dewatering refractory castable monoliths aachen 1999

Upload: ahmed-mostafa-al-aboudy

Post on 02-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths Aachen 1999

    1/11

    41. INTERNATIONALE FEUERFESTKOLLOQIUM, AACHEN 1998

    Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths

    Ing. Molin Adam, Deputy Director, R&D, Refrasil,s.r.o. Czech Republic

    Sznapkova Petra, student, VSB Ostrava Czech Republic

    Josiek Bogdan, R&D, Refrasil,s.r.o. Czech Republic

    http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22
  • 8/10/2019 Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths Aachen 1999

    2/11

    Abstract:

    This paper deals with the investigations carried out on the field of dewatering of

    refractory castable precast shapes. Several grades of refractory castables have been prepared

    with diffrent cement content (CC,LCC,ULCC,NCC) including a selflevelling grade.Based on

    permeability measurements, DTA curves, apperent porosity values and strength of the

    investigated specimens depending on temperature in the range between 100-600 C the most

    critical dewatering areas for particular types of refractory castables have been found. The

    paper provides us with a clue how to dry out and heat up refractory castables to make the

    process effective and safer.

    1. Introduction.

    Since the early days of 80th

    we have been following the falling interest in using shaped

    refractory materials , a part of which has been gradualy replaced by precast shapes, mostly

    made of refractory castables. This trend towards monoliths has been brought about by both

    changes of user technologies and by the advantage itself of newly developped and

    sophisticated refractory castable formulations. These are based on a very dense structure with

    extremely low porosity due to the employment of continuous aggregate grading schemes by

    introducing particles finer than the cementitous components. Water demand has fallen down,

    in some cases down to a half of the value of conventional castables, previously used. In spite

    of the fact that water content has been decreased significantly, explosive spalling tendency

    has even increased. Judging from experience it is just the fear of explosive spalling that in

    many cases and unfortunately causes that bricks are used for linings where monoliths are

    expected to perform better.

    http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22
  • 8/10/2019 Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths Aachen 1999

    3/11

    Lot of work has been already done in the field of dewatering of refractory castable

    monoliths, heaps of paper have beentyped. We seem to have solved it, because key factors

    have been described, computer modelling has been introduced, lot of laboratory and on-site-

    trials have been carried out, but still much to our consternation we come accrosss situations in

    practice where we are almost helpless and we in fact do not know how to go about

    dewatering. Despite all these work already done there is still a long way to go.

    The aim of this paper is to contribute a bit to better understanding of dewatering

    process of refractory castable monoliths in view of cement contents, flowability and fiber

    addition effect.

    2.

    Dewatering of Refractory Castable Precast Shapes

    In the coarse of drying and heating of monoliths cast of refractory castables a physically

    bonded water and consequently a chemically bonded one is dehydrated from the material.

    The water content and the ratio between the two types of water bonded in the material

    depends also on cement content ( type ) of refractory castable. Dewatering process is

    usually finished around the temperature of 600C. There is a number of variables that

    influence the process (1) :

    Texture Moisture Content

    Mix Constitution Casting and Curing Practice

    Permeability Binder Level and Type

    Strength Dryout Practice and Schedule

    Thermal Conductivity Installation Geometry

    http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22
  • 8/10/2019 Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths Aachen 1999

    4/11

    For the purpose of this work permeability measurements, cold crushing strength

    developments and weight losses avaluations have been selected as they directly relate to how

    a certain amount of steam can be led out throgh refractory body with a certain permeability

    and strength. If permeability and strength is high, water or steam can be driven through

    refractory body almost irrespective of how quick the material is dried. It goes without saying

    that there are limits. There is a narrow relationship between permeability (porosity) and

    corrossion media penetration. We are looking for a solution to make the refractory body both

    permeable for moisture and resistant against corrossion penetration. But this is hehind the

    frame of this paper. As organic fiber addition increases permeability and thus the explosive

    spalling resistance, fiber additions have been investigated.

    3. Experimental Procedure

    Laboratory tests were carried out on(with?) cylinders, dimensions of which were 50 x

    50 mm. CC, LCC, ULCC and NCC bauxite based mixes were vibration cast, SFLC

    cylindrical specimens were cast without vibration. Specimens were dried at 110C and

    subsequently tempered at 200, 300, 400, 500, 600C/4hours. One cylindrical specimen was

    used for permeability study, another one was used for porosity testing and one more for cold

    crushing strength tests. Cylinders weight was recorded so weight losses could be measured

    after every stage (heating at a temperature). Tests were suplemented by DTA and GTA for all

    the types of castable used. These tests were conducted with samples of crushed and ground

    cylinders having been previously cured at ambient temperature.

    A study on organic fiber adition to castable were carried out using polypropylene

    fibers to SFLC as a baseline formulation. Since fibers incorporation into a castable causes a

    change in casting behavior of the material, an aditional water had to be involved to obtain the

    http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22
  • 8/10/2019 Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths Aachen 1999

    5/11

    same flowability. A simple flow test was carried out to determine the apropriate water content

    for each fiber loading such that the flow degree remained constant regardless of fiber

    concentration.Cylindrical specimens cast with different fiber contents ( 0; 0.03; 0.06; 0.1;

    0.2 wt%) were heated at 300C/4hours, then the same procedure was used as described

    previously.

    4, Results and Discussion

    Results on cold crushing strength after heat treatment at temperatures 100 600C for

    studied castables with differennt cement contents are ilustarated in Figure 1. It was evident

    that cold crushing strength development after heating indicated no significant difference in the

    range of 100 600C. CC formulations displayed obviously lower strength values after

    drying at 100C and moreover this strength decreased slightly with the temperature growing

    due to decomposition of high alumina cements. NCC formulations followed the similar run

    with just strength values being higher. SFLC formulation showed very high strength values

    after drying at 110C and further heat treatments up to 600C did not indicate any significant

    change. LCC and ULCC specimens showed slight strength increase upon heating while the

    ULCC values were lower.

