diffraction – going further - cime | epfl · • for an fcc lattice which of the zone axes [1 0...

19
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL Diffraction – Going further 1 Duncan Alexander EPFL-CIME Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL Contents Higher order Laue zones (HOLZ) Convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED) HOLZ lines in CBED Thickness measurements Polarity measurements Kikuchi diffractionNanobeam diffraction mapping 2

Upload: ngodien

Post on 02-Aug-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Diffraction –Going further

1

Duncan AlexanderEPFL-CIME

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Contents

• Higher order Laue zones (HOLZ)

• Convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED)

• HOLZ lines in CBED

• Thickness measurements

• Polarity measurements

• Kikuchi diffractionNanobeam diffraction mapping

2

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Higher order Laue zones (HOLZ)

3

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL 4

Higher-order Laue Zones

ZOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 0FOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 1SOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 2

... Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL 5

Higher-order Laue Zones

Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL 6

Higher-order Laue zone quiz

• ZOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 0;!FOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 1;!SOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 2;!….

• For an FCC lattice which of the zone axes [1 0 0], [1 1 0] and![1 1 1] will show a FOLZ?

• FCC planes with h, k, l mixed even and odd are absent

• [1 0 0]: FOLZ equation gives h = 1; possible with h k l all odd so see FOLZ

• [1 1 0]: h + k = 1; impossible for h k l all even or all odd so no FOLZ

• [1 1 1]: h + k + l= 1; possible with h k l all odd so see FOLZ

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

HOLZ for higher symmetry• HOLZ reflections introduce a third dimension of reciprocal lattice

into SADP (diffraction from planes inclined to e-beam)

• These HOLZ reflections can show higher order symmetry not present in the ZOLZ – example FCC Al on [1 1 1] zone axis. FOLZ shows 3-fold symmetry (look carefully!)

ZOLZ only ZOLZ and FOLZ

7

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Convergent beam electron diffraction

8

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Instead of parallel illumination with selected-area aperture, CBED uses!highly converged illumination to select a much smaller specimen region

Convergent beam electron diffraction

Small illuminated area => !no thickness and orientation variations

There is dynamical scattering, but it is useful!

Can obtain disc and line patterns!“packed” with information:

9

Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Convergent beam electron diffraction

10

Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Convergent beam electron diffraction

11

Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Convergent beam electron diffraction

12

Figures from Williams & Carter “Transmission Electron Microscopy”

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Convergent beam electron diffraction

13

Image plane:!see image of focused

e-beam

Back-focal plane

Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Convergent beam electron diffraction

Exact 2-beam condition

Near 2-beam condition

14

Image plane:!see image of focused

e-beam

Back-focal plane

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Excess and Deficient lines

15

0 0 0

kIkDkk

• Look at Ewald sphere construction – here Ewald sphere intersects a HOLZ reflection exactly.In this condition this HOLZ reflection must give 2!B scattering angle.

• If we draw in rays for excess and deficient lines at +!B and –!B relative to the planes making thereflection we see excess line intersects HOLZ reflection and deficient 0 0 0 exactly.

• If we plot full angular range of incident beam it is clear that deficient HOLZ line crosses 0 0 0 disc.

0 0 0

kIkDkk

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Excess and Deficient lines

16

• Look at Ewald sphere construction – here Ewald sphere intersects a HOLZ reflection exactly.In this condition this HOLZ reflection must give 2!B scattering angle.

• If we draw in rays for excess and deficient lines at +!B and –!B relative to the planes making thereflection we see excess line intersects HOLZ reflection and deficient 0 0 0 exactly.

• If we plot full angular range of incident beam it is clear that deficient HOLZ line crosses 0 0 0 disc.

0 0 0

kIkDkk

0 0 0

kIkDkk

0 0 0

kIkDkk

0 0 0

kIkDkk

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

HOLZ lines in CBED

• If HOLZ CBED discs at have excess lines at Bragg condition these give corresponding deficient lines crossing 0 0 0 disc

17

Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL 18

HOLZ lines in CBEDBecause HOLZ lines contain 3D information, they also show true symmetry!

e.g. three-fold {111} symmetry for cubic Al- unlike apparent six-fold axis in SADP or from ZOLZ Kikuchi lines

JEMS simulation for 300 nm thick Al, 200 keV beam energy

Deficient lines for inclined planes: Fringes from 2D

interactions/dynamical scattering; more

thickness gives more fringes

-3 -7 115 7 -117 5 -11

hU + kV + lW =?

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Thickness measurement by CBED• Within CBED discs also obtain patterns from dynamical scattering. These patterns show fringes that

are somewhat analogous to thickness fringes in the TEM image.

• Can measure thickness e.g. by comparing experimental data to simulation

• Example: Blochwave simulations for Al on [0 0 1] zone axis:

19

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

• Easier to think about in 2-beam Bragg scattering condition

• Different rays in the scattered beam sample different excitation errors for the reflection g

• Effectively we make a map of intensity for different excitation errors s along a chord in the disc g

• As thickness increases nodes in sinc2 function move to smaller s (reciprocal relationship with thickness) => more fringes in the disc

20

t = 10 nm t = 25 nm t = 50 nm

Intensity vs s for 2-beam condition, different specimen thicknesses t

Thickness measurement by CBED

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL 21

• Therefore to obtain CBED discs with 1-D fringes for thickness measurement tilt to 2-beam condition

• Possible to calculate thickness analytically (e.g. see Williams & Carter)

• Example: Blochwave simulations for Al with (0 0 2) reflection excited:

Thickness measurement by CBED

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Identifying polarity in CBED

