discovery and identi˜cation of oxidative stress biomarkers
TRANSCRIPT
Discovery and identi�cation of oxidative stress biomarkers in marine plankton using a new, open-source R package for lipidomicsJamie Collins 1,2 *, Bethanie Edwards 1,2,3, Kevin Becker 1, Helen Fredricks 1, and Benjamin A.S. Van Mooy 1
1 Department of Marine Chemistry & Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution2 MIT/WHOI Joint Program in Oceanography; 3 School of Oceanography, University of Hawaii at Manoa
Introduction: ROS and the algal lipidome
Oxidative stress exerts a profound impact on the lives of marine microbes, including eukary-otic phytoplankton. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) can function as inter- or intracellular signals, alter various cellular metabolisms, and dramatically transform the individual mole-cules that make up the algal cell.
As in terrestrial plants, the polar lipids of marine algae are a “front line” barrier in the battle against oxidative stress. Because these lipids are primary structural components of cell and or-ganelle membranes, they are particularly susceptible to chemical transformation by both inter- and extracellular ROS. The lipids transformed by ROS can be exploited as biomarkers for speci�c types of oxidative stress.
We use lipidomics to analyze hundreds of these biomarkers simultaneously with their unoxi-dized parent compounds. Patterns in their distribution, abundance, and chemical structure can be used to:
• Identify new biomarkers for vari-ous biological & abiotic stressors
• Localize the impact of oxidative stress within an ecosystem or single cell
• Examine the e�ect of ROS on bio-chemical pathways, microorgan-isms, and ecosystem-scale biogeo-chemistry
xcm
s3 and
CA
MER
A4
LOBSTAHS: An R package for lipidomics discovery
We developed LOBSTAHS1 (Lipid and Oxylipin Biomarker Screening through Adduct Hierarchy Sequences) to assist in the discovery and identi�cation of new lipid biomarkers for oxidative stress. LOBSTAHS is an open-source pack-age for R that uses a unique screening criteria to make compound identi�ca-tions in HPLC-MS data. LOBSTAHS is available via Bioconductor or GitHub. The package can be downloaded via the QR code at right. Improvements, suggestions, and database additions are welcome – just submit a bug report.
Incr
easi
ng c
on�d
ence
in c
ompo
und
assi
gnm
ents
LOBS
TAH
S1
Screened & annotated “high con�dence” dataset
available for analysis
Assign con�dence scoresAnnotate possible iso-
mers and isobaric masses
Screen assignments using adduct ion hierarchy se-
quences
Screen assignments by re-tention time according to
parent lipid class
Initial compound assign-ments from database(s)
Initial mass spectralfeature discovery
Retention time correctionPeak grouping
Eliminate 2° isotope peaks
Data acquisition: HPLC-ESI-MS2; high mass
accuracy & resolution
Complex dataset: Multiple samples across experi-mental treatments or
environmental gradients
OOH
Lipoxygenase enzyme
Lipoxygenase enzyme
AbioticAbiotic
BiologicalBiological+ O2+ O2
1O2 •OH
H2O2
1O2 •OH
H2O2
OOH
Summary & signi�cance
Shifts in the distribution, abundance, and chemical structure of lipids in (a) P. tricornu-tum and (b) the microbial community at Sta-tion ALOHA can tell us about the e�ects and targets of oxidative stress within the algal cell and within ecosystems.
• Extensive lipidome remodeling followed treatment with 150 µM H2O2 in Phaeodacty-lum tricornutum Additionally, oxidative stress promoted reallocation of biomass to triacylglycerols (TAG)
• At Station ALOHA, UVB radiation induced wholesale change in the oxidation state of the metalipidome
Onboard, user-cus-tomizable databases: 14,068* unique IPL,
lyso-IPL, ox-IPL, oxylipins, TAG, and
photosyntheticpigments
1 Collins et al. 2016, Anal. Chem. 88:7154-7162. 2 Modi�ed method of Hummel et al. 2011, Front. Plant Sci. 2:54. 3 Smith et al. 2006, Anal. Chem. 78:779-787; Tautenhahn et al. 2008, BMC Bioinformatics 9:504. 4 Kuhl et al. 2012, Anal. Chem. 84:283-289. 5 Gra� van Creveld et al. 2015, ISME 9:285-395. In the study, cultures of P. tricornutum were treated with varying concentrations of hydrogen peroxide to induce an oxidative stress response. Experimental methods are described in the reference. 6 DGCC, diacylglyceryl carboxyhydroxymethylcholine; DGDG, digalactosyldiacylglycerol; DGTS & DGTA, diacylglyceryl trimethylhomoserine and diacylglyceryl hydroxymethyl-trimethyl-β-alanine; IPL, intact polar lipid; ox-IPL, oxidized intact polar lipid; MGDG, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; SQDG, sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol; TAG, triacylglycerol 7 P≤0.05 (bold), P≤0.01 (*), P≤0.001 (**), and P≤0.0001 (***).. This research was supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through Grant GBMF3301 to B.A.S.V.M. This research was also funded in part by a grant to B.A.S.V.M. from the Simons Foundation and is a contribution of the Simons Collaboration on Ocean Processes and Ecology. J.R.C. acknowledges support from a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) STAR Graduate Fellowship (Fellowship Assistance Agreement No. FP-91744301-0).
