discovery of d sj (2463) + (part ii) jc wang cleo meeting 06/20/03 authors dave cinabro selina li...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Discovery of DsJ(2463)+
(part II)
JC WangCLEO Meeting
06/20/03
Authors
Dave CinabroSelina Li
Sheldon StoneJon Urheim
Jianchun Wang
Committees
Roy Briere (chair)
David MillerDavid BessonJohn Yelton
900
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 2
BaBar Discovery
BaBar observed a narrow Ds0 resonance at 2.317 GeV, possibly a JP = 0+ state (hep-ex/0304021). They reconstructed 1267 53 events, with P(Ds0) > 3.5 GeV using 91 fb data.
M( Ds0 )
BaBar
M( Ds0 )
They also noticed a peak at 2.46 GeV. “This mass corresponds to the overlap region of the Ds
* Ds and Ds(2317)Ds0 signal bands that, because of the small width of both mesons, produces a narrow peak in the Ds mass distribution that survives a Ds
* selection” .
Reflections?
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 3
Possible Explanations Four Ds**(L=1) states: JP = 0+, 1+, 1+ & 2+. One 1+ & 2+ seen. Others are
predicted to be above DK threshold and have large ~200 MeV widths. This state is way below DK threshold.
The Dso decays from an initial cs state violates iso-spin conservation. Hence the decay is suppressed and the decay width is narrow. So the low mass ensures the narrow width.
Bardeen, Eichten and Hill (hep-ph/0305049) couple chiral perturbation theory with a quark model representing HQET. They infer that Ds*(2317) is the 0+ state. The theory also predict the existence of the 1+ partner of this state, and has mass splitting identical to that of Ds*(2112) and Ds ( M(1+) M(0+) = M(1) M(0) ). The branching fraction of other possible modes are also calculated.
Many other theoretical explanations appeared (see references in the paper): For example, it could be a D / DK molecule (see Adam Szczepaniak’s talk).
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 4
The Ds0 Final State
Fit resultN = 165 20
= 8.0 1.3 MeVM> = 349.4 1.0 MeV
Brief selection criteria
All CLEO II and II.V data P(Ds0) > 3.5 GeV
Ds, KK
|cos| > 0.3 Invariant mass cuts ~ 2.5 Photons in good barrel.
Ds*
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 5
The Ds*0 Final State
Fit resultN = 55.3 10.1
= 6.1 1.0 MeVM> = 349.8 1.3 MeV
Brief selection criteria
All CLEO II and II.V data P(Ds*0) > 3.5 GeV
Ds, KK
|cos| > 0.3 Invariant mass cuts ~ 2.5 Photons in good barrel.
Ds* sideband
Ds* signal
!?
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 6
Ds0 Scatter Plot
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 7
Ds0 Monte Carlo SimulationsDs(2463)Ds*0
signal MC
= 6.5 0.2 MeV
Ds(2317) does “feed up” to the Ds(2463) by attaching to a random .
However, the probability is low (~17% with floating width, ~9% with width fixed to that of data), and the width is 14.9 MeV rather than 6.5.
Ds(2317)Ds0 signal + random
= 14.9 0.6 MeVMuch wider than 6.1±1.0 MeV
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 8
Feed Down: Ds(2463) Candidates Reconstructed as Ds(2317)
All events in the Ds*0 mass
spectrum are used to show the Ds(2463) signal “feed down” to
the Ds(2317) spectrum.
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 9
Reconstruct Ds0 from MC
Ds(2317)Ds0 signal MC
= 6.5 0.3 MeV
Ds(2463)Ds*0 signal with photon skipped
= 14.9 0.4 MeV
Ds(2463) also “feed down” to Ds(2317) with very large probability (~0.84 with
width fixed to that of data). The width is 14.9 MeV rather than 6.5 MeV.
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 10
Yield Unfolding
R0 reconstructed DsJ(2317)Ds0 excluding feed-down.
R1 reconstructed DsJ(2463)Ds*0 excluding feed-up.
N0 = R0 + feed-down = R0 + R1 f1
N1 = R1 + feed-up = R1 + R0 f0
R0 = 154.8 23.4
R1 = 41.2 11.5
f feed-up probability relative to true Ds0 yield. (0.091±0.007±0.015)
f feed-down probability relative to true Ds*0 yield. (0.84±0.04±0.10)
N0 number of events extracted from fit to Ds0 mass spectrum. (189.518.9)
N1 number of events extracted from fit to Ds*0 mass spectrum. (55.310.1)
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 11
Double Gaussian Fit Fit the spectrum with double
Gaussian functions for the peak.
