do neuroscientific explanations of religious experiences lead to naturalism? by assoc. prof. dr....
TRANSCRIPT
Do Neuroscientific Explanations of Religious Experiences lead to
Naturalism?
By
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Theol. Anne L.C. Runehov
Lay-out• Introduction• Michael Persinger
– Epelipsy and Religious Experiences– Philosophical problems
• Andrew Newberg and Eugene d’Aquili– Absolute Unitary Being (AUB)– Philosophical problems
• Conclusion
Introduction
• Living in the Age of Neuroscience– Clinical neuroscience, Experimental
neuroscience, Cognitive neuroscience, Affective neuroscience, behavioural neuroscience (the Social neurosciences)
– Increasing interest in mental phenomena (the riddle of consciousness)
– Increasing interest in religious phenomena (the effects of meditation)
• Comprehensive ontological naturalistic version based on ontological reductive methods.
• Minimalist ontological naturalism version based on methodological reductive methods
What is Neuroscience?
• First known brain surgery
Neuroscience: roots in early Greek medicine
Nerve energy electircal not spiritual (19th century)
Neuron: basic component similar for all creatures (19th century)
100 billions neurons (today)
• ‘[I]t has been calculated that the number of possible permutations and combinations of brain activity, in other words the numbers of brain states, exceeds the number of elementary particles in the known universe’ (Ramachandran 2003, 4).
>
Dark energy and matter: 95% of the universe Dark brain energy: DMN
‘[O]ur conscious interactions with the world are just a small part of the brain’s activity. What goes on below the level of awareness–the brain’s dark energy, for one–is critical in providing the context for what we experience in the small window of conscious awareness’ (Raichle 2010, 33).
Michael Persinger
There does not exist any God – religious experiences have nothing to do with any God or Ultimate Reality – it is all about brain activity and nothing else (Persinger).
The Helmet
Newberg & d’Aquili
The fact that one can observe specific brain activity that correlates with
specific religious experiences and that this brain activity is equal for
Everybody who has such an experience indicates that God has to be
real. (Newberg and d’Aquili)
Amygdale: The Watchdog
Hippocampus: the diplomat
During an epileptic seizure, the the watchdog takes the diplomat by surprize
Hypothalamus
• Epilepsia (Greek): to lay hold of, seize, attack
• Hippocrates: On the Sacred Disease
• Latin: Morbus Sacer
Only God can throw a person on the ground
like this and bring him or her to life again.
The PPI
• Have you ever experienced a sensed presence despite nobody beside you being in the room?
• Have you ever experienced hearing a voice which was not your own when nobody was talking to you?
• Are you religious? Do you meditate?
Cognitive Kindling• Epileptic seizures can be evoked by
stimulating specific parts of the brain, for example the right temporal lobe. Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE)
Persinger’s Original HelmetMagnetic Stimulation TMS
• Questions1. Vibration, out-of body experiences, spinning
around: RE?2. Double blind study? Implications of
experimenter-interaction?3. Increased RTL activity: TLE, Schizophrenia
and RE but• Decreased FL activity: TLE, Schizophernia• Increased FL activity: RE (Scott Atran)
Different neuroanatomies
4. RE: communication with some Ultimate Reality
TLE and the Saints
• St. Paul, Joan of Arc, St Teresa of Avila, St Birgitta of Sweden, Swedenborg, ...
Vadstena nunnery
Reliquary, shrine
1303-1373
Did St. Birgitta have Epilespy?
For Against
Tunor: Hyperostosis frontalis interna
Variation of experiences/ already as young
Frontal-lobe epilespsy not TLE
High amount information
Glowing globe Complex writings
Dostoevsjij (But TLE) No record of St.Birgitta having seizures
Newberg and d’Qquili
• God or Ultimate Reality is REAL
Tibetan Buddhists at meditation
Franciscan Nuns at Prayer
Neural correlations
• Amygdale-Hippocampus-Hypothalamus complex
• Posterior Parietal Lobes (PSPL).
• PSPL: – 3D pictures of the body in space– Self-other and self-world distinction
• AUB: – Feeling completely united with God or UR – No experience of self– No experience of self in space– No experience of self in time
• Cross religions – meditation or prayer techniques
• Neurologically: Total deafferentation of the right and left PSPL
1. If AUB ↔ total deafferentation of the L and R PSPL.
2. 2 different total deafferentations of the PSPLs are not possible
3. All who meditate, regardless of the meditation technique used, will sooner or later experience AUB
4. Those who experienced AUB belonged to different religions
Conclusion
• There cannot be two different AUB regardless of religion.
• Hence: Experiencing AUB has to be equal for all experiencers.
• Consequently, God or Ultimate Reality is real and AUB becomes the invariant element in all religions.
Philosophical problems
Not enough attention to
Cultural-religious-personal aspects
Plasticity of the Brain: Brain are like faced
Total deafferentation: clinical condition
Multiple Realization Principle
Study on Glossolalia
• Individuals speak in an incomprehensive language that has no linguistic structure
• Individuals lack control over vocalization
Decrease in left frontal activity – decrease in thalamic activity
Indicates: expressive language parts are not directly affected: the individual does not speak voluntary!
• Individuals do have complete control over what happens
• Meaning providing experience
Increase in PSPL (contrary meditation and prayer
Indicates: no loss of self or space or time
Increase in limbic area
Indicates: The altered emotional state
• Newberg and d’Aquili: helpful because
(1)Valid Research
(2)Show important and different (!) neural correlations for different RE
(3)However at times speculative