developing for a consequential illness/injury...illness/condition. 6. the mere fact that an illness...
TRANSCRIPT
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 1
DEVELOPING FOR A
CONSEQUENTIAL ILLNESS/INJURY
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 2
SESSION BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Session Title Developing for a Consequential Illness/Injury
Instructional Time
40 minutes
Session Description
This session covers the requirements for development of a consequential illness or injury. This includes a definition of the term along with examples of consequential illnesses and injuries. The types of medical evidence required to support the claim and the steps that the CE must follow to develop this type of claim are covered.
Instructional Objectives
• Define ‘consequential illness/injury’
• List the steps required to develop for a consequential illness/injury
Instructor Materials
For this session, the following materials are required:
ConsequentialSession.PPT
Trainee Handouts
PM 2 – 1500
Participant Guide References
Consequential Session
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 3
INTRODUCTION
#1
Developing for a Consequential Illness/Injury
1
#2
Introduction – What is it?
Any injury or illness occurring as a result of/due to treatment of accepted occupational illness or covered condition
Illness or injury must occur AFTER primary condition accepted; however, one type of exception to this would be in secondary cancer cases
2
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 4
INTRODUCTION, CONTINUED
In general, the consequential FOLLOWS AFTER the accepted condition. There is ONE exception, which is covered during the discussion of medical evidence.
Instructor NOTE
Emphasize that there must be a direct link between the accepted condition and the consequential illness/injury.
#3
Introduction – Consequential Illness Examples
Radiation pneumonitis
Burns as a result of radiation treatment
Osteoporosis, hip fractures, chronic pain
Depression
Diabetes
3
These illnesses and injuries are examples of medical conditions that may be a result of an employee’s medical treatment for an accepted occupational illness/condition.
In addition to these, metasticized cancer or secondary cancer from the accepted primary site is considered a consequential condition.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 5
INTRODUCTION, CONTINUED
#4
Introduction – Travel-Related Injury Example
Employee travels for medical treatment for accepted medical condition and sustains injury while traveling
4
Instructor NOTE
Other examples of consequential injuries include such incidents as:
• An employee is injured in a car accident while on the way to a doctor’s appointment for treatment of an accepted medical condition.
• An employee falls on ice when entering a radiology clinic for treatment of an accepted cancer and breaks her/his leg.
• While walking down a hospital corridor after a chemo therapy treatment for an accepted cancer, the employee falls on a water spill and breaks her/his arm.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 6
INTRODUCTION, CONTINUED
#5
Introduction – Requirements Must have an accepted primary occupational illness
or covered condition
Claimant must provide written statement describing consequential condition
Medical evidence establishing causal connection between consequential condition and accepted occupational illness or covered condition
5
Transition Now let’s turn attention to the medical evidence required for a consequential illness or injury.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 7
REQUIRED MEDICAL EVIDENCE
#6
Required Medical Evidence – Types
Employee’s medical history
Diagnostic/physical findings (e.g., pathology report) for new condition
Diagnosis of “new” condition
Medical narrative discussing connection between new condition and accepted occupational illness/condition
6
The mere fact that an illness or injury arises subsequent to the acceptance of a covered condition is insufficient unless there is an obvious link.
The medical evidence must show a relationship of the new illness/injury to the primary accepted condition/occupational illness.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 8
REQUIRED MEDICAL EVIDENCE, CONTINUED
#7
Required Medical Evidence – MetastasizedCancers Diagnosis of secondary cancer and labeled
“metastasis”
Date of diagnosis of secondary cancer:• After date of diagnosis for primary cancer
• At same time primary cancer diagnosed
• Before date of diagnosis of primary cancer if primary site unknown
7
The CE may accept the metastasized cancer from an accepted primary cancer without extensive investigation as long as the claimant provides medical evidence that establishes a metastatic secondary cancer including the date of diagnosis.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 9
REQUIRED MEDICAL EVIDENCE, CONTINUED
#8
Required Medical Evidence – Travel-Related Injuries Written statement describing consequential
condition from claimant how injury related to accepted condition
Diagnostic/physical findings (e.g., pathology report) explaining how diagnosis established
8
#9
Required Medical Evidence – CE Assessment Use reasonable judgment May accept condition upon receipt of medical evidence from
treating physician In some complex cases, may find relationship between
claimed consequential condition and accepted condition questionable -- may require clarification from treating physician, DMC review or second opinion
Natural progression illnesses – result from treatment of silicosis and CBD; Usually accept these conditions based on a diagnosis and medical rationale from a physician
9
Transition Now let’s look at how to develop for a consequential illness or injury.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 10
DEVELOPMENT STEPS
#10
Development Steps
Send letter to claimant identifying evidence needed
Review evidence
Conduct follow-up for additional evidence as required
10
Allow claimant an opportunity to respond and to submit additional evidence.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 11
DEVELOPMENT STEPS, CONTINUED
#11
Development Steps, continued
Accept if:• Primary condition already accepted – Notify claimant by
letter of acceptance of consequential Illness
• Case in posture for acceptance – Prepare RD for primary condition and include acceptance for secondary/consequential illness in same decision
11
#12
Development Steps, continued
ECMS coding:
On this screen: Enter this information:
Claim Status DM [sent letter] + date (status effective date)
Medical Status Q_ [consequential] + type of conditionMedical Condition A [accepted]
12
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 12
DEVELOPMENT STEPS, CONTINUED
Claim Status - The status effective date is the first manifestation of the illness, but after the primary condition date and the date the employee claimed the illness.
Medical Status - All consequential codes begin with ‘Q’.
Medical Condition - ‘A’ is entered on the Medical Condition screen since there is a Final Decision to accept for a primary condition.
#13
Development Steps, continuedOnce coded, medical eligibility file can be updated and related medical bills can be paid for consequential condition
13
Transition Now that we’ve reviewed the requirements for a consequential illness/injury, let’s work through a ‘real-life’ case example.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 13
CONSEQUENTIAL ILLNESS CASE STUDY
Instructor NOTE
This case study is conducted as a large group activity. Fifteen (15) minutes are allotted for this activity.
#14
Case Study - General Information & Evidence submitted an EEOICPA claim for
colon cancer on August 15, 2001.
FAB accepted the claim on September 10, 2001 based on Mr. Square’s SEC employment and supporting medical evidence of colon cancer.
Subsequent to the FD, faxed two documents to your DO – medical imaging report and cytology report
14
Instructor’s Note
The Medical Imaging Report and Cytology report appear on the next two pages.
Participant’s Guide
Case Study Materials are located in the Participant’s Guide on page 14.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 14
CONSEQUENTIAL ILLNESS CASE STUDY, CONTINUED
MEDICAL IMAGING REPORT
First Crest M E D I C A L C E N T E R
100 First Crest Drive Springfield TN 37110 615-555-2140 Patient Name: Requesting Physician: Anthony Physician, MD Attending Physician: Dictating Physician: Jeffrey Doctor, MD Admission Date: Room #: Date of Service: 04/22/2003 MR#: 11-69-31 Order #: 123456 Job # 000000XXXX Reason: Liver Lesion Birth: 03/01/1945 Patient Type: 23 Comments: SDS 15
Medical Imaging Report 76153 CT GUIDED LIVER BIOPSY
CLINICAL DATA: History of colon carcinoma and abnormal liver lesions
CODES: 76360, 47000 Report: After informed consent was obtained, the patient was placed supine on the CT table. Non-contrast images of the abdomen were obtained (recent diagnosis contrast study unavailable for comparison purposes – checked out of jacket). At least multiple abnormal areas of low attenuation are noted with the superior aspects of both the right and left hepatic lobes. A lesion was noted in the central aspect of the liver and skin was marked and then prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. Local, 1% Lidocaine, anesthesia was administered. A small skin incision was made. A 19 gauge guide needled was advanced into the liver. Good positioning was confirmed with axial CT images. Two core biopsies were obtained using 20 gauge biopsy instrument. Initial smear evaluation by Dr. Doctor reveals adequate biopsy. No immediate complications were noted. IMPRESSION: Technically successful CT guided liver biopsy. Final pathologic results are pending.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 15
CONSEQUENTIAL ILLNESS CASE STUDY, CONTINUED
CYTOLOGY REPORT
CYTOLOGY First Crest MEDICAL CENTER
100 First Crest Drive Springfield TN 37110
615-555-2140 FAX 615-555-2149
James T. Doctor, Medical Director
Patient: Accession NC99 - 12345678 DOB: 03/01/1945 DATE: 04/22/2003 ACCOUNT 98765 PHYSICIAN: Anthony Physician, MD M/R 38248 CC: Jeffrey Doctor, MD
FINAL DIAGNOSIS LIVER, CT-GUIDED BIOPSY:
METASTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA, COMPATIBLE WITH COLON PRIMARY. (SEE N-991XX5, N99-1X4X)
4/23/2003 FINAL: JAMES T. DOCTOR, M.D. / PAH ** Report Electronically Signed out **
Clinical History: colon cancer Specimen description:
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 16
CONSEQUENTIAL ILLNESS CASE STUDY, CONTINUED
Instructor NOTE
Allow the trainees a few minutes to review the two reports before proceeding to the case study discussion questions.
#15
Case Study - Discussion Questions1. Would you accept these documents as a statement
describing the consequential condition? Why or why not?
2. Was a causal connection established between the primary and secondary conditions? If so, what was the link?
3. What is your next step?
4. What information gets recorded in ECMS?
15
Instructor NOTE
Facilitate discussion around each of the four questions. Before advancing to the next question, make sure to identify the ‘correct’ answer.
# Answers
1 Would you accept these documents as a statement describing the consequential condition? Why or why not? Would accept the documents as a statement describing the consequential decision since they clearly provide a diagnosis of a secondary cancer.
2 Was a causal connection established between the primary and secondary conditions? If so, what was the link?
Yes - the cytology report stated in the final diagnosis that the metastatic adenocarcinoma of the liver was compatible with the primary cancer – colon.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 17
CONSEQUENTIAL ILLNESS CASE STUDY, CONTINUED
# Answers
3 What is your next step?
Notify the claimant by preparing a letter stating that the consequential illness is being accepted
4 What information gets recorded in ECMS? Claim status - DO (for the letter) Medical screen – MT [Metastic Cancer] + April 22, 2003 (date of diagnosis for the consequential condition)
Trainee HANDOUT
Direct the trainees to page 20 for the Case Study Answers.
Transition If there are no other questions or points to be made regarding this case study, we’ll continue with a review of the salient points of this session on consequential illnesses and injuries.
Basic Claims Examiner Training Course Consequential Illness/Injury Session
Instructor Guide Page 18
SESSION SUMMARY
#16
Summary Consequential illness/injury occurs as a result of or due
to treatment of an accepted occupational illness or covered condition
Requirements:• Accepted primary occupational illness or covered condition• Illness/injury occurs AFTER primary condition accepted (except
in some secondary cancer cases, where the secondary cancer was diagnosed before the primary cancer)
• Medical evidence establishing causal connection between consequential illness/injury and accepted covered condition
16
Instructor NOTE
Make sure that all trainees have had the opportunity to ask any outstanding questions about the information that has been covered in this session before proceeding.
Transition This concludes the session on consequential illness and injury.