disciplinary policy april 2019

21
DISCIPLINARY POLICY APRIL 2019 This policy supersedes all previous disciplinary policies

Upload: others

Post on 12-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

DISCIPLINARY POLICY APRIL 2019

This policy supersedes all previous disciplinary policies

I DISCIPLINARY POLICY_HR04_APRIL19

Policy title Disciplinary Policy

Policy reference

HR04

Policy category Human Resources

Relevant to All Staff

Date published April 2019

Implementation date

April 2019

Date last reviewed

April 2019

Next review date

March 2022

Policy lead Malwina Paulus, Head of ER and HR Business Partner

Contact details Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0203 317 7183

Accountable director

Director of HR and OD

Approved by (Group):

Joint Policy Sub Group August 2018

Approved by (Committee):

Workforce Committee September 2018

Document history

Date Version Summary of amendments

Sept 06 1 Policy revised and updated

Sept 07 2 Policy reviewed

Mar 09 3 Policy reviewed

Sep 09 4 Policy reviewed

July 10 5 Policy reviewed

Oct 11 6 Policy reviewed – reaffirmed without change

Nov 12 7 Policy reviewed

April – July 13

8

Limit FWW length and ensure misconduct examples reflect Francis Report recommendations and clarify arrangements for suspended staff and discretion of panel chairs.

January 14

9 Addition to managers checklist to consider whether a safeguarding alert should be raised

January

16 10

Policy Reviewed including introduction of commissioning manager and link to the new HR Investigation Policy and Procedures

April 2019

11 Clarification on suspension and the process of disciplinary sanctions; introduction of agreed outcome

Membership of the policy development/ review team

HR; Staffside Representatives; Trust Managers/Directors and Nursing Leads

II DISCIPLINARY POLICY_HR04_APRIL19

Consultation

Joint Policy Sub Group

Workforce Committee

DO NOT AMEND THIS DOCUMENT

Further copies of this document can be found on the Foundation Trust intranet.

III DISCIPLINARY POLICY_HR04_APRIL19

Contents Page

1 Introduction and Scope 1

2 Roles and Responsibilities 1

3 Informal Resolution 1

4 Investigation 2

5 Agreed Outcome 2

6 Suspension 3

7 Evidence from Serivce Users and Relatives 5

8 Disciplinary Hearings 5

9 Formal Disciplinary Sanctions 9

10 Professional Registration 10

11 Appeal 10

12 Right to be Accompanied 12

13 Complaints/Grievances 12

14 Right to work in the UK 13

15 Counter Fraud 13

16 Criminal Offences 14

17 Monitoring 15

18 Associated Documents 15

Appendix 1: Types of Offences that might be dealth with under the

Disciplinary Policy

16

Appendix 2: Equality Impact Assessment 17

1

1. Introduction and Scope

1.1 This procedure applies to all employees of Camden and Islington Foundation

Trust (the 'Trust') in conjunction with the HR Investigation Policy and

Procedures. This policy also supplements “Maintaining High Professional

Standards in the Modern NHS” for medical staff.

The general principles of this procedure are:

• to provide a framework within which managers can work with

employees to maintain satisfactory standards of conduct and to

encourage improvement where necessary

• to ensure disciplinary matter are dealt with fairly and that steps are

taken to establish the facts and to give employees the opportunity to

respond before taking any formal action

• to set out the standards of conduct which will be dealt with in this

Disciplinary Policy at Appendix 1.

1.2 The Trust believes that it is of mutual benefit to the Trust and its employees to

work in partnership with Staff side. This policy has been developed and agreed

by management and Staff side, in order to ensure staff are treated consistently

and fairly.

1.3 Capability and Conduct concerns which arise within the probation period will be

addressed in accordance with the Probation Policy.

1.4 Capability issues for staff beyond their probation should be addressed by

following the Trust’s Capability Policy and Procedure.

1.5 In line with the best practice under the WRES guidelines, all potential

disciplinary cases will be reviewed by the Trust WRES Lead. Additionally, a

designated Trust Execustive Directors will have an oversight of cases to

ensure fairness and review of the timeliness of cases.

2. Roles and Responsibilities

For further details please refer to the HR Investigations Policy and Procedures.

