta

te a

nd fu

nctio

n, J

anua

ry 1

971

Sta

teT

otal

Fun

ctio

n

Tea

chin

gR

&D

Oth

erca

tiviti

esU

nite

d S

tate

s, to

tal

242,

713

170,

824

49,7

5122

,138

New

Eng

land

19,7

4213

,718

5,35

267

2M

aine

813

662

9457

New

Ham

pshi

re88

268

916

627

Ver

mon

t1,

003

733

167

103

Mas

sach

uset

ts11

,606

8,17

43,

180

252

Rho

de Is

land

1,20

583

430

071

Con

nect

icut

4,23

32,

626

1,44

516

2

Mid

c 1

Al l

intic

46,5

4433

,120

10,5

512,

873

New

Yor

k28

,029

18,9

237,

295

1,81

1C

AA

New

Jer

sey

,5,

091

4,18

180

410

6P

enns

ylva

nia

13,4

2410

,016

2,45

295

6E

ast N

orth

Cen

tral

42,9

0729

,669

8,27

34,

965

Ohi

o11

,2S

17,

195

2,14

51,

941

Indi

ana

5,07

63,

774

878

424

Illin

ois

11,0

617,

555

2,08

61,

420

Mic

higa

n8,

535

1,47

881

7W

isco

nsin

6,95

41,

686

363

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al21

,031

15,3

863,

675

1,97

0M

inne

sota

4,45

13,

826

420

205

Iow

a4,

248

2,70

888

365

7M

isso

uri

5,69

83,

852

1,21

862

8N

orth

Dak

ota

849

534

197

118

Sou

th D

akot

a78

261

813

925

Neb

rask

a1,

982

1,73

322

128

Kan

sas

3,02

12,

115

597

309

Sou

th A

tlant

ic34

,536

23,4

996,

420

4,61

7D

elaw

are

542

407

101

34M

aryl

and

6,23

03,

599

1,33

81,

293

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

2,41

51,

664

450

301

Virg

inia

4,54

63,

586

734

226

Wes

t Virg

inia

1,62

71,

179

175

273

Nor

th C

arol

ina

6,49

14,

375

1,10

51,

011

Sou

th C

arol

ina

2,32

31,

676

255

392

Geo

rgia

4,78

63,

191

1,00

559

0F

lorid

a5,

576

1,25

749

7E

ast S

outh

Cen

tral

12,1

692,

100

1,46

0K

entu

cky

2,63

91,

815

575

249

Ten

ness

ee4,

261

3,02

476

846

9A

laba

ma

3,05

12,

283

418

350

Mis

siss

ippi

2,21

81,

487

339

392

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al19

,519

12,7

324,

062

2,72

5A

rkan

sas

1,85

31,

028

299

526

Loui

sian

a4,

013

2,91

659

050

7O

klah

oma

2,29

31,

564

381

348

Tex

as11

,360

7,22

42,

792

1,34

4

Page 77: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

"" -

'N

ew J

erse

y

Pen

nsyl

vani

a

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

alO

hio

Indi

ana

Illin

ois

Mic

higa

nW

isco

nsin

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

alM

inne

sota

Iow

aM

isso

uri

Nor

th D

akot

aS

outh

Dak

ota

Neb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sou

th A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

U..)

Mar

ylan

dU

..)D

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

aV

irgin

iaW

est V

irgin

iaN

orth

Car

olin

aS

outh

Car

olin

aG

eorg

iaF

lorid

a

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

Ala

bam

a

Mis

siss

ippi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

alA

rkan

sas

Loui

sian

aO

klah

oma

Tex

as

Mou

ntai

nM

onta

naId

aho

Wyo

min

gC

olor

ado

New

Mex

ico

Ariz

ona

Uta

hN

evad

a

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

i

I

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

.

5,09

113

,424

4,18

110

,016

8C4

2,45

2

1,01

i10

695

6

42,9

0729

,669

8,27

34,

965

11,2

817,

195

2,14

51,

941

5,07

63,

774

878

424

11,0

617,

555

2,08

61,

420

8,53

56,

240

1 ,4

7881

7

6,95

44,

905

1,68

636

3

21,0

3115

,386

3,67

51,

970

4,45

13,

826

420

205

4,24

82,

708

883

657

5,69

83,

852

1,21

862

884

953

419

711

878

261

813

925

1,98

21,

733

221

283,

021

2,11

559

730

9

34,5

3623

,499

6,42

04,

617

542

407

101

346,

230

3,59

91,

338

1,29

32,

415

1,66

445

030

14,

546

3,58

673

422

61,

627

1,17

917

527

36,

491

4,37

51,

105

1,01

12,

323

1,67

625

539

24,

786

3,19

11,

005

590

5,57

63,

822

1,25

749

7

12,1

698,

609

2,10

01,

460

2,63

91,

815

575

249

4,26

13,

024

768

469

3,05

12,

283

418

350

2,21

81,

487

339

392

19,5

1912

,732

4,06

22,

725

1,85

31,

028

299

526

4,01

32,

916

590

507

2,29

31,

564

381

348

11,3

607,

224

2,79

21,

344

11,4

628,

136

2,42

690

074

861

611

913

835

567

8418

444

326

610

770

4,13

93,

340

693

106

1,04

478

420

951

2,11

21,

143

735

234

1,80

61,

212

387

207

335

208

9235

32,9

9924

,755

6,35

51,

889

4.60

03,

089

1,09

741

43,

660

2,51

792

621

723

,349

18,2

683,

942

1,13

923

814

591

21,

152

736

299

117

1,80

41,

200

537

67

Not

e. In

clud

es s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

full

time

and

part

tim

e, b

ut e

xclu

des

grad

uate

stu

dent

sre

ceiv

ing

com

pens

atio

n fo

r pa

rttim

e se

rvic

es.

Page 78: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le B

11. G

radu

ate

stud

ents

rec

eivi

ng c

ompe

nsat

ion

for

part

-tim

e se

rvic

es a

ssc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges,

by

field

of e

mpl

oym

ent a

nd fu

nctio

n,Ja

nuar

y 19

65, 1

967,

196

9, a

nd 1

971

Fie

ld o

f sci

ence

and

func

tion

Janu

ary

1965

1967

1969

1971

Tot

al58

,384

71,7

7784

,099

94,2

61

Eng

inee

rs10

,325

12,3

48.

13,3

3615

,300

Phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts17

,675

20,2

9323

,109

24,4

33

Mat

hem

atic

ians

4,72

56,

287

7,70

68,

391

Life

sci

entis

ts14

,897

18,2

0219

,767

23,1

57

Psy

chol

ogis

ts3,

012

4,01

35,

507

6,47

0

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

7,75

010

,634

14,6

7416

,510

Tea

chin

g29

,570

37,1

2444

,645

52,2

81

Eng

inee

rs3,

799

4,62

95,

092

5,87

7

Phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts9,

194

10,5

3911

,982

13,5

07

Mat

hem

atic

ians

3,75

94,

883

5,83

86,

586

Life

sci

entis

ts5,

869

7,77

39,

095

11,1

80

Psy

chol

ogis

ts1,

632

2,23

83,

159

3,75

8

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

5,31

77,

062

9,47

911

,373

Res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t27

,208

32,2

9936

,213

38,3

93

Eng

inee

rs6,

402

7,47

37,

872

8,89

9

Phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts8,

103

9,31

710

,627

10,4

71

Mat

hem

atic

ians

894

1,24

31,

589

1,47

2

Life

sci

entis

ts8,

528

9,82

010

,012

11,2

13

Psy

chol

ogis

ts1,

221

1,53

91,

993

2,24

0

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

2,06

02,

907

4,12

04,

098

Oth

er a

ctiv

ities

1,60

62,

354

3,24

13,

587

Eng

inee

rst..

..) -PP

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

124

378

246

437

372

500

524

455

Mat

hem

atic

ians

7216

127

933

3

Life

sci

entis

ts50

060

966

076

4

Psy

chol

ogis

ts15

923

635

547

2

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

373

665

1,07

51,

039

Tab

le B

12. N

umbe

r of

gra

duat

e st

uden

ts r

ecei

ving

com

pens

atio

n fo

r pa

rt-t

ime

serv

ices

as

scie

ntis

ts o

r en

gine

ers

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges,

by

func

tion,

type

of i

nstit

utio

n, a

nd fi

eld,

Jan

uary

1971

Fun

ctio

n an

d ty

peT

otal

Eng

inee

rsP

hysi

cal

Mat

hem

atic

ians

Life

entis

tP

sych

olog

ists

Soc

ial

scie

ntis

ts

Page 79: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

to 41.

eacr

ung

Eng

inee

rsP

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

Mat

hem

atic

ians

Life

sci

entis

tsP

sych

olog

ists

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

Res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t

Eng

inee

rsP

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

Mat

herh

atic

ians

Life

sci

entis

tsP

sych

olog

ists

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

Oth

er a

ctiv

i tie

s

Eng

inee

rsP

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

Mat

hem

atic

ians

Life

sci

entis

tsP

sych

olog

ists

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

3,79

94,

629

5,09

25,

R77

9,19

410

,539

11,9

8213

,507

3,75

94,

883

5,83

86,

586

5,86

97,

773

9,09

511

,180

1,63

22,

238

3,15

93,

758

5,31

77,

062

9,47

911

,373

27,2

0832

,299

36,2

1338

,393

6,40

27,

473

7.87

28,

899

8,10

39,

317

10,6

2710,471

894

1,243

1,589

1,472

8,52

89,

820

10,0

1211

,213

1,22

11,

539

1,99

32,

240

2,06

02,

907

4,12

04.

098

1,60

62,

354

3,24

13,

587

124

246

372

524

378

437

500

455

7216

127

933

350

060

966

076

415

923

635

547

237

366

51,

075

1,03

9

Tab

le B

12, N

umbe

r of

gra

duat

e st

uden

ts r

ecei

ving

com

pens

atio

n fo

r pa

rt-t

ime

serv

ices

as

scie

ntis

ts o

r en

gine

ers

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges,

by

func

tion,

type

of i

nstit

utio

n, a

nd fi

eld,

Jan

uary

197

1

Fun

ctio

n an

d ty

peof

inst

itutio

nT

otal

Eng

inee

rsP

hysi

cal

scie

ntis

tsM

athe

mat

icia

nsLi

fesc

ient

ists

Psy

chol

ogis

tsS

ocia

lsc

ient

ists

All

func

tions

, tot

al94

,261

15,3

0024

,433

8,39

123

,157

6,47

016

,510

Doc

tora

te88

,817

14,9

8523

,109

7,82

321

,839

5,73

615

,325

Mas

ter's

5,44

431

51.

324

568

1,31

873

41.

185

Tea

chin

g52

.281

5.87

713

,507

6,58

611

,180

3.75

811

,373

Doc

tora

te48

,144

5,66

812

,438

6,07

810

.160

3,25

010

,550

Mas

ter's

4.13

720

91.

069

508

1.02

050

882

3

Res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t38

,393

8,89

910

,471

1.47

211

,213

2,24

04,

098

Doc

tora

te37

,747

8,81

610

.334

1,46

011

,046

2,11

13,

980

Mas

ter's

646

8313

712

167

129

118

Oth

er a

ctiv

ities

3,58

752

445

533

376

447

21,

039

Doc

tora

te2,

926

501

337

285

633

375

795

Mas

ter's

661

2311

848

131

9724

4

Page 80: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le B

13. N

umbe

r of

gra

duat

e st

uden

ts r

ecei

ving

com

pens

atio

n fo

r pa

rttim

e se

rvic

es a

s sc

ient

ists

or e

ngin

eers

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges,

by

Sta

te,

Janu

ary

1965

, 196

7,19

69, a

nd 1

971

Sta

teJa

nuar

y

1965

1967

1969

1971

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l58

,384

71,7

7784

,099

94,2

61

New

Eng

land

5,38

46,

370

7,47

58,

755

Mai

ne11

514

416

326

1N

ew H

amps

hire

206

304

408

393

Ver

mon

t11

014

716

421

8M

assa

chus

etts

3,61

24,

005

4,55

45,

353

Rho

de Is

land

495

599

690

728

Con

nect

icut

846

1,17

11,

496

1,80

2M

iddl

e A

tlant

ic9,

690

11,1

0212

,543

14,6

85N

ew Y

ork

5,26

46,

107

6,94

38,

275

New

Jer

sey

1,20

21,

277

1,45

41,

291

Pen

nsyl

yqni

a3,

224

3,71

84,

146

5,11

9E

ast N

orth

Cen

tral

13,1

0616

,964

19,7

1522

,092

Ohi

o2,

737

3,55

24,

006

4,77

6In

dian

a2,

587

3,37

84,

413

4,13

8Ill

inoi

s3,

702

4,51

24,

787

5,83

3M

ichi

gan

2,10

32,

920

3,22

84,

035

Wis

cons

in1,

977

2,60

23,

281

3,31

0W

est N

orth

Cen

tral

6,51

08,

002

9,03

39,

557

Min

neso

ta1,

936

2,13

12,

102

2,16

9Io

wa

1,37

11,

658

2,16

02,

270

Mis

sour

i1,

246

1,66

41,

873

2,00

8N

orth

Dak

ota

149

278

436

452

Sou

th D

akot

a15

324

122

825

0N

ebra

ska

502

675

750

838

Kan

sas

1,15

31,

355

1,48

41,

570

Sou

th A

tlant

ic5,

636

7.66

89,

377

10,2

82D

elaw

are

391

452

467

493

Mar

ylan

d1,

227

1,68

31,

711

1,59

0D

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

a45

668

676

083

6V

irgin

iaj~

'54

1'

726

987

1,04

9W

est V

irgin

ia`-

112

137

237

171

Nor

th C

arol

ina

1,03

31,

366

1.47

11,

586

Sou

th C

arol

ina

373

420

704

866

Geo

rgia

571

759

1,20

31,

917

Flo

rida

932

1,43

91,

837

1,77

4E

ast S

outh

Cen

tral

2,10

22,

606

3,31

73,

808

Ken

tuck

y44

444

756

169

3T

enne

ssee

806

955

1,39

81,

627

Ala

bam

a52

463

374

472

5M

issi

ssip

pi32

857

161

476

3

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al4,

733

6,11

37,

319

8,05

9A

r ka

nsis

252

318

362

403

Loui

sian

a91

21,

209

1,26

61,

286

Okl

ahom

a1.

059

1,16

11,

125

1,15

8

Page 81: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

'Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

New

Yor

kN

ew J

erse

y

Pen

nsyl

vani

aE

ast N

orth

Cen

tral

Ohi

oIn

dian

aIll

inoi

sM

ichi

gan

Wis

cons

in

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

alM

inne

sota

Iow

aM

isso

uri

Nor

th D

akot

aS

outh

Dak

ota

Neb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sou

th A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

Mar

ylan

dD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

aV

irgin

iaW

est V

irgin

iaN

orth

Car

olin

aS

outh

Car

olin

aG

eorg

iaF

lorid

a

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

Ala

bam

aM

issi

ssip

pi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

alA

rkan

sas

Loui

sian

aO

klah

oma

Tex

as

Mou

ntai

nM

onta

naId

aho

Wyo

min

gC

olor

ado

New

Mex

ico

Ariz

ona

Uta

hN

evad

a

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

i

Out

lyin

g A

reas

9,69

011

,102

12,5

4314

,685

5,26

46,

107

6,94

38,

275

1,20

21,

277

1,45

41,

291

3.22

43,

718

4,14

65,

119

13,1

0616

,964

19,7

1522

,092

2,73

73,

552

4,00

64.

776

2,58

73,

378

4,41

34,

138

3,70

24,

512

4,78

75,

833

2,10

32,

920

3,22

84,

035

1,97

72,

602

3,28

13,

310

6,51

08,

002

9,03

39.

557

1.93

62,

131

2,10

22,

169

1,37

11,

658

2,16

02,

270

1,24

61,

664

1,87

32,

008

149

278

436

452

153

241

228

250

502

675

750

838

1,15

3.

1,35

51,

484

1,57

0

5,63

67,

668

9,37

710

,282

391

452

467

493

1,22

71,

683

1,71

11,

590

456

686

760

836

541

726

987

1,04

911

213

723

717

1

1,03

31,

366

1,47

11,

586

373

420

704

866

571

759

1,20

31,

917

932

1,43

91,

837

1,77

4

2,10

22,

606

3,31

73,

808

444

447

561

693

806

955

1,39

81,

627

524

633

744

725

328

571

614

763

4,73

38,

113

7,31

98,

059

252

318

362

403

912

1,20

91,

266

1,28

61.

059

1,16

11,

125

1,15

82,

510

3.42

54,

566

5,21

2

3,49

64,

349

5,09

65,

834

246

226

317

387

138

202

178

169

6219

324

631

285

91,

115

1,42

81,

843

408

i 552

598

613

952

1,02

81,

146

1,21

972

989

21,

001

1,08

210

214

118

220

9

7,64

78,

518

10,1

2111

,009

1,29

51,

585

1,73

31,

761

885

1,04

81,

284

1,42

25,

205

5.57

86,

624

7,25

267

5072

7219

525

740

850

2

8085

103

180

1

Page 82: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

1114

. Num

ber

of g

radu

ate

stud

ents

rec

eivi

ng c

ompe

nsat

ion

for

part

time

serv

ices

as

scie

ntis

ts o

r en

gine

ers

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges,

by

Sta

te a

nd fi

eld,

Jan

uary

197

1

Sta

teT

otal

Eng

inee

rsP

hysi

cal

scie

ntis

tsM

athe

mat

icia

nsLi

fesc

ient

ists

Psy

chol

ogis

tsS

ocia

lsc

ient

ists

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l94

,261

15,3

0024

,433

8,39

123

,157

6,47

016

,510

New

New

Eng

land

8,75

51,

811

2,37

956

62,

010

584

1,40

5

Mai

ne26

137

4114

8934

46

New

Ham

pshi

re39

360

117

9132

48

Ver

mon

t21

820

5510

8631

16

Mas

sach

uset

ts5,

353

1,33

31,

428

332

1,30

833

761

5

Rho

de Is

land

728

151

289

115

1911

1

Con

nect

icut

1,80

221

044

912

232

113

156

9

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

14,6

852,

786

4,41

91,

225

2,88

01,

077

2,29

8

New

Yor

k8,

275

1,48

02,

278

671

1,72

467

71,

445

New

Jer

sey

1,29

133

739

010

520

110

015

8

Pen

nsyl

vani

a5,

119

969

4

1,75

144

995

530

069

5

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al22

,092

3,35

45,

668

2,27

85,

210

1,51

84,

064

Ohi

o4,

776

770

1,18

842

01,

257

341

800

Indi

ana

4,13

868

692

745

81,

044

227

796

Illin

ois

5,83

399

91,

739

622

1,18

044

784

6

Mic

higa

n4,

035

517

874

432

1,07

230

683

4

Wis

cons

in3,

310

382

940

346

657

197

788

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al9,

557

1,15

91,

859

758

3,10

868

91,

984

Min

neso

ta2,

169

300

361

140

729

122

517

Iow

a2,

270

290

499

163

734

7550

9

Mis

sour

i2,

008

285

363

217

614

120

409

Nor

th D

akot

a45

243

112

1619

337

51

Sou

th D

akot

a25

068

4510

918

28

Neb

rask

a83

838

148

8128

655

230

Kan

sas

1,57

013

533

113

146

127

224

0

Sou

th A

tlant

ic10

,282

1,34

52,

571

866

3,02

160

11,

878

Del

awar

e49

310

214

943

8722

90

Mar

ylan

d1,

590

137

421

158

474

9530

5

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

836

9626

052

185

4519

8

Virg

inia

1,04

919

722

248

394

3315

5

Wes

t Virg

inia

171

635

610

77

10

Nor

th C

arol

ina

1,58

617

634

620

546

687

306

Sou

th C

arol

ina

866

140

184

119

217

7113

5

Geo

rgia

1,91

720

939

211

166

712

241

6

Flo

rida

1,77

428

256

212

442

411

926

3

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al3,

808

487

766

354

1,24

335

160

7

Ken

tuck

y69

325

197

8820

163

119

Ten

ness

ee1,

627

236

361

139

444

220

227

Ala

bam

a72

512

312

780

291

1391

Mis

siss

ippi

763

103

8147

307

5517

0

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al8,

059

1,39

11,

963

837

1,89

552

71,

446

Ark

ansa

s40

345

114

3212

324

65

Loui

sian

a1,

286

143

340

138

389

7520

1

Okl

ahom

a1,

158

192

225

136

362

5319

0

Tex

as5,

212

1,01

11,

284

531

1,02

137

599

0-

.w

as1

flgt

Page 83: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Eas

t 'N

orth

Cen

tral

Ohi

oIn

dian

aIll

inoi

sM

ichi

gan

Wis

cons

in

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

alM

inne

sota

Iow

aM

isso

uri

Nor

th D

akot

aS

outh

Dak

ota

Neb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sou

th A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

Mar

ylan

dD

istr

ict o

f n lu

mbi

aV

irgin

iaW

est V

irgin

iaN

orth

Car

olin

aS

outh

Car

olin

aG

eorg

iaF

lorid

a

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

Ala

bam

aM

issi

ssip

pi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

alA

rkan

sas

Loui

sian

aO

klah

oma

Tex

as

Mou

ntai

nM

onta

naId

aho

Wyo

min

gC

olor

ado

New

Mex

ico

Ariz

ona

1

Uta

hN

evad

a

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

i

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

22,0

:14

4,:.)

tyi

b,uu

d1,

..:/b

b,11

01,

t)1Z

33,

Uu

4,77

677

01,

188

420

1,36

734

180

04,

138

686

927

458

1,04

4'

227

796

5,83

399

91.

7391

622

1.18

044

784

64,

035

517

8741

432

1,07

230

683

43,

310

382

9401

.346

657

197

788

9,55

71,

159

1,85

975

83,

108

689

1,98

42,

169

300

361

140

729

122

517

2,27

029

049

916

373

475

509

2,00

828

536

321

761

412

040

945

243

112

1619

337

51

250

6845

1091

828

838

3814

881

286

5523

01,

570

135

331

131

461

272

240

10,2

821,

345

2,57

186

63,

021

601

1.87

849

310

214

943

8722

901,

590

137

421

158

474

9530

583

696

260

5218

545

198

1,04

919

722

248

394

3315

517

16

356

107

710

1,58

617

634

620

546

687

506

866

140

184

119

217

7113

5

1,91

720

939

211

166

712

241

61,

774

282

562

124

424

119

263

3,80

8,

487

766

354

1,24

335

160

7

693

2519

788

201

6311

9

1,62

723

636

113

944

422

022

772

512

312

780

291

1391

763

103

8147

307

5517

0

8,05

91,

391

1,96

383

71,

895

527

1.44

640

345

114

3212

324

651,

286

143

340

138

389

7520

1

1.15

819

222

513

636

253

190

5,21

21,

011

1,28

453

11,

021

375

990

5,83

488

91,

619

554

1,24

749

41.

031

387

4990

3712

234

5516

918

5922

536

11

312

3012

330

5915

551,

843

350

482

159

334

125

393

613

9619

278

9054

103

1,21

917

438

510

824

699

20/

1,08

214

123

698

291

146

170

209

3152

2252

1537

11,0

092,

034

3,12

494

42,

489

629

1,78

91.

761

281

465

164

416

5538

0

1,42

282

463

137

410

141

189

7,25

21,

606

2,03

962

11.

492

400

1,09

472

1318

618

612

502

5213

916

153

2811

4

180

4465

954

08

Page 84: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le B

.15.

Gra

duat

e st

uden

ts r

ecei

ving

com

pens

atio

n fo

r pa

rttim

e se

rvic

es a

s sc

ient

ists

or e

ngin

eers

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges,

by

Sta

te a

nd fu

nctio

n. J

anua

ry 1

971

Sta

teT

otal

num

ber

Ful

ltim

e eq

uiva

lent

Tot

alT

each

ing

R&

DO

ther

activ

ities

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l94

,261

42,9

9122

,818

18,5

981,

575

=8,

755

3,90

81,

838

.1...

..-...

...-.

-....

.11,

928

142

New

Eng

land

Mai

ne26

113

075

550

New

Ham

pshi

re39

313

553

820

Ver

mon

t21

896

6135

0M

assa

chus

etts

5,35

32,

312

1,28

290

312

7R

hode

Isla

nd72

835

217

716

96

Con

nect

icut

1,80

288

319

068

49

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

14,6

856,

603

3,19

73,

092

314

Now

Yor

k8,

275

3,56

01,

805

1,62

113

4N

thvi

erso

y1,

291

635

352

281

2P

enns

ylva

nia

5,11

92,

408

1,04

01,

190

178

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al22

,092

10,5

275,

832

4,23

446

1O

hio

4,77

62,

632

1,58

587

617

1In

dian

a4,

138

2,29

11,

310

890

91Ill

inoi

s5,

833

2,69

71,

238

1,34

511

4M

ichi

gan

4,03

5,1,

432

1,01

734

570

Wis

cons

in3,

310

1,47

568

277

815

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al9,

557

4,70

62,

631

1,98

194

Min

neso

ta2,

169

974

648

320

6Io

wa

2,27

01,

120

550

539

31M

isso

uri

2,00

81,

134

580

522

32N

orth

Dak

ota

452

255

108

139

8S

outh

Dak

ota

250

8450

340

Neb

rask

a83

841

431

494

6K

ansa

s1,

570

72 5

381

333

11

Sou

th A

tlant

ic10

,282

4,23

32,

251

1,87

5D

elaw

are

493

302

100

202

0M

ary'

end

1,59

056

939

916

46

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

836

466

290

150

26'V

irgin

ia1,

049,

397

193

182

22W

est V

irgin

ia17

157

3121

5N

orth

Car

olin

a1,

586

760

409

348

3S

outh

Car

olin

a86

625

413

910

411

Geo

rgia

1,91

765

235

028

616

Flo

rida

1,77

477

634

041

818

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al3,

808

1,61

590

761

989

Ken

tuck

y69

328

917

793

19T

enne

ssee

1,62

764

642

117

154

Ala

bam

a72

531

917

314

51

Mis

siss

ippi

763

361

136

210

15W

est S

outh

Cen

tral

8,05

93,

699

2,07

41,

420

205

Ark

ansa

s40

119

210

287

3Lo

uisi

ana

1,28

657

430

919

96

Okl

alio

Ma

11

58.

nJ5

.39

3.._

308

ld

i 1

Page 85: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

New

Jer

sey

Pen

nsyl

vani

a

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

alO

hio

Indi

ana

Illin

ois

Mic

higa

nW

isco

nsin

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

alM

inne

sota

Iow

aM

isso

uri

Nor

th D

akot

aS

outh

Dak

ota

Neb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sou

th A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

Mar

ylan

dD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

aV

irgin

iaW

est V

irgin

iaN

orth

Car

olin

aS

outh

Car

olin

aG

eorg

iaF

lorid

a

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

Ala

bam

aM

issi

ssip

pi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

alA

rkan

sas

Loui

sian

aO

klah

oma

Tex

as

Mou

ntai

nM

onta

naId

aho

Wyo

min

gC

olor

ado

Now

Mex

ico

Ariz

ona

Uta

hN

evad

a

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

if er

ml

Ala

ska

Haw

aii

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

i.,,..

i..)

1,291

3,31

A13

635

.. k,

$)

352

1,t./

.1 I

281

I.34 2

5,11

92,

408

1,04

01,

190

178

22,0

9210

,527

5,83

24,

234

461

4,77

62,

632

1,58

587

617

14,

138

2,29

11,

310

890

915,

833

2,69

71,

238

1,34

511

44,

035

1,43

21,

017

345

703,

310

1,47

568

277

815

9,55

74,

706

2,63

11,

981

942,

169

974

648

320

62,

270

1,12

055

053

931

2,00

81,

134

580

522

3245

225

510

813

98

250

8450

340

838

414

314

946

1,57

072

538

133

311

10,2

824,

233

_2,

251

___.

1,87

5_

107

493

302

100

202

01,

590

569

399

164

683

646

629

015

026

1,04

939

719

318

222

171

5731

215

1,58

676

040

934

83

866

254

139

104

11

1,91

765

235

028

616

1,77

477

634

041

818

3,80

81,

615

907

619

8969

328

917

793

191,

627

646

421

171

5472

531

917

314

51

763

361

136

210

15

8,05

93,

699

2,07

41,

420

205

403

192

102

873

1,28

657

436

919

96

1,15

856

532

320

834

5,21

22,

368

1,28

092

616

2

5,83

42,

552

1,44

91,

010

9338

716

011

050

016

985

5232

1

312

7855

230

1,84

369

734

633

912

613

309

205

7925

1,21

955

230

922

914

1,08

257

932

122

038

209

9251

383

11,0

095,

047

2,55

02,

431

661,

761

796

435

355

61,

422

.52

123

127

812

7,25

23,

451

1,72

41,

685

4272

3317

151

502

246

143

985

180

101

89

Page 86: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

L

tra 00

Tab

le 1

3.16

. Num

ber

of te

chni

cian

s em

ploy

ed in

the

scie

nces

and

engi

neer

ing

in u

nive

rsiti

es

and

colle

ges,

by

func

tion

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed, f

ield

of e

mpl

oym

ent,

and

type

of i

nstit

utio

n, J

anua

ry 1

971

i

Fun

ctio

n an

d fie

ld o

f em

ploy

men

tT

otal

Inst

itutio

ns g

rant

ing

Doc

tora

teM

aste

r'sB

ache

lor's

No

scie

nce

degr

ee

All

func

tions

, tot

al46

,013

42,7

231,

358

593

1,33

9

Eng

inee

ring

and

phys

ical

scie

nces

10,8

928

893

812

372

815

Life

sci

ence

s33

,562

32,5

5042

211

547

5

Soc

ial s

cien

ces

1,55

91,

280

124

106

49

Res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t.

..

31,9

0931

,358

393

5810

0

Eng

inee

ring

and

phys

ical

scie

nces

6,90

66,

577

232

5245

Life

sci

ence

s24

,097

23,9

0413

26

55

Soc

ial s

cien

ces

906

877

290

0

Oth

er a

ctiv

ities

i14

,104

11,3

6596

553

51,

239

Eng

inee

ring

and

phys

ical

scie

nces

3,98

62,

316

580

320

770

Life

sci

ence

s9,

465

8,64

629

010

942

0

Soc

ial s

cien

ces

653

403

9510

649

t

)

Page 87: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le B

.17.

Num

ber

of te

chni

cian

s em

ploy

ed in

the

scie

nces

and

eng

inee

ring

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

ndco

llege

s, b

y S

tate

and

func

tion

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed, J

anua

ry 1

971

Sta

teT

otal

Fun

c io

nR

&D

Oth

erac

tiviti

esU

nite

d S

tate

s, to

tal

46,0

1331

,913

914

,104

New

Eng

land

3,56

43,

090

474

Mai

ne55

478

New

Ham

pshi

re14

813

018

Ver

mon

t69

1356

Mas

sach

uset

ts2,

672

2,35

232

0R

hode

Isla

nd15

813

523

Con

nect

icut

462

413

49M

iddl

e A

tlant

ic9,

189

6,71

12.

4 58

New

Yor

k6,

118

4,20

41,

914

New

Jer

sey

736

550

186

Pen

nsyl

vani

a2,

315

1,95

735

8E

ast N

orth

Cen

tral

7,05

24,

196

2,85

6O

hio

2,05

11,

276

775

Indi

ana

752

538

214

Illin

ois

2,25

41,

048

1,20

6M

ichi

gan

1,14

084

929

1W

isco

nsin

855

485

370

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al4,

732

3,13

91,

593

Min

neso

ta1,

221

673

548

Iow

a50

236

513

7M

isso

uri

1,04

570

234

3N

orth

Dak

ota

1 57

6988

Sou

th D

akot

a95

7619

Nob

rask

a70

950

120

8K

ansa

s1,

003

753

250

7,28

34,

676

v2,

607

Sou

th A

tlant

ic(.4

Del

awar

e27

1017

0M

aryl

and

1,33

287

146

1D

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

a41

821

120

7V

irgin

ia1,

544

700

844

Wes

t Virg

inia

8671

15N

orth

Car

olin

a1,

291

950

341

Sou

th C

arol

ina

288

112

176

Geo

rgia

1,13

387

226

1F

lorid

a1,

164

879

285

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al2,

298

1,32

097

8K

entu

cky

674

448

226

Ten

ness

ee72

146

825

3A

laba

ma

461

314

147

Mis

siss

ippi

442

9035

2W

est S

outh

Cen

tral

3,74

12,

574

1,16

7A

rkan

sas

268

7019

8Lo

uisi

ana

663

540

123

Okl

ahom

a29

013

3157

Tex

as2.

520

1,83

1689

i 1

Page 88: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

New

Yor

kN

ew J

erse

yP

enns

ylva

nia

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

alC

ilia

Indi

ana

Illin

ois

Mic

higa

nW

isco

nsin

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al

Min

neso

taIo

wa

Mis

sour

iN

orth

Dak

ota

Sou

th D

akot

aN

ebra

ska

Kan

sas

Sou

th A

tlant

ic44

Del

awar

e'0

Mar

ylan

dst

,

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

Virg

inia

Wes

t Virg

inia

Nor

th C

arol

ina

Sou

th C

arol

ina

Geo

rgia

Flo

rida

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

Ala

bam

aM

issi

ssip

pi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

alA

rkan

sas

Loui

sian

aO

klah

oma

Tex

as

Mou

ntai

nM

onta

naId

aho

Wyo

min

g,

Col

orad

oN

ew M

exic

oA

rizon

aU

tah

Nev

ada

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

i

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

4,204

1,91

455

018

61,957

358

4.19

62.

856

1,27

677

553

821

41,

048

1,20

684

929

148

537

0

4,73

23,

139

1,59

31,

221

673

548

365

137

702

343

6988

7619

501

208

753

250

7,28

34,

676

2,60

7

502

1,04

515

7 9570

91,

003

2710

171,

332

871

461

418

211

207

1,54

470

084

486

7115

1,29

195

034

128

811

217

61,

133

872

261

1.16

487

9"28

5

2,29

81,

320

978

674

448

226

721

468

253

461

314

147

442

9035

2

3,74

12,

574

1,16

726

870

198

663

540

123

290

133

157

2,52

01,

831

689

1,82

51,

463

362

127

101

2620

416

/63

4419

550

482

6827

822

157

400

312

8837

229

280

157

8

6,10

04,

521

1,57

91,

349

1,06

028

955

231

523

73,

911

2,91

599

618

12 .

627

021

951

249

219

30

Page 89: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le 1

318.

Sel

ecte

d ch

arac

teris

tics

of c

urre

nt a

nd c

apita

lexp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch,

deve

lopm

ent,

and

inst

ruct

ion

in th

e sc

ienc

es a

nd e

ngin

eerin

gin

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s,

1964

, 196

6, 1

968,

and

197

0

Typ

e of

exp

endi

ture

1964

1966

1968

1970

Tot

al$3

,959

,170

$5,1

29,0

18$6

,957

,279

S7,

872,

463

Cur

rent

R&

D e

xpen

ditu

res

41,5

94,8

9542

,084

,684

42,5

98,7

082,

856,

427

Sou

rce

of fu

nds:

Fed

eral

gov

ernm

ent

917,

322

1,26

1,03

41,

572.

064

1,65

8,29

8

Sta

te g

over

nmen

tsi1

73,

154

}19

1,90

821

5,08

826

1,01

0

Loca

l gov

ernm

ents

11,7

1810

,387

11,9

31

Fou

ndat

ions

Vol

unta

ry h

ealth

age

ncie

si

61,4

111

53,4

9423

,017

71,6

2523

,639

75,8

0936

,067

Indu

stry

40,3

6342

,242

55,2

5361

,633

Inst

itutio

ns' o

wn

fund

s38

1.34

646

9,63

661

4,53

069

6,74

7

Oth

er s

ourc

es21

,299

31,6

3536

,122

54,9

32

Cha

ract

er o

f wor

k:B

asic

res

earc

h1,

260,

914

1,60

1,31

22,

011,

207

2,18

5,65

7

App

lied

rese

arch

293,

377

400,

078

492,

047

526,

576

Dev

elop

men

t40

,604

83,2

9495

,459

I14

4,19

4

Fie

ld o

f sci

enc

I)1,

554,

291

2,00

1,39

02,

503,

259

2,71

2,23

3

Eng

inee

ring

198,

768

280,

363

333,

968

346,

427

Phy

sica

l sci

ence

s25

6,14

533

2,68

336

3,49

836

8,78

9

Env

ironm

enta

lsci

ence

sc63

,127

76,4

8513

5,36

313

0,27

7

Mat

hem

atic

s48

,246

61,2

0579

,118

102,

444

Life

sci

ence

s79

4,96

798

1,11

31,

169,

390

1,31

1,36

6

Psy

chol

ogy

43,9

8555

,487

77,4

6479

,532

Soc

ial s

cien

cesc

l12

5,35

116

8,29

424

7,08

52/

2,98

2

Oth

er s

cien

ces,

NE

C23

,702

45.7

6097

,353

100,

416

Cur

rent

exp

endi

turp

s fo

r in

stru

ctio

n°1,

834,

783

2,37

7,33

73,

287,

844

4,06

4,16

3

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t,an

d in

stru

ctio

n52

9,49

266

6,99

71,

070,

727

951,

873

Fed

eral

gov

ernm

ent

134,

439

212,

397

340,

447

279,

316

Oth

er s

ourc

es39

5,05

345

4,60

073

0,28

067

2,55

7

'Incl

udes

est

imat

es fo

r de

part

men

tal r

esea

rch

and

for

othe

r R

&D

cos

tsfo

r w

hich

mos

t uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s

do n

ot m

aint

ain

sepa

rate

rec

ords

.l'E

xclu

eles

dev

elop

men

t exp

endi

ture

s no

t req

uest

ed b

y bo

ld o

f sci

ence

.

cThe

term

, ear

th s

cien

ces,

was

use

d in

196

4 an

d 19

66 r

athe

r th

an e

nviro

nmen

tals

cien

ces.

dInd

ucle

s an

thro

polo

gy; e

cono

mic

s; h

isto

ry; l

ingu

istic

s; p

oliti

cal s

cien

ce, s

ocio

logy

;and

soc

ial s

cien

ces,

NE

C.

Exc

lude

s de

part

men

tal r

esea

rch

expe

nditu

res,

whi

ch a

re in

clud

ed w

ith c

urre

ntR

&D

exp

endi

ture

s in

this

tabl

e.

SO

UR

CE

: Nat

iona

l Sci

ence

Fou

ndat

ion.

Dat

a de

rived

from

the

1964

, 196

6, 1

969,

and

197

1 S

urve

ys o

fS

cien

tific

Act

iviti

es o

f Ins

titut

ions

of H

ighe

r E

duca

tion.

Tab

le 8

.19.

Cur

rent

and

cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t, an

din

stru

ctio

n in

the

scie

nces

and

eng

inee

ring

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges,

by

type

of e

xpen

ditu

re a

nd ty

pe o

f con

trol

,19

64, 1

966,

196

8, a

nd 1

970

!Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds)

Typ

e of

exp

endi

ture

1964

119

66I

1968

All

inst

itutio

ns19

70

Page 90: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Dev

elop

men

t40

,604

83,2

9495

,459

144,

194

Fie

ld o

f sci

ence

b1.

554,

291

2.00

1.39

02,

503.

259

2312

,233

Eng

inee

ring

198,

768

280,

363

333,

988

346,

427

Phy

sica

l sci

ence

s25

6,14

533

2.68

336

3.49

836

8.78

9E

nviro

nmen

tal s

cien

cesc

63,1

27

76,4

8513

5,36

313

0,27

7

Mat

hem

atic

s48

,246

61,2

0579

,118

102,

444

Life

sci

ence

s79

4.96

798

1,11

31.

169,

390

1,31

1,36

6

Psy

chol

ogy

43,9

8555

,487

77,4

6479

,532

Soc

ial s

cien

ced

125,

351

168,

294

247.

085

272,

982

Oth

er s

cien

ces,

NE

C23

.702

45,7

6097

.353

100,

416

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r in

stru

ctio

n°1,

834,

783

2,37

7,33

73,

287,

844

4,06

4,16

3

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t,bn

d in

stru

ctio

n52

9,49

266

6,99

71,

070,

727

951,

873

Fed

eral

gov

ernm

ent

134,

439

212,

397

340,

447

279,

316

Oth

er s

ourc

es1

395,

053

454,

600

730,

280

672,

557

I

°Inc

lude

s es

timat

es fo

r de

part

men

tal r

esea

rch

and

for

othe

r R

&D

cos

ts fo

r w

hich

mos

t uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

sdo

not

mai

ntai

n se

para

te r

ecor

ds.

bExc

iude

s de

velo

pmen

t exp

endi

ture

s no

t req

uest

ed b

y fie

ld o

f sci

ence

.

cThe

term

, ear

th s

cien

ces,

was

use

d in

196

4 an

d 19

66 r

athe

r th

an e

nviro

nmen

tal s

cie-

ies.

dlnc

lude

s an

thro

polo

gy; e

cono

mic

s; h

isto

ry; l

ingu

istic

s; p

oliti

cal s

cien

ce, s

ocio

logy

; and

soc

ial s

cien

ces,

NE

C.

°Exc

lude

s de

part

men

tal r

esea

rch

expe

nditu

res,

whi

ch a

re in

clud

ed w

ith c

urre

nt R

&D

exp

endi

ture

s in

this

tabl

e.

SO

UR

CE

: Nat

iona

l Sci

ence

Fou

ndat

ion.

Dat

a de

rived

from

the

1964

, 196

6, 1

969,

and

197

1 S

urve

ys o

fS

cien

tific

Act

iviti

es o

f Ins

titut

ions

of H

ighe

r E

duca

tion.

Tab

le B

.19.

Cur

rent

and

cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t, an

d in

stru

ctio

n in

the

scie

nces

and

eng

inee

ring

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd C

olle

ges,

by

type

of e

xpen

ditu

re a

nd ty

pe o

f con

trol

,19

64, 1

966,

1968

, and

197

0

(Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds)

Typ

e of

exp

endi

ture

1964

1966

1968

1970

All

inst

itutio

nsT

otal

$3,9

59.1

70

$5,1

29,0

18$6

.957

,279

$7,8

72,4

63C

urre

nt R

&D

exp

endi

ture

s1,

594,

895

2,08

4,68

42,

598,

708

2,85

6,42

7C

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

inst

ruct

ion

1,83

4,78

32,

377,

337

3,28

7,84

44,

064,

163

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

529,

492

666,

997

1.07

0,72

795

1,87

3P

ublic

inst

itutio

nsT

otal

2,40

3,51

83,

172,

392

4,29

2,47

75,

063,

548

Cur

rent

R&

D e

xpen

ditu

res

898,

455

1,19

2,11

61,

497,

885

1,72

3,68

3C

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

inst

ruct

ion

.1,

184,

151

1,53

3,91

52,

120,

425

2,67

6,81

4

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

320,

912

446,

361

674,

167

663,

051

Priv

ate

inst

itutio

ns

Tot

al1,

555,

652

1.95

6,62

62,

664,

802

2,80

8,91

5C

urre

nt R

&D

exp

endi

ture

s69

6,44

089

2,56

81,

10U

,823

1,13

2,74

4C

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

inst

ruct

ion

650,

632

843,

422

1,16

7,41

91,

387,

349

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

208,

580

220,

636

396,

560

288,

822

Page 91: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le B

.20.

Cur

rent

and

cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

and

inst

ruct

ion

in th

e sc

ienc

es a

nden

gine

erin

g in

uni

vers

ities

and

colle

ges,

by

type

of e

xpen

ditu

re, f

ield

of s

cien

ce, a

nd ty

pe o

f con

trol

, 197

0

(DC

Ilars

in th

ousa

nds)

Typ

e of

exp

endi

ture

Tot

alE

ngin

eerin

g

Phy

sica

l and

envi

ronm

enta

lsc

ienc

esM

athe

mat

ics

Life

scie

nces

Psy

chol

ogy

Soc

ial

scie

nces

Oth

ersc

ienc

es,

n.e.

c.A

ll in

stitu

tions

Tot

al$7

,728

,269

$991

,878

$1,3

46,3

76$5

07,2

53$3

,016

,512

$329

,688

$1,2

74,1

41$2

62.4

21C

urre

nt r

esea

rch

expe

nditu

res

2,71

2,23

334

6,42

749

9,06

610

2,44

41,

311,

366

79,5

3227

2,98

210

0,41

6C

urre

ntex

pend

iture

sfo

rin

stru

ctio

n4,

064.

163

512,

828

622,

042

366,

649

1,28

6,67

422

8,12

093

9,11

010

8,74

0C

apita

l exp

endi

ture

s .

..

951,

873

132,

623

225,

268

38,1

6041

8,47

222

,036

62,0

4953

,265

R&

D a

nd g

radu

ate

inst

ruct

ion

505,

885

53,3

4810

3,70

314

,481

291,

648

7,12

018

,601

16,9

84U

nder

grad

uate

445,

988

79,2

7512

1,56

523

,679

126,

824

14.9

1643

,448

36,2

81P

ublic

inst

itutio

nsT

otal

4,97

5,58

662

5,57

282

2,20

433

7,96

51,

949,

217

216,

073

847,

478

177,

077

Cur

rent

res

earc

hex

pend

iture

s1,

635,

721

193,

280

,,27

3,87

765

,044

809,

702

51,9

1017

8,68

663

,222

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

sfo

rin

stru

ctio

n2,

676,

814

349,

830

401,

533

248,

239

831,

831

149,

887

623,

880

71.6

14C

apita

l exp

endi

ture

s .

..

.66

3,05

182

,462

146,

794

24,6

8230

7,68

414

,276

44.9

1242

,241

R&

D a

nd g

radu

ate

in:,t

ruc

tion

348.

497

27,5

7769

,104

9,23

821

2,17

05,

088

12,4

5912

,861

Und

ergr

adua

te3:

4,55

454

,885

77,6

9015

,444

95,5

149,

188

32,4

5329

.380

Priv

ate

inst

itutio

nsT

otal

2,75

2,68

336

6,30

652

4,17

216

9,28

81,

067,

295

113,

615

426,

663

85,3

44C

urre

nt r

esea

rch

expe

nditu

res

1,07

6,51

215

3,14

722

5,18

937

,400

501,

664

27,6

2294

,296

37,1

94C

urre

ntex

pend

iture

sfo

rin

stru

ctio

n1,

387,

349

162,

998

220,

509

118;

410,

454,

843

78,2

3331

5,23

037

,126

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

..

.28

8,82

250

,161

78,4

7413

,478

110,

788

7,76

017

,137

11,0

24R

&D

and

gra

duat

eIn

stru

ctio

n15

7.38

825

,771

34,5

995,

243

79,4

782,

032

6.14

24,

123

Und

ergr

adua

te13

1,43

424

,390

43,8

758,

235

31,3

105,

728

10,9

956,

901

Tab

le 8

.21.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent i

n un

iver

sitie

s an

d co

llege

s,by

sou

rce

of fu

nds,

195

3.70

a

(Dol

lars

in m

illio

ns)

Yea

rb

Tot

alR

&D

perf

orm

ance

Sou

rce

of fu

nds

Uni

vers

ities

'an

d co

llege

s'ow

n fu

ndsc

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

Sta

te a

nd lo

cal

gove

rnm

ents

' Indu

stry

Oth

er n

onpr

ofit

inst

itutio

ns19

53d

..

-$

334

$ 13

8$

49$1

9$

26$1

0319

5437

716

055

2228

112

1955

d.

..

.40

91t

..162

2530

123

1956

d.

,.

.48

021

370

2934

134

1957

d.

..

.53

122

9-

8034

3815

019

5859

225

490

3942

167

1959

d.

..

.68

230

610

039

4719

019

60d

..

..

825

4C5

112

4052

216

..

Page 92: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Inst

ruct

ion

505,

885

53,3

4810

3,70

314

,481

291,

648

7,12

018

,601

16,9

84U

nder

grad

uate

445,

988

79,2

7512

1,56

523

,679

126,

824

14,9

1643

,448

36,2

81P

ublic

inst

itutio

nsT

otal

4,97

5,58

662

5,57

282

2,20

433

7,96

51,

949,

217

216,

073

847,

478

177,

077

Cur

rent

res

earc

hexpenditures

1,63

5,72

119

3,28

027

3,87

765

,044

809,

702

51,9

1017

8,68

663,222

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

sfo

rin

stru

ctio

n2,

676,

814

349,

830

401,

533

248,

239

831,

831

149,

887

623,

880

71,6

14C

apita

l exp

endi

ture

s.

.66

3,05

182

,462

146,

794

24,6

8230

7,68

414

,276

44,9

1242

,241

R&

D a

nd g

radu

ate

inst

ruct

ion

348,

497

27,5

7769

,104

9,23

821

2,17

05,

088

12,4

5912

,861

Und

ergr

adua

te31

4,55

454

,885

77,6

9015

,444

95,5

149,

188

32,4

5329

,380

rivat

e in

stitu

t ons

Tot

al2,

752,

683

366,

306

524,

172

169,

288

1,06

7,29

511

3,61

542

6,66

385

,344

Cur

rent

res

earc

hex

pend

iture

s1,

076,

512

153,

147

225,

189

37,4

0050

1,66

427

,622

94,2

9637

,194

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

sfo

rin

stru

ctio

n1,

387,

349

162,

998

220,

509

118,

410

454,

843

78,2

3331

5,23

037

,126

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

..

