diffraction – going further - cime | epfl · • for an fcc lattice which of the zone axes [1 0...
TRANSCRIPT
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Diffraction –Going further
1
Duncan AlexanderEPFL-CIME
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Contents
• Higher order Laue zones (HOLZ)
• Convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED)
• HOLZ lines in CBED
• Thickness measurements
• Polarity measurements
• Kikuchi diffractionNanobeam diffraction mapping
2
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Higher order Laue zones (HOLZ)
3
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL 4
Higher-order Laue Zones
ZOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 0FOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 1SOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 2
... Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL 5
Higher-order Laue Zones
Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL 6
Higher-order Laue zone quiz
• ZOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 0;!FOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 1;!SOLZ: hU + kV + lW = 2;!….
• For an FCC lattice which of the zone axes [1 0 0], [1 1 0] and![1 1 1] will show a FOLZ?
• FCC planes with h, k, l mixed even and odd are absent
• [1 0 0]: FOLZ equation gives h = 1; possible with h k l all odd so see FOLZ
• [1 1 0]: h + k = 1; impossible for h k l all even or all odd so no FOLZ
• [1 1 1]: h + k + l= 1; possible with h k l all odd so see FOLZ
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
HOLZ for higher symmetry• HOLZ reflections introduce a third dimension of reciprocal lattice
into SADP (diffraction from planes inclined to e-beam)
• These HOLZ reflections can show higher order symmetry not present in the ZOLZ – example FCC Al on [1 1 1] zone axis. FOLZ shows 3-fold symmetry (look carefully!)
ZOLZ only ZOLZ and FOLZ
7
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Convergent beam electron diffraction
8
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Instead of parallel illumination with selected-area aperture, CBED uses!highly converged illumination to select a much smaller specimen region
Convergent beam electron diffraction
Small illuminated area => !no thickness and orientation variations
There is dynamical scattering, but it is useful!
Can obtain disc and line patterns!“packed” with information:
9
Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Convergent beam electron diffraction
10
Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Convergent beam electron diffraction
11
Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Convergent beam electron diffraction
12
Figures from Williams & Carter “Transmission Electron Microscopy”
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Convergent beam electron diffraction
13
Image plane:!see image of focused
e-beam
Back-focal plane
Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Convergent beam electron diffraction
Exact 2-beam condition
Near 2-beam condition
14
Image plane:!see image of focused
e-beam
Back-focal plane
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Excess and Deficient lines
15
0 0 0
kIkDkk
• Look at Ewald sphere construction – here Ewald sphere intersects a HOLZ reflection exactly.In this condition this HOLZ reflection must give 2!B scattering angle.
• If we draw in rays for excess and deficient lines at +!B and –!B relative to the planes making thereflection we see excess line intersects HOLZ reflection and deficient 0 0 0 exactly.
• If we plot full angular range of incident beam it is clear that deficient HOLZ line crosses 0 0 0 disc.
0 0 0
kIkDkk
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Excess and Deficient lines
16
• Look at Ewald sphere construction – here Ewald sphere intersects a HOLZ reflection exactly.In this condition this HOLZ reflection must give 2!B scattering angle.
• If we draw in rays for excess and deficient lines at +!B and –!B relative to the planes making thereflection we see excess line intersects HOLZ reflection and deficient 0 0 0 exactly.
• If we plot full angular range of incident beam it is clear that deficient HOLZ line crosses 0 0 0 disc.
0 0 0
kIkDkk
0 0 0
kIkDkk
0 0 0
kIkDkk
0 0 0
kIkDkk
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
HOLZ lines in CBED
• If HOLZ CBED discs at have excess lines at Bragg condition these give corresponding deficient lines crossing 0 0 0 disc
17
Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL 18
HOLZ lines in CBEDBecause HOLZ lines contain 3D information, they also show true symmetry!
e.g. three-fold {111} symmetry for cubic Al- unlike apparent six-fold axis in SADP or from ZOLZ Kikuchi lines
JEMS simulation for 300 nm thick Al, 200 keV beam energy
Deficient lines for inclined planes: Fringes from 2D
interactions/dynamical scattering; more
thickness gives more fringes
-3 -7 115 7 -117 5 -11
hU + kV + lW =?
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Thickness measurement by CBED• Within CBED discs also obtain patterns from dynamical scattering. These patterns show fringes that
are somewhat analogous to thickness fringes in the TEM image.
