diarea vs leokosit

Upload: daffaa-mahardika

Post on 03-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    1/12

    Advance Publication

    The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science

    Accepted Date: 13 Jun 2011

    J-STAGE Advance Published Date: 27 Jun 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    2/12

    1

    Note1

    Internal Medicine2

    3

    Title:Relationship between Diarrhea and Peripheral Leukocyte Population in4

    Neonatal Japanese Black Calves5

    6

    Hiromichi OHTSUKA1)

    , Machiko MUKAI2)

    , Erika TANAMI2)

    , Mayumi7

    TOKITA1)

    , Yayoi HASHIBA1)

    , Masayuki KOHIRUIMAKI2)

    , Ken-ichi8

    SHIBANO3)

    Kiyoshi MIURA4)

    and Stephen MORRIS5)

    9

    10

    Running head; LEUKOCYTE POPULATION IN NEONATAL CALVES11

    12

    1)School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University, Towada, Aomori 034-8628,13

    2)Kohiruimaki Animal Medical Service, Tohoku, Aomori 039-2683, 3)Hyogo Prefecture14

    Federation of Agricultural Mutual Aid Association, Tanba, Hyogo 669-3309,4)

    Tanko15

    Agricultural Mutual Relief Association, Oshu, Iwate, 023-0023, Japan,5)

    College of16

    Sciences, Massey University, Palmaerston North 4442, New Zealand.17

    18

    Correspondenceto HIROMICHI OHTSUKA19

    Tel: +008-0176-23-437120

    Fax: +008- 0176-23-870321

    E-mail address:[email protected]

    23

    24

    25

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    3/12

    2

    AbstractNeonatal Japanese Black (JB) calves show a high incidence of diarrhea. The26

    objective of this study was to analyze the immune cell populations of neonatal JB27

    calves in detail and examine its correlation with the incidence of diarrhea immediately28

    after birth.Understanding the immune cell populations is helpful in clinic in order to29determine the condition of immune system thus for prevention of diseases. Blood30

    samples were obtained from JB calves on the day of birth. The peripheral leukocyte31

    populations were analyzed separately for calves that had diarrhea within 2 weeks after32

    birth (diarrhea group; n=26) and for calves without diarrhea (control group; n=74).The33numbers of the peripheral blood CD3

    +TcR1-N12

    +and CD8

    +T cells were significantly34

    lower in the diarrhea group compared to the control group. These findings suggest that35

    the congenital lower peripheral T cell and CD8+ T cell results in a high risk of36

    diarrhea in the neonatal JB calves.37

    Keywords: Diarrhea, Japanese Black calves, Leukocyte population38

    39

    40

    41

    42

    43

    44

    45

    46

    47

    48

    49

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    4/12

    3

    Neonatal calves are exposed to a large number of infectious microorganisms,50

    including viruses, bacteria, and parasites, immediately after birth. There is a high51

    incidence of infectious diseases in calves, resulting in swelling of joints, diarrhea,52

    pneumonia, or meningitis in their early lives. Neonates showed substantially lower53

    percentages of IFN- producing CD4+ and CD8

    +cells, and a negative correlation54

    between gestational age and IFN-producing CD4+, IL-2 producing CD8

    +, and IL-1055

    producing CD4+ cells [3]. In the former study peripheral CD4

    + and CD8

    + T cell56

    percentages in Holstein calves were the highest in the fetus and these percentages57

    decreased after birth and became lower than adult levels by 120 days of age [21]. T58

    cell percentage was the highest at birth and it decreased to the adult level by 5 months59

    of age [8]. It was known that significant decrease in T cells is observed healthy60

    newborns, this incidence has been examined due to low reactivity to hrIL-2 of blood61

    mononuclear cells of preterm neonates as compared with adult [10]. The lower number62

    of T cells may account for low cytokine production in response to bacterial infection in63

    neonates. Immune cells are less functional and ineffective in mounting an immune64

    response in the first week of life, and this immune immaturity seems to be one of the65

    reasons of high susceptibility to infections in neonatal calves.66

    Japanese Black (JB) calves with weak calves syndrome (WCS), such as low birth67

    weight, sickness, depression, weakness, reluctant standing, and poor suckling, are68

    frequently observed within a week after birth [12]. We previously reported lower69

    peripheral CD8+T cells and T cells in JB calves with WCS during the first month of70

    birth [13]. In human, T cell repertoire is established during the last fetal development71

    prior to the birth, thus thymectomy does not cause immediate immunodeficiency after72

    birth [4, 5]. Neonatal immune responses have been extensively studied in murine73

    models, and these studies showed lower cell proliferation and cytokine responses to74

