district pdf reportirn: 049882 printed on august 21, 2016 page 4 of 30 2014 - 2015 report card for...

IRN: 049882 of 30Printed on August 21, 2016

Marlington Local School District2014 - 2015 Report Card for

Coming in

2018

DISTRICT GRADE

Achievement

Performance Index

Indicators MetA

Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADE Progress

Value-Added

Students with Disabilities.....................................................................................

Lowest 20% in Achievement..............................................................................

Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADEThis grade combines two results for students whotook the state tests. The first result answers thequestion – How many students passed the state test?The second result answers the question – How welldid students do on the state test?

This is your district’s average progress for itsstudents in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looksat how much each student learns in a year. Didthe students get a year’s worth of growth? Didthey get more? Did they get less?

B

93.9%............................................................................................................................................

80.3%..........................................................................................................................

Overall...................................................................................................................

Gifted...................................................................................................................

FFDC

2015 Modified Achievement Measure

Gap Closing

Annual Measurable Objectives75.0%............................................................................................................................................

C

Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADE Graduation Rate

Graduation Ratesof students graduated in 4 years...................................................................................92.0%of students graduated in 5 years.................................................................................96.6%

Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADEThis grade shows how well all students are doing inyour district in reading, math, and graduation. Itanswers the question – Is every student succeeding,regardless of income, race, ethnicity, or disability?

This grade answers the question – How manyninth graders graduate in four years or five years?

AB

2015 AMO Download File

K-3 Literacy

Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADE Prepared for Success

Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADEThis grade answers the question – Are more studentslearning to read in kindergarten through third grade?

This grade answers the question – Are studentswho graduate from your district ready for collegeor a career? There are many ways to show thatgraduates are prepared.

26.7%....................................................................................................................................................................

FK-3 Literacy Improvement

http://reportcard.education.ohio.gov/Download Data/2014-2015/District Data/Modified Achievement.xls

http://reportcard.education.ohio.gov/Download Data/2014-2015/District Data/1415_AMO_DISTRICT.xls


2014 - 2015 Report Card for Marlington Local School District

AchievementThis grade combines two results for students who took the state tests.The first result answers the question – How many students passed thestate test? The second result answers the question – How well didstudents do on the state test? Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADE

0.0 ===

0.01.3xxx

Advanced PlusAdvanced

AcceleratedProficient

BasicLimited

Untested

1.21.11.00.60.30.0

13.139.127.613.56.60.1

15.743.127.68.12.00.0

96.4xxxx

====

0

20

40 60

80

100

BGRADE Performance Index

The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those whoscore proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive pointsfor every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the morethe points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts forimproving the performance of all students, regardless of achievement level.

80.3%

Performance Index

96.4 of a possible 120.0

A = 90.0 - 100.0%B = 80.0 - 89.9%C = 70.0 - 79.9%D = 50.0 - 69.9%F = 0.0 - 49.9%

13.1

39.1

27.6

6.6

13.50.1

Advanced PlusAdvancedAcceleratedProficientLimitedBasicUntested

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

101.4 101.2 102.2 101.696.4

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Untested Limited Basic Proficient Accelerated Advanced

Advanced Plus

AchievementLevel

Pct ofStudents

Points forthis Level

PointsReceived

Performance Index Trend



AGRADE Indicators Met

Indicators Met measures the percent of students who have passed state tests. It alsoincludes the gifted indicator. Test results are reported for each student in a grade andsubject.