288,

822

50,1

6178

,474

13,4

7811

0,78

87,

760

17,1

3711

,024

R&

D a

nd g

radu

ate

inst

ruct

ion

157,

388

25,7

7134

,599

5,24

379

,478

2,03

26,

142

4,12

3U

nder

grad

uate

131,

434

24,3

9043

,875

8,23

531

,310

5,72

810

,995

6,90

1

Tab

le 8

-21.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent i

n un

iver

sitie

s an

d co

llege

s,by

sou

rce

of fu

nds,

195

3.70

d

(Dol

lars

in m

illio

ns)

Yea

rb

Tot

alR

&D

perf

orm

ance

Sou

rce

of fu

nds

Uni

vers

ities

'an

d co

llege

s'ow

n fu

ndsc

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

Sta

te a

nd lo

cal

gove

rnm

ents

Indu

stry

Oth

er n

onpr

ofit

inst

itutio

ns19

53d

..

..

$ 33

4S

138

$ 49

$19

$ 26

$103

1954

377

160

5522

2811

219

55d

..

..

409

169

6225

3012

319

56d

..

..

480

213

7029

3413

4

1957

d.

..

.53

122

980

3438

150

1958

592

254

9039

4216

719

59d

..

..

682

306

100

3947

190

1960

d.

.82

540

511

240

5221

6

1961

d.

..

.96

950

012

540

5824

619

62d

..

..

1,14

361

313

940

6628

519

6Sd

..

..

1,35

976

015

541

7333

019

641,

595

917

173

4183

382

19b5

d1,

822

1,0/

318

841

9342

719

662,

085

1,26

120

442

108

470

1967

d.

..

.2,

329

1,40

921

448

119

539

1968

2,59

91,

572

225

5513

161

519

69d

..

..

2,70

51,

600

245

6014

565

519

702,

856

1,65

827

362

166

697

'Bas

ed o

n da

ta o

btai

ned

in N

SF

sur

veys

cov

erin

g R

&D

fina

ncin

g in

195

4, 1

958,

196

4, 1

966,

196

8,an

d 19

70.

bAca

dem

ic y

ear

endi

ng in

the

year

sho

wn;

for

exam

ple,

195

3 re

fers

to "

acad

emic

yea

r'195

253.

"cI

nclu

des

estim

ates

for

depa

rtm

enta

l res

earc

h an

d fo

r ot

her

rese

arch

act

iviti

es fo

r w

hich

mos

t uni

vers

ities

and

colle

ges

do n

ot m

aint

ain

sepa

rate

rec

ords

.

dEst

imat

es d

eriv

ed fr

om r

elat

ed in

form

atio

n; n

o se

ctor

surv

ey to

ok p

lace

this

yea

r.

Page 93: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le 8

22. C

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

and

deve

lopm

ent i

n un

iver

sitie

s an

d co

llege

s, b

y ch

arac

ter

of w

ork.

1953

.70a

(Dol

lars

in m

illio

ns)

Yea

rbT

otal

'

Bas

ic r

esea

rch

App

lied

rese

arch

Dev

elop

men

t

Am

ount

Per

cent

of to

tal

Am

ount

Per

cent

of to

tal

Am

ount

Per

cent

of to

tal

1953

c$

334

$ 17

351

.8$1

4643

.7$

154.

5

1954

377

206

54.6

154

40.8

174.

5

1955

c40

923

757

.915

537

.917

4.2

1956

'48

028

659

.616

935

.225

5.2

1957

c53

133

763

.516

931

.825

4.7

1958

592

390

65.9

175

29`.

627

4.6

1959

c68

246

868

.618

627

.328

4.1

1960

c82

557

669

.821

526

.134

4.1

1961

c96

970

172

.323

324

.035

3.6

1962

c1,

143

850

74.4

253

22.1

403.

5

1963

c1,

359

1.03

676

.228

30.

840

2.9

1964

1,59

51,

261

79.1

294

18.4

402.

5

1965

c1,

822

1,41

977

.934

619

.057

3.1

1966

2,08

51,

601

76.8

400

19.2

844.

0

1967

c2.

329

1,79

57;

.144

419

.190

3.9

1968

2,59

92,

011

77.4

492

18.9

953.

7

1969

c2.

705

2,08

777

.250

118

.511

74.

3

1970

2,85

62.

186

76.5

527

18.4

144

5.0

alnc

lude

s es

timat

es fo

r de

part

men

tal r

esea

rch

and

for

othe

r re

sear

chac

tiviti

es fo

r w

hich

mos

t uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s do

not

mai

ntai

nse

para

te r

ecor

ds.

bAca

dem

ic y

ear

endi

ng in

he y

ear

show

n; fo

r ex

ampl

e. 1

953

refe

rs to

"aca

dem

ic y

ear

1952

.53.

"

cEst

imat

es d

eriv

ed fr

om r

elat

ed in

form

atio

n: n

o se

ctor

sur

vey

took

plac

e th

is y

ear.

Tab

le 1

323.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fr

om u

nive

rsiti

es' a

nd c

olle

ges'

ow

n fu

nds

for

sepa

rate

ly a

nd n

onse

para

tely

bud

gete

d R

&D

, 195

3.70

a

Yea

rbT

otal

Sep

arat

ely

budg

eted

Non

sepa

rate

lybu

dget

edc

1953

d$1

03$

24$

7919

5411

225

87

1955

d12

326

97

1956

d13

426

108

1957

d15

029

121

1958

167

3113

6

1959

d19

034

156

1960

d21

637

179

1961

d24

640

206

1962

d28

546

239

1963

d33

052

278

1964

382

5932

3

1965

d42

779

348

1966

470

100

370

1967

d53

913

140

8

1968

615

165

450

1969

d65

518

047

5

1970

697

197

500

aBas

ed o

n da

ta o

btai

ned

in N

SF

sur

vey

cove

ring

R&

D fi

nanc

ing

in 1

954.

195

8, 1

964,

196

6, 1

968,

and

197

0.

bAca

dem

ic y

ear

endi

ng in

the

year

sho

wn:

for

exam

ple.

195

3 re

fers

to "

acad

emic

yea

r 19

52.5

3."

cfnc

lude

s es

timat

es fo

r de

part

men

tal r

esea

rch

and

for

othe

r re

sear

ch a

ctiv

ities

for

whi

ch m

ost u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd

Page 94: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

1969

c19

70

2.70

52,

856

2,08

72,

186

77.

76.5

501

527

18.5

18.4

144

5.0

alnc

lude

s es

timat

es fi

r de

part

men

tal r

esea

rch

and

for

othe

r re

sear

chac

tiviti

es fo

r w

hich

mos

t uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s do

not

mai

ntai

n

sepa

rate

rec

ords

.

bAca

dem

ic y

ear

endi

ng in

the

year

sho

wn;

for

exam

ple,

195

3 re

fers

to"a

cade

mic

yea

r 19

52.5

3."

`Est

imat

es d

eriv

ed fr

om r

elat

ed in

form

atio

n: n

o se

ctor

sur

vey

took

plac

e th

is y

ear.

Tab

le B

23. C

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

from

uni

vers

ities

' and

colle

ges'

ow

n fu

nds

for

sepa

rate

ly a

nd n

onse

para

tely

bud

gete

d R

&D

,19

53.7

0a

Yea

rbT

otal

Sep

arat

ely

budg

eted

Non

sepa

rate

lybu

dget

ed'

1953

d$1

03S

24

$ 79

1954

112

2587

1955

d12

326

97

1956

d13

426

108

1957

d15

029

121

1958

167

3113

6

1959

d19

034

156

1960

d21

637

179

1961

d24

640

206

1962

d28

546

239

1963

d33

052

278

1964

382

5932

3

1965

d42

779

348

1966

470

100

370

1967

d.

539

131

408

1968

615

165

450

1969

d65

518

047

5

1970

697

197

500

abas

ed o

n da

ta o

btai

ned

in N

SF

sur

veys

cov

erin

g R

&D

fina

ncin

g in

195

4, 1

958,

196

4, 1

966,

196

8, a

nd19

70.

bAca

dem

ic y

ear

endi

ng in

the

y ta

r sh

own;

for

exam

ple,

195

3 re

fers

to "

acad

emic

yea

r 19

52.5

3."

`Inc

lude

s es

timat

es fo

r de

part

men

tal r

esea

rch

and

for

othe

r re

sear

ch a

ctiv

ities

for

whi

ch m

ost

univ

ersi

ties

and

colle

ges

do n

ot m

aint

ain

sepa

rate

rec

ords

.dE

stim

ates

der

ived

from

rel

ated

info

rmat

ion:

no

sect

or s

urve

y to

ok p

lace

this

yea

r.

Tab

le 8

-24.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent i

nun

iver

sitie

s an

d co

llege

s, b

y so

urce

of fu

nds

and

type

of i

nstit

utio

n, 1

970

[Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds]

Sou

rce

of fu

nds

Tot

al

Inst

itutio

ns g

ant

ing

Doc

tora

teM

aste

r'sB

ache

lor's

No

scie

nce

degr

ee

Tot

al.5

2,85

6,42

7$2

,750

,806

$78,

046

$19,

843

$7,7

32

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

1,65

8,29

81,

626,

074

21,8

317,

036

3,35

7

Sta

te g

over

nmen

ts26

1,01

025

6,74

43,

203

910

153

Loca

l gov

ernm

ents

11,9

3111

,489

396

2323

Fou

ndat

ions

75,8

0972

,269

2,23

789

840

5

Vol

unta

ry h

ealth

age

ncie

s36

,067

35,9

5899

100

Indu

stry

61,6

3359

,574

1,65

130

510

3

Inst

itutio

n's

own

finds

696,

747

634,

468

48,1

7410

,430

3,67

5

Oth

er s

ourc

es54

,932

54,2

3045

523

116

Page 95: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

.T

able

325

. Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent i

n un

iver

sitie

s an

d co

llege

s, b

y S

tate

and

sou

rce

of fu

nds,

197

0

[Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds)

Sta

teT

otal

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

Sta

te.

gove

rnm

ents

Loca

lgo

vern

men

Fou

ndat

ions

Vol

unta

ryhe

alth

agen

cies

Indu

stry

Inst

itutio

ns'

own

fund

sO

ther

sour

ces

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l ..

.$2

,856

.427

$1,6

58,2

98$2

61,0

10$1

1,93

1$7

5,80

9$3

6,06

7$6

1,63

3$6

96,7

47$5

4,93

2N

ew E

ngla

nd33

5,64

023

5,02

77,

446

172

13,8

337,

39C

5,25

861

,069

5,44

5M

aine

4,61

51,

567

1,06

10

171

247

1,12

02

New

Ham

pshi

re .

.11

,135

7,49

344

50

269

6521

924

7668

Ver

mon

t6,

870

3,86

169

60

9847

812,

007

80M

assa

chus

etts

..

.23

6,16

917

3,82

93,

455

153

12,2

661,

497

4,53

335

,498

4,93

8R

hode

Isla

nd.

..

14.6

688.

699

1.25

71

229

103

304,

281

68C

onnv

nicu

t62

.183

39.5

7853

218

954

5.67

714

814

.987

289

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

543,

238

323.

441

l16

.205

8.37

716

,757

10,0

3514

,588

145.

010

8.82

5N

ew Y

ork

324,

550

202,

582

9,91

87,

667

11,0

428,

103

6,88

472

,541

5,81

3N

ew J

erse

y54

,925

31,3

1185

90

1.42

880

1,13

318

.976

1.13

8P

enns

ylva

nia

163,

763

89,5

485,

428

710

4.28

71,

852

6,57

153

,493

1,87

4E

ast N

orth

Cen

tral

..

.48

5.62

726

5,82

440

.832

823

14.7

595.

621

12.6

9513

3,88

611

.187

Ohi

o92

.761

50,3

109,

117

265

1,47

81,

209

2,77

824

,888

2,71

6In

dian

a60

,936

33,3

751,

559

331,

477

831

1,79

121

,121

749

Illin

ois

132.

267

77,2

5012

,210

209

5.76

61,

470

1,03

133

.440

891

Mic

higa

n11

0.05

765

,018

3,21

731

44,

170

1,10

14,

590

27,8

313.

816

Wis

cons

in89

,606

39,8

7114

,729

21,

868

1,01

02,

505

26,6

063,

01:,

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al23

7.64

6i

118,

856

27,4

6023

33,

192

1,09

54,

589

75,1

577,

064

Min

neso

ta49

.839

27,8

483,

427

01,

826

795

213

,831

1.94

8Io

wa

36,4

6717

.166

4,11

570

222

413

966

13.3

7713

8M

isso

uri

76.5

85.

43,6

825,

919

4753

021

81,

458

20,8

023.

929

Nor

th D

akot

a .

..

6,68

81.

839

1.96

50

184

2113

72,

264

278

Sou

th D

akot

a .

..

11.0

083,

643

5,37

224

188

317

1.40

522

1N

ebra

ska

22,3

306,

625

159

2527

811

632

314

.667

137

Kan

sas

34,7

2918

,053

6,50

367

134

312

436

8,81

141

3S

outh

Atla

ntic

341,

391

190.

141

37.8

1952

27.

341

3.42

57,

464

87,3

187,

361

Del

awar

e6,

503

2,91

458

70

508

034

72,

099

48M

aryl

and

59,6

0042

,044

4,95

712

11,

384

634

1,13

37,

730

1,59

7D

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

a30

.695

20,6

2971

188

905

160

707

6,64

71.

468

Virg

inia

32,5

5217

,832

4,63

518

793

320

1,12

47,

376

454

Wes

t Virg

inia

..

.12

.335

5,82

31,

631

067

107

804,

473

154

Nor

th C

arol

ina

..

68,0

1942

,403

10,1

0423

1,82

282

51,

017

11,0

9173

4S

outh

Car

olin

a.

.12

,715

4,63

13,

595

1818

923

284

3.96

114

Geo

rgia

54,9

8225

.231

9.15

520

859

352

41,

745

15,7

451,

781

Flo

rida

63,9

9028

,634

3,08

426

1,08

083

21,

027

28,1

961,

111

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al.

.10

1.40

855

.644

8,86

593

91.

827

1,79

42,

323

28,9

231.

095

Ken

tuck

y20

,171

9,99

61,

553

500

537

633

561

6,31

769

Ten

ness

ee37

.814

23.1

1950

351

856

823

744

10,9

5176

7A

laba

ma

25.3

1513

,385

4,43

319

251

161

422

6,53

211

2M

issi

ssip

pi18

,1C

A9.

144

2.37

636

918

317

259

65.

123

145

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al .

.20

1,05

496

.446

43,5

2425

25.

314

1,86

94,

304

45,7

903,

535

Ark

ansa

s10

.780

4.60

93.

792

075

7127

71,

902

54Lo

uisi

ana

41.7

4521

.248

10,3

3711

51,

114

838

-62

26,

727

744

Okl

ahom

a22

.551

8,74

74,

564

1711

287

550

7.92

155

3

Page 96: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

New

Yor

kN

ew J

erse

yP

enns

ylva

nia

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al .

.

Ohi

oIn

diat

iaIll

inoi

s .

Mic

higa

nW

isco

nsin

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al .

Min

neso

talo

w)

Mis

sour

iN

orth

Dak

ota

..

.

Sou

th D

akot

a .

..

Nsb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sou

th A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

Mar

ylan

dD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

aV

irgin

iaW

est V

irgin

ia.

.

Nor

th C

arol

ina

..

Sou

th C

arol

ina

..

Geo

rgia

Flo

rida

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al.

.

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

..

Ala

bam

aM

issi

ssip

pi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al .

.

Ark

ansa

sLo

uisi

ana

Okl

ahom

aT

exas

MoJ

ntai

nM

onta

naId

aho

Wyo

min

gC

olor

ado

New

Mex

ico

Ariz

ona

Uta

hN

evad

a

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

i

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

324,

550

541.

925

163.

763

202,

582

31,3

1189

,548

9,91

885

95,

428

7,66

7 071

0

11,0

421,

428

4,28

7

8,10

3 801,

852

6,88

41,

133

6,57

1

72.5

4118

,976

53,4

93

5,81

31,

138

1.87

448

5.62

726

5,82

440

,832

823

14.7

595.

621

12.6

9513

3.88

611

.187

60,9

3613

2.26

711

r r

89,6

06

50,3

1033

,375

77,2

5065

,016

39,8

71

9,11

71,

559

12.2

103,

217

14,7

29

265

33 209

314 2

1,47

81,

477

5.76

64,

170

1.86

8

1,20

983

11.

470

1,10

11.

010

2,77

81,

791

1,03

14,

590

2,50

5

24,8

8821

,121

33.4

4027

,831

26,6

06

2,71

674

989

13,

816

3,01

523

7,64

611

8,85

627

,460

233

3,19

21,

095

4,58

975

,1 5

77,

064

49,8

3927

,848

3,42

70

1,82

67

I 95

213

,831

1,94

836

,467

17,1

664,

115

7022

241

396

613

,377

138

76,5

8543

,682

5,91

947

530

218

1,45

820

,802

3,92

96.

688

018

421

137

2,26

427

811

,008

3,64

35,

372

2418

a31

71A

05

221

22.3

306,

625

159

2527

811

632

314

.667

137

34,7

2918

,053

6,50

367

134

312

436

8,81

141

334

1,39

119

0,14

137

,819

522

7,34

13,

425

7.46

487

.318

7,36

16,

503

2,91

458

70

508

034

72,

099

4859

,600

42,0

444,

957

121

1,38

463

41,

133

7,73

01.

597

30,6

9520

,629

7110

890

516

070

76,

647

1.46

832

,552

17,8

324,

635

1879

332

01,

124

7,37

645

412

,335

5,82

31.

631

067

107

804,

473

154

68,0

1942

,403

10,1

0423

1,82

282

51,

017

11,0

9173

412

,715

4,63

13.

595

1818

923

284

3.96

114

54,9

8225

.231

9,15

520

859

352

41,

745

15,7

451,

781

63,9

9028

,634

3,08

426

1,08

083

21,

027

28,1

961.

111

101,

408

55,6

448,

865

939

1,82

7,

1,79

42,

323

28,9

231,

093

20,1

71x,

996

1,55

350

053

7-

638

561

6,31

769

37,8

1423

,119

503

5185

682

374

410

,951

767

25,3

1513

,385

4,43

319

251

161

422

6,53

211

218

,108

9,14

42.

376

369

183

172

596

5,12

314

520

1,05

496

,446

43,5

2425

25,

314

1,88

94,

304

45,7

903,

535

10,7

804,

609

3,79

20

7571

277

1,90

254

41,7

4521

,248

10,3

3711

51,

114

838

622

6,72

774

4' 2

2,55

18.

747

4,56

417

112

8755

07,

921

'55

312

5.97

801

.842

24.8

3112

04.

013

801

2,85

529

.240

2,18

415

8,63

096

,822

21.8

2519

31,

262

1,19

15,

829

28,1

053,

303

10,9

924,

656

3,41

20

386

232

2,55

692

7,40

92,

801

2.97

44

62

591,

537

267,

421

3,40

323

26

360

824

2,71

420

658

,414

41,0

273,

478

7661

381

62,

960

8,67

676

821

,523

16,8

851,

246

411

347

1,08

61,

713

204

22,6

909,

534

4,70

051

220

5744

66,

052

1.63

023

,798

15,6

563,

112

1534

063

222

4,01

337

76,

383

2.86

02,

671

08

00

844

0

439,

325

271,

582

53,8

3642

011

,497

3,47

74,

396

87,1

007,

017

58,0

1733

,180

8,77

517

897

358

41,

289

11,6

871,

351

37,0

0221

,789

4,20

55

1.42

950

760

47,

454

1,00

931

4,63

420

0,26

237

,262

22C

8,85

62,

304

2,42

158

,757

4,55

29,

726

5,93

83,

253

00

00

535

019

,946

10,4

1334

117

239

8282

8,66

710

512

,468

4,51

53,

198

027

5018

74,

389

102

Page 97: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

t

Tab

le 8

26. C

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

and

dev

elop

men

t in

univ

arsi

tinan

d co

llege

s, b

y S

tate

,

1964

, 198

8, 1

968,

and

197

0

Sta

te19

6419

6619

6819

70

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l$1

,594

,895

$2,0

84.6

84$2

,598

,708

$2,8

56.4

27

New

Eng

land

174,

465

239,

935

294,

786

335,

640

Mai

ne3,

712

3,87

14,

236

4,61

5

New

Ham

pshi

re6,

433

8,66

98,

426

11,1

35

Ver

mon

t3,

864

4,21

26,

255

6,87

0

Mas

sach

uset

ts11

6,80

317

1,43

321

1.85

323

6,16

9

Rho

de Is

land

10,5

4214

,468

16,5

5114

,668

Con

nect

icut

33,1

1137

,282

47,4

6562

,183

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

,---

-31

6.72

041

5,44

352

2,25

954

3,23

8

New

Yor

k18

5,31

225

5,01

131

2,39

832

4,55

0

Now

Jer

sey

42,3

6146

,787

56,9

3754

,925

Pen

nsyl

vani

a89

,047

113,

645

152,

924

163.

763

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al29

5,22

836

9,21

045

1,08

448

5,62

7

Ohi

o56

,063

67,4

5486

,992

92,7

61

Indi

ana

37,4

6447

,404

53,9

0460

,936

Illin

ois

94,8

8110

8,35

113

3,33

413

2,26

7

Mic

higa

n65

,752

86,3

2697

,049

110,

057

Wis

oncs

in41

,068

59,6

7579

,805

89,6

06

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al12

4,59

516

1,60

320

4,89

623

7,64

6

Min

neso

ta29

,495

36,1

1642

,329

49,8

39

Iow

a23

,584

25,6

3532

,981

36,4

67

Mis

sour

i33

,391

51,1

1863

,500

76,5

85

Nor

th D

akot

a4,

582

5,66

26,

785

6,68

8

Sou

th D

akot

a5,

254

10,2

8311

,470

11,0

08

Neb

rask

a,.

9,20

710

,440

17,0

1922

,330

Kan

sas

19,0

8222

.349

30,8

1234

,729

Sou

th A

tlant

ic18

4.27

824

5,16

431

2.68

734

1,39

1

Del

awar

e3,

881

3,96

15,

254

6,50

3

Mar

ylan

d40

,846

49,3

9661

,548

59,6

00

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

16,3

4424

,267

27,0

9230

,695

Virg

inia

18,5

9823

,457

25,8

9032

,552

Wes

t Virg

inia

6,04

67,

829

9,24

412

,335

Nor

th C

arol

ina

35,5

0050

,205

66,8

7868

,019

Sou

th C

arol

ina

6,93

78,

675

9,99

012

,715

Geo

rgia

21,9

5334

,771

48,9

3354

,982

Flo

rdia

34.1

7342

,603

57,8

5863

,990

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al60

.472

73,2

4893

,306

101,

408

Ken

tuck

y12

,576

15,7

1519

,173

20,1

71

Ten

ness

ee23

,733

27,5

6634

.481

37,8

14

Ala

bam

a15

,219

18,1

8724

,524

25,3

15

Mis

siss

ippi

8,94

411

,780

15,1

2818

,108

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al..

104,

087

138,

445

177,

826

201,

054

Ark

ansa

s8,

248

9,98

811

,719

10,7

80

Loui

sian

a25

,332

31,7

9537

,536

41,7

45I

R '1

111

17/1

11aa

ntr,

" qql

A

Page 98: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

New

Jer

sey

Pen

nsyl

vani

a

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

alO

hio

Indi

ana

Illin

ois

Mic

higa

nW

ison

csin

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

alM

inne

sota

Iow

aM

isso

uri

Nor

th D

akot

aS

outh

Dak

ota

......

.

Neb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sou

th A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

Mar

ylan

dD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

aV

irgin

iaW

est V

irgin

iaN

orth

Car

olin

aS

outh

Car

olin

aG

eorg

iaF

lord

ia

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

Ala

bam

aM

issi

ssip

pi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

alA

rkan

sas

Loui

sian

aO

klah

oma

Tex

as

Mou

ntai

n

Mon

tana

Idah

o

Wyo

min

gC

olor

ado

New

Mex

ico

Ariz

onia

Uta

hN

evad

a

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

i

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

42,3

6146

,787

56,9

3754

,925

89,0

4711

3,64

515

2,92

416

3,76

3

295,

228

369,

210

451,

084

485,

627

56,0

6367

,454

86,9

9292

,761

37,4

6447

,404

53,9

0460

,936

94,8

8110

8,35

113

3,33

413

2,26

765

,752

86,3

2697

,049

110,

057

41,0

6859

,675

79,8

0589

,606

124,

595

161,

603

204,

896

237,

646

29,4

9536

,116

42,3

2949

,839

23,5

8425

,635

32,9

8136

,467

33,3

9151

,118

63,5

0076

,585

4,58

25,

662

6,78

56,

688

5,25

410

,283

11,4

7011

,008

9,20

710

,440

17,0

1922

,330

19,0

8222

,349

30,8

1234

,729

184,

278

245,

164

312,

687

341,

391

3,88

13,

961

5,25

46,

503

40,8

4649

,396

61,5

4859

,600

16,3

4424

,267

27,0

9230

,695

18,5

9823

,457

25,8

9032

,552

6,04

67,

829

9,24

412

,335

35,5

0050

,205

66,8

7868

,019

6,93

78,

675

9,99

012

,715

21,9

5334

,771

48,9

3354

,982

34,1

7342

,603

57,8

5863

,990

60,4

7273

,248

93,3

0610

1.40

8

12,5

7615

,715

19,1

7320

,171

23,7

3327

,566

34,4

8137

,814

15,2

1918

,187

24,5

2425

,315

8,94

411

,780

15,1

2818

,108

104,

087

138,

445

'17

7,82

620

1,05

4

8,24

89,

988

11,7

1910

,780

25,3

3231

,795

37,5

3641

,745

14,3

0117

,013

22,5

1522

,551

56,2

0679

,649

106,

056

125,

978

87,8

9111

2,17

413

0,69

615

8,63

0

4,43

27,

028

8,05

610

,992

4,81

45,

894

5,89

57,

409

4,05

25,

918

6,52

87,

421

24,7

8232

,399

43,9

4158

,414

15,8

9317

,139

21,7

5421

,523

14,0

7317

,692

16,2

4222

,690

16,5

9320

,255

21,8

8623

,798

3,25

25,

849

6,39

46,

383

239,

393

320,

351

399,

676

439,

325

30,1

2038

,704

51,0

5958

,017

19,0

5523

,594

30,1

7737

,002

177,

705

240,

425

295,

459

314,

634

4,52

77,

509

9,13

89,

726

7,98

610

,119

13,8

4319

,946

---.

7,76

69,

111

11,4

9212

,468

Page 99: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le 1

327.

Fed

eral

ly fi

nanc

ed c

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

and

dev

elop

men

t in

univ

ersi

ties

and

colle

ges,

by

Sta

te, 1

964,

196

6, 1

968,

and

197

0

Sta

te19

6419

6619

6819

70U

nite

d S

tate

s, to

tal

8917

,322

81,2

61,0

3481

,572

,064

81,6

58,2

98N

ew E

ngla

nd11

8,60

018

2,30

422

3,49

123

5,02

7M

aine

1,50

71,

107

1,38

51,

567

New

Ham

pshi

re4

434

6,31

25,

823

7,49

3V

erm

ont

2,25

62,

746

3,24

63,

861

Mas

sach

uset

ts81

,443

136,

518

171,

320

173,

829

Rho

de Is

land

7,70

210

,059

} 10

,920

8,69

9C

onne

ctic

ut21

,258

25,5

6230

,797

39,5

78M

iddl

e A

tlant

ic19

8,51

826

3,59

032

4,08

532

3,44

1N

ew Y

ork

120,

282

162,

054

202,

292

202,

582

New

Jer

sey

23,4

3729

,043

34,1

3531

,311

Pen

nsyl

vani

a54

,799

72,4

9387

,658

89,5

48E

ast N

orth

Cen

tral

172,

334

226,

644

261,

838

265,

824

Ohi

o29

,023

36,4

5847

,465

50,3

10In

dian

a19

,306

29,9

5233

,716

33,3

75Ill

inoi

s59

,265

72,4

2383

,762

77,2

50M

ichi

gan

42,5

0554

,893

61,4

3965

,018

Wis

cons

in22

,23E

32,9

1835

,456

39,8

71N

est N

orth

Cen

tral

57,8

78,3

4110

7,00

411

8,85

6M

inne

sota

17,0

9021

,985

27,1

6127

,848

Iow

a11

,220

13,1

3015

,206

17,1

66M

isso

uri

14,9

4423

,517

36,7

0143

,682

Nor

th D

akot

a1,

888

1,41

91,

572

1,83

9S

outh

Dak

ota

2,15

03,

405

3,91

63,

643

Neb

rask

a2,

997

4,36

55,

809

6,62

5K

ansa

s7,

557

10,5

2016

,639

18,0

53S

outh

Atla

ntic

99,2

0813

7,49

417

8,03

8;8

0,14

1D

elaw

are

1,56

61,

847

2,20

32,

914

Mar

ylan

d28

,712

35,1

1442

,611

42,0

44D

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

a11

,241

16,4

3218

,158

20,6

29V

irgin

ia9,

273

12,1

2213

,176

17,8

32W

est V

irgin

ia1,

921

3,81

76,

034

5,82

3N

orth

Car

olin

a18

,169

27,8

4442

,737

42,4

03S

outh

Car

olin

a2,

640

3,64

23,

835

.4,

631

Geo

rgia

9,91

116

,074

20,8

4325

,231

Flo

rida

15,7

7520

,602

28,4

4128

,634

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al28

,623

37,5

9947

,019

55,6

44K

entu

cky

4,83

37,

145

8,75

69,

996

Ten

ness

ee12

,964

16,5

3819

,253

23,1

19A

laba

ma

6,86

88,

286

12,0

8713

,385

Mis

siss

ippi

3,95

85,

630

6,92

39,

144

Nes

t Sou

th C

ontr

ol49

,838

71,4

3295

,076

96,4

46A

rkan

sas

3,35

84,

872

5,42

54,

609

Loui

sian

a11

,681

14,6

0419

,802

21,2

48O

klah

oma

6,60

38,

208

12,4

758,

747

Tex

as28

,196

43,7

4857

,374

61,8

42V

loun

tain

47,0

3962

,043

76,6

9696

,822

Mon

tana

1,62

12,

478

3,72

24,

656

Idah

o1,

486

1,89

81,

899

2,80

1W

yom

ing

999

1.72

82,

694

3,40

3C

olqr

ado

..1

5 R

IVI

70 6

1'3

29 n

14_

41_0

77

Page 100: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Indi

ana

19,3

0629

,952

33,7

1633

,375

Illin

ois

59,2

6572

,423

83,;6

277

,250

Mic

higa

n42

,505

54,8

9361

,439

65,0

18W

isco

nsin

22,2

3532

,918

35,4

5639

,871

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al57

,846

78,3

4110

7,00

411

8,85

6M

inne

sota

17,0

9021

,985

27,1

6127

,848

Iow

a11

,220

13,1

3015

,206

17,1

66M

isso

uri

14,9

4423

,517

36,7

0143

682

Nor

th D

akot

a1,

888

1,41

91,

572

1,83

9S

outh

Dak

ota

2,15

03,

405

3,91

63,

643

Neb

rask

a2,

997

4,36

55,

809

6,62

5K

ansa

s7,

557

10,5

2016

,639

18,0

53S

outh

Atla

ntic

99,2

0813

7,49

417

8,03

819

0,14

1D

elaw

are

1,56

61,

847

2,20

32,

914

..tz

Mar

ylan

d28

,712

35,1

1442

,611

42,0

44t..

/tD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

a11

,241

16,4

3218

,158

20,6

29V

irgin

ia9,

273

12,1

2213

,176

17,8

32W

est V

irgin

ia1,

921

3,81

76,

034

5,82

3N

orth

Car

olin

a18

,169

27,8

4442

,737

42,4

03S

outh

Car

olin

a2,

640

3,64

23,

835

4,63

1G

eorg

ia9,

911

16,0

7420

,843

25,2

31F

lorid

a15

,775

20,6

0228

,441

28,6

34E

ast S

outh

Cen

tral

28,6

2337

,599

47,0

1955

,644

Ken

tuck

y4,

833

7,14

58,

756

9,99

6T

enne

ssee

12,9

6416

,538

19,2

5323

,119

Ala

bam

a6,

868

8,28

612

,087

13,3

85M

issi

ssip

pi3,

958

5,63

06,

923

9,14

4W

est S

outh

Cen

tral

49,8

3871

,432

95,0

7696

,446

Ark

ansa

s3,

358

4,87

25,

425

4,60

9Lo

uisi

ana

11,6

8114

,604

19.8

0221

,248

Okl

ahom

a6,

603

8,20

812

,475

8,74

7T

exas

28,1

9643

,748

57,3

7461

,842

Mou

ntai

n47

,039

62,0

4376

,696

96,8

22M

onta

na1,

621

2,47

83,

722

4,65

6Id

aho

1,48

61,

898

1,89

92,

801

Wyo

min

g99

91,

728

2,69

43,

403

Col

orad

o15

,863

20,6

5329

,914

41,0

27N

ew M

exic

o11

,4 4

912

,497

14,9

2616

,885

Ariz

ona

6,63

88,

443

7,34

59,

534

Uta

h7,

833

12,2

0913

,336

15,6

56N

evad

a1,

150

2,13

72,

860

2,86

0P

acifi

c14

1,33

919

8,03

025

4,58

727

1,58

2W

ashi

ngto

n16

,318

21,7

6530

,774

33,1

80O

rego

n10

,775

14,0

1018

,152

21,7

89C

alifo

rnia

108,

270

151,

613

193,

368

200,

262

Ala

ska

2,29

95,

027

5,59

65,

938

Haw

aii

4,17

75,

615

6,69

710

,413

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

3,47

73,

557

4,23

04,

515

Page 101: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le 8

.28.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch in

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s by

field

of s

cien

ce a

ndso

urce

of f

unds

, 196

4, 1

966,

196

8, a

nd19

70a

(Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds(

Fie

ld o

f sci

ence

and

sour

ce o

f fun

ds19

6419

6619

6819

70

Tot

al$1

,554

,291

$2,0

01,3

90$2

,503

,259

$2,7

12,2

33

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

..

894,

579

1,20

2,32

01,

504,

359

1,55

4,71

3

Oth

er S

ourc

es65

9,71

279

9,07

099

8,90

01,

157,

520

Eng

inee

ring

198,

768

280,

363

333,

988

346,

427

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

..

.12

4.91

218

3,02

021

7,35

821

2,53

8

Oth

er s

ourc

es73

,856

97,3

4311

6,63

013

3,88

9

Phy

sica

l and

env

ironm

enta

lsc

ienc

es31

9,27

240

9,16

849

8,86

149

9,06

6

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

..

228,

106

295,

252

353,

751

344,

297

Oth

er s

ourc

es91

,166

113,

916

145,

110

154,

769

Mat

hem

atic

s48

,246

61,2

0579

,118

102,

444

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

..

25,1

1829

,657

39,9

4147

,667

Oth

er s

ourc

es23

,128

31,5

4839

,177

54,7

77

Life

sci

ence

s79

4,96

798

1,11

31;

169,

390

1,31

1,36

6

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

..

443,

389

577,

006

703,

125

767,

053

Oth

er s

ourc

es35

1,57

840

4,10

746

6,26

554

4,31

3

Psy

chol

ogy

43,9

8555

,487

77,4

6479

,532

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

..

26,9

9333

,482

47,4

5845

,005

Oth

er s

ourc

es16

,992

22,0

0530

,006

34,5

27

Soc

ial s

cien

ces

125,

351

168,

294

247,

085

272,

982

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

..

40,9

6160

,047

98,6

1293

,112

Oth

er s

ourc

es94

,390

108,

247

148,

473

179,

870

Oth

er s

cien

ces,

n.e

.c.

23,7

0245

,760

97,3

5310

0,41

6

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

..

5,10

023

,856

44,1

1445

,041

Oth

er s

ourc

es18

,602

21,9

0453

,239

55,3

75

aExc

lude

s cu

rren

t dev

elop

men

t exp

endi

ture

s to

talin

g $1

44.2

mill

ion,

or w

hich

the

surv

ey d

id n

ot r

eque

st a

field

ofsc

ienc

e di

strib

utio

n.

Tab

le B

.29.

Cur

reni

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch in

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s, b

y fie

ld o

fsc

ienc

e, s

ourc

e of

fund

s, a

nd ty

pe o

f ins

titut

ion,

197

0

(Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds)

Fie

ld o

f sci

ence

and

sou

rce

of fu

nds

Tot

alIn

stitu

tions

gra

ntin

g-D

octo

rate

Mas

ter's

Bac

helo

r'sN

o sc

ienc

e

degr

ee

Tot

al$2

,712

,233

$2,6

15,1

42$7

4,04

5$1

7,20

4$5

,842

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

1,55

4,71

31,

527,

671

19,4

155,

441

2,18

6

Oth

er s

ourc

es1,

157,

520

1,08

7,47

154

,630

11,7

633,

656

Eng

inee

ring

346,

427

336,

399

7,80

81,

474

746

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

212,

538

209)

373

2,43

147

026

4

Oth

er s

ourc

es13

3,88

912

7,02

65,

377

1,00

448

2

Phy

sica

l sci

ence

s36

8,78

935

1,15

912

,740

4,67

321

7

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

264,

649

258,

299

4,10

62,

105

139

Oth

er s

ourc

es10

4,14

092

,860

8,63

42,

568

78

nn

a sc

tenc

130,

277

124,

506

3,53

744

6'1

,788

Page 102: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

..

Oth

er s

ourc

es

Life

sci

ence

s

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

Oth

er s

ourc

es

Psy

chol

ogy

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

Oth

er s

ourc

es

Soc

ial s

cien

ces

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

Oth

er s

ourc

es

Oth

er s

cien

ces,

n.e

.c.

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent .

Oth

er s

ourc

es

25,1

1823

,128

29,6

5731

,548

39,9

4 i

39,1

77

,4 r

o6b

54,7

77

794,

967

981,

113

1,16

9,39

01,

311,

366

443,

389

577,

006

703,

125

767,

053

351,

578

404,

107

466,

265

544,

313

43,9

8555

,487

77,4

6479

,532

26,9

9333

,482

47,4

5845

,005

16,9

9222

,005

30,0

0634

,527

125,

351

168,

294

247,

085

272,

982

40,9

6160

,047

98,6

1293

,112

84,3

9010

8,24

714

8,47

317

9,87

0

23,7

0245

,760

97,3

5310

0,41

6

5,10

023

,856

44,1

1445

,041

18,6

0221

,904

53,2

3955

,375

,--

aExc

lude

s cu

rren

t dev

elop

men

t exp

endi

ture

s to

talin

g $1

442

mill

ion,

for

whi

ch th

e su

rvey

did

not r

eque

st a

field

of.s

cien

ce d

istr

ibut

ion.

Tab

le 1

329.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch in

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s, b

y fie

ld o

fsc

ienc

e, s

ourc

e of

fund

s, a

nd ty

pe o

f ins

titut

ion,

197

0

(Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds)

Fie

ld o

f sci

ence

and

sou

rce

of fu

nds

Tot

alIn

stitu

tions

gra

ntin

g.D

octo

rate

Mas

ter's

Bac

helo

r'sN

o sc

ienc

e

degr

ee

Tot

al$2

,712

,233

$2,6

15,1

42$7

4,04

5$1

7,20

4$5

,842

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

1,55

4,71

31,

527,

671

19,4

155,

441

2,18

6O

ther

sou

rces

1,15

7,52

01,

087,

471

54,6

3011

,763

3,65

6

Eng

inee

ring

346,

427

336,

399

7,80

81,

474

746

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

212,

538

209,

373

2,43

147

026

4

Oth

er s

ourc

es13

3,88

912

7,02

65,

377

1,00

448

2

Phy

sica

l sci

ence

s36

8,78

935

1,15

912

,740

4,67

321

7

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

264,

649

258,

299

4,10

62,

105

139

Oth

er s

ourc

es10

4,14

092

,860

8,63

42,

568

78

Evn

ironm

enta

l sci

ence

s13

0,27

712

4,50

63,

537

446

1,78

8

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

79,6

4877

,064

1,16

418

91,

231

Oth

er s

ourc

es50

,629

47,4

422,

373

257

557

Mat

hem

atic

s10

2,44

494

,144

6,21

71,

620

463

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

47,6

6746

,749

467

412

39

Oth

er s

ourc

es54

,777

47,3

955,

750

1,20

842

4

Life

Sci

ence

s1,

311,

366

1,29

3,17

013

,973

2,99

41,

229

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

767,

053

760,

824

4,93

61,

005

288

Oth

er s

ourc

es54

4,31

353

2,34

69,

037

1,98

994

1

Psy

chol

ogy

79,5

3271

,340

6,68

71,

327

178

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

45,0

0542

,807

1,77

839

822

Oth

er s

ourc

es34

,527

28,5

334,

909

929

156

Soc

ial s

cien

ces

272,

982'

249,

401

18,5

614,

001

1,01

9

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

93,1

1289

,166

3,14

064

216

4

Oth

er s

ourc

es17

9,87

016

0,23

515

,421

3,35

985

5

Oth

er s

cien

ces,

n.e

.c.

100,

416

95,0

234,

522

669

202

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

45,0

4143

,389

1,39

322

039

Oth

er s

ourc

es55

,375

51,6

343,

129

449

163

Page 103: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le B

-30.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch in

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s, b

y S

tate

and

fiel

d of

sci

ence

, 197

0

( D

olla

s in

thou

sand

s]

Sta

teT

otal

Eng

inee

ring

Phy

sica

lsc

ienc

esE

nviro

nmen

tal

scie

nces

Mat

hem

atic

sLi

fesc

ienc

esP

sych

olog

yS

ocia

lsc

ienc

esO

ther

scie

nces

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l$2

,712

,233

$346

.427

$368

,789

$130

,277

$102

,444

$1,3

11,3

66$7

9.53

2$2

72,9

82$1

00,4

16N

ew E

ngla

nd30

5.29

359

.476

54,7

3124

,571

10,2

4010

8,46

17,

553

36.5

853,

676

Mai

ne4,

383

435

200

279

135

2,59

722

551

2N

ew H

amps

hire

11.1

351.

163

2,32

722

031

65,

279

293

723

814

Ver

mon

t6,

784

267

394

1,23

210

53,

603

350

682

151

Mas

sach

uset

ts20

6,55

051

.753

40,6

9721

,025

6.83

557

,332

4,18

023

,110

1,61

8R

hode

Isla

nd14

,643

2,44

22,

932

551

1,88

53,

833

595

1,97

343

2C

onne

ctic

ut61

.798

3,41

68,

181

1,26

496

435

,817

1,91

09,

585

661

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

528.

598

58,3

0874

,682

24,8

0719

,229

262,

019

16,3

7649

,458

23,7

19N

ew Y

ork

319,

329

29.4

3641

,183

15,0

909,

924

177,

439

9,21

925

.452

11,5

86N

ew J

erse

y54

.028

9,64

611

,579

2,89

12,

733

14,3

382,

689

8,38

51,

767

Pen

nsyl

vani

a15

5,24

119

,226

21,9

206,

826

6.57

230

,242

4,46

8'

15,6

2110

,366

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al46

7,63

271

,017

63,2

7817

,394

188,

397

19,1

1765

,895

19,9

28O

hio

91,5

1216

,364

9,60

41

,882

2,56

746

,495

.2.

585

6,44

15,

574

Indi

ana

58,6

867,

841

10,4

002,

291

3,08

926

,597

1,79

26,

060

616

Illin

ois

125,

610

17,5

7919

,769

3,93

57,

606

49,7

583,

446

20,3

503,

167

Mic

higa

n10

3,09

623

,787

10,5

292,

484

4,21

134

,348

6.56

218

,504

2,67

1W

isco

nsin

88.7

285.

446

12,9

766,

802

5,13

331

,199

4,73

214

,540

7,90

0W

est N

orth

Cen

tral

227,

311

20,9

0318

,060

9,58

88,

244

126,

720

5,86

226

,555

11,3

79M

inne

sota

47,1

284,

502

5.07

41

,079

1,54

726

,469

1,48

13,

702

3,27

4Io

wa

36,2

774,

417

4,49

754

51,

803

18,9

3171

05,

036

338

Mis

sour

i70

,265

6,19

63,

952

3.59

02,

121

37,4

981,

087

10,1

425,

679

Nor

th D

akot

a6,

177

372

572

6993

3,90

280

1,05

0'39

Sou

th D

akot

a10

,590

775

724

1,50

412

46,

683

7828

042

2N

ebra

ska

22,3

211,

408

1,17

1"

361

1,73

114

,973

245

2,18

424

8K

ansa

s34

.553

3.23

32.

070

2,44

082

518

.264

2,18

14.

161

1,37

9S

outh

Atla

ntic

333,

307

33,0

3037

,155

=11

,182

12,3

9419

1,71

87,

026

24,7

7716

,025

Del

awar

e6,

480

1,35

21,

167

131

320

1,61

722

61,

291

376

Mar

ylan

d59

,382

4.17

58,

871

3,63

32,

944

34,1

9873

32,

380

2,44

8D

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

a .

..

.29

,609

2,08

83.

217

200

572

15,3

4563

35,

577

1,97

7V

irgin

ia32

.231

4,89

13,

557

1,37

098

217

,219

715

2,06

11,

436

Wes

t Virg

inia

12,0

961,

614

1,39

347

629

56,

780

305

893

340

Nor

th C

arol

ina

65.6

522,

283

6,30

61,

180

1,66

643

,142

1.45

13,

288

6,33

6S

ou th

Car

olin

a11

.897

1,55

382

734

341

67,

653

141

822

142

Geo

rgia

53,2

886,

989

4,41

51,

864

3,03

329

,052

1,61

05,

235

1,09

0F

lorid

a62

.672

8,08

57,

402

1,98

52,

166

36,7

121,

212

3,23

01,

880

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al98

,266

8.22

74,

999

3,74

71,

749

62,9

435,

341

8,53

22,

728

Ken

tuck

y20

,125

1,20

21,

086

2,63

539

611

,327

1,29

71,

730

452

Ten

ness

ee36

,570

3,09

62,

267

289

653

23,8

313,

493

1,83

11,

110

Ala

bam

a25

,034

2,77

21,

148

430

433

16.6

4023

32,

311

1,06

7M

issi

ssip

pi16

.537

1,15

749

839

3 w

267

11,1

4531

82,

660

99W

est S

outh

Cen

tral

194,

868

23,6

4920

,489

10,5

177,

156

108,

960

3,47

514

,936

5,78

6A

rkan

sas

10,4

7471

172

180

518

17,

000

241

768

47Lo

uisi

ana

40,4

682,

793

3,14

91,

197

1,58

525

,321

332

3,64

32.

448

Okl

ahom

a21

,728

3,64

21,

607

863

1,30

916

,177

343

2,89

289

5T

exas

122,

198

16,4

0315

,012

7.'4

'52

4,08

166

,462

2,55

97,

633

2,39

6M

ount

ain

142.

619

27.2

4320

.800

7,70

04,

051

55.7

195,

242

13,3

998,

465

Mon

tana

10,6

13L0

951.

119

357

372

4,54

242

61,

807

895

Page 104: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

,-I'4

,000

.4,1

."0.

1,

,,

Pen

nsyl

vani

a15

5,24

119

,226

21,9

206,

826

6,57

270

,242

4,46

815

,621

10,3

66E

ast N

orth

Cen

tral

467,

632

71,0

1763

,278

17,3

9422

,606

188,

397

19,1

1765

,895

19,9

28O

hio

91,5

1216

,364

9,60

41,

882

2,56

746

,495

2,58

56,

441

5,57

4In

dian

a58

,686

7,84

110

,400

2,29

13,

089

26,5

971,

792

6,06

061

6Ill

inoi

s12

5,61

017

,579

19,7

693,

935

7,60

649

,758

3,44

620

,350

3,i6

7M

ichi

gan

103,

096

23,7

8710

,529

2,48

44,

211

34,3

486,

562

18,5

042,

671

Wis

cons

in88

,728

5,44

612

,976

6,80

25,

133

31,1

994,

732

14.5

407,

900

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al22

7,31

120

,903

18,0

609,

588

t,8,

244

126,

720

5,86

226

,555

11,3

79M

inne

sota

47,1

284,

502

::.07

41,

079

1,54

726

,469

1,48

13,

702

3,27

4Io

wa

36,2

774,

417

4,49

754

51,

803

18,9

3171

05,

036

338

Mis

sour

i70

,265

6,19

63,

952

3,59

02,

121

37,4

981,

087

10,1

425,

679

Nor

th D

akot

a6,

177

372

572

6993

3,90

280

1,05

039

Sou

th D

akot

a10

,590

775

724

1,50

412

46,

683

7828

042

2N

ebra

ska

22,3

211,

408

1,17

136

11,

731

14,9

7324

52,

184

248

Kan

sas

34.5

533,

233

2,07

02,

440

825

18,2

642,

181

4,16

11,

379

Sou

th A

tlant

ic33

3,30

733

,030

37,1

55=

11,1

8212

,394

191,

718

7,02

624

,777

16,0

25D

elaw

are

6,48

01,

352

1,16

713

132

01,

617

226

1,29

137

6M

aryl

and

59,3

824,

175

8,87

13,

633

2,94

434

,198

733

2,38

02,

448

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

..