https://github.com/vanmooylipidomics/LOBSTAHS/
mz
●
+ double bond
+ acyl
carbon
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
5 10 15 20
+2O+3O+4O
unoxidized+1O
Oxylipin
PEMGD
GPC SQ
DG
PG TAG
DGTS & A
DGD
G
DGCC
Lipid class6
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●●●
●
●●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●●●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●●
●● ●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●●●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
● ●●●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●●
●●
●●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
Corrected retention time (min)
Within each lipid class6, certain molecules are associated only with oxidative stress
TAG
26 1114526 11145
MGDG
27 198627 1986
SQDG
23 239623 2396
PG
5 4285 428
PC
49 4510649 45106
PE
32 2211732 22117
DGTS & DGTA
10 75410 75419 136519 1365
DGDG
191 145703191 145703
All lipids DGCC
66
Healthy organism
Lipids observed only in 0 µM H2O2 control
StressedLipidsobserved only under 150 µM H2O2
Lipids observed in both treatments
Results: Oxidative stress in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum
LOBSTAHS identi�es 1039 unique oxidized and unoxidized lipids that serve as potential biomarkers
Results in pure culture: Oxidative stress in the model marine diatom Phaeodactylum
We applied LOBSTAHS to lipid data from an experiment5 in which hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was used to induce oxidative stress in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum.
* ... and growing!
* @jamesrco; future: Moore/Sloan & WRF Data Science Fellow at University of Washington eScience Institute & School of Oceanography
New oxidized lipids are observed, but increase in oxidation state driven primarily by fall in concentration of unoxidized molecules
Results at Station ALOHA: E�ect of UVB exposure on a microbial metalipidome
We applied di�erent light screening treatments to large ( ~ 2 L ) volumes of un�ltered seawater collected at Station ALOHA, in the North Paci�c Ocean, during the SCOPE/C-MORE HOE-Legacy III cruise. LOBSTAHS was used to identify patterns & potential biomarkers of natural, daily-recurring UV radiation stress in HPLC-MS lipid data from three treatments. 1,747 di�erent oxidized and unoxidized compounds were identi�ed & quanti�ed.
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
252015105
Time (hours)
0 µM H2O2
150 µM H2O2
Frac
tion
peak
are
a ID
’d a
s TA
G
Stress induces TAG production
Initial + 9 h
Mol
e fr
actio
n id
enti�
edas
oxi
dize
d lip
id
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Dark− UVB+ UVB
UVB exposure leads to increase in overall oxidation state of metalipidome
Fold change from init. concentration
DGTS_DGTA 27:1 +3O, RT 10.87 min.DGTS_DGTA 30:5 +4O, RT 14.01 min.DGTS_DGTA 45:1 +1O, RT 19.51 min.SQDG 39:1 +1O, RT 19.67 min.DGDG 30:0, RT 19.68 min.DGTS_DGTA 43:0 +1O, RT 19.51 min.DGTS_DGTA 43:2 +1O, RT 18.78 min.DGTS_DGTA 34:1, RT 17.59 min.DGTS_DGTA 41:1 +1O, RT 18.76 min.DGTS_DGTA 43:1 +1O, RT 19.12 min.DGTS_DGTA 41:0 +1O, RT 19.09 min.DGTS_DGTA 39:0 +1O, RT 18.7 min.TAG 40:4, RT 18.65 min.PE 41:1, RT 17.47 min.PG 43:4 +3O, RT 12.51 min.PG 31:3 +3O, RT 8.98 min.PE 33:4 +1O, RT 18.15 min.TAG 39:4 +3O, RT 18.57 min.SQDG 46:8 +4O, RT 10.53 min.PG 30:4, RT 7.55 min.DGDG 32:1 +4O, RT 8.73 min.PG 37:8 +3O, RT 7.76 min.SQDG 39:7 +3O, RT 9.98 min.SQDG 42:6 +2O, RT 8.73 min.PE 31:3 +2O, RT 7.55 min.
Compounds exhibiting greatest relative increase in +UVB treatment
0 10 20 30
+ UVB
Dark control
− UVB
Notdetected
+ UVB
Dark control
− UVB
PG 41:5, RT 13.97 min.DGDG 36:9, RT 11.27 min.DGDG 28:1 +3O, RT 13.71 min.PC 38:6, RT 15.19 min.DGDG 34:7, RT 11.57 min.PG 41:5 +1O, RT 13.57 min.TAG 50:1, RT 21.84 min.TAG 50:2, RT 21.06 min.TAG 50:0, RT 22.77 min.TAG 52:1, RT 22.77 min.TAG 48:1, RT 21.06 min.TAG 48:0, RT 21.86 min.TAG 52:2, RT 21.83 min.SQDG 28:0, RT 12.07 min.PE 36:2, RT 17.2 min.DGDG 30:1, RT 14.07 min.SQDG 30:0, RT 13.32 min.MGDG 30:1, RT 14.92 min.SQDG 30:1, RT 12.3 min.PG 33:1, RT 14.81 min.PG 36:2, RT 15.24 min.SQDG 30:2, RT 11.36 min.
Fold change from init. concentration
-4 0 2 4-2
Compounds with greatest absolute change in concentration from t = 0
(at t +9 h)
(at t +9 h)