discourse analysis and grammar

34

Upload: amal-mustafa

Post on 08-Jul-2015

976 views

Category:

Education


7 download

DESCRIPTION

Discourse analysis and grammar

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Discourse analysis and grammar
Page 2: Discourse analysis and grammar
Page 3: Discourse analysis and grammar

Discourse analysis and grammar study familiar terms like :clause , pronoun, adverbial and conjunction and attempt to relate them to a less familiar set of terms : theme, rheme , reference and anaphoric , in order to make link between grammar and discourse.

Page 4: Discourse analysis and grammar

Spoken and written discourses display grammatical connexions between individual clauses and utterances.

These grammatical links can be classified under three broad types :

Reference or co- reference

Ellipsis/ substitution

Conjunction

Page 5: Discourse analysis and grammar

The term reference is traditionally used in semantics to define the relationship between a word and what it points to in the real world, but in Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) model it simply refers to the relationship between two linguistic expressions.

Reference as an act by which a speaker (or writer) uses language to enable a listener (or reader) to identify something.

Page 6: Discourse analysis and grammar
Page 7: Discourse analysis and grammar

(Looking outward- outside the text). The referent is not in the immediate context but is assumed by the speaker/writer to be part of a shared world, in terms of knowledge and experience.

Page 8: Discourse analysis and grammar

E.g.,

For he's a jolly good fellow and so say all of us.

As outsiders, we don’t know who the heis, but, most likely, the people involved in the celebration are aware of the he that is being referred to, and therefore, can find texture in the sentences.

Page 9: Discourse analysis and grammar

References to elements in the text are called Endophoric references.

Endophoric referencing can be divided into two areas:

Anaphoric

Cataphoric

Page 10: Discourse analysis and grammar

refers to any reference that “points backwards” to previously mentioned information in text. Usually items such : as he/she or them ,it, this , can be decoded without major difficulty.

e.g.,

Tom likes ice cream but Bill can’t eat it.

The teacher asked Ahmad to read so he read.

Page 11: Discourse analysis and grammar

Refers to any reference that “points forward” to information that will be presented later in the text.

For example:

When I met her, Mary looked ill.

Here is the news. The Prime Minister . . ….

Page 12: Discourse analysis and grammar

Functionally speaking, there are three main types of cohesive references:

Personal

Demonstrative

Comparative.

Page 13: Discourse analysis and grammar

Personal reference keeps track of function through the speech situation using noun, pronouns like “he, him, she, her”, etc. and possessive determiners like “mine, yours, his, hers”, etc.

E.g.,

The prime minister has resigned. Heannounced his decision this morning.

Page 14: Discourse analysis and grammar

Demonstrative reference keeps track of information through location using proximity references like “this, these, that, those, here, there, then, and the”.

E.g.,

I always buy a lot of books when I am in England. There are many lovely bookshops there.

Page 15: Discourse analysis and grammar

Comparative reference keeps track of identity and similarity through indirect references using adjectives like “same, equal, similar, different, else, better, more”, etc.

Adverbs like “so, such, similarly, otherwise, so, more”, etc.

E.g., A similar view is not acceptable. We did the same. So they said.

Page 16: Discourse analysis and grammar

Whereas referencing functions to link semantic meanings within text, substitution and ellipsis differ in that they operate as a linguistic link at the lexicogrammatical level.

Substitution and ellipsis are used when “a speaker or writer wishes to avoid the repetition of a lexical item and draw on one of the grammatical resources of the language to replace the item”.

Page 17: Discourse analysis and grammar

Substitution:

substitution is the replacement of a word or phrase with a "filler" word (such as one, so, or do) to avoid repetition.

There are three general ways of substituting in a sentence:

Page 18: Discourse analysis and grammar

substitution

Nominal

One /ones

Verbal

Do/so

Clausal

So / not

Page 19: Discourse analysis and grammar

In nominal substitution , the most typical substitution words are:

“one and ones” .

e.g., Let's go and see the bears. The polar ones are over on that rock.

This car is mine, but that one is yours.

Page 20: Discourse analysis and grammar

In verbal substitution, the most common substitute is the verb “do” which is sometimes used in conjunction with “so” as in “do so”.

e.g., Did Mary take that letter? She might have done.

Do/do not and auxiliaries.

She can drive the car, but I cannot.

She wrote the homework , but I did not

Page 21: Discourse analysis and grammar

In clausal substitution, an entire clause is substituted by "So, not"

E.g., I believe so.

Everyone thinks he’s guilty. If so, no doubt he’ll resign.

We should recognise him when we see him.

Yes, but supposing not: what do we do?

Page 22: Discourse analysis and grammar

Ellipsis (zero substitution) is the omission of

elements normally required by the grammar which

the speaker/writer assumes are obvious from the

context and therefore need not be raised.

E.g., Do you want to hear another song? I know

twelve more [songs]

Sue brought roses and Jackie [brought] lilies.

I ran 5 miles on the first day and 8 [miles] on the

second

Page 23: Discourse analysis and grammar

Ellipsis

nominal

verbal

clausal

Page 24: Discourse analysis and grammar

Ellipsis within the nominal group or the common noun that may be omitted and the function of head taken on by one of other elements.

E.g.,

Nelly liked the green tiles; I preferred

the blue.

Page 25: Discourse analysis and grammar

An elliptical verbal group presupposes one or more words from a previous verbal group. Technically, it is defined as a verbal group whose structure does not fully express its systematic feature. Example:

a) Have you been swimming? – Yes, I have.

b) What have you been doing? –Swimming

Page 26: Discourse analysis and grammar

A Clause in English, considered as the expression of the various speech functions, such as statement, question, response and so on, has a two-part structure consisting of modal element plus propositional element. For example:

E.g., The Duke was going to plant a row of poplars in the park.

Halliday and Hasan also say that the principle of clausal ellipsis is general to all types of questions (1976: 211).

Page 27: Discourse analysis and grammar

Conjunction acts as a cohesive tie between clauses or sections of text in such a way as to demonstrate a meaningful pattern between them.

Page 28: Discourse analysis and grammar

Conjunctions are not a way of simply joining sentences. Their role in the text is wider than that, because they provide the listener/reader with information for the interpretation of the utterance; that is why some linguists prefer to describe them as discourse markers.

Page 29: Discourse analysis and grammar

Hallday ( 1985) offers a scheme for the classification of conjunctive relations and includes over forty conjunctive items .

Here is a simplified list based on Halliday’s category headings:

Page 30: Discourse analysis and grammar
Page 31: Discourse analysis and grammar
Page 32: Discourse analysis and grammar

Activity : What type of cohesive devices have these

sentences :

She studied match hardly as a result she passed the exam.

Are you laughing? Yes, I am

Are you eating dinner? No, washing up

My reasons are as follows: One, I don’t . . ….

The government are supposed to solve the problems of the people

The blankets needed to be cleaned. Yes they did

Page 33: Discourse analysis and grammar

Halliday, M.A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan Language, context, and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (1985).

Cohesion and Coherence: Linguistic Approaches 591. Halliday M A K & IHasan R (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman. Havilland S E 86 Clark H ..

McCarthy, M. 1991. Discourse Analysis and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Page 34: Discourse analysis and grammar