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    5/12

    4

    stimuli at birth than in adulthood [1, 15, 16]. There is a paucity of research, which75

    evaluates immune status in fetal JB calves at birth. Therefore, in order to clarify whether76

    lower peripheral leukocyte population already existed before the onset of diarrhea in77

    neonatal JB calves, peripheral leukocyte populations were analyzed on the day of birth.78

    One hundred JB calves housed on one farm in Aomori, Japan were examined in this79

    study. Artificial suckling was applied to all calves 3 to 5 days after birth. Twenty-six80

    calves developed diarrhea within 2 weeks after birth (diarrhea group) and the other81

    seventy-four calves did not show diarrhea during this period (control group). Ten calves82

    in the diarrhea group and five calves in the control group were the first calves of their83

    dams. Ten out of 26 calves in the diarrhea group, and 41 out of 74 calves in the control84

    group were male. Depression, dehydration, and white watery feces were observed in the85

    diarrhea group during the sick period within 2 weeks after birth, and these animals were86

    treated with transfusion of Ringer and glucosesolutionsand injection of antibiotics. All87

    diseased calves recovered within 3 to 5 days after treatment. We observed unexpected88

    fever of some calves in this group, but watery diarrhea did not reoccurred after89

    treatment. The watery diarrhea was not observed in all calves after 2 weeks. There was90

    no case of dystocia, and the peripheral leukocyte populations of all calves were91

    examined on the day of birth after consuming sufficient colostrum. Body weights of all92

    calves were recorded on the day of birth.93

    Blood samples were collected into one tube with dipotassium-EDTA. The total94

    number of the white blood cells (WBC) was determined using a blood cell counter95

    (CelltacMEK-6358, NIHON KOHDEN, Tokyo, Japan).96

    Leukocytes surface receptors were determined using single or two-color staining of97

    peripheral blood mononuclear cells using specific antibodies listed in Table 1.98

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    6/12

    5

    Leukocytes were isolated from 2 mL of blood after lysing red blood cell by adding 4 mL99

    of 0.83% ammonium chloride solution. After hemolysis and washing with PBS (pH =100

    7.2), WBC were resuspended in cold PBS. WBC (1x106) were incubated with101

    monoclonal antibodies at 4 oC for 60 min. After washing with PBS, the cells were102

    incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM and103

    phycoerythrin-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa,104

    California, USA) at 4 oC for 30 min.After washing the labeled WBC with PBS, the flow105

    cytometric analysis was performed using a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences106

    Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA, USA). Data from 10000 events per sample107

    were analyzed using Cell Quest software (BD).108

    Statistical analysis was performed for each parameter in order to find the differences109

    between the two groups using Mann-Whitney test and correlation among the data of110

    each parameter using Pearsons test. The differences between groups were considered111

    significant at P < 0.05.112

    Body weight of male calves (30.7 1.1 kg) and female calves (26.5 0.7 kg) in the113

    diarrhea group was significantly lower than that of male calves (33.5 0.8 kg) and114

    female calves (29.6 0.7 kg) in the control group, respectively (P< 0.05). The number115

    of WBC was lower in the diarrhea group (90.0 6.9 102/l) than the control group116

    (110.7 4.4 102/l). The calves in the diarrhea group had lower numbers of117

    CD3+TcR1-N12

    +, CD8

    + T cells, and CD14

    + cells (Table 2). There was no significant118

    difference in CD4+ T cells. A significant positive correlation was observed between119

    body weight and peripheral CD3+TcR1-N12

    +T cell (R=0.39, p

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    7/12

    6

    We reported that peripheral T cells and CD8+T cells remained low in JB calves123

    with WCS in the first month after birth [13], but it was not clear whether these T cells124

    were lower on the day of birth. In the present study, lower numbers of peripheral T125

    cell and CD8+T cell were observed at birth in the calves, which developed diarrhea126

    within 2 weeks after birth. Lower number of T cells seemed to be associated with the127

    incidence of diarrhea in JB calves.128

    T cells display tissue-specific accumulation in response to infection. Neonatal T129

    cells are functionally different from the majority of adult T cells and display a130

    distinct TCR repertoire and accessory molecule profiles. T cells obtained from cord131

    blood had weak cytolytic activity in tumor cell killing assay [11]. Cytotoxic CD8+T132

    cells are the main cells that kill virus infected cells, and a decrease in this subset of cells133

    would diminish the ability to control viral infection, as reported in other animal models134