Indicators Met %

0

20

40 60

80

100

93.9%31 out of 33

A =B =C =D =F =

90.0 - 100.0%80.0 - 89.9%70.0 - 79.9%50.0 - 69.9%0.0 - 49.9%

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade

Mathematics

Reading

Mathematics

Reading

Social Studies

Mathematics

Reading

Science

76.2%

86.1%

71.2%

83.7%

89.5%

80.8%

78.8%

81.2%

6th Grade

7th Grade

8th Grade

Mathematics

Reading

Social Studies

Mathematics

Reading

Mathematics

Reading

Science

67.7%

78.9%

66.3%

76.5%

82.9%

71.4%

81.0%

79.3%

Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8

OGT, 10th Graders

OGT, 11th Graders

HS

Mathematics

Reading

Science

Social Studies

Writing

Mathematics

Reading

Science

Social Studies

Writing

Algebra I

English I

Geometry

Government

History

Physical Science

88.6%

89.1%

82.8%

86.8%

89.5%

91.1%

93.9%

89.4%

92.7%

92.7%

75.3%

84.8%

100.0%

60.0%

73.6%

75.0%

Ohio Graduation Test

GIFTED INDICATOR



Achievement Levels by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade

3rd Grade

62%64%66%68%70%72%74%76%78%80%

72.0%

76.9%

63.0%

73.6%

78.5%

66.3%

Reading Mathematics

District Similar Districts State Average

76%

80%

84%

88%

92%

96%

100%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Reading Mathematics

3rd Grade

4th Grade

64%68%72%

76%80%84%88%92%

77.1%80.6%

90.6%

65.4%

80.1%

86.2%

71.9%

65.1%

72.0%

Reading Mathematics Social Studies


68%72%76%80%84%88%92%96%

100%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


4th Grade

5th Grade

60%64%68%

72%76%80%84%88%

74.2%70.3%

84.5%

66.9%

71.3%

78.5%

69.5%65.7%

60.3%

Reading Mathematics Science


65%70%75%

80%85%90%95%

100%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


5th Grade



6th Grade

56%60%64%

68%72%76%80%84%

64.8%68.2%

79.4%

58.9%61.0%

68.5%70.3%

65.4%

57.5%



65%70%75%

80%85%90%95%

100%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


6th Grade

7th Grade

54%56%58%60%62%64%66%68%70%

64.2%

55.9%

58.3%

61.0%

68.6%

65.3%

Reading Mathematics


68%72%76%80%84%88%92%96%

100%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Reading Mathematics

7th Grade

8th Grade

50%55%60%

65%70%75%80%85%

66.8%70.0%

83.2%

51.2%

65.8%

76.3%

68.3%

53.7%

62.3%



68%72%76%80%84%88%92%96%

100%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


8th Grade



10th Grade OGT

No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filterexcludes all data.

82%84%86%88%90%92%94%96%98%

100%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Reading Writing Mathematics Social StudiesScience

10th Grade OGT

11th Grade Cumulative OGT

84%

86%

88%

90%

92%

94%

96%

93.6% 92.9%91.2% 91.8%

90.1%

94.8% 92.7%92.8% 92.2%

89.8%92.2% 91.7%

88.7% 88.4%

84.7%

Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science


88%

90%

92%94%

96%

98%

100%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Reading Writing Mathematics Social StudiesScience

11th Grade Cumulative OGT



Gifted StudentsThe Gifted Students data and Indicator highlight the opportunities forand performance of gifted students. The dashboard answers severalquestions: How many students are identified as gifted and in what

categories? How many of those students are receiving gifted services?How well are those gifted students performing? The Gifted Indicator

measures whether opportunity and performance expectations are beingmet for gifted students.

INDICATOR

Not Met

The Gifted Indicator is derived from three components: Gifted Value Added grade, thePerformance Index for gifted students, and a Gifted Inputs score.

Gifted Value Added

Districts must earn a Gifted Value Added grade of Cor better to meet the Gifted Value Added

component. A grade of "NR" results in Not Met ifthe district has an ADM of 600 or more.

Gifted Performance Index

Districts with at least 10 unique students in theGifted Performance Index calculation must score115.0 or better to meet the Gifted Performance

Index component.

Gifted Inputs

Points are earned based on identification andservices provided to gifted students. Districts mustearn at least 40 points out of a possible 100 to meet

the Gifted Inputs component.

Gifted Indicator Final Result

The Gifted Indicator is Met if none of the threecomponents are Not Met. Gifted Inputs alone

cannot determine the Gifted Indicator, however; ifboth the Value Added and Performance Index

components are NC, then the Gifted Indicator is alsoNC.

INDICATOR

Not Met

Total Points:Gifted Inputs Met?: Met

40.0

Performance Index:Performance Index Met?:

113.586

Not Met

Value Added Grade:Enrollment:

Value Added Met?