3. Informal Resolution

3.1 It is in everyone’s interests that minor conduct issues are resolved informally

through an informal conversation between the manager and an employee in

2

the first instance. If this proves to be unsuccessful, this may result in a further

conversation and an improvement note being issued.

3.2 This constitutes informal action under the Disciplinary Policy. The improvement

note will remain live on an employee’s record for a period of 6 months and it

may be taken into consideration in the event of further misconduct during this

period. After this time it will be removed and the employee notified of the fact.

Examples of minor misconduct are provided in Appendix 1. This is not an

exhaustive list.

3.2 Employees are not accompanied at an informal discussion, as issues at the

informal stage should be resolved, where possible, directly by the employee

and line manager concerned. In exceptional circumstances, the manager may

allow a trade union representative or an approved workplace colleague to

accompany the employee.

3.3 Should the improvement note not bring the required improvement or

misconduct (re)occurs, the matter may be addressed under the formal process.

There may be circumstances where it may not be appropriate to implement the

informal stage first e.g. in instances of serious/gross misconduct. Please refer

to Appendix 1.

3.4 An improvement note is recorded internally only and will not be declared on

references.

4. Investigation

4.1. The purpose of an investigation is for the Trust to establish a fair and balanced

view of the facts relating to any disciplinary allegations against an employee,

before deciding whether to proceed with a disciplinary hearing. For full details,

please see the Trust's HR Investigations Policy and Procedure.

4.2. In some circumstances of straightforward cases (e.g. timekeeping, absence

without leave – AWOL) it may be recommended that a shortened investigation

is conducted by the line manager without following a full investigation. The ER

Team will ensure that the investigation is fair and balanced before proceeding

to a hearing.

5. Agreed outcome (taking personal responsibility) If the allegation(s) are not in dispute and the employee accepts the allegations

made against them then it may be possible for the level of sanction to be

agreed, in conjunction with the commissioning manager, without the need for a

formal hearing. This is not a compulsory step for either party.

3

5.1. In some cases it may be possible to agree an outcome earlier in the process.

The commissioning manager should only consider this where the facts of the

cases are very straightforward and there is confidence that further

investigation or write up of the investigation will not alter the material facts of

the matter.

5.2. The employee will be advised in writing of the decision to proceed to a hearing

and provided with a copy of the investigation/management report where 5.1

has not been invoked. They will be advised of their right to request a sanction

(agreed outcome) prior to proceeding to a hearing.

5.3. The request for an agreed outcome can be made either by the employee or

their union representative on their behalf. The request should be made in

writing within 5 working days of the management report as noted in 5.2;

clearly outlining the sanction requested, any mitigating factors, the length of

time the sanction will remain valid for and the employee’s case for the specific

sanction.

5.4. The commissioning manager following discussion with with ER team can

either agree to the proposed sanction or if the commissioning manager does

not feel they have sufficient information to make a decision or disagree with

the suggested level of sanction/length of sanction, then the normal formal

disciplinary process should follow. The commissioning manager will confirm

their decision on the proposal in writing within 5 working days.

5.5. It is not appropriate to use agreed outcomes in cases where dismissal is a

potential outcome.

6. Suspension

6.1. In some circumstances, the Trust may need to take a decision to suspend an

employee from work or relocate their place of work. Suspension/redeployment

of this kind is not a disciplinary penalty and does not imply that any decision

has already been made about the allegations. It is an action intended to be

neutral, enabling an individual to be released from their place of work while

receiving full pay in the circumstances set out in 6.3. Subject to paragraph 6.8

below, full pay includes all enhancements that would have been earned if the

employee had been working normally.

6.2. Full pay may not apply when the employee has failed to maintain their

professional registration which prevents them from fulfilling their current role,

and in circumstances when an employee cannot evidence their right to work

in the UK. In these circumstances employees would receive no pay. The

4

suspending manager must notifiy payroll. It should be ensured that staff on

enhancements redeployed to non enhanced role, continue to have their

enhancements paid.

6.3. Staff may be suspended in the following circumstances (which are not limited

to the list below):

• a need to protect service users, employees or the business interests of

the trust pending a full investigation of allegations of gross misconduct

• the presence of the employee is likely to hinder an investigation

• there is a genuine belief that the employee may interfere with evidence

or witnesses

• there is no workable alternative to suspension.

