doc.: ieee 802.11-03/572r0 submission mar 10-14, 2003 mark cummings, rfcoslide 1 the status of...

25
Mar 10-14, 2003 Mark Cummings, RFco Slide 1 doc.: IEEE 802.11- 03/572r0 Submission The Status of Software Defined Radios and SDR Forum Activities July 2003 Senior Vice President Strategic Development, RFco, Chairman of the Board of Directors, SDR Forum Special Advisor, IEICE Software Radio Study Group +1 408 866 8086 X226 [email protected]

Upload: noel-whitehead

Post on 28-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 1

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

The Status of Software Defined Radios and SDR Forum Activities

July 2003

Senior Vice President Strategic Development, RFco,Chairman of the Board of Directors, SDR Forum

Special Advisor, IEICE Software Radio Study Group+1 408 866 8086 [email protected]

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 2

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Definition

• Software control of:– Modulation– Frequency– Power

• Aftermarket software

• Possibly, third party software

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 3

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

SDR Benefits

• Increased compatibility between dissimilar standards

• Eases technology insertion and generational changes– Allows incremental deployment and upgrade

• Hardware and software can evolve separately– Potentially enables third party HW/SW

• May reduce number of waveforms (and if it doesn’t, it will make them easier to cope with)

• Shorter time to market; fewer hardware platforms in inventory

• Significantly reduces impact of software bugs

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 4

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Cost of Software “Bug” Fixes – A Real Example• Examples of recent recalls of one manufacturer’s commercial wireless

phones:– February 2001 - Network operator 1: 420,000 phones recalled

(software problem)– May 2001 - Network operator 2: 126,000 phones recalled (software

problem)– July 2001 - Network operator 2: 560,000 phones (design flaw)

• Cost estimate of handset recalls - an example: – Manufacturer’s estimate for cost of recall: $95 M– Independent analyst’s estimate of cost of recall: $160 M

• Cost per terminal of the recall: $115 per terminal

From J. Hoffmeyer, Panasonic

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 5

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Moore’s Law Marches On

Then

8 lb bag

Car battery

Only in Chicago

$1k

Then

3.5 MHz

128 Kb

10 MB

$4k

Now

4 oz

3 days on a charge

Multiple systems

Free

Personal Computer Cell Phone

Now

3 GHz

128 Mb

60 GB

$1k

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 6

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Historical Perspective• 50 years ago wireless systems were entirely hard wired analog components

comprising:

– Ant - Antenna– RFFE - Radio Frequency Front End– (A/D) - Analog / Digital Converter– HSSP - High Speed Signal Processing– LSSP - Low Speed Signal Processing– PS - Protocol Stack– LC - Local Control– HI - Human Interface

• As digital technology has matured, analog discrete components have been replaced first with digital discretes and then with integrated circuits (IC’s) and software

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 7

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Base Band Enabling Technology • Reconfigurable Logic solutions coming to market such as:

– General Purpose Reconfigurable Logic Processor solutions• FPGA solutions

– Xilinx– Altera– Others

• Application Specific solutions– Infineon acquiring Morphics– Motorola announcing product based on Morpho– Quicksilver announcing product– Continuing stream of new entrants such as Gate Change

• General purpose processor software solutions being developed

– Such as Vanu• Multimode ASIC solutions continuing development

– TI– Others

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 8

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

HIANTRF

A/D HSSP

LSSPPS LC

Wireless System= Standard H/W Platform w/ S/W & Reusable IP = Discrete Hardwired Logic

IN THE PIPLINE

TODAY

The Ether

The User

Completion of Sub-System Evolution Completion of Sub-System Evolution

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 9

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Past

Present

Future

The User

HIANTRF

A/D HSSP

LSSPPS LC

The Ether

Focus of SDR in Early 1990’s

See: “FPGA in The Software Radio”, by Mark Cummings & Shinichiro Haruyama; IEEE Communications Magazineand: http://sdrforum.org

Early 1990’s Evolution of SDR Early 1990’s Evolution of SDR

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 10

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Advances in Enabling Technology

• Reconfigurable logic– High speed DSPs– FPGAs– Proprietary logic

• A/D– Low power – High bit rate– Fast

• Software– Portable/reuseable software-- CORBA, Java

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 11

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

The Open Systems Challenge• Open systems are based on published subsystem and component interfaces

allowing for– Maximum innovation within subsystems and components– Maximum ability to integrate subsystems and components from

optimal sources• Open Systems are the best mechanism to achieve the full social benefits of

SDR• Some industry participants oppose Open Systems

– Seek to retain perceived advantage– There really is no advantage

• Direct regulation of subsystem and component interfaces is – Limited by regulatory charters– Efforts to extend charters have in the past proven to be counter

productive• Regulators should

– Recognize limits of their charters– Use their influence to strongly encourage Open Systems

approaches

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 12

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Current Status of Antennas for SDR• Multi-mode multi-band antennas are coming to market

– Multiple bands• Such as triple band GSM

– Multiple modes• Cellular, WLAN, GPS...