22

Patterns from dynamical scattering in direct and diffraction discs allow determination of polarity of non-centrosymmetric crystals because dynamical scattering patterns are sensitive to

channeling down particular atomic column

T. Mitate et al. Phys. Stat. Sol. (a)!192, 383 (2002)

Simulation vs experiment:JEMS simulation: GaN [1 -1 0 0] zone axis

t = 100 nm

t = 150 nm

t = 200 nm

t = 250 nm

000-2 0000 0002

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Zone axis CBED• Instead of spot pattern, obtain disc pattern

• Larger convergence semi-angle α => larger discs

Parallel beam SADP Si [001] α = 1.6 mrad α = 3.9 mrad

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Zone axis CBED• Instead of spot pattern, obtain disc pattern

• Larger convergence semi-angle α => larger discs

α = 8.6 mradα = 3.9 mrad α = 19.3 mrad

See fringes in discs, and symmetry

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Convergent beam electron diffraction – practical example

ZnO thin-film sample;Conditions: convergent beam, large condenser aperture, diffraction mode

25

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Convergent beam electron diffraction – practical example

ZnO thin-film sample;Conditions: convergent beam, large condenser aperture, diffraction mode

[1 1 0] zone axis

26

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Kikuchi diffraction

27

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Kikuchi lines

• Formation of bright and dark lines (“excess” and “deficient” lines) by combination of inelastic scattering followed by elastic scattering in parallel incident beam geometry (e.g. SADP)

• Inelastic scattering is incoherent (no preferential scattering vectors) but is generally in forwards direction

• Cones of inelastically-scattered electrons then elastically scattered, creating arcs in the diffraction plane. Because angles are small the arcs look straight.

• Resultant lines are very similar to the excess and deficient lines of CBED. They are equally sensitive to specimen orientation, and we use them e.g. to set a 2-beam condition. However the specimen must be thick (for sufficient inelastic scattering) and flat (to have sharp lines) to see them well.

2828

• Treat problem in “real space”

• Treat 2-beam Bragg scattering condition

• Yellow volume represents intensity distribution of inelastic scattering event; mainly forward scattered

• origin of inelastic scattering event:

"

h k lh k l– ––

"

"

"""""""""""

"""

h k l– – –h k l

2

Kikuchi line formation

29

h k l– – –h k l

" "

ghkl0 0 0

kI

kD

• Treat problem in reciprocal space; Ewald sphere construction

• Forward scattering from incoherent inelastic scattering gives diffuse intensity at low scattering angles around 0 0 0

• Exact Bragg condition: Kikuchi lines coincide with Bragg spots

Deficient line: forward-scattered inelastic intensity removed from Kikuchi line ! dark line on brighter background

Excess line: forward-scattered inelastic intensity redistributed into Kikuchi line ! bright line on low background

Kikuchi line formation

30

• Treat problem in “real space”

• Treat zone axis condition

Kikuchi line formation

h k lh k l– ––

""""

" ""

h k l– ––h k l31

• Treat problem in reciprocal space; Ewald sphere construction

• Remember Bragg spots only visible because of relrods and excitation error s

• Zone axis condition: (by geometry) Kikuchi lines halfway between Bragg spots

Symmetrical relationship so both Kikuchi lines should have same intensity

Kikuchi line formation

h k l h k l– ––

ghkl0 0 0–ghkls

kI

kD

32

2

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Kikuchi diffraction

33

Position of the Kikuchi line pairs of (excess and deficient) very sensitive to specimen orientationCan use to identify excitation vector; in particular s = 0 when diffracted beam coincides!

exactly with excess Kikuchi line (and direct beam with deficient Kikuchi line)

33

Quiz: what happens to width of Kikuchi line pairs as (h k l) indices become bigger? !Answer: larger indices (h k l) ! greater scattering angle "B ! larger width of line pairs

Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Kikuchi lines – “road map” to reciprocal space

34

Kikuchi lines traverse reciprocal space, converging on zone axes

- use them to navigate reciprocal space as you tilt the specimen!

Examples: Si simulations using JEMS

Si [1 1 0] Si [1 1 0] tilted off zone axis Si [2 2 3]

Obviously Kikuchi lines can be useful, but can be hard to see (e.g. from insufficient thickness, diffuse lines from crystal bending, strain). Need an alternative method...

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Mapping in nano-beam diffraction mode

35

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Nano-beam set-up• In nano-beam mode, use small C2 condenser aperture and excited 3rd condenser

lens (e.g. condenser mini-lens) to make near-parallel beam of 2–3 nm diameter on specimen surface

• Typical convergence semi-angle alpha ~0.5–1 mrad; therefore obtain spot-like diffraction patterns from very small probe

36

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

Orientation image mapping in TEM• The NanoMEGAS ASTAR system scans the nano-

beam across sample while recording diffraction patterns to make a map with one diffraction pattern for every pixel positions x, y

• “Template” matching then used to identify phase and orientation; each pattern correlated with 100s-1000s of patterns simulated at different orientations and for different phases

• Much higher spatial resolution than EBSD in SEM, and angular resolution of 1°

• Can combine with precession for greater reliability of indexing

37

[1] E.F. Rauch et al., Micros. Anal. Nanotech. Supplement, 22(6), S5-S8 ,2008

Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL

ASTAR example: nanocrystalline ZnO• Plan-view sample of textured, nanocrystalline ZnO thin-film

• 750 x 750 pixel map, 2–3 nm probe size, 2 nm step size

38

A. Brian Aebersold, CIME{0001}

{10-10}

{2-1-10}Z X

Y