diversity update 2020€¦ · diversity update 2020 october 2020...

Diversity Update 2020

October 2020

apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum

https://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/

From 2011 to 2020 § 4.9 percentage

point increase in Minority Enrollment

§ 2.0 percentage point increase in Targeted Minority Enrollment

Percent Enrollment of Minority Students

Targeted Minorities include Black/African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority/minority calculations.

http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20

Minority Students as a Percentage of All Students (All Levels)

Collection of Southeast Asian status begins

Minority Students, 18.8%

Targeted Minority Students, 10.4%

Demographic Variables for Analysis

This presentation includes variables for which we have available from student data, including:§ Race/ethnicity§ Income level§ First-generation in college§ Gender§ Geographic location dataInformation is not systematically available for all groupsthat are important to inclusive excellence at UW-Madison.It’s also important to note that data presented should not imply acausal relationship between the demographic variable and the outcome presented.


Race/Ethnic Categories: Students

Ø Continued terminology from Plan 2008/Lawton Grants

Ø Includes all Asians, useful for national peer comparisons.

• Targeted Minorities include:» Black/African American» Native American» Hispanic/Latino/a» Southeast Asian

(Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong)

• Minorities include:» Targeted Minority

categories» Other Asians» Native Hawaiians

Students self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of application. This information is then aggregated for reporting and analysis

International students are not counted in any of these collections, in keeping with state/federal guidelines.


Race/Ethnicity ReportingReporting Methodologies for Race/Ethnicity InformationIn 2010, the federal government (through the Department of Education) implemented national standards for the collection and reporting of race/ethnicity data for university students and staff. This collection allows for the reporting of multiple race/ethnic identities in a way that was not possible prior to 2010. The major differences between main data reporting options are explained below.Subsequent slides in this presentation use the Federal reporting methodology.

Reporting Feature Federal Count All

Results in single count of students P

Prioritizes Hispanic/Latino(a) over all other values P

Reports categories that are not reported by students themselves P

Reports race/ethnic values only for domestic (non international) students P P

Reports ALL students who indicate a particularrace/ethnicity P

Used in data reporting and peer comparisons P


Counting Students by Race/Ethnicity:National Standard vs. Duplicated Counts

The Federal method of reporting race/ethnicity impacts enrollment counts:

• All students reporting Hispanic/Latino(a) are categorized as such, even if they also belong to additional racial groups

• Non-Hispanic students reporting more than one race are reported as “two or more races”.

• This lowers the number of students reported in the singular race categories when counting via the Federal method.

• To count all students who identify with any single racial/ethnic group the “count all” method should be used.


Federal, 1,000

Count All, 1,569

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Black/African American Students

Count All, 2,736

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Hispanic/Latino(a) StudentsFederal,

2,736

Federal, 105

Count All, 511

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Native American Students

This section includes information on:• Enrollment– Undergraduate– Graduate/Post-Bachelor’s– School/College– Peer comparisons

Includes breakouts by race/ethnicity, gender, geography

Enrollment

Equity in Educational Outcomes


Percent Enrollment of Minority Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity

Targeted Minorities include Black/African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority or minority categories.

From 2011 to 2020: § 1.9 percentage point increase in

undergraduate targeted minority

enrollment§ International

Students: 9.4% of undergraduate

enrollment


Targeted Minority

Students, 11.7%


International Students, 9.4%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Undergraduates

• 11.7% of all undergraduates are targeted minorities.

• 13.1% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are targeted minorities.


9.9% 9.9% 10.1% 10.3% 10.2% 10.5% 10.6% 10.6% 10.8%11.7%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

All Undergraduates

10.7%

8.8%10.4% 10.3% 9.8%

10.9% 10.5% 10.6% 10.8%

13.1%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

New Undergraduates

12% 11%10%

15%

8%

15%

12%

20%

9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Total CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing Pharmacy

N=324

N=229

N=358

N=2,065

N=181

N=<5

• In 2020, the College of Letters and Science has the largest number of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled.