D2,284

Not Met

Overview Performance Index

0

20

40 60

80

100

94.7%113.586 of a possible 120.0

A = 90.0 - 100.0%B = 80.0 - 89.9%C = 70.0 - 79.9%D =50.0 - 69.9%F = 0.0 - 49.9%

AchievementLevel

Pct ofStudents

Points forthis Level

PointsReceived

Advanced Plus 0.0 x 1.3 = 0.0Advanced 40.5 x 1.2 = 48.6

Accelerated 56.3 x 1.1 = 61.9Proficient 3.0 x 1.0 = 3.0

Basic 0.3 x 0.6 = 0.2Limited 0.0 x 0.3 = 0.0

Untested 0.0 x 0.0 = 0.0113.586

40.5

56.3

3.00.3

Advanced PlusAdvancedAcceleratedProficientLimitedBasicUntested

The Performance Index calculation for gifted students. Only teststaken by students identified as gifted in that subject (e.g. gifted in

Math and taking the Math test), or taken by students identified withSuper Cognitive abilities regardless of test subject are included.



Gifted IndicatorThe Gifted Inputs calculation assigns points based on the percentage of students identified and served in eight categories (factors). The points earned for each category are totaled to determine the final Met/Not Met

determination for the Gifted Input component.

Reading, Math, Science, Social Studies, and Superior Cognitive Abilities

K-3

96.7%0.4%

2.9%

4-8

88.3%

10.0%

1.6%

9-12

85.1%

3.9%

11.0%

Visual/Performing Arts and Creative Thinking

K-3 4-8 9-12

100.0% 0.1%99.9% 1.1%98.9%

Disadvantaged Students

1.5%1.7%96.7%

Minority Students

2.1%0.7%97.2%

Receiving Gifted Services Identified as Gifted, butnot receiving services

Not Identified as Gifted



Identification and Services

Grades K-3

0.0%

0.4%

0.8%

1.2%

1.6%

2.0%

2.4%

2.8%

0.7%

2.6%

1.3%

0.2% 0.1%

Math Reading Superior Cognitive

Identified Receiving Services

Grades 4-8

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

5.9% 6.0%

0.3% 0.4%

5.2%

0.1%

2.9%

4.1%4.7%

MathReading

ScienceSocial Studies

Superior CognitiveVisual and Performing Arts


Grades 9-12

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

0.1%

6.3%

7.8%

4.5%

1.6%

7.9%

1.0%

2.0%1.4%

2.1%1.4%

Creative ThinkingMath

ReadingScience

Social StudiesSuperior Cognitive

Visual and Performing Arts


These charts show the percentage of enrolled students that are identified as gifted and that are receiving gifted services.

All Grades

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

0.0%

4.5%

5.6%

1.5%

0.7%

4.9%

0.3%

1.8%2.1%

0.7%

2.4%

Creative ThinkingMath

ReadingScience

Social StudiesSuperior Cognitive

Visual and Performing Arts




Identified and Receiving Services

Grades K-3

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

0.0%

9.6%

11.1%

Math Reading Superior Cognitive

Grades 4-8

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

48.1%

67.3%

0.0% 0.0%

91.5%

0.0%

Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive

Visual and PerformingArts

Grades 9-12

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

0.0%

31.6%

18.3%

48.1%

0.0%

18.1%

0.0%

Creative Thinking Math Reading Science Social Studies

Superior Cognitive Visual and PerformingArts

These charts show, of the students identified as gifted, the percentage of students receiving gifted services.

All Grades

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

0.0%

38.9% 38.3%

43.8%

0.0%

48.6%

0.0%

Creative Thinking Math Reading Science Social Studies

Superior Cognitive Visual and PerformingArts



Screening

This chart shows the percentage of students screened for gifted abilities this school year.

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

14.8% 14.7%

0.0% 0.0%

7.5%

Reading Math Social Studies ScienceSuperior Cognitive

Acceleration

Number of SubjectAccelerated Students:

0

Number of Whole-GradeAccelerated Students:

0



ProgressThis is your district’s average progress for its students in math andreading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in ayear. It answers the question – Did the students get a year’s worth ofgrowth? Did they get more? Did they get less?

Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADE

CGRADE Overall

Comingin 2018

GRADE High School

DGRADE Gifted Students

FGRADE Students with Disabilities

FGRADE Students in the Lowest 20% in Achievement

This measures the progress for all students in math and reading,grades 4-8.

