doctoral studies in kenya
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
1/18
Doctorate Studies in Kenya:
Issues on Quality
By
Laban P AyiroSenior Lecturer,
Education Leadership And Policy StudiesMoi University
Evelyn Jepkemei
Senior Assistant DirectorKenya Institute Of Education
James SangChief Admin Officer,
Moi University
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
2/18
oc ora e uca on an ua y ssurance :
Theoretical Underpinnings
A highly skilled workforce operating at the frontiers ofknowledge creation and professional practice is key to Kenyas
achievement of the Vision 2030
Expansion of the village: citizen participation, particularly from
underrepresented minority groups, should be a priority in fields
that are essential to our nations success.
Interdisciplinary research preparation and education are
central to future competitiveness because knowledge creation
and innovation frequently occur at the interface of disciplines.
Kenyan Universities must be able to tap and attract thebrightest and best talent globally.
Quality doctoral training is the driver of Kenyan Research
capabilities: success and efforts to evaluate and improve all
aspects of the quality of the doctoral studies must be
advanced and supported in order to foster innovation.
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
3/18
Introduction to study
Doctoral education, the highest level of academic qualification, is the foundation
for the research and development pursuits of a country.
The term doctorate comes from the Latin docere, meaning to teach, which in
turn comes from the Medieval Latin licentia docendi, or the license to teach.
it proclaims that the recipient is worthy of being listened to as an equal by theappropriate university faculty (Phillips and Pugh 2005:20-21). A PhD is therefore as
much about the learning experience as the production of a thesis
There is some demand, for rigid set of guidelines as to what a PhD should entail.
The number of graduates with a PhD qualification in Kenya and other countries has
grown exponentially in recent years and there is still the absence of a yardstick
against which appropriate success can be measured (Burnard 2001: 159).
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
4/18
Quality
The degree of excellence
The relative goodness cannot be described in a subtle wayusing quantitative data
can focus different aspects:
prerequisites, processes, results and effects
is a relative concept
- fitness for purpose
- value for money
will have different concrete meaning depending upon what you
focusHowever quality in this study adopts the meaning applied by
CHE, that is consisting of a synthesis of conformity,adaptability and continuous improvement. It is oftendefined as fitness for purpose and also standard
based.
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
5/18
Purpose of the PhD
PhD is inseparably related to training in research so assessment of the
creative output s includes a judgment in the candidates ability to
conduct independent research
successful research at doctoral level must result in a contribution toknowledge that is realised when it is communicated effectively to othersin the field.
Arguably, the acid test in this dimension might be that others working inthe field need to be able to learn from the creative output if it is to beacceptable as a contribution to knowledge (Jibril 2006).
a doctoral examination typically takes the form of the candidatedefending argument set out in the thesis. a distinction between acreative work that is presented without explanation or critique and onepresented with an attendant critical analysis (Ayiro, 2010)
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
6/18
Quality assurance Issues
Oral examinationo institutions vary in respect of their use of the viva as an essential or non-
essential component of the doctoral examination process
o the quality control of the examination process is its reliability and its fairness.
o the viva enabling the examiners to decide the viability of the intellectual
position and candidates understanding of it through oral, cross-examination
(Green and Powell, 2005).International perspectives
The processes of doctoral study differ across international boundaries that what
may be expected in terms of the actual examination, if not in terms of the
written submission, will also differ (Green and Powell, 2005)
guidance for external examiners would require greater contextualization.
In many European countries, a public defence of the thesis is required, assuringthe originality of the work and ability to defend arguments.
In most of the universities treat the final defence as a board room activity.
Taking an international perspective, it is not a universal requirement for doctoral
candidates to defend their thesis (either in public or in a closed examination) in
order to be awarded the degree.
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
7/18
Methodology
The research was carried over a period of six months,
designed as a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews
( 60 academics and 52 ongoing PhD and PhD graduates were
interviewed from 10 niversities in Kenya)
Secondary sources (relevant international and national
(Kenya) policy documents, and publications,
reports from CHE to generate data.
purposive sampling method was used to identify subjects for
interviews across four academic blocks of the university.
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
8/18
Methodology Data analysis and interpretation was done using the Interactive Model
of Qualitative Data Analysis (Miles and Huberman, 1994).
The data analysis was based on the study themes: context, supervision,
examination and oral defence of the PhD award in Kenya.
The process entailed drawing on institutional policy data concerning
the PhD from 10 Kenyan universities. Second, questionnaires were used
to collect data relating to the PhD award process from four
perspectives
Supervisors ( n=50, 20 women & 25 men )
Candidates ( n=52, 32 women & 20 men )
External Examiners (n=6, 2 women & 4men )
Examination Board members ( n=4, 1 man & 3women)
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
9/18
Methodology The four questionnaires were tailored to the respondent
groups, although the format of the questionnaires wasbroadly the same.
Information was ascertained relating to: background (gender, age, experience); selection of supervisors; thesupervision; selection of examiners; oral defence panelselection; vivas procedures; outcomes; perceptions ofthe purpose (s) of the viva; and for candidates, theirexpectations and experiences of the PhD process.
The questionnaires to candidates focussed primarily ontheir own PhD path.
The questionnaires to the lecturers focused primarily onthe PhD that they had supervised and examined mostrecently in Kenya.
1/2/2014
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
10/18
Findings (Context )
Despite the institutionalisation of PhD training in Kenyan Universities, and the apparent serious attentionfor the quality of supervision, PhD studies still face many problems in most of the universities (Kiamba,
For example, the percentage of non-completion is regarded as too high
there is a very long process towards completion, often more than six years, instead of the expectedfour years.