• The School of Nursing has the largest percentage of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled, with 20 percent of Nursing students identifying as targeted minorities.

Targeted Minorities include Black/African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.

Percent Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College: Undergraduates


N=3,714

N=331

N=222

Percent of Undergraduates who are Minorities at Major Public Research Institutions, Fall 2018

Average Percent Minority for Major Public Research Institutions: 37%

1 Major Public Research Institution has a lower percent of minority students than UW-Madison.

5 Major Public Research Institutions have a smaller number of minority students than UW-Madison.

Peer Enrollments by Minority Status

Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2018

80%


N= 4,304 N= 5,276 N= 4,311 N= 4,059

N= 6,775 N= 8,266 N= 8,401 N= 9,809 N= 7,073

N= 4,420 N= 7,474 N= 4,619 N= 7,584 N= 6,216

N= 8,985 N= 5,737

N= 6,127 N= 5,359 N= 7,064

N= 20,261 N= 6,030 N= 13,349 N= 14,321 N= 14,149 N= 13,073

N= 13,913 N= 8,363

N= 18,402 N= 21,696 N= 12,575

N= 17,731 N= 17,940 N= 18,781 N= 10,690 N= 18,347

N= 20,345

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Iowa StateWisconsin

IowaMissouri

PurduePenn State

Michigan StateOhio State

IndianaKansas

MinnesotaPittsburgh

ColoradoUtah

MichiganOregon

North CarolinaVirginia

SUNY-BuffaloTexas A&M

Georgia TechIllinoisFlorida

ArizonaMaryland

WashingtonSUNY-Stony Brook

RutgersUT-Austin

UC-Santa BarbaraUC-Davis

UC-BerkeleyUCLA

UC-Santa CruzUC-San Diego

UC-Irvine

Percent Enrollment of Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity


From 2011 to 2020: § 2.2 percentage

point increase in graduate targeted minority enrollment

§ International students make up 29.6% of graduate enrollment

http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

Targeted Minority Students, 10.5%



0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

From 2011 to 2020: § Enrollments of

targeted minority students ranged from a low of 7.8% (2013) and a high of 13.5% (2020)

§ International students make up 2.0% of clinical doctoral student enrollment

Percent Enrollment of Minority Clinical Doctorate Students, by Race/Ethnicity



Targeted Minority

Students, 13.5%



0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant Recipients (Undergraduates)


• 14.4% of all undergraduates are Pell Grant recipients.

• 17.2% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are Pell Grant recipients.

All Undergraduates

New Undergraduates

16.0 15.8 14.6 14.513.2 12.3

14.4 14.0 13.9 14.4

0

5

10

15

20

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

16.514.8 14.8

13.5 12.9 12.0

15.2 14.3 15.017.2

0

5

10

15

20

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Percent of Undergraduates who were Pell Recipients at AAU Public Institutions, 2018-19

Average percent Pell recipients for AAU public institutions: 24%

2 Major Public Research Institutions have a lower percent of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.

5 Major Public Research Institutions have a lower number of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.

Peer Enrollments of Pell Grant Recipients

Source: IPEDS Student Financial Aid Data, 2018-19http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

50%

Pell Grants are federally funded grants for students with high financial need. This indicator is a proxy for low income student enrollments.

