distribution and recognition nancy fraser – claims for social justice/equality based on ...
TRANSCRIPT
MONEY, SEX AND POWER
EQUALITY AND THE POLITICS OF (RE)DISTRIBUTION:
WEEK 2
2013-2014
Distribution and recognition
Nancy Fraser – claims for social justice/equality based on
socio-economic redistribution legal or cultural recognition
This week (re)distribution and equalityNext week recognition and equality
Lecture outline
Today our discussion of (re)distribution and equality will be in three parts:
The politics of redistribution
How to measure inequality
The relationship between economic inequality and power
Feminism and equality
Feminist movement of 1960s and 1970s demanded
equal sexual rights and the end of the sexual double standard
equal political representationequal access to education
Liberal feminists had already made demands to:
improve access to material resources Improve women’s bargaining power Reduce men’s power over women
Marxism and equality
Redistribution of resources also central to Marxist/socialist tradition but focus was on need to redistribute resources on basis of class; gender equality would follow from this.
Engels – women’s participation in labour force key to gender equality
Socialist feminist and liberal feminists agreed about importance of women’s integration into the labour force
Need
In Communist Manifesto
‘From each according to his [sic] need, to each according to his ability’
Idea of need
Equal distribution may not be a socially just distribution
People’s needs differ
The family wage 19th century struggle for family wage
was about distribution of resources
Fighting for redistribution from capitalist class to working class
From women to men within the working class
Labour movement demand for family wage was opposed to feminist demands for equal pay
Individualisation and globalisation
Increased women’s participation in the workforce
Decline of male-breadwinner family model
Beck, Giddens, Castells, Bauman argue that individualisation and globalisation have increased women’s independence
Increased women’s bargaining power in family
Thereby undermining patriarchy
Problems of measuring inequality
Demand for equality in terms of income and wealth is distributional equality – in principal easy to measure
But which unit of comparison should we use? Family-household (‘black box’) or individual?
We can’t assume resources are equally distributed within households
Some individuals need more than others, e.g. of disabilities
Does inequality matter?
Anne Phillips argues that it does
What are the effects of inequality on power?
Women have different interests because gender cuts across hierarchies of class, social status and ‘race’/ethnicity
Increase in economic power/ decrease in economic inequality may not translate directly into power
‘Power to’ and ‘power over’
1. ‘Power to’ Power to is the ability to do things – to act Trade off submission to power of others over
them in exchange for enhanced power to do certain things
Access to resources gives women power to Enhances negotiating position within household
2. ‘Power over’ Greater economic equality between women and men
has given some women experience of power over others, e.g. as managers
Also as employers within the domestic sphere
Inequalities still exist Globally, “Women make up 70% of the world's working hours
and earn only 10% of the world's income and half of what men earn” (Guardian, 27th March 2013).
In the UK, over all forms of employment, the pay gap between men’s and women’s hourly earnings is 20% according to a European Commission report out this year (EC, Tackling the Gender Pay Gap in the EU 2013) .
In the UK disabled women experience a 31% pay penalty compared to non-disabled men (EHRC, 2010).
60% of women reaching state pension age in 2008 were entitled to less than the full basic state pension, compared to 10% of men (Ibid.).
Only 1 in 4 Bangladeshi and Pakistani women, works and almost half of Bangladeshi (49%) and Pakistani (44%) women are looking after the family or home, compared to 20% or fewer of other groups (Ibid.).
Only 1 in 40 households today are defined as overcrowded – however female-headed households are four times as likely as average to be overcrowded (Ibid.).
Conclusions
Equality/redistribution is one of the aims of both ‘second wave’ feminism and socialism.
Measuring inequality is problematic. While it’s easiest to measure income inequality the question remains: what unit of measurement should we use?
There is a relationship between economic inequality and power . Men generally have greater decision-making power, this relates to their greater earning capacity and therefore access to resources.
We need to distinguish between ‘power to’ and ‘power over’.
Despite 40 years of Equal Pay Act, the gender pay gap persists.