Furthermore fifty percent (50%) of the candidates and the supervisors identified the fact that therewas no contact with peers and the existence of parochial local research cultures as a runningimpediment. Lack of motivation, psychological stress due to isolation, feelings of uselessness and lackof possibilities to participate in a vibrant research culture was captured for both lecturers and students
at forty and seventy two percent (40% &72%) respectively.
Systemic issues also affect the quality of the awards of the PhD in universities in Kenya. The academic
staff raised the issue of uncontrolled growth of doctoral student numbers and the corresponding lack
of supervision capacity.
The students further felt that supervisors did not give due attention to planning and keeping within
time limits and exhibited lack of support for publishing beyond the PhD Thesis.
All these concerns and shortcomings no doubt bring to surface the need to amplify the quality
imperatives in the award of the PhD qualification.
It was stated that the supervisor training was nonexistent,
The examination board members said that appointed supervisors seldom have a conceptual map of
what constitutes acceptable supervision.
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
11/18
n ngs uperv s on an
Examinations)
Forty eight percent (48%) of the PhD candidates interviewed regard the PhDperiod of their life as a lonely and stressful episode, and without a mentor withwhom to discuss problems.
Both the students and lecturers admit that there is a host of supervision problems.
Lack of a criteria for selecting and training supervisors
meetings were inadequate and lacked depth, and often there were no regularperformance and progress reports.
lack of adequate research funding, and financial arrangements are unclear ornon-existent.
PhD supervision was a stressful and frustrating experience coupled with the factthat completed PhDs often have a low utilization return and so may be regardedas a rather wasteful way of spending research time and money.
poor research design,
lack of focus and
inadequate conceptualization of the research question by both parties.
strained relationship, and not aware of others working in the same field of studiesas one of the constraints.
Indeed it is reasonable to postulate that supervisors themselves are often theproducts of poor supervision, and do not therefore hold experience of whatconstitutes competent supervision.
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
12/18
Findings (Admission and method of study)
Most students have admitted have degrees below second class lower division)
Inadequate research background and lack of training in methodological and
writing skills (inadequate Bachelors and Masters training) were seen by eighty eight
percent (88%) of both the ongoing and graduated students as a major area of
difficulty.
problematic research facilities (time, office, computer, assistance, flexibility in rules,
under-funding of essential tasks), many competing tasks (teaching, consultancies,
family life) and bad planning along with poor time management as hindrances.
Sixty three percent (63%) of the supervisors conceded that there were majorproblems with writing academic English on the part of the students.
In addition, sixty four percent (64%) of both ongoing and graduated PhDcandidates complained about infrequent meetings with supervisors as well as notenough specific knowledge among supervisors with regard to the candidatesresearch topic.
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
13/18
Findings (Defense)o Kenyan universities vary in degree of openness of the PhD oral defence. four have public
defences, five have private or relatively private ones.
o not all Kenyan dissertation defences are public. As a result, students at universities
conducting private dissertation defenses may be less informed about this examination
than those at universities having a more open system.o the universities differ in details of the criteria for the choice of the external examiner,
especially regarding impartiality.
o At four universities (Kenyatta, Nairobi JKUAT & Maseno), the external examiners
opinion on the dissertation significantly influences the committees final decision.
o In contrast, the external examiner seems to have less power at Moi and Egerton. At some
of the universities, the external examiners opinion is not permitted to unduly influence
the committees decision.
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
14/18
Discussion and conclusion
procedure that revolves around the selection of new doctoral students (CHE2006) needs attention.
From our findings it is evident that admission criteria in most of the Kenyan
Universities is not stringent resulting in the admission of candidates for the
PhD lacking the ambition for withstanding the rigours of doctoral studies
(Adu and Orivel 2006). problems of supervision are compounded when the PhD student is clearly not
well-suited for advanced study at the level of the doctorate.
adopt as a best practice by Kenyan universities the use of a combination of
personal interviews, academic records and samples of formal writing in
making selection decisions, so as to bring into the supervision pool studentswho are supervisable(Jibril 2006).
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
15/18
Discussion and Conclusion
set up the criteria for the selection of supervisors, for poorsupervisors have been seen to be a major factor instudent completion rates, the quality of the thesis andthe overall supervision experience by student andsupervisor alike.
provide formal training for new and promising supervisors
on the technical, ethical, personal, legal, administrativeand professional aspects of supervision be taken onboard by the Kenyan Universities.
it should be standard procedure that faculty requires thedefense of a full PhD proposal at the end of the firstacademic year, this event would then determinewhether the student will be able to continue or not in thePhD programme; it will also bring to the fore problems ofinadequate supervision (Shabani 2006).
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
16/18
Discussion and Conclusion
having universities prepare an updateable Handbook for Supervision within therelevant department or faculty, so that every supervisor - and student - is aware
of, and familiar with, the often complex administrative regulations, requirements
and deadlines that accompany this process should be considered by the
Kenyan universities (Brossard and Foko 2006).
use a system of mentors to guide new PhD candidates (Materu 2006). It will be
important to have a requirement of at least two international examiners toreview and evaluate a completed thesis; these examiner reports should form
part of the annual evaluation of the capacity of supervisors and of quality
supervision within a School or Faculty or university.
A thesis must be satisfactory as regards literary style and presentation. It must
show that candidates have understood the nature and purpose of the
investigations, are sufficiently acquainted with the relevant literature, have
mastered the methods of research appropriate to the topic and their
application, and are capable of assessing the significance of their findings.
A Doctor of Philosophy thesis must constitute original researchand is expected
to make an original contribution to the field(Maxwell, 2005).
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
17/18
Quality is theSum of Many Parts
-
8/13/2019 Doctoral Studies in Kenya
18/18
Thank You!