    [17]. Infants with a severe clinical respiratory syncytial virus infection exhibited135

    significantly lower CD8+T cell and CD8

    +/CD25

    +(activated) T cell counts in the acute136

    phase of illness [6], and the number of peripheral CD8+T cells of infants with severe137

    disease were significantly lower compared with those of infants with milder forms of138

    illness [2]. T cell or CD8+T cell represent important effector cells in immune system,139

    and lower number of these T cells in the diarrhea group might indicate that those140

    neonates are more immune-suppressed.141

    The calves in the diarrhea group had significantly lighter body weight and higher142

    percentage of primiparous dams. Neonatal calves largely depend on the dams for their143

    physical development prior to calving. All muscle tissue, nerve fibers, and energy144

    reserves present in the calf are dependent on the nutritional status of the dam, and thus it145

    is highly likely that weak calves were born to dams with undernourished condition [9].146

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    8/12

    7

    In human, T cell responses are immature at birth compared to adults [15], and the147

    premature neonates demonstrated a significantly lower number of T cells [7, 14]. In148

    addition, development of peripheral T cell or B cells after birth was suppressed in JB149

    calves that were born from dams with insufficient nutrition during the last gestation or150

    calves born from primiparous dams [19]. Thymic hypoplasia associated with decreased151

    immune function was reported in calves with stillbirth/perinatal WCS, and it was152

    suggested that intrauterine growth retardation was caused by lack of growth factors153

    during the fetal period [18]. Taken together, results of the present study suggest a154

    disturbance of T cell development during the last gestation since this period can155

    influence a peripheral leukocyte population in newborn JB calves.156

    The principal observation in the present study was lower peripheral T cell and157

    CD8+T cell in JB calves with diarrhea. This reduced immune condition could aggravate158

    infectious diseases, and may explain some of the immunologic abnormalities159

    accompanied by diarrhea. The reason for no difference in CD4+ T cell between two160

    groups in this study is not clear. Children born very preterm had significantly lower161

    CD4+ T cell percentages compared with the healthy controls [20]. Potent immune162

    activation in early life of JB calves might contribute to protection from bacterial163

    infection. It is still unclear what are ideal immune conditions for keeping JB calves164

    healthy. Further studies are needed in this field.165

    ACKNOWLEGEMENTS. The authors are grateful to Dr. Ogata of Yamagata166

    Agricultural Mutual Relief Association for support in this study, and indebted to all farm167

    owners and farm personnel in the enrolled farms for their cooperation. This research168

    was supported in part by a Grant for Encouragement from Kitasato University.169

    170

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    9/12

    8

    REFERENCES171

    172

    [1] Adkins, B., Leclerc, C. and Marshall-Clarke, S. 2004. Neonatal adaptive immunity173

    comes of age.Nat. Rev. Immunol.4:553564.174

    [2] De Weerd, W., Twilhaar, W.N. and Kampen, J.L.L. 1998. T cell subset analysis in175

    peripheral blood of children with RSV bronchiolitis. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.30:7780.176

    [3] Gasparoni, A., Ciardelli, L., Avanzini, A., Castellazzi, A.M., Carini, R., Rondini, G.177

    and Chirico, G. 2003. Age-related changes in intracellular TH1/TH2 cytokine178

    production, immunoproliferative T lymphocyte response and natural killer cell179

    activity in newborns, children and adults.Biol. Neonate. 84:297-303.180

    [4] Haynes, B.F. and Heinly, C.S. 1995. Early human T cell development: analysis of181

    the human thymus at the time of initial entry of hematopoietic stem cells into the182

    fetal thymic microenvironment.J. Exp. Med.181:1445-1458.183

    [5] Haynes, B.F., Sempowski, G.D., Wells, A.F. and Hale, L.P. 2000. The human thymus184

    during aging.Immunol Res. 22:253-261.185

    [6] Isaacs, D., Bangham, C. R. M. and McMichael. A. J. 1987. Cell-mediated cytotoxic186

    response to respiratory syncytial virus in infants with bronchiolitis. Lancet187

    330:769771.188

    [7] Jureti, E., Uzarevi, B., Petrovecki, M. and Jureti, A. 2000. Two-color flow189

    cytometric analysis of preterm and term newborn lymphocytes. Immunobiology190

    202:421-428.191

    [8] Kampen, A.H., Olsen, I., Tollersrud, T., Storset, A.K. and Lund, A. 2006.192

    Lymphocyte subpopulations and neutrophil function in calves during the first 6193

    months of life. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.113:53-63.194

    [9] Kume, S., Toharmat, T. and Kobayashi, N. 1998. Effect of restricted feed intake of195

    dams and heat stress on mineral status of newborn calves. J. Dairy Sci.196

    81:1581-1590.197

    [10] Miceli Sopo, S., Pesaresi, M.A., Celestini, E., Piastra, M., Stabile, A.M., Rumi, C.,198

    Bussa, S. and Stabile, A. 1992. Interleukin 2 proliferative response by cord blood199

    mononuclear cells of term and preterm neonates.Allergol. Immunopathol.20:91-95.200