.29

,609

2,08

83,

217

200

572

15,3

4563

35,

577

1,97

7V

irgin

ia32

,231

4,89

13,

557

1,37

098

217

,219

715

2,06

11,

436

Wes

t Virg

inia

12,0

961,

614

1,39

347

629

56,

780

305

, 893

340

Nor

th C

arol

ina

65,6

522,

283

6,30

61,

180

'1,6

6643

,142

1,45

13,

288

6,33

6S

outh

Car

olin

a11

,897

1,55

382

734

341

67,

653

141

822

142

Geo

rgia

53,2

886,

989

4,41

51,

864

3,03

329

,052

1,61

05,

235

1,09

0F

lorid

a62

,672

8,08

57,

402

1,98

52,

166

36,7

121,

212

3,23

01,

880

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al98

,266

8,22

74,

999

3,74

71,

749

62,9

435,

341

8,53

22,

728

Ken

tuck

y20

,125

1,20

21,

086

2,63

539

611

.327

1,29

71,

730

452

Ten

ness

ee36

,570

3,09

62,

267

289

653

23,8

313,

493

1,83

11,

110

Ala

bam

a25

,034

2,77

21,

148

430

433

16,6

4023

32,

311

1,06

7M

issi

ssip

pi16

,537

1,15

749

839

326

711

,145

318

2,66

099

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al19

4,86

823

,549

20,4

8910

,517

7.15

610

8,96

03,

475

14,9

365,

786

Ark

ansa

s10

,474

711

721

805

181

7,00

024

176

847

Loui

sian

a40

,468

2,79

33,

149

1,19

71,

585

25,3

2133

23,

643

2.44

8O

klah

oma

21,7

283,

642

1,60

786

31,

309

1d,1

7734

32,

892

895

Tex

as12

2,19

816

,403

15,0

127,

652

4,08

166

,462

2,55

97,

633

2,39

6M

ount

ain

142,

619

27,2

4320

,800

7,70

04,

051

55,7

195,

242

13,3

998,

465

Mon

tana

10,6

131,

095

1,11

935

737

24,

542

426

1,80

789

5Id

aho

4,85

056

534

997

632,

929

3441

340

0W

yom

ing

6,83

962

71,

379

993

152

463

759

539

1,92

7C

olor

ado

54,8

139,

137

7,23

61,

987

1,41

726

,249

1,93

63,

584

3,26

7N

ew M

exic

o15

,466

7,66

81,

538

1,60

245

5.

2,35

742

41,

133

289

Ariz

ona

20,5

263,

526

5,60

11,

734

720

5,18

085

12,

906

8U

tah

23,4

513,

857

2,76

064

065

510

,989

644

2,44

71,

459

Nev

ada

6,06

176

881

829

021

73,

010

168

570

220

Pac

ific

403,

500

43,8

8674

,080

20,3

1816

,550

198,

364

9,28

032

,395

8,62

7W

ashi

ngto

n57

,035

6,44

66,

209

5,79

11,

189

29,6

281,

608

3,59

82,

566

Ore

gon

35,9

041,

278

4,25

73,

436

1,47

520

,673

1,15

12,

217

1,41

7C

alifo

rnia

282,

277

34,0

0860

,152

6,91

813

,427

134,

117

5,92

023

,569

4,16

6A

lask

a9,

724

1,23

41,

352

479

306

4,94

824

978

437

2H

awai

i18

,560

920

2,11

03,

694

153

8,99

835

22,

227

106

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

10,8

3978

851

545

322

58,

065

260

450

83

Page 105: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le 1

3.31

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r in

stru

ctio

n in

the

scie

nces

and

eng

inee

ring

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd c

olle

ges,

by

Sta

te a

nd fi

eld

of s

cien

ce, 1

970

I Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds]

Sta

teT

otal

Eng

inee

ring

Phy

sica

l and

envi

ronm

enta

lsc

ienc

esM

athe

mat

ics

Life

scie

nces

Psy

chol

ogy

Soc

ial

scie

nces

Oth

ersc

ienc

es

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l$4

,064

,163

$512

,828

$622

,042

$366

,649

S1,

286,

674

$228

,120

S93

9,11

0S

108,

740

New

Eng

land

379,

746

52,0

7158

,490

27,8

4211

9,24

618

,505

96,2

137,

379

Mai

ne12

,132

1,88

22,

088

1,31

12,

375

785

3,67

516

New

Ham

pshi

re16

,753

1,79

02,

903

1,37

94,

974

1,02

64,

314

367

Ver

mon

t16

,784

1,25

82,

389

1,20

55,

524

717

5,17

152

0

Mas

sach

uset

ts23

3,96

238

,381

38,3

9617

,048

77,4

8710

,756

47,7

134,

181

Rho

de Is

land

17,7

412,

094

2,42

11,

923

2,75

51,

085

6,71

574

8

Con

nect

icut

82,3

746,

666

10,2

934,

976

26,1

314,

136

28,6

251,

547

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

783,

916

100,

903

119,

142

69,9

3423

7,80

444

,638

182,

715

28,7

80

New

Yor

k43

6,03

656

,402

67,0

5138

,590

132,

860

25,3

9710

0,00

915

,727

New

Jer

sey

85,1

4012

,323

13,6

1410

.12C

20,4

155,

255

22,6

36,7

7

Pen

nsyl

vani

a26

2,74

032

,178

38,4

7721

,224

84,5

2913

,986

60,0

7012

,276

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al78

4,86

510

0,05

712

3,80

371

,649

237,

154

49,0

9118

8,66

514

,446

Ohi

o16

1,03

920

,427

25,6

5015

,371

55,0

6812

,190

30,4

991,

834

Indi

ana

109,

900

16,4

4421

,263

11,8

5730

,475

6,76

222

,282

817

Illin

ois

223,

383

20,8

0831

.795

19,5

1673

,142

12,2

0558

,118

7,79

9

Mic

higa

n18

6,19

029

,505

26,7

8715

,778

.54

,729

10,9

7845

,075

3.33

8

Wis

cons

in10

4,35

312

,873

18,3

089,

127

23,7

406,

956

32,6

9165

8

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al35

3,14

436

,940

50,7

4134

,363

101,

684

17,7

5510

1,71

89,

943

Min

neso

ta77

,051

5,74

811

,753

5,87

925

,067

4,35

421

,080

3,17

0Io

wa

67,6

167,

892

9,22

05,

905

21,6

063,

352

18,7

7586

6

Mis

sour

i96

,453

10,9

5913

,998

#13

,483

25,9

864,

151

27,2

0966

7

Nor

th D

akot

a16

,568

1,72

12,

165

945

3,98

762

47,

059

67

Sou

th D

akot

a10

,645

1,45

21,

642

942

2,83

363

32,

088

1,05

5

Neb

rask

a31

,048

2,87

64,

316

2,58

110

,015

1,66

58,

909

686

Kan

sas

53,7

636,

292

7,64

74,

628

12,1

902,

976

16,5

983,

432

Sou

th A

tlant

ic ..

....

.50

0,61

762

,637

74,1

0350

,002

168,

359

27,3

8310

3,76

314

,370

Del

awar

e12

,405

2,23

92,

356

1,50

31,

793

603

3,07

983

2

Mar

ylan

d65

,830

7,60

411

,973

?,89

422

,480

3,25

912

,310

310'

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

..

.42

,243

5,61

65,

195

2,99

616

,566

1,79

69,

282

792

Virg

inia

62,8

118,

972

9,82

66,

804

18,0

213,

597

13,7

851,

806

Wes

t Virg

inia

32,8

154,

02'

3,71

11,

474

17,4

021,

233

4,52

245

2

Nor

th C

arol

ina

85,9

167,

612

12,7

859,

101

27,4

745,

391

19,0

554,

498

Sou

th C

arol

ina

34,0

297,

209

5,18

23,

779

9,35

41,

684

- 5,

826

995

Geo

rgia

81,1

347,

679

10,4

587,

241

30,0

165,

428

18,2

422,

070

Flo

rida

83,4

3411

,685

12,6

179,

210

25,2

534,

392

17,6

622,

615

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al19

1,34

822

,705

23,5

9615

,814

69,4

6513

,656

39,2

996,

813

Ken

tuck

y49

,112

3.33

15,

319

3,07

621

,538

5,22

38,

389

2,23

6T

enne

ssee

60,6

198,

710

8,02

05,

456

21,6

184,

795

11,2

0781

3

Ala

bam

a55

,442

6,91

07,

118

4,80

716

,698

2,31

614

,149

3,44

4

Mis

siss

ippi

26,1

753,

754

3,13

92,

475

9,61

11,

322

5,55

432

0

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al28

7,16

135

,379

47,4

6427

,228

96,8

0514

,426

58,3

017,

558

Ark

ansa

s17

,315

1,89

32,

877

1,79

35,

505

1,02

63,

904

317

Loui

sian

a51

,464

5,36

27,

210

4,88

623

,291

1,83

98,

624

252

Okl

ahom

a38

,442

6.05

86,

256

3,46

610

,128

2,27

19,

151

T,1

12

Page 106: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

4:6

00

aV

rif,

I

Ohi

oIn

dian

aIll

inoi

sM

ichi

gan

Wis

cons

in

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

alM

inne

sota

Iow

aM

isso

uri

Nor

th D

akot

aS

outh

Dak

ota

Neb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sou

th A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

Mar

ylan

dD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

a .

Virg

inia

Wes

t Virg

inia

Nor

th C

arol

ina

Sou

th C

arol

ina

Geo

rgia

Flo

riJa

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

Ala

bam

aM

issi

ssip

pi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

alA

rkan

sas

Loui

sian

aO

klah

oma

Tex

as

Mou

ntai

nM

onta

naId

aho

Wyo

min

gC

olor

ado

New

Mex

ico

Ariz

ona

Uta

hN

evad

a

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

i

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

/0,

:Jlv

v.V

.iI16

1,03

920

,427

25,6

5015

,371

55,0

6812

,190

30,4

991,

834

109,

900

16,4

4421

,263

11,8

5730

,475

6,76

222

,282

817

223,

383

20,8

0831

,795

19,5

1673

,142

12,2

0558

,118

7,79

918

6,19

029

.505

26,7

8715

,778

54.7

2910

,978

45,0

753.

338

104,

353

12,8

7318

.308

*

9.12

723

.740

6,95

632

,691

658

353,

144

36,9

4050

,741

34,3

6310

1,68

417

,755

101,

718

9,94

377

.051

5,74

811

.753

5.87

925

,067

4,35

421

,080

3.17

067

,616

7,89

29.

220

5,90

521

,606

3.35

218

,775

866

96,4

5310

,959

13,9

9813

,483

25,9

864,

151

27,2

0966

716

,568

1,72

12,

165

945

3,98

762

4i7,

059

6710

,645

1,45

21,

642

942

2,83

363

32,

088

1,05

531

,048

2,87

64,

316

2,58

110

,015

1,66

58,

909

686

53,7

636.

292

7,64

74.

628

12,1

902,

976

16,5

983,

132

500,

617

62,6

3774

,103

50,0

0216

8,35

927

.383

103,

763

14.3

7012

,405

2,23

92,

356

1,50

31,

793

603

3,07

983

265

,830

7,60

411

,973

7,89

422

.480

3,25

912

,310

310

42,2

435.

616

5.19

52,

996

16,5

661,

796

9,28

279

2

62.8

118,

972

9.82

66,

804

18.0

213,

597

13,7

851,

806

32,8

154,

021

3,71

11,

474

17,4

021,

233

4,52

245

285

,916

7,61

212

,785

9.10

127

,474

5,39

119

,055

4,49

834

,029

7,20

95,

182

3,77

99,

354

1,68

45,

826

995

81,1

347,

679

10,4

587,

241

30,0

165,

428

18,2

422,

070

83,4

3411

.685

12.6

179,

210

25,2

534,

392

17,6

622,

615

191.

348

22,7

0523

,596

15,8

1469

,465

13,6

5639

,299

6,81

349

,112

3,33

15,

319

3.07

621

.538

5,22

38,

389

2,23

660

,619

8,71

08.

020

5,45

621

,618

4.79

511

.207

813

55,4

426,

910

7,11

84

807

16.6

982.

316

14,1

493,

444

26,1

753,

754

3,13

92,

475

9.61

11,

322

5,55

432

0

287,

161

35,3

7947

,464

27,2

2896

.805

14,4

2658

,301

7,55

8

17,3

151,

893

2,87

71,

793

5,50

51.

026

3,90

431

751

,464

5,36

27,

210

4,88

623

,291

1,83

98,

624

252

38,4

426,

058

6.25

63,

466

10,1

282.

271

9,15

11,

112

179,

940

22,0

6631

,121

17.0

8357

,861

9,29

Q36

,622

5,87

7

180,

457

27,0

6930

.598

18,0

2844

,246

12,6

7840

,208

7,63

017

,337

1,79

72,

362

1,48

04,

829

989

3,96

71,

913

9,36

61,

562

2,03

394

3. 2

,540

510

1,70

969

8,16

91,

217

1,89

767

41,

068

909

894

1,96

060

,192

7,85

89.

532

6,16

915

,243

4,25

713

,959

';,17

412

,285

2,17

12,

402

1,82

12,

596

622

2.65

221

40,6

287,

559

6,13

63,

978

8,11

8'

3,80

610

,892

139

26.1

814,

114

5,46

92,

464

7,83

51.

240

4,83

822

1

5,84

979

176

749

92,

017

345

1.29

713

3

578.

213

72,5

9790

,926

50,5

0719

8,64

728

,941

125,

081

11,5

14

83,4

209,

692

12,1

336,

040

34.6

864,

286

14,7

261,

857

47,2

663,

169

7.56

74.

822

17,4

242.

370

7,69

54.

219

431,

409

57,9

5468

,446

38,3

6114

1,21

921

,394

98,7

095,

326

3,65

644

855

726

61,

319

223

759

84

12,4

621,

334

2.22

31,

018

3,99

966

83,

192

28

24.6

962,

470

3,17

91.

282

13,2

641,

047

3,14

730

7

Page 107: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

0

Tab

le 8

-32.

Cur

rent

G,:p

endi

ture

s fo

r in

stru

ctio

n in

the

scie

nces

and

engi

neer

ing

in u

nive

rsiti

es a

ndco

llege

s, b

y fie

ld o

f sci

ence

and

type

of i

nstit

utio

n. 1

970

(Dol

lars

on

thou

sand

s)

Fie

ld o

f sci

ence

Tot

al

Inst

itutio

ns g

rant

ing

Doc

tora

teM

aste

r'sB

ache

lor's

No

scie

nce

degr

eeT

otal

64,0

64.1

6362

.688

.853

S52

8,36

763

75;8

0364

71,1

40E

ngin

eerin

g51

2,82

837

E32

6I

49.4

1017

,459

70.6

33P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal

scie

nces

622,

042

369,

799

104.

828

77,4

5469

.961

Mat

hem

atic

s36

6.64

918

4,73

764

,178

48,3

6669

.368

Life

sci

ence

s1,

286,

674

1.04

1,98

682

,930

67,3

4794

.411

Psy

chol

ogy

228,

120

108.

423

51,2

8235

,042

33.3

73S

ocia

l sci

ence

s93

9.11

054

3,82

015

7.35

912

1.75

911

6,17

2O

ther

sci

ence

s, n

.e.c

.10

8,74

064

,762

18,3

808.

37t1

17,2

22

Tab

le 8

33. C

apita

l exp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch, d

evel

opm

ent,

and

inst

ruct

ion

in th

e sc

ienc

es a

nd e

ngin

eerin

gin

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s, b

y ty

pe o

f ins

titut

ion,

sou

rce

of fu

nds.

and

pur

pose

, 197

0

(Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds!

Tot

al c

apita

l exp

endi

ture

sR

&D

and

gra

duat

e in

stru

ctio

nU

nder

grad

uate

inst

ruct

ion

Fed

eral

Oth

erF

eder

alO

ther

Fed

eral

Oth

erT

ype

of in

stitu

tion

Tot

alG

over

nmen

tso

urce

sT

otal

Gov

ernm

ent

sour

ces

Tot

alG

over

nmen

tso

urce

sT

otal

S95

1,87

362

79,3

1656

72,5

57$5

05,8

85$1

79,7

1863

26.1

6754

45,9

88S

99.5

98$3

46,3

90D

octo

rate

735.

333

22::1

3051

2,00

348

0.10

016

9.65

731

0.44

325

5.23

353

,673

201.

560

Mas

ter's

83,0

1720

,648

62,3

6919

,272

6,96

712

,305

63,7

4513

,681

50,0

64B

ache

lor's

68,1

0625

.724

42.3

824,

/11

2,61

42.

097

63.3

9523

,110

40.2

85N

o sc

ienc

e de

gree

. .65

.417

9.61

455

.803

1.80

248

01.

322

63.6

159,

134

54,4

81

Page 108: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le B

34. C

apita

l exp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch, d

evel

opm

ent,

and

inst

ruct

ion

inth

e sc

ienc

es a

nd e

ngin

eerin

g in

univ

ersi

ties

and

colle

ges,

by

Sta

te, s

ourc

e of

fund

s, a

nd p

urpo

se, 1

970

(Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds(

Sta

teT

otal

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l$9

51.8

73

New

Eng

land

81,6

45M

aine

1.31

4N

ew H

amps

hire

7.82

1V

erm

ont

5,84

7M

assa

chus

etts

39,1

83R

hode

Isla

nd2,

495

Con

nect

icut

24.9

85

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

190,

202

New

Yor

k99

,125

New

Jer

sey

25,3

78P

enns

ylva

nia

65.6

99

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al17

0.74

0O

hio

37,8

77In

dian

a26

,982

Illin

ois

37.0

87

Mic

higa

n47

,342

Wis

cons

in21

,452

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al90

,606

Min

neso

ta31

,047

Iow

a14

,265

Mis

sour

i26

,310

Nor

th D

akot

a1.

003

Sou

th D

akot

a2,

745

Neb

rask

a7.

077

Kan

sas

8,15

9

Sou

th A

tlant

ic13

4,81

1tn

Del

awar

e3,

470

Mar

ylan

d11

,963

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

7,25

9V

irgin

ia22

.304

Wes

t Virg

inia

5,21

2N

orth

Car

olin

a39

,196

Sou

th C

arol

ina

4,85

9G

eorg

ia20

,775

Flo

rida

19,7

73

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al44

.011

Ken

tuck

y17

,614

Ten

ness

ee7,

848

Ala

bam

a12

.635

Mis

siss

ippi

5,91

4

All

sour

ces

Fed

eral

gov

ernm

ent

R&

D a

ndgr

adua

tein

stru

ctio

nU

nder

grad

uate

inst

ruct

ion

Tot

al

R&

D a

ndgr

adua

tein

stru

ctio

nU

nder

grad

uate

inst

ruct

ion

S50

5,88

5$4

45,9

88$2

79,3

16$1

79,7

18S

99,

598

46.6

0035

.045

15.5

2910

.553

4,97

613

1,30

130

25

297

3.85

63,

965

1,50

493

656

8

2,06

53.

782

1.08

964

044

9

25.6

5013

,533

7,45

75,

705

1.75

2

1,67

582

01.

399

945

454

13.3

4111

,644

3,77

82,

322

1,45

6

122,

144

68,0

5844

.816

31.3

2713

,489

68,5

1330

.612

17,8

2011

.847

5.97

3

17.1

878,

191

7,03

96.

470

569

36.4

4429

.255

19.9

5713

,010

6.94

7

85.5

2485

,216

50,0

5830

.674

19,3

84

19,1

5018

,727

12,9

296,

992

5.93

7

15.1

7111

,811

10.4

676,

643

3,82

418

.519

18,5

68 .

8.79

24.

980

3,81

2

27,0

9320

,249

16,0

4211

,087

4,95

55.

591

15.8

611.

828

972

856

42,6

7947

,927

23,6

4315

,057

8,58

6

6,75

624

,291

5,18

02,

719

2.46

1

10,5

273.

738

5.16

34.

412

751

18,1

988,

112

5.50

94,

234

1.27

570

230

156

641

615

0

1,87

487

11,

1E14

177

326

8

2,83

04.

247

2,74

81,

175

1.57

3

1,79

26,

367

3,43

61.

328

2,10

8

70.1

0164

,710

45,5

9128

.397

17,1

94

1.90

11,

569

401

181

220

6,31

55,

648

5,30

93,

494

1,81

5

4,28

02,

979

3,88

13,

387

494

10,2

1112

.093

5,28

23.

530

1,75

262

54.

587

2,38

832

12.

067

20,0

9619

,100

16,2

7110

.537

5,73

41,

708

3.15

11.

896

848

1,04

8

13.4

807,

295

3,06

71.

375

1,69

2

11;4

158,

288

7,09

64,

724

2,37

2

23,0

7620

,935

17,0

0612

,712

4,29

4

13,1

334.

481

7,17

97.

004

175

2,69

55,

153

2.47

01,

501

969

5.14

47,

491

5,15

83,

285

1.87

3

2,10

43,

810

2,19

992

21,

277

4 cg

1

Oth

er s

ourc

es

Tot

al

R&

D a

ndgr

adua

teU

nder

grad

uate

inst

ruct

ion

inst

ruct

ion

$672

,557

$326

,167

$346

,390

66,1

161,

012

6,31

74,

758

31,7

261,

096

21,2

07

36.0

4730

,069

81,

004

2,92

03.

397

1.42

53,

333

19,9

4511

,781

730

366

11.0

1910

,188

145,

386

81.3

0518

.339

45.7

42

90,8

1754

,569

56.6

6624

,639

10,7

177,

622

23.4

3422

,308

120,

682

24.9

4816

.515

28.2

9531

,300

19.6

24

842:

1588

8.52

8

65,8

32i

12,1

58

16,0

0615

,294

147;

9758

6713

,539

4.61

915

,005

66,9

6325

,867

9,10

220

.801 43

71,

704

4.32

94.

723

27,6

2239

.341

4.03

721

.830

6.11

52.

987

:3,9

646.

837

286

151

1.10

160

31,

655

2.13

7446

44.

259

89.2

203,

069

6,65

43.

378

1 7.

022

2,82

422

,925

2.96

317

,708

12,6

77

41,7

0447

,516

1,72

01,

349

2,82

13,

833

893

2,48

56.

681

10.3

4130

42,

520

9.55

913

,366

860

2,10

312

,105

5,60

36,

761

5.91

6

27,0

0510

.364

16.6

41

10,4

356.

129

4,30

65,

378

1,19

44,

184

7.47

71,

859

5,61

83.

715

1,18

22,

533

7 88

321

.744

16,1

39

Page 109: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Pen

nsyl

vani

a

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

alO

hio

Indi

ana

Illin

ois

Mic

higa

nW

isco

nsin

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

alM

inne

sota

Iow

aM

isso

uri

Nor

th D

akot

aS

outh

Dak

ota

Neb

rask

aK

ansa

s

Sou

th A

tlant

icD

elaw

are

Mar

ylan

dD

istr

ict o

f Col

umbi

aV

irgin

iaW

est V

irgin

iaN

orth

Car

olin

aS

outh

Car

olin

aG

eorg

iaF

lorid

a

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al

Ken

tuck

yT

enne

ssee

Ala

bam

aM

issi

ssip

pi

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

alA

rkan

sas

Loui

sian

aO

klah

oma

Tex

as

Mou

ntai

nM

onta

naId

aho

Wyo

min

gC

olor

ado

New

Mex

ico

Ariz

ona

Uta

hN

evad

a

Pac

ific

Was

hing

ton

Ore

gon

Cal

iforn

iaA

lask

aH

awai

i

Out

lyin

g ar

eas

65,6

9936

,444

29.2

5519

.95/

13,6

1 U

6,94

/45

, 742

1.0,

404

.2-,

L)

170,

740

85,5

24I .

85.2

1650

,058

30,6

7419

,384

120,

682

54,8

5065

,832

37,8

7726

,982

37,0

87

19,1

501

5,1

71

18,5

19

18,7

2711

,811

1

18,5

68

12,9

2910

.467

8,79

2

6,99

26,

643

4,98

0

5,93

73,

824

3,81

2

24,9

4816

,515

28,2

95

12,1

588,

528

13,5

39

12,7

907,

987

14,7

56

47,3

4227

,093

20,2

4916

,042

11,0

874,

955

31,3

0016

,006

15,2

94

21,4

525,

591

15,8

611,

828

972

856

19,6

244,

619

15,0

05

90,6

0642

,679

47,9

2723

,643

15,0

578,

586

66,9

6327

,622

39,3

41

31,0

476,

756

24,2

915,

180

2,71

92,

461

25,8

674,

037

21.8

30

14,2

6510

,527

3,73

85,

163

4,41

275

19,

102

6,11

52,

987

26,3

1018

,198

8,11

25,

509

4,23

41,

275

20,8

0113

,964

6,83

71.

003

702

301

566

416

150

437

286

151

2,74

51,

874

871

1,04

177

326

81,

704

1,10

160

3

7,07

72,

830

4,24

72,

748

1,17

51,

573

4,32

91,

655

2,67

4

8,15

91,

792

6,36

73,

436

1,32

82,

108

4,72

346

44,

259

134,

811

70,1

0164

,710

45,5

9128

,397

17,1

9489

,220

41,7

0447

.516

3,47

01,

901

1,56

940

118

122

03,

069

1,72

01,

349

11,9

636,

315

5,64

85,

309

3.49

41,

815

6,65

42.

821

3,83

3

7,25

94,

280

2,97

93,

881

3,38

749

43,

378

893

2,48

5

22,3

0410

,211

12,0

935,

282

3,53

01,

752

17,0

226,

681

10,3

41

5,21

262

54,

587

2,38

832

12,

067

2,82

430

42,

520

39,1

9620

,096

19,1

0016

,271

10,5

375,

734

22,9

259,

559

13.3

66

4,85

91,

708

3,15

11,

896

848

1,04

82,

963

860

2,10

3

20,7

7513

,080

7,29

53,

067

1,37

51,

692

17,7

0812

,105

5.60

3

19,7

7311

,485

8,28

87,

096

4,72

42,

372

12,6

776,

761

5.91

6

44,0

1123

,076

20,9

3517

,006

12,7

124,

294

27,0

0510

,364

16.6

41

17,6

1413

,133

4,48

17,

179

7,00

417

510

,435

6,12

94,

306

7,84

82,

695

5,15

32,

470

1,50

196

95,

378

1,19

44,

184

12,6

355,

144

7,49

15,

158

3,28

51,

873

7,47

71,

859

5,61

8

5,91

42.

104

3,81

02.

199

922

1.27

73.

715

1,18

22.

533

54,0

0932

,962

21,0

4716

,126

11,2

184,

908

37,8

8321

,744

16,1

39

2,02

538

11,

644

667

161

506

1,35

8i

220

1,13

89,

187

6,84

82,

339

3,61

42,

577

1,03

75,

573

'4,2

711,

302

4,03

51,

538

2,49

71,

211

487

724

2,82

41,

051

1,77

3

38,7

6224

,195

14,5

67'

10,6

347,

993

2,64

128

,128

16,2

0211

,926

78,5

4533

,621

44,9

2430

,740

16,8

8913

,851

47,8

0516

,732

31,0

73

2,35

11,

072

1,27

9,,

365

310

551,

986

762

1,22

4

1,60

668

891

833

199

232

1,27

558

968

6

4,24

01,

354

2,88

61,

219

332

887

3,02

11,

022

1,99

9

38,4

3911

,705

26,7

3414

,413

4,07

710

,336

24,0

267,

628

16,3

98

3,26

21,

731'

1,53

187

566

820

72,

387

1,06

31,

324

19,2

5612

,065

7,19

19,

949

8,48

41,

465

9,30

73,

581

5,72

6

7,05

84,

323

2,73

52,

948

2,70

724

14,

110

1,61

62,

494

2,33

368

31,

650

640

212

428

1,69

347

11,

222

106,

010

48,2

3557

,775

35,6

4122

,772

12,8

6970

,369

25,4

6344

.906

14,6

978,

789

5,90

82,

607

2,07

153

612

,090

6,71

85,

372

8,28

15,

614

2,66

74,

517

4,29

522

23,

764

1,31

92,

445

69,6

6022

,793

46,8

6723

,274

11,2

9111

,983

46,3

8611

,502

34,8

84

258

168

9011

072

3814

896

52

13,1

1410

,871

2.24

35,

133

5,04

390

7,98

15,

828

2.15

3

1,29

494

335

116

611

947

1,12

882

430

4

Page 110: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le 8

.35.

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t, an

d In

stru

ctio

n in

the

scie

nces

and

engi

neer

ing

in u

nive

rsiti

esan

d co

llege

s, b

y S

tate

, and

sou

rce

of fu

nds,

198

4, 1

988,

198

8, a

nd 1

970

(Dal

in s

in th

ousa

nds)

Tot

al c

apita

exp

endi

ture

sS

tate

1964

1966

1968

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

tota

l$5

29,4

92$6

66,9

97$1

,070

,727

New

Eng

land

39,5

5345

,166

Mai

ne69

688

0N

ew H

amps

hire

3,04

63,

138

Ver

mon

t66

791

6M

assa

chus

etts

21,6

0724

,783

Rho

de Is

land

1,59

61,

810

Con

nect

icut

11,9

4113

,639

Mid

dle

Atla

ntic

New

Yor

kN

ew J

erse

yP

enns

ylva

nia

107,

631

79,3

2310

,072

18,2

36

73,2

281,

507

2.65

42,

967

43,7

286,

212

16,1

60

250,

403

110,

071

32,8

9010

7,44

2E

ast N

orth

Cen

tral

108,

781

109,

549

209,

904

Ohi

o13

,225

20,7

6946

,160

Indi

ana

11,0

7914

,893

28,0

97Ill

inoi

s42

,072

28,8

1364

,852

Mic

higa

n23

,734

25,5

6853

,503

Wis

cons

in18

,671

19,5

0617

,292

Wes

t Nor

th C

entr

al43

,987

Min

neso

ta11

,441

Iow

a12

,202

Mis

sour

i7,

344

Nor

th D

akot

a1,

006

Sou

th D

akot

a1,

581

Neb

rask

a3,

609

Kan

sas

6,80

4S

outh

Atla

ntic

Del

awar

eM

aryl

and

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

Virg

inia

Wes

t Virg

inia

Nor

th C

arol

ina

Sou

th C

arol

ina

Geo

rgia

Flo

rida

54,3

9813

,182

12,7

2810

,874

954

2,66

68,

498

5.49

6

75,3

7718

,893

13,2

4223

,860

2,74

92,

394

7,95

96,

280

43,8

861,

957

6,85

53,

757

4,37

44,

012

7,87

31,

134

4,31

69.

608

78,0

1212

9,74

676

74,

588

17,0

8516

,887

6,31

911

,725

7,63

112

,597

2,88

53,

822

15,5

6730

,789

4,06

95,

962

4,31

610

,612

19,3

7332

,764

Eas

t Sou

th C

entr

al27

,956

27,2

8345

,736

Ken

tuck

y2,

439

5,08

614

,770

Ten

ness

ee11

,702

8,40

316

,164

Ala

bam

a5,

901

10,0

4610

,209

Mis

siss

ippi

7,91

43,

748

4,59

3W

est S

outh

Cen

tral

33,7

9742

,389

88,1

61A

rkan

sas

1,72

12,

217

4,75

7Lo

uisi

ana

5,33

26,

120

15,1

68O

klah

oma

9,29

52,

822

7,53

8T

exas

17,4

4931

,230

60,6

98M

ount

ain

18,2

7461

,661

Mon

tana

627

778

Idah

o,

3:11

01

781

1970

1964

$951

,873

8134

,439

81,6

4513

,164

1,31

419

27,

821

1,48

35,

847

489

39,1

836,

879

2,49

558

324

,985

3,53

8

190,

202

25,6

8999

,125

15,5

0725

,378

2,73

165

,699

7,45

1

170,

740

29,4

4937

,877

3,96

026

,982

3,19

837

,087

8,73

747

,342

8,70

121

,452

4,85

3_

._.._ 90

,606

.._9.

783

31,0

473,

690

14,2

651,

851

26,3

101,

728

1,00

322

72,

745

247

7,07

775

1

8,15

91.

289

134,

811

12,6

943,

470

219

11,9

632,

307

7,25

91,

685

22,3

0466

35,

212

1,51

539

,196

1,76

24,

859

346

20,7

751,

478

19,7

732,

719

44,0

118,

060

17,6

1478

1

7,84

83,

394

12,6

351,

822

5,91

42,

063

54.0

0910

,435

2,02

587

09,

187

2,84

74,

035

1,13

238

,762

5,58

6

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

1966

1968

1970

$212

,397

14,5

55 368

547

553

8,52

232

84,

237

$340

,443

.$2

79,3

16

18,6

4651

262

81,

190

10,2

342,

336

3,74

6

15,5

29 302

1,50

41,

089

7,45

71,

399

3,77

842

,432

71,3

9744

,816

28,2

6131

,482

17,8

204,

064

12,7

027,

039

10,1

0727

,213

19,9

57..

62,2

0350

,058

11,6

0012

,929

11,1

2510

,467

15,7

418,

792

17,7

2016

,042

6,01

71.

828

33,8

78

5,86

86,

407

9,44

37,

831

4,32

9

18,6

465,

341

2,73

45,

358

246

1,07

02,

146

1 75

1

29.6

878,

008

4,22

310

,546 84

883

43,

280

1 94

8

24,9

41 498

6,55

22,

285

1,67

498

64,

362

1,05

41,

422

6,10

8

23.6

435,

180

5,16

35,

509

566

1,04

12,

748

3.43

6

44,7

0745

,591

1,31

640

1

6,04

35,

309

5,56

33,

881

4,87

15,

282

1,28

42,

388

12,4

5316

,271

2,03

31,

896

3,09

73,

067

8,04

77,

096

17,0

067,

179

2,47

05,

158

2,19

9

36,2

9616

,126

2,23

566

75,

291

3,61

41,

396

1,21

127

,374

10.6

34

8,87

21,

852

2,58

82,

679

1,75

3

10,5

823,

017

3,37

83,

023

1,16

4

15,8

9588

71,

730

708

12,5

70

30,7

40 365

331

-

Page 111: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

.-

Eas

t Nor

th C

entr

al10

8,78

110

9,54

920

9,90

417

0,74

029

,449

33,8

7862

,203

50,0

58O

hio

-13

,225

20,7

6946

.160

37,8

773,

960

5,86

811

,800

12,9

29In

dian

a11

,079

14,8

9328

,097

26,9

823,

198

6,40

711

,125

10,4

67Ill

inoi

s42

,072

28,8

1364

,852

37,0

878,

737

9,44

315

,741

8,79

2M

ichi

gan

23,7

3425

,568

53,5

0347

,342

8,70

17,

831

17,7

2016

,042

Wis

cons

in18

,671

19,5

062

17 2

9,

21,4

524,

853

4.32

96.

017

1,82

8W

est N

orth

Cen

tral

43,9

8754

.398

75,3

7790

,806

9,78

318

,646

29,6

8723

.643

Min

neso

taf

11,4

4113

,182

18,8

9331

,047

3,69

05,

341

8,00

85,

180

Iow

a12

.202

12,7

2813

,242

14,2

651,

851

2,73

44,

223

5,16

3M

isso

uri

7,34

410

,874

23,8

6026

,310

1,72

85,

358

10,5

465,

509

Nor

th D

akot

a1,

006

954

2,74

91,

003

227

246

848

566

Sou

th D

akot

a1,

581

2,66

62,

394

2,74

524

71,

070

834

1,04

1N

ebra

ska

3,60

98,

498

7,95

97,

077

751

2,14

63,

280

2,74

8K

ansa

s8.

804

5,49

66,

280

8,15

91,

289

1,75

11,

948

3,43

6S

outh

Atla

ntic

43.8

8678

.012

129,

746

134,

811

12,6

9424

,941

44,7

0745

.591

Del

awar

e1,

957

767

4,58

83,

470

219

498

1,31

640

1M

aryl

and

6,85

517

,085

16,8

8711

,963

2,30

76.

552

6,04

35,

309

Dis

tric

t of C

olum

bia

3,75

76,

319

11,7

257,

259

1,68

52.

285

5,56

33,

881

Virg

inia

4,37

47,

631

12,5

9722

,304

663

1,67

44,

871

5,28

2W

est V

irgin

ia4,

012

2,88

53,

822

5,21

21,

515

986

1.28

42,

388

Nor

th C

arol

ina

7,87

315

,567

30,7

8939

,196

1,76

24,

362

12,4

5316

,271

Sou

th C

arol

ina

1,13

44,

069

5,96

24,

859

346

1,05

42,

033

1,89

6G

eorg

ia4,

316

4,31

610

,612

20,7

751,

478

1,42

23,

097

3,06

7F

lorid

a9.

608

19,3

7332

,764

19,7

732.

719

6.10

88.

047

-- -

7,09

627

,956

27,2

8345

,736

44,0

118,

060

8,87

210

,582

17,0

06E

ast S

outh

Cen

tral

Ken

tuck

y2,

439

5.08

614

,770

17,6

1478

11,

852

3.01

77,

179

Ten

ness

ee11

,702

8,40

316

,164

7,84

83,

394

2,58

83,

378

2,47

0A

laba

ma

5,90

110

,046

10,2

0912

,835

1,82

22,

679

3,02

35,

158

Mis

siss

ippi

7,91

43,

748

4,59

3_

5,91

4__

__2,

063

_1,

753

1,16

42,

199

Wes

t Sou

th C

entr

al33

,797

42,3

8988

,161

54,0

0910

,435

15,8

9536

,296

16,1

26A

rkan

sas

1,72

12.

217

4,75

72,

025

870

887

2.23

566

7Lo

uisi

ana

5.33

26,

120

15,1

689,

187

2,84

7'1

,730

5,29

13,

614

Okl

ahom

a9.

295

2,82

27,

538

4,03

51,

132

708

1.39

61,

211

Tex

as17

.449

31,2

3060

,698

38,7

625,

586

12,5

7027

,374

10,6

34M

ount

ain

18,2

7443

,494

61,6

6178

,545

.5,

474

12,9

6519

,822

30,7

40M

onta

na62

71,

846

778

2,35

122

845

930

736

5Id

aho

3,31

093

71,

781

1,60

681

206

393

331

Wyo

min

g16

654

03,

518

4,24

074

195

1.00

61,

219

Col

orad

o6,

343

12,4

6126

,726

38,4

391,

471

4,88

57,

339

14,4

13N

ew M

exic

o1,

364

9.08

46,

562

3,26

281

81,

414

2,29

387

5A

rizon

a2,

140

14.7

3012

,646

19,2

5672

14,

123

4,52

19,

949

Uta

h3,

916

3,15

08,

479

7,05

81,

849

1,25

93,

633

2,94

8N

evad

a40

874

61,

171

2,33

323

242

433

064

0P

acifi

c10

4,93

712

9,21

813

3,82

310

6,01

019

,396

39,6

9445

,918

35,6

41W

ashi

ngto

n8,

756

11,3

6915

,239

14,6

972,

778

3,29

84,

759

2,60

7O

rego

n4,

082

7,60

512

,164

8,28

12,

407

3,56

1.

5,30

84,

517

Cal

iforn

ia88

,948

106,

921

99,4

5169

,660

12,1

5330

,843

32,4

9923

,274

Ala

ska

982

1,93

597

725

835

21,

810

403

110

Haw

aii

2,16

91,

388

5,99

213

,114

1.70

618

22,

949

5.13

3O

utly

iig a

reas

690

1.41

82,

688

1,29

429

551

91,

189

116

6

Page 112: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Tab

le B

36.'C

apita

l exp

endi

ture

s fo

r re

sear

ch, d

evel

opm

ent,

and

inst

ruct

ion

in th

e sc

ienc

es a

nden

gine

erin

g in

uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s, b

y fie

ld o

f sci

ence

and

type

of i

nstit

utio

n, 1

970

(Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds]

Fie

ld o

f sci

ence

Tot

al

Inst

itutio

ns g

rant

ing

-

Doc

tora

teM

aste

r'sB

ache

lor's

No

scie

nce

degr

ee

Tot

al$9

51,8

73$7

35,3

33$8

3,01

7$6

8,10

6$6

5,41

7E

ngin

eerin

g13

2,62

395

,834

6,84

812

,415

17,5

26P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal

scie

nces

225,

268

161,

034

29.7

5623

,960

10,5

18M

athe

mat

ics

38,1

6026

,150

4.35

43,

923

3.73

3Li

fe s

cien

ces

418,

472

363,

258

26,8

6015

,836

)2,5

18P

sych

olog

y22

,036

11.9

713.

464

4.64

31.

958

Soc

ial s

cien

ces

62,0

4940

£94

6,03

06,

225

9,10

0O

ther

sci

ence

s, n

.e.c

. ....

.53

,265

36,3

925,

705

1,10

410

.064

Tab

le 1

337.

Per

cent

dis

trib

utio

n of

sel

ecte

d fin

anci

al, e

mpl

oym

ent,

and

educ

atio

nal c

hara

cter

istic

s of

sci

entif

ic a

nd e

ngin

eerin

gac

tiviti

es o

f uni

vers

ities

and

col

lege

s, b

y in

stitu

tiona

l gro

up r

anke

d on

the

basi

s of

R&

D e

xpen

ditu

res,

197

0

(Dol

lars

in th

ousa

nds)

Inst

itutio

nal g

roup

rank

ed a

ccor

ding

toam

ount

of R

&D

expe

nditu

res

Cur

rent

R&

Dex

pend

iture

s°T

otal

expe

nditu

res

for

inst

ruct

ion

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t,an

d in

stru

ctio

nS

cien

tists

and

engi

neer

s

Deg

rees

gra

nted

in th

e sc

ienc

esan

d en

gine

erin

gb

Tot

alF

eder

alG

over

nmen

tD

ther

sources

Tot

alF

eder

alG

over

nmen

tD

ther

Sources

Tot

alP

h.D

. or

Sc.

D.

Tot

al, a

ll in

stitu

tion.

..

..

$2,8

56,4

27$1

,658

,298

$1,1

98,1

29$4

,064

,163

$951

,873

$279

,316

$672

,557

273,

775

304.

918

15,8

39

Per

cent

dis

trib

utio

nF

irst 1

021

.924

.218

.711

.38.

87.

29.

510

.88.

821

.0S

econ

d 10

13.9

15.7

11.5

8.1

10.7

11.3

10.4

8.1

6.6

15.4

Thi

rd 1

010

.511

.09.

85.

88.

38.

18.

46.

05.

410

.3F

ourt

h 10

7.8

7.8

7.8

4.3

5.3

7.4

4.5

4.8

4.3

8.3

Fift

h 10

6.4

6.4

6.3

3.9

6.1

9.5

4.7

3.9

3.7

6.7

Six

th 1

05.

55.

55.

55.

15.

45.

05.

63.

73.

57.

9S

even

th 1

04.

73.

95.

93.

13.

63.

83.

63.

23.

54.

9E

ight

h 10

4.0

4.1

3.8

2.7

1.6

2.1

1.4

2.5

2.9

4.5

Nin

th 1

03.

43.

33.

61.

72.

12.

71.

92.

61£

2.6

Ten

th 1

02.

92.

92.

92.

56.

06.

35.

92.

11.

82.

6

Firs

t 100

81.0

84.8

75.8

48.5

58.0

63.2

55.8

47.8

42.0

84.1

All

othe

r in

stitu

tions

19.0

15.2

24.3

5 1.

542

.036

.844

.252

.258

.015

.9

lncl

udes

an

estim

ated

$50

0 m

illio

n in

dep

artm

enta

l res

earc

h.

bExc

lude

s fir

stpr

ofes

sion

al d

octo

rate

s in

med

ical

and

hea

lthre

late

d fie

lds

(M.D

.. D

.D.S

., et

c.)

Page 113: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

AP

PE

ND

IX B

Rep

rodu

ctio

n of

Sur

vey

For

m

NS

F F

OR

M 4

11, N

ovem

ber

1970

NA

TIO

NA

L S

CIE

NC

E F

OU

ND

AT

ION

Was

hing

ton,

D.C

. 205

50

OM

B N

o. 9

9R02

63A

ppro

val e

xpire

sD

ecem

ber

31, 1

971

SU

RV

EY

OF

SC

IEN

TIF

IC A

CT

IVIT

IES

OF

INS

TIT

UT

ION

S O

F H

IGH

ER

ED

UC

AT

ION

, 197

1

Org

aniz

atio

ns a

re r

eque

sted

to c

ompl

ete

and

retu

rn th

is f

orm

to:

Nat

iona

l Sci

ence

Fou

ndat

ion

Was

hing

ton,

D.C

. 205

50A

ttn: U

NIS

G

The

sur

vey

ques

tionn

aire

req

uest

s tw

o ty

pes

of in

form

atio

n on

the

scie

ntif

ic a

nd e

ngin

eeri

ngac

tiviti

es .o

f yo

ur in

stitu

tion:

Part

I, e

mpl

oy-

men

t of

prof

essi

onal

and

tech

nica

l per

sonn

el,

and

Part

II,

cur

rent

and

cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t, an

d in

stru

ctio

n.Pl

ease

rea

d th

e en

clos

ed in

stru

ctio

ns b

efor

eco

mpl

etin

g th

is f

orm

. Whe

re e

xact

dat

a ar

e no

tav

aila

ble,

est

imat

es a

re a

ccep

tabl

e. E

nter

"0

"as

a to

tal r

athe

r th

an le

ave

an it

em b

lank

.T

he d

ata

requ

este

d in

this

que

stio

nnai

re w

illbe

pub

lishe

d as

sta

tistic

al to

tals

or

aggr

egat

es f

oral

lin

stitu

tions

or

for

sele

cted

gro

ups

of in

-st

itutio

ns.

In c

erta

in in

stan

ces,

how

ever

, the

Nat

iona

l Sci

ence

Fou

ndat

ion

may

wis

h to

pub

-lis

h se

lect

ed s

urve

y da

ta w

ith th

e in

stitu

tion

Nam

e an

d ad

dres

s of

inst

itutio

n:(P

leas

e co

rrec

t if

nam

e or

add

ress

has

cha

nged

)

(Includes aggregate data from 2,198

universities and colleges and 105

medical schools, but excludes 35

university-administered FFRDC's)

Fede

rally

Fun

ded

Res

earc

h an

d D

evel

opm

ent

Cen

ters

, as

desi

gnat

ed b

y Fe

dera

l age

ncie

s,Sc

hool

s of

med

icin

e (

note

that

dat

a fo

r m

edic

alsc

hool

s sh

ould

als

o be

incl

uded

on

form

411

)If

you

r in

stitu

tion

has

such

sep

arat

ely

orga

nize

dun

its a

s de

fine

d on

pag

e 2

of th

e In

stru

ctio

ns a

ndha

s no

t rec

eive

d th

e ap

prop

riat

e fo

rms,

thes

efo

rms

will

be

furn

ishe

d up

on r

eque

st.

Thi

s su

rvey

is in

tend

ed to

incl

ude

inst

itutio

nsin

the

Uni

ted

Stat

es a

nd it

s ou

tlyin

g ar

eas.

Exc

lude

fin

anci

al a

nd p

erso

nnel

dat

a re

late

dsp

ecif

ical

ly to

sci

entif

ic a

ctiv

ities

car

ried

out

by

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

ts o

f th

e in

stitu

tion

loca

ted

abro

ad.

Alth

ough

For

m 4

1 1

is in

tend

ed to

be

used

tore

ort

dat

a fo

r th

e in

stitu

tion

as a

who

le, i

t is

Page 114: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Nat

iona

l Sci

ence

Fou

ndat

ion

Washington, D.C. 20550

Attn

: UN

ISG

The

sur

vey

ques

tionn

aire

req

uest

s tw

o ty

pes

of in

form

atio

n on

the

scie

ntif

ic a

nd e

ngin

eeri

ngac

tiviti

es .o

f yo

ur in

stitu

tion:

Part

I, e

mpl

oy-

men

t of

prof

essi

onal

and

tech

nica

l .pe

rson

nel,

and

Part

II, c

urre

nt a

nd c

apita

l exp

endi

ture

sfo

r re

sear

ch, d

evel

opm

ent,

and

inst

ruct

ion.

Plea

se r

ead

the

encl

osed

inst

ruct

ions

bef

ore

com

plet

ing

this

for

m. W

here

exa

ct d

ata

are

not

avai

labl

e, e

stim

ates

are

acc

epta

ble.

Ent

er "

0 "

as a

tota

l rat

her

than

leav

e an

item

bla

nk.