Narrow Width
Broad width
Single Gaussian
Data 6.01.2 16.56.3 8.01.3
MC 6.00.3 14.90.4
Eve
nts/
5MeV
/c2
Determine the mass without the effect of reflection.
<M> = (350.0 ± 1.2 ± 1.0) MeV
M = 2318.5 ± 1.7 MeV
The amount of reflection in the fit is consistent with calculation.
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 12
Sideband Subtraction
Sideband subtraction
Unfoldingmethod
Number of events 45.7 ± 11.6 41.2 ± 11.1
M(Ds*0) M(Ds*) in MeV
351.2 ± 1.7 349.8 ± 1.3
Signal width () in MeV
5.5 ± 1.1 6.1 ± 1.0
<M> = (351.2 ± 1.7 ± 1.0) MeV
M = 2463.6 ± 2.1 MeV
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 13
Significance of Ds(2463) Signal
Fit the spectrum with:
Single Gaussian for true signal.
Sideband spectrum for feedup and part of combinatorial bkg.
2nd order polynomial for bkg.
We can get the significance of signal: sqrt( 32.4) = 5.7
Number of true signals: 42.4 9.7
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 14
Production Rate of DsJ Mesons
Yield(P>3.5)
Efficiency(%)
ProductionRatio
Ds(2463)Ds(Ds)
Ds(2317)Ds
DsDs
Ds(1969)
The final DsJ candidates are required to be P>3.5 GeV.
Ds is reconstructed in Ds, KKmode. The efficiency is
the value in the table times BR of the decay chain listed.
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 15
Kinematically Allowed DsJ Decay ChannelsDecay Channel Spin parity Possible JP of DsJ
Ds(2317)
Ds0
Ds , OZI suppressed
Ds
Ds0
Ds
Ds(2463)
Ds0
Ds OZI
suppressed
Ds
Ds 0
Ds OZI suppressed
Ds
Ds(2317) 0
Ds(2317)
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 16
Search For Ds and DsDecay odes
N(2317) =
N(2463) =
Ds(2317) Ds(2463)
N(2317) =
N(2463) =
Ds(2317)
Ds(2463)
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 17
Search For Dsand Ds(2317) Decay Modes
Ds(2317)
Ds(2463)
N(2317) =
N(2463) =
Ds(2463)
N(2463) =
Ds(2463)Ds(2317)(Ds0)
has reflection from mode
Ds(2463) Ds*0(Ds)0
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 18
The 90% C.L. Upper Limits
Decay Channel Yield Efficiency (%)
Ratio (90% C.L.)
Prediction
Ds(2317)
Ds0 0.6
Ds 2.3 0.8
Ds 13 0.1
Ds0 3.9 0.3
Ds 5.2 0.5
Ds(2463)
Ds0 12 0.2
Ds 7.7 0.3
Ds 5.4 1.5
Ds 17 0.4
Ds(2317) 3.0 0.1
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 19
Nature of Ds(2317) and Ds(2463)
Ds(2317) and Ds(2463) fit in well the quark model as 0+ and 1+ cs mesons except for maybe the mass.
Chiral perturbation + HQET lower mass.
Ds(2317) is below DK threshold. Ds(2463) is below D*K threshold and above DK, which is suppressed (1+).
The <M> measurements also back up chiral perturbation + HQET model.
It is nature to think that they are 0+ and 1+ Ds states.
Ds(2463)Ds0
<M> = (351.2 ± 1.7 ± 1.0) MeVM = 2463.6 ± 2.1 MeV
Width < 7.0 MeV at 90% C.L.
Ds(2317) Ds0
<M> = (350.0 ± 1.2 ± 1.0) MeVM = 2318.5 ± 1.7 MeV
Width < 7.0 MeV at 90% C.L.
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 20
Search For Ds+and Ds
+Modes
Ds(2317)Ds(2463)Ds(2317) Ds(2463)
Resonant Ds+or Ds
+ surely will be interesting for other models (e.g. D atom)
06/20/03 Jianchun (JC) Wang 21
Summary Confirmed DsJ
(2317): Mass = 2318.5 1.7 MeV/c2, <M> = (350.0 ± 1.2 ± 1.0) MeV Very narrow intrinsic width. Decaying to Ds 0 , as expected for JP = 0+.
Observed a new state DsJ(2463): Mass = 2463.6 2.1 MeV, <M> = (351.6 1.2 1.0) MeV. Very narrow intrinsic width. Decaying to Ds*0 , as expected for JP = 1+.
The results are compatible with model (Chiral perturbation+HQET) predictions of 0+ and 1+ Ds states, and mass splitting.
Obtained upper limits of branching fraction for the other decay modes relative to the observed states.
Submitted to PRD (hep-ex/0305100).