6.4. The Trust recognises that suspension may be stressful therefore staff will be

offered support from either their line, commissioning and/or commissioning

manager. This may take form of an Occupational Health and/or Employee

Assistance Programme referral.

6.5. The suspension will be for no longer than necessary to investigate any

allegations of misconduct or so long as is otherwise reasonable while any

disciplinary procedure is outstanding. The arrangements will be confirmed to

the employee in writing along with the reasons for suspension and their point

of contact who will not normally be a commissioning manager.

6.6. Senior Managers (band 8a and above) have the authority to suspend,

however they should seek advice from the Employee Relations Team and

Senior Management prior to this. In some circumstances it may not be

possible to obtain HR advice or have a senior manager on duty and therefore

they may take a decision on whether to suspend, for example, at night or over

weekends. In these circumstances, it may be acceptable to ask an employee

to leave work on special paid leave and arrange to meet to clarify how the

matter will be dealt with at the earliest possible opportunity.

6.7. The period of suspension should be kept under review every 3 to 4 weeks and

redeployment options will be considered where appropriate. Any suspension

should initially last no longer than 3 to 4 weeks. If it is necessary to extend the

suspension period the employee will be informed in writing and regular contact

will be maintained. In subsequent review there will be contact with the

employee either face to face or by telephone.

6.8. While suspended, the employee should not return to their workplace or visit

any of the Trust's sites or make contact with any service users or staff without

5

the express permission of the suspending / investigating manager. This does

not apply to needing to obtain urgent medical attention for themselves or their

immediate family. In the event that they are not able to comply with this

requirement, they must inform the suspending/investigating manager at the

earliest opportunity. If the employee needs to attend a Trust site in order to

consult with their accredited Trade Union representative or to access any

relevant information, they should notify the suspending/investigating manager

in writing prior to their visit. Failure to notify the suspending/investigating

manager of this will be regarded as a serious breach of the suspension and

the Trust may take further formal action under the Disciplinary Policy, as

appropriate.

6.9. Staff who are suspended from duty are not permitted to undertake NHS

Professionals shifts at a Trust site. If they work bank or agency shifts

elsewhere or plan to, this must also be raised immediately with the

suspending/investigating manager to gain consent prior to any further shifts

being undertaken during the suspension period. During the hours where they

would normally be working for the Trust no bank or ageny shifts should be

undertaken.

6.10. It is a condition of paid suspension that staff make themselves available to

attend meetings and comply with reasonable management instructions.

7. Evidence from Service Users and their Relatives

7.1. It is the Trust’s policy not to call service users and their relatives to disciplinary

hearings as witnesses to give evidence. If information is needed from a

service user or their relative, the investigating manager will ensure that this is

obtained by meeting with the service user or their relative. The employee

under investigation has a right to submit any questions that they would like

asked of the service user and/or their relatives.

7.2. For further information, please refer to the HR Investigations Policy and

Procedure.

8. Disciplinary Hearing

8.1. Notification of a Hearing

8.1.1. Following an investigation, if the Trust considers there are grounds for

disciplinary action, the employee will be required to attend a disciplinary

hearing. The Trust will inform them in writing of the alleged misconduct

6

and its possible consequences to enable them to prepare. The

employee will be given copies of relevant documents and witness

statements in advance of the hearing. The employee will have the right

to be accompanied as set out in paragraph 12.

8.1.2. The Trust will provide the employee with at least five working days’

notice of the date, time and place of the disciplinary hearing. It will be

held in an appropriate location.

8.2. Timescales

8.2.1. A disciplinary hearing will normally be convened within 4 weeks of the

conclusion of the investigation.

8.2.2. The Trust will confirm in writing the outcome of the disciplinary hearing

normally within 10 calendar days. However, the employee will be

notified of any reasonable delay.

8.3. Failure to Attend

8.3.1. The employee must make every effort to attend the disciplinary hearing,

whether as the employee under investigation or as a witness. Failure to

attend without good reason may be treated as misconduct in itself. If

the employee under investigation fails to attend without good reason, or

is persistently unable to do so and/or does not nominate a

representative to attend in their absence the Trust may have to take a

decision based on the available evidence and proceed in their absence.

8.3.2. Appropriate weight shall be given to the evidence of any witness that

fails to attend the hearing and their reasons for non-attendance will be

taken into account, if known.