The

dat

a re

ques

ted

in th

is q

uest

ionn

aire

will

be p

ublis

hed

as s

tatis

tical

tota

ls o

r ag

greg

ates

for

all

inst

itutio

ns o

r fo

r se

lect

ed g

roup

s of

in-

stitu

tions

.In

cer

tain

inst

ance

s, h

owev

er, t

heN

atio

nal S

cien

ce F

ound

atio

n m

ay w

ishJ

o pu

b-lis

h se

lect

ed s

urve

y da

ta w

ith th

e in

stitu

tion

iden

tifie

d.Pl

ease

indi

cate

bel

ow th

e nu

mbe

r of

any

item

that

sho

uld

not b

e pu

blis

hed

with

in-

stitu

tiona

l ide

ntif

icat

ion:

In a

dditi

on to

com

plet

ing

this

que

stio

nnai

re f

orth

e in

stitu

tion

as a

who

le, a

lim

ited

num

ber

ofin

stitu

tions

are

req

ueSt

ed to

rep

ort d

ata

for

cer-

tain

of

thei

r or

gani

zatio

nal u

nits

. Sep

arat

e bl

uequ

estio

nnai

res

(NSF

For

m 4

12)

shou

ld b

e us

edto

rep

ort d

ata

for

the

follo

win

g or

gani

zatio

nal

units

:

(Includes aggregate data from 2,198

universities and colleges and 105

medical schools, but excludes 35

university-administered FFRDC's)

Fede

rally

Fun

ded

Res

earc

h an

d D

evel

opm

ent

Cen

ters

, as

desi

gnat

ed b

y Fe

dera

l age

ncie

s,Sc

hool

s of

med

icin

e (

note

that

dat

a fo

r m

edic

alsc

hool

s sh

ould

als

o be

incl

uded

on

form

411

)If

you

r in

stitu

tion

has

such

sep

arat

ely

orga

nize

dun

its a

s de

fine

d on

pag

e 2

of th

e In

stru

ctio

ns a

ndha

s no

t rec

eive

d th

e ap

prop

riat

e fo

rms,

thes

efo

rms

will

be

furn

ishe

d up

on r

eque

st.

Thi

s su

rvey

is in

tend

ed to

incl

ude

inst

itutio

nsin

the

Uni

ted

Stat

es a

nd it

s ou

tlyin

g ar

eas.

Exc

lude

fin

anci

al a

nd p

erso

nnel

dat

a re

late

dsp

ecif

ical

ly to

sci

entif

ic a

ctiv

ities

car

ried

out

by

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

ts o

f th

e in

stitu

tion

loca

ted

abro

ad.

Alth

ough

For

m 4

11 is

inte

nded

to b

e us

ed to

repo

rt d

ata

for

the

inst

itutio

n as

a w

hole

, it i

sre

cogn

ized

that

som

e in

stitu

tions

may

fin

d it

conv

enie

ntto

subm

itse

para

tere

port

sfo

rbr

anch

es o

r ot

her

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

ts.

If y

our

inst

itutio

n pr

efer

s to

sub

mit

sepa

rate

rep

orts

for

bran

ches

or

othe

r or

gani

zatio

nal u

nits

rat

her

than

a si

ngle

rep

ort c

over

ing

the

entir

e in

stitu

tion,

list

belo

w a

ll br

anch

es o

r ot

her

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

tsof

you

r in

stitu

tion

whi

ch h

ave

been

exc

lude

dfr

om th

is r

epor

t and

for

whi

ch s

epar

ate

repo

rts

are

bein

g su

bmitt

ed:

Page 115: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

PA

RT

I-P

ER

SO

NN

EL

DA

TA

(:::t

iorle

s ite

ms

1 to

6 o

f the

sur

vey

ques

tionn

aire

)

Pers

onne

l dat

a ar

e to

be

repo

rted

as

ur 2

anua

ry 1

971

or a

s cl

ose

as p

ossi

ble

ther

eto.

SE

CT

ION

A. N

UM

BE

R O

F S

CIE

NT

IST

S A

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RS

(NO

TE

: Fig

ures

on

grad

uate

stu

dent

s en

gage

d pa

rt ti

me

as s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs s

houl

d be

rep

orte

din

Sec

tion

B).

Item 1.

Ful

l-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

ines

eer

s, b

y fie

ld a

nd fu

nctio

n in

whi

chfu

nctio

n, J

anua

ry 1

971

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed;a

nd to

tal f

ull-t

ime

equi

vale

nts,

by

FIE

LD O

F E

MP

LOY

ME

NT

TO

TA

L°(1

)T

EA

CH

ING

(2)

R &

D(3

)

OT

HE

R

(4)

a. E

ngin

eers

(to

tal)

.

(I)

Aer

onau

tical

eng

inee

rs

(2)C

hcm

ical

eng

inee

rs

(3)

Civ

il en

gine

ers

(4)E

lect

rical

engi

neer

s

(5)

Mec

hani

cal e

ngin

eers

(6)0

11m

engi

neer

s

0110

2,03

917

662

4 48

089

701

111

305

893

379

3301

121

610

125

330

156

0113

3 48

42

971

407

106

0114

5 74

54

311

1 28

814

601

154,

537

3,84

54,

389

592

1,51

310

045

601

166,

358

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)C

hem

ists

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)

Phy

sici

sts

(4)0

thcr

phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts. .

.

0120

32,0

98'

2501

26,

533

553

0121

13,1

6710

,643

2t3

15_ 20

901

225

752

4,43

28

697

1,18

5t1 2,18

784

6

135

161 48

0123

11,0

45.

0124

2,13

41,

240

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)01

3020

,282

18 5

831

316

383

d. L

ite s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts

(2)

Bio

logi

ct!s

cicn

tists

(3)

Med

ical

sci

cntis

ts

0140

85 9

0746

,276

24,4

0915

,222

0141

16,3

343,

460

5,04

47,

182

12,1

83

7,83

077

86,

614

0142

27,8

5741

,716

19,8

9722

,919

0143

e. P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

0150

12,9

9411

,149

943

1029 47

330

0

902

415.

039

019

123

2

f.S

ocia

l sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soc

iolo

gist

s

(3)

Pol

itica

l sci

entis

ts

(4)

His

toria

ns

(5)

Oth

erso

cial

sci

entis

ts

0160

48J3

5_4

2 ,1

3Q__

___2

,.855

0161

9,50

78,

088

8,16

07.

161

13 2

36

0162

8,82

401

637

693

0164

13,6

3923

317

001

659,

072

6,08

582

02,

167

21,1

07g.

Tot

al(s

umof

a to

j)01

0022

3,05

516

1,41

240

,536

h.1:

1Ii d

istr

ibut

ion,

by

func

tionb

..

1 01

9022

3 05

515

5 96

546

158

.20

932

Page 116: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

a. E

ngin

eers

(to

tal)

(1)

Aer

onau

tical

eng

inee

rs

(2)C

hem

ical

eng

inee

rs

(3)

Civ

il en

gine

ers

(4)

Ele

ctric

al e

ngin

eers

(5)M

echa

nica

l eng

inee

rs

(6)0

ther

eng

inee

rs

0110

223,

039

7,66

24,

480

897

0111

1,30

589

337

933

0112

1 61

03

484

1,25

32,

971

4,31

1

301

407

1 28

8

56 106

146

0113

0114

5 74

501

154,

537

6,35

83.

845

4,38

959

21,

513

100

456

0116

b.P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)C

hem

ists

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)P

hysi

cist

s

(4)0

ther

phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts .

..

0120

32,0

9825

,_01

26

533

I55

301

2113

,167

10,6

432,

315

209

0122

5,75

24,

432

1,18

52,

187

846

135

161 48

0123

......

_11

,045

.8,

697

__.

0124

2,13

41,

240

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)01

3020

,282

18,5

831,

316

383

d. L

ife s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

(3)M

edic

al s

cien

tists

0140

85,9

0746

,276

24 4

0915

,222

0141

16,3

3427

,857

41,7

16

3,46

05,

044

19,8

977,

182

22,9

1912

,183

7,83

077

86,

614

0142

0143

e.P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

0150

I

12,9

9411

,149

943

902

1.S

ocia

l sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soc

iolo

gist

s

(3)P

oliti

cal s

cien

tists

(4)

His

tori

ans

(5)

Oth

er s

ocia

l sci

entis

ts

0160

4_8

035

____

_42_

,110

__J

.855

8,08

81

029

8 16

047

3

1,15

D39

019

1

0161

9 50

701

628

824

0163

7,69

374

6130

013

,236

233

6,08

582

0

232

170

2,16

7

0164

13,6

399,

072

0165

g. T

otal

(sum

of

a to

J)

0100

223

055

161

412

40 5

3621

107

h. r

l'E d

istr

ibut

ion.

by

func

tion

.. I

0190

223,

055

155,

965

46,1

5820

,932

Item

2.F

ullti

me

scie

ntis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

, by

field

in w

hich

prim

ar ly

em

ploy

ed a

nd h

ighe

st e

arne

dde

gree

, Jan

uary

197

1

FIE

LD O

F E

MP

LOY

ME

NT

TO

TA

L.(1

)

PH

.D.

OR

SC

.D.

(2)

M.D

.,D

.D.S

.,E

TC

.(3

)

MA

ST

ER

'S(4

)

BA

CH

ELO

R'S

OR

TF

IEE

QU

IVA

LEN

T(5

)a.

Eng

inee

rs

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

c. M

athe

mat

icia

nsd.

Life

sci

entis

tse.

Psy

chol

ogis

ts1.

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

g. T

otal

(sum

of

a to

f)

0210

23zo

3912

,098

22,5

1152 111

7,37

47,

611

3,51

51,

865

0220

32,0

9802

3002

4020

,282

85,9

_77

12,9

0 4

7-11

8, 7

35

9,48

631

, 6oi

519,

672

1421

563_

,65

219

841

1,07

310

,284

2986

602

5002

608

827

120

258

395

26_,

352

2,28

4-

z___

___

19.4

1602

0022

3 05

511

0 87

530

,458

62 3

06°T

otal

s in

item

, la

to 1

g. c

olum

n I ,

s/u

uld

be th

e sa

me

a% th

e co

rres

pond

ing

tota

ls in

item

s 2a

to 2

g, t.

oltti

nn 1

.bT

he to

tal r

epot

ted

in it

em I

h, c

olum

nI,

shou

t( ,

by d

efin

ition

, be

the

sam

e as

the

tota

l in

item

1g,

col

umn

1. H

owev

er, t

he F

IE d

istr

ibu-

tion

by fu

nctio

n (A

lum

s 2,

3, a

nd 4

) w

ill n

ot n

eces

saril

y co

inci

de w

ith th

e fu

nctio

nal

dist

ribut

ion

on a

"pr

imar

ily e

mpl

oyed

" ba

sis

in it

em lg

.

Page 117: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Item 3,

Par

t-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

y tie

ld a

nd fu

nctio

n in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyed

; and

tota

l ful

l-tim

e eq

uiva

lent

s,by

func

tion,

Jan

uary

197

1. (

Exc

lude

gra

duat

e st

uden

ts h

ere

but r

epor

t the

m in

Sec

tion

B)

FIE

LD

OF

EM

PLO

YM

EN

TT

OT

AL

(I)

TE

AC

HIN

G(2

)R

& D

(3)

OT

HE

RA

CT

IVIT

IES

(4)

a. E

ngin

eers

(to

tal)

(1) A

eron

autic

al e

ngin

eers

(2)C

hem

ical

eng

inee

rs

(3)C

ivil

engi

neer

s

(4)

Ele

ctri

cal e

ngin

eers

(5)

Mec

hani

cal e

ngin

eers

(6)

Oth

er e

ngin

eers

0310

4,09

13,

656

359

76-M

r16

412

439

103

12233

200

30

303

1364

5.)

3933

2303

141,

140

1,03

295

1303

1585

078

846

1603

161,

059

923

116

20b.

Phys

ical

sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1) C

hem

ists

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)P

hysi

cist

s

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

0320

3,84

53,

001

781

6303

211,

521

1,23

526

422

0322

748

557

171

2003

231,

150

912

224

1403

2442

629

712

27

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)03

304,

266

4,02

613

011

0d.

Lif

c sc

ient

ists

(to

tal)

(i)A

gric

ultu

ral s

cien

tists

....

- . .

.

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

0340

24,3

6716

,214

6 02

42.

129

0341

1,70

567

453

4';9

703

423

951

2,94

412

,596

911

4,57

996

1,53

603

4318

,711

c. P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

0350

3,81

23,

311

270

231

f.So

cial

sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soci

olog

ists

(3)

Polit

ical

sci

entis

ts

(4)

His

tori

ans

(5)0

tlier

soc

ial s

cien

tists

0360

10,339

8)69

744

41,

198

0361

1 75

62,499

1,60

02,340

100

94

56 65

0362

0363

1,24

51,

177

2543

0364

2,23

22,

115

4374

0365

2 60

71,

465

38,9

051.

828,

008

960

3,80

7g.

Tot

al(s

um (

)fa

to J

)03

0050

,720

h.FI

E d

istr

ibut

ion,

by

func

tionb

..

.03

9019

,658

14,8

593,

593

1,20

6Ite

m4.

Par

t-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

y fie

ld in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyed

and

high

est e

arne

d de

gree

, Jan

uary

197

1.

TnT

Ala

PH

.D.

PM

M.D

.,II

UV

At

croc

BA

CH

EL

OR

'S

Page 118: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

(6)

Oth

cr e

ngin

eers

0316

1,059

923

116

20

b. P

hysi

cal s

cicn

tists

(to

tal)

(1)Chcmists

(2)

Ear

th s

cicn

tists

(3)P

hysi

cist

s

(4)0

thcr

phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts

0320

3,84

53,001

781

63

0321

1,521

1,235

264

22

0322

748

557

171

20

0323

1,150

426

912

297

224

122

14 7

0324

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)03

304,266

4,026

130

110

d.

Lifc

sci

cntis

ts (

tota

l)

(I)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts ..

.....

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

(3)

Mcd

ical

sci

cntis

ts

0340

24 3, 67

16,214

-6,024

2,129

0341

1,705

674

534

497

0342

3051

2,944

12,596

911

4,579

96

1,536

0343

18,711

c.P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

0350

3,812

3,311

270

231

f.S

ocia

l sci

cntis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)Economists

(2)S

ocio

logi

sts

(3)

Pol

itica

l sci

cntis

ts

(4)

His

toria

ns

(5)0

thcr

soc

ial s

cien

tists

0360

10,339

8 697

444

1,198

0361

1 756

1,600

2,340

100

94

56

65

0362

2,499

0363

1,245

2,232

1 177

*2,115

25

43

4,3__

74

0364

0365

2.60

71.465

182

960

g. T

otal

(su

m G

T a

to 1

103

0050,720

38,905

8,008

3,807

h. F

TE

dis

trib

utio

n. b

.!' fu

nctio

n..

0390

19,658

14,859

3,593

I1,206

Item

4.P

art-

time

scie

ntis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

, by

field

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed a

nd h

ighe

st e

arne

d de

gree

, Jan

uary

197

1.

FIE

LD O

F E

MP

LOY

ME

NT

TO

TA

L(1

)

PH

.D.

OR

SC

.D.

(2)

M.D

.,D

.D.S

.,E

TC

.(3

)

MA

ST

ER

'S.(

4)

BA

CH

ELO

R'S

OR

TH

EE

QU

IVA

LEN

T(5

)a.

Eng

incc

rs

b. P

hysi

cal s

cicn

tists

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns

d. L

ifc s

cicn

tists

e. P

sych

olog

ists

1.S

ocia

l sci

cntis

ts

0410

4,091

1 223

20

1,748

1,10

004

203,845

1 748

21 18

1,489

21755

2,747

585

727

1 426

L____,

293

1,286

0430

4,266

766

0440

24,3

674,

421

15,773

04 5

03,812

1L800

2,641

92

145

1,627

,6,267

0460

10,339

g. T

otal

(su

m o

f a to

/).

.04

0050,720

12,599

16 071

16,633

5,417

Tot

als

in it

ems

3a to

3g,

col

umn

1, s

houl

d be

the

sam

e as

the

corr

espo

ndin

g to

tals

in it

ems

4a to

4g,

col

umn

I.bi

le to

tals

in it

em 3

h co

nver

ting

figur

eson

par

t-tim

e em

ploy

men

t int

o F

TE

's w

ill n

eces

saril

y di

ffer

from

hea

dcou

nt to

tals

in it

em 3

g.

Page 119: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

SE

CT

ION

B. N

UM

BE

R O

F G

RA

DU

AT

E S

TU

DE

NT

S E

NG

AG

ED

PA

RT

TIM

E A

S S

CIE

NT

IST

S A

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RS

Item

5.

Gra

duat

e st

uden

ts r

ecei

ving

com

pens

atio

nan

d fu

nctio

n in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

ngag

ed;

for

part

-tim

e se

rvic

es a

s sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs a

t you

r in

stitu

tion,

by fi

eld

and

tota

l FT

E's

, by

func

tion,

Jan

uary

197

1.

FIE

LD

OF

EM

PLO

YM

EN

TT

OT

AL

(I)

TE

AC

HIN

G(2

)R

D (3)

OT

HE

RA

CT

IVIT

IES

(4)

a.E

ngin

eers

(to

tal)

(1)

Aer

onau

tical

eng

inee

rs

(2)C

hem

ical

eng

inee

rs

(3)C

ivil

engi

neer

s

(4)

Ele

ctri

cal e

ngin

cers

(5)

Mec

hani

cal e

ngin

eers

(6)

Oth

er e

ngin

eers

0510

15 ,3

00 8754

32.1

8-09

9_52

4 2 :505

1127

372

79Z

0512

1,79

0513

2,10

471

1,24

814

205

143,

651

2,37

31,

62o

1, 0

281,

982

1,27

84. 67

0515

0516

4,11

-99

1, 5

152,

828

156

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)C

hcm

ists

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)

Phys

icis

ts

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

. .

0520

24,1

4:13

13_,

(..5

_17.

_t_

6,99

12,

'145

1.Q

.117

145

5

3,79

314

1,84

712

8

0521

10,9

31)5

0522

0523

7 ,9

14.1

4,05

83,

761

122

0524

1,44

131

31,

070

58c.

Mat

hem

atic

ians

(to

tal)

0530

8,39

16

586

1,47

233

3d.

Lif

e sc

ient

ists

(to

tal)

(I)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

. . .

. -

.

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

0540

23,1

5711

,180

11,2

13_1

7611

0541

4-,9

511,

244

_51.

30E

2,33

5

216

0542

13,1

995

,007

7,50

12,

435

311

237

0543

e. P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

0550

6,4-

703,

758

2.24

011

-72

1.S

ocia

l sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soci

olog

ists

(3)

Polit

ical

sci

entis

ts

(4)H

isto

rian

s

(5)O

ther

soc

ial s

cien

tists

0560

16 5

1011

,'m4,

0Q8

1.01

0561

i 603

2,85

92,

262

1,98

91,

688

3,12

42,

310

1 21

373

01

513

5_34

1,10

8

128

0562

140

159

2 373

0563

2,36

03,

897

3,79

3.

0564

0565

z. T

otal

(su

m o

f a

to I

)05

0094

,261

52,2

81 I

38/3

933.

587

h. T

E d

istr

ibut

ion,

by

func

tion'

.05

9042

,991

22,8

1818

,598

1,57

5°T

he to

tals

in it

em 5

1i c

onve

rtin

g fi

gure

s on

par

t-tim

e se

rvic

es in

to F

TE

's w

ill n

eces

sari

ly d

iffe

r fr

om h

ead-

coun

t tot

als

in it

em 5

g.

SE

CT

ION

C. N

UM

BE

R O

F T

EC

HN

ICIA

NS

EM

PLO

YE

D IN

TH

E S

CIE

NC

ES

AN

D E

NG

INE

ER

ING

Item 6.

Tec

hnic

ians

, by

field

and

func

tion

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed,

Janu

ary

1971

FIE

LD

OF

EM

PLO

YM

EN

T-

TO

TA

L(1

)R

& D

(2)

OT

HE

RA

CT

IVIT

IES

(3)

Page 120: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

1J.

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(I)C

hcm

ists

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)

Phy

sici

sts

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

. . .

0520

24,4

3313

,50(

10 4

7145

505

2110

,931

6,99

13,

793

147

0522

4 12

02,

145

4,05

818

412

83,

761

122

0523

7,94

105

241,

441

313

1,07

098

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)05

308,

391

6,58

61,

472

333

d. L

ifc s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Api

cultu

ral s

cien

tists

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

0540

23,1

5711

13.8

0u.

,22.

3_1

764

4-11

216

054!

41

1 24

405

421

195,

007

012,

435

_5,3

131-

112,

335

237

0543

e. P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

0550

6,47

03,

758

2.24

047

2f.

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(I)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soc

iolo

gist

s

(3)

Pol

itica

l sci

entis

ts

(4)

His

toria

ns

(5)O

ther

soc

ial s

cien

tists

0560

16,5

1011

,373

4,09

81.

0305

612

262

1:2:

1373

o51

3

128

140

159

0562

2,85

9-

1,98

905

632,

360

1,68

805

643,

897

3,12

453

4-23

905

653,

791

2, 3

101,

108

373

g. T

otal

(ru

m o

fa to

0500

94-2

6152

, 281

38,3

933

587

h. F

TE

dis

trib

utio

n, b

y fu

nctio

ns05

9042

,991

22,8

1818

,598

1,57

5T

he to

tals

in it

em S

h co

nver

ting

figur

es o

n pa

rt-t

ime

serv

ices

into

FT

F:s

will

nec

essa

rily

diffe

r fr

om h

cad-

coun

t tot

als

in it

em S

g.

SE

CT

ION

C. N

UM

BE

R O

F T

EC

HN

ICIA

NS

EM

PLO

YE

D IN

TH

E S

CIE

NC

ES

AN

D E

NG

INE

ER

ING

Item

Tec

hnic

ians

, by

field

and

func

tion

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed, J

anua

ry 1

971

6.

FIE

LD O

F E

MP

LOY

ME

NT

a. E

ngin

eerin

g te

chni

cian

s

b. P

hysi

cal*

scic

nce

tech

nici

ans

0610

TO

TA

L(I

) 5,67

2

c. B

iolo

gica

l sci

ence

tech

nici

ans

(incl

ude

agric

ultu

ral)

d. M

edic

al a

nd h

ealth

rela

tcd

tech

nici

ans

e. S

ocia

l sci

ence

tech

nici

ans

1.T

otal

(su

m o

f a to

el

06C

11

5,22

0

13,0

57

20,5

05

1,55

9

D(2

) 3,58

5

3, 3

21

10,0

96

OT

HE

RA

CT

IVIT

IES

(3) 2,

087

1, 8

99

2,96

1

6 50

4 3

46.0

1331

,909

14,1

04

Page 121: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

3

PA

RT

IIF

INA

NC

IAL

DA

TA

(Inc

lude

s ite

ms

7 to

13

of th

e.su

rvey

que

stio

nnai

re)

FIN

AN

CIA

L D

AT

A R

EPO

RT

ED

IN

PA

RT

II

AR

E F

OR

TH

E F

ISC

AL

YE

AR

, WH

ICH

BE

GA

N O

N J

UL

Y 1

,1969

AN

DE

ND

ED

ON

JU

NE

30,

197

0, O

R Y

OU

R I

NST

ITU

TIO

N'S

EQ

UIV

AL

EN

T F

ISC

AL

YE

AR

. SPE

CIF

Y T

HE

EN

DIN

GD

AT

E I

F D

IFFE

RE

NT

FR

OM

AB

OV

E:

AL

L F

INA

NC

IAL

DA

TA

RE

QU

EST

ED

ON

TH

IS F

OP.

MSH

OU

LD

BE

RE

POR

TE

D I

N T

HO

USA

ND

SO

F D

OL

LA

RS;

FOR

EX

AM

PLE

, AN

EX

PEN

DIT

UR

E O

F$2

5,34

2 SH

OU

LD

BE

RO

UN

DE

D T

O T

HE

NE

AR

EST

TH

OU

SAN

DD

OL

LA

RS

v,A

ND

RE

POR

TE

D I

N T

HE

APP

RO

PRIA

TE

CO

LU

MN

S A

S$2

5.

*The numbers within parentheses in items

7 through 10 include an

estimate for departmental research and other

R&D costs for which

most universities and colleges do not maintain

separate records.

The numbers outside the parentheses

represent separately-budgeted

R&D expenditures as reported by

institutions included in the

survey.

All charts and appendix tables include

estimates for nonseparately

budgeted R&D expenditures.

Page 122: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

NIM

II=

.1.0

1.

AL

L F

INA

NC

IAL

DA

TA

RE

QU

EST

ED

ON

TH

IS F

OR

MSH

OU

LD

BE

RE

POR

TE

D I

N T

HO

USA

ND

SO

F D

OL

LA

RS;

FOR

EX

AU

PLE

, AN

EX

PEN

DIT

UR

EO

F $2

5,34

2 SH

OU

LD

BE

RO

UN

DE

D T

O T

HE

NE

AR

EST

TH

OU

SAN

D D

OL

LA

RS

AN

D R

EPO

RT

ED

IN

TH

E A

PPR

OPR

IAT

EC

OL

UM

NS

AS

$25.

*The numbers within parentheses in

items 7 through 10 include

an

estimate for departmental research and

other R&D costs for which

most universities and colleges do

not maintain separate records.

The numbers outside the parentheses

represent separately-budgeted

R&D expenditures as reported by

institutions included in the

survey.

All charts and appendix tables include

estimates for nanseparately

budgeted R&D expenditures.

*In item 11 the numbers withinparentheses represent both direct and

indirect costs for instruction.

These numbers exclude estimates

for departmental research but

include indirect costs in item 12

associated with instruction.

The numbers outside the parentheses

represent total direct expenditures for

instruction and departmental

research as reported bysurvey respondents.

All charts and appendix

tables represent total instruction

expenditures.

Page 123: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

SE

CT

ION

D

CURRENT EXPENDITURES FOR SEPARATELY BUDGETED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D)

If yo

ur in

stitu

tion

did

not h

ave

any

curr

ent e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

rese

arch

and

dev

elop

men

t in

1969

-70

chec

k"n

one"

in th

e sp

ace

prov

ided

her

e an

d sk

ip to

Sec

tion

E.

Non

e.

(Exc

lude

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r ca

pita

l equ

ipm

ent a

nd fa

cilit

ies.

)

Item

7.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r se

para

tely

bud

gete

d re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent,

by s

ourc

e of

fund

s, 1

969-

70

SO

UR

CE

OF

FU

ND

ST

HO

US

AN

DS

OF

DO

LLA

RS

INT

ER

NA

L U

SE

ON

LY

a.F

eder

al G

over

nmen

t

b. S

tate

gov

ernm

ent

c. L

ocal

gov

ernm

ent

d. F

ound

atio

ns

e. V

olun

tary

hea

lth a

genc

ies

1.In

dust

ry

g.In

stitu

tion'

s ow

n fu

nds

h. O

ther

sou

rces

0710

0720

0730

0740

0750

0760

0770

0780

$1,6

58,2

9826

1,01

011

,931

75,8

0936

,067

61,6

3319

7,09

2(6

96,7

47)*

54,9

32

equa

ls 8

d an

d 9d

(C

ol. 2

)

i.T

otal

(su

m O

a to

h)5

0700

:2,3

56,7

72(2

,856

,427

)*eq

uals

8d

and

9d (

Col

. 1)

Item

8.T

otal

and

fede

rally

fina

nced

cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r se

para

tely

bud

gete

d re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent,

by m

ajor

cost

item

, 196

9-70

.

CO

ST

ITE

M

TH

OU

SA

ND

S O

F D

OLL

AR

S

TO

TA

L(1

)F

ED

ER

AL

GO

VE

RN

ME

NT

(2)

a.D

irect

wag

es a

nd s

alar

ies

b. A

ll ot

her

dire

ct c

ost!

(incl

udin

gm

ater

ials

and

sup

plie

s)

c.In

dire

ct c

osts

rei

mbu

rsed

or

reim

-bu

rsab

leiiI

MIN

EIM

IIMN

IMM

IIMill

ettr

VIM

IVIV

IRIM

1112

111W

M4.

10m

.

d. T

otal

(su

m O

a to

c)a

$ 1

2322

138

0810

728,

477

--32

22.8

1708

002,

356

772

0820

0830

1111

1141

11.4

.4.1

.

(115

9710

13)*

(7'

78,5

11)

i

(41

30,9

03)3

'

(2,8

56,4

27)3

'$

870,

445

512

632

275,

221

1,65

8,29

8

Item

9.T

otal

and

fede

rally

fina

nced

cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r se

para

tely

bud

gete

d re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent,

by ty

peof

R&

D

activ

ity, 1

969.

70.

TY

PE

OF

R&

D A

CT

IVIT

Y

TH

OU

SA

ND

S O

F D

OLL

AR

S

TOTAL

fF

liDiM

Al.

GO

VE

RN

ME

NT

Page 124: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

d. F

ound

atio

ns

c. V

olun

tary

hea

lth a

genc

ies

f.In

dust

ry

g.In

stitu

tion'

s ow

n fu

nds

h. O

ther

sou

rces

0740

75,8

0907

5036

,067

0760

61,6

3307

7019

7,09

2(6

96 7

47)*

0780

54,9

32i.

Tot

al (

sum

of a

to N

s07

00,

S2,

356,

772

(2,8

56,4

27)*

equa

ls 8

d an

d 9d

(C

ol. 1

)

Item

8. .....,

Item

9.

Tot

al a

nd fe

dera

lly fi

nanc

ed c

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

rese

arch

and

dev

elop

men

t, by

maj

or c

ost

item

, 196

9.70

.

CO

ST

ITE

M

TH

OU

SA

ND

S O

F D

OLL

AR

S

TO

TA

L(I

)F

ED

ER

AL

GO

VE

RN

ME

NT

(2)

a.D

irect

wag

es a

nd s

alar

ies

b, A

ll ot

her

dire

ct c

osts

(in

clud

ing

mat

eria

ls a

nd s

uppl

ies)

c.In

dire

ct c

osts

rei

mbu

rsed

or

reim

bUrs

able

0810

si 2

97 .4

38(1

0972

012h

.

728,

477

(77

13,5

11)

$87

0,44

5

0820

512,

632

0830

330,

857

(48

0,90

3)'

275,

221

......

...d.

Tot

al (

sum

of a

to c

)10

1140

a14.

.wili

0800

...S

.ALs

.., J

. alli

v.ii.

.61.

01.1

4..M

ILM

INIM

P.A

IMM

IGIII

.M.A

NP

AY

INA

MIS

MN

OM

R12

.6

$$

2,35

6,77

2(2

,856

,427

)'1,

658,

298

Tot

al a

nd fe

dera

lly fi

nanc

ed c

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

rese

arch

and

dev

elop

men

t, by

type

of R

&D

activ

ity, 1

969.

70.

TY

PE

OF

R&

D A

CT

IVIT

Y

TH

OU

SA

ND

S O

F D

OLL

AR

S

TO

TA

L(1

)F

ED

ER

AL

GO

VE

RN

ME

NT

(2)

a.B

asic

res

earc

h

b. A

pplie

d re

sear

ch

c. D

evel

opm

ent

1)91

0$

1 78

7 80

6(2

,185

2621

)t,

$ 1

288,

630

266,

083

0920

0930

144,

194

-.--

-10

3L5_

85

d. T

otal

(su

m o

f a to

c)a

0900

..-.=

azsr

$2,

356,

772

(2'

...,85

6 42

7)'=

1==

.....-

7

5 1,

658,

298

'Tot

als

in it

ems

7i, 8

d (C

ol. 1

) an

d 9d

(C

ol. 1

) sh

ould

be

iden

tical

. Sim

ilarly

, fig

ures

rep

orte

d in

item

s 7a

, 8d

(Col

. 2)

and

9d(C

ol. 2

) sh

ould

be

iden

tical

. If f

igur

es fo

r th

e fo

rego

ing

item

s ar

e no

t con

sist

ent,

plea

se g

ive

reas

ons

in "

Rem

arks

" at

the

end

of th

e qu

estio

nnai

re.

Page 125: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

;.

LA 0

Item

10.

Tot

al a

nd fe

dera

lly fi

nanc

ed c

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

ly b

udgi

ted

basi

c an

d ap

plie

d re

sear

ch,

by fi

eld

of s

cien

ce, 1

969-

70

I

FIE

LD

OF

SCIE

NC

E

TH

OU

SAN

DS

OF

DO

LL

AR

S

TO

TA

L(1

)FE

DE

RA

L G

OV

ER

NM

EN

T(2

)

a. E

ngin

eeri

ng (

tota

l)10

10$

279,

724

(346

,427

)* $

212,

538

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

ces

(tot

al)

1020

315,

181

(368

1789

1* $

264,

649

(1)

Ast

rono

my

(2)

Che

mis

try

(3)

Phys

ics

(4)

Phys

ical

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1021

17,0

27(

19,6

81)*

14,6

1210

2210

1,03

7(1

19,5

78)*

78,6

4910

2316

4,69

9(1

91,3

36)*

147,

871

1024

32,4

18(

38,1

94)*

23,5

17c.

Env

iron

men

tal s

cien

ces

(tot

al)

1030

$11

1,87

6(1

30,2

77)*

$79

,648

d. M

athe

mat

ics

(tot

al)

1040

$65

,112

(102,444)4

$47

,667

e. L

ife

scie

nces

(to

tal)

1050

(1)

Bio

logi

cal

(2)

Clin

ical

med

ical

(3)

Lif

e sc

ienc

es, N

EC

1051

(1,3

1113

66)4

$1,1

29,4

9147

9,07

6$

767,

053

(559

,306

)*29

9,04

510

5253

0,13

2(6

12,8

07)*

413,

788

1053

120,

283

(139,253)4

54,2

20f.

Psyc

holo

gy (

tota

l)10

60(1

) B

iolo

gica

l asp

ects

(2)

Soci

al a

spec

ts

(3)

Psyc

holo

gica

l sci

ence

s, N

EC

1061

1062

56,4

1314

,098

25,4

62

( 79

,532

)*(

19,8

22)*

( 36

,105

)*

$45

,005

10,9

9020

,979

1063

16,8

53(

23,6

05)*

13,0

36g.

Soc

ial s

cien

ces

(tot

al)

1070

(1)

Eco

nom

ics

(2)

Polit

ical

sci

ence

(8)

Soci

olog

y

(4)

Soci

al s

cien

ces,

NE

C

1071

$16

6,71

13.

3,00

9(2

72,9

82)*

( 60

,613

)*$

93,1

1217

,146

1072

16,1

60(

26,8

68)

*7,

282

1073

42,7

80(

69,0

07)*

.25

,346

1074

69,7

62(1

16,4

94)'

43,3

38h.

Oth

er s

cien

ces,

NE

C (

tota

l)i.

Tot

al (

sum

of

a to

h)

1080

1000

88,0

70$2

,212

,578

(100

,416

)* $

45,0

41(2

,712

,233

)* $

1,55

4,71

3If

you

r in

stitu

tion

has

deve

lopm

ent f

unds

ple

ase

do n

ot d

istr

ibut

e th

emsh

ould

be

iden

tical

with

the

sum

of

lines

9a

and

9b(c

olum

ns 1

and

2).

by f

ield

of

scie

nce.

Tot

als

in 1

0i (

colu

mns

1. a

rid

2)1

SE

CT

ION

EC

UR

RE

NT

EX

PE

ND

ITU

RE

S F

OR

INS

TR

UC

TIO

N A

ND

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

AL

RE

SE

AR

CH

IN T

HE

SC

IEN

CE

SA

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

GIte

m11

.C

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

inst

ruct

ion

and

depa

rtm

enta

l res

earc

h in

the

scie

nces

and

engi

neer

ing,

by

field

of s

cien

ce, 1

969-

70

FIE

LD

OF

SCIE

NC

ET

OT

AL

IN

STR

UC

TIO

N A

ND

DEPARTMENTAL RESEARCH

(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

INT

ER

NA

LU

SE O

NL

Y

4

Page 126: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

(4)

Phys

ical

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1024

32 4

18(

38,1

94) 4

23,5

17-T

rr79

,648

C. E

nvir

onm

enta

l sci

ence

s (t

otal

)10

20$

111

876

130,

277

d. M

athe

mat

ics

(tot

al)

1040

$65

,112

102,

444

4 $

47,0

7e.

Lif

e sc

ienc

es (

tota

l)10

50$1

,129

,491

(10

11,3

66)4

$76

7,05

3(1

) B

iolo

gica

l

(2)

Clin

ical

med

ical

(3)

Lif

e sc

ienc

es, N

EC

1051

479,

076

(559

,306

)*29

9,04

510

5253

0,13

2(6

12,8

07)*

413,

788

1053

120,

283

(139

,253

)*54

,220

f.Ps

ycho

logy

(to

tal)

1060

1061

56,4

13(

79,5

32)*

$45

,005

(1)

Bio

logi

cal a

spec

ts(2

) So

cial

asp

ects

(3)

Psyc

holo

gica

l sci

ence

s, N

EC

14,0

98(

19,8

22)1

-10

,990

1062

25,4

62(

36 1

05)*

20,9

7910

6316

853

( 23

,605

)13

,036

g. S

ocia

l sci

ence

s (t

otal

)10

7016

6,71

127

2,98

2*

$93

,112

(1)

Eco

nom

ics

(2)

Polit

ical

sci

ence

(3)

Soci

olog

y

(4)

Soci

al s

cien

ces,

NE

C

1071

33,0

09(

60 6

13)*

17,1

4610

7216

,160

( 26

868

) *7

282

1073

42,7

80(

69 0

07)

25,3

4610

746%

762

(116

,494

) *43

,338

h. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

(to

tal)

1080

$88

,070

(100

4.1

6)*

$45

041

i.T

otal

(su

m o

f a

to h

)10

00$

2 21

2,57

8 (2

,712

,233

)* $

1,55

4,71

3If

you

r in

stitu

tion

has

deve

lopm

ent f

unds

ple

ase

do n

ot d

istr

ibut

eth

em b

y fi

eld

of s

cien

ce. T

otal

s in

10i

(co

lum

ns 1

and

2)sh

ould

be

iden

tical

with

the

sum

of

lines

9a

and

9b (

colu

mns

1 a

nd2)

.

SE

CT

ION

EC

UR

RE

NT

EX

PE

ND

ITU

RE

S F

OR

INS

TR

UC

TIO

N A

ND

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

AL

RE

SE

AR

CH

IN T

HE

SC

IEN

CE

S A

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

G

Item

11.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r in

stru

ctio

n an

d de

part

men

tal r

esea

rch

in th

e sc

ienc

es a

nd e

ngin

eerin

g, b

yfie

ld o

f sci

ence

, 196

9-70

FIE

LD

OF

SCIE

NC

ET

OT

AL

IN

STR

UC

TIO

N A

ND

DE

PAR

TM

EN

TA

L R

ESE

AR

CH

(TH

OU

SAN

DS

OF

DO

LL

AR

S)IN

TE

RN

AL

USE

ON

LY

a. E

ngin

eeri

ngb.

Phy

sica

l and

env

iron

men

tal s

cien

ces_

_

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

yf.

Soci

al s

cien

ces

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s,N

EC

1110

416,

680

g,22

1,g.

r*:

1120

506,

01.1

1130

293,

668

366,

649

*11

401,

0 0,

242

(1 2

86,6

74 *

1150

183,

921.

228,

120

1160

765,

357

939;

110

*11

7090

.976

108,

740

*h.

Tot

al (

sum

of

a to

g)

1100

$3,

346,

855

(4,0

64,1

63)*

Item

12.

Est

imat

e th

e do

llar

amou

nt o

f ove

rhea

dor

indi

rect

cos

ts a

lloca

ble

to th

e in

-st

ruct

ion

and

depa

rtm

enta

l res

earc

h ac

tiviti

es r

epor

ted

abov

e(it

em 1

1)12

00T

HO

US

AN

DS

OF

DO

LLA

RS

Is1,

216,

963

Page 127: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

SE

CT

ION

F

CA

PIT

AL

EX

PE

ND

ITU

RE

SP

jl:1R

SC

IEN

TIF

ICA

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

G F

AC

ILIT

IES

AN

DE

QU

IPM

EN

T F

OR

RE

SE

AR

CH

, DE

VE

LOP

ME

NT

, AN

DIN

ST

RU

CT

ION

Item

13.

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

scie

ntifi

c an

d en

gine

erin

gfa

cilit

ies

and

equi

pmen

t for

res

earc

h, d

evel

opm

ent,

and

inst

ruct

ion,

by fi

eld

of s

cien

ce, s

ourc

e of

fund

s, a

nd p

urpo

se,

1969

.70.

Pror

ate

any

expe

nditu

res

inte

nded

for

use

in tw

o or

mor

e fi

elds

of s

cien

ce a

nd f

or R

&D

and

gra

duat

e an

d un

derg

radu

ate

inst

ruct

ion.

Do

not i

nclu

dean

y m

ater

ials

and

sup

plie

s re

port

edun

der

curr

ent e

xpen

ditu

res

in S

ectio

n D

or

Sect

ion

E. I

nclu

de c

urre

nt f

und

expe

ndi-

ture

s fo

r eq

uipm

ent a

nd f

acili

ties

as w

ell a

s pl

ant a

ndot

her

fund

s.

FIE

LD

OF

SCIE

NC

E

SOU

RC

E O

F FU

ND

S (T

HO

USA

ND

S O

F D

OL

LA

RS)

TO

TA

L(1

)

FED

ER

AL

GO

VE

RN

-M

EN

T(2

)

STA

TE

AN

D L

OC

AL

GO

VE

RN

ME

NT

(3)

OT

HE

RSO

UR

CE

S(4

)

13.1

All

purp

oses

(to

tal)

a.E

ngin

eeri

ng

b. P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

l sci

ence

s

c.M

athe

mat

ics

d.L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

y

f.So

cial

sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s,N

EC

1310

S13

2,62

3S

38,2

6354

,417

39,9

113

1320

225,

268

63,1

0710

1,01

361

,148

1330

38,1

609,

536

17,0

1511

,609

1340

1118

,14.

7214

2,71

817

3,56

910

2,18

513

5022

,036

4 84

811

,295

36 7

385,

893

15,0

0816

704

1360

62,0

4910

,303

1370

53,2

6510

,541

26,0

2042

0,06

7h.

Tot

al(s

um o

f a to

gl

1300

s95

1,:7

3S

279,

316

252.

490

13.2

Res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t and

/or

grad

uate

inst

ruct

ion

a. E

ngin

eeri

ng

b. P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

l sci

ence

s

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

y

f.So

cial

sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1311

S53

,348

S18

,162

15,6

3419

552

1321

103,

703

32,0

1043

,597

28,0

9613

3111

1 ,4

8144

285,

668

4 68

513

4129

1,64

811

5,18

610

8,62

767

,835

1351

7,12

02,

061

3 50

41,

555

1361

18,6

013

449

9,72

25,

430

1371

16,9

844

722

5 48

36

779

h. T

otal

(sum

of a

to g

j13

01S

505,

885

S17

9,71

819

2,23

513

3,93

2

13.3

Und

ergr

adua

te in

stru

ctio

n

a. E

ngin

eeri

ng

b. P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

l sci

ence

s

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d.L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

y

f.So

cial

sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1312

S79

,275

S20

,101

38 7

8320

,391

1322

121,

565

31,0

9757

,416

33,0

5213

3223

,679

5 40

811

,347

6,92

413

4212

6,82

427

,532

64 9

4234

,350

1352

14 9

162,

787

6 8

47,

791

27,0

3_6

20,5

37

48

9,5

89,

925

1362

43 4

4813

7236

,281

5 81

9

Page 128: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

0\

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

b. P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

l sci

ence

s

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

y

f.So

cial

sci

ence

s'

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1372

1320

36 ,2

81

225,

268

5 ,8

19

63,1

07

20,5

37

101,

013

9,925

61,1

4613

3038,160

9,536

17,0

1511

,609

1340

418,

472

142,

718

173,

569

102

L.__18

5

5,89

315

,008

1350

22,036

4 848

11,295

36,7

3813

6062

,049

10,3

0313

70

1750

53,2

6510

,541

i279

,316

26 020

-42

0,06

716,7011

252.

490

h. T

otal

(su

m o

f a

to g

)r7

71;8

7313

.2R

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent a

nd/o

r gr

adua

tein

stru

ctio

n

a. E

ngin

eeri

ngb.

Phy

sica

l and

env

iron

men

tal s

cien

ces

.c.

Mat

hem

atic

s

d. L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

y

1.So

cial

sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1311

$53

,348

S18,162

15, 634

19,5

5228,096

1321

103,

703

32,0

1043,597

1331

14,481

4,128

5,668

4,685

1341

291,648

115,186

108,627

67,8

3513

517,

120

2,06

13,

504

1,555

1361

18,601

3, 449

9 72

25,

1130

1371

16 ,9

844

,722

5,483

6779

h. T

otal

(su

m o

f a

tog/

1301

S50

5,88

517

9,71

819

2,23

513

3,93

213

.3U

nder

grad

uate

inst

ruct

ion

a. E

ngin

eeri

ngb.

Phy

sica

l and

env

iron

men

tal s

cien

ces

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

y

E S

ocia

l sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1312

S79,275

S20

,101

38,7

8357,416

20,3

9133,052

1322

121,

565

31,0

9713

3223

, 679

5, 408

11, 3

476,

924

1342

126,824

27,5

3264,942

34

350

1352

14,916

2,787

6,854

7,791

27,0

1620

,537

4,338

9,578

9,92

513

6243,448

1372

36,2

815

,819

._4.

.....=

---.

,h.

Tot

al (

sum

of

a to

g)

113

02$

445,988

S99,598

227,

832

118,

558

RE

MA

RK

S: I

fadd

ition

al s

pace

is n

eede

d, a

ttach

an

extr

a pa

ge.

NA

ME

OF

PER

SON

SU

BM

ITT

ING

TH

IS F

OR

MT

ITL

E

NA

ME

OF

INS

mu

IIO

NA

DD

RE

SS(n

umbe

r, s

tree

t, ci

ty, s

tate

, ZIP

cod

e)

AR

EA

CO

DE

, 1E

LE

PIIO

NE

NO

., E

XT

.D

A11

4.

Page 129: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Appendix CStatistical Tables

Medical Schools

C1. Selected employment characteristics of scientists inmedical schools, 19§5.7I

C-1. Number of scientists employed in medical schools,by geographic division, 1965. 1967, 1969, and 1971

C-3. Selected characteristics of graduate students re-

ceiving compensation for part-time services as scientists in medical schools, by field and function, Janu-ary 1965, 1967, 1969, and 1971

C-4. Number of technicians employed in medical schools,by field and function, January 1965, 1967, 1969,and 1971

5. Current R&D expenditures in medical schools,1964, 1966, 1968, and 1970

List of Medical Schools Included in Survey

ALABAMA: University of Alabama Medical Center.

ARIZONA: University of Arizona College of Medicine.

ARKANSAS: University of Arkansas Medical Center.

CALIFORNIA:Loma Linda University School of Medicine.Stanford University School of Medicine.University of California School of Medicine (Davis).University of California College of Medicine (Irvine).University of California School of Medicine (San Diego).University of California School of Medicine (Los Angeles).University of California School of Medicine (San Francisco).University of Southern California School of Medicine.

COLORADO: University of Colorado Medical Center.

CONNECTICUT:University of Connecticut Health Center.Yale University School of Medicine.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA:Georgetown University School of Medicine.George Washington University School of Medicine.Howard University College of Medicine.

62 FLORIDA:University of Florida College of Medicine.

62 University of Miami School of Medicine.University of South Florida College of Medicine.

GEORGIA:Emory University School of Medicine.Medical College of Georgia.

HAWAII: University of Hawaii School of Medicine.

63 ILLINOIS:Chicago Medical School.

64 Loyola University, Stritch School of Medicine.Northwestern University Medical School.University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine.University of Illinois Medical Center.

INDIANA: Indiana University School of Medicine.

IOWA: University of Iowa College of Medicine.

KANSAS: University of Kansas Medical Center.

KENTUCKY:University of Kentucky College of Medicine.University of Louisville School of Medicine.

LOUISIANA:Louisiana State University Medical Center (New Orleans).Tulanc University School of Medicine.

MARYLAND:Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.Univerity of Maryland School of Medicine.

63

61

MASSACHUSETBoston UniveHarvard MediaTufts Universi

MICHIGAN:Michigan Star%

University ofWayne State 1

MINNESOTA:

MISSISSIPPI: Ur

MISSOURI:St. Louis UnitUniversity of 'University ofWashington

NEBRASKA:Creighton UmUniversity of

NEW HAMPSHIR

NEW JERSEY:New Jersey C.Rutgers the

NEW MEXICO:

NEW YORK:CUNY Mt. SColumbia UniCornell UniverNew York McNew York UnSUNNi - DowrSUNY StonSUNY - UpstaAlbany MedicSUNY BuffaUniversity ofYeshiva Univc

NORTH CAROL!Duke Univers!University ofWake Forest (

NORTH DA KOTMedicine.

OHIO:Case-Western IMedical CollegOhio State UnUniversity of

Page 130: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

SE

nive .

edi

versi

Stat

ofate

:U

Unis

of,'ofnU

Uni

'of

Y:

'y C..the!

0:

ft. S

Uni

five

Me

Un

owl

tom'

Ipsoodic

uffa

of

4iive

OL1versi

ofest

KO

ern

olle

Un

'of I

itists in. . . . 62

schools,

Id 1971 62

nts reis scien-

1. Janu-

. . . . 63

chools,1969,

. . . . 63

schools,

64

List of Medical Schools Included in Survey

ALABAMA: University of Alabama Medical Center.

ARIZONA: University of Arizona College of Medicine.