N= 2,248 N= 2,242 N= 4,584 N= 2,968 N= 5,085 N= 4,828 N= 5,200 N= 5,626 N= 6,360 N= 6,261 N= 4,871 N= 6,212 N= 9,608 N= 4,170 N= 4,650 N= 6,647 N= 8,747 N= 11,572 N= 17,772 N= 9,212 N= 7,884 N= 4,434

N= 9,175 N= 4,890 N= 6,360 N= 8,231

N= 10,488 N= 9,863

N= 10,067 N= 7,177

N= 6,212 6,205 N= 8,242 N= 11,262 N= 11,061

N= 11,890

0 10 20 30 40 50

VirginiaGeorgia Tech

WisconsinPittsburgh

PurdueColoradoMichiganMaryland

MinnesotaIndiana

IowaIowa StateOhio State

KansasMissouri

WashingtonMichigan State

Texas A&MPenn StateUT-Austin

IllinoisNorth Carolina

FloridaOregon

UtahUC-Berkeley

RutgersArizona

UCLASUNY-Buffalo

SUNY-Stony BrookUC-Santa Cruz

UC-Santa BarbaraUC-Davis

UC-San DiegoUC-Irvine

• Data on first-generation status is collected at the time of application.

• Question first asked in 2005, in 2016 international students first asked.

• 18.0% of New Students (New Freshmen + New Transfers) are first-generation students.

Percent Enrollment of First-Generation Students (Undergraduates)

http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htmAll Undergraduates

New Undergraduates

In 2018 there is an unexplained sharp increase in the number and percentage of applicants reporting that neither of their parents has a four-year college degree. It is not clear how much of the increase is due to a real change in the demographic profile of applicants and how much is due to other factors which may have contributed to a different interpretation of the question on the application for admission.

21.8 20.8 20.2 19.4 18.4 18.4 18.0 19.4 19.4 19.4

0

5

10

15

20

25

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

21.918.9 20.1 18.5 17.4 18.1 18.7

24.1

18.2 18.0

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Women as a Percentage of Total Enrollment,by School/College


Fall 2020• Nursing has the highest percent of women enrolled (86%) and Engineering has the

lowest percent (26%)

52%

62%

41%

53%

75%

26%

74%

65%

52% 50%57%

86%

62%

78%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Total CALS Business DCS Education Engineering SoHE Nelson Inst. L&S Law SMPH Nursing Pharmac VetMed

K-12 Enrollment Projections

Wisconsin’s public school enrollments can impact the pipeline to enrollment at UW-Madison and our ability to enroll a diverse group of Wisconsin resident students. High School enrollment is projected to increase and then decline.Projections by race/ethnicity show that:

– Increases in Latino/a and Asian students.– Some declining enrollment of African American and

Native American students.– Decreases in non-Hispanic White students.

Enrollment projections by geographic locale:– Suburban public school district enrollment will be

stable– Urban, Rural, and Town district enrollment will

decline.

Source: “Projecting Public School Enrollment in Wisconsin, 2019”, Applied Population Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison http://apl.wisc.edu


In-State Pipeline: Minority

•26% of Wisconsin High School graduates who took the ACT are minority students(2017-18)

•16% of UW-Madison in-state applicants are minority students (2018)

•17% of in-state New Freshmen are minority students (2018)


Non-Minority,

74%

Non-Minority,

84%

Non-Minority,

84%

Non-Minority,

83%

Minority, 26%

Minority, 16%

Minority, 16%

Minority, 17%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

High SchoolGraduates whoTook the ACT

Applicants Admitted Enrolled

Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,New Freshmen, Fall 2020

•Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.


Total Applicants

% Admitted

% Enrolled/ Yield Rate

Overall 45,941 57.2 27.8

Male 23,046 54.7 27.5Female 22,895 59.8 28.0

Resident 8,156 73.1 63.8Domestic Non-Res. 25,085 58.0 15.5

International 9,023 43.3 13.9

Targeted Minorities 5,948 60.0 27.7Total Minority 11,366 62.3 23.9

First Generation 7,927 49.0 31.4

Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,Transfer Students, Fall 2020

•Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.