• Can measure thickness e.g. by comparing experimental data to simulation
• Example: Blochwave simulations for Al on [0 0 1] zone axis:
19
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
• Easier to think about in 2-beam Bragg scattering condition
• Different rays in the scattered beam sample different excitation errors for the reflection g
• Effectively we make a map of intensity for different excitation errors s along a chord in the disc g
• As thickness increases nodes in sinc2 function move to smaller s (reciprocal relationship with thickness) => more fringes in the disc
20
t = 10 nm t = 25 nm t = 50 nm
Intensity vs s for 2-beam condition, different specimen thicknesses t
Thickness measurement by CBED
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL 21
• Therefore to obtain CBED discs with 1-D fringes for thickness measurement tilt to 2-beam condition
• Possible to calculate thickness analytically (e.g. see Williams & Carter)
• Example: Blochwave simulations for Al with (0 0 2) reflection excited:
Thickness measurement by CBED
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Identifying polarity in CBED
22
Patterns from dynamical scattering in direct and diffraction discs allow determination of polarity of non-centrosymmetric crystals because dynamical scattering patterns are sensitive to
channeling down particular atomic column
T. Mitate et al. Phys. Stat. Sol. (a)!192, 383 (2002)
Simulation vs experiment:JEMS simulation: GaN [1 -1 0 0] zone axis
t = 100 nm
t = 150 nm
t = 200 nm
t = 250 nm
000-2 0000 0002
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Zone axis CBED• Instead of spot pattern, obtain disc pattern
• Larger convergence semi-angle α => larger discs
Parallel beam SADP Si [001] α = 1.6 mrad α = 3.9 mrad
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Zone axis CBED• Instead of spot pattern, obtain disc pattern
• Larger convergence semi-angle α => larger discs
α = 8.6 mradα = 3.9 mrad α = 19.3 mrad
See fringes in discs, and symmetry
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Convergent beam electron diffraction – practical example
ZnO thin-film sample;Conditions: convergent beam, large condenser aperture, diffraction mode
25
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Convergent beam electron diffraction – practical example
ZnO thin-film sample;Conditions: convergent beam, large condenser aperture, diffraction mode
[1 1 0] zone axis
26
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Kikuchi diffraction
27
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Kikuchi lines
• Formation of bright and dark lines (“excess” and “deficient” lines) by combination of inelastic scattering followed by elastic scattering in parallel incident beam geometry (e.g. SADP)
• Inelastic scattering is incoherent (no preferential scattering vectors) but is generally in forwards direction
• Cones of inelastically-scattered electrons then elastically scattered, creating arcs in the diffraction plane. Because angles are small the arcs look straight.
• Resultant lines are very similar to the excess and deficient lines of CBED. They are equally sensitive to specimen orientation, and we use them e.g. to set a 2-beam condition. However the specimen must be thick (for sufficient inelastic scattering) and flat (to have sharp lines) to see them well.
2828
• Treat problem in “real space”
• Treat 2-beam Bragg scattering condition
• Yellow volume represents intensity distribution of inelastic scattering event; mainly forward scattered
• origin of inelastic scattering event:
"
h k lh k l– ––
"
"
"""""""""""
"""
h k l– – –h k l
2
Kikuchi line formation
29
h k l– – –h k l
" "
ghkl0 0 0
kI
kD
• Treat problem in reciprocal space; Ewald sphere construction
• Forward scattering from incoherent inelastic scattering gives diffuse intensity at low scattering angles around 0 0 0
• Exact Bragg condition: Kikuchi lines coincide with Bragg spots
Deficient line: forward-scattered inelastic intensity removed from Kikuchi line ! dark line on brighter background
Excess line: forward-scattered inelastic intensity redistributed into Kikuchi line ! bright line on low background
Kikuchi line formation
30
• Treat problem in “real space”
• Treat zone axis condition
Kikuchi line formation
h k lh k l– ––
""""
" ""
h k l– ––h k l31
• Treat problem in reciprocal space; Ewald sphere construction
• Remember Bragg spots only visible because of relrods and excitation error s
• Zone axis condition: (by geometry) Kikuchi lines halfway between Bragg spots
Symmetrical relationship so both Kikuchi lines should have same intensity
Kikuchi line formation
h k l h k l– ––
ghkl0 0 0–ghkls
kI
kD
32
2
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Kikuchi diffraction
33
Position of the Kikuchi line pairs of (excess and deficient) very sensitive to specimen orientationCan use to identify excitation vector; in particular s = 0 when diffracted beam coincides!
exactly with excess Kikuchi line (and direct beam with deficient Kikuchi line)
33
Quiz: what happens to width of Kikuchi line pairs as (h k l) indices become bigger? !Answer: larger indices (h k l) ! greater scattering angle "B ! larger width of line pairs
Figures by Jean-Paul Morniroli
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Kikuchi lines – “road map” to reciprocal space
34
Kikuchi lines traverse reciprocal space, converging on zone axes
- use them to navigate reciprocal space as you tilt the specimen!
Examples: Si simulations using JEMS
Si [1 1 0] Si [1 1 0] tilted off zone axis Si [2 2 3]
Obviously Kikuchi lines can be useful, but can be hard to see (e.g. from insufficient thickness, diffuse lines from crystal bending, strain). Need an alternative method...
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Mapping in nano-beam diffraction mode
35
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Nano-beam set-up• In nano-beam mode, use small C2 condenser aperture and excited 3rd condenser
lens (e.g. condenser mini-lens) to make near-parallel beam of 2–3 nm diameter on specimen surface
• Typical convergence semi-angle alpha ~0.5–1 mrad; therefore obtain spot-like diffraction patterns from very small probe
36
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
Orientation image mapping in TEM• The NanoMEGAS ASTAR system scans the nano-
beam across sample while recording diffraction patterns to make a map with one diffraction pattern for every pixel positions x, y
• “Template” matching then used to identify phase and orientation; each pattern correlated with 100s-1000s of patterns simulated at different orientations and for different phases
• Much higher spatial resolution than EBSD in SEM, and angular resolution of 1°
• Can combine with precession for greater reliability of indexing
37
[1] E.F. Rauch et al., Micros. Anal. Nanotech. Supplement, 22(6), S5-S8 ,2008
Duncan Alexander: Diffraction – Going Further CIME, EPFL
ASTAR example: nanocrystalline ZnO• Plan-view sample of textured, nanocrystalline ZnO thin-film
• 750 x 750 pixel map, 2–3 nm probe size, 2 nm step size
38
A. Brian Aebersold, CIME{0001}
{10-10}
{2-1-10}Z X
Y