district implementation of pbis c-1 rob horner brian megert university of oregon springfield...
DESCRIPTION
Goals Define the role of district coordination, systems and supports when implementing and sustaining of PBIS. Provide one example of a district that is successfully implementing PBIS.TRANSCRIPT
District Implementation of PBISC-1
Rob Horner Brian MegertUniversity of Oregon Springfield School District
Maximizing Your Session Participation
Work with your team
Consider 3 questions:
– How does this session fit with where we are in PBIS implementation?
– What do I hope to learn?– What will I do with what I learned?
Goals
• Define the role of district coordination, systems and supports when implementing and sustaining of PBIS.
• Provide one example of a district that is successfully implementing PBIS.
Implementation• Children/families are the unit of impact
• Schools are the unit of analysis
• Districts are the unit of implementation
District Role in PBIS Implementation
ExternalTA
TrainingSupport
District Role in PBIS Implementation
Effective Districts
• Initial Implementation• Scaling• Sustainability/ Continuous Improvement
District Role in PBIS ImplementationFeature Description
District Leadership Team • Composition: authority, content knowledge, grade-level representation, data systems.
• Meeting: Meets at least MonthlyVisibility and Dissemination • Faculty & Staff
• Families & Community• School Board
Political Support • Annual report to Board• Twice –a- year report to superintendent/ cabinet
Policy and Alignment • Social behavior defined as core outcome• Process in place for managing alignment of initiatives
Personnel Readiness • Selection of all personnel includes “… preference is given to individuals with documented expertise and experience in implementation of multi-tiered systems of academic and behavior support”
• Orientation of new personnel includes MTSS• Evaluation of all personnel includes implementation
of MTSS.
District Role in PBIS ImplementationFeature Description
Training Capacity/Professional Development
• District personnel with ability to train new teams• Train in Tier I, Tier II, Tier III
Coaching and Technical Assistance
• Coaching support for new personnel and new teams• Coaching at Tier I, Tier II, Tier III
Evaluation • Lead implementation of data systems for monitoring student outcomes: behavior, math, reading.
• Lead collection and reporting implementation fidelity data
Content Expertise in Behavior Support
• District personnel with knowledge of behavioral theory/ Function-based Support
Local Demonstration Sites • Schools with documented success in both implementation fidelity and improved student outcomes.
Objectives
• Define purpose of SPS and UO collaboration to implement PBIS in five model elementary/middle demonstration sites, and one high school.
• Summarize activity and outcomes for 2014-15.• Identify specific aspects of district composition.
Purpose
• The collaboration between the University of Oregon (UO) and Springfield Public Schools (SPS) is organized around two broad goals targeted for achievement between 2013 and 2018.
– Goal 1: Document five “Model Demonstration” schools implementing PBIS at all three tiers with high fidelity and documented benefit for students.
– Goal 2: Establish the capacity of SPS to implement and sustain PBIS across all schools in the district
Build on Existing RtI systems:
Teams/ Use of Data/ Multi-Tiered Support
Springfield Public Schools (Oregon)
• 10,600 total student population• 12 elementary schools• 4 middle schools• 2 comprehensive high schools• 2 charters• 1,450 students with disabilities• 68% students in poverty
2015 Implementation Activities
• Five Model Demonstration Schools….