• Characteristics

– Small• Low profile• Imbedded

– High performance– Low cost

• Examples of vendors include:

– SkyCross– eTenna

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 13

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

SDR Product Availability

• Military Products (base, mobile, portable, handheld) are available now– Less sensitive to: size constraints, power limitations; antenna

real estate• Commercial Base Stations are available now

– Similar criteria as military products• Commercial Handheld units coming soon

– Public Safety– Commercial Wireless ??

Public Safety

CommercialMilitary

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Regulatory Environment

• US FCC– Report and Order on Class 3 permissive

changes and electronic labeling– Workshop on cognitive radio technology May

03

• UK Radiocommunication Agency international workshop September 03

• Download security proposal from Japan

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 15

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Remaining challenges• Regulatory environment

– Universal regulatory environment to promote global circulation of handsets

• Antennas– Efficient, broadband, small

• AD Converters– Faster, cheaper, more power efficient

• Download security– Critical element

• Batteries/power usage– Size and weight are important

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 16

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

What is the SDR Forum’s role?

• A venue to discuss common problems and to promote industry standards without raising issues of collusion

• Regulators’ resource for industry opinion to facilitate creation of rules to ease global circulation

• Create concepts and influence standards for implementation

• Industry water cooler or chat room-- it’s a place to learn about the state of the art

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 17

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Members Composition By Global Region

52%

21%27%

ITU Region 1 - “Europe"

ITU Region 2 - “Americas”

ITU Region 3 - “Asia-Pacific”

Region 2

Region 3 Region 1

As of 19 Jan 03

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 18

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Liaison Activities

ITU

Formal (member)

Dedicated Forum Resources

OMGFormal

Byproduct of common members

NPSTC

Informal

Byproduct of SDRF members

OMA

Formal (Associate)

Byproduct of common members

Mobile VCE

Formal

Overlap of interest

Regulators

Informal

Via Regulatory Advisory Group/Direct SDRF Interaction

IEICE

Informal

Overlap of interest/byproduct of common members

JCP

Formal (future)

Byproduct of common members

SDRForum

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 19

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Activities of the SDR Forum• Standards Recommendations

– FCC Report and Order on Software Defined Radios– Download Security Report – Java-based SCA Reference Implementation– ITU Recommendation

• Market Survey – Survey report by Gartner Group last year– Update this year

• Reports and Publications– Download Definitions (DL-DFN)– More to be released this year

• Roadmap and workplan• Seminars, Workshops, Expositions• Liaison with other international organizations

– MVCE, MExE, 3GPP, EC/TCAM, IEICE, ITU, OMA, etc

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 20

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

SDR Forum Workshops and Conference

• International Technical Conference and Product Expo

• Co-sponsored MPHPT workshop with IEICE Study Group

• Workshop on Reconfigurable Logic

• Workshop on Smart Antennas

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 21

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Meetings and Working Methods • Five Major Meetings Per Year

– January - Winter Meeting, generally held in North America– January 2003 San Jose

– April - Spring Meeting, generally held in Asia-Pacific region– April 2003 Singapore/Tokyo

– June - Summer Meeting, generally held in North America– June 2003 Chicago

– September - Fall Meeting, generally held in Europe– September 2003 Paris

– November - Annual Business Meeting, generally held in North America– November 2003(Technical Conference) Orlando

• Interim Committee or Working Group Meetings as Required– Globally as appropriate

• Conference Calls– Globally as appropriate

• Electronic Working Methods– E-mail, reflectors, website…..

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 22

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Technical Committee(Dr. John BARD – Space Coast Communications)

• Implementation Perspectives R&D Working Group–

Identify technologies to fulfill needs of marketplace Software Communication Architecture Reference Implementation Group

Review and evaluate reference architecture implementation• Application Perspectives

Commercial Handset Working GroupDefine concepts and APIs for commercial terminals

Hardware Adaptation Layer Working GroupIdentify architectures and functions to support reconfigurable radios

Commercial Download Working GroupStudy technical aspects of over-the-air software download to change operating

characteristics System Interface Working Group

Identify, maintain, and promote standards for services and interfaces

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 23

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Regulatory CommitteeRichard Shrum

• SDR Interface with Regulatory Agencies– MPHPT (Japan)– RegTP/TCAM Germany)– FCC (US)– Industry Canada– Radio Research Lab (South Korea)– Radiocommunications Agency (UK)– IDA (Singapore)

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 24

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

SDR Forum Websitehttp://www.sdrforum.org

• Public Area– General Forum information– Meeting information– Selected documents (including 2003 Unified Workplan)

• Member Area– ID and Password required to access– Reports and other deliverables– Used for committee and working group

• Email reflectors• Completed work• Work in “ballot” review• Work in progress

• Links of Interest– General info– Member company links

Mar 10-14, 2003

Mark Cummings, RFcoSlide 25

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/572r0

Submission

Summary• SDR technology is beyond the education and initiation

phase.

• The SDR Forum is addressing the real needs of SDR development as it looks towards implementation and application of SDRs in a variety of marketplaces.

• The SRD Forum is on track with an active technical specification and standards development program.

• The SDR Forum continues an active program to promote public policy decisions to facilitate SDR adoption and deployment.

• The SDR Forum is actively cultivating liaisons and interfaces with relevant external organizations.