ARKANSAS: University of Arkansas Medical Center.CALIFORNIA:

Loma Linda University School of Medicine.Stanford University School of Medicine.University of California School of Medicine (Davis).University of California College of Medicine (Irvine).University of California School of Medicine (San Diego).University of California School of Medicine (Los Angeles).University of California School of Medicine (San Francisco).University of Southern California School of Medicine.

COLORADO: University of Colorado Medical Center.CONNECTICUT:

University of Connecticut Health Center.Yale University School of Medicine.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA:Georgetown University School of Medicine.George Washington University School of Medicine.Howard University College of Medicine.

FLORIDA:University of Florida College of Medicine.University of Miami School of Medicine.University of South Florida College of Medicine.

GEORGIA:Emory University School of Medicine.Medical College of Georgia.

HAWAII: University of Hawaii School of Medicine.

ILLINOIS:Chicago Medical School.Loyola University, Stritch School of Medicine.Northwestern University Medical School.University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine.University of Illinois Medical Center.

INDIANA: Indiana University School of Medicine.'

IOWA: University of Iowa College of Medicine.

KANSAS: University of Kansas Medical Center.

KENTUCKY:University of Kentucky College of Medicine.University of Louisville School of Medicine.

LOUISIANA:Louisiana State University Medical Center (New Orleans).Tulane University School of Medicine.

MARYLAND:Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.University of Maryland School of Medicine.

61

MASSACHUSETTS:Boston University School of Medicine.Harvard Medical School.Tufts University School of Medicine.

MICHIGAN:Michigan State University College of Human Medicine.University of Michigan Medical School.1Vayne State University School of Medicine.

MINNESOTA: University of Minnesota Medical School.

MISSISSIPPI: University of Mississippi School of Medicine.

MISSOURI:St. Louis University School of Medicine.University of Missouri Medical Center (Columbia).University of Missouri School of Medicine (Kansas City).Washington University School of Medicine.

NEBRASKA:Creighton University School of Medicine.University of Nebraska Medical Center.

NEW HAMPSHIRE: Dartmouth Medical School.NEW JERSEY:

New Jersey College of Medicine and Dentistry.Rutgers - the State University Medical School.

NE1V MEXICO: University of New Mexico School of Medicine.NEW YORK:

CUNY - Mt. Sinai School of Medicine.Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons.Cornell University Medical College.New York Medical College.New York University Medical Center.SUNY - Downstate Medical Center.SUNY - Stony Brook School of Medicine.SUNY - Upstate Medical Center.Albany Medical College of Union University.SUNY - Buffalo School of Medicine.University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry.Yeshiva University. Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

NORTH CAROLINA:Duke University School of Medicine.University of North Carolina School of Medicine.Wake Forest College, Bowman Gray School of Medicine.

NORTH DAKOTA: University of North Dakota School ofMedicine.

OHIO:Case-Western Reserve University School of Medicine.Medical College of Ohio.Ohio State University College of Medicine.University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.

1

1

Page 131: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

OKLAHOMA: University of Oklahoma Medical Center.

OREGON: University of Oregon Medical School.

PENNSYLVANIA:Hahneman Medical College of Philadelphia.Thomas Jefferson University and Hospital.Pennsylvania State University. Milton S. Hershey Medical

Center.Temple University School of Medicine.University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.The Medical College of Pennsylvania.

RHODE ISLAND: Brown University, Program in MedicalScience.

SOUTH CAROLINA: Medical University of South Carolina.

SOUTH DAKOTA: University of South Dakota School ofMedicine.

TENNESSEE:Meharry Medical College.University of Tennessee College of Medicine.Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.

TEXAS:Baylor College of Medicine.University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor

Institute.University of Texas Medical School (San Antonio).University of Texas, Southwestern Medical School (Dallas).University of Texas Medical Branch (Galveston).University of Texas Medical School (Houston)

UTAH: University of Utah College of Medicine.

VERMONT: University of Vermont College of Medicine.

VIRGINIA:Virginia Commonwealth University Medical CollegeUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine.

WASHINGTON: University of Washington School of Medicine.

WEST VIRGINIA: West Virginia University School of Medicine.

WISCONSIN:Medical College of Wisconsin.University of Wisconsin Medical School.

PUERTO RICO: University of Puerto Rico, Medical SciencesCampus

I

Table C1. Selected employment characteristics of scien

ItemJanuary 1965 January 11

Number Percentdistribution

Number Pe

distr

Number of scientists 38,394 100.0 43,808 1(

Employment status:Full time 25,552 66.6 30,332 (

Part time 12,842 33.4 13,476 :

Field of employment:Biological scientists 7,154 18.6 7,563Medical scientists 30,722 80.0 35,531 1

All other scientists 518 1.4 714

Educational attainment:Ph. D. (a) (a) 7,647M.D., D.D.S., etc. (a) (a) 31,035Master's (a) (a) 2,169Bachelor's (a) (a) 2,957

FTE scientists 29,970 100.0 34,964 11

Function:Teaching 11,780 39.3 14,843Research and development . . 12,983 43.3 13,821Other activities 5,207 17.4 6,300

'Not available.

Table C2. Number of scientists employed in medical schools, by gel

. January 1965a January 1'

Geographic division Number Percent Number Pe

distribution disti

United States, total 38,394 100.0 43,808 1

New England 3,264 8.5 3,578Middle Atlantic 11,620 30.3 13,227East North Central 6,435 16.8 7,076West North Central 1,646 4.3 3,071South Atlantic 6,346 16.5 6,738 'East South Central 1,592 4.1 1,873West South Central 2,369 6.2 2,698Mountain 832 2.2 1,167Pacific 3,667 9.6 3,743Outlying areas 623 1.6 637

'Revised to exclude healthprotessionals working primarily on patencare.

Page 132: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

r. Table C1. Selected employment characteristics of scientists in medical schools, 1965.71

.y Medical

in Medical

rolina.

School of

and Tumor

of (Dallas).

inc.

f Medicine.

I Medicine.

al Sciences

ItemJanuary 1965 January 1967 January 1969 January 1971

Number Percentdistribution

Number Percentdistribution

Number Percent

distributionNumber Percent

distributionNumber of scientists 38,394 100.0 43.808 100.0 49,792 100.0 56,034 100.0

Employment status:Full time 25,552 66.6 30,332 69.2 34,826 69.9 39,831 71.1Part time 12,842 33.4 13,476 30.8 14,966 30.1 16,203 28.9

Field of employment:Biological scientists 7,154 18.6 7,563 17.3 7,692 15.4 8,561 15.3Medical scientists 30,722 80.0 35,531 81.1 41,064 82.5 46,464 82.9All other scientists 518 1.4 714 1.6 1,036 2.1 1,009 1.8

Educational attainment:Ph. D. (a) (a) 7,647 17.4 9,751 19.6 11,191 20.0M.D., D.D.S., etc. (a) (a) 31,035 70.8 34,896 70.1 38,403 68.5Master's (a) (a) 2,169 5.0 2,192 4.4 3,488 6.2Bachelor's (a) (a) 2,957 6.8 2,953 5.9 2,952 5.3

F'TE scientists 29,970 100.0 34,964 100.0 40,027 100.0 45,488 100.0Function:

Teaching 11,780 39.3 14,843 42.5 17,416 43.5 22,231 48.9Research and development . . 12,983 43.3 13,821 39.5 15,581 38.9 16,335 35.9Other activities 5,207 17.4 6,300 18.0 7,030 17.6 6,922 15.2

'Not available.

Table C.2. Number of scientists employed in medical schools, by geographic division, 1965, 1967,1969, and 1971

Geographic division

January 1965a January 1967' January 1969a January 1971Number Percent

distributionNumber Percent

distributionNumber Percent

distributionNumber Percent

distributionUnited States, total 38,394 100.0 43,808 100.0 49,792 100.0 56,034 100.0

New England 3,264 8.5 3,578 8.2 4,277 8.6 5,335 9.5Middle Atlantic 11,620 30.3 13,227 30.2 14,706 29.5 15,659 27.9East North Central 6,435 16.8 7,076 16.2 8,171 16.4 9,340 16.7West North Central 1,646 4.3 3,071 7.0 3,268 6.6 3,875 6.9South Atlantic 6,346 16.5 6,738 15.4 7,033 14.1 7,700 13.7East South Central 1,592 4.1 1,873 4.3 2,230 4.5 2,291 4.1West South Central 2,369 6.2 2,698 6.2 3,416 6.9 4,013 7.2Mountain 832 2.2 1,167 2.7 1,327 2.7 1,294 2.3Pacific 3,667 9.6 3,743 8.5 4,746 9.5 5,917 10.6Outlying areas 623 1.6 637 1.5 618 1.2 610 1.1

'Revised to exclude healthprotessionats working primarily on patiencare.

Page 133: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Table C.3. Selected characteristics of graduate students receiving compensation for parttime services as scientistsin medical schools, by field and function, January 1965,1967, 1969, and 1971

Field of employmentand function

January 1965 January 1967 January 1969 January 1971Number Percent

distributionNumber Percent

distributionNumber Percent

distributionNumber Percent

distributionNumber of graduate students 3,425 100.0 4,801 100.0 5,374 100.0 6,773 100.0

Field of employment:Biological scientists 1,356 39.6 2,142 44.6 1,933 36.0 2,772 40.9Medical scientists 1,970 57.5 2,537 52.8 3,266 602 3,808 56.2All other scientists 99 2.9 122 2.5 175 3.3 193 2.9

FTE graduate students 1,603 100.0 2,278 100.0 2,596 100.0 3,001 100.0Function:

Teaching 628 39.2 862 37.8 1,057 40.7 1,328 44.3Research and development . . 884 55.1 1,358 59.6 1,336 51.5 1,528 50.9Other activities 91 5.7 58 2.5 203 7.8 145 4.8

Table C1. Number of technicians employed in medical schools, by field and function, January 1965,1967, 1969, and 1971

Field of employmentand function

January 1965 January 1967 January 1969 January 1971Number Percent

distributionNumber Percent

distributionNumber Percent

distributionNumber Percent

distributionNumber of technicians 16,153 100.0 19,800 100.0 20,138 100.0 21,350 100.0

Field of employment:Life science technicians . . . . 14,996 92.8 18,780 94.8 19,883 98.7 20,988 98.3

Biological sciences n/a n/a n/a 4,625 21.7Medical and healthrelated

sciences n/a n/a n/a 16,363 76.2All other science technicians 1,157 7.2 1,020 5.2 255 1.3 362 1.7

Function:Research and development . . 11,465 71.0 14,736 74.4 14,283 70.9 15,324 71.8Other activities 4,688 29.0 5,064 25.6 5,855 29.1 6,026 28.2

Note: Detail not available.

63

Page 134: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Table C5. Current R&D expenditures in medical schools. 1964, 1966, 1968, and 1970

(Dollars in thousands)

Item

1964 1966 1968 1970

AmountPercentof total Amount

Percentof total Amount

Percentof total Amount

Percentof total

Current R&D expenditures $440.057 100.0 $549,037 100.0 $703,043 100.0 $763,349 100.0

Character of work:Basic research 377,455 85.8 468,895 85.4 592.440 84.3 613,384 80.4

Applied research 57,435 13.0 73.171 13.3 102.060 14.5 125,677 16.5

Development 5,167 1.2 6,971 1.3 8,543 1.2 24,288 3.2

Field of science:Life sciences 434,375 99.9 538,723 99.4 689,032 99.2 732,121 99.1

Biological 96,108 22.1 130.724 24.1 177.957 25.6 181,087 24.5

Clinical medical 338.267 77.8 407,999 75.3 493,057 71.0 529,275 71.6

Other life sciences 18,018 2.6 21,759 2.9

All other sciences 515 .1 3,343 .6 5.468 .8 6.940 .9

Source of funds:Federal Government 284.039 64.5 369,172 67.2 474.210 67.4 502.783 65.9

Foundations and voluntary healthagencies 29,536 6.7 34,191 6.2 42,573 6.1 50,009 6.6

Institutions' own funds 98,426 22.4 110.779 20.2 144,595 20.6 153,356 20.1

State and local governments. . . . 11,493 2.6 13,546 2.5 18.078 2.6 24,692 3.2

All other sources 16,563 3.8 21.349 3.9 23.587 3.4 32.509 4.2

64

Page 135: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

0\

AP

PE

ND

IX C

Rep

rodu

ctio

n of

Sur

vey

For

m...

..n o

amo.

...B

.W...

..011

amm

orm

wam

=no

rea.

.....=

ww

.inm

alb.

......

11sy

NSF

FO

RM

412

, Nov

embe

r 19

700:

41.1

No

99 8

0263

App

rosa

l exp

ires

Dec

embe

r 31

. 197

1

NA

TIO

NA

L S

CIE

NC

E F

OU

ND

AT

ION

Was

hing

ton,

D.C

. 206

50

SU

RV

EY

OF

SC

IEN

TIF

IC A

CT

IVIT

IES

OF

INS

TIT

UT

ION

S O

FH

IGH

ER

ED

UC

AT

ION

, 197

1

Org

aniz

atio

ns a

re r

eque

sted

to c

ompl

ete

and

retu

rn th

is f

orm

to: N

atio

nal S

cien

ce F

ound

atio

nW

ashi

ngto

n, D

.C. 2

0550

Attn

: UN

ISG

Org

aniz

atio

nal U

nit:

(Ple

ase

corr

ect i

f na

me

or a

ddre

ss h

as c

hang

ed)

(Aggregate data from 105 medical schools)

The

blu

e qu

estio

nnai

re is

to b

e us

ed to

rep

ort d

ata

for

the

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

t des

igna

ted

in th

ebo

x at

upp

er r

ight

. The

que

stio

nnai

re r

eque

sts

two

type

s of

info

rmat

ion

on th

e sc

ient

ific

act

iviti

es o

fth

e de

sign

ated

org

aniz

atio

nal u

nit:

Part

1, e

mpl

oym

ent o

f pr

ofes

sion

al a

nd te

chni

cal p

erso

nnel

, and

Part

11,

cur

rent

and

cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t, an

din

stru

ctio

n.L

ist b

elow

the

nam

es o

f an

y re

sear

ch in

stitu

tes,

labo

rato

ries

, bur

eaus

, hos

pita

ls, o

r fo

unda

tions

incl

uded

in th

eor

-ga

niza

tiona

l uni

t cov

ered

in th

is r

epor

t:

Page 136: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Org

aniz

atio

ns a

rc r

eque

sted

to c

ompl

ete

and

retu

rn th

is f

orm

to:

Nat

iona

l Sci

ence

Fou

ndat

ion

Was

hing

ton,

D.C

. 205

50A

ttn: U

NIS

G

Organizational

Uni

t:(P

leas

e co

rrec

t if

nam

e or

add

ress

has

cha

nged

)

(Agg

rega

te d

ata

from

105

med

ical

sch

ools

)

Ara

The

blu

e qu

estio

nnai

re is

to b

e us

ed to

rep

ort d

ata

for

the

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

tde

sign

ated

in th

ebo

x at

upp

er r

ight

. The

que

stio

nnai

re r

eque

sts

two

type

s of

info

rmat

ion

on th

e sc

ient

ific

act

iviti

es o

fth

e de

sign

ated

org

aniz

atio

nal u

nit:

Part

I, e

mpl

oym

ent o

f pr

ofes

sion

al a

nd te

chni

cal p

erso

nnel

, and

Part

II,

cur

rent

and

cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t, an

din

stru

ctio

n.L

ist b

elow

the

nam

es o

f an

y re

sear

ch in

stitu

tes,

labo

rato

ries

, bur

eaus

, hos

pita

ls, o

r fo

unda

tions

incl

uded

in th

eor

-ga

niza

tiona

l uni

t cov

ered

in th

is r

epor

t:

Plea

se r

ead

the

encl

osed

inst

ruct

ions

bef

ore

com

plet

ing

this

for

m. W

here

exac

t dat

a ar

e no

t ava

il-ab

le, e

stim

ates

are

acc

epta

ble.

Ent

er "

0 "

asa

tota

l rat

her

than

leav

e an

item

bla

nk.

The

dat

a re

ques

ted

in th

is q

uest

ionn

aire

will

be

publ

ishe

das

sta

tistic

al to

tals

or

aggr

egat

es f

or a

llin

stitu

tions

or

for

sele

cted

gro

ups

of in

stitu

tions

.In

cer

tain

inst

ance

s, h

owev

er,the

Nat

iona

l Sci

ence

Foun

datio

n m

ay w

ish

to p

ublis

h se

lect

ed s

ui v

ey d

ata

with

the

inst

itutio

n id

entif

ied.

Plea

se in

dica

tebe

low

the

num

ber

of a

ny it

em th

at s

houl

d no

t be

publ

ishe

d w

ith in

stitu

tiona

lid

entif

icat

ion:

,.M1I

MM

1W..t

MV

ON

INLM

EN

IOne

s.M

07.,

arv-

rwir

wm

vrv.

.mw

w

Page 137: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

PA

RT

IPE

RS

ON

NE

L D

AT

A(I

nclu

des

item

s 1

to 6

of t

he s

urve

y qu

estio

nnai

re)

Per

sonn

el d

ata

are

to b

e re

port

ed a

s of

Jan

uary

197

1 or

as

clos

e as

pos

sibl

e th

eret

o.

SE

CT

ION

A. N

UM

BE

R O

F S

CIE

NT

IST

S A

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RS

MIA

M11

1!(N

OT

E: F

igur

es o

n gr

adua

te s

tude

nts

enga

ged

part

tim

e as

sci

entis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

sho

uld

be r

epor

ted

in S

ectio

n B

).

Item 1.

Ful

l-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

y fie

ld a

nd fu

nctio

n in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyed

; and

tota

l ful

l.tim

e eq

uiva

lent

s, b

yfu

nctio

n, J

anua

ry 1

971

FIE

LD O

F E

MP

LOY

ME

NT

TO

TA

L'T

EA

CH

ING

(1)

(2)

R &

D(3

)

OT

HE

RA

CT

IVIT

IES

(4)

a. e

ngin

eers

(to

tal)

(1)

Aer

onau

tical

eng

inee

rs

(2)C

hem

ical

eng

inee

rs

(3)C

ivil

engi

neer

s

(4)

Ele

ctric

al e

ngin

eers

(5)

Mec

hani

cal e

ngin

eers

(6)

Oth

er e

ngin

eers

0110

756

1101

11

0112

0113

0114

0115

0116

6 1

39 2 261

17

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)C

hem

ists

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)

Phy

sici

sts

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

. ..

.

0120

237

67M

LII4

Sr=

,=71

.7t7

=10

2,4,

118H

LWO

RC

ILT

SIM

EN

IIII

0121

172

4.8

0122

0123

0124

164.

612

3._

54 1111

4.1

c. M

athe

mat

iCia

ns (

tota

l)

d. L

ife s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

0130

4430

0140

3896

719

, 443

13_0

87_

0141

0142

1

7, 3

363,

729

31,6

3o15

,644

3, 2

7710

,310

e. P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

1.S

ocia

l sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soc

iolo

gist

s

(3)P

oliti

cal s

cien

tists

0163

(4)

His

toria

ns01

64

(S)

Oth

er s

ocia

l sci

entis

ts01

65

291+

144

102

23j

862

2

111

326

97

5, 9

371

26o

5,67

64.

8 15,

ag_

127

2743

g. T

otal

(su

m o

f a to

I)01

0039

,831

19,7

5813

, 993

6,08

0h.

FT

E d

istr

ibut

ion,

by

func

tion

..

0190

39,8

3118

,975

14,4

766,

38o

Item

2.

Ful

l-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

y fie

ld in

whi

ch p

rimer

ly e

mpl

oyed

and

hig

hest

ear

ned

degr

ee, J

anua

ry 1

971

TO

TA

L'P

H.D

.O

RM

.D.,

D.D

.S.,

MA

ST

ER

'SB

AC

HE

LOR

'SO

R T

HE

Page 138: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Item

2.

a.E

ngin

eers

(to

tal)

(1)

Aer

onau

tical

eng

inee

rs

(2)C

hem

ical

eng

inee

rs

(3)

Civ

il en

gine

ers

(4)

Ele

ctric

al e

ngin

eers

(5)

Mec

hani

cal e

ngin

eers

(6)

Oth

er e

ngin

eers

0110

756

1101

11

0112

601

131

101

1439

133 1

5_01

152

101

1626

51.

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Che

mis

ts

(2)

Ear

thsc

ient

ists

(3)

Phys

icis

ts

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

. ..

0120

237

6716

46

0121

172

4812

301

22

0123

548

401

2411

11c.

Mat

hem

atic

ians

(to

tal)

0130

4411

303

d. L

ife s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

0140

3967

443

5-3-

933

0141

11

0142

7,33

63,

7915

,614

3,27

726

001

4331

, 63o

10,3

105,

67e.

Psy

chol

ogis

ts (

tota

l)01

5029

4.14

410

248

f.S

ocia

l sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soc

iolo

gist

s

(3)

Pol

itica

l sci

entis

ts

(4)

His

toria

ns

(5)O

ther

soc

ial s

cien

tists

0160

2186

5475

0161

22

0162

111

2601

63

0164

101

6597

2727

43

g.T

otal

(su

m o

f a to

.001

0039

,831

122.

758

18,9

7513,993

14,4

766 080

6, 3

8oh.

FT

E d

istr

ibut

ion,

by

func

tionb

..

0190

39,8

31F

ull-t

ime

scie

ntis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

, by

field

in w

hich

prim

er ly

em

ploy

ed a

nd h

ighe

st e

arne

d de

gree

, Jan

uary

FIE

LD

OF

EM

PLO

YM

EN

T

a.E

ngin

eers

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

c. M

athe

mat

icia

nsd.

Life

sci

entis

tse.

Psy

chol

ogis

ts

f.S

ocia

l sci

entis

ts

g.T

otal

(su

m o

f a to

I)

1971

TO

TA

L°(1

)

PH

.D.

OR

SC

.D.

(2)

M.D

.,D

.D.S

.,E

TC

.(3

)

MA

STE

R'S

(4)

BA

CH

ELO

R'S

OR

TH

EE

QU

IVA

LEN

T(S

)

0210

7412

3230

0220

126

2959

0230

442

128

0240

38,9

678,

938

25,2

392,

33,5

2.47

502

5029

4.18

162

37 752

00

604

0260

215

62_

514

280

0200

81'T

otal

s in

item

s la

to lg

, col

umn

1, s

houl

d be

the

tam

e as

the

corr

espo

ndin

g to

tals

in it

ems

2a to

2g,

col

umn

1.bT

he to

tal r

epor

ted

in it

em lh

, col

umn

1, s

houl

d, b

y de

finiti

on, b

e th

e sa

me

as th

e to

tal i

n ite

m lg

, col

umn

1. H

owev

er, t

he F

TE

dist

ribu-

tion

by fu

nctio

n (c

olum

ns 2

, 3, a

nd 4

) w

ill n

ot n

eces

saril

y co

inci

de w

ith th

e fu

nctio

nal d

istr

ibut

ion

on a

"pr

imar

ily e

mpl

oyed

"bas

is in

item

1g.

Page 139: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Item

Par

ttitn

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

y fie

ld a

nd fu

nctio

n in

whi

chpr

imar

ily e

mpl

oyed

; and

tota

l ful

l-tim

e eq

uiva

lent

s,3.

by fu

nctio

n, J

anua

ry 1

971.

(E

xclu

de g

radu

ate

stud

ents

her

e bu

tre

port

them

in S

ectio

n 9)

Eng

inee

rs (

tota

l)

(I)

Aer

onau

tical

eng

inee

rs

(2)C

hem

ical

eng

inee

rs...

(3)C

ivil

engi

neer

s

(4)

Ele

ctri

cal e

ngin

eers

(5)M

echa

nica

l eng

inee

rs

(6)

Oth

er e

ngin

eers

(1)

Che

mis

ts

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)

Phys

icis

ts

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

Mat

hem

atic

ians

(to

tal)

d. L

ife

scie

ntis

ts (

tota

l)

) A

gric

ultu

ral s

cien

tists...

..(2

) B

iolo

gica

l sci

entis

ts

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

f.So

cial

sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soci

olog

ists

(3)

Polit

ical

sci

entis

ts

(4)

His

tori

ans

(5)

Oth

er s

ocia

l sci

entis

ts

g. T

otal

(su

mof

a to

f)

h. F

TE

dis

trib

utio

n, b

y fu

nctio

nb.

..

0341

303

421,

225

0343

14,8

3403

30i3

9S

330

--03

6023

8L

a.03

61

0362

803

63

Par

t-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

y fie

ld in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyed

and

hig

hest

earn

ed d

egre

e, J

anua

ry 1

971.

FIE

LD

OF

EM

PLO

YM

EN

T

Page 140: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

C'

-.4

Item

4.

(6)

Oth

er e

ngin

eers

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(I)

Che

mis

ts

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tist

(3)

Phys

icis

ts

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)

d. L

ifc

scie

ntis

ts to

tal)

0) A

gric

ultu

ral s

cicn

tists

.....

..(2

) B

iolo

gica

l sci

entis

ts

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

c. P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

1. S

ocia

l sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soci

olog

ists

(3)

Polit

ical

sci

cntis

ts

(4)

His

tori

ans

(5)O

ther

soc

ial s

cien

tists

0316

0320

2203

217

303

22

0323

0324

0330

0340

4 11 116

,062

0341

303

421,

225

A72

346

4-38

0343

14 1

834

9212

214

- 26

21

11,5

089

---

--13

-1__

___

_

0360

2_1_

L1

111

9,84

8)1

.,72

6 I

1,1t

88

0350

W6

0363

636

3

0362

82

0364

0365

g. T

otal

(sun

: of a

to f)

h. F

TE

dis

trib

utio

n, b

y fu

nctio

nb.

.

0300

)390

1516

,203

5, 6

57

129,

930

21

4,77

71

1211

96t

3,25

61,

859

5)12

Par

t-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

y fie

ld in

whi

chpr

imar

ily e

mpl

oyed

and

hig

hest

ear

ned

degr

ee, J

anua

ry 1

971.

HE

LD O

F E

MP

LOY

ME

NT

TO

TA

L°(1

)

PH

.D.

OR

SC

.D.

(2)

M.D

.,D

.D.S

.,E

TC

.(3

)

-MA

ST

ER

'S(4

)

BA

CH

ELO

R'S

OR

TH

E.

EQ

UIV

AL

EN

T(5

)a.

Eng

inee

rs

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

r.M

athe

mat

icia

ns

d. L

ife

scic

ntis

ts

e.P

sych

olog

ists

f.So

cial

sci

entis

ts

0410

604

2022

0430

104

4016

206

204

5089

0460

4 1.1

_1_7

9112

,993

la30

952

326

la23

_5_

-12

----

- .=

.7-6

g.T

otal

(sum

of a

to fl

..

0400

16,2

031

8411

13,0

2398

83)

8,..

.---

.....-

-....

....-

----

----

----

----

° lo

tals

in it

ems

3a to

3g,

col

umn

, sho

uld

be th

e sa

me

as th

eco

rres

pond

ing

tota

ls 'n

item

s 4a

to 4

g, c

olum

n 1.

bile

tota

ls in

item

3h

conv

ertin

gri

p% o

n pa

tttin

te e

mpl

oym

ent i

nto

FTE

's w

illne

ce,..

.7ily

dif

fer

from

hea

d-co

unt t

otal

s in

item

31.

1 i 1 1 $ 1

Page 141: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

SE

CT

ION

B. N

UM

BE

R O

F G

RA

DU

AT

E S

TU

DE

NT

S E

NG

AG

ED

PA

RT

TIM

E A

S S

CIE

NT

IST

S A

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RS

Item

5.

lG

radu

ate

stud

ents

rec

eivi

ng c

ompe

nsat

ion

and

func

tion

in w

hich

prim

arily

eng

aged

;fo

r pa

rt-t

ime

serv

ices

as

scie

ntis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

at y

our

inst

itutio

n, b

y fie

ldan

d to

tal F

TE

's, b

y fu

nctio

n, J

anua

ry 1

971.

FIE

LD

OF

EM

PLO

YM

EN

TT

OT

AL

(1)

TE

AC

HIN

G(2

)R

& D

(3)

OT

HE

RA

CT

IVIT

IES

(4)

a.E

ngin

eers

(to

tal)

(1)

Aer

onau

tical

eng

inee

rs

(2)

Che

mic

al e

ngin

eers

(3)

Civ

il en

gine

ers

(4)

Ele

ctri

cale

ngin

eers

(5)

Mec

hani

cal

engi

neer

s

(6)O

ther

engi

neer

s

0510

93

6_

0511

0512

52

0513

0514

0515

1_

1_

0516

3_

3b.

scie

ntis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Che

mis

ts

(2) E

arth

sci

entis

ts

(3)

Phys

icis

ts

(4)O

ther

phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts .

..

0520

8352

2011

0521

511.

34.

2005

22

0523

0524

2918

11c.

Mat

hem

atic

ians

(to

tal)

0530

22

,

d. L

ife

scie

ntis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

0540

6, 5

8o21

934

3 38

026

605

41_

0542

2, 7

7291

1.8

1, 9

861,

765

1, 6

1559 207

0543

3,80

8e.

Psyc

holo

gist

s(t

otal

)05

5093

311.

59f.

Soci

al s

cien

tists

(tot

al)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)S

ocio

logi

sts

(3)P

oliti

cal s

cien

tists

(4)

His

tori

ans

(5)

Oth

er s

ocia

l sci

entis

ts

0560

61

0561

0562

_

0563

0564

_

0565

5-

5g.

Tot

al(s

um o

f a to

n05

006,

773

3, 0

24.

3, 4

.67

282

h. F

TE

dis

trib

utio

n, b

y fu

nctio

n05

903,

001

1,32

81,

528

145

a T

he to

tals

in it

em 5

h co

nver

ting

figu

res

on p

art-

time

serv

ices

into

FT

E's

will

nec

essa

rily

dif

fer

from

hea

d-co

unt t

otal

s in

item

5g.

SE

CT

ION

C. N

UM

BE

R O

F T

EC

HN

ICIA

NS

EM

PLO

YE

D IN

TH

E S

CIE

NC

ES

AN

D E

NG

INE

ER

ING

Item

6.

Tec

hnic

ians

, by

field

and

func

tion

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed,

Janu

ary

1971

.1

......

.__

En

a 11

,I

OT

HE

R

Page 142: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

r

T(5

) M

echa

nica

l eng

inee

rs

(6)

Oth

er e

ngin

eers

0.51

5

0516

3.

3b.

Phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Che

mis

ts

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)

Phys

icis

ts

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

..

.

0520

8352

2011

052

.54

3420

0522

0523

_

0524

2918

11c.

Mat

hem

atic

ians

(to

tal)

0530

22

d. L

ife

scie

ntis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

0540

6,58

02,

934

13,

380

266

0541

___I2

772

3,8o

805

4294

81,

765

1,61

5 59

5 207

0543

1, 2

86 34e.

Psyc

holo

gist

s (t

otal

)05

5093

f.So

cial

sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soci

olog

ists

(3)

Polit

ical

sci

entis

ts

(4)

His

tori

ans

(5)

Oth

er s

ocia

l sci

entis

ts

0560

61

0561

_

0562

_

0563

__

0564

_

0565

55

g. T

otal

(su

m O

a to

1)

0500

6,77

33,

024

3,46

728

2h.

FT

E d

istr

ibut

ion,

by

func

tion'

..

0590

3,00

11,

328

1,52

814

5T

he to

tals

in it

em S

h co

nver

ting

figu

res

on p

art-

time

serv

ices

into

FT

E's

will

nec

essa

rily

dif

fer

from

hea

d-co

unt t

otal

s in

item

Sg.

.PS

EC

TIO

N C

. NU

MB

ER

OF

TE

CH

NIC

IAN

S E

MP

LOY

ED

IN T

HE

SC

IEN

CE

S A

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

G

Item

6.T

echn

icia

ns, b

y fie

ld a

nd fu

nctio

n in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyed

, Jan

uary

197

1

FIE

LD

OF

EM

PLO

YM

EN

TT

OT

A L

(I)

R & (2

)DO

TH

ER

AC

TIV

ITIE

S(3

)

a. E

ngin

eeri

ng te

chni

cian

s

b. P

hysi

cal.s

cien

ce te

chni

cian

s

c.B

iolo

gica

l sci

ence

tech

nici

ans

(inc

lude

agr

icul

tura

l)

d. M

edic

al a

nd h

ealth

-rel

ated

tech

nici

ans

e. S

ocia

l sci

ence

tech

nici

ans

0610

8868

20

0620

119

8435

0630

4,62

531

_115

5

11,6

31

1.21

.70

4, 7

3206

4016

, 363

0650

155

8662

...6,

026

f.T

otal

(su

m o

f a

to e

)06

0021

, 350

15, 3

24

Page 143: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

0

PA

RT

II--

FIN

AN

CIA

L D

AT

A

(Inc

lude

s ite

ms

7 to

13

of th

e su

rvey

que

stic

nnai

re)

FIN

AN

CIA

L D

AT

A R

EPO

RT

ED

IN

PA

RT

II

AR

E F

OR

TH

E F

ISC

AL

YE

AR

, WH

ICH

BE

GA

N O

N J

UL

Y 1

,1969

AN

DE

ND

ED

ON

JU

NE

30,

1970,

OR

YO

UR

IN

STIT

UT

ION

'SE

QU

IVA

LE

NT

FIS

CA

L Y

EA

R. S

PEC

IFY

TH

E E

ND

ING

DA

TE

IF

DIF

FER

EN

T F

RO

M A

BO

VE

:

AL

L F

INA

NC

IAL

DA

TA

RE

QU

EST

ED

ON

TH

IS F

OR

MSH

OU

LD

BE

RE

POR

TE

D I

N T

HO

USA

ND

S O

FD

OL

LA

RS;

FOR

EX

AM

PLE

, AN

EX

PEN

DIT

UR

E O

F $2

5,34

2 SH

OU

LD

BE

RO

UN

DE

D T

O T

HE

NE

AR

EST

TH

OU

SAN

D D

OL

LA

RS

AN

D R

EPO

RT

ED

IN

TH

E A

PPR

OPR

IAT

E C

OL

UM

NS

AS

$25.

*The numbers within parentheses in items 7 through 10 include an

estimate for departmental research and other R&D costs for which

most universities and colleges do not maintain separate records.

The numbers outside the parentheses represent separately-budgeted

R&D expenditures as reported by institutions included in the

survey.

All charts and appendix tables include estimates for nonseparately

budgeted R&D expenditures.

Page 144: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

AL

L F

INA

NC

IAL

DA

TA

RE

QU

EST

ED

ON

TH

IS F

OR

MSH

OU

LD

BE

RE

POR

TE

D I

N T

HO

USA

ND

S O

F D

OL

LA

RS;

FOR

EX

AM

PLE

, AN

EX

PEN

DIT

UR

E O

F $2

5,34

2 SH

OU

LD

BE

RO

UN

DE

D T

O T

HE

NE

AR

EST

TH

OU

SAN

D D

OL

LA

RS

AN

D R

EPO

RT

ED

IN

TH

E A

PPR

OPR

IAT

E C

OL

UM

NS

AS

$25.

*The numbers within parentheses in items 7 through 10 include an

estimate for departmental research and other R&D costs for which

most universities and colleges do not maintain separate records.

The numbers outside the parentheses represent separately-budgeted

R&D expenditures as reported by institutions included in the survey.

All charts and appendix tables include estimates for nonseparately

budgeted R&D expenditures.

*In item 11 the numbers within parentheses represent both direct and

indirect costs for instruction.

These numbers exclude estimates

for departmental research but include indirect costs in item 12

associated with instruction.

The numbers outside the parentheses

represent total direct expenditures for instruction and departmental

research as reported by survey respondents.

All charts and appendix

tables represent total instruction expenditures.

Page 145: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

SECTION D

CURRENT EXPENDITURES FOR SEPARATELY BUDGETED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D)

If

your

inst

itutio

n di

d no

t hav

e an

y cu

rren

t exp

endi

ture

s fo

r se

para

tely

bud

gete

d re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent i

n 19

69-7

0 ch

eck

"non

e" in

the

spac

e pr

ovid

ed h

ere

and

skip

to S

ectio

n E

.N

one.

(Exc

lude

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r ca

pita

l equ

ipm

ent a

nd f

acili

ties.

)

Item 7.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r se

para

tely

bud

gete

d re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent,

by s

ourc

e of

fun

ds,

1969

-70

SOU

RC

E O

F FU

ND

ST

HO

USA

ND

S O

F D

OL

LA

RS

INT

ER

NA

L U

SE O

NL

Y

a. F

eder

al G

over

nmen

tb.

Sta

te g

over

nmen

t

c.L

ocal

gov

ernm

ent

d. F

ound

atio

nse.

Vol

unta

ry h

ealth

age

ncie

s

f.In

dust

ry

g.In

stitu

tion'

s ow

n fu

nds

h. O

ther

sou

rces

0710

S50

2,78

3eq

uals

8d

and

9d (

Col

. 2)

0720

17,5

7807

307,

11/4

0740

25,6

2007

5024

,389

0760

13,6

1807

7023

,167

(153

,356

)*0780

18 8

91i.

Tot

al (

sum

ofa

to kJ°

0700

s63

3 16

0(7

63,3

49)

*eq

uals

8d

and

9d (

Col

. 1)

Item 8.

and

deve

lopm

ent,

by m

ajor

cos

tT

otal

and

fed

eral

ly f

inan

ced

curr

ent e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

rese

arch

item

, 196

9-70

.

CO

ST I

TE

M

TH

OU

SAN

DS

OF

DO

LL

AR

S

TO

TA

L(1

)FE

DE

RA

L G

OV

ER

NM

EN

T(2

)

a. D

irec

t wag

es a

nd s

alar

ies

b. A

ll ot

her

dire

ct c

osts

(in

clud

ing

mat

eria

ls a

nd s

uppl

ies)

c. I

ndir

ect c

osts

rei

mbu

rsed

or

reim

-bu

rsab

le

0810

S33

8 67

3(4

16,7

80)*

S26

7,55

2

0820

201,

582

(214

604

) *

156,

309

78,9

2208

3092

,905

(131

965

) *

d. T

otal

(su

mof

ato c)a

0800

$63

3,16

0(7

63,3

49)*

502,

783

Item 9.

Tot

al a

nd f

eder

ally

fin

ance

d cu

rren

t exp

endi

ture

s fo

r se

para

tely

bud

gete

d re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent,

by ty

pe o

fR&D

activ

ity, 1

969-

70.

TH

OU

SAN

DS

OF

DO

LL

AR

S

Page 146: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

c. L

ocal

gov

ernm

ent

d. F

ound

atio

ns

e. V

olun

tary

hea

lth a

genc

ies

f.In

dust

ry

g.In

stitu

tion'

s ow

n fu

nds

h. O

ther

sou

rces

I--

0730

TH

OU

SA

ND

S O

F D

OLL

AR

S

...

7,11

407

4025,620

0750

24,389

0760

13,618

0770

23,167

(153

,356

)*07

80

i.T

otal

(su

m o

f a to

11)

1107

00S

633,160

(763,349)*

equa

ls 8

d an

d 9d

(C

ol. 1

)

Item

8.T

otal

and

fede

rally

fina

nced

cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r se

para

tely

bud

gete

d re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent,

by m

ajor

cos

tite

m, 1

969-

70.

CO

ST

ITE

M

TH

OU

SA

ND

S O

F D

OLL

AR

S

TO

TA

L(1

)F

ED

ER

AL

GO

VE

RN

ME

NT

(2)

a. D

irect

wag

es a

nd s

alar

ies

b. A

ll ot

her

dire

ct c

osts

(in

clud

ing

mat

eria

ls a

nd s

uppl

ies)

c. In

dire

ct c

osts

rei

mbu

rsed

or

reim

-bu

rsab

le

0810

$ 33

8,67

3(416,780)*

S267,552

0820

2011

582

(214

,604

)*15

6,30

9

78,922

0830

92 9

05t

(131

,965

)*

d. T

otal

(su

m o

f a to

c)a

0800

$633,160

(763,349)*

502,783

Item

9.

Tot

al a

nd fe

dera

lly fi

nanc

ed c

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

rese

arch

and

dev

elop

men

t, by

type

of R

&D

activ

ity,

1969

-70.

TY

PE

OF

R&

D A

CT

IVIT

Y

TH

OU

SA

ND

S O

F D

OLL

AR

S

TO

TA

L(1

)FE

DE

RA

L G

OV

ER

NM

EN

T(2

)

a.B

asic

res

earc

h

b. A

pplie

d re

sear

ch

c. D

evel

opm

ent

0910

$505

,326

(613 384) *

$401 846

f 092

010

3,54

6(125,677)*

80,922

0930

24,288

20,0

15d.

Tot

al (

sum

of a

to c

)a09

005633,160

(763,349)*

502,783

°Tot

als

in it

cms

7i, 8

d (C

ol. 1

) an

d 9d

(C

ol. 1

) sh

ould

be

iden

tical

. Sim

ilarly

, fig

ures

rcp

ortc

d in

item

s 7a

, 8d

(Col

. 2)

and

9d(C

ol. 2

) sh

ould

be

iden

tical

. If f

igur

es fo

r th

c fo

rego

ing

itcm

s ar

c no

t con

sist

ent,

plea

se g

ive

reas

ons

in "

Rem

arks

" at

thc

cnd

of th

e qu

estio

nnai

re.

Page 147: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Item

10.

Tot

al a

nd fe

dera

lly fi

nanc

ed c

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

lybu

dget

ed b

asic

and

app

lied

rese

arch

,by

fiel

d of

sci

ence

, 196

9-70

FIE

LD

OF

SCIE

NC

E

TH

OU

SAN

DS

OF

DO

LL

AR

S

TO

TA

L(1

)FE

DE

RA

L G

OV

ER

NM

EN

T(2

)

a. E

ngin

eeri

ng (

tota

l)10

1062

E60

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

ces

(tot

al)

1020

S2,185

S1 214

(1)

Ast

rono

my

(2)

Che

mis

try

(3)

Phys

ics

(4)

Phys

ical

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1021

1022

1 611

r842

1023

574

1024

c. E

nvir

onm

enta

l sci

ence

s (t

otal

)10

30E

323

d. M

athe

mat

ics

(tot

al)

1040

$746

S38

2e.

Lif

e sc

ienc

es (

tota

l)1

050

$601,932 (732 121 *

$47

8,46

2(1

) B

iolo

gica

l

(2)

Clin

ical

med

ical

(3)

Lif

e sc

ienc

es, N

EC

1051

148,925 (181 087) *

121,

609

1052

435,154

(529

,275

)a34

2,47

410

5317.853 ( 21.759)*

f.Ps

ycho

logy

(to

tal)

1060

979

387

9(1

) B

iolo

gica

l asp

ects

(2)

Soci

al a

spec

ts

(3)

Psyc

holo

gica

l sci

ence

s, N

EC

...

1061

125

1062

290

1063

564

g. Social sciences (total)

1070

S1

,541

(1)

Eco

nom

ics

(2)

Polit

ical

sci

ence

(3)

Soci

olog

y

(4)

Soci

al s

cien

ces,

NE

C

1071

79

1072

262

1073

646

554

1074

h. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

(to

tal)

1080

woo

$1.104

$608,872 (739,061)*

$482,768

".T

otal

(sum

of a

toh)

If y

our

inst

itutio

n ha

s de

velo

pmen

t fun

ds p

leas

e do

nol

dist

ribu

te th

em b

y fi

eld

of s

cien

ce. T

otal

s in

10i

(co

lum

ns1

and

2)sh

ould

be

iden

tical

with

the

sum

of

lines

9a

and

9b (

colu

mns

1 a

nd2)

.

SE

CT

ION

EC

UR

RE

NT

EX

PE

ND

ITU

RE

S F

OR

INS

TR

UC

TIO

N A

ND

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

AL

RE

SE

AR

CH

IN T

HE

SC

IEN

CE

S A

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

G

Item

11.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r in

stru

ctio

n an

d de

part

men

tal r

esea

rch

in th

e sc

ienc

es a

nd e

ngin

eerin

g, b

yfie

ld o

f sci

ence

, 196

9-70

FIE

LD

OF

SCIE

NC

ET

OT

AL

. IN

STR

UC

TIO

N A

ND

DE

PAR

T.M

EN

TA

L R

ESE

AR

CH

(TH

OU

SAN

DS

OF

DO

LL

AR

S)IN

TE

RN

AL

USE

ON

LY

a. E

npin

eeri

nv_

I1

ffn

C.

Page 148: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

_._

,_ _

___

_ __

_.

____

_._

_

(4)

Phys

ical

sci

ence

s, N

EC

.. 1

..10

24

c. E

nvir

onm

enta

l sci

ence

s (t

otal

)10

30S

323

3d.

Mat

hem

atic

s (t

otal

)10

40$

746

e.L

ife

scie

nces

(to

tal)

1050

$ 601,932 (732,121 *

$478 462

(1)

Bio

logi

cal

(2)

Clin

ical

med

ical

(3)

Lif

e sc

ienc

es, N

EC

1051

148,925 (181,087)*

121,609

1052

435,154 (529,275)*

342,474

1053

17.853 ( 21.759)*

14.379

f.Ps

ycho

logy

(to

tal)

1060

979

879

(1)

Bio

logi

cal a

spec

ts

(2)

Soci

al a

spec

ts

(3)

Psyc

holo

gica

l sci

ence

s, N

EC

1061

125

_ ___.

._

121

1062

290

204

1063

564

554

g. S

ocia

l sci

ence

s (t

otal

)10

703

1, 5

4184

4(1

) E

cono

mic

s(2

) Po

litic

al s

cien

ce

.(3)

Soc

iolo

gy

(4)

Soci

al s

cien

ces,

NE

C

1071

79

63

1072

262

33

1073

646

345

1074

554

398

h. Other sciences, NEC (total) 1

080

$1.104

S927

i.

Tot

al (

sum

of

a to

h)

1000

$608,872 (739,061)*

$482,768

If y

our

inst

itutio

n ha

s de

velo

pmen

t fun

ds p

leas

e do

not

dis

trib

ute

them

by

fiel

d of

sci

ence

. Tot

als i

n 10

1(co

lum

ns1

and

2)sh

ould

be

iden

tical

with

the

sum

of

lines

9a

and

9b (

colu

mns

1 a

nd 2

).

SE

CT

ION

EC

UR

RE

NT

EX

PE

ND

ITU

RE

S F

OR

INS

TR

UC

TIO

N A

ND

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

AL

RE

SE

AR

CH

IN T

HE

SC

IEN

CE

S A

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

G

Item

11.

Cur

rent

' exp

endi

ture

s fo

r in

stru

ctio

n an

d de

part

men

tal r

esea

rch

in th

e sc

ienc

es a

nden

gine

erin

g, b

yfie

ld o

f sci

ence

, 196

9-70

FIE

LD

OF

SCIE

NC

ET

OT

AL

. IN

STR

UC

TIO

N A

ND

DE

PAR

TM

EN

TA

L R

ESE

AR

CH

(TH

OU

SAN

DS

OF

DO

LL

AR

S)IN

TE

RN

AL

USE

ON

LY

a. E

ngin

eeri

ngb.

Phy

sica

l and

env

iron

men

tal s

cien

ces.

. _c.

Mat

hem

atic

sd.

Lif

e sc

ienc

ese.

Psy

chol

ogy

f.So

cial

sci

ence

sg.

Oth

er s

cien

ces,

NE

C

1110

311

2082

1 781

212

*03

*11

3011

4053969

573,

507

1150

92

1 326

1160

165

223

*11

704,209

5,037 3*

h. T

otal

(su

m o

f a

to 9

)11

00$

545,834

(581,403)*

Item

12.

Est

imat

e th

e do

llar

amou

nt o

f ove

rhea

d or

indi

rect

cos

ts a

lloca

ble

to th

e in

-st

ruct

ion

and

depa

rtm

enta

l res

earc

h ac

tiviti

es r

epor

ted

abov

e (it

em 1

1)

1200

TH

OU

SAN

DS

OF

DO

LL

AR

S

$ 16

5,76

3

Page 149: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

SE

CT

ION

F

CA

PIT

AL

EX

PE

ND

ITU

RE

S F

OR

SC

IEN

TIF

ICA

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

G F

AC

ILIT

IES

AN

D

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

FO

R R

ES

EA

RC

H, D

EV

ELO

PM

EN

T,

AN

D IN

ST

RU

CT

ION

Item 13

.

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

scie

ntifi

c an

d en

gine

erin

gfa

cilit

ies

and

equi

pmen

t for

res

earc

h, d

evel

opm

ent,

and

inst

ruct

ion,

1by

fiel

d of

sci

ence

, sou

rce

of fu

nds,

and

purp

ose,

196

9.70

.P

rora

te a

ny e

xpen

ditu

res

inte

nded

for

use

in tc

vo o

r m

ore

field

s of

sci

ence

and

for

R&

D a

nd g

radu

ate

and

unde

rgra

duat

ein

stru

ctio

n.,

Do

not i

nclu

de a

ny m

ater

ials

and

sup

plie

s re

port

edun

der

curr

ent-

exp

endi

ture

s in

Sec

tion

D o

r S

ectio

nE

. Inc

lude

cur

rent

fund

exp

endi

-

ture

s fo

r eq

uipm

ent a

nd fa

cilit

ies

asw

ell a

s pl

ant a

nd o

ther

fund

s.