8.3.3. If the employee under investigation is off work due to sickness absence,

Occupational Health may be asked to assess the employee’s fitness to

attend meetings and/or a disciplinary hearing and if any reasonable

adjustments are required.

8.4. Witness Timescales

8.4.1. The investigating manager is responsible for arranging the attendance

of their witnesses and ensuring they are given a copy of their witness

statement/s to refer to during the hearing. All staff are expected to

cooperate with these procedures.

7

8.4.2. If the employee under investigation and their representative wish to call

witnesses at the disciplinary hearing, they will be responsible for

arranging their attendance. However, if suspended, the employee

should inform the chair as early as possible if there are any relevant

witnesses who should attend the hearing.

8.4.3. The chair of the panel may ask the employee to clarify the relevance of

the witnesses to the allegations. Where an employee requests the

attendance of witnesses during the hearing that have not been

previously notified in accordance with the above procedures the panel

will decide whether an adjournment is appropriate to enable them to

attend. The final decision will be made by the chair of the panel.

8.4.4. Staff attending as witnesses will be given reasonable paid time off to

attend. The investigating manager may agree to reimburse their

witnesses for appropriate travelling/other expenses.

8.4.5. Staff who are called as witnesses to a hearing will not have the right to

be accompanied, however may request this in extenuating

circumstances. The panel chair will make the decision to accept or

decline the request. Permission will not be unreasonably withheld.

8.4.6. Where possible witnesses for the respective parties will wait in separate

waiting rooms,and must not be present at the hearing or appeal except

for the purpose of giving evidence.

8.5. Role and Membership of the Disciplinary Hearing Panel

8.5.1. The hearing panel will consist of a chairperson, who will be assisted by

a member of HR staff. Where possible the chairperson should be from

the relevant professional field and of an appropriate seniority to chair

the hearing.

8.5.2. Advisors to the panel may be appointed, for example, if the Chair is from

a non-nursing background and the matters being examined may require

specialist nursing advice.

8.5.3. The Chair and their advisors will all equally be able to participate in

proceedings; however, the responsibility for making the final decision

will rest with the Chair. It is therefore important that consideration is

given in advance as to the suitability of the Chair and that the Chair

8

carefully considers all the circumstances and advice before reaching a

decision.

8.5.4. The Chair has absolute discretion on the conduct of the hearing and

may at any stage decide to adjourn/amend proceedings to ensure

fairness and obtain clarity on any points.

8.6. Employee resigning prior to completion of Investigation or Hearing Potential

Disciplinary Hearing Outcomes

8.6.1. When an employee who is the subject of an investigation resigns prior

to a disciplinary hearing or prior to the completion of the investigation,

the Trust may take a decision based on the available evidence. In these

circumstances the Trust will usually complete the investigation and a

management meeting will be held to consider whether any further

action is required (e.g. notifying the appropriate professional body in

cases of professional misconduct or notification to Independent

Safeguarding Authority).

8.6.2. If a reference is subsequently requested by an employee who has

resigned under these circumstances, the reference must state that the

employee was the subject of a disciplinary investigation, and that the

employee chose to resign before the investigation was completed or

before the disciplinary hearing could take place. However, the nature of

the investigation may not be disclosed to protect confidentiality and

maintain the integrity of the overall investigation.

8.6.3. Where a disciplinary sanction has been issued and the employee has

subsequently resigned, any response to a request for a reference will

include details of the disciplinary sanction imposed. Again this must be

done with due regard to both confidentiality and maintaining the integrity

of the overall investigation.

8.7. Potential Hearing Outcomes

8.7.1. The Chair will ensure that reasonable steps have been taken to

establish the circumstances of the matter as fully as possible and that

the procedure followed is fair. The Chair will fully consider all the

information presented to them by both staff side and management side

and relevant advice from the panel advisor/s in deciding whether to

uphold the allegation/s.

8.7.2. There may be circumstances where following an investigation and/or

disciplinary hearing, the staff member may be issued only with an

9

informal sanction such as an improvement note or training/development

recommendations.

9. Formal Disciplinary Sanctions

Formal disciplinary sanctions are usually applied following an appropriately convened

disciplinary hearing unless an outcome is agreed with an employee as per section 5 of

this policy.