Total Applicants

% Admitted

% Enrolled/ Yield Rate

Overall 3,525 51.9 55.2

Male 1,927 50.0 55.5Female 1,598 54.3 54.9

Resident 1,379 61.2 80.0Domestic Non-Res. 938 39.4 28.8

International 1,071 51.6 34.4

Targeted Minorities 433 40.4 60.0Total Minority 642 43.0 59.4

First Generation 980 47.2 59.8

Diversity Programs

Programs that increase access and success for underrepresented populations on campus and are centrally coordinated.• Programs with a Pre-College Component

– PEOPLE– POSSE

• Student Support Programs– Center for Educational Opportunity (CEO, formerly TRIO)– Academic Advancement Program– CAE (Center for Academic Excellence)

• Scholarship Programs– Chancellor’s Scholars– Powers/Knapp– First Wave

Academic Support Communitieshttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

Fall 2020 Undergraduate Participation in Academic Support Communities

*Targeted Minorities include Black/African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.

Academic Support Community

Total Participants

Targeted Minority* Male Wisconsin

ResidentFirst

GenerationPell Grant

Eligible

Center for EducationalOpportunity (CEO) 509 61% 29% 76% 89% 72%

PEOPLE 411 84% 36% 99% 71% 64%

Posse 179 87% 45% 0% 54% 47%

First Wave 35 80% 34% 17% 26% 54%

Chancellor’s Scholar Program 301 90% 40% 55% 30% 25%

Powers/KnappProgram 241 91% 39% 58% 40% 29%

Center for AcademicExcellence (CAE) 276 83% 28% 75% 80% 76%

All Undergraduates 31,651 12% 48% 56% 19% 14%


Retention and Graduation


7 percentage pointGraduation Rate gap

No First-Year Retention Rate gap

All Students: 95.2%

All Students: 88.5%

Targeted Minority Students: 81.5%

Targeted Minority Students: 95.9%

Closing the Achievement Gap in Graduation Rates at UW-Madison(percent graduated within 6 years)

Closing the Achievement Gap in Retention Rates at UW-Madison(percent retained to the second year)

See https://apir.wisc.edu/students/retention-graduation/ for detailed comparisons.

70

80

90

10020

00

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Perc

ent R

etai

ned

Year of Cohort Entrance

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Perc

ent G

radu

ated

Year of Cohort Entrance

https://apir.wisc.edu/students/retention-graduation/

Graduation Rate Difference, UW-Madison Compared to Other Major Public Research Universities

Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall graduation rates. This represents the newest peer data available.

• Underrepresented minority students at major research universities graduated on average at rates 9 percentage points lower than all students at major research universities (based on data for 2012 entrance cohorts, measured in Fall 2018).

• In the same year, UW-Madison underrepresented minority students graduated at rates 4.3 points lower than all students.

•For the most recent year (measured in Fall 2020), UW-Madison’s gap is 7 percentage points for targeted minority students (81.6% graduation rate)


19.4%15.6%

14.9%12.2%

11.2%10.7%10.7%10.6%10.9%

10.4%10.0%

9.7%9.6%9.6%

9.3%9.0%8.9%

8.4%8.4%

7.5%6.9%

6.3%5.7%

4.7%4.3%4.2%

3.8%3.7%

3.0%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%

Fall 2012 Gaps in 6-Year Graduation Rates

• “Wisconsin Experience” captures four inquiry-based high-impact practices and includes:– Substantial research experiences that

generate knowledge and analytical skills

– Global and cultural competencies and engagement

– Leadership and activism opportunities– Application of knowledge in the “real

world”

• In 2017-18, 91% of bachelor’s degree recipients participated in at least one Wisconsin Experience Program

• Targeted minority graduates were slightly more likely to have completed at least one Wisconsin Experience activity.

Wisconsin Experience

Equity in Educational Outcomes


91%95%

0102030405060708090

100

Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin

Experience ActivityAll Targeted Minority

Graduates

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2020: Selected Results

Percent of students who often or very often had discussions with people :http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students/nsse/ for more information

58

70

73

68

63

75

77

71

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

… with political views other than their own

… with religious beliefs diferent than their own

… from an economic background other than their own

… of a race or ethnicity other than their own

First-Year Students Seniors

http://apir.wisc.edu/students/nsse/

NSSE 2020: Selected results

Percent of students who often or very often have:http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm


73

55

73

57

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Tried to better understand someone else'sviews by imagining how an issue looks from

his or her perspective

Included diverse perspectives (political,religious, racial/ethnic, gender, etc.) in

course discussions or assignments



NSSE 2020: Selected results

Percent of Seniors who felt quite a bit or very much:http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm


62

46

60

58

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

… that their experience at this institution contributed to their knowledge, skills, and personal

development in understanding people of other backgrounds (economic, racial/ethnic, political,

religious, nationality, etc.)

… that their institution emphasizes encouraging contact among students from different

backgrounds (social, racial/ethnic, religious, etc.)



2020 data available in December 2020

Women as a Percentage of all Facultyhttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

• In Fall 2019 37.4% of Faculty were women.

•30.7% of Full Professors, 45.5% of Associate Professors, and 46.7% of Assistant Professors were women.

30% 30% 31% 31% 32% 33% 36%35%34%34%33%

31% 31% 32% 33% 33% 34%34% 35% 36%

37%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Num

ber o

f Fac

ulty

Men Women

37%

53%49%

60%

50%53%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Faculty LimitedAppointments

Instructional Staff Academic Staff University Staff Overall

Perc

enta

ge o

f Wom

en F

acul

ty

2009 2014 2019

Women as a Percentage of Faculty and Staff in Last 10 Years

2020 data available in December 2020


•Women make up just over 51% of all employees at UW-Madison.•A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (37%)

Peer Comparisons

for Faculty Diversity

Women Full-Time Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty as a Percent of Total Full-Time Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2018

Source: IPEDS Fall HR 2018


Average percent women faculty for AAU public institutions: 34.1%

UW-Madison: 37.4%

29 AAU public institutions have a lower number of women tenure/tenure track faculty.

50%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

Georgia Tech (196)UC-San Diego (396)

Texas A&M (604)Purdue (510)Virginia (442)

Stony Brook (306)Florida (641)

Iowa State (404)Buffalo (352)

UC-Berkeley (445)Pittsburgh (529)

Iowa (444)Maryland (462)

UCLA (580)Texas (647)

Illinois (608)Indiana (472)Kansas (419)

Missouri (336)Michigan (974)

Penn State (641)Colorado (422)

Arizona (548)Minnesota (776)Wisconsin (693)

Michigan State (683)Rutgers (619)

UC-Davis (596)UC-Santa Barbara (322)

Ohio State (929)UC-Irvine (487)

North Carol ina (511)Oregon (313)

Washington (1151)Institution (Number of Women faculty)

Employee Race/Ethnicity Data

Employees self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of hire.

Employees may choose any of the following designations, and may select two or more races beginning in 2010:

• White• Black or African American• Asian or Asian American• American Indian or Alaska Native• Hispanic/ Latino/a• Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

Individuals with a temporary visa status are included in the racial/ethnic category counts


Minority Faculty Recruitment

22.1% of all faculty identify in minority groups 8.1% of faculty identify as non-AsianIn 2019 over 40% of new hires were minority faculty members


22%

8%

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Total Minority Faculty and New Hire by Year

Asian

More then oneraceNative Hawaiian /Pacific IslanderAmerican Indian

Black / AfricanAmericanHispanic (allraces)

18% 18% 18% 19% 19% 20% 21% 21% 22%23%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Num

ber o

f U

nder

repr

esen

ted

Facu

ltyMinority Faculty Representation

23% of Faculty are racial/ethnic minorities4.2 percentage point increase in minority faculty since 2010

Fall 2020 data available in December 2020, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010