• Implement PBIS– Tier I PBIS trained, coached and implemented 2013-14 (Two full day events… two ½ day)– Tier II PBIS trained, coached and implemented 2014-15 (Two full day events… ½ day team)– Tiered Fidelity Inventory(TFI): January 2014, May, 2014
• Coaching Support– SPS coaches (5 individuals with part-time PBIS responsibilities)– UO coaches (3 part-time support staff)
• Data Systems– Implement SWIS– Implement CICO-SWIS– Use TFI to assess implementation– Use DCA to assess district capacity
Team Focus: Student Centered TeamWho: People who know the student and know behavior support When: As neededWhat Data: individual student behavior data
Team Focus: Individual Support System•Who: similar to targeted•When: Analyze Data 2x/Month•What Data: ISIS-SWIS - individual student behavior data, prior CICO data, health of individual supports program/system
Team Focus: Targeted Supports Systems•Who: Representative from universal team, admin, people responsible for student supports
•When: Analyze Data 2x/Month•What Data: CICO-SWIS, point card data, student referrals, health of tier-2 programs/systems
Team Focus: Universal Supports Systems •Who: Representative Team across grade levels and specialty•When: Analyze Data at least 1x/Month•What Data: SWIS, Office Referrals with Problem Statement, health of tier-1 programs/systems
Team Roles for ALL Teams
Administrator Data Analyst Facilitator Minute Taker
2014-15 Coordination
• SPS Implementation Leadership Team• UO Faculty• Special Programs Director• Level Directors• School Psychologists*• Special Programs Facilitators/TOSAs*
Outcomes 2014-15
• Is PBIS being Implemented?– Tier I– Tier II– Tier III
• Is the District building Capacity to Scale and Sustain PBIS?
• Is implementation of PBIS benefiting students?
Tier I PBIS Implementation: Model Demonstrations
2013-14 and 2014-15
Dos Rios Guy Lee Maple Riverbend Hamlin0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
'Jan 14 'May 14 'Oct 14 'May 15
School A School B School C School D School E
Tier I PBIS Implementation: Scaling
Centennial Douglas Gardens Mt. Vernon Page Ridgeview Thurston Elem Walterville Yolanda0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Oct 14 May 15
School 1 School 3 School 3 School 4 School 5 School 6 School 7 School 8
Tier IIPBIS Implementation: Demonstration
Dos Rios Guy Lee Maple Riverbend Hamlin0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Jan 15 May 15
School A School B School C School D School E
Tier IIIPBIS Implementation: Demonstration
Dos Rios Guy Lee Maple Riverbend Hamlin0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
May 15
School A School B School C School D School E
13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18
Cohort 1 5 schools
Train Sustain
Train SustainTrain Sustain
Cohort 24 schools
Train Sustain
Train Sustain
Train Sustain
Cohort 33 schools
Train Sustain
Train Implement SustainTrain Sustain
Cohort 44 schools
Train Sustain
Train Sustain
Train
High Schools Explore Train
Train Train
SystemsOf Support
3 Coaches Add 2 coaches = 5
Add time to coaches FTE
District Leadership Team Planning and Coordinating Efforts
Data System
• SWIS implemented in Demonstration schools• SPS personnel implemented SWIS in Scaling
schools• ------------------------------------------------------• CICO – SWIS implemented in Demonstration
Schools
Student Outcomes
• Office Discipline Referrals
Median: Elementary
Median: Middle
Risk Index 1.78
Risk Index 1.26
Risk Index
2.0
Risk Index 1.14
Risk Index 1.50
CICO Outcomes
Student Outcomes Summary
• SPS schools are now able to collect, summarize and use data for decision-making
• Data from 2014-15 shows variability, and development. This will be good data to compare with results for 2015-16
• CICO is being implemented with effect in four of the six schools. Again, real effects will be assessed during the coming year.
District Capacity• The District Capacity Assessment
– Leadership• Leadership structure• Planning
– Competency• Selection• Training• Coaching• Performance Feedback
– Organization• Data Systems• Facilitative Administration• Organization Systems
District Capacity
Ongoing Supports for PBIS Implementation
• Initial administration of TFI with potential demonstration schools
• Allowing PBIS teams additional time for planning
• Presentations to school board and cabinet• Building upon previously implemented RtI
structures• Relatively low cost through coaching structures
Plan for 2015-16• Sustain Tier I PBIS implementation
• Scale up Tier II PBIS implementation– Tier I in all middle schools– Tier II in all elementary schools
• Establish Tier III with Demonstration Schools• One full day , Two ½-day trainings, SPS Coaches
• Expand use of SWIS and CICO-SWIS• Focus on use of data now that data are available• Introduce ISIS-SWIS in Demonstration Schools
• High School Implementation at T High• Freshman Success
• Build District Capacity• Selection, Evaluation• Data Systems• Leadership Team
Discussion