9.1. First Written Warning

If the conduct is sufficiently serious or if there has been no improvement

following an informal action, it may be appropriate to issue a first written

warning, which will normally remain active for one year. There may be

circumstances where it is appropriate to issue this warning for a longer perior

(not exceeding 18 months).

9.2. Final Written Warning

If the conduct is sufficiently serious or if there has been no improvement

following the issuing of a first written warning (which is still active), it may be

appropriate to issue a final written warning. Final written warnings will normally

remain active for a period of one year. There may be circumstances where it is

appropriate to issue this warning for a longer period (not exceeding 18

months).

9.3. Dismissal

If the conduct is sufficiently serious or if there has been no improvement

following final written warning having been issued (which is still active), it may

be appropriate to dismiss the employee. In cases of gross misconduct, the

Trust reserves the right to summarily dismiss the employee. This means that

the employee is dismissed with immediate effect with no paid notice period.

9.4. Spent, inactive warnings shall be disregarded for disciplinary purposes and

removed from an employee’s formal record upon their expiry and the

employee notified that this has happened.

9.5. Staff under Agenda for Change terms and conditions who have issued with a

formal sanction may have their incremental progression delayed.

9.6. Additional Action

The Chair may decide on additional action which may include but is not limited

to the following:

• Redeployment of the employee to an alternative role/work base (no pay

protection will apply)

10

• Appropriate training/re-training and development with a specific action plan

• Some other intervention, for example, to improve working practice or the

working environment

• Withholding of pay where there has been a period of unauthorised absence

• Compliance with the Trust's legal duty to refer employees to the Disclosure

and Barring Service ('DBS') where an allegation of misconduct is upheld

against a member of staff who has:

o Harmed or poses a risk of harm to a child or vulnerable adult;

o Satisfied the harm test; or

o Received a caution or conviction for a relevant offence.

10. Professional Registration

10.1. Where disciplinary action has been taken against a professionally registered

member of staff, consideration should be given to making a referral to the

relevant professional body. In such cases HR will notify the relevant

professional head who will then be responsible for authorising the referral to

the professional body.

10.2. If a decision is taken to make a referral, this will be confirmed to the member of

staff in writing in advance.

11. Appeal

If an employee wishes to appeal against a disciplinary decision, they must inform HR

in writing, within 10 working days of the date of the disciplinary outcome letter, stating

their full grounds of appeal. As guidance, they may appeal against the decision on the

grounds that:

They believe that the decision was wrong based on the evidence

provided

They believe that procedures followed were unfair

They feel that the outcome/sanction was too harsh and/or inconsistent

New evidence has come to light that was not available at the original

hearing

11.1. Appeal Hearings

11.1.1. The appeal hearing panel shall consist of an Appeal Chair, who will

usually be more senior than the chairperson of the disciplinary hearing,

against whose decision the employee is appealing. The Appeal Chair

must be at least at Band 8 level or equivalent. The Appeal Chair should

not have been involved in the preceding stages of the procedure. The

Appeal Chair will be assisted by the HR Business Partner or Deputy

11

Director of HR and OD (or their nominated representative). The

appellant may bring a colleague or trade union representative with them

to the appeal hearing.

11.1.2. If appropriate, one member of the panel should have knowledge of the

field of work. The panel may request the services of a specialist advisor

to advise the appeal panel.

11.1.3. The Appeal Chair will ensure that reasonable steps have been taken to

establish the circumstances of the matter as fully as possible and that

the procedure followed is fair. The Appeal Chair will fully consider all

the information presented to them by both staff side and management

side and relevant advice from the panel members and advisor/s in

deciding whether to uphold the allegation/s and sanctions imposed at

the disciplinary hearing.

11.1.4. Each panel member will equally be able to participate in proceedings;

however, the responsibility for making the final decision will rest with the

Appeal Chair. It is therefore important that consideration is given in

advance as to the suitability of the Appeal Chair and that the Appeal

Chair carefully considers all the circumstances and advice before

reaching a decision.

11.2. Appeal Hearing Outcomes

The Appeal Chair may decide:

that the allegation/s cannot be upheld and the sanctions imposed at

the disciplinary hearing should be overturned

to uphold the allegation(s), in which case, the panel will consider the

disciplinary sanction(s) previously imposed with regard to all the

circumstances

uphold the previous sanction/s or reduce the level of sanction

to make additional recommendations such as redeployment,

training, etc.

