designing the university for 2030: eportfolio as a catalyst for change
DESCRIPTION
Designing the University for 2030: ePortfolio as a Catalyst for Change. Presentation delivered by Dr. Randy Bass, Vice-Provost for Education, Georgetown University.TRANSCRIPT
Designing the University for 2030: ePor5olio as a Catalyst for Change
Randy Bass Georgetown University
McMasters University
March 28, 2014
PLEASE DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUNT PERMISSION
“The Future of the University as a Design Problem” (Spring 2014) Profs. Ann Pendleton Jullian and Randy Bass
communities of practice
studentfaculty
<20 classes internal projects
cross-COP projects
industry partners
What will the world be like in 2030?
What will the condiYons of knowledge, technology, learning and
work be in 15-‐20 years?
What kind of graduate do we want to produce?
What might a design approach look like?
Changing Capaci>es and Outcomes for the 21st C
“the human labor market will center on three kinds of work: solving unstructured problems, working with new informaYon (including complex communicaYon), and carrying out non-‐rouYne manual tasks.”
What might a design approach look like?
What kind of educaYon is needed at this moment of history?
What kind of educaYon is only possible
in these emerging condiYons?
Our understanding of learning has expanded at a rate that has far outpaced our concepYons of teaching.
Learning Paradigm: Learning –focused Outcome-‐driven Student-‐centered
Expanding understanding of
learning & changing skillset
required for the 21st C Growing mismatch between these
changing aspiraYons for learning and our
structures
High Impact PracYces (NaYonal Survey of Student Engagement-‐-‐NSSE)
• First-‐year seminars and experiences • Learning communiYes • (Common intellectual experiences) • WriYng-‐intensive courses • CollaboraYve assignments • Undergraduate research • Global learning/ study abroad • Internships • Community-‐based learning • Capstone courses and projects George Kuh, High Impact Prac7ces: What are they, who has access to them, and why they ma=er. (AAC&U, 2008)
Formal undergraduate curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
Study abroad Undergraduate research
Community-‐based learning
First-‐year Seminars
Wri>ng-‐intensive Capstone courses
Collabora>ve Assignments
Where are the high-‐impact prac>ces located?
Student Affairs Advising
Internships
Formal undergraduate curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
Accountable talk and thinking
Meet challenges to perspecYves and belief, take risks, operate outside comfort zone
Get (and give) frequent and meaningful feedback
Make daily decisions – judgment in uncertainty
NEW ECOLOGY FOR LEARNING
What makes High Impact Prac>ces high impact?
Invest Yme and effort (Yme on task)
Opportunity to integrate, synthesize, make meaning
Changing Capaci>es and Outcomes for the 21st C
“the human labor market will center on three kinds of work: solving unstructured problems, working with new informaYon (including complex communicaYon), and carrying out non-‐rouYne manual tasks.”
Formal undergraduate curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
Accountable talk and thinking
Meet challenges to perspecYves and belief, take risks, operate outside comfort zone
Get (and give) frequent and meaningful feedback
Make daily decisions – judgment in uncertainty
NEW ECOLOGY FOR LEARNING
What makes High Impact Prac>ces high impact?
Invest Yme and effort (Yme on task)
Opportunity to integrate, synthesize, make meaning
ePor5iolio help insYtuYons address prioriYes and meet challenges they didn’t know they had thirty years ago.
“ePor5olio is rare among innovaYons in that they are not really replacing anything.” (Trent Batson)
Learning Por5olios
• Kathleen Yancey
Delivered Curriculum
Experienced Curriculum
Lived Curriculum
“the first and most important principle about ePor5olios is that they are student-‐owned space. That’s a paradigm shik for many.”
Howard Wach, LGCC
Connect to Learning • FIPSE Funded naYonal project, led by LaGuardia’s Making ConnecYons NaYonal Resource Center
• Partnership w/ AAEEBL, Trent & Judy Batson • Bret Eynon, Director • Judit Torok, Co-‐director • Laura Gambino, Research Director • Mikhail ValenYn, Web Design • Randy Bass & Helen Chen Senior Research Scholars
What Difference does ePorSolio Make? C2L evidence supports 3 preliminary claims
SophisYcated ePor5olio iniYaYves:
1. Advance Student Learning & Success 2. Make Student Learning Visible 3. Catalyze InsYtuYonal Change
Claim # 1: ePor.olio ini0a0ves Advance Student Learning & Success
At a growing number of campuses with sustained por5olio iniYaYves ePor5olio pracYces correlate with higher levels of student success, as measured by pass rates, GPA, retenYon, graduaYon, etc.
Claim # 1: ePorSolio ini>a>ves advance student learning & success.