FIE

LD O

F S

CIE

NC

E

SO

UR

CE

OF

FU

ND

S (

TH

OU

SA

ND

S O

F D

OLL

AR

S)

TO

TA

L(I

)

FE

DE

RA

LG

OV

ER

N-

ME

NT

ST

AT

EA

ND

LO

CA

LG

OV

ER

NM

EN

T

OT

HE

RS

OU

RC

ES

(4)

(2)

(3)

111

All

purp

oses

(to

tal)

a. E

ngin

eerin

gb.

Phy

sica

l and

env

ironm

enta

l sci

ence

s

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife s

cien

ces

e. P

sych

olog

y

f.S

ocia

l sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s,N

EC

1310

1320

1330

1340

1350

89 10

202_

843 10

1360

1370

h. T

otal

(sum

of

a to

I)13

004,

37o

_s

207,

322

13.2

13.3

Res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t and

/or

grad

uate

inst

ruct

ion

14

19

77,5

72_

7.31

1_19

510

_1,9

721,

774

Y5,

303

79,5

76

50

51,7

69 624

52,4

43

a. E

ngin

eerin

g

b. P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal s

cien

ces

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife s

cien

ces

.:.P

sych

olog

y

1.S

ocia

l sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1311

1321

1331

1341

1351

S

1361

7211

;-

101

182,

074

73,0

1610

10-

-

11 965

,385

47

43,6

73

1371

h. T

otal

(sum

of

a to

/1

Und

ergr

adua

te in

stru

ctio

n

1301

2 82

9$

184

951,

147

74-

188

1:27

466

640

844

128

a. E

ngin

eerin

g13

12

b. P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal s

cien

ces

1322

c. M

athe

mat

ics

1332

d. L

ife s

cien

ces

1342

e. P

sych

olog

y13

52

f.S

ocia

l sci

ence

s13

62

.A

te,

r13

72

-s

1714

20,7

694,

563

8,11

08,

096

4182

550

021

6

Page 150: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

a. E

ngin

eerin

g

b. P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal s

cien

ces

Mat

hem

atic

s

d. L

ife s

cien

ces

e. P

sych

olog

y

I.S

ocia

l sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

i...

1310

S-

89 10

S-

--

1320

14

25

1330

19

-13

4020

2:84

3 1077,579

711_195

1350

10_5

1,76

9

1360

-_

1370

4,37

01

972

P1

77

624

......

......

=.1

244

h. T

otal

(su

nsof

a to

,a)

1300

S20

7322

79 576

0

13.2

Res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t and

/or

grad

uate

inst

ruct

ion

a. E

ngin

eerin

g

b. P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal s

cien

ces

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife s

cien

ces

e. P

sych

olog

y

f.S

ocia

l sci

ence

s

g.O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1311

S-

S-

--

1321

7214

1

11

'4.7

1331

109

-13

41182,074

73,03.6

65,385

43,673

1351

1010

--

1361

--

--

1371

2,82

91,

11}7

1274

408

h. T

otal

(tu

rn c

ote

to g

l13

01S

181.

,095

S74,188

66,679

44,128

13.3

.6.....

,....-

.....:

..v.

Und

ergr

adua

te in

stru

ctio

n

a. E

ngin

eerin

g

b. P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal s

cien

ces

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife s

cien

ces

Psy

chol

ogy

1.S

ocia

l sci

ence

s

g.O

ther

sci

ence

s,N

EC

1312

S-

17S

- --

-13

2214

3

1332

--

--

1342

20,7

694,563

8,110

8,096

1352

--

--

1362

--

1372

1,541

825

S--

--88

500

216

h. T

otal

(sun

s W

e to

g)

1302

extr

apa

ge.

S22

327

624

8,31

5R

EM

AR

KS

:If

add

ition

al s

pace

is n

eaed

,att&

ch a

n

NA

ME

OF

PE

RS

ON

SU

BM

ITT

ING

TH

IS F

OR

MT

ITLE

' AM

E O

F IN

TI

1I

DA

TE

DA

TE

AD

DR

ES

S(n

wnb

er, s

tree

t, ci

ty. s

tate

. Z!

code

)

.....

AR

EA

CO

DE

, TE

LEP

HO

NE

NO

., E

XT

.

Page 151: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Appendix D

Statistical Tables

University-Administered Federally FundedResearch and Development Centers(Part II)

D-I. Selected employment characteristics of scientificactivities in university administered FFRDC's, Jan-uary 1971 75

D-/. Number of scientists and engineers employed inuniversity-administered Federally Funded Researchand Development Centers, by field of employment.1965, 1967. 1969, and 1971 75

D-3. Current R&D expenditures in university-adminis-tered FFRDC's by character of work, 1953-70 . . . . 76

D-4. Selected financial characteristics of scientific activ-ities in university-administered FFRDC's, 1970. . . . 76

List of Federally Funded Research andAdministered by Universities and Univ

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

Department of the Army

Army Mathematics Center (University of Wisconsin).Center for Research in Social Systems (American Uni-

versity).

Department of the Navy

Applied Physics Laboratory (Johns Hopkins University).Applied Physics Laboratory (University of Washington).Center for Naval Analyses (University of Rochester).Ordnance Research Laboratory (Pennsylvania State Uni-

versity).

Department of the Air Force

Lincoln Laboratory (Massachusetts Institute of Technolo-gy).

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION. AND WELFAREOf of Education

Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Admin-istration (University of Oregon).

Center for Research and Development in Higher Educa-tion (University of California).

Center for Research and Development for Learning andReeducation (University of Wisconsin).

Center for the Study of the Evaluation of InstructionalPrograms (University of California).

Center for the Study of Social Organization of Schoolsand the Learning Process (Johns Hopkins University).

Coordination Center for the National Program in EarlyChildhood Education (University of Illinois).

Learning Research and Development Center (Universityof Pittsburgh).

Research and Development Center in Educational Stimu-lation (University of Georgia).

Research and Development Center in Teacher Education(University of Texas).

Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teach-ing (Stanford University).

' All of the organisations listed here were designated by theFederal Council for Science and Technology to he FFRDC's inacademic year 1969.70.

73

i

ATOMIC

Au

Brt

Cat

La

Lo

Na

OaFla

Pri

Sta

NATION.TION

Jet

Sp.

NATION/

AnCe

Kit

Nat

Na

Page 152: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

ally Fundednters

'entitle*s. Jan-

. . . 75

wed inesearch

)yment.. . . . 75

dminis-76

c activ-0. . . 76

List of Federally Funded Research and Development CentersAdministered by Universities and University Consortia'

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Army Mathematics Center (University of Wisconsin).Center for Research in Social Systems (American Pni-

vcrsity).

Department of the Navy

Applied Physics Laboratory (Johns Hopkins University)..Applied Physics Laboratory (University of Washington).Center for Naval Analyses (University of Rochester).Ordnance Research Laboratory (Pennsylvania State Uni-

versity).

Department of the Air Force

Lincoln Laboratory (Massachusetts Institute of Technolo-

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION. AND WELFAREOffice of Education

Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Admin-istration (University of Oregon).

Center for Research and Development in Higher Educa-tion (University of California).

Center for Research and Development for Learning andRecducati.4. (University of Wisconsin).

Center for the Study of the Evaluation of InstructionalPrograms (University of California).

Center for the Study of Social Organization of Schoolsand the Learning Process (Johns Hopkins University).

Coordination Center for the National Program in EarlyChildhood Education (University of Illinois).

Learning Research and Development Cc (Universityof Pittsburgh).

Research and Development Center in Educational Stimu-lation (University of Georgia).

Research and Development Center in Teacher Education(University of Texas).

Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teach-ing (Stanford University).

All of the organizations listed here were designated by theFederal Council for Science and Technology to he FFRDC's inacademic year 1969.70.

73

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

Ames Laboratory (Iowa State University of Science andTechnology).

Argonne National Laboratory (University of Chicago andArgonne Universities Association).

Brookhaven National Laboratory (Associated Universi-ties, Inc.).

Cambridge Electron Accelerator (Harvard University andMassachusetts Institute of Technology).

Lawrence Radiation Laboratory. Berkeley and Livermore(University of California).

Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (University of Cali-fornia).

National. Accelerator Laboratory (Universities ResearchAssociation).

Oak Ridge Associated Universities.Plasma Physics Laboratory. (Princeton University).Princeton-Pennsylvania Accelerator (Princeton University

and University of Pennsylvania).Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (Stanford University).

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRA-TION

Jet Propulsion Laboratory (California Institute of Tech-nology).

Space Radiation Effects Laboratory (College of Williamand Mary).

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Arecibo Observatory (Cornell University).Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (Association

of Universities for Research in Astronomy, inc.).Kitt Peak National Observatory (Association of Universi-

ties for Research in Astronomy, Inc.).National Center for Atmospheric Research (University

Corporation for Atmospheric Research).National Radio Astronomy Observatory (Associated Uni-

versities. Inc.).

Page 153: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

The institutions comprising the membership ofthe managing consortia are as follows:

Associated Universities, Inc.

Columbia UniversityCornell UniversityHarvard UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPrinceton UniversityUniversity of RochesterYale University

Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, IncUniversity of CaliforniaUniversity of ChicagoHarvard UniversityIndiana UniversityUniversity of MichiganOhio State Unive-sityPrinceton UniversityUniversity of TexasUniversity of WisconsinYale University

University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

University of AlaskaUniversity of ArizonaUniversity of CaliforniaCatholic University of AmericaUniversity of ChicagoColorado State UniversityUniversity of ColoradoCornell UniversityUniversity of DenverFlorida State UniversityUniversity of HawaiiJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of MarylandMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversity of MiamiUniversity of MichiganUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of MissouriNew York UniversityUniversity of OklahomaPennsylvania State UniversitySt. Louis UniversityTexas A&M UniversityUniversity of TexafUniversity of UtahUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of Wisconsin

Oak Ridge Associated Universities

University of AlabamaUniversity of ArkansasAuburn UniversityCatholic University of AmericaClemson UniversityDuke UniversityEmory UniversityFisk UniversityUniversity of FloridaFlorida State UniversityUniversity of GeorgiaGeorgia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of KentuckyLouisiana State UniversityUniversity of LouisvilleUniversity of MarylandMedical College of VirginiaMeharry 'Medical CollegeUniversity of MiamiUniversity of MississippiMississippi State UniversityUniversity of North CarolinaNorth Carolina State UniversityNorth Texas State UniversityUniversity of OklahomaUniversity of Puerto RicoRice UniversityUniversity of South CarolinaSouthern Methodist UniversityUniversity of TennesseeUniversity of TexasTexas A&M UniversityTexas Christian UniversityTexas Women's UniversityTulane UniversityTuskegee InstituteVanderbilt UniversityUniversity of VirOniaVirginia Polytechnic InstituteWest Virginia UniversityCollege of William and Mary

University Research Association

University of ArizonaBrown UniversityCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of California - BerkeleyUniversity of California - Los AngelesUniversity of California - San DiegoCarnegie Mellon UniversityCase Western Reserve UniversityUniversity of ChicagoUniversity of ColoradoColumbia University

74

Cornell 111'

Duke UnitFlorida StHarvard I.UniversityIndiana UIowa StatUniversityJohns !lotUniversityMassachti,MichiganUniversitUniversit.UniversitNor thwecUniversitOhio StatUniversitPrincetonPurdue URice UnixUniversitRockefel'Rutgers.StanfordState UnaState UntStevens ISyracuseUniversitUniversitTulane UVanderbiUniversitWashingsUniversitUniversitYale Uni

Argoune Unive)

CarnegieCase WeIllinois IIndianaIowa StaKansas SLoyola LMarquetMichigatNorthweOhio StaPurdueSt. Louif.

Page 154: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Oak Ridge Associated Universities

University of AlabamaUniversity of ArkansasAuburn UniversityCatholic University of AmericaClemson UniversityDuke UniversityEmory UniversityFisk UniversityUniversity of FloridaFlorida State UniversityUniversity of GeorgiaGeorgia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of KentuckyLouisiana State UniversityUniversity of LouisvilleUniversity of MarylandMedical College of VirginiaMeharry Medical CollegeUniversity of MiamiUniversity of MississippiMississippi State UniversityUniversity of North CarolinaNorth Carolina State UniversityNorth Texas State UniversityUniversity of OklahomaUniversity of Puerto RicoRice UniversityUniversity of South CarolinaSouthern Methodist UniversityUniversity of TennesseeUniversity of TexasTexas A&M UniversityTexas Christian UniversityTexas Women's UniversityTulane UniversityTuskegee InstituteVanderbilt UniversityUniversity of VirginiaVirginia Polytechnic InstituteWest Virginia UniversityCollege of William and Mary

University Research Association

University of ArizonaBrown UniversityCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of California - BerkeleyUniversity of California - Los AngelesUniversity of California - San DiegoCarnegie Mellon UniversityCase Western Reserve UniversityUniversity of ChicagoUniversity of ColoradoColumbia University

74

Cornell UniversityDuke UniversityFlorida State UniversityHarvard UniversityUniversity of IllinoisIndiana UniversityIowa State UniversityUniversity of IowaJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of Maryland!Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMichigan State UniversityUniversity of MichiganUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of North Carolina Chap.' IIiiiNorthwestern UniversityUniversity of Notre DameOhio State UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaPrinceton UniversityPurdue UniversityRice UniversityUniversity of RochesterRockefeller UniversityRutgers, the State UniversityStanford UniversityState University of New York - BuffaloState University of New York - Stony kookStevens Institute of TechnologySyracuse UniversityUniversity of TexasUniversity of TorontoTulane UniversityVanderbilt UniversityUniversity of VirginiaWashington University - St. LouisUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of WisconsinYale University

Argonne Universities Association

Carnegie Mellon UniversityCase Western Reserve UniversityIllinois Institute of TechnologyIndiana UniversityIowa State UniversityKansas State UniversityLoyola UniversityMarquette UniversityMichigan State UniversityNorthwestern UniversityOhio State UniversityPurdue UniversitySt. Louis University

a-

i

I

I

a

Page 155: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

re*

University of ArizonaUniversity of ChicagoUniversity of CincinnatiUniversity of IllinoisUniversity of IowaUniversity of KansasUniversity of MichiganUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of MissouriUniversity of Notre DameUniversity of WisconsinWashington University St. LouisWayne State University

Table D1. Scientists and engineers employed in university-administered Fsponsoring Federal agency, field of employment, and function, Januai

Sponsoring Federal agency

Scientists at

Totalnumber

Field of employme

EngineersPhysical

scientistsTotal

Sponsoring Federal agency:Atomic Energy CommissionDepartment of DefenseNational Aeronautics and

Space AdministrationNational Science FoundationDepartment of Health, Education,

and Welfare

11,339 5,127 4,321

Mathemat

1,090

6,8912,140

1,696345

267

2,5401,375

1,102109

1

3,402400

332187

562274

19649

aFederally Funded Research and Development Centers.

bIncludes psychologists, social, and life scientists

Table D2. Number of scientists and engineers employed in univerFunded Research and Development Centers, by field of employment

Field of employment

Fede

Research and

1965Total

Engineers

AeronauticalChemicalCivilElectricalMechanicalOther engineers

Physical scientists

ChemistsEarth scientistsPhysicistsOther physical scientists

MathematiciansLife scientists

AgriculturalBiologicalMedical

Psychologists

Social scientists

EconomistsSociologistsPolitical scientistsHistoriansOther social scientists

11,0171967,

10,732

4,969204263180

2,1941,311

817

4,779184

285175

2,0921,331

709

4,2471,254

1522,357

484

4,3431,307

147

2,569320

952

653975450

37436180

336114

109

87

41313

(NA)57

106

79

47

20(NA)

48

75

Page 156: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Table 0.1. Scientists and engineers employed in university-administered FFRDC's,a bysponsoring Federal agency, field of employment, and function, January 1971

Sponsoring Federal agency

Scientists and engineers

Totalnumber

Field of employment

Full-timeequivalents

Total numberin research

anddevelopmentEngineers

Physicalscientists Mathematicians

Otherscientistsb

Total 11,339 5,127 4,321 1,090 801 11,166 11,151Sponsoring Federal agency:

Atomic Energy Commission 6,891 2,540 3,402 562 387 6,771 6,760Oepartment of Oefense 2,140 1,375 400 274 91 2,137 2,112National Aeronautics and

Space Administration 1,696 1,102 332 196 66 1,694 1,696National Science Foundation 345 109 187 49 342 323D.ep.rtment of Health, Education,

and Welfare 267 1 9 257 222 260

aFederally Funded Research and Development Centers.

blncludes psychologists, social, and life scientists

Table 0.2. Number of scientists and engineers employed in university-administered FederallyFunded Research and Development Centers, by field of employment, 1965, 1967, 1969, and 1971

Field of employment

Federally FundedResearch and Oevelopment Centers

January1965 1967 1969 1971

Total 11,017 10,732 11,502 11,339Engineers 4,969 4,779 5,050 5,127

Aeronautical 204 184 183 172Chemical 263 288 293 244Civil 180 1 75 142 149Electrical 2,194 2,092 2,185 2,239Mechanical 1,311 1,331 1,459 1,336Other engineers 817 709 788 987

Physical scientists 4,247 4,343 4,415 4,322Chemists 1,254 1,307 1,270 1,203Earth scientists 152 147 85 23Physicists 2,357 2,569 2,673 2,61?Other physical scientists 484 320 387 484

Mathematicians 952 975 1,091 1,090Life scientists 653 450 424 383

Agricultural 378iologtcal 436 336 333 306Medical 180 114 91 77

Psychologists 109 106 173 94Social scientists 87 79 349 . 323

Economists 4 4 45 41Sociologists 13 7 33 34Political scientists 13 20 17 13Historians (NA) (NA) 12 10Other social scientists 57 48 242 225

75

Page 157: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Table 03. Current R&D expenditures in university-administered FFROC's, by character of work, 1953.70a

[Dollars in millions)

Year Total

Basic research Applied research Development

Amount Percentof total

Amount Percentof total

Amount Percentof total

1953b $121 S 33 27.3 S 44 36.4 S 44 36.4

1954 141 39 27.7 51 36.2 51 36.2

1955b 180 49 27.2 65 36.1 66 36.7

19566 194 51 26.3 71 36.6 72 37.1

19576 . 240 65 27.1 86 35.8 89 37.1

1958 293 78 26.6 102 34.8 113 38.6

1959b 338 92 27.2 119 35.2 127 37.6

19606 360 97 26.9 122 33.9 141 39.2

1961b 410 115 28.0 135 32.9 160 39.0

1962b 470 136 28.9 155 33.0 179 38.1

1963b 530 159 30.0 170 32.1 201 37.9

1964 629 191 30.4 202 32.1 236 37.5

1965b 629 208 33.1 204 32.4 217 34.5

1966 630 227 36.0 207 32.9 196 31.1

1967b 673 250 37.1 219 32.5 204 30.3

1968 719 276 38.4 231 32.1 212 29.5

19696 725 275 37.9 210 29.0 240 33.1

1970 737 269 36.5 216 29.3 252 34.2

°See appendix D for the list of university-administered FederallyFunded Research and Development Centers surveyed in 1970

bEstimates derived from related information: no survey ook placethis year

Table D4. Selected financial characteristics of scientific activities in university-administered FFRDC's,a 1970

[Dollars in thousands)

Federal agency and geographic division

Number ofFFRDC's

Research and development expenditures

Current expendituresCapitalc

expendituresTotalbBasic

research

Appliedresearch Development

Total 35 $736,847 $268,732 5215,587 $252,528 $163,328

Sponsoring Federal agency:Atomic Energy Commission 11 465,440 195,711 159,106 110,623 138,923

Department of Defense 7 131,450 7,329 30,353 93,768 2,597

National Aeronautics andSpace Administration 2 104,238 34,350 23,398 46,490 13,782

National Science Foundation 5 26,048 26,048 7,808

Department of Health, Education,and Welfare 10 9,671 5,294 2,730 1,647 218

Geographic region:Northeast 7 140,796 57,133 29,143 54,520 24,546

North Central 6 101,971 48,750 14,152 39,069 57,145

South 10 67,412 11,384 17,315 38,713 3,220

West 12 426,668 1 51,465 154,977 120,226 78,417

°Federally Funded Research and Development Cente s.

bincludes $2.7 million in nonFederal funds.

c Includes $1.1 million in nonFederal funds.

76

I

Page 158: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

anve

low

%io

nt...

als

cum

. ora

r

AP

PE

ND

IX D

Rep

rodu

ctio

n of

Sur

vey

For

m11

10, O

b.*

vow

., ,..

.N

SF

FO

RM

412

, Nov

embe

r 19

70O

MB

No.

99-

R02

63A

ppro

val e

xpir

es D

ecem

ber

31, 1

971

NA

TIO

NA

L. S

CIE

NC

E F

OU

ND

AT

ION

Was

hing

ton,

D.C

. 205

50

SU

RV

EY

OF

SC

IEN

TIF

IC A

CT

IVIT

IES

OF

INS

TIT

UT

ION

S O

FH

IGH

ER

ED

UC

AT

ION

, 197

1

Org

aniz

atio

ns a

rc r

eque

sted

to c

ompl

ete

and

retu

rn th

is f

orm

to: N

atio

nal S

cien

ce F

ound

atio

nW

ashi

ngto

n, D

.C. 2

0550

Attn

: UN

ISG

Org

aniz

atio

nal U

nit:

(Ple

ase

corr

ect i

f ..'

me

or a

ddre

ss h

as c

hang

ed)

(Agg

rega

te d

ata

from

35

univ

ersi

ty-

adm

inis

tere

d FF

RD

C's

)

The

blu

e qu

estio

nnai

re is

to b

e us

ed to

rep

ort d

ata

for

the

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

t des

igna

ted

in th

ebo

x at

upp

er r

ight

. The

que

stio

nnai

re r

eque

sts

two

type

s of

info

rmat

ion

on th

e sc

ient

ific

act

iviti

es o

fth

e de

sign

ated

org

aniz

atio

nal u

nit:

Part

I, e

mpl

oym

ent o

f ff

rofe

ssio

nel a

nd te

chni

cal p

erso

nnel

, and

Part

II,

cur

rent

and

cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t, an

d in

stru

ctio

n.L

ist b

elow

the

nam

es o

f an

y re

sear

ch in

stitu

tes,

labo

rato

ries

, bur

eaus

, hos

pita

ls, o

r fo

unda

tions

incl

uded

in th

e or

-ga

niza

tiona

l uni

t cov

ered

in th

is r

epor

t:

Page 159: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Org

aniz

atio

ns a

rc r

eque

sted

to c

ompl

ete

and

retu

rn th

is f

orm

to:

Nat

iona

l Sci

ence

Fou

ndat

ion

Was

hing

ton,

D.C

. 205

50A

ttn: U

NIS

G

Org

aniz

atio

nal U

nit:

(Ple

ase

corr

ect i

f na

me

or a

ddre

ss h

as c

hang

ed)

(Aggregate data from 35 university-

administered FFRDC's)

The

blu

e qu

estio

nnai

re is

to b

e us

ed to

rep

ort d

ata

for

the

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

t des

igna

ted

in th

ebo

x at

upp

er r

ight

. The

que

stio

nnai

re r

eque

sts

two

type

s of

info

rmat

ion

on th

e sc

ient

ific

act

iviti

es o

fth

e de

sign

ated

org

aniz

atio

nal u

nit:

Part

I, e

mpl

oym

ent o

f pr

ofes

sion

al a

nd te

chni

cal p

erso

nnel

, and

Part

II,

cur

rent

and

cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t, an

d in

stru

ctio

n.L

ist b

elow

the

nam

es o

f an

y re

sear

ch in

stitu

tes,

labo

rato

ries

, bur

eaus

, hos

pita

ls, o

r fo

unda

tions

incl

uded

in th

e or

-ga

niza

tiona

l uni

t cov

ered

in th

is r

epor

t:

Plea

se r

ead

the

encl

osed

inst

ruct

ions

bef

ore

com

plet

ing

this

for

m. W

here

exa

ct d

ata

are

not a

vail-

able

, est

imat

es a

re a

ccep

tabl

e. E

nter

"0

" as

a to

tal r

athe

r th

an le

ave

an it

em b

lank

.

The

dat

a re

ques

ted

in th

is q

uest

ionn

aire

will

be

publ

ishe

d as

sta

tistic

al to

tals

or

aggr

egat

es f

or a

llin

stitu

tions

or

for

sele

cted

gro

ups

of in

stitu

tions

.In

cer

tain

inst

ance

s, h

owev

er, t

he N

atio

nal S

cien

ceFo

unda

tion

may

wis

h to

pub

lish

sele

cted

sur

vey

data

with

the

inst

itutio

n id

entif

ied.

Plea

se in

dica

tebe

low

the

num

ber

of a

ny it

em th

at s

houl

d no

t be

publ

ishe

d w

ith in

stitu

tiona

l ide

ntif

icat

ion:

wa,

epar

a..,.

.. .

rw,w

.r/u

-..0

.*-

...,v

W.

A

Page 160: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

PA

RT

IPE

RS

ON

NE

L D

AT

A(I

nclu

des

item

s 1

to 6

of

the

surv

ey q

uest

ionn

aire

)Pe

rson

nel d

ata

are

to b

e re

port

ed a

s of

Jan

uary

197

1 or

as

clos

e as

pos

sibl

e th

eret

o.

SE

CT

ION

A. N

UM

BE

R O

F S

CIE

NT

IST

S A

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RS

.111

(NO

TE

: Fig

ures

on

grad

uate

stu

dent

s en

gage

d pa

rt ti

me

as s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs s

houl

d be

rep

orte

d in

Sec

tion

B).

Item 1.

00

Ful

l-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

y fie

ld a

nd fu

nctio

n in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyed

; and

tota

l ful

l-tim

e eq

uiva

lent

s, b

yfu

nctio

n, J

anua

ry 1

971

FIE

LD

OF

EM

PLO

YM

EN

TT

OT

AL

°(1

)

a. E

ngin

eers

(to

tal)

(1)

Aer

onau

tical

eng

inee

rs

(2)

Che

mic

al e

ngin

eers

(3)

Civ

il en

gine

ers

......

..

.

(4)

Ele

ctri

cal e

ngin

eers

(5)M

echa

nica

l eng

inee

rs

(6)

Oth

er e

ngin

eers

0110

5,09

301

1117

201

1224

201

1314

901

142,

226

0115

0116

979

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

0120

4,18

1(1

) C

hem

ists

0121

1,16

3(2

) E

arth

sci

entis

ts01

2222

(3)

Phys

icis

ts01

232,

524

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

. ..

..

0124

472

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)01

301,

059

d. L

ife

scie

ntis

ts (

tota

l)01

4035

9(1

) A

gric

ultu

ral s

cien

tists

0141

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

0142

287

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts01

4372

e. P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

0150

57f.

Soci

al s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

0160

26(1

) E

cono

mis

ts01

6139

(2)

Soci

olog

ists

0162

24(3

)Pol

itica

l sci

entis

ts01

6313

(4)

His

tori

ans

0164

9(5

) O

ther

soc

ial s

cien

tists

0165

184

g. T

otal

(su

m o

f a

toI)

0100

n01

8h.

FT

E d

istr

ibut

ion,

by

func

tion

0190

11,0

18

TE

AC

HIN

GR

& D

(2)

(3)

OT

HE

RA

CT

IVIT

IES

(4)

5,00

192

171

123

57

145

42

201

21,

308

194

138

41,

135

2822

2,50

12

449

21,

052

735

2

280 72 55

226

81

-39 23

113 9

184

10 8

1810

,831

187

Ful

l-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

y fie

ld in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyed

and

hig

hest

ear

ned

degr

ee, J

anua

ry 1

971

IP

H.D

.M

.D.,

BA

CH

EL

OR

'Sa

OR

D.D

.S..

AS

R'S

OR

TH

E

Page 161: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

--77

1Acr

onat

(2)

Che

mic

al e

ngin

eers

(3)

Civ

il en

gine

ers

(4)

Ele

ctri

cal e

ngin

eers

(5)

Mec

hani

cal e

ngin

eers

(6)

Oth

er e

ngin

eers

114

171

1.

0112

21+

223

57

0113

149

-14

5_2

201

401

142,

226

2501

151,

325

1308 94

117

0116

979

-38

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

. .

..

.

(1)

Che

mis

ts

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)

Phy

sici

sts

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

..

.

0120

4 18

1-

4,10

774

0121

1,16

31,

135

2801

2222

2201

232,

521+

2,50

144

923 23

0124

1172

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)'0

130

1, 0

591,

052

7d.

Lif

e sc

ient

ists

(to

tal)

(1)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

0140

359

-35

27_

_.01

41

0142

287

280

0143

7272

e. P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

0150

57-

55f.

Soci

al s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soci

olog

ists

(3)P

oliti

cal s

cien

tists

(4)

His

tori

ans

(5)O

ther

soc

ial s

cien

tists

0160

269

268

0161

39-

3901

6224

2301

6313

- -13

0164

99

0165

184

-18

4g.

Tot

al (

sum

Oa

to J

)01

0011

018

-10

,835

10, 8

3118

1_18

7h.

FT

E d

istr

ibut

ion,

by

func

tion

..

0190

11, 0

18-

It 2.F

ull-t

ime

scie

ntis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

, by

field

'n w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed a

nd h

ighe

st e

arne

d de

gree

, Jan

uary

197

1

FIE

LD

OF

EM

PLO

YM

EN

TT

OT

AL

'(1

)

PH.D

.O

RSC

.D.

(2)

M.D

.,D

.D.S

.,E

TC

.(3

).

MA

STE

R'S

(4)

BA

CH

EL

OR

'SO

R T

HE

EQ

UIV

AL

EN

T(S

)

a.E

ngin

eers

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

c. M

athe

mat

icia

nsd.

Lif

e sc

ient

ists

e. P

sych

olcg

ists

f.So

cial

sci

entis

tsg.

Tot

al (

sum

of

a to

n

0210

5,09

360

3-

1,60

22,

892

0220

1i.,

181

,2

569

167

194

002

301,

059

139_

160

14

341 62

578 cL

I_az

_7.

7__

4,59

3

0240

359

0250

51_

269

15__

7.6

3,58

2

.- 2 47

io 314

2,80

002

6 0

0200

11,0

18'T

otal

s in

item

s la

to lg

, col

umn

1, s

houl

d be

the

sam

e as

the

corr

espo

ndin

g to

tals

in it

ems

2a to

2g,

col

umn

1.bT

he to

tal r

epor

ted

in it

em lh

, col

umn

1, s

houl

d, b

y de

fini

tion,

be

the

sam

e as

the

tota

l in

item

lg, c

olum

n 1.

How

ever

, the

FT

Edi

stri

bu-

tion

by f

unct

ion

(col

umns

2, 3

, and

4)

will

not

nec

essa

rily

coi

ncid

e w

ith th

e fu

nctio

nal d

istr

ibut

ion

on a

"pr

imar

ily e

mpl

oyed

" ba

sis

in it

em 1

g.

Page 162: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Item 3..

Item

4.

ay...

......

......

.ww

oneo

rrow

oar

e....

......

......

......

.. .,

.... =

vmm

enw

tow

rw

anos

.7,

Par

t-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

y fie

ld a

nd fu

nctio

n in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyed

; and

tota

l ful

ltim

e eq

uiva

lent

s,'

byfu

nctio

n, J

anua

ry 1

971.

(E

xclu

de g

radu

ate

stud

ents

her

e bu

t rep

ort t

heni

in S

ectio

n B

)

FIE

LD O

F E

MP

LOY

ME

NT

TO

TA

(I)

TE

AC

HIN

G(2

)R

&D

(3)

OT

HE

RA

CT

IVIT

IES

(4)

ngin

cers

(to

tal)

(I)

Aer

onau

tical

eng

inee

rs

(2)

Che

mic

al e

ngin

eers

(3)

Civ

il en

gine

ers

(4) E

lect

rica

l eng

inee

rs

(5)

Mec

hani

cal e

ngin

eers

(6)

Oth

er e

ngin

eers

0310

3433

0312

0313

0313

0314

0315

0316

2

.111

.1=

11.7

11..2

7

2

13 11 8

13 11

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Che

mis

ts

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)

Phys

icis

ts

(4)O

ther

phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts

0320

141

032

1.\-

-

0322

103

23

0324

88

714

14o

188 12

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)03

3031

31d.

Lif

e sc

ient

ists

(to

tal)

0340

211

(1)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts ..

... .

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

0342

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

tsr0

343

5

211

19

e.Ps

ycho

logi

sts

(tot

al)

0350

37f.

Soci

al s

cien

tists

(to

tzl)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soci

olog

ists

(3)

Polit

ical

sci

entis

ts

(4)

His

toria

ns

(5)

Oth

er s

ocia

l sci

entis

ts

0360

54 203

6210

-_

103

63

0364

0365

g. T

otal

(sum

of a

to fj

h.E

TE

dis

trib

utio

n, b

y fu

nctio

n. ,

0300

0390

5 36 513

2-

2 1

1

321

148

orsr

was

w.r

.bra

.22

316

5

144

In../

M11

,11.

11.0

11M

ON

IMM

INE

M N

IAJ

Par

t-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

y fie

ld in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyed

and

hig

hest

ear

ned

degr

ee, J

anua

ry 1

971.

1 4

TO

TA

Page 163: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

0

(5)

Mec

hani

cal e

ngtn

eers

(6)

Oth

er e

ngin

eers

0313

0 i6

'11

111

87

i1

I

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(I)C

hem

ists

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)

Phy

sici

sts

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

0320

6721

_14

147

5

13.

43.

1__

,

40 103

221

0323

Olg

---

88 iy-

88 12-

C. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)03

3031

-

1

31 211

1

d. L

ife s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(I)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts...

.. ..

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cicn

tists

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts,

0340

2403

41_

19 5

0342

0343

19 5_

_e.

Psy

chol

ogis

ts (

tota

l)03

5037

-36

.1.

1.S

ocia

l sci

entis

ts (

tota

l)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soc

iolo

gist

s

(3)

Pol

itica

l sci

cntis

ts

(4)

His

toria

ns

(5)

Oth

er s

ocia

l sci

entis

ts

0360

54,

-51

I3

i03

612

203

6210

1-

9I

1I

0363

17

11

0364

0365

11

1

' -1-

1--

13.

2_2

g. T

otal

(su

m o

f a to

I)03

0032

131

61

5h.

1T

E d

istr

ibut

ion,

by

func

tionb

..

0390

148

144

LIIF

Item

4.P

art-

time

scie

ntis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

, by

field

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

edan

d hi

ghes

t ear

ned

degr

ee. J

anua

ry19

71.

FIF

LI)

OF

EM

PLO

YM

EN

TT

OT

AL"

(I)

PH

.D.

OR

SC

.D.

(2)

M.D

.,D

.D.S

.,E

TC

.(3

)

MA

ST

ER

'S(4

)

BA

CH

ELO

R'S

OR

TH

EE

QU

IVA

LEN

T(5

)a.

Eng

inee

rs

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

..

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns

d. L

ife s

cicn

tists

e. P

sych

olog

ists

f.S

ocia

l sci

entis

ts

0410

311.

417

1304

201

141

9213

3504

3031

78

1604

4024

115

45

0450

3727 25

9 151

0460

541

/3g.

Tot

al (

sum

of a

ro

J).

. .6.-

---

0400

321

166.

666

83nf

ot.d

s in

item

s 3a

to 3

g, c

olum

n, s

houl

d be

the

som

e as

the

corr

espo

ndin

g to

t.ds

'n h

ems

4a to

4g,

c lu

men

I.bi

le to

tals

in it

em 3

It co

nver

ting

figt.r

eson

par

t-tim

e em

ploy

men

t int

o F

TE

's w

ill n

eces

saril

y di

ffer

from

hea

d-co

unt t

otal

sin

item

3g.

Page 164: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

4

....C

11+

SE

CT

ION

B. N

UM

BE

R O

F G

RA

DU

AT

E S

TU

DE

NT

S E

NG

AG

ED

PA

RT

TIM

E A

S S

CIE

NT

IST

SA

ND

EN

GIN

EE

RS

Item

I5.

Gra

duat

e st

uden

ts r

ecei

ving

com

pens

atio

nan

d fu

nctio

n in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

ngag

ed;

for

part

-tim

e se

rvic

es a

s sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs a

t you

r in

stitu

tion,

by

field

and

tota

l FT

E's

, by

func

tion,

Jan

uary

197

1.

FIE

LD O

F E

MP

LOY

ME

NT

TO

TA

L(1

)T

EA

CH

ING

(2)

R &

D(3

)

OT

HE

RA

CT

IVIT

IES

(4)

a.E

ngin

eers

(to

tal)

(1)

Aer

onau

tical

eng

inee

rs

(2)

Che

mic

al e

ngin

eers

(3)

Civ

il en

gine

ers

(4)

Ele

ctric

alen

gine

ers

(5)

Mec

hani

cal e

ngin

eers

(6)O

ther

eng

inee

rs

0510

8785

0511

505

12

0513

_

0514

2020

-05

15_

0516

4645

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Che

mis

ts

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)

Phys

icis

ts

(4)O

ther

phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts .

. .

0520

9694

2

183

182

105

223

_3

0521

197

197

-05

2411

3-

112

1

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)05

3036

36d.

Lif

e sc

ient

ists

(to

tal)

(1)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

0540

31r

3105

41_

__

_

0542

3131

0543

__

_

e. P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

0550

44_

44f.

Soci

al s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soci

olog

ists

(3)

Polit

ical

sci

entis

ts

(4)H

isto

rian

s

(S)

Oth

er s

ocia

l scl

eatis

ts

0560

128

128

-05

615

L II-

_

0562

II-

0563

44

0564

_

0565

115

-11

5g.

Tot

al(s

uns

°fa

to I)

0500

822

-81

8h.

FT

E d

istr

ibut

ion,

by

func

tion

. .59

046

o_

458

The

tota

ls in

item

Sh

conv

ertin

g fi

gure

s on

par

t-tim

e se

rvic

es in

toF

TE

'sw

iE n

eces

sari

ly d

iffe

r fr

om h

ead-

coun

t tot

als

in it

em S

g.

SE

CT

ION

C. N

UM

BE

R O

F T

EC

HN

ICIA

NS

EM

PLO

YE

D IN

TH

E S

CIE

NC

ES

AN

D E

NG

INE

ER

ING

Item

6.

..T

echn

icia

ns, b

y fie

ld a

nd fu

nctio

n In

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyes

!, Ja

nuar

y 19

71 ,

Page 165: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

00 0

a )

her

engi

neer

s

b. P

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Che

mis

ts

(2)

Ear

th s

cien

tists

(3)

Phy

sici

sts

(4)

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

.

0520

0521

0522

494

183

182

33

0523

197

197

0524

113

c. M

athe

mat

icia

ns (

tota

l)05

30

112

3636

d. L

ife s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts

(2)

Bio

logi

cal s

cien

tists

(3)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts

0540

3131

0541

0542

3131

0543

e.P

sych

olog

ists

(to

tal)

0550

441.

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

(to

tal)

(1)

Eco

nom

ists

(2)

Soc

iolo

gist

s

(3)

Pol

itica

l sci

entis

ts

(4)

His

toria

ns

(5)

Oth

er s

ocia

l sci

entis

ts

g. T

otal

(su

m o

f to

1)

0560

128

128

0561

505

62

0563

0564

h. K

ti. d

istr

ibut

ion,

by

func

tion

.

0115

5

0500

0590

115

115

822

818

6o45

82

The

tota

ls in

item

gh

conv

ertin

g fig

ures

on

part

-tim

e se

rvic

es in

to F

TE

's w

ill n

eces

saril

y di

ffer

from

hea

d-co

unt t

otal

s in

item

5g.

SE

CT

ION

C. N

UM

BE

R O

F T

EC

HN

ICIA

NS

EM

PLO

YE

D IN

TH

E S

CIE

NC

ES

AN

D E

NG

INE

ER

ING

horn s.

Tec

hnic

ians

, by

field

and

func

tion

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed, J

anua

ry 1

971

FIE

LD O

F E

MP

LOY

ME

NT

TO

TA

L(1

)R

&D

(2)

OT

HE

RA

CT

IVIT

IES

(3)

a. E

ngin

eerin

g te

chni

cian

s

b. P

hysi

cal.s

cien

ce te

chni

cian

s

c.B

iolo

gica

l sci

ence

tech

nici

ans

(incl

ude

agric

ultu

ral)

il. M

edic

al a

nd h

ealth

rela

ted

tech

nici

ans

r. S

ocia

l sci

ence

tech

nici

ans

4/11

1111

1101

11I

1.T

otal

(su

m o

f a to

ci

TA

SIM

IXIS

I ittr

aOS

CA

PA

CLX

V,

0610

6,23

25,

836

396

0620

0630

0640

1 41

7

273

280

1, 3

3285

272

1

280

0650

3636

rwee

rria

1111

.11T

MM

IYO

NIM

M4

ter-

nmen

ram

mer

etre

alm

esem

arel

eam

mer

awar

rree

eem

ei

0600

8 )2

31.1

7,75

648

2sM

1111

111M

Page 166: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

PA

RT

II-F

INA

NC

IAL

DA

TA

(Inc

lude

s ite

ms

7 to

13

of th

e su

rvey

que

stio

nnai

re)

FIN

AN

CIA

L D

AT

A R

EPO

RT

ED

IN

PA

RT

II

AR

EFO

RT

HE

FIS

CA

L Y

EA

R, W

HIC

H B

EG

AN

ON

JU

LY

1, 1

969

AN

DE

ND

ED

ON

JU

NE

30,

197

0, O

R Y

OU

R I

NST

ITU

TIO

N'S

EQ

UIV

AL

EN

T F

ISC

AL

YE

AR

, SPE

CIF

Y T

HE

EN

DIN

GD

AT

E I

F D

IFFE

RE

NT

FR

OM

AB

OV

E:

AL

L F

INA

NC

IAL

DA

TA

RE

QU

EST

ED

ON

'TH

ISFO

RM

SHO

UL

D B

E R

EPO

RT

ED

IN

TH

OU

SAN

DS

OF

DO

LL

AR

S;FO

R E

XA

MPL

E, A

N E

XPE

ND

ITU

RE

OF

$25,

342

SHO

UL

DB

E R

OU

ND

ED

TO

TH

E N

EA

RE

ST T

HO

USA

ND

DO

LL

AR

SA

ND

RE

POR

TE

D I

N T

HE

APP

RO

PRIA

TE

CO

LU

MN

S A

S$2

5.

Page 167: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

SECTION D

CURRENT EXPENDITURES FOR SEPARATELY BUDGETED RESEARCHAND DEVELOPMENT (R&D)

If y

our

inst

itutio

n di

d no

t hav

e an

y cu

rren

t exp

endi

ture

s fo

r se

para

tely

bud

gete

d re

sear

chan

d de

velo

pmen

t in

1969

.70

chec

k

"non

e" in

the

spac

e pr

ovid

ed h

ere

and

skip

to S

ectio

n E

.N

one.

(Exc

lude

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r ca

pita

l equ

ipm

ent a

nd fa

cilit

ies.

)

Item

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r se

para

tely

bud

gete

d re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent,

by s

ourc

e of

fund

s, 1

969-

70

7.

Stat

e go

vern

men

t

Loc

al g

over

nmen

t

Foun

datio

ns

Vol

unta

ry h

ealth

age

ncie

s

Indu

stry

Inst

itutio

n's

own

fund

s

Oth

er s

ourc

es

Tot

al a

nd fe

dera

lly fi

nanc

ed c

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

lybu

dget

ed r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent,

by m

ajor

cos

t

item

, 196

9.70

.

a.D

irec

t wag

es a

nd s

alar

ies

b. A

ll ot

her

dire

ct c

osts

(in

clud

ing

mat

eria

ls a

nd s

uppl

ies)

c.in

dire

ct c

osts

reim

burs

edor

rei

m-

burs

able

0810

$35

0,64

0

0820

269,

332

0830

116,

875

0800

--IS

736,

847

$34

9,44

3

268,

829

115,

859

734,

131

Tot

al a

nd fe

dera

lly fi

nanc

ed c

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

lybu

dget

ed r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent,

by ty

pe o

f R&

D

activ

ity, 1

969-

70.

Page 168: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

a.Fe

dera

l Gov

ernm

ent

b.S

tate

gov

ernm

ent

c. L

ocal

gov

ernm

ent

d. F

ound

atio

ns

e.V

olun

tary

hea

lthag

enci

es

1%In

dust

ryg.

Inst

itutio

n's

own

fund

s

h. O

ther

sou

rces

0710

734,131

equa

ls 8

d an

d 9d

(C

ol. 2

)

0720

310

0730

0740

281

0750

107

6012

107

701,

706

0780

297

i.T

otal

(su

mof

a to

h)a

0700

S73

6, 8

47eq

uals

8d

and

9d (

Col

. 1)

Item

8.

Tot

al a

nd fe

dera

lly fi

nanc

ed c

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

rese

arch

and

deve

lopm

ent,

by m

ajor

cos

t

item

, 196

9-70

.

CO

ST I

TE

M

TH

OU

SAN

DS

OF

DO

LL

AR

S

TO

TA

L(1

)FE

DE

RA

L G

OV

ER

NM

EN

T(2

)

a. D

irec

t wag

es a

nd s

alar

ies

b. A

ll ot

her

dire

ct c

osts

(inc

ludi

ngm

ater

ials

and

sup

plie

s)

c.In

dire

ct c

osts

rei

mbu

rsed

or

reim

burs

able

081

0S

350,

611

-0S

349,443

0820

269,

332

'

268,

829

0830

116,

875

115,

859

d. T

otal

(su

m o

f a

to c

fa08

00$

W

736,847

$734,131

Item

9.

Tot

al a

nd fe

dera

lly fi

nanc

ed c

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

rese

arch

and

dev

elop

men

t, by

type

of R

&D

activ

ity,

1969

.70.

TY

PE

OF

R&

D A

CT

IVIT

Y

TH

OU

SA

ND

S O

F D

OLL

AR

S

TO

TA

L(1

)FE

DE

RA

L G

OV

ER

NM

EN

T(2

)

a. B

asic

res

earc

h

b. A

pplie

d re

sear

ch

c.D

evel

opm

ent

0910

268,

732

267,084

0920

215,

587

214,

925

0930

252,

528

252,

122

d. T

otal

(sum

of

a to

C)0

0900

s736,847

734,131

&T

otal

sin

item

s 71

.8d

(Col

. 1)

and

9d (

Col

. 1)

shou

ld b

e id

entic

al.

Sim

ilarly

, fig

ures

rep

orte

d in

item

s 7a

, 8d

(Col

. 2)

and

9d (

Col

. 2)

shou

ldbe

iden

tical

. If

figu

res

for

the

fore

goin

g ite

ms

are

not c

onsi

sten

t, pl

ease

giv

e re

ason

s in

"R

emar

ks"

at th

een

d of

the

ques

tionn

aire

.

Page 169: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Hei

n10

.

4.1:

111r

VO

Irlii

.111

1111

1111

1111

1111

1111

110/

01W

INN

IZT

AI7

IIII

IIII

1101

/111

/WIT

:WW

W/2

1110

3111

1161

GT

V=

1/7/

IL

CZ

S42:

7:11

CII

MPX

1191

near

rr-.

.4

Tot

al a

nd f

eder

ally

fin

ance

d cu

rren

t exp

endi

ture

s fo

r se

para

tely

budg

eted

bas

ic a

nd a

pplie

d re

sear

cn,

by fi

eld

ofsc

ienc

e, 1

969.

70

FIE

LD

OF

SCIE

NC

E

TH

OU

SAN

DS

OF

DO

LL

AR

S

TO

TA

L(1

)FE

DE

RA

L G

OV

ER

NM

EN

T(2

)1.

......

......

..

a. E

ngin

eeri

ng (

tota

l)10

10S

65,8

52S

65,7

02b

Phys

ical

sci

ence

s (t

otal

)10

20

1021

S33

7 ,60

715

,, 58

11-

3371

1/4-

3(1

) A

stro

nom

y

(2)

Che

mis

try

(3)

Phys

ics

(4)

Phys

ical

sci

ence

s, N

EC

15, 5

86;

1022

5 6,

162

5 6,

15

710

2325

0L37

325

0 , 2

111-

15,1

188

18, 0

99_

s15

Ibr

o

1024

15 ,4

88S

1O

r ...

.71:

c.E

nvir

onm

enta

l sci

ence

s (t

otal

)10

30

d. M

athe

mat

ics

(tot

al)

1040

$15

, 7.3

e.L

ife

scie

nces

(to

tal)

_105

010

51

1052

,S2L

/4 -

5922

536

2_74

.304

.

21,5

26r.

(1)

Bio

logi

cal

(2)

Clin

ical

med

ical

.(3)

Lif

e sc

ienc

es, N

EC

---:

:.5

,426

5,28

1.

407

1053

1060

1061

_21;

27rM

OV

IN$

9_16

SIN

IMM

VIN

IMIO

NIM

OS

IMM

Y,

f.Ps

ycho

logy

(to

tal)

_956

g(1

) B

iolo

gica

l asp

ects

(2)

Soci

al a

spec

ts

(3)

Psyc

holo

gica

l sci

ence

s, N

EC

__...

..

--

!10

6237

535

5e

1063

601

601

il...

......

....,

g. S

ocia

l sci

ence

s (t

otal

).,

(1)

Eco

nom

ics

(2)

Polit

ical

sci

ence

(3)

Soci

olog

y

(4)

Soci

al s

cien

ces,

NE

C

1070

1071

$5,

059 20

g2258 20

1072

220

201

f!10

7310

291

1074

4 71

701

1Ch.