The Trust will inform the employee in writing of the final decision, as soon as possible,

usually within a week from the appeal hearing. The Chair's appeal decision will be final

and there will be no further right of appeal.

12

12. Right to be Accompanied

12.1. At all formal stages of this procedure and formal hearings, the employee has

the right to be accompanied by an accredited Trade Union Representative or

a workplace colleague, ('Companion'). It is the employee’s responsibility to

arrange and secure the attendance of their Companion at any hearing. The

employee may not be accompanied by any other person or a legal

representative.

12.2. The Companion does not have the right to answer questions on employee’s

behalf and address the hearing or prevent the Trust from explaining its case.

Any companion who has been requested to accompany the employee will be

given a reasonable amount of paid time off from duties, if they are a workplace

colleague.

12.3. If a hearing is arranged but the employee’s Companion/representative is not

available, the employee must provide the investigation manager full details of

alternative dates within 5 days of the original hearing date . If the employee

fails to do so, the Trust may schedule the hearing on another date at its

discretion. Alternatively, if the Companion is unavailable at the time a meeting

is scheduled and will not be available for more than 5 days afterwards, the

Trust may ask the employee to choose someone else.

13. Complaints/Grievances

13.1. During the application of this procedure, if a complaint (e.g. grievance) is

raised that relates to the employee’s conduct issues or their management, the

Trust will consider how best to proceed. The Trust recognises the merit of

resolving all issues as quickly as possible and will therefore normally attempt

to deal with both matters at the same time under this procedure and, if

necessary, consider appointing an alternative, neutral manager. The Trust

may also consider suspending the disciplinary procedure for a short time

whilst the complaint is appropriately dealt with in certain circumstances only.

If complaints made are unrelated to the disciplinary matter then these will be

addressed separately under the appropriate policy (e.g. Grievance or Bullying

and Discrimination).

13.2. In the event that the Disciplinary Panel is asked to consider the employee’s

complaint during the disciplinary hearing it shall be for the Panel Chair in

liaison with HR to determine the appropriate order of presentation taking into

account the individual detail of the case.

13

14. Right to work in the UK

14.1. It is unlawful to employ someone who does not have the appropriate right to

work in the UK or who is working in breach of their conditions of stay.

14.2. As stated in the terms and conditions of employment, employees must hold a

valid right to work in the UK and must be able to evidence this. The Trust will

carry out appropriate employment checks at the start of the employee’s

employment and thereafter where appropriate, to ensure that they have and

continue to have the right to undertake paid employment as set out in the

Trust’s Recruitment and Selection Policy. it is a condition of employment that

employees are entitled to work in the United Kingdom ('UK') and will notify the

Trust immediately of any changes that may affect this right.

14.3. Where the Trust has a reasonable belief or reason that the employee may not

have the right to work in the UK, the employee will be suspended without pay

until confirmation of their right to work is received from them, the Home Office

and/or is determined at a formal hearing.

14.4. The Trust may invite the person to attend a formal hearing under this

Disciplinary Procedure and the person will be asked to provide proof of your

right to work in the UK.

14.5. The Trust reserves the right to immediately notify the Home Office and carry

out any checks relevant to ensure that it complies with its duties to prevent

illegal working in the UK. For example, this may involve submitting an

'Employer Checking Service' request to the Home Office to check the

individual’s right to work in the UK.

15. Counter Fraud

15.1. Managers and employees should ensure that they are familiar with the

requirements set out in the Trust’s Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy

and Response Plan, any concerns or allegations relating to fraud or bribery

should be reported to the Local Counter Fraud Specialist and HR

department. Where a manager or employee has reason to suspect that a

fraud or bribery may have taken place they must not take further action

unless advised otherwise, as any subsequent investigation undertaken by a

counter fraud officer may be compromised by inappropriate action at this

stage. On no account should the employee be spoken to or interviewed until

advised to do so by Local Counter Fraud.

14

15.2. Interviews conducted by Counter Fraud may be under caution and in these

situations the individual is entitled to independent legal advice.

15.3. The LCFS and Director of Finance, will review the evidence

obtained/available during the investigation and the seriousness of the

offence(s) alongside NHS Protects Area Anti Fraud Specialist who will

technically assess the case file to decide whether it is suitable for

submission to the Crown Prosecution Service for a decision on whether a

prosecution should take place.