A High School measure of progress will be reported in the 2014-15school year.

This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading,math, and/or superior cognitive ability.

This measures the progress for students with disabilities.

This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 20%statewide in reading and math achievement.

Test GradeProgress Score

EnglishLanguage Arts Mathematics All Tests

All Grades

4th Grade

5th Grade

6th Grade

7th Grade

8th Grade

High School

0.63 -0.57 0.10

0.35 -0.92 -0.33

-3.04 1.22 -1.40

-1.20 -0.48 -1.14

2.86 0.29 2.19

2.27 -1.50 0.92

4.46 2.23 4.72

This table shows the Progress scores by test grade and subject, and includes up to three years of data as available.

Although Progress scores are notassigned letter grades at this level ofdetail, the grading scale applied at theOverall (All Students, All Tests) level is:

A = 2.00 and upB = 1.00 to 1.99C = -1.00 to 0.99D = -2.00 to -1.01F = below -2.00

Progress Details

NRGRADE High Mobility

For districts and schools with a mobility rate of 25% or higher, thismeasures the progress of a subset of students that have been in thedistrict for at least two years. This measure will not be included in theProgress component grade.



Progress vs. Performance Index

This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's Performance Index results (horizontalaxis) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical axis). The size of the bubble represents the size of the

student subgroup.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

OverallStudents w/ DisabilitiesLowest 20%Gifted

A

B

C

D

F

G r a d e

Performance Index



Gap ClosingThis grade shows how well all students are doing in your district inreading, math, and graduation. It answers the question – Is everystudent succeeding, regardless of income, race, ethnicity, or disability? Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADE

Graduation RateMathReadingCGRADE Annual Measurable Objectives

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of student groups to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achievesthat goal in reading, math and graduation – and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels.

The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 2015 AMO for Reading is 71.3%, for Math is 65.0%, and for Graduation Rate is 80.5%.

0 20 40 60 80 100

83.6

82.9

73.4

28.4

White All StudentsEcon Disadvantage Students w/ Disabilities

AMO Points

75.0%

0

20

40 60

80

100

75

A = 90.0 - 100.0%B = 80.0 - 89.9%C = 70.0 - 79.9%D = 60.0 - 69.9%F = 0.0 - 59.9%

0 20 40 60 80 100

76.8

76.3

64.8

22.3

White All StudentsEcon Disadvantage Students w/

Disabilities

0 20 40 60 80 100

93.2

92.0

82.1

White All Students Econ Disadvantage

Subgroups with fewer than 30 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs.



Graduation RateThis grade represents the percentage of students whom entered the9th grade and graduated 4 and 5 years later.

Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADE

D =

B =

0

20

40

60

80

100

92.0 93.9

82.2

District SimilarDistrictsState Average

4-Year Rate

0

20

40

60

80

10096.6 94.4

84.5

District SimilarDistrictsState Average

5-Year Rate

BGRADE

4-Year Graduation RateThe 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2014 who graduated within four years, i.e. students whoentered the 9th grade in 2011 and graduated by 2014.

AGRADE

5-Year Graduation RateThe 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2013 who graduated within five years, i.e. students whoentered the 9th grade in 2010 and graduated by 2014.

92.0%

96.6%

A = 93.0 - 100.0%89.0 - 92.9%

C = 84.0 - 88.9%79.0 - 83.9%

F = 0.0 - 78.9%

A = 95.0 - 100.0%B = 90.0 - 94.9%C = 85.0 - 89.9%D = 80.0 - 84.9%F = 0.0 - 79.9%

0

20

40 60

80

100

0

20

40 60

80

100



Graduation Rate Trend

90%

91%

92%

93%

94%

95%

96%

97%

90.0%

92.2%

91.1%

96.0%

92.0%

90.5%

94.8%

93.0%

96.6%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

4-Year 5-Year

Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because thenecessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year.



K-3 LiteracyThis grade answers the question - Are more students learning to readin kindergarten through third grade?

Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADE

0

20

40 60

80

100

FGRADE

26.7%

K-3 LiteracyImprovement

8 out of 30

Not On-Track atPoint A

Improving to On-Trackat Point B

Kindergarten ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2013 - 2014

< 10 to1st Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2014 - 2015

< 10

1st Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2013 - 2014

< 10 to2nd Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2014 - 2015

< 10

2nd Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2013 - 2014

< 10 to3rd Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2014 - 2015

< 10

3rd Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2014 - 2015

< 10 to3rd Grade ReadingOAA, School Year

2014 - 2015< 10

Deduction for 3rd graders who did not pass OAA and werenot on a Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan

NC

Totals 30 8

Details of Measure

of those students reached proficiencyon the 3rd grade OAA.NC

< 10 third grade students were not on-trackthis year.

< 10

NC of those students improved to on-track in 3rd grade.

second grade students were not on-track last year.

< 10

NC of those students improved to on-track in 2nd grade.

first grade students were not on-tracklast year.

< 10

NC of those students improved to on-track in 1st grade.

kindergarten students were not on-tracklast year.

In Your District...

A = 82.6 - 100.0%B = 64.9 - 82.5%C = 47.2 - 64.8%D = 29.5 - 47.1%F = 0.0 - 29.4%



Percentage On-Track in Reading Diagnostic

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

94.2%

90.4%

88.6%

88.8%

5.8%

9.6%

11.4%

11.3%

KindergartenDiagnostic

First GradeDiagnostic

Second GradeDiagnostic

Third GradeDiagnostic

On- TrackNotOn-Track

Third Grade Reading Guarantee

Ohio's Third Grade Reading Guarantee ensures that students are successful inreading before moving on to fourth grade. Schools must provide supports forstruggling readers in early grades. If a child appears to be falling behind inreading, the school will immediately start a Reading Improvement andMonitoring Plan. The program ensures that every struggling reader gets thesupport he or she needs to learn and achieve.

Students have multiple opportunities to meet promotion requirements includingmeeting a minimum promotion score on the third grade state reading tests givenin the fall and spring. Students have an additional opportunity to take the stateassessment in the summer, as well as a district-determined alternativeassessment.

The Parent Roadmap is available to help parents understand how the ThirdGrade Reading Guarantee applies to your child.How many third graders met the Third Grade Reading

Guarantee requirements for promotion to 4th grade?98.7%

How many third graders scored proficient on the state Readingtest?

86.1%This chart shows the overall percentage of students that were on-track/not-on-track for each

grade level reading diagnostic in 2014-2015.



Prepared for SuccessThis grade answers the question – Are students who graduate fromyour district ready for college or a career? There are many ways toshow that graduates are prepared. Coming in

2016

COMPONENT GRADE

How Prepared was Your 2014 Graduating Class?

Districts and schools have long-term impacts on student outcomes. The Prepared forSuccess component provides information on how schools prepare students for differentpathways of college and career success. It also provides insights on how those students

do once they leave high school. What happens beyond the diploma is an importantindicator of how well schools are preparing students.

The University System of Ohio provides district reports on enrollment and remediation ofhigh school graduates attending in-state, public colleges and universities.

What Percentage of the 2012 GraduatingClass Entered College within Two Years? 58.6%

58.6%

41.4%

Outcomes after High School Graduation

64.4%

29.8%

4.8%

3.7%

19.2%

0.5%

14.4%

14.9%

17.6%

ACT: Participation

ACT: RemediationFree

SAT: Participation

SAT: RemediationFree

Honors Diploma

Industry-RecognizedCredential

Advanced Placement:Participation

AP: Exam Score of 3or Better

Dual EnrollmentCredit

Note: These data represent students in the 4-year graduation rate, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2011.

InternationalBaccalaureate

IB: Exam Score of 4or Better

0.0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

0.0%

https://www.ohiohighered.org/data-reports/college-readiness



Superintendent: Joseph A. KnollAddress: 10320 Moulin Ave NE County:

Phone: (330) 823-7458Stark

Alliance OH 44601-5906Directory information current as of the 2014-2015 Report Card publication date Alliance City CTPD

Career TechPlanning District:

Your District's Students

AverageDaily

Enrollment:

2,286

Enrollment by Subgroup

Am. Indian / Alaskan Native

Asian or Pacific Islander

Black, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic

Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic

Students with Disabilities

Economically Disadvantaged

Limited English Proficiency

Migrant

Enrollment # Enrollment %

NC

NC

1.8%42

2.0%45

2.0%45

93.8%2,145

12.9%294

40.0%914

1.6%36

1.0%22

NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group

Number ofLimitedEnglish

ProficiencyStudents

Excluded fromAccountabilityCalculations:

--

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1.8% 2.0% 2.0%

93.8%

12.9%

40.0%

1.6% 1.0%

American Indian orAlaska...

Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic

Students withDisabilities

Economic Disadvantage Limited EnglishProficiency

Migrant

Enrollments of less than 10 students are not shown.

State and federal law require an annual assessment of Limited English Proficient (LEP) students to measuretheir English language proficiency. The Ohio Test of English Language Acquisition (OTELA) is theassessment used in Ohio to gauge LEP students' growth in learning English. For information about yourdistrict's OTELA results, see the Department of Education's web site at http://education.ohio.gov.



Attendance

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%95.3% 94.9%94.7%93.4%95.4%94.7%94.2%95.8%

All Students American Indian orAlaska...


Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic Students withDisabilities

Economic Disadvantage

Limited EnglishProficiency

Attendance Rate is not shown if enrollment is less than 10.

ChronicAbsenteeism

Rate:

8.8%


All Students



Black, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic

Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic




Migrant

Male

Female 95.3%

95.3%

93.6%

95.8%

94.2%

94.7%

95.4%

93.4%

94.7%

94.9%

NC

NC

95.3%

Attendance Rate



0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

9.2%

25.5%

66.3%

16.0%

6.4%13.1%

15.0%

72.8%

86.6%

All Students American Indian orAlaska...


Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic Students withDisabilities


Limited EnglishProficiency

Migrant

This chart shows the percentage of students who, because they movedinto or out of the district, did not spend a majority of the school year

within the district.

All Students



Black, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic

Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic


Economically Disadvantaged


Migrant

District Mobility %

9.2%

NC

NC

25.5%

66.3%

16.0%

6.4%

13.1%

15.0%

72.8%

86.6%


Mobility Rates by Subgroup



Your District's Teachers

Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree

Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's DegreePercentage of core academic subject and elementaryclasses not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

Percentage of core academic subject and elementaryclasses taught by properly certified teachersPercentage of core academic subject elementary andsecondary classes taught by teachers with temporary,conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure

All Schools in theDistrict

High PovertySchools

Low PovertySchools

100.0

58.3

0

100

0

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

----

-- --

-- --

A district's high poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of the district's economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those rankedin the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile, or in neither quartile.


Attendance Rate

95.2%

Average Salary

$49,132

Average Years ofExperience

13Lead or Senior

Teachers

2.0Your District's PrincipalsNumber of Teachers by Program Area

General Education 95.9

Gifted and Talented 2.0

Career-Technical Programs 8.5

Art Education K-8 1.0

Music Education K-8 4.6

Physical Education K-8 4.0

ELL Instructional Program 0.0

Special Education 16.0

Percentage of principals with atleast a Bachelor's Degree 100.0%

Percentage of principals with atleast a Master's Degree 100.0%



44.8%

51.5%

3.7%

Skilled Accomplished DevelopingIneffective Not Complete

57.1%

42.9%

Skilled Accomplished DevelopingIneffective Not Complete

Teacher Evaluations Principal Evaluations



Wellness and Physical Education

The extent to which students are successful inmeeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's

physical education standards

Moderate Success

Compliance with the federalrequirement for implementing a

local wellness policy

Elected toadminister BMI

screening

Participation inPhysical Activity

Pilot Program

School Choice Options: Place of Enrollment for Students Residing in the District

Districts and STEM Schools

1,986 students enrolled in the districtwhere they lived

160 students enrolled in anotherpublic district through OpenEnrollment

24 students enrolled in anotherpublic district by means otherthan Open Enrollment

Community Schools

56 students enrolled in an onlinecommunity school

6 students enrolled in a site-based community school

4 students enrolled in a DropoutPrevention and RecoveryProgram (online or site-based)*

Non-Public Schools*

0 students participated in theEdChoice Scholarship orCleveland Scholarship Program

3 students participated in theEdChoice Expansion Program

4 students participated in theOhio Autism Scholarship or JonPeterson Special NeedsScholarship Program

*ODE does not collect and cannot reportinformation on district residents who are non-

voucher students attending a non-public school.