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    10/12

    9

    [11] Morita, C.T., Parker, C.M., Brenner, M.B. and Band, H. 1994 TCR usage and201

    functional capabilities of human gamma delta T cells at birth. J. Immunol.202

    153:3979-3988.203

    [12] Ogata, Y., Nakao, T., Takahashi, K., Abe, H., Misawa, T., Urushiyama, Y. and Sakai,204

    J. 1999. Intrauterine growth retardation as a cause of perinatal mortality in Japanese205

    black beef calves.Zentralbl Veterinarmed A.46:327-334.206

    [13] Ohtsuka, H., Fukunaga, N., Hara, H., Fukuda, S., Hayashi, T., Hoshi, F., Yoshino,207

    T., Koiwa, M. and Kawamura, S. 2003. Changes in peripheral leukocyte populations208

    of weak calf syndrome of Japanese black calves.J. Vet. Med. Sci. 65:793-796.209

    [14] Peoples, J.D., Cheung, S., Nesin, M., Lin, H., Tatad, A.M., Hoang, D., Perlman,210

    J.M. and Cunningham-Rundles, S. 2009. Neonatal cord blood subsets and cytokine211

    response to bacterial antigens.Am. J. Perinatol.26:647-657.212

    [15] Schaub, B., Liu, J., Schleich, I., Hppler, S., Sattler, C. and von Mutius, E. 2008.213

    Impairment of T helper and T regulatory cell responses at birth. Allergy214

    63:1438-1447.215

    [16] Siegrist, C.A. 2001. Neonatal and early life vaccinology. Vaccine19:33313346.216

    [17] Sopper, S., Sauer, U., Hemm, S., Demuth, M., Mller, J., Stahl-Hennig, C.,217

    Hunsmann, G., ter Meulen, V. and Drries, R. 1998. Protective role of the218

    virus-specific immune response for development of severe neurologic signs in simian219

    immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques.J. Virol. 72:99409947.220

    [18] Takasu, M., Shirota, K., Ohba, Y., Nishii, N., Murase, T., Miyazawa, K. and221

    Kitagawa, H. 2008. Thymic hypoplasia in Japanese black calves with222

    stillbirth/perinatal weak calf syndrome.J. Vet. Med. Sci. 70:1173-1177.223

    [19] Tanami, E., Ohtsuka, H., Mukai, M., Kohiruimaki, M., Ogata, M. and Kawamura,224

    S. 2009. Effect of nutritive condition in the dam during the later pregnant period to225

    peripheral leukocyte population in Japanese Black calves after birth.J. Jpn. Vet. Med.226

    Assoc.62:623-629.227

    [20] Wang-Rodriguez, J., Fry, E., Fiebig, E., Lee, T., Busch, M., Mannino, F. and Lane,228

    T.A. 2000. Immune response to blood transfusion in very-low-birth weight infants.229

    Transfusion 40:25-34.230

    [21] Wilson, R.A., Zolnai, A., Rudas, P. and Frenyo, L.V. 1996. T-cell subsets in blood231

    and lymphoid tissues obtained from fetal calves, maturing calves, and adult bovine.232

    Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.53:49-60.233

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    11/12

    Table1. Monoclonal antibodies against bovine leukocyte antigens used for flow cytometric analysis

    Antibodies Clone Isotype Specificity Source

    CD3 MM1A IgG1 Pan T cell VMRD1

    CD4 CACT138A IgG1 Helper/inducer VMRDCD8 BAT82A IgG1 Cytotoxic VMRD

    TcR1-N12 CACT61A IgM T cell VMRD

    MHC class II CAT82A IgG1 B cell / Monocyte VMRD

    CD14 MY4 IgG2b Monocyte Coulter1VMRD=VMRD, Inc. (pullman, WA, USA)

    2Coulter=Coulter Immunology Hailed (Florida, USA)

  • 8/13/2019 Diarea vs Leokosit

    12/12

    Table 2. Peripheral leukocytes numbers in two groups

    Cell Type diarrhea group control group P value

    CD3+TcR1-N12

    -(cell/l) 546.152.5 664.057.1 0.482

    CD3+TcR1-N12

    +(cell/l) 425.365.0 721.862.5 0.011

    CD4+ (cell/l) 125.624.8 131.010.4 0.832

    CD8+

    (cell/l) 122.019.9 199.916.0 0.001

    CD4+/CD8

    +rate 0.960.16 0.640.05 0.292

    MHC class-+CD14

    -(cell/l) 119.123.9 144.311.5 0.545

    CD14+

    (cell/l) 340.755.2 531.852.1 0.088

    Values are expressed as the meanS.E.