do now appoint: to assign a job or role to someone commission papers: an order to authorize...
DESCRIPTION
A.Jefferson (Republican) defeats Adams (Federalist) in the Election of 1800TRANSCRIPT
Do NowAppoint: to assign a job or role to someone
Commission papers: an order to authorize something
Writ of mandamus: an order from a court that some action be performed
Marbury v. Madison
Marbury v. MadisonA. Jefferson (Republican) defeats
Adams (Federalist) in the Election of 1800
Marbury v. Madison1. On his last day, Adams fills courts
with as many Federalist judges as possible
They were called “midnight judges” - Adams waited until 9 o’clock on his last night as
President to appoint them.
Marbury v. Madison2. Jefferson becomes President the
next day but some of Adams’ judges have not yet received their official forms
a. Jefferson says they cannot be judges
Marbury v. Madisonb. Jefferson orders James
Madison (Secretary of State) not to give out the papers to the judges
Marbury v. Madison3. William Marbury is one of the
judges affected by Jefferson’sdecision
Marbury v. Madisona. Marbury demands that the
Supreme Court examine the case and force the executive
branch to hand out papers
Marbury v. MadisonMarbury says Judiciary Act of 1789 gives the Supreme Court the right to do this
What was Judiciary Act of 1789?Created federal court system with 3 levels and outlined the powers of each – district, court of appeals, Supreme Court
4. John Marshall, the chief justice and a Federalist, listens to Marbury’s case
Marbury v. Madison
How do you think Jefferson reacted?How do you think Marshall reacted?
Marbury v. Madisona. Marshall agrees that
Marbury had been treated unfairly
AND…..
Marbury v. Madisonb. Judiciary Act would allow SC
to force Madison into making
Marbury a judge
BUT….
Marbury v. Madisonc. Marshall has to decide is this
constitutional or unconstitutional?
Marbury v. Madison- Marshall decides that forcing the
government to make Marbury judge would be unconstitutional
Marbury v. Madison5. Marshall’s ruling establishes
Judicial Review - Supreme Court can declare act of Congress unconstitutional
Marbury v. Madison• Judicial review has increased the Supreme Court’s legal authority… making it a much stronger branch
Marbury v. Madison1. Why is the Marbury case so important in the history of the Supreme Court?
Marbury v. MadisonThe Marbury v. Madison established
the right of the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of laws. This is called judicial review.
Marbury v. Madison2. In what way did the Marbury decision enhance the system of checks and balances provided for in the Constitution?
Marbury v. MadisonIt provided a way to check the powers
of Congress and the president, and thus more effectively balanced the powers of all three branches of the federal government.
Marbury v. Madison3. Constitutional scholars have pointed out there is an inconsistency in Justice Marshall’s opinion with respect to what the Constitution specifically provides. What is that inconsistency?
Marbury v. MadisonOn one hand, Marshall declared the
Judiciary Act unconstitutional because the power for Congress to pass such an act was not mentioned in the Constitution. Yet at the same time he believed the Supreme Court had the power to declare a law unconstitutional, even though this power was not specifically mentioned in the constitution.
Marbury v. Madison4. The United States is one of the few countries in which the highest court of the land has the power to declare a law unconstitutional. Do you believe that such a power is of benefit to a country? Explain your answer.
Marbury v. Madison5. Justice John Marshall was a Federalist who believed in a strong national government and certainly moved in this direction with his Marbury ruling. Do you think it is proper for a Supreme Court Justice to allow his or her personal political opinions to influence the rulings of the Court? Explain.