The School Choice Options data is a set of nine counts describing the place of enrollment for students residing in the school district, captured as a snapshotof a single day in the school year. Web links provide further information about certain options.

No data returned for this view. Thismight be because the applied filterexcludes all data.

Fine Arts Courses Offered

No Fine Arts Coursesare offered by thisdistrict.

*Students included in Dropout Prevention andRecovery Program counts are also included in

either the online or site-based communityschool counts.



Financial DataThese measures answer several questions about spending and performance. How much is spent on Classroominstruction? How much, on average, is spent on each student? What is the source of the revenue? How do thesemeasures compare to other districts and schools?

Comparison Group: Enrollment between 1000 and 2499

Classroom Spending Data

66.7%

33.3%

What percent of funds arespent on classroom

instruction?

65.1%

How does this district rank incomparison to other districts

of similar size?

195 out of 276

Comparison Group State

65.1%

34.9%

67.3%

32.7%

Classroom Instruction Non-Classroom Instruction

District

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

A rank of 1 indicates the highest percent spenton classroom instruction.

Spending per Pupil Data

District State

Operating Spending per Pupil $7,958 $9,228

Classroom Instruction $5,178 $6,211

Non-Classroom Spending $2,780 $3,016

$4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000

District

State

Marlington Local IS NOT among the 20% of public districts with thelowest operating expenditures per pupil

Marlington Local IS NOT among the 20% of public districts with thehighest academic performance index scores.

Note: District financial data do not include data associated with community schools that are sponsored by the school district.


Spending and PerformanceThis measure answers the question – what is the relationship of average spending per student to performance, and how does that compare to similar districts and schools?

Similar Districts

P e r f o r m a n c e I n d e x

Spending per Pupil

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

110.0

120.0

$0 $4,000

$8,000

$12,000

$16,000

$20,000

$24,000

$28,000

$32,000

All Districts


Spending per Pupil

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

110.0

120.0

$0 $4,000

$8,000

$12,000

$16,000

$20,000

$24,000

$28,000

$32,000

Comparison Group

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

110.0

120.0

$0 $4,000

$8,000

$12,000

$16,000

$20,000

$24,000

$28,000

$32,000


Spending per Pupil


Source of Revenue

Source of Funds District State Total

Local

State

Federal

Other Non-Tax

Total

$8,004,477 32.7%

$11,464,361 46.9%

$1,581,150 6.5%

$3,415,390 14.0%

$24,465,378 100.0%

$8,465,909,321 39.4%

$9,920,347,064 46.1%

$1,617,676,379 7.5%

$1,492,334,587 6.9%

$21,496,267,351 100.0%

33%

47%

7%

14%

Local StateFederal Other Non-Tax

District

39%

8%

46%

7%

39%

8%

46%

7%

Local FederalState Other Non-Tax

State



Superintendent:Address:

Joseph A. Knoll10320 Moulin Ave NEAlliance OH 44601-5906

Phone:County:

(330) 823-7458Stark

Your District's Schools

SchoolAchievement

IndicatorsMet

PerformanceIndex

Progress

Overall Gifted

Lowest20%

Achieve

Studentswith

Disabilities

Gap ClosingAnnual

MeasurableObjectives

Graduation Rate4-Year

GraduationRate

5-YearGraduation

Rate

K-3 Literacy

K-3Literacy

Lexington Elementary School C B C D C C F NR NR DMarlboro Elementary School B C C C NR NR B NR NR NR

Marlington High School B B NR NR NR NR A B A NRMarlington Middle School C A B C F F F NR NR NR

Washington Elementary School B B F C C F B NR NR NR

Main.aspx?server=edumstrisd02&project=ReportCard&evt=2048001&documentID=CEBC698F4338B9EBCF0B70BEB900086F&elementsPromptAnswers=12464469479F3EB7271EAC9F60825699;12464469479F3EB7271EAC9F60825699%3A020230&hiddenSections=header,dockTop,dockLeft,footer,path&uid=guest





district pdf reportirn: 049882 printed on august 21, 2016 page 4 of 30 2014 - 2015 report card for...

Documents