diis ∙ danish institute for international studies ontological security - the ‘on- off’ button...
TRANSCRIPT
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Ontological Security - the ‘on-off’ button of spill-over?Trine Flockhart
Singapore, 4 October 2011
What is the paper about?
A sympathetic revision of Ernst Haas’s neo-functionalism
Elevating spill-over from a first order theorizing concept to second order theorizing
Introduces ontological security as a precondition for agent action
Sees spill-over as a result of enthusiasm and a ‘can do’ attitude rather than a result of disappointment and frustration
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Outline of paper
Neo-functionalism – the basics Haas’s ‘theory of international politics’ and change at
the macro level Ontological security Identity and the importance of self-esteem Narrative and the importance of biographical
continuity Practice and Action Action outcomes and conditions for spill-over
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Neo-functionalism – the basics
Neo-functionalism – the first integration theory based on the empirical situation unfolding in (Western) Europe during the 1950s
Central concept spill-over, which holds that a dynamic and expansive logic of integration into different policy-areas and at higher levels of authority.
Seemed able to explain European regional integration in the 1950s and early 60s but fell into disrepute after De Gaulle’s veto
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Haas’s ‘theory of international politics’
Ernst Haas was a prolific writer on nationalism, epistemic communities and social constructivism
The ‘other guy down the corridor’ Haas was always really concerned
with ‘change at the macro level’ and how to affect change
Change following crisis or disruptive events and change in the absence of crisis
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Problems with Neo-functionalism
Euro-specific both in its empirical focus and in its theoretical assumptions and conditions
Extremely specific as it was conceptualized as a first order theory
Central concepts and processes were under specified
Formulated within the wrong ‘zeitgeist’ Unable to incorporate external events
and structural change
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Ontological security 1
The security of the self Anthony Giddens, Jenifer Mitzen ‘When an agent has a stable and as
possitive as possible view of self and where order and stability in regard to the future, relationships and experiences is maintained’
Individuals need to feel secure in who they are (self-esteem), experience themselves as a whole and continuous person and maintain uncertainty within tolerable limits
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Ontological Security 2
Ontological security is what allows agents to get on with daily life
It requires that agents have ‘basic trust’ and manageable levels of anxiety
It assumes a stable cognitive environment through routinization of daily practices
It requires reinforcement through successful action leading to pride rather than unsuccessful/failed action leading to shame/disappointment
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Identity and the importance of self-esteem
SIT assumes that agents strive to maximize their self-esteem and that a high level of self-esteem will prevent anxiety.
High self-esteem will ensure a positive narrative, which will produce integrity of the self.
SIT also assumes that agents need cognitive consistency, which is achieved through stable social relations through belonging to a social group with a given norm set
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Narrative and the importance of biographical continuity
Narrative theory assumes that the aim of the narrative construction process is positive emplotment and sense making of the past
Narratives continuously incorporate occurring events and new episodes into a positive story about ‘who we are’
It is assumed that agents will always try to establish a ‘strong narrative’ that ensure biographical continuity and self-esteem.
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
The narrative-identity shuttle
There is a constant process of ‘shuttling’ to and fro between narrative construction processes and identity construction processes.
Time and energy consuming process Always in constitution and influenced
from both the structural/external level and from the agent level
Equilibrium between narrative and identity = ontological security
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Practice and Action
Practice is seen as unconscious or automatic activities embedded in taken for granted routines contributing to stability
Action is reflexive intentional goal oriented behavior designed to affect change
Rhetorical action is located at the language level consisting mainly of statements that do not require any further action
Functional action requires actual action All action and practice can be reinforcing or
undermining
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Towards a modernized version of spill-over
Applies to all intentional action processes designed to affect change
The overall process may be ‘kick-started’ by crisis, but is more likely to take place in the absence of crisis.
‘agent-led action related to a specific goal leading to further action in a dynamic, and possibly expansive, process where the initial agent-led action leads to more action, and all major actors remain committed to the project’
Results from positive emotionsDIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Conditions for spill-over Action (either rhetorical but preferably
functional) must be reinforcing Events must be able to be incorporated
into the narrative and identity construction processes without detrimental effects on bio-graphical continuity or self-esteem
Practice must be continuously reinforcing Disruptive structural change is absent Ontological security has to be
established at all times
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
NATO and EU (CSDP)
Two organizations within the same structural environment and similar roles
Yet since the end of CW dramatically different action patterns and different ontological security patterns
Both have displayed clear processes of spill-over
Both suggest that spill-over is fragile and difficult to establish and sustain
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Conclusion Incorporate the structural/external
level and agent level – both of which feed into a process level
If all five conditions are present, spill-over may be ‘switched on’.
Elevating spill-over to a general issue of change
Allows for comparison between different processes of change
Change is always possible, but difficult to achieve and to sustain
DIIS ∙ DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES