developing+an+innovation+culture
TRANSCRIPT
8/6/2019 Developing+an+Innovation+Culture
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/developinganinnovationculture 1/8
Discussion paper for Department of Trade and Industry Innovation Review March 2003
DEVELOPING AN INNOVATION CULTURE:
IMPLICATIONS FROM RESEARCH
INSTITUTE OF WORK PSYCHOLOGY/ ESRC CENTRE FOR ORGANISATION AND
INNOVATION, UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD
Modern times have seen an iincreasing emphasis placed on innovation as a key
contributor to organizational success. Innovation not only concernsvers the creation of ideas
that are novel and useful to the workplace, but also includes the implementation of those
ideasem to produce develop new products or, services (i.e., product innovation) or and new
ways of working (e.gi.e., process innovation, for example though. changes in HRM practice
or work design).
The Institute of Work Psychology (IWP) has been conducting research in this area, for a
number of years and it has become apparent that a holistic approach is needed to initiate and
sustain innovation in organisations.
What would an innovative organisational culture look like? It would be one in which
employees are motivated and confident enough to continually try new things out. To this end,
employees They would also be equipped with the right types of knowledge, skills and abilities
to both effectively generate and implement new ideas. However, innovation will only
flourish if the work environment is supportive of these efforts. This means employees must
be given opportunities to explore, investigate and experiment, and management should
provide support through active encouragement of these types of behaviours. At a broader
level, the organisation itself should have structures and processes in place which that allow
for smooth transitions from appearance of new ideas to actualised innovationstheir
implementation.
How can such a culture be developed? Research conducted by IWP and others have
highlighted some of the overlapping means by which this culture can be grown:
o Selecting innovative employees
o Training for creativity and innovation
o Developing a general learning culture
o E Enabling empoweringment of employees
o Setting up idea capture schemes
o Developing managers to support the innovation of others
o Having Making creativity as a requirement of the job
o Improving employee participation in decision-making
o Having appropriate reward systems for innovation
o Allowing risk-taking as an acceptable mode of practice
o Encouraging investment in research and development functions
o Benchmarking on a regular basis
1
8/6/2019 Developing+an+Innovation+Culture
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/developinganinnovationculture 2/8
Discussion paper for Department of Trade and Industry Innovation Review March 2003
Each of these approaches will beis elaborated upon evaluated in the following discussion.
SELECTING INNOVATIVE EMPLOYEES
Studies over the years haveResearch has uncovered a wide range of potential attributes of
creative individuals. Some of these characteristics refer toare fairly stable personality traits
but other aspects are more malleable knowledge, skill and motivational dimensions.
Recently, psychometric measures have been developed by IWP staff for tapping into the
general traits which identify consistently innovative individuals ( i.e. those good at both
generating and implementing ideas). The Ff our key traits include are: an openness to frequent
change;, active championing of change; , having unstructured approaches to work ; and a
preference to try doing things differently. This instrument provides a practical way forward
for helping to select innovators into the organisation, measure and is now being used by a
number of organisations for recruitment purposes.
Such instruments will help identify strongly innovative individuals, but a mixture of
personality types are needed in organisations. So there remains a and there is still a question
of what would be the optimal balance. FurthermoreMoreover,, given that most organisations
are not starting from scratch, they may have to settle for working with options to develop the
capabilities of the existing workforce. Although relatively few people are able to innovate in
a radical manner, everyone has the potential to be creative at some level or another. It is
better therefore to use these selection instruments for key, identified positions where
innovation is a major component of the job. Also, even if highly innovative individuals have
been selected, they will be unlikely to innovate if the work environment is unsupportive (e.g.
one with a lack of resources and time for creativity).
Policy implications:
o Select for innovation in key roles
o Encouraging diversity in organisational populations?
TRAINING FOR CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION
Another popular approach is to directly develop employees’ learning about innovationIt is
widely assumed that, the underlying belief being that creativity is a skill that can be learned
by anyone. For this reason many organisations send their employees This is typically done by
sending individuals on creativity training courses, that which cover techniques such
brainstorming, lateral thinking or problem-solving. Until recently, little evidence existedabout the effectiveness of such initiatives.
However, there has been very little formal published evaluation as to the effectiveness of
these types of courses. A A study done completed in IWP on three different types of creativity
course s found that they all improved the generation of ideas, but that idea implementation
was much more strongly determined by organizational factors (e.g. management support).
These findings combined with others provide some practical implications.
In order for individuals to fully learn about the innovation process, creativity courses should
cover opportunity finding, problem definition, idea generation, idea evaluation and idea
implementation. The skills needed for each of these aspects can differ and it appears that the
implementation side of things can often be ignored.
2
8/6/2019 Developing+an+Innovation+Culture
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/developinganinnovationculture 3/8
Discussion paper for Department of Trade and Industry Innovation Review March 2003
Training interventions can be used to enhance motivation and confidence to innovate, as well
as to develop creative thinking skills. Research has shown that motivation is a core
contributor to creative outputs. Within courses, these emotional aspects can be enhanced
through clarifying personal and organisational benefits of creativity, goal-setting and
providing sufficient feedback with practice.
As well as formal training, organisations can consider other routes to stimulate learning about
creativity. These include providing access to books, articles and web resources, setting up
innovation discussion groups and encouraging coaching by line managers.
Although these learning activities can be used to develop employees’ knowledge,
skills and attitudes concerning innovation, there will be little long-term impact if the work
environment they return to does not give them the support and freedom to express, develop
and apply their ideas.
Policy implications:
o Build in creativity and innovation training into MBAs or other courses (as the other
innovation review panel also recommend)Encourage development and assessment of innovation traininginnovation training within organisations.
o Develop innovation training to emcompass encompass implementation as well as idea
generation.
o Include innovation training within MBA and other professional development
programmes.
DEVELOPING A GENERAL LEARNING CULTURE
Evidence is gathering linking the extent to which organisations actively encourage continuous
learning and development in their employees with company innovativeness. By providing a
wide variety of opportunities for learning, organisations are exposing their workforce to a
greater variety of stimuli, developing the motivation of individuals to learn new things and
developing their knowledge and skills to work with new innovations. These are all conducive
to stimulating creativity
Policy implications:
o Support a culture of training and learning lifelong learning initiatives in organisations.
o Education of children and students to encourage more creative and autonomous thinking
and learning.
ENABLING EMPOWER INGMENT OF EMPLOYEES
Empowerment involves devolving responsibility for organising and managing work to
individuals or teams. For example, this can take the form of delegation, job enrichment
initiatives or setting up of autonomousself-managing work groups.
Research has shown that those with greater levels of control in their jobwho are empowered
tend to develop better understanding of their work and arebe more innovative and open to
new ideas. . In fact, there are indications that autonomy is a particularly strong influence on
the implementation of ideas as opposed to the generation of ideas. Empowerment influencesfacilitates innovation by not only giving employees the motivation, knowledge and
confidence to generate new ideas, but has especial value with respect to implementation, by
3
8/6/2019 Developing+an+Innovation+Culture
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/developinganinnovationculture 4/8
Discussion paper for Department of Trade and Industry Innovation Review March 2003
providing the opportunity to put their ideas into practice. but it can also enhance their
motivation, confidence and learning.
When instigating empowerment initiatives, it is vital to involve employees in the design of
new work practices from the start, and to have visible and active management support.
Policy implications:o Encourage empowerment with in organisations (especially those facing most change) .
o Involve employees in the development of empowerment practices.
?
SETTING UP IDEA CAPTURE SCHEMES
There are probably already many untapped ideas in the workforce, and idea capture
schemes (ICSs) are ways of harnessing the suggestions of all employees. Thesey are most
commonly thought of in terms of suggestion schemes, but can also refer to quality circles and
production development groups. In essence, they provide an opportunity for employees to
share their ideas so that their relevance and feasibility can be assessed. Savings from these
schemes can be huge substantial, but there is very low participation in UK organisations
compared to those abroad.
A study ofurvey of 160 organisations idea capture schemes was conducted by IWP.
on the design of ICSs and the success of employee suggestion making. More effective
schemes: involved end-users in the development of the scheme and its rewards, recognition
and feedback systems; gave timely, detailed and encouraging feedback to employees on their
ideas; had rewards (not just monetary ones) that were perceived as being fairly distributed and
valued by employees; engaged in sufficient marketing and continuous publicity to maintain
the momentum of the scheme; were given visible support by senior management; and
encouraged use of the schemes as part of daily work.
Policy implications:
o Dissemination of best practice in ICS schemes.
o I Government initiatives to support and rewardthe use of ICS schemes.
DEVELOPING MANAGERS TO SUPPORT THE INNOVATION OF OTHERS
Many studies have demonstrated that greater line management support is linked to greater
creativity of employees, especially with respect to the implementation of ideas. Further
workWithin IWP research has within IWP has set out to ascertain exactly what managers
supportive of innovation do. It has been found that managers they: help employees learnhow to innovate by sharing their knowledge, skills and experience and role-modelling the
desired behaviours; and; and they. They enhance employee motivation and confidence by
giving supportive encouragement and feedback.
The other key aspect is the extent to which the manager provides opportunities for innovation
by giving freedom and resources to employees and being open to challenge and willing to
change.
Again these types of managers can be selected into post according to the above criteria
or, more usefully, undergo training and development to develop the requisite capabilities. As
mentioned by the Innovation Review Panel, management skills in the UK need to be
enhanced and the management of innovation is a crucial aspect that should be addressed.
4
8/6/2019 Developing+an+Innovation+Culture
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/developinganinnovationculture 5/8
Discussion paper for Department of Trade and Industry Innovation Review March 2003
Policy implications:
o Ensuring that management of innovation is covered on MBAs and other types of
educational courses.
o Management of innovation as an NVQ element
MAKHAVING ING CREATIVITYINNOVATION AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE
JOB
Studies within IWP have indicated that, in many jobs, creativity is not seen as a requirement.
At the same time, the extent to which creativity is a formal requirement of the jobthe job is
strongly associated with the degree of innovation shown. Other research has shown that if
innovation is not overtly attended to currently, there is a danger that it can ly required by the
job influences an employee’s level of innovation. be seen as less and less important over
time.
Policy implications:
o Ensuring that innovation is a job requirement.
o Include innovation in career development and performance appraisals.
Practically, making innovation an explicit part of the job description should motivate and
focus creative efforts.
IMPROVING EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION IN DECISION-MAKING
The fact that employee participation is a key ingredient to innovation success is apparent
across the issues discussed above. A survey by IWP of 500 UK organisations showed that
those that conducted extensive internal and external discussion and negotiation prior to ideaimplementation, were more likely to produce successful innovations. By broadening
participation in decision-making, the organisation is encouraging a wider range of viewpoints
and ideas from which to choose., which is beneficial to creativity. It should alsoThis also
helps motivate recipients of innovationemployees by giving them a sense of ownership over
changes at work, as opposed to them resisting imposed changesalterations. Other benefits of
an increased sense of control have been outlined previously. Furthermore, research has
shown that employees’ participation in innovation is influenced by the degree to which they
trust the organisation will take their ideas seriously, indicating the importance of a climate of
openness and honesty.
Participation can extend beyond employees to other stakeholders such as customers. Findings
from research show thatsuggest that seeking the views of customers, or providing an
opportunity for them to comment, can supply an organisation with invaluable
feedback/information on, for instance, the quality, usefulness, or price of products or services.
Feedback from customers intuitively represents a major source of knowledge from which
ideas to improve existing products or services, or to develop new products and services, can
spring. Importantly, ideas and innovations originating from such feedback help to ensure that
customer demands are met, thereby contributing to organisational competitiveness and
growth.
Policy implications:
o Encour age aging organisational usage of systematic employee participation
initiativesve.s
5
8/6/2019 Developing+an+Innovation+Culture
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/developinganinnovationculture 6/8
Discussion paper for Department of Trade and Industry Innovation Review March 2003
o Involve customers or client in the participation process.
HAVING APPROPRIATE REWARD SYSTEMS FOR INNOVATION
The idea ofP providing employees with rewards for their innovation activities is an importantissue. At some level employees need to be acknowledged for their efforts and rewards can
take many forms apart from the financial. For example, informal recognition by from
immediate managers, public recognition in company newsletters or certificates of
achievement can also be valued by employees. Furthermore, it is felt by
researchersEspecially significant is the finding that employees that people will perform more
creatively if motivated by the work itself, rather than by rewards or punishments. This type
of intrinsic motivation can be developed by encouraging employees to explore ideas they find
personally exciting, reinforcing feelings of personal competence and creating an environment
where people can freely exchange ideas and explore areas of mutual interest.
Policy implications:
o Encourage recognition for innovation within organisations (not necessarily financially).
o Tax breaks for innovation?
ALLOWING RISK-TAKING AS AN ACCEPTABLE MODE OF PRACTICE
It is an established fact that a number of ideas must be produced in order to produce one
successful one, and that implementation is generally not right first time. An innovation
culture should reflect this by showing a tolerance for errors and and rewarding effort as well
outcomes. However, Tthere also needs to be an element of learning from any mistakes that
are made, by instigating regular reviews and reflective practices. It is apparent that the UK culture is currently more risk-averse than others abroad.
Policy implications:
o Promote reflection and learning from practice.
Policy-wise:
Risk assessment as a tool to be learned in courses
o Reflection and learning from practice, again a key component of management learningUse
risk assessment techniques alongside idea generation and implementation.
ENCOURAGING INVESTMENT IN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
IWP studies have confirmed that gGreater levels of investment in R&D are associated with
greater reported levels of innovation in organisations (though not more so than the kinds of
‘softer’ initiatives decribeddescribed above). Traditionally, R&D has been regarded as a
discrete function of the organisation devoted to the design of new products or services, but the
creation or adoption of new work processes can also come under this aegis. Activities in this
area can range from fundamental ‘blue sky’ research, where the intention is primarily to
develop scientific knowledge without having a predefined practical application, to tailoring of
specific products or processes to meet a particular need. R&D therefore represents a
conscious and planned effort by the organisation to innovate but it does need to be
strategically integrated with other functions such as production and marketing to be optimally
6
8/6/2019 Developing+an+Innovation+Culture
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/developinganinnovationculture 7/8
Discussion paper for Department of Trade and Industry Innovation Review March 2003
effective. Collaboration between organisations and the research community can enhance
such R&D, by bringing a broader perspective (see also benchmarking, below).
Policy implications:
o Encourage R&D into process as well as product innovation. Tax breaks for Researchand Development (already done?).
o Encouraging research into process as well as product innovation.Promote research
community and user collaboration in R&D.
BENCHMARKING
Many organisations actively undertake systematic approaches to locate and assess good
practice elsewhere in attempts to improve their own performance. Again, research has shown
that organisations that benchmark their operations more frequently tend to be classed as more
innovative. Benchmarking comparisons can be made both externally, with direct competitors
or those in other industries, and internally, examining similar operations within different partsof the organisation. Typical methods of gathering this type of knowledge include
observational visits, using surveys, attending conferences and workshops, conducting
literature reviews and analysing performance or operational data. Since these benchmarking
techniques are a means of introducing or generating ideas which that are new to an
organisation, this can greatly help an organisation to become more innovative.
In particular, organisations should benchmark themselves in terms of their innovation
processes and outcomes in order to highlight areas for improvement. IWP research within
Small and Medium Enterprises has led to the development of an innovation audit tool which
can be used for this purpose.
Policy implications:
o Support for benchmarking groups or initiatives
o National databases and studies to highlight the most effective organisational practices
o Support usage of innovation audit tools
Notes compiled by:
Kamal Birdi and Toby WallInstitute of Work Psychology (IWP) and
ESRC Centre for Organisation and Innovation (COI)
University of Sheffield
3rd March 2003
SELECTED REFERENCES FROM IWP RESEARCH
Axtell, C., Holman, D., Unsworth, K., Wall, T., Waterson, P., & Harrington, E. (2000).
Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73: 265-285.
7
8/6/2019 Developing+an+Innovation+Culture
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/developinganinnovationculture 8/8
Discussion paper for Department of Trade and Industry Innovation Review March 2003
Birdi, K. (2003). Evaluating the effects of creativity training on employee innovation. Paper
presented at the Academy of Management Conference, August, Seattle, USA.
Clegg, C., Unsworth, K., Epitropaki, O. & Parker This document has outlined some of the
issues to be considered when developing an innovation culture. The list is not exhaustive butdoes provide evidence-based recommendations that should go a long way to enhancing and
sustaining innovation in UK organisations
, G. (2002). Implicating trust in the innovation process. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, 75, 409-422.
Clegg et al., (2002). An international study of the use and effectiveness of modern
manufacturing practices. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 12, 171-191.
Leach, D., Totterdell, P., Birdi, K., Clegg, C., Wood, S. & Wall, T. (2001). Innovation atwork: Findings form a survey of innovation in UK organisations. Sheffield: University of
Sheffield.
Leach, D.J., Unsworth, K.L. & Wall, T.D. (2002). What is an idea capture scheme? ‘What
is..?’ series on IWP website at www.shef.ac.uk/~iwp.
Leach, D.J., Jackson, P.R. & Wall, T.D. (2001). Realising the potential of empowerment:
The impact of a feedback intervention on the performance of a complex system. E rgonomics ,
44, 870-886.
Patterson, F. (2000). The Innovation Potential Indicator: Test Manual and Users Guide.Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
Patterson, M.G., West, M.A., Lawthom, R. & Nickell, S. (1997). Impact of People
Management Practices on Business Performance. London: Institute of Personnel and
Development.
Port, R., Patterson, F., Warr, P. & Hegarty, P. (2002). The management of innovation. Paper
presented at the BPS Occupational Psychology Conference, January, Blackpool.
Unsworth, K. & Wall, T.D. (2002). Creative requirement: A neglected construct in the study
of employee creativity. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference , August,
Denver, USA.
Wall, T.D. (2001). A digest of evidence from studies of innovation and performance.
Contribution to – ‘The UK Productivity Challenge: CBI and TUC submission to the
Productivity Initiative’. Report submitted by the CBI and TUC to the Chancellor of the
Exchequer, October 2001. See pp 52-58 and body of text.
Wall, T.D. & Parker, S.K. (2001). Job design. In N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes (Eds)
International Encyclopaedia of Social and Behavioural Sciences (vol 12) , Oxford: Elsevier
Sciences.
8