Oth

er s

cien

ce.:,

NE

C (

tota

l)10

30S

13 1

1'72

d$

1119

7.:

rayi

lmar

nam

eaPe

.rew

amra

m,..

......

...=

a1.

i.T

otal

(sum

of a

loh)

A.,.

......

......

.-,..

......

......

......

.:,...

....;

1000

$48

4-, 3

19..:

.,..<

: r 't

,211

.,421

132,

417L

.7,0

4.0e

r,,I

ftat

.,-17

61:1

1273

1Tie

nr,r

7.11

41It

a.-1

,,,S

lo.

482.

009 ..

,sr

c +

AV

M: 1

irM

11.0

15e.

If y

our

inst

itutio

n ha

s de

velo

pmen

t fun

ds p

leas

e do

701

di:A

ribu

te th

em b

y fi

eld

of s

cien

ce. T

otal

s in

10i

(co

lum

ns1

and

2)sh

ould

be

iden

tical

with

the

sum

of

lines

On

and

Ohl

(col

umns

1 a

nd 2

).

./Mai

ll111

1111

11M

OIM

IIIM

MIW

INC

OM

OZ

AZ

ICZ

AL

' `70

1011

10.2

1111

1=1:

11M

USI

SXQ

SWII

MIS

TIC

WW

0,4

11/./

./4/

,./11

.11M

C.=

4/N

2/00

1=tr

seZ

137/

4.1.

111I

IMIC

T/M

KO

NIt

ieln

/Wal

flO

nitZ

/V2.

7,14

Xr.

11.r

/MC

UM

IFIE

VII

IIV

IV=

.7"/

CU

RR

EN

T E

XP

EN

DIT

UR

ES

FO

R IN

ST

RU

CT

ION

AN

D D

ITA

PTM

EN

TA

I. R

E:I

:AR

CH

IN

TH

ESC

IEN

CE

S A

ND

EN

CII

I.E

ER

INC

Isi

ww

wsw

easa

wav

irsc

raro

sarc

aman

ossw

rom

xvia

rsow

anct

omr:

mar

war

awau

ez r

r:n3

Z/V

A/L

T4n

,alli

fraf

tV11

.3I/

4.11

/6 Z

WV

.L.2

:166

0/1:

1111

11`.

1/11

7:41

.rX

.1.1

1/SM

INO

WD

RA

qt:-

.1.-

ttraW

S7,/,

if,"

Item

Cur

rent

expe

nditu

res

for

inst

ruct

ion

and

depa

rtm

enta

lre

sear

ch in

the

scie

nce.

; and

enc

jir,e

king

, by

11.

field

of s

cien

ce, 1

909.

70

SEC

T/O

N E

lanw

rano

w

a.E

ngin

eeri

ng11

10b.

Phys

ical

and

env

iron

men

tal s

cien

ces_

_11

20c.

Mat

hem

atic

s1

?I)

FIE

LD

OF

SCIE

NC

EIM

aIrM

iell1

.111

10

TO

TA

L I

NST

RU

CT

ION

AN

DD

EPA

RT

ME

NT

AL

RE

SEA

RC

H(T

HO

USA

ND

S O

F D

OL

LA

RS)

INT

ER

NA

LU

SE O

NL

Ykk

Page 170: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

c....

c.E

nvir

onm

enta

l sci

ence

s (t

otal

)10

3017

7131

18,0

99...

.--,

mke

m...

......

......

..0...

d. M

athe

mat

ics

(tot

al)

1040

$15

763

15,1

40e.

Lif

e sc

ienc

es (

tota

l)10

502l

i459

s22

4=30

(1)

Bio

logi

cal

1051

21 5

36

2121

2-6

(2)

Clin

ical

med

ical

_10

525,

426

5, 2

81(3

) L

ife

scie

nces

, NE

C10

53,..

......

,49

L4:

1$

910_

____

f.Ps

ycho

logy

(to

tal)

1060

(1)

Bio

logi

cal a

spec

ts10

61

(2)

Soci

al a

spec

ts

(3)

Psyc

holo

gica

l sci

ence

s, N

EC

__...

_10

68

1062

875

.....-

---

601

603.

g.So

cial

sci

ence

s (t

otal

)10

70_.

.$5,

059

.q

425

(1)

Eco

nom

ics

1071

2020

oo(2

) Po

litic

al s

cien

ce10

7222

020

1i

t.,..)

II(3

) So

ciol

ogy

1073

102

91(.

1) S

ocia

l sci

ence

s, N

EC

1074

4 71

7, 9

46...

rm. n

may

......

...1.

,.....

rwro

rstr

omde

amos

Am

nr, .

1e:

$13

2172

.$

33 1

07a

-i.

Tot

al (

sum

of

a lo

h)

1000

'14

84, 3

1948

2.00

9t

,AC

LIL

Tai

lar.

......

.aal

.:MIA

lmei

=1~

4.1=

10,-

74/tA

luta

aies

ialig

la=

0114

21C

.1:.t

..-0.

C 4

: WW

I ya

rtuf

,..1.

,:t."

-72

r..7

,.4..r

sicl

af.:4

1.04

77"T

r4.

z.:.y

.W.0

11ea

-VA

v 7.

1146

=--

m-A

r.4.

1.7,

olic

ts,..

4, t.

.48

2.00

9 --, o

x .,.

gioc

age:

g...

,...

If y

our

inst

itutio

n ha

s de

velo

pmen

t fun

ds p

leas

e do

7 of

dis

trib

ute

them

by

fiel

d of

sci

ence

. Tot

als

in 1

0i (

colu

mns

1 a

rid

2)i

shou

ld b

e id

entic

al w

ith th

e su

m o

f lin

es 9

a an

d 91

) (c

olum

ns 1

and

2).

Sill

ir.M

WO

MM

ILII

MSS

atiN

t IN

ININ

ICA

IRT

IMIN

IMM

IMIS

OM

MIC

RIS

.710

1111

1111

1111

.111

1MY

VIV

C:..

.. 10

,4t1

4,M

=II

Alt

7;01

7=12

74,1

13.C

AM

IZZ

ITIM

AK

a~W

isR

2111

40fu

rcs-

a-!-

..-IT

Tki

nvno

serp

ileas

ec."

1

CU

RR

EN

T E

XP

EN

DIT

UR

ES

FO

R IN

ST

RU

CT

ION

AN

D D

EPA

RT

ME

NT

AL

RE

r.E

AR

CH

IN

TH

E S

CIE

NC

ES

AN

() E

NC

AN

EE

RIN

Ci.r

.; LI

StIr

Can

tlefd

/J41

11,4

11A

CIS

CIV

AIN

EM

Atia

lintia

lv.V

IDO

L14

0 V

ITA

IIII

IIII

MA

.w. /

. 01

i ig1

4t".

7..Z

IKL

Car

tair

. %V

0-

Z.T

AM

CZ

INW

Illr

al tJ

ullW

r-A

1743

.16M

ilate

n.C

.irit

Z.:

Tto

wA

r.1%

T.I

PAN

ZIn

T.,:

,,,It

omC

urre

ntex

pend

iture

s fo

r in

stru

ctio

n an

d de

part

men

tal

rese

arch

in th

e sc

ienc

es a

nd e

ngin

..eei

ngby

11.

field

of s

cien

ce, 1

9694

0

355

PIN

I.1.

140

41...

...M

.111

1011

1....

..1.1

.0.P

IMM

ION

10..,

h. C

glie

r sc

ienc

es, l

aC (

tota

l)10

30

SE

CT

ION

E

FIE

LD

OF

SCIE

NC

ET

OT

AL

IN

STR

UC

TIO

N A

ND

rno,

A R

TM

NN

TA

I. I

t ESE

A U

CH

( T

HO

USA

ND

S O

F D

OL

LA

RS

)

a. E

ngin

eeri

ngb.

Phy

sica

l and

env

iron

men

tal s

cien

ces_

_

c.A

1ath

emat

ics

d. L

ite s

cien

ces

e. P

sych

olog

yf.

Soci

al s

cien

ces

g.O

ther

sci

ence

s,N

E,C

1110

1120

1130

1140

1150

1160

INT

ER

NA

LU

SE O

NL

Y

.-ez

toct

owsu

mio

ssom

j

h. T

otal

(su

m o

f a

to g

)11

00$

s-su

w.s

srst

,ess

osav

irso

lsas

sass

usge

ss.

Est

imat

e th

e do

llar

amou

nt o

f ove

rhea

dor

indi

rect

cos

ts a

lloca

ble

to th

e in

-st

ruct

ion

and

depa

rtm

enta

l res

earc

h ac

tiviti

es r

epel

led

abov

e (it

em 1

1)12

00

1170

TH

OU

SA

ND

S O

F D

OLL

AR

S

$

12..

04. a

leui

bila

17Ja

rMi7

sl7K

WIC

11.=

tist

rri

.cre

aria

ncor

lium

r.a

.cim

war

.wen

wee

kert

.:7

4(T

AI.

iret

robr

al41

1111

11/1

,011

1.0

Page 171: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

SE

CT

ION

FC

AP

ITA

L E

XP

EN

DIT

UR

ES

FO

R S

CIE

NT

IFIC

AN

DE

NG

INE

ER

ING

FA

CIL

ITIE

S A

ND

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

FO

R R

ES

EA

RC

H, D

EV

ELO

PM

EN

T, A

ND

INS

TR

UC

TIO

N

Item 13

.

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

scie

ntifi

c an

d en

gine

erin

g fa

cilit

ies

and

equi

pmen

t for

res

earc

h, d

evel

opm

ent,

and

inst

ruct

ion,

by fi

eld

of s

cien

ce, s

ourc

e of

fund

s, a

nd p

urpo

se,1

969-

70.

1

Pror

ate

any

expe

nditu

res

inte

nded

for

use

in tw

o or

mor

e fi

elds

of s

cien

ce a

nd f

or R

&D

and

gra

duat

e an

d un

derg

radu

ate

inst

ruct

ion.

Do

not i

nclu

de a

ny m

ater

ials

and

sup

plie

s re

port

ed u

nder

curr

ent e

xpen

ditia

res

in S

ectio

n D

or

Sect

ion

E. I

nclu

decu

rren

t fun

d ex

pend

i-

ture

s fo

r eq

uipm

ent a

nd f

acili

ties

as w

ell a

spla

nt a

nd o

ther

fun

ds.

FIE

LD

OF

SCIE

NC

E

SOU

RC

E O

F FU

ND

S (T

HO

USA

ND

S O

F D

OL

LA

RS)

TO

TA

L(1

)

1FE

DE

RA

LI

GO

VE

RN

-M

EN

T(2

)

STA

TE

AN

D L

OC

AL

GO

VE

RN

ME

NT

(3)

OT

HE

RSO

UR

CE

S(4

)

13.1

All

purp

oses

(to

tal)

a. E

ngin

eeri

ngb.

Phy

sica

l and

env

iron

men

tal s

cien

ces

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

y ...

......

:.

..

..

f.So

cial

sci

ence

s

Ir. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

2312

13.9

a1+

1320

.

137,

297

$19

,593

136,

235

-3-1

--1,

062

1330

3,40

13,

375

-26

1340

2,78

5 202,

785 15

-13

50

1360

1712

+3

1370

181+

175

-9

h. T

otal

(su

m o

f a

to g

)13

00$

163,

328

S16

2,19

2-

1,13

6

13.2

Res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t and

/or

grad

uate

inst

ruct

ion

a. E

ngin

eeri

ng

b. P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

l sci

ence

s

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

y

f.So

cial

sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1311

$19

624

S19

,593

31

1321

137,

297

3,2+

01

n6,2

35_

1 06

213

313

375

2613

412,

785

2,78

5_

1351

2015

5

1361

1714

1371

1817

59

h. T

otal

(su

m °

fa to

g)

1301

$16

3,32

8,

162,

192

1,13

6

13.3

Und

ergr

adua

te in

stru

ctio

n

a. E

ngin

eeri

ngb.

Phy

sica

l and

env

iron

men

tal s

cien

ces

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

y

f.So

cial

sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1312

S1

1322

1332

1342

1352

1362

1372

_

h. T

otal

(su

m o

f a

to g

)13

02$

RE

MA

RK

S: I

f ad

ditio

nal s

pace

is n

eede

d, a

ttach

an

extr

a pa

ge.

Page 172: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

00

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

y

f.So

cial

sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

_

i ,.5

,5()

(_)

1340

2,78

5f f

2,78

1513

5020

5

1360

17i

143

1370

1811

175

9h.

Tot

al (

sum

of

a to

g)

1300

a16

3, 3

28'

162,

192

1,13

613

.2R

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent a

nd/7

gra

duat

e in

stru

ctio

n

a. E

ngin

eeri

ngb.

Phy

sica

l and

env

iron

men

tal s

cien

ces

c.M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife

scie

nces

e.Ps

ycho

logy

1.So

cial

sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1311

S19

6214

.s,

19,5

93-

31

1321

137,

297

d i

136.

, 235

3,37

5-

106

2 2613

313,

1401

1341

2, 7

85j

2, 7

8513

5120

15

1361

17i

111

1371

1811

1

175

9

h. T

otal

(su

m o

f a

to g

)13

01$

163,

328

S16

2,19

21,

136

13.3

Und

ergr

adua

te in

stru

ctio

n

a. E

ngin

eeri

ngv

b. P

hysi

cal a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

l sci

ence

s

c. M

athe

mat

ics

d. L

ife

scie

nces

e. P

sych

olog

y

1.So

cial

sci

ence

s

g. O

ther

sci

ence

s, N

EC

1312

S

1322

i

1332

1 1

1342

1352

1362

1372

__

h. T

otal

(su

m o

f a

to g

)13

02$

_

RE

MA

RK

S:

If a

dditi

onal

spa

ce is

nee

ded,

atta

ch a

n ex

tra

page

.

NA

ME

OF

PER

SON

SU

BM

ITT

ING

TH

IS F

OR

MT

ITL

E

NA

ME

OF

INST

ITU

TIO

NA

DD

RE

SS (

num

ber,

str

eet,

city

, sta

te, Z

IP c

ode)

AR

EA

CO

DE

, TE

LEP

HO

NE

NO

., E

XT

.D

AT

E

4_

Page 173: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

I

I

85

Appendix E

Reproduction of Covering Letterand InstructioW

'The questionnaires used in the survey are reproduced in appendixes B, C, and D. NSF form 411in appendix C was used to obtain data for the university or college as a whole, while NSF Form 412was used to obtain separate data for medical schools and university administered FFRDC's,respectively.

1

1

Page 174: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

NA

TIO

NA

L S

CIE

NC

E F

OU

ND

AT

ION

WA

SHIN

GT

ON

, D C

205

50

November

25,'1970

1970

Dear Sir:

The National Science Foundation requests your assistance,in

its Survey of Scientific Activities of Institutions ofHigher

Education, 1971.

The enclosed questionnaire seeks information

on the employment of scientific and

engineering personnel in

January 1971 and the financing of scientific and

engineering

activities at your institution during academic year

1969770.

Please return the completed questionnaire in the

enclosed

self-addressed envelope in January 1971, or as soon thereafter

as possible.

As you may know, this survey of universities and colleges

is

conducted biennially as an integral part of NSF's program

of

periodic surveys and studies designed to gather factual

information on the allocation of scientific and engineering

resources in industry, the Federal Government,

universities

and colleges, and other nonprofit institutions.

The results

of such studies are used by the National Science Foundation

co

and other public and private organizations in theformulation

of policies and programs to strengthen science and technology

throughout the national economy.

Enclosed also is a self-addressed postcard requesting the

name and title of the official assigned to complete the

questionnaire for your institution.

Your prompt return of

this postcard to the National Science Foundaticn will insure

that any inquiries regarding your institution's participation

in the survey wilkipe directed to the appropriate

official.

If any questions arise regarding the interpretation of the

survey questionnaire, please write or callDr. Joseph H.

Schuster (Area Code 202, 632-4080) at the Foundation's

Office

of Economic and Manpower Studies.

The Foundation is grateful for your past cooperation and will

appreciate your participation in this survey.

Enclosures

Sincerely yours,

;.,

IJ

1I

. (.

Charles E. Falk

O./

Director, Division of Science

Resources and Policy Studies

Page 175: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

NS

F F

orm

s 41

1 an

d 41

2N

AT

ION

AL

SC

IEN

CE

FO

UN

DA

TIO

NIn

stru

ctio

n S

heet

Was

hing

ton,

D.C

. 205

50

INS

TR

UC

TIO

NS

FO

R S

UR

VE

Y O

F S

CIE

NT

IFIC

AC

TIV

ITIE

S O

FIN

ST

ITU

TIO

NS

OF

HIG

HE

R E

DU

CA

TIO

N, 1

971

OU

TLI

NE

OF

INS

TR

UC

TIO

NS

GE

NE

RA

L

Peri

od C

over

ed b

y th

e R

epor

tR

epor

ting

Uni

ts

PA

RT

I.P

ER

SO

NN

EL

DA

TA

Sect

ion

Pag

e 2 2

A.

Num

ber

of S

cien

tists

and

Eng

inee

rs (

Item

s I

to 4

)4

Num

ber

of G

radu

ate

Stud

ents

Eng

aged

Par

t Tim

e as

Scie

ntis

ts a

nd E

ngin

eers

(It

em 5

)6

Sect

ion

B.

Sect

ion

C.

Num

ber

of T

echn

icia

ns E

mpl

oyed

in th

e Sc

ienc

es a

ndE

ngin

eeri

ng (

Item

6)

6

PA

RT

II.

FIN

AN

CIA

L D

AT

ASe

ctio

n D

.C

urre

nt E

xpen

ditu

res

for

Sepa

rate

ly B

udge

ted

Res

earc

h an

d D

evel

opm

ent (

Item

s 7

to 1

0)7

Sect

ion

E.

Cur

rent

Exp

endi

ture

s fo

r In

stru

ctio

n an

dD

epar

tmen

tal R

esea

rch

in th

e Sc

ienc

es a

ndE

ngin

eeri

ng (

Item

s 11

and

12)

10

Sect

ion

F.C

apita

l Exp

endi

ture

s fo

r Sc

ient

ific

' and

Eng

inee

ring

Faci

litie

s an

d E

quip

men

t for

Res

earc

h,D

evel

opm

ent,

and

Inst

ruct

ion

(Ite

m 1

3)10

GE

NE

RA

L

The

Nat

iona

l Sci

ence

Fou

ndat

ion

requ

ests

your

coo

pera

tion

in c

ompl

etin

g th

e at

tach

edqu

estio

nnai

re c

over

ing

the

pers

onne

l and

fi-

nanc

ial c

hara

cter

istic

s of

you

r in

stitu

tion

as th

eyre

late

to th

e sc

ienc

es a

nd e

ngin

eeri

ng.

The

pur

pose

of

this

sur

vey

is to

obt

ain

stat

is-

tical

dat

a on

the

reso

urce

s de

vote

d to

sci

entif

icac

tiviti

es a

tin

stitu

tions

of

high

er e

duca

tion.

Thi

s in

form

atio

n w

ill a

ssis

t the

Nat

iona

l Sci

ence

Foun

datio

n to

ful

fill

its r

espo

nsib

ilitie

s in

sup

-po

rtin

g ba

sic

rese

arch

and

edu

catio

n in

the

scie

nces

and

in th

e fo

rmul

atio

n of

rec

omm

en-

datio

ns o

n na

tiona

l sci

ence

pol

icy

in k

eepi

ngw

ith th

e N

atio

nal S

cien

ce F

ound

atio

n A

cts

of19

50 a

nd 1

968.

Eac

h in

stitu

tion

incl

uded

in th

is s

urve

y is

requ

este

d to

sup

ply

data

on

the

num

ber

of s

ci-

entif

ic a

nd te

chni

cal p

erso

nnel

eng

aged

in s

cien

-tif

ic a

nd e

ngin

eeri

ng a

ctiv

ities

; the

tota

l cur

rent

expe

nditu

res

for

sepa

rate

lybu

dget

ed(i

.e.,

orga

nize

d) r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent (

R&

D);

curr

ent e

xpen

ditu

res

for

inst

ruct

ion

and

depa

rt-

men

tal r

esea

rch

in th

e sc

ienc

es a

nd e

ngin

eeri

ng:

and

capi

tal e

xpen

ditu

res

for

scie

ntif

ic a

nd e

ngi-

neer

ing

faci

litie

s an

d eq

uipm

ent f

or r

esea

rch.

de-

velo

pmen

t, an

d in

stru

ctio

n. B

ecau

se in

form

atio

non

som

e ite

ms

may

not

be

avai

labl

e fr

om r

ec-

ords

nor

mal

ly m

aint

aine

d by

you

r in

stitu

tion.

reas

onab

le e

stim

ates

for

suc

h ite

ms

will

be

satis

-fa

ctor

y. E

nter

"0"

as

a to

tal,

rath

er th

an le

ave

an it

em b

lank

.

Page 176: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Thi

s su

rvey

is g

ener

ally

com

para

ble

to th

atco

nduc

ted

by th

ii of

fice

in 1

969,

cov

erin

g ex

-pe

nditu

res

for

the

acad

emic

yea

r 19

67-6

8 an

dm

anpo

wer

as

of m

id-J

anua

ry 1

969.

Whe

re d

ata

repo

rted

in th

is s

urve

y di

ffer

sig

nifi

cant

ly f

rom

thos

e re

port

ed in

the

prev

ious

sur

vey,

ple

ase

atta

ch a

sho

rt n

ote

in th

e sp

ace

prov

ided

for

"rem

arks

" in

dica

ting

the

reas

ons

for

the

diff

o-en

ce, s

uch

as "

open

ing

of n

ew m

edic

al s

choo

l,"et

c.If

you

hav

e an

y qu

estio

ns r

egar

ding

info

r-m

atio

n re

ques

ted

on th

is f

orm

, wri

te to

Uni

ver-

sitie

s an

d N

onpr

ofit

,Ins

titut

ions

Stu

dies

Gro

up,

Nat

iona

l Sci

ence

Fou

ndat

ion,

Was

hing

ton,

D.C

.,20

550.

Add

ition

al f

orm

s m

ay b

e ob

tain

ed b

yw

ritin

g to

the

abov

e ad

dres

s.

PE

RIO

D C

OV

ER

ED

BY

TH

E R

EP

OR

T

Pers

onne

l dat

a (P

art I

) ar

e to

be

repo

rted

as

of m

id-J

anua

ry 1

971,

or

as c

lose

ther

eto

as p

os-

sibl

e. The

tim

e pe

riod

cov

ered

in th

e fi

nanc

ial s

ec-

tions

of

the

form

(Pa

rt I

I) is

the

fisc

al y

ear

whi

ch b

egan

on

July

I, 1

969,

and

end

ed o

n Ju

ne30

, 197

0, o

r yo

ur in

stitu

tion'

s eq

uiva

lent

fis

cal

year

end

ing

in 1

970.

RE

PO

RT

ING

UN

ITS

Thi

s su

rvey

cov

ers

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t,an

d ot

her

scie

ntif

ic a

ctiv

ities

of

all b

ranc

hes

and

othe

r un

its o

f th

e pa

rent

inst

itutio

n, b

oth

onan

d of

f th

e m

ain

cam

pus,

in th

e U

nite

d St

ates

and

its o

utly

ing

area

s.E

very

inst

itutio

n sh

ould

com

plet

e a

whi

tefo

rm (

NSF

For

m 4

11)

pres

entin

g ag

greg

ate

data

for

the

entir

e in

stitu

tion,

exc

lusi

ve o

f un

iver

-si

ty-a

dmin

iste

red

Fede

rally

Fun

ded

Res

earc

han

d D

evel

opm

ent C

ent r

s (F

FRD

C's

). I

nstit

u-tio

ns a

dmin

iste

ring

FFR

DC

's s

houl

d ex

clud

eFF

RD

C d

ata

from

For

m 4

11. M

edic

al s

choo

lda

ta, h

owev

er, s

houl

d be

incl

uded

on

Form

411

.If

dat

a ar

e re

ques

ted

for

one

or m

ore

units

of

anin

stitu

tion,

blu

e fo

rms

(NSF

For

m 4

12)

will

be

atta

ched

with

the

nam

es o

f th

e un

its c

once

rned

ente

red

on th

em. T

he b

lue

form

sho

uld

be c

om-

plet

ed f

or o

nly

that

par

t of

the

inst

itutio

n w

hich

is s

peci

fied

on

the

form

. If

your

inst

itutio

n ha

sno

t rec

eive

d fo

rms

for

all s

uch

units

, as

de-

scri

bed

inth

ein

stru

ctio

ns b

elow

, add

ition

alfo

rms

will

be

supp

lied

upon

req

uest

.

For

purp

oses

of

this

sur

vey,

the

vari

ous

or-

gani

zatio

nal u

nits

of

colle

ges

and

univ

ersi

ties

for

whi

ch a

blu

e qu

estio

nnai

re (

NSF

For

m 4

12)

isre

ques

ted

are

defi

ned

as f

ollo

ws:

Fede

rally

Fun

ded

Res

earc

h an

d D

evel

op-

men

t Cen

ters

. as

desi

gnat

ed b

y Fe

dera

l age

ncie

s.ar

e R

&D

org

aniz

atio

ns e

xclu

sive

ly o

r su

bsta

n-tia

lly f

inan

ced

by th

e G

over

nmen

t, an

d ad

min

is-

tere

d on

a c

ontr

actu

al b

asis

by

educ

atio

nal i

nsti-

tutio

ns o

r ot

her

orga

niza

tions

.M

edic

al S

choo

ls a

re th

ose

two-

or

four

-yea

rsc

hool

s of

med

icin

e ap

prov

ed b

y th

e C

ounc

il on

Med

ical

Edu

catio

n an

d H

ospi

tals

and

the

Ass

o-ci

atio

n of

'Am

eric

an M

edic

al C

olle

ges.

Inc

lude

dar

e ho

spita

ls o

r cl

inic

s ow

ned,

ope

rate

d, o

r co

n-tr

olle

d by

uni

vers

ities

and

inte

grat

ed o

pera

tion-

ally

with

the

clin

ical

pro

gram

s of

thei

r m

edic

alsc

hool

s. A

lso

incl

uded

are

res

earc

h bu

reau

s or

inst

itute

s w

hich

are

inte

gral

par

ts o

f m

edic

alsc

hool

s. I

n ad

ditio

n, in

clud

e th

ose

rese

arch

bu-

reau

s an

d in

stitu

tes

whi

ch a

re n

onun

iver

sity

owne

d bu

t are

aff

iliat

ed w

ith th

e m

edic

al s

choo

lan

d an

y un

iver

sity

bur

eaus

and

inst

itute

s w

hich

may

be

outs

ide

the

depa

rtm

enta

l str

uctu

re o

fun

iver

sitie

s bu

t who

se s

enio

r re

sear

ch s

taff

mem

-be

rs h

old

teac

hing

app

oint

men

ts w

ith m

edic

alsc

hool

s.A

ltern

ativ

e R

epor

ting

Proc

edur

e A

l tho

ugh

NSF

For

m 4

11 is

inte

nded

to b

e us

ed to

rep

ort

data

for

the

inst

itute

as

a w

hole

, it i

s re

cogn

ized

that

som

e in

stitu

tions

may

fin

d it

conv

enie

nt to

subm

it se

para

te r

epor

ts f

or b

ranc

hes

or o

ther

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

ts. I

f yo

ur in

stitu

tion

pref

ers

to s

ubm

it se

para

te r

epor

ts f

or b

ranc

hes

or o

ther

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

ts r

athe

r th

an a

sin

gle

repo

rtco

veri

ng th

e en

tire

inst

itutio

n, li

st in

the

spac

epr

ovid

ed o

n th

e fi

rst p

age

of N

SF F

orm

411

all

bran

ches

or

othe

r or

gani

zatio

nal u

nits

of

your

inst

itutio

n w

hich

hav

e be

en e

xclu

ded

from

NSF

Form

411

and

for

whi

ch s

epar

ate

repo

rts

are

bein

g su

bmitt

ed. T

his

proc

edur

e m

ay b

e us

ed in

the

case

of

sepa

rate

org

aniz

atio

nal u

nits

for

whi

ch s

epar

ate

data

hav

e be

en p

rovi

ded

on N

SFFo

rm 4

12.

NO

TE

: Sep

arat

e da

ta o

n th

e sc

ient

ific

act

iviti

esof

agr

icul

tura

l exp

erim

ent s

tatio

ns, a

gric

ultu

ral

exte

nsio

n se

rvic

es a

nd a

ffili

ated

col

lege

s of

agr

i-cu

lture

are

not

req

uest

ed in

this

sur

vey.

How

...*

ever

, dat

a fo

r th

ese

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

ts s

houl

dbe

incl

uded

in th

e re

port

for

the

inst

itutio

n as

aw

hole

.

Page 177: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

PA

RT

IPE

RS

ON

NE

L D

AT

A(I

nclu

des

item

s 1

to 6

of

the

surv

ey q

uest

ionn

aire

)

The

sur

vey

requ

ests

dat

a on

the

num

ber

ofpr

ofes

sion

al a

nd te

chni

cal p

erso

nnel

em

ploy

edor

eng

aged

in s

cien

ce a

nd e

ngin

eerin

g ac

tiviti

esin

all

bran

ches

and

oth

er o

rgan

izat

iona

l uni

ts o

fyo

ur in

stitu

tion,

whe

ther

on

or o

ff th

e m

ain

cam

pus,

in th

e U

nite

d S

tate

s or

in it

s ou

tlyin

gar

eas.

Incl

ude

all s

uch

pers

onne

l who

wer

e pa

ida

sala

ry o

r st

ipen

d an

d m

embe

rs o

f rel

igio

us o

r-de

rs w

ho r

ecei

ved

no r

emun

erat

ion

whi

le e

m-

ploy

ed a

t the

inst

itutio

n. E

xclu

de p

erso

nnel

on

sabb

atic

al o

r ot

her

leav

e st

atus

and

per

sonn

elem

ploy

ed in

bra

nche

s of

you

r in

stitu

tion

lo-

cate

d in

fore

ign

coun

trie

s. A

lso

excl

ude

volu

n-ta

ry w

orke

rs, s

uch

as v

olun

tary

sta

ff m

embe

rs a

tm

edic

al a

nd d

enta

l sch

ools

.R

epor

t dat

a fo

r sc

ient

ific

and

tech

nica

l per

-so

nnel

em

ploy

ed a

s of

mid

-Jan

uary

197

1, o

r as

clos

e to

that

dat

e as

pos

sibl

e.C

ateg

orie

s of

sci

entif

ic a

nd e

ngin

eerin

g pe

r-so

nnel

for

who

m th

e su

rvey

req

uest

s se

para

teda

ta a

re a

s fo

llow

s: F

ull-t

ime

and

part

-tim

e sc

i-en

tists

and

eng

inee

rs (

Sec

tion

A),

gra

duat

e st

u-de

nts

enga

ged

part

tim

e as

sci

entis

ts a

nd e

ngi-

neer

s (S

ectio

n B

), a

nd te

chni

cian

s em

ploy

ed in

the

scie

nces

and

eng

inee

ring

(Sec

tion

C).

Add

i-tio

nal i

nfor

mat

ion

rega

rdin

g pr

oced

ures

to b

eus

ed in

rep

ortin

g pe

rson

nel d

ata

is in

clud

ed in

inst

ruct

ions

rel

atin

g to

indi

vidu

al S

ectio

ns o

rite

ms.

.T

he fo

llow

ing

inst

ruct

ions

rel

ate

to th

e re

-

port

ing

of s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs b

y th

ose

inst

i-tu

tions

with

sepa

rate

adm

inis

trat

ive

units

(FF

RD

C's

and

med

ical

sch

ools

) fo

r w

hich

NS

FF

orm

412

(bl

ue q

uest

ionn

aire

) w

ill b

e pr

epar

ed.

A.

For

Fede

rally

Fun

ded

Res

earc

h an

d D

e-ve

lopm

ent C

ente

rsin

clud

e da

ta fo

r sc

ient

ists

and

engi

neer

s ho

ldin

g ap

poin

tmen

ts a

t the

cen

-te

r.P

erso

nnel

hol

ding

join

t app

oint

men

ts in

mor

e th

an o

ne o

rgan

izat

iona

l uni

t inc

ludi

ng a

cent

er a

re to

be

repo

rted

for

the

cent

er o

nly

ifth

ey h

eld

thei

r pr

inci

pal a

ppoi

ntm

ents

with

the

cent

er.

B.

For

med

ical

sch

ools

incl

ude

as s

cien

tists

only

thos

e ph

ysic

ians

, den

tists

. pub

lic h

ealth

spec

ialis

ts,

phar

mac

ists

,et

c., w

ho s

pend

the

grea

test

pro

port

ion

of th

eir

time

in te

achi

ng.

clin

ical

inve

stig

atio

n, o

r ot

her

R&

D a

ctiv

ities

.E

xclu

de a

ll m

edic

al p

ract

ition

ers

who

spe

nd th

egr

eate

st p

ropo

rtio

n of

thei

r tim

e pr

ovid

ing

pa-

tient

car

e, d

ispe

nsin

g dr

ugs

or s

ervi

ces,

or

indi

agno

sis.

etc

. Exc

lude

unp

aid

volu

ntar

y st

aff.

Incl

ude

scie

ntis

ts e

mpl

oyed

,by

hosp

itals

or

clin

ics

owne

d, o

pera

ted,

or

cont

rolle

d by

the

univ

ersi

ty a

nd in

tegr

ated

ope

ratio

nally

with

the

clin

ical

pro

gram

s of

the

med

ical

sch

ool.

Incl

ude

resi

dent

s em

ploy

ed in

suc

h ho

spita

ls o

r cl

inic

s.bu

tex

clud

e in

tern

s.S

tude

nt h

ealth

ser

vice

s ar

eno

t to

be in

clud

ed in

the

form

for

the

med

ical

scho

ol.

Cla

ssifi

catio

n of

Fie

lds

of E

mpl

oym

ent

List

ed b

elow

are

the

broa

d an

d de

taile

dfie

lds

of e

mpl

oym

ent w

ith a

dditi

onal

exp

lana

-tio

n of

cov

erag

e, w

hich

are

to b

e us

ed in

cla

ssi-

fyin

g sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs in

clud

ed in

Par

t I,

item

s1

thro

ugh

6. P

leas

e cl

assi

fy p

erso

ns e

m-

ploy

ed in

inte

rdis

cipl

inar

y or

mul

tidis

cipl

inar

ysp

ecia

lizat

ions

inth

e lis

ted

field

s w

ith w

hich

Eng

inee

rs:

Aer

onau

tical

Che

mic

al (

incl

udes

cer

amic

)C

ivil

(incl

udes

arc

hite

ctur

al, s

truc

tura

l. sa

nita

ry)

Ele

ctric

al (

incl

udes

ele

ctro

nic)

Mec

hani

cal

Oth

er (

incl

udes

agr

icul

tura

l, in

dust

rial,

min

ing

and

met

allu

r-gi

cal.

nucl

ear,

text

ile)

thei

r ac

tiviti

es (

teac

hing

, res

earc

h, o

r ot

her)

are

mos

t clo

sely

iden

tifie

d. F

or e

xam

ple,

a s

cien

tist

empl

oyed

in g

ener

al c

ateg

orie

s su

ch a

s sc

ienc

eed

ucat

ion

shou

ld b

e cl

assi

fied

into

the

disc

iplin

em

ost c

lose

ly r

elat

ed to

the

acad

emic

req

uire

-m

ents

of h

is p

ositi

on, s

uch

as m

athe

mat

ics,

soci

olog

y, o

r ps

ycho

logy

.

Phy

sica

l sci

entis

ts:

Che

mis

tsE

arth

sci

entis

ts (

incl

udes

geo

logi

sts.

geo

phys

icis

ts. m

eteo

rol-

ogis

ts, o

cean

ogra

pher

s, p

hysi

cal g

eogr

aphe

rs)

Phy

sici

sts

Oth

er p

hysi

cal s

cien

tists

(in

clud

es a

stro

nom

ers,

met

allu

r-gi

sts)

Mat

hem

atic

ians

; (in

clud

es s

tatis

ticia

ns a

nd c

ompu

ter

scie

ntis

ts)

Page 178: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Life

sci

enth

qs:

Agr

icul

tura

l sci

entis

ts (

incl

udes

agr

onom

ists

. for

este

rs, b

us.

band

rym

cn. h

ortic

ultu

rists

. soi

l sci

entis

ts)

Bio

logi

cal

scie

ntis

ts (

incl

udes

ana

tom

ists

. bac

terio

logi

sts.

bota

nist

s, g

enet

icis

ts. m

icro

biol

ogis

ts, p

atho

logi

sts.

pha

r-m

acol

ogis

ts. p

hysi

olog

ists

, zoo

logi

sts)

Med

ical

sci

entis

ts (

incl

udes

all

bran

ches

of m

edic

al. d

enta

l.ve

terin

ary

med

icin

e an

d ot

her

clin

ical

fiel

ds)

Psy

chol

ogis

ts: (

incl

udes

clin

ical

, soc

ial.

educ

atio

nal.

indu

stria

lan

d pe

rson

nel,

coun

selin

g an

d gu

idan

ce, a

nd e

xper

imen

tal

psyc

holo

gist

s)

Soc

ial s

cien

tists

:E

cono

mis

ts (

incl

udes

agr

icul

tura

l eco

nom

ists

. eco

nom

ctri-

clan

s)S

ocio

logi

sts

Pol

itica

l sci

entis

tsH

isto

rians

Oth

er s

ocia

l sci

entis

ts (

incl

udes

ant

hrop

olog

ists

, arc

heol

o-gi

sts.

dem

ogao

crs.

soc

ial a

nd e

cono

mic

geo

grap

hers

)

Sec

tion

AN

umbe

r of

Sci

entis

ts a

nd E

ngin

eers

(Exc

lusi

ve o

f gra

duat

e st

uden

ts)

(Not

e: F

igur

es o

n gr

adua

te s

tude

nts

enga

ged

part

tim

e as

sci

entis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

sho

uld

he r

epor

ted

in S

ectio

n 0)

Thi

s se

ctio

n re

ques

ts d

ata

on f

ull-

time

and

part

-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs e

mpl

oyed

or

enga

ged

in te

achi

ng, r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent.

or o

ther

act

iviti

es. T

he r

epor

ting

inst

itutio

n is

requ

este

d to

use

its o

wn

defi

nitio

n of

wha

tco

nstit

utes

a f

ull-

time

appo

intm

ent.

Scie

ntis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

incl

ude

sala

ried

per

-so

nnel

of

your

inst

itutio

n w

ho h

ave

rece

ived

aba

chel

or's

deg

ree

or h

ighe

r or

, if

fore

ign

edu-

cate

d, a

cade

mic

trai

ning

equ

al to

a b

ache

lor's

degr

ee o

r hi

gher

, and

who

are

wor

king

at a

pro

-fe

ssio

nal l

evel

(a

leve

l at w

hich

the

know

ledg

eac

quir

ed b

y su

ch a

cade

mic

trai

r;ng

is e

ssen

tial i

nth

e pe

rfor

man

ce o

f du

ties)

in th

e sc

ienc

es o

ren

gine

erin

g.11

em 1

. Ful

l-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

yfi

eld

and

func

tion

in w

hich

pri

mar

ily e

mpl

oyed

.an

d to

tal

full-

time

equi

vale

nts,

by

func

tion.

Janu

ary

1971

.In

item

s la

to 1

g, th

e fu

nctio

nal c

lass

ific

a-tio

n of

pro

fess

iona

l per

sonn

elin

tote

achi

ng(c

olum

n2)

;R

&D

(co

lum

n 3)

and

oth

er a

ctiv

i-tie

s (c

olum

n 4)

, sho

uld

be b

ased

on

the

func

tion

in w

hich

the

pers

on is

pri

mar

ily e

ngag

ed o

r em

-pl

oyed

at t

he in

stitu

tion.

For

exa

mpl

e, a

per

son

enga

ged

in tw

o or

all

thre

e of

the

spec

ifie

d fu

nc-

tiona

l cat

egor

ies

shou

ld b

e cl

assi

fied

in th

e fu

nc-

tion

in w

hich

he

spen

t- th

e la

rges

t pro

port

ion

ofhi

s tim

e. I

n cl

assi

fyin

g pe

rson

nel b

y fu

nctio

n,ta

ke in

to a

ccou

nt o

nly

activ

ities

car

ried

out

unde

r th

e au

spic

es o

r th

e of

fici

al e

ncou

rage

men

tof

you

r in

stitu

tion.

Exc

lude

out

side

con

sulti

ngw

ork

and

teac

hing

not

per

form

ed u

nder

the

aus-

pice

s of

you

r in

stitu

tion.

In c

lass

ifyi

ng a

n in

divi

dual

und

er a

par

ticul

ar

cate

gory

(te

achi

ng, r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent,

or o

ther

act

iviti

es),

take

into

con

side

ratio

n al

lof

fici

al a

ctiv

ities

eve

n if

car

ried

on

in a

sch

ool o

rde

part

men

t oth

er th

an th

e on

e in

whi

ch h

eho

lds

his

prin

cipa

l app

oint

men

t.T

each

ing

(col

umn

2) is

def

ined

as

enco

mpa

s-si

ng th

ose

activ

ities

con

nect

ed w

ith d

egre

e cr

edit

cotir

ses

or w

hich

are

inte

nded

to le

ad u

ltim

atel

yto

Ith

e gr

antin

g of

deg

rees

or

cert

ific

ates

or

topr

ofes

sion

al c

ertif

icat

ion

or li

cens

ing.

Inc

lude

dar

e su

ch f

unct

ions

as

inst

ruct

ion

and

trai

ning

perf

orm

edin

con

nect

ion

with

deg

ree

cred

itco

urse

s an

d th

e ad

min

istr

atio

n of

suc

h in

stru

c-tio

n an

d tr

aini

ng. A

lso

incl

ude

inst

ruct

ion

of in

-te

rns,

res

iden

ts, a

nd o

ther

pro

fess

iona

l per

sonn

elre

ceiv

ing

adva

nced

trai

ning

suc

h as

pos

tdoc

tora

lfe

llow

s or

trai

nees

.T

ime

spen

t by

facu

lty o

r ot

her

staf

f m

em-

bers

in s

uper

visi

ng th

e th

esis

wor

k of

gra

duat

est

uden

ts is

con

side

red

to b

e pa

rt o

f th

e te

achi

ngfu

nctio

n.R

esew

-di a

nd d

evel

opm

ent i

nclu

de b

asic

and

z;pp

lied

rese

arch

inth

e sc

ienc

es a

nd in

eng

i-ne

erin

g, a

nd d

esig

n an

d dv

elop

men

t of

prot

o-ty

pes

and

proc

esse

s (c

olum

n 3)

. Inc

lude

d in

this

func

tion

is th

e pr

epar

atio

n fo

r pu

blic

atio

n of

book

s an

d pa

pers

des

crib

ing

the

resu

lts o

f th

esp

ecif

ic r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent,

if c

arri

ed o

utas

,an

inte

gral

par

t of

that

res

earc

h an

d de

velo

p-m

ent.

Als

o in

clud

ed is

the

adm

inis

trat

ion

of r

e-se

arch

and

dev

elop

men

t.U

nder

oth

er a

curi

lles

(col

umn

4) r

epor

t all

prO

fess

iona

l per

sonn

el n

ot p

rim

arily

em

ploy

edin

'tea

chin

g or

res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t,as

de-

fined

abov

e. E

xam

ples

of

such

act

iviti

es a

re a

gri-

Page 179: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

cultu

ral d

emon

stra

tion

wor

k; a

dult

educ

atio

n (if

not d

egre

e cr

edit)

; dis

sem

inat

ion

of s

cien

tific

in-

form

atio

n: a

nd s

tude

nt h

ealth

ser

vice

s. In

clud

eas

scie

ntis

ts o

nly

thos

e ph

ysic

ians

,de

ntis

ts,

publ

ic h

ealth

spe

cial

ists

, pha

rmac

ists

, etc

., w

hosp

end

the

grea

test

pro

port

ion

of th

eir

time

inte

achi

ng, c

linic

alin

vest

igat

ion,

or

othe

r R

&D

activ

ities

. Exc

lude

all

med

ical

pra

ctiti

oner

s w

hosp

end

the

grea

test

pro

port

ion

of th

eir

time

pro-

vidi

ng p

atie

nt c

are,

dis

pens

ing

drug

s or

ser

vice

s,or

in d

iagn

osis

, etc

.In

item

1h,

cla

ssify

per

sonn

el r

epor

t d in

item

Ig in

eac

h of

the

thre

e fu

nctio

ns o

n a

full-

time-

equi

vale

nt b

asis

. App

ortio

n tim

e of

sta

ffm

embe

rs a

mon

g th

e th

ree

func

tions

on

the

basi

sof

the

prop

ortio

n of

effo

rt o

r tim

e sp

ent i

n ea

chof

the

func

tions

. For

exa

mpl

e, 2

4 in

divi

dual

sde

votin

g th

ree-

four

ths

time

tote

achi

ng a

ndon

e-fo

urth

to r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent s

houl

dbe

rep

orte

d as

18

in te

achi

ng a

nd 6

in r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent.

Cal

cula

te fu

ll-tim

e eq

uiva

lent

sto

the

near

est w

hole

num

ber.

In it

em I

h, fi

gure

sin

col

umns

2,3

, and

4 s

houl

d ad

d to

the

tota

l in

colu

mn

1.Ite

m 2

. Ful

l-tim

e sc

ient

ists

and

eng

inee

rs, b

yfie

ld in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyed

and

hig

hest

earn

ed d

egre

e, J

anua

ry 1

971.

Rep

ort s

cien

tists

and

eng

inee

rs in

the

field

inw

hich

they

are

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed b

y th

e in

sti-

tutio

n. P

erso

nnel

eng

aged

in a

dmin

istr

atio

n or

com

mun

ity s

ervi

ce s

houl

d be

cla

ssifi

edin

the

field

mos

t clo

sely

rel

ated

to th

eir

pres

ent e

m-

ploy

men

t at t

he in

stitu

tion.

For

the

purp

oses

of t

his

surv

ey, e

arne

d de

-gr

ees

are

clas

sifie

d in

four

cat

egor

ies

as d

efin

edbe

low

:a,

Ph.

D. o

r S

c.D

. deg

rees

incl

ude

all s

uch

earn

ed d

egre

es.

Indi

vidu

als

hold

ing

both

the

Ph.

D. (

or S

c.D

.) d

egre

e an

d a

first

-pro

fess

iona

lde

gree

, suc

h as

the

M.D

., sh

ould

be

incl

uded

inco

lum

n 2.

b.In

clud

e in

divi

dual

s w

hose

hig

hest

ear

ned

degr

ees

are

first

-pro

fess

iona

lm

edic

al d

egre

esth

at in

dica

te th

e co

mpl

etio

n of

the

acad

emic

re-

quire

men

ts b

ased

on

prog

ram

s th

at r

equi

re a

tle

ast t

wo

acad

emic

yea

rs o

f pre

viou

s co

llege

wor

k fo

r en

tran

ce a

nd r

equi

re a

tota

l of a

t lea

stsi

x ac

adem

ic y

ears

of c

olle

ge w

ork

for

com

a le

-tio

n.S

peci

fical

ly, i

nclu

de in

col

umn

3 fir

st-

prof

essi

onal

deg

rees

in M

edic

ine

(M.D

.), D

en-

tistr

y (D

.D.S

. or

D.M

.D.)

, Vet

erni

nary

Med

icin

e(D

.V.M

.), C

hiro

pody

or

Pod

iatr

y (D

.S.C

. or

D.P

.),

Opt

omet

ry(O

.D.)

,an

dO

steo

path

y(D

.O.)

. Ind

ivid

uals

hol

ding

bot

h th

e P

h.D

. (or

Sc.

D.)

deg

ree

and

afir

st-p

rofe

ssio

nal d

egre

e,su

ch a

s th

e M

.D.,

shou

ld b

e in

clud

ed in

col

umn

2 as

men

tione

d in

(a)

abo

ve.

c.M

aste

r's d

egre

es in

clud

e al

l sec

ond-

leve

lde

gree

s ab

ove

the

bach

elor

's d

egre

e an

d be

low

the

Ph.

D. o

r S

c.D

. and

M.D

., D

.D.S

., an

d ot

her

first

-pro

fess

iona

l deg

rees

(co

lum

n 4)

.d.

Rep

ort

all

indi

vidu

als

who

se h

ighe

stea

rned

deg

ree

is th

e ba

chel

or's

deg

ree

or a

four

-or

five

-yea

rfir

st-p

rofe

ssio

nal d

egre

e, o

r w

hoha

ve th

e eq

uiva

lent

in e

xper

ienc

e, e

ven

if th

eyha

ve n

ot e

arne

d su

ch a

deg

ree

(col

umn

5).