15.4. The Trusts LCFS, Karenjeet Basra can be contacted on 07468367201 or via

email on [email protected] should you have any queries or

concerns. All queries are treated in the strictest confidence.

15.5. Alternatively please report any suspicions via the NHS Fraud and Corruption

Reporting Line on 0800 028 4060 or via www.reportnhsfraud.nhs.uk

16. Criminal Offences

16.1. Where the misconduct is the subject of a police investigation or legal

process, the Trust has the discretion to proceed with its own investigation

and disciplinary action in accordance with this procedure, without the

outcome of any police investigation or prosecution. The Trust may decide to

conduct relevant internal proceedings, pending police/legal proceedings at

its discretion.

16.2. Where an employee is questioned under caution, and/or arrested; and/or

cautioned; and/or convicted of a criminal offence; and/or issued with a

reprimand letter for an offence committed outside of work, it is the

employee’s responsibility to inform their line manager of the circumstances.

Failure to report or disclose this information will result in disciplinary action

being taken up to and including dismissal. A risk assessment will be

completed to inform the impact on an individual’s employment.

16.3. Where an employee is charged with or convicted of a criminal offence not

related to work this is not in itself reason for disciplinary action. The facts of

the case will be established and consideration given to whether the matter is

serious enough to warrant starting the disciplinary procedure.

Consideration will be given to what effect the charge or conviction has on the

employee’s suitability to do their type of work and their relationship with their

employer, work colleagues and service users. Consideration will also be

15

given as to whether an incident which is or has become public knowledge,

might, as a result, bring the trust into disrepute.

17. Monitoring

Elements to be monitored

Lead How trust will monitor compliance

Frequency Reporting arrangements Which committee or group will the monitoring report go to?

Acting on recommendations and Lead(s) Which committee or group will act on recommendations?

Change in practice and lessons to be shared How will changes be implemented and lessons learnt/ shared?

Investigation Outcomes

HR Audit Quarterly Workforce Committee/Equality and Diversity Committee

Required actions will be identified and completed in a specified timeframe

Required changes to practice will be identified and actioned within a specific time frame. A lead member of the team will be identified to take each change forward where appropriate. Lessons will be shared with all the relevant stakeholders

18. Associated Documents

Grievance Policy

HR Investigations Procedure

Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy

16

Appendix 1 – Types of Offences that may be dealt with under the Disciplinary Policy 1) Timekeeping 2) Health and Safety 3) Abuse of Facilities 4) Contravention of codes of conduct/other rules, including the NHS Constitution

and Values and the Trust’s Values 5) Other misconduct 6) Gross Misconduct e.g. - theft; fraud; deliberate falsification of records; fighting; assault or abuse of

another person; failure to fully report serious injury/death of a patient and all related circumstances or to obstruct others in complying with their duty to fully report such matters; deliberate damage to/serious abuse of Trust property/facilities; serious incapability through alcohol or being under the influence of illegal drugs; sleeping whilst on duty; serious negligence which causes or has the potential to cause unacceptable loss, damage or injury; serious act of insubordination; extended unauthorised absence; unauthorised entry to computer records; unauthorised access and use of confidential/sensitive data; discrimination; harassment; victimisation, including against staff who raise genuine concerns e.g. about malpractice; bullying; threatening/intimidating/violent behaviour; inappropriate relationships with patients/service users

Note: This list contains only some examples and is by no means exhaustive.

17

Appendix 2

Equality Impact Assessment Tool

Yes/No Comments

1. Does the policy/guidance affect one group less or more favourably than another on the basis of:

Race No

Ethnic origins (including gypsies and travellers) No

Nationality No

Gender No

Culture No

Religion or belief No

Sexual orientation including lesbian, gay and bisexual people

No

Age No

Disability - learning disabilities, physical disability, sensory impairment and mental health problems

No

2. Is there any evidence that some groups are affected differently?

No

3. If you have identified potential discrimination, are any exceptions valid, legal and/or justifiable?

N/A

4. Is the impact of the policy/guidance likely to be negative?

No

5. If so can the impact be avoided? N/A

6. What alternatives are there to achieving the policy/guidance without the impact?

N/A

7. Can we reduce the impact by taking different action?

N/A