Asian, 14.3%

Two or more races, 1.3%

Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander, 0.1%

Native American, 0.4%

Black/ African American, 2.8%

Hispanic, 4.2%

White, 77.0%

Minorities as a Percentage of Faculty and Staff in Last 10 Years


• The percentage of minorities has increased in all job categoriesFall 2020 data available in December 2020, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010

23%

15%

14%

15%

19%

17%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Faculty LimitedAppointments

Instructional Staff Academic Staff University Staff Overall

Perc

enta

ge o

f Min

ority

Fac

ulty

2009 2014 2019

Peer Comparisons

for Faculty Diversity

Minority Full-Time Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty as a Percent of Total Full-Time Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2018

Source: IPEDS Fall HR 2018


Average percent minority faculty for AAU public institutions: 23.7%

UW-Madison: 20%

20 AAU public institutions have a lower number of minority tenure/tenure track faculty.

40%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

Georgia Tech (143)Oregon (148)Virginia (273)Rutgers (324)

Colorado (234)Wisconsin (389)

UC-Santa Barbara (176)Minnesota (454)

Iowa (279)Penn State (387)

North Carol ina (284)Arizona (343)

Stony Brook (220)Washington (671)

Texas (442)Indiana (325)Kansas (289)

UC-Berkeley (326)Ohio State (591)

Buffalo (264)UC-Davis (397)

Florida (510)Michigan State (469)

Iowa State (316)Pittsburgh (404)

Missouri (245)Michigan (722)

UC-San Diego (374)Maryland (379)

Purdue (474)UC-Irvine (369)

Texas A&M (596)Illinois (529)UCLA (535)

Percent Non-Asian Minority Percent All Minority

Institution (Number of Minority faculty)

Faculty Tenure Data

• Faculty who did not receive tenure include:– Those who were denied

tenure– Those who left the

university for another position elsewhere

– A few faculty members still hold probationary appointments after 9 years.

• Tenure and promotion rates are calculated at 7 and 9 years after hire, to account for those who have extensions on the tenure clock.

• Data combine hires from 2003-04 to 2012-13. This is necessary to account for small numbers of hires.

• Small Ns make tenure rates subject to large variation.


Notes about faculty tenure data:

Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Gender and Race / Ethnicity


Average percent tenured based on data for hires from 2003-04 to 2012-13

53%

42%

76%72%

0

20

40

60

80

100

03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13

Minority Non-Minority

0

20

40

60

80

100

03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13

Women Men

Perc

ent P

rom

oted

to Te

nure

10-year average rates

Women: 70.3%

Men: 73.2%

Underrepresentedrace/ethnicity: 65.9%

White/Unknown: 74%

Promotion to Tenure

• A lower percentage of women and men are promoted to tenure within the Social Sciences division.

• The largest gap in tenure rates by gender is in the Arts and Humanities division.


81%N=12577%

N=6876%

N=133

78%N=34

79%N=57

80%N=69

63%N=90 56%

N=78

Data on faculty hires from 2003-04 to 2012-2013

79% 79%

71%

63%69%

78% 79%

64%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Biological Sciences Physical Sciences Arts & Humanities Social Sciences

Percent Promoted to Tenure Within 7 Years

Women Men

Promotion to Tenure

• A lower percentage of faculty members are promoted to tenure within the Social Sciences division.

• The largest gaps in tenure rates by minority status are within the Social Sciences division

Data on faculty hires from 2003-04 to 2012-13


78%N=116

77%N=56

78%N=144

82%N=42

83%N=91

68%N=34 64%

N=128 58%N=38

70%77% 75%

53%

76%81%

75%

68%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Biological Sciences Physical Sciences Arts & Humanities Social Sciences

Percent Promoted to Tenure within 7 YearsMinority Non-Minority

Diversity Update 2020

• Slideshow available at http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/

• Questions about these slides:– Sara Lazenby ([email protected])– Jocelyn Milner ([email protected])


mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

diversity update 2020€¦ · diversity update 2020 october 2020...

Documents