Item

3. P

art-

time

scie

ntis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

, by

field

and

func

tion

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed;

and

tota

l ful

l-tim

e eq

uiva

lent

s, b

y fu

nctio

n, J

an-

uary

197

1.In

stru

ctio

ns fo

r ite

m I

rela

ting

to c

lass

ifica

-tio

n by

fiel

d an

d fu

nctio

n al

so r

elat

e to

par

t-tim

e pr

ofes

sion

al s

taff

in it

em 3

.In

est

imat

ing

the

full

-tim

e eq

uiva

lent

s of

part

-tim

e pe

rson

nel i

n ite

m 3

h, u

se y

our

inst

itu-

tion'

s de

finiti

on o

f suc

h eq

uiva

lent

s. T

hus,

four

part

-tim

e in

stru

ctor

s, e

ach

of w

hom

teac

hes

one

3-ho

ur c

redi

t cou

rse,

may

be

repo

rted

as

one

full-

time

equi

vale

nt in

teac

hing

, if f

our

such

cred

it co

urse

s w

ere

cons

ider

ed th

e lo

ad o

f afu

ll-tim

e in

stru

ctor

at y

our

inst

itutio

n. C

alcu

late

firll-

time

equi

vale

nts

toth

ene

ares

tw

hole

num

ber.

Item

4. P

art-

time

scie

ntis

ts a

nd e

ngin

eers

, by

field

in w

hich

prim

arily

em

ploy

ed a

nd h

ighe

stea

rned

deg

ree,

Jan

uary

197

1.T

he r

epor

ting

inst

itutio

n is

req

uest

ed to

ust

.its

ow

n de

finiti

on o

f wha

t con

stitu

tes

part

-tim

eem

ploy

men

t. In

stru

ctio

ns fo

r ite

m 2

rel

atin

g to

clas

sific

atio

n by

fiel

d an

d hi

ghes

t ear

ned

degr

eeal

so r

elat

e to

par

t-tim

e pr

ofes

sion

al s

taff

in it

em4.

Page 180: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Sec

tion

BN

umbe

r of

Gr

duat

e S

tude

nts

Eng

aged

Par

t Tim

e as

Sci

entis

ts a

nd E

ngin

eers

Item

5. G

radu

ate

stud

ents

rec

ei in

g co

mpe

n-sa

tion

for

part

-tim

e se

rvic

es a

s sc

iei

fists

and

en-

gine

ers

at y

our

inst

itutio

n, b

y fie

ld a

nd fu

nctio

nin

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

ngag

ed; a

nd to

tal f

ull-t

ime

equi

vale

nts,

by

func

tion,

Jan

uary

197

1.In

clud

e. a

ll gr

adua

te s

tude

nts

who

dev

ote

part

of t

heir

time

to a

cou

rse

of s

tudy

des

igne

dto

lead

to a

n ad

vanc

ed d

egre

e in

the

scie

nces

or

engi

nper

ing

and

who

als

o re

ceiv

e co

mpe

nsat

ion

from

" yo

ur in

stitu

tion

for

part

-tim

e pr

ofes

sion

alse

rvic

es p

erfo

rmed

inth

e sc

ienc

es o

r en

gi-

neer

ing.

Thi

s ca

tego

ry in

clud

es (

a) g

radu

ate

stu-

dent

s re

ceiv

ing

sala

ries

or w

ages

for

thei

r se

rvic

es

as te

achi

ng o

r re

sear

ch a

ssis

tant

s an

d (b

) gr

ad-

uate

stu

dent

s re

ceiv

ing

duty

stip

ends

, suc

h as

scho

lars

hips

, fel

low

ship

s, o

r tr

ainc

eshi

ps, t

hat r

e-qu

ire th

e pe

rfor

man

ce o

f pro

fess

iona

l ser

vice

s. in

the

scie

nces

or

engi

neer

ing

at y

our

inst

itutio

n.E

xclu

de g

radu

ate

stud

ents

rec

eivi

ng n

ondu

ty s

ti-pe

nds

and

othe

rs w

ho m

ay b

e en

gage

d in

sci

en-

tific

and

eng

inee

ring

activ

ities

on

a vo

lunt

ary

basi

s. Inst

ruct

ions

in it

em I

rega

rdin

g cl

assi

ficat

ion

by fi

eld

and

func

tion

may

be

used

in c

lass

ifyin

ggr

adua

te s

tude

nts

repo

rted

in it

em 5

.

Sec

tion

CN

umbe

r of

Tec

hnic

ians

Em

ploy

ed in

the

Sci

ence

s an

d E

ngin

eerin

g

Item

6. T

echn

icia

ns, b

y fie

ld a

nd fu

nctio

n in

whi

ch p

rimar

ily e

mpl

oyed

, Jan

uary

197

1.T

echn

icia

ns in

clud

e al

l per

sons

em

ploy

ed in

posi

tions

whi

ch in

volv

e te

chni

cal w

ork

at a

leve

l,re

quiri

ngkn

owle

dge

of e

ngin

eerin

g, m

athe

-m

atic

s, p

hysi

cal s

cien

ce, l

ife s

cien

ce, p

sych

ol-

ogy,

or

soci

al s

cien

ce c

ompa

rabl

e to

that

ac-

quire

d th

roug

h fo

rmal

pos

t hig

h sc

hool

trai

ning

it(le

ss th

an a

bac

helo

r's d

egre

e), s

uch

as th

at o

b-i t

aine

d at

tech

nica

l ins

titut

es a

nd ju

nior

colle

ges

or th

roug

h eq

uiva

lent

on-

the-

job

trai

ning

or

ex-

perie

nce.

All

pers

onne

l per

form

ing

the

dutie

s de

-sc

ribed

abo

ve s

houl

d be

rep

orte

d as

tech

nici

ans

even

if th

ey h

old

a ba

chel

or's

or

high

er d

egre

e.S

ome

typi

cal j

ob ti

tles

incl

ude

labo

rato

ry te

ch-

nici

an o

r as

sist

ant,

phys

ical

sci

ence

aid

e, e

ngi;

neer

ing

aide

, sta

tistic

alai

de, d

rafts

man

qco

mpu

ter

prog

ram

mer

.

Do

not i

nclu

de g

radu

ate

stud

ents

who

wer

ere

port

ed in

item

5. A

lso

excl

ude

craf

tsm

en s

uch

as e

lect

ricia

ns, c

arpe

nter

s, m

achi

nist

s, e

tc. I

n th

eca

se w

here

und

ergr

adua

te s

tude

nts,

juni

ors

orse

nior

s, a

rc e

mpl

oyed

in R

&D

act

iviti

es, t

hey

may

,w

here

appl

icab

le,

bein

clud

edas

tech

nici

ans.

Page 181: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

PA

RT

IIF

INA

NC

IAL

DA

TA

(Inc

lude

s ite

ms

7 to

13

of th

e su

rvey

que

stio

nnai

re)

Sec

tion

DC

urre

nt E

xpen

ditu

res

for

Sep

arat

ely

Bud

gete

d R

esea

rch

and

Dev

elop

men

t (R

&D

)

(Exp

endi

ture

s fo

r ca

pita

l equ

ipm

ent a

nd fa

cilit

ies

are

to b

e ex

clud

ed h

ere

but r

epor

ted

in S

ectio

n F

.)

In g

ener

al, f

inan

cial

dat

a re

ques

ted

in th

issu

rvey

are

inte

nded

to b

e co

nsis

tent

with

pri

n-ci

ples

of

fina

ncia

l acc

ount

ing

for

inst

itutio

ns o

fhi

gher

edu

catio

n pr

esen

ted

in C

olle

ge a

nd U

ni-

vers

ityB

usin

ess

Adm

inis

trat

ion

(Was

hing

ton,

D.C

.; A

mer

ican

Cou

ncil

on E

duca

tion,

196

8).

Sim

ilarl

y, d

ata

in th

is 's

urve

y ar

e re

late

d to

fin

an-

cial

dat

a re

port

ed in

U.S

. Off

ice

of E

duca

tion'

sH

ither

Edu

catio

n G

ener

al I

nfor

mat

ior

Surv

ey,

"Fin

anci

al S

tatis

tics

of I

nstit

utio

ns o

f H

ighe

rE

duca

tion.

" It

sho

uld

be n

oted

, how

ever

, tha

tth

ere

are

a fe

w te

rmin

olog

ical

and

oth

er d

iffe

r-en

ces

betw

een

the

pres

ent s

urve

y an

d th

e O

ffic

eof

Edu

catio

n su

rvey

cite

d ab

ove.

For

exa

mpl

e,th

e pr

esen

t sur

vey

uses

the

term

, "R

esea

rch

and

Dev

elop

men

t," to

den

ote

the

entir

e sp

ectr

um o

fse

para

tely

bud

gete

d R

&D

act

iviti

es, a

s de

fine

dab

ove,

whe

reas

the

Off

ice

of E

duca

tion

surv

eyus

es th

e te

rm, "

Org

aniz

ed R

esea

rch.

"

All

fina

ncia

l dat

a re

ques

ted

on th

is f

orm

shou

ld b

e re

port

ed in

thou

sand

s of

dol

lars

; for

exam

ple,

an

expe

nditu

re o

f $2

5,34

2 sh

ould

be

roun

ded

to th

e ne

ares

t tho

usan

d do

llars

and

re-

port

ed in

the

appr

opri

ate

colu

mns

as

$25,

DE

FIN

ITIO

N O

F R

ES

EA

RC

H A

ND

DE

VE

LOP

ME

NT

(R

&D

)

Res

earc

h an

dnn

t'nt i

nclu

de b

asi"

and

appl

ied

rese

arch

inth

e sc

ienc

es a

nd in

eng

i-ne

erin

g, a

nd d

esig

n an

d de

velo

pmen

t of

prot

o-ty

pes

and

proc

esse

s.R

esea

rch

isa

syst

emat

ic, i

nten

sive

, stu

dydi

rect

ed to

war

d fu

ller

know

ledg

e of

the

subj

ect

stud

ied.

Res

earc

h m

ay b

e ei

ther

bas

ic o

r ap

plie

d.B

asic

res

earc

h is

dir

ecte

d to

war

d an

incr

ease

of k

now

ledg

e; it

is r

esea

rch

whe

re th

e pr

imar

yai

m o

f th

e in

vest

igat

or is

a f

ulle

r kn

owle

dge

orun

ders

tand

ing

of th

e su

bjec

t und

er s

tudy

rat

her

that

. a p

ract

ical

app

licat

ion

ther

eof.

App

lied

rese

arch

is d

irec

ted

tow

ard

the

prac

-tic

al a

pplic

atio

n of

kno

wle

dge,

The

def

initi

on o

fap

plie

d re

sear

ch d

iffe

rs f

rom

, the

def

initi

on o

fba

sic

rese

arch

chi

efly

in te

rms

of th

e ob

ject

ives

of th

e in

vest

igat

or.

Dev

elop

men

t is

the

syst

emat

ic u

se o

f kn

owl-

edge

dir

ecte

d to

war

d th

e de

sign

and

pro

duct

ion

of u

sefu

l pro

toty

pes,

mat

eria

ls, d

evic

es, s

yste

ms,

met

hods

, or

proc

esse

s.It

does

not

incl

ude

qual

ity c

ontr

ol o

r ro

utin

e pr

oduc

t tes

ting.

Cla

ssifi

catio

n of

Fie

lds

of S

cien

ce

Lis

ted

belo

w a

re il

lust

rativ

e di

scip

lines

in-

clud

ed in

eng

inee

ring

and

the

vari

ous

fiel

ds o

fsc

ienc

e fo

r w

hich

sep

arat

e da

ta a

re r

eque

sted

inite

ms

I O

tI

1, a

nd 1

3 of

Par

t II

of th

e qu

estio

n-

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

GA

ER

ON

AU

TIC

AL:

AS

TR

ON

AU

TIC

AL.

:C

HE

MIC

AL:

CIV

IL:

ELE

CT

RIC

AL:

ME

CH

AN

ICA

L:M

ET

ALL

UR

GY

AN

DM

AT

ER

IALS

:E

NG

INE

ER

ING

, NE

C:

PH

YS

ICA

L S

CIE

NC

ES

AS

TR

ON

OM

Y:

CH

EM

IST

RY

:

nair

e. C

lass

ific

atio

n of

Fie

lds

of E

mpl

oym

ent

whi

ch is

to h

e us

ed in

cla

ssif

ying

sci

entis

ts a

nden

gine

ers

incl

uded

in P

art 1

, ite

ms

I th

roug

h 6

issh

own

on p

ages

3 a

nd 4

,

Aer

odyn

amic

sA

eros

pace

, spa

ce te

chno

logy

Pet

role

um, p

etro

leum

tufti

ng, p

roce

ssA

rchi

tect

ural

, hyd

raul

ic, h

ydro

logi

c, m

arin

e, s

anita

ry a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal,

stru

ctur

al,

tran

spor

tatio

nC

omm

unic

atio

n, e

lect

roni

c, p

ower

Eng

inee

ring

mec

hani

cs

Cer

amic

, min

ing,

text

ile, w

eldi

ngA

gric

ultu

ral,

indu

stria

l and

man

agem

ent,

nucl

ear,

oce

an e

ngin

eerin

g, s

yste

ms

Labo

rato

ry a

stro

phys

icA

, opt

ical

ast

rono

my,

rad

io a

stro

nom

y, th

eore

tical

ast

roph

ysic

s,xr

ay, g

amm

aray

, neu

trin

o as

tron

omy

Inor

gani

c, o

rgan

omet

allic

, org

anic

, phy

sica

l

Page 182: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

PH

YS

ICS

:A

cous

tics,

ato

mic

and

mol

ecul

ar. c

onde

nsed

mat

ter,

ele

men

tary

par

tMes

, nuc

lear

str

ue-

lure

, opt

ics,

pla

sma

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

SC

IEN

CE

S (

Ter

rest

rial a

nd E

xtra

terr

estr

ial)

AT

MO

SP

HE

RIC

SC

IEN

CE

S:

Aer

onom

y, s

olar

, wea

l her

mod

ilica

t ion

, est

ral

e rr

estr

ial a

tmos

pher

es, m

eteo

rolo

gyG

EO

LOG

ICA

L S

CIE

NC

ES

:E

ngin

eerin

g ge

ophy

sics

, gen

eral

geo

logy

, geo

desy

and

gra

vity

, geo

mag

netis

m, h

ydro

logy

,in

orga

nic

geoc

hem

istr

y, is

otop

ic g

eoch

emis

try,

org

anic

geo

chem

istr

y, la

b ge

ophy

sics

,pa

lcom

agne

tism

, pal

eont

olog

y, p

hysi

cal g

eogr

aphy

am

t car

togr

aphy

, sci

s,.

logy

, soi

lsc

ie n

oes

Che

mic

al o

cean

ogra

phy.

geo

logi

cal o

cean

ogra

phy.

phys

ical

ocea

nogr

aphy

,, m

arin

ege

ophy

sics

Of'l

EA

NO

GR

AP

I IV

:

MA

TH

EM

AT

ICS

Alg

ebra

, ana

lysi

s, a

pplie

d m

athe

mat

ics,

com

pute

r sc

ienc

e, fo

unda

tions

and

logi

c, g

eom

.el

ry,

num

eric

al a

naly

sis,

sta

tistic

s, to

polo

gy

LIF

E S

CIE

NC

ES

BIO

LOG

ICA

L:

CLI

NIC

AL.

ISH

ED

ICA

;.:

PS

YC

HO

LOG

YB

IOLO

GIC

AL

AS

PE

CT

S:

SO

CIA

L A

SP

EC

TS

:

SO

CIA

L S

CIE

NC

ES

EC

ON

OM

ICS

:

Pot

.rric

i\L S

CIE

NC

E:

SO

CIO

LOG

Y:

SO

CIA

L S

CIE

NC

ES

, NE

C:

OT

HE

R S

CIE

NC

ES

, NE

C

Ana

tom

y, a

nim

al s

cien

ces,

bac

terio

logy

, bio

chem

istr

y, b

ioge

ogra

phy,

bio

logi

cal o

ccan

og-

rallY

, bio

phys

ics,

eco

logy

, em

bryo

logy

, ent

omol

ogy,

evo

lutio

nary

bio

logy

, gen

etic

s,im

mun

olog

y, m

icro

biol

ogy,

nut

ritio

n an

d m

etab

olis

m, p

aras

itolo

gy, p

atho

logy

, pha

rma-

colo

gy, p

hysi

cal a

nthr

opol

ogy,

phy

siol

ogy,

pla

nt s

cien

ces,

rad

iobi

olog

y, s

yste

mat

ics

Inte

rnal

med

icin

e, n

euro

logy

, oph

thal

mol

ogy,

pre

vent

ive

med

ichi

e an

d pu

blic

hea

lth,

psyc

hiat

ry, r

adio

logy

, sur

gery

, vet

erin

ary

med

icin

e, d

entis

try,

phy

sica

l med

icin

e an

dre

habi

litat

ion,

pha

rmac

y, p

odia

try

!Exp

erim

enta

l psy

chol

ogy,

ani

mal

beh

av,o

r, c

linic

al p

sych

olog

y, c

ompa

rativ

e ps

ycho

logy

,et

holo

gyS

ocia

l psy

chol

ogy;

edu

catio

nal,

pers

onne

l, vo

catio

nal p

sych

olog

y an

d te

stin

g; in

dust

rial

and

engi

neer

ing

psyc

holo

gy; d

evel

opm

ent a

nd p

erso

nalit

y

Eco

nom

etric

% a

nd e

anom

ie s

tatis

tics;

his

tory

or

econ

omic

thou

ght;

inte

rnat

iona

l tw

o-no

mIc

s; in

dust

rial,

labo

r an

d ag

ricul

tura

l eco

nom

ics;

mac

roec

onom

ics;

mic

roec

onom

ics;

publ

ic fi

nanc

e an

d fis

cal p

olic

y; th

eory

; eco

nom

ic s

yste

ms

and

deve

lopm

ent

Are

a or

reg

iona

l stu

dies

, com

para

tive

gove

rnm

ent,

hist

ory

of p

oliti

cal i

deas

, Int

erna

tiona

lre

latio

ns a

nd la

w, n

atio

nal,

polit

ical

and

lega

l sys

tem

s; p

oliti

cal t

heor

y, p

ublic

adm

inis

-tr

atio

nC

ompa

rativ

e an

d hi

stor

ical

, com

plex

org

anie

ut io

ns, c

ultu

re a

nd s

ocia

l str

uctu

re, d

enio

why

, gro

up in

tera

ctio

ns, s

ocia

l pro

blem

s an

d so

cial

wel

fare

, soc

iolo

gica

l the

ory

Ant

hrop

e'ne

y, h

isto

ry, l

ingu

istic

s, s

acio

econ

omie

geo

grap

hy, a

nd r

esea

rch

in e

duca

tion

To

be 1

4 ..

only

whe

n, m

ultid

isci

plin

ary

and

inte

rdis

cipl

inar

y as

pect

% m

ake

it im

poss

ible

to c

lass

ify th

e pr

ojec

t or

empl

oym

ent u

nder

one

prim

ary

field

.

Item

7. C

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

lybu

dget

ed r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent,

by s

ourc

eof

fund

s, 1

969-

70.

Sou

rce

of fu

nds

refe

rs to

imm

edia

te s

ourc

esra

ther

than

ulti

mat

e so

urce

s of

fund

s co

ncer

ned.

For

exa

mpl

e, fu

nds

rece

ived

by

your

inst

itutio

nfr

om a

foun

datio

n sh

ould

be

repo

rted

und

erth

at s

ourc

e. e

ven

if in

dust

ry w

as th

e or

igin

also

urce

of s

ome

or a

ll of

the

foun

datio

n's

fund

s.U

nder

Fed

eral

Go.

,ern

men

t (ite

m 7

a) in

-cl

ude

gran

ts a

nd c

ontr

acts

ear

mar

ked

for

re-

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent b

y al

l age

ncie

s of

the

inst

itutio

n to

be

perf

orm

ed b

y ot

her

orga

niza

-tio

ns. Und

er S

tate

gov

ernm

ent (

item

7b)

incl

ude

fund

s de

sign

ated

(or

R&

D .b

y th

e S

tate

gov

ern-

men

t and

its

agen

cies

.U

nder

Loc

al g

over

nmen

t (ite

m 7

c) in

clud

efu

nds

desi

gnat

ed fo

r R

&D

by

coun

ty, m

unic

ipal

,or

oth

er lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts a

nd th

eir

agen

cies

.U

nder

Fou

ndat

ions

(ite

m 7

d) in

clud

e gr

abts

and

eont

ract

s,ea

rmar

ked

for

R&

D b

y no

npro

fitph

ilant

hrop

ic fo

unda

tions

and

trus

ts n

ot a

ffili-

ated

with

you

r in

stitu

tion,

suc

h us

the

Car

negi

e,,

o n

(

Page 183: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

CLI

NIC

AL

ME

DIC

'Al.:

PS

YC

HO

LOG

YB

IOLO

GIC

M A

SP

IK"I

'S:

SO

CIA

L A

SP

EC

IS:

SO

CIA

L S

CIE

NC

ES

EC

ON

OM

ICS

:

PO

LIT

ICA

L S

CIE

NC

E:

SO

CIO

LOG

Y:

SO

CIA

L S

CIE

NC

ES

, NE

C:

OT

HE

R S

CIE

NC

ES

, NE

C

lilt

I), M

) 1)

.0k%

, l S

t) U

p:),

v11

11),

)i)i

t:,

ell

Milt

) O

p , C

U I

I11

1.11

1.10

'II'op

,to

. ncm

s.im

mun

olog

y, m

icro

biol

ogy,

nut

ritio

n an

d m

etab

olis

m, p

aras

itolo

gy, p

atho

logy

, pha

rma

colo

gy, p

hysi

cal a

nthr

opol

ogy,

phy

siol

ogy,

pla

nt s

cien

ces,

rad

iold

olog

y, ,y

stem

atic

sIn

tern

al m

edic

ine,

neu

rolo

gy, o

phlin

lmol

ogy,

pre

vent

ive

med

icin

e an

d pu

blic

hea

lth,

psyc

hiat

ry, r

adio

logy

. sur

gery

, vet

erin

ary

med

icin

e, d

enti.

try,

phy

sica

l med

icin

e an

dre

habi

litat

ion,

pha

rmac

y, p

odia

try

ExP

erill

ivIll

al P

kYeh

olog

y, a

nim

al b

ehav

ior,

clin

ical

psy

chol

ogy,

com

para

live

psy

chol

ogy,

etho

logy

Soc

ial p

sych

olog

y; e

duca

tiona

l, pe

rson

nel,

voca

tiona

l psy

chol

ogy

and

test

ing;

indu

stria

lan

ti en

gine

erin

g P

sych

olog

y; d

evel

opm

ent a

nd p

erso

nalit

y

Eco

nom

etric

s an

d ec

onom

ic s

tatis

tics:

his

tory

or

econ

omic

thou

ght:

inte

rnat

iona

l ow

'ni

nnie

s; in

dust

rial,

labo

r an

d ag

ricul

tura

l eco

nom

ics;

mac

roec

onom

ics;

mic

roec

onom

ics;

publ

ic li

nanc

e an

d fis

cal p

olic

y; th

eory

; es.

onom

ic s

yste

ms

and

deve

lopm

ent

Are

a or

reg

iona

l stu

dies

, com

para

tive

gove

rnm

ent,

hist

ory

or p

oliti

cal i

deas

, int

erna

tiona

lre

latio

ns a

nd la

w, n

atio

nal,

polit

ical

and

lega

l sys

tem

s; p

oliti

cal t

heor

y, p

ublic

adm

inis

trill

ion

Com

para

tive

and

hist

oric

al, c

ompl

ex o

rgan

izat

ions

, cul

ture

and

soc

ial s

truc

ture

, dem

ogro

pily

, gro

up in

tera

ctio

ns, s

ocia

l pro

blem

s an

d so

cial

wel

fare

, soc

iolo

gica

l the

ory

Ant

hrop

olog

y, h

isto

ry, l

ingu

istic

s, s

ocke

cono

mic

geo

grap

hy, a

nd r

esea

rch

in e

duca

tion

To

be u

sed

only

whe

n m

ultid

isci

plin

ary

and

inte

rdis

cipl

inar

y as

pect

s m

ake

it im

poss

ible

to c

lass

ify th

e pr

ojec

t or

empl

oym

ent u

nder

one

prim

ary

flea

ltem

7. C

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

lybu

dget

ed r

esea

rch

and

deve

lopm

ent,

by s

ourc

eof

fund

s, 1

969-

70.

Sou

rce

of fu

nds

refe

rs to

imm

edia

te s

ourc

esra

ther

than

ulti

mat

e so

urce

s of

fund

s co

ncer

ned.

For

exa

mpl

e, fu

nds

rece

ived

by

your

inst

itutio

nfr

om a

foun

datio

n sh

ould

be

repo

rted

und

erth

at s

ourc

e, e

ven

if in

dust

ry w

as th

e or

igin

also

urce

of s

onic

or

all o

f the

foun

datio

n's

fund

s.U

nder

Fede

ral G

over

nmen

t(it

em 7

a) in

-cl

ude

gran

ts a

nd c

ontr

acts

ear

mar

ked

for

re-

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent b

y al

l age

ncie

s of

the

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent.

In r

epor

ting

Fed

eral

fund

sfo

r re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent,

incl

ude

thos

eF

eder

al fu

nds

chan

nele

d th

roug

h S

tate

age

ncie

s.E

xclu

de R

&D

con

trac

ts s

ubco

ntra

cted

by

your

Inst

itutio

n to

be

perf

orm

ed b

y ot

her

orga

niza

-tio

ns. Und

er S

tate

gove

rnm

ent

(item

7b)

incl

ude

fund

s de

sign

ated

for

R&

D b

y th

e S

tate

gov

ern-

men

t and

its

agen

cies

.U

nder

Loc

al g

over

nmen

t(it

em 7

c) in

clud

efu

nds

desi

gnat

ed fo

r R

&D

by

coun

ty, m

unic

ipal

,or

oth

er lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts a

nd th

eir

agen

cies

.U

nder

Foun

datio

ns (

item

7d)

incl

ude

gran

tsan

d co

ntra

cts

earm

arke

d fo

r R

&D

by

nonp

rofit

phila

nthr

opic

foun

datio

ns a

nd tr

usts

not

affi

li-at

ed w

ith y

our

inst

itutio

n, s

uch

as th

e C

arne

gie,

For

d,K

resg

e,or

Roc

kefe

ller

Fou

ndat

ions

.F

unds

from

foun

datio

ns w

hich

are

affi

liate

dw

ith, o

r gr

ant s

olel

y to

, you

r in

stitu

tion,

sho

uld

be in

clud

ed u

nder

Inst

itutio

n's

own

And

s.

Page 184: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

Und

er V

o lu

ntar

y he

alth

age

ncie

s (it

em 7

e)in

clud

e gr

ants

and

con

trac

ts s

peci

fied

for

R&

Dby

vol

unta

ry h

ealth

age

ncie

s, s

uch

as th

e A

mer

-ic

an C

ance

r S

ocie

ty a

nd th

e A

mer

ican

Hea

rtA

ssoc

iatio

n. F

unds

spe

cific

ally

des

igna

ted

for

R&

D a

nd d

eriv

ed fr

om a

hea

lth a

genc

y th

at is

aun

it of

a S

tate

or

loca

l gov

ernm

ent s

houl

d be

repo

rted

und

er S

tate

or

loca

l gov

ernm

ent.

Fun

dsfr

om p

rofe

ssio

nal s

ocie

ties

such

us

the

Am

eric

anM

edic

al A

ssoc

iatio

n an

d th

e A

mer

ican

Den

tal

Ass

ocia

tion

shou

ld b

e re

port

ed u

nder

Oth

erso

urce

s.U

nder

indu

stry

(incl

udin

gtr

ade

asso

cia-

tions

) (it

em 7

1')

incl

ude

all g

rant

s an

d co

ntra

cts

allo

cate

dto

R&

D b

y pr

ofitm

akin

g or

gani

za-

tions

, whe

ther

eng

aged

in p

rodu

ctio

n, d

istr

ibu-

tion,

res

earc

h, s

ervi

ce, o

r ot

her

activ

ities

..Do

not

incl

ude

gran

ts a

nd c

ontr

acts

from

non

prof

itfo

unda

tions

fina

nced

by

indu

stry

, whi

ch s

houl

dbe

rep

orte

d un

der

Fou

ndat

ions

.U

nder

inst

itutio

n is

ow

n lim

as (

item

7g)

in-

clud

e an

y fu

nds

whi

ch th

e in

stitu

tion

was

free

to d

esig

nate

f'or

R&

D a

nd w

hich

wer

e in

fact

so

budg

eted

. The

sou

rces

of t

hese

fund

s m

ay in

-cl

ude

endo

wm

ent i

ncom

e: tu

ilon

and

fees

:ge

nera

l-pur

pose

Sta

teor

loca

lgo

vern

men

tap

prop

riatio

ns; a

nd g

ener

al-p

urpo

se g

rant

s fr

omin

dust

ry, f

ound

atio

ns, h

ealth

age

ncie

s or

oth

erou

tsid

eso

urce

s,pr

ovid

edth

ese

wer

eun

re-

stric

ted

fund

s an

d w

ere

utili

zed

by y

our

inst

itu-

tion,

for

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

R&

D, A

lso

incl

ude

in it

em 7

g al

l cos

ts in

curr

ed in

the

perf

orm

ance

of s

epar

atel

y bu

dget

ed R

&D

pro

ject

s ca

rrie

d ou

tun

der

Fed

eral

or

non-

Fed

eral

spo

nsor

ship

that

wer

e de

fray

ed b

y yo

ur in

stitu

tion

out o

f its

ow

nfu

nds,

incl

udin

g co

sts

defr

ayed

in a

ccor

danc

ew

ith c

ost-

shar

ing

arra

ngem

ents

.U

nder

Oth

er s

ourc

es (

item

7h)

rep

ort a

nyad

ditio

nal f

unds

rec

eive

d fr

om o

utsi

de s

ourc

eot

her

than

thos

e al

read

y no

ted,

and

whi

ch w

ere

earm

arke

d fo

r R

&D

by

the

sour

ce. E

xam

ples

in-

'elu

de g

ifts,

gra

nts,

or

cont

ract

s re

ceiv

ed fr

ompr

ivat

e in

divi

dual

s or

pro

fess

iona

l soc

ietie

s, a

ndde

sign

ated

for

R&

D b

y th

em.

hem

8. T

otal

and

fede

rally

fina

nced

cur

rent

expe

nditu

res

for

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

rese

arch

and

deve

lopm

ent,

by m

ajor

cos

t ite

m. 1

969-

70.

The

pur

pose

of t

his

ques

tion

is to

obt

ain

aco

st b

reak

dow

n of

the

curr

ent e

xpen

ditu

res

asso

ciat

ed w

ith th

e pe

rfor

man

ce o

f res

earc

h an

dde

velo

pmen

t at y

our

inst

itutio

n. F

or e

ach

of th

eco

st it

ems

for

whi

ch s

epar

ate

data

are

req

uest

ed,

indi

cate

the

amou

nt fu

nded

by

the

Fed

eral

Gov

-

ernm

ent (

colu

mn

2). T

he to

tal s

how

n in

8d

(col

umn

I) s

houl

d be

the

sam

e as

the

tota

ls in

item

7i a

nd it

em 9

d (c

olum

nI )

. Sim

ilarly

. the

tota

l sho

wn

for

Fed

eral

Gov

ernm

ent i

n ite

m 8

d(c

olum

n 2)

sho

uld

be th

e sa

me

as to

tals

in it

em7a

and

in it

em 9

d (c

olum

n 2)

.In

item

8a.

rep

ort d

irect

sal

arie

s an

d w

ages

char

ged

to s

epar

atel

y bu

dget

ed R

&D

acc

otin

ts o

fyo

ur in

stitu

tion.

Incl

ude

cost

s of

ben

efits

onl

yw

here

they

can

be

dire

ctly

attr

ibut

ed to

the

cost

sof

sep

arat

ely

budg

eted

res

earc

h an

d de

velo

pmen

t:ot

herw

ise,

incl

ude

such

cos

ts u

nder

item

8c,

indi

-re

ct c

osts

rei

mbu

rsed

or

reim

burs

able

.In

item

8b,

repo

rtal

lex

pend

iture

s fo

rm

ater

ials

and

exp

enda

ble

equi

pmen

t.In

item

be,

rep

ort a

ll in

dire

ct (

over

head

)co

sts

attr

ibut

able

to s

epar

atel

y bu

dget

ed R

&D

expe

nditu

res

whi

ch w

ere

reim

burs

ed o

r w

ill b

ere

imbu

rsed

by

the

spon

sorin

g or

gani

zatio

n. D

ono

t inc

lude

any

indi

rect

cos

ts in

curr

ed w

hich

wer

e ho

t rei

mbu

rsed

and

tell/

not

be

reim

burs

ed.

nem

9. T

otal

and

fede

rally

fina

nced

cur

rent

expe

nditu

res

f'or

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

rese

arch

and

deve

lopm

ent,

by ty

pe o

f R&

D a

ctiv

ity,

1969

-70.

Typ

es o

f R&

D a

ctiv

ity fo

r w

hich

sep

arat

eda

ta a

re r

eque

sted

(ba

sic

rese

arch

, app

lied

re-

sear

ch, a

nd d

evel

opm

ent)

are

def

ined

on

page

.7of

the

Inst

ruct

ions

.It

is r

ecog

nize

d th

at y

our

reco

rds

may

not

yie

ld e

xact

figu

res

on a

mou

nts

expe

ndeu

for

each

of t

he th

ree

cate

gorie

s. In

such

cas

es r

easo

nabl

e es

timat

es o

f the

bre

ak-

dow

n w

ill b

e sa

tisfa

ctor

y. T

he to

tals

in it

em 9

dsh

ould

be

the

sam

e as

thos

e in

item

8d.

item

/0. T

otal

and

fede

rally

fina

nced

cur

-re

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

basi

can

dap

plie

dre

sear

ch,

byfie

ldof

sci

ence

.19

69-7

0.In

col

umn

I, in

clud

e al

l cur

rent

exp

endi

-tu

res

for

tota

l sep

arat

ely

budg

eted

res

earc

h. b

yfie

ldof

sci

ence

as

show

n on

pag

es 7

and

8.

whe

ther

suc

h ex

pend

iture

s de

rive

from

out

side

sour

ces

or y

our

inst

itutio

n's

own

fund

s, a

ndw

heth

er fr

om c

ontr

acts

, gra

nts,

gift

s, e

ndow

-m

ents

(in

com

e or

prin

cipa

l). S

tate

and

loca

l gov

-er

nmen

t app

ropr

iatio

ns, o

r ot

her

sour

ces,

pro

-vi

ded

the

fund

s w

ere

sepa

rate

ly b

udge

ted

for

re-

sear

ch a

nd w

ere

expe

nded

inth

e fis

cal y

ear

1969

-70.

Als

o in

clud

e an

y in

dire

ct c

osts

rei

m-

burs

ed o

r re

imbu

rsab

le b

y ou

tsid

e sp

onso

rs o

fre

sear

ch p

roje

cts.

Whe

re it

is n

ot p

ossi

ble

toid

entif

y ex

pend

iture

s fo

r th

e ye

ar, r

ecei

pts

may

be s

ubst

itute

d.

Page 185: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

\-0

Inco

lum

n2.

clas

sify

tota

lse

para

tely

budg

eted

res

earc

h an

ced

by th

e F

eder

al G

ov-

ernm

ent,

by fi

eld

of s

cien

ce.

Tot

als

in it

em 1

0i (

colu

mns

I an

d 2)

sho

uld

equa

l the

sum

of i

tem

s 9a

and

9b

(col

umns

1an

d 2)

.

Sec

tion

EC

urre

nt E

xpen

ditu

res

for

Inst

ruct

ion

and

Dep

artm

enta

l Res

earc

h in

the

Sci

ence

san

d E

ngin

eerin

g

(1:A

pend

iture

s fo

r ca

pita

l equ

ipm

ent a

nd fa

cilit

ies

are

lo b

e ex

clud

ed h

ere

but r

epor

ted

in S

ectio

n F

.)

Fin

anci

al d

ata

requ

este

d in

this

sec

tion

are

inte

nded

to b

e co

nsis

tent

with

dat

a re

port

ed in

U.S

. Offi

ce o

f Edu

catio

n's

Hig

her

Edu

catio

nG

ener

al In

form

atio

n S

urve

y, "

Fin

anci

al S

tatis

-tic

s of

Inst

itutio

ns O

f Hig

her

Mum

tion.

" D

ata

requ

este

d sh

ould

be

deriv

ed fr

om o

r es

timat

edon

the

basi

sof

Cur

rent

-Fun

dsR

even

ue(R

even

ue fo

r E

duca

tion

and

Gen

eral

Pur

pose

s)an

d C

urre

nt -

fund

s E

xpen

ditu

res

(Edu

catio

nal

and

Gen

eral

Exp

endi

ture

s).

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r in

stru

ctio

n an

d de

-pa

rtm

enta

l res

earc

h in

clud

e th

e sa

larie

s of

de-

part

men

t hea

ds, f

acul

ty m

embe

rs, s

ecre

tarie

san

d te

chni

cian

s. o

ffice

and

labo

rato

ry s

uppl

ies,

and

othe

r ex

pens

es. A

ll ex

pend

iture

s in

curr

edfo

r in

stru

ctio

' al p

rogr

ams

in s

cien

ce. a

nd e

ngi-

neer

ing

subj

ects

for

stud

ents

pur

suin

g de

gree

-cr

edit

cour

ses

of s

tudy

whi

ch le

ad g

ener

ally

to a

cert

ifica

te o

r de

gree

sho

uld

be in

clud

ed.

Item

II. C

urre

nt e

xpen

ditu

res

for

inst

ruc-

tion

and

depa

rtm

enta

l res

earc

h in

the

scie

nces

and

engi

neer

ing,

by

field

of s

cien

ce. 1

969-

70.

Rep

ort a

ll cu

rren

t exp

endi

ture

s of

the

in-

stru

ctio

nal d

epar

tmen

ts, c

olle

ges,

and

sch

ools

of

the

inst

itutio

n in

the

scie

nces

and

eng

inee

ring,

by fi

eld

of s

cien

ce, a

s de

scrib

ed o

n pa

ges

7 an

d8.

Item

/2. E

stim

ate

the

dolla

r am

ount

of o

ver-

head

(or

indi

rect

) co

sts

allo

cabl

e to

the

inst

ruc-

tion

and

depa

rtm

enta

l res

earc

hac

tiviti

esre

-po

rted

abo

ve (

item

II )

.

Cur

rent

exp

endi

ture

s fo

r in

stru

ctio

n an

d de

-pa

rtm

enta

l res

earc

hin

the

scie

nces

and

eng

i-ne

erin

g (it

emI I

) re

pres

ent d

irect

exp

endi

ture

sin

curr

ed b

y yo

ur in

stitu

tion

hi c

arry

ing

out

thes

e fu

nctio

ns. T

he p

urpo

se o

f ite

m 1

2 is

toob

tain

an

estim

ate

of th

e ov

erhe

ad o

r in

dire

ctco

sts

asso

ciat

ed w

ith th

ese

dire

ct e

xpen

ditu

res.

Suc

h ov

erhe

ad o

r in

dire

ctco

sts

incl

ude

anap

prop

riate

sha

re o

f the

inst

itutio

n's

expe

ndi-

ture

sfo

rge

nera

lad

min

istr

atio

n,st

uden

tse

rvic

es, l

ibra

ries,

and

the

oper

atio

n an

d m

aint

e-na

nce

of p

hysi

cal p

lant

.

Sec

tion

FC

apita

l Exp

endi

ture

s fo

r S

cien

tific

and

Eng

inee

ring

Fac

ilitie

s an

d E

quip

men

t for

Res

earc

h, D

evel

opm

ent,

and

Inst

ruct

ion

Thi

s se

ctio

n co

vers

cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

scie

ntifi

c an

d en

gine

erin

g fa

cilit

ies

and

equi

p-m

ent f

or r

esea

rch,

dev

elop

men

t, an

d in

stru

ctio

ndu

ring

1969

-70.

Rep

ort f

unds

exp

ende

d du

ring

1969

-70

for

faci

litie

s w

hich

wer

e in

pro

cess

inth

at y

ear

and

For

faci

litie

s w

hich

wer

e co

m-

plet

ed th

at y

ear.

Exp

endi

ture

s fo

r ad

min

istr

a-tio

n bu

ildin

gs, s

team

pla

nts,

res

iden

ce h

alls

, and

othe

r su

ch fa

cilit

ies

shou

ld b

e ex

clud

ed u

nles

sut

ilize

d pr

inci

pally

for

rese

arch

, dev

elop

men

t, or

inst

ruct

ion

in e

ngin

eerin

g or

inth

e sc

ienc

es.

Land

cos

ts s

houl

d be

exc

lude

d.

Fac

ilitie

s an

d eq

uipm

ent e

xpen

ditu

res

in-

clud

e th

e fo

llow

ing:

(a)

fixe

d eq

uipm

ent s

uch

asbu

ilt-in

equ

ipm

ent a

nd fu

rnis

hing

s (h

oods

, fix

edla

bora

tory

tabl

es a

nd b

ench

es, a

nd v

entil

atio

neq

uipm

ent)

; (b)

mov

able

sci

entif

ic e

quip

men

tsu

chas

osc

illos

cope

s, p

ulse

-hei

ght a

naly

zers

,sp

ectr

omet

ers,

and

pla

sma

and

prot

ein

sepa

ra-

tors

; (c)

mov

able

furn

ishi

ngs

such

as

book

case

s,de

sks,

file

cab

inet

s, ta

bles

, and

sim

ple

tool

s; (

d)ar

chite

ct's

fees

, site

wor

k, e

xten

sion

of u

tiliti

es,

and

the

build

ing

cost

s of

ser

vice

func

tions

suc

has

inte

gral

caf

eter

ias

and

book

stor

es o

f a fa

cilit

y;

Page 186: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

and

(e)

spec

ial s

epar

ate

faci

litie

s us

ed to

hou

sesc

ient

ific

appa

ratu

s su

ch a

s hy

pers

onic

tunn

els,

;acc

eler

ator

s, a

nd o

cean

ogra

phic

ves

sels

.

kC

urre

nt-f

und

expe

nditu

ies

for

capi

tal e

quip

-m

ent a

nd fa

cilit

ies

shou

ld b

e re

port

ed in

this

sect

ion

and

shou

ld b

e ex

clud

ed fr

om S

ectio

ns D

and

E. E

xpen

ditu

res

from

pla

nt a

nd o

ther

fund

sfo

r fa

cilit

ies

and

equi

pmen

t sho

uld

likew

ise'

be

incl

uded

in th

is s

ectio

n.

Item

13.

Cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

scie

ntifi

can

d en

gine

erin

g fa

cilit

ies

and

equi

pmen

t for

re-

sear

ch, d

evel

opm

ent,

and

inst

ruct

ion,

by

field

of

scie

nce,

sou

rce

of fu

nds,

and

pur

pose

, 196

9-70

.C

apita

l exp

endi

ture

s sh

ould

be

divi

ded

into

thre

e se

ctio

ns: (

1) a

ll pu

rpos

es, (

2) R

&D

and

grad

uate

inst

ruct

ion,

and

(3)

und

ergr

adua

te in

-st

ruct

ion.

Fur

ther

, cla

ssify

suc

h ex

pend

iture

s by

broa

d fie

lds

of s

cien

ce, a

s fo

llow

s: e

ngin

eerin

g,ph

ysic

al a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal,

mat

hem

atic

s, li

fe,

psyc

holo

gy, s

ocia

l, an

d ot

her

scie

nces

. See

the

inst

ruct

ions

rel

ated

to it

em 7

for

assi

stan

ce in

dist

ribut

ing

capi

tal b

y so

urce

of f

unds

.

Pro

rate

cap

ital e

xpen

ditu

res

for

mul

tipur

-po

se s

truc

ture

s. T

he s

pace

util

ized

for

part

icul

arfu

nctio

ns m

ay b

e us

ed a

s a

guid

e in

pro

ratin

g.T

hus,

if 5

0 pe

rcen

t of t

he to

tal s

quar

e fo

otag

eof

a s

cien

ce b

uild

ing

is a

lloca

ted

to R

&D

and

grad

uate

inst

ruct

ion,

the

rem

aini

ng 5

0 pe

rcen

tto

und

ergr

adua

te in

stru

ctio

n, th

en c

apita

l ex-

pend

iture

s sh

ould

be

dist

ribut

ed a

ccor

ding

ly b

e-tw

een

thes

e tw

o fu

nctio

ns. T

he fo

llow

ing

guid

e-lin

es m

ay b

e he

lpfu

l in

dete

rmin

ing

the

func

-tio

nal u

sage

of s

pace

: (I)

The

term

res

earc

h an

dde

velo

pmen

t (R

&D

) w

as p

revi

ousl

y de

fined

on

page

7 o

f the

Inst

ruct

ions

. Gra

duat

e in

stru

ctio

nis

a c

ours

e of

stu

dy o

ffend

prim

arily

to s

tude

nts

who

hav

e at

tain

ed a

firs

t-le

vel d

egre

e an

d is

de-

sign

ed to

lead

to a

sec

ond-

leve

l or

doct

oral

de-

gree

in a

giv

en fi

eld.

Incl

uded

is p

ostd

octo

ral

educ

atio

n w

hich

is d

efin

ed a

s ad

vanc

ed tr

aini

ngbe

yond

the

Ph.

D. o

r S

c.D

. deg

ree.

as

wel

l as

the

trai

ning

of i

nter

ns a

nd r

esid

ents

. (2)

Und

ergr

ad-

uate

inst

ruct

ion

is a

cou

rse

of s

tudy

des

igne

d to

lead

to r

ue b

ache

lor's

or

first

-pro

fess

iona

l deg

ree

in a

giv

en fi

eld.

Page 187: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

i

I

Other Science Resources Publications

Title

Federal Funds for Research. Development, and Other ScientificActivities, Fiscal Years 1971, 1972, and 1973, Vol. XXI

An Analysis of Federal R&D Funding by Function,. 1963 -73

Scientists, Engineers, and Physicians From Abroad, Trends Through. Fiscal Year 1970

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "Changes in Graduate Pro-grams in Science and Engineering, 1970-72 and 1972-74"

Research and Development in Industry, 1970

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "First-Year, Full -Time Gradu-ate Science Enrollment Continues to Decline"

Unemployment Rates and Employment Characteristics for Scientistsand Engineers, 1971

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "Total Scientific and Techni-cal Personnel in Industry Remains Level, R&D Personnel Lowerin 1970"

NSF

72 -.

72 -.

71,

71,V-.

72 -.

72 -.

72 -.

Scientific Human Resources: Profiles and Issues 72 -.

Papers and Proceedings of a Colloquium on Research and Develop-ment and Economic Growth/Productivity. 72 -.

Federal Funds for Academic Science, Fiscal Year 1970 71-.

Nati,nal Patterns of R&D Resources. Funds and Manpower in the 72 -.

United States, 1953-72

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "Federal Scientific.Techincal.and Health Personnel in 1970" 71-

American Science Manpower, 1970 71 -

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "Enrollment Increase in Sci-ence and Mathematics in Public Secondary Schools, 1948-49 to1969-70" 7I-:

1969 & 1980 Science and Engineering Doctorate Supply & Utiliza-tion 71-

Reviews of Data on Science Resources, No. 20, "Trends in GraduateScience and Engineering, 1960.70" 71-1

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "Secondary School ScienceTeachers (Experience and Employment)" 71-1

Page 188: DOCUMENT RESUME ED 076 160 AUTHOR Biggar, Ronald S ...Acting Study Director. Ronald S. Biggar, Jr., carried out major responsibili-ties during all phases of the survey and in the preparation

1

Title NSF No. Price

Federal Funds for Research,. Development, and Other ScientificActivities, Fiscal Years 1971,1972, and 1973, Vol. XX1 72-317

An Analysis of Federal R&D Funding by Function, 1963-73 72-313 SI.75

Scientists, Engineers, and Physicians From Abroad, Trends ThroughFiscal Year 1970 72 -312 SI .00

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "Changes in Graduate Pro-grams in Science and Engineering, 1970.72 and 1972-74' 72-311

Research and Development in Industry, 1970 72 -309 SI.00

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "First-Year, Full-Time Gradu-ate Science Enrollment Continus to Decline" 72.308

Unemployment Rates and Employment Characteristics for Scientistsand Engineers, 1971 71-307 S1.75

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "Total Scientific and Techni-cal Personnel in Industry Remains Level, R&D Personnel Lowerin 1970" 72.306

Scientific Human Resources: Profiles and Issues 72-304 S0.25

Papers and Proceedings of a Colloquium on Research and Develop-ment and Economic Growth/Productivity. 72.303 $0.75

Federal Funds for Academic Science, Fiscal Year 1970 72-301 $0.70

National Patterns of R&D Resources. Funds and Manpower in the 72-300 S0.50United States, 1953-72

Science Resources Studies Highlights. "Federal Scientific, Technical,apd Health Personnel in 1970" 71-47

American Science Manpower, 1970 71-45 $2.00

Science Resources Studies Highlights. "Enrollment Increase in Sci-ence and Mathematics in Public Secondary Schools, 1948-49 to1969.70" 71-30

1969 & 1980 Science and Engineering Doctorate Supply & Utiliza-tion 71-20 S0.50

Reviews of Data on Science Resources, No. 20, "Trends in GraduateScience and Engineering, 1960-70" 71.15 SO.1 5

Science Resources Studies Highlights, "Secondary School ScienceTeachers (Experience and Employment)" 71-12