    Results on permeability testing versus temperature of heat treatment,coupled by

    weight losses, are ilustrated in Figures 2,3. There is a huge difference between CC

    permeability values and those cast of the others formulations. Permeability data of CC

    specimens were five fold higher and moreover these values increase as a function of heat

    treatment was more noticable. The higher the density of the castable the lower permeability of

    the monolith As far as weight losses of CC monoliths are concerned the most significant

    change occured at around 300C. With cement content dropping in monoliths the value of

    weight losses was decreasing and the temperature of a maximum loss mooved from 300C to

    http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22
  • 8/10/2019 Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths Aachen 1999

    6/11

    200C, whereas NCC mix displayed again the maximum at about 300C like CC mix but with

    permeability values being considerably lower. Figure4 ilustrates the relation between

    cumulative weight losses and temperature. During the heat treatment 100 600C weight

    values were dropping, obviously the most significant change showed CC material (around

    300C.) Other mixes showed a slight weight decrease at temperatures up to 500C, values of

    these changes were dropping with cement content going down. Above 500C there was no

    significant weight loss for all the types of castable.

    DTA and GTA curves are not listed in the paper due to limited space. CC mix showed

    two endothermic reactions at 150 and 300C. LCC showed a flat endothermic reaction at

    200C, ULCC showed no significant change. DTA curve of NCC displayed slow endothermic

    reactions at 150 and 540C.

    Polypropylene fibers addition tests showed generally the decrease in properties once

    polypropylene fibers were added to castable. Figure5 indicates that the addition rate of

    0,03wt.% caused water demand increase by 0,5wt.%. Fiber content 0,1wt.% seemed to be a

    limited value from selfflowability standpoint of the castable under investigation. Castable

    with 0,2wt.% fibers loading was vibration cast, because no selfflowability was observed. Cold

    crushing strength values also decreased with fibers addition. The most significant drop in

    CCS was observed when 0,1wt.% of fibers was added. Figure6 showes porosity and

    permeability development when polypropylene fibers were incorporated to selfflowing

    bauxite based castable. It was evident that fiber addition to castable resulted in conduits being

    created within refractory body, these conduits connected particular pores making the body

    permeable. Fiber adition of 0,2wt.% caused 1,7 fold porosity increase, whereas permeability

    values raised by almost 50 times. The most noticeable permeability increase was indicated

    when 0,3 0,6wt.% of fibers were added.

    http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22
  • 8/10/2019 Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths Aachen 1999

    7/11

    5. Summary

    Results of this work on dewatering of refractory castable precast shapes showed on

    some of the existing relations between explosive spalling tendency and permeability, porosity,

    weight losses, strength. Investigations were conducted with refractory castables based on

    bauxite aggregate with different cement content (CC, LCC, ULCC, NCC) and workability

    (SFLC). Polypropylene fiber addition to selfflowing bauxite based castable was also

    investigated.

    There was a huge difference between CC properties and those of low cement and

    moisture content. This difference resulted from the principle itself of low moisture

    formulations,i.e. from the dense structure and low permeability. Apparent porosity values

    seemed to be of a less importance unlike permeability values that indicate how particular

    pores in the refractory body are connected and how monoliths are permeable for steam going

    through. With cement dropping in castables under investigation the explosive spalling

    tendency during dewatering increases, critical temoerature moves from300 to 200C (CC-

    LCC- ULCC), whereas NCC critical temperatureseems being again around 300C.

    In view of the fact that organic fiber aditions result in property decrease, particularly

    as far as selfflowing mixes are concerned , an optimum adition of 0,06wt.% to SFLC has been

    found out.

    For limited space of the paper and for the subject itself that is more complex it was

    impossible to deal with some of the aspects that would contribute to better understanding of

    dewatering processes.

    http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22
  • 8/10/2019 Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths Aachen 1999

    8/11

    References:

    1)Moore,R.E. Severinn N. : Dewatering Monolithic Refractory Castables: Experimental and

    Practical Experience . University of Missouri-Rolla, Department of Ceramic

    Engineering,p.573-582

    2)Jason M.Canon, Todd P. Sander:

    Effect of Organic Fiber Additions on Permeability of

    Refractory Concrete

    , UNITECR Proceedings1997, p.583

    http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22
  • 8/10/2019 Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths Aachen 1999

    9/11

    FIG. 1. COLD CRUSHING STRENGTH ASA FUNCTION OF HEAT TREATMENT TEMPERATURE

    FIG. 2. PERMEABILITY AND WEIGHT LOSSES VERSUS HEAT TREATMENT TEMPERATURE OF CC

    SPECIMENS

    FIG. 3. PERMEABILITY AND WEIGHT LOSSES VERSUS HEAT TREATMENT TEMPERATURE

    FIG. 4. CUMULATIVE WEIGHT LOSSES VERSUS TEMPERATURE

    FIG. 5. WATER DEMAND AND COLD CRUSHING STRENGTH AS A FUNCTION OF

    POLYPROPYLENE FIBER ADDITION

    FIG. 6. APPARENT POROSITY AND PERMEABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF POLYPROPYLENE FIBERADDITION

    http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22
  • 8/10/2019 Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths Aachen 1999

    10/11

    http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22
  • 8/10/2019 Dewatering Refractory Castable Monoliths Aachen 1999

    11/11

    http://www.pdfcomplete.com/cms/hppl/tabid/108/Default.aspx?r=q8b3uige22