Helping students reflect on & connect their learning across academic, co-‐curricular and community-‐based learning experiences, sophisYcated ePor5olio pracYces correlate with higher levels of student success, as measured by pass rates, GPA and retenYon.
40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60
2009-10 Academic Year
Comparison Courses
49.4%
ePortfolio Courses
58.3% LaGuardia CC High Pass Rates
(C & up)
ePor5olio was introduced into a required first semester “Mission” course in 2008-‐9, and student performance improved
Pre ePorSolio (2007-‐8)
Post ePorSolio 2009-‐12
GPA in Mission Course
B (3.213) B+ (3.508)
GPA in all first semester courses
B-‐ (2.933) B (3.095)
ePorSolio integrated into Metro Health Academies, an SFSU learning community project for high-‐risk students
Metro Academy, First Year/First Time Students
All SFSU First Year/ First Time Students
1 Yr Retention Rate 90.0% 79.3%
3 Yr Retention Rate 79.0% 60.0%
4 Yr Grad’n Rate 24.6% 14.9%
Tunxis Community College
52.7%
60.9% 66.2%
71.4%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
No ePorSolio Courses 1 ePorSolio Course 2 ePorSolio Courses 3 ePorSolio Courses
Spring to Fall Reten>on Rates
How does ePorSolio Shape the Student Learning Experience?
C2L Core Survey • Conducted on mulYple C2L campuses across three semesters: Fall 2011, Spring 2012, Fall 2012 (Spring 2013 pending) n=6,729
• Goal: to build a common data set that can help us berer understand the contours of the ePor5olio-‐enhanced student learning experience
Building my ePorSolio Agree/ Strongly Agree
Helped me make connecYons between ideas 75.6%
Helped me think more deeply about course content 64.4% Allowed me to be more aware of my growth & development as a learner
69.3%
My (ePorSolio-‐enhanced) course engaged me in… Quite a Bit/ Very Much
Synthesizing & organizing ideas, informaYon or experiences in new ways
83.1%
Applying theories or concepts to pracYcal problems or in new situaYons
77.2%
My course contributed to my knowledge, skills and personal development in understanding myself
78.6%
Formal undergraduate curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
Accountable talk and thinking
Meet challenges to perspecYves and belief, take risks, operate outside comfort zone
Get (and give) frequent and meaningful feedback
Make daily decisions – judgment in uncertainty
NEW ECOLOGY FOR LEARNING
What makes High Impact Prac>ces high impact?
Invest Yme and effort (Yme on task)
Opportunity to integrate, synthesize, make meaning
Claim #2: ePor.olio Ini0a0ves Make Student Learning Visible
ePorSolio ini>a>ves support reflec>on, social pedagogy, and deep learning.
Helping students reflect on and connect their learning across academic and co-‐curricular learning experiences, sophisYcated ePor5olio pracYces transform the student learning experience. Advancing higher order thinking and integraYve learning, the connecYve ePor5olio helps students construct purposeful idenYYes as learners.
Making Learning Visible to Others
ePorSolio as a Social Pedagogy
• Feedback, Peer CriYques • External Audiences – Family, Professionals, Experts in the field
• CollaboraYng on Shared Projects
• ConstrucYng Sustained Knowledge CommuniYes
Building my ePorSolio helped me to make connec>ons between ideas…
37.6
82.3
49.1
89.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Low Instructor Feedback
High Instructor Feedback
Low Student Feedback
High Student Feedback
% Agree/Strongly
SophisYcated ePor5olio pracYce makes the integraYve qualiYes of student learning visible to faculty and the insYtuYon. Grounding outcomes assessment in these arYfacts helps faculty see classrooms, students, and their own work in new contexts, empowering them to “close the loop” in unique and powerful ways.
Authen>c Ar>facts of Integra>ve Learning
Purposeful Faculty Engagement
Learning-‐Focused Ins>tu>onal Outcomes Assessment
Re-‐Design Program Curricula & Pedagogy
Claim #3: ePor.olio ini0a0ves Catalyze learning-‐centered
Ins>tu>onal Change Focusing arenYon on student learning and prompYng purposeful connecYon across departments and divisions, ePor5olio iniYaYves can catalyze campus cultural and structural change, helping the insYtuYon move towards becoming an adapYve learning organizaYon.
What do successful campuses do to launch, build and sustain effecYve ePor5olio iniYaYves? What Does it Take to Make a Difference?
Catalyze Ins>tu>onal Change
U. Delaware – Faculty using eP in assessment report • Increased engagement with colleagues • New insights into the ways students interpreted & completed assignments
• Understood more deeply how their course fit into a broader program
Manharanville College – • ePor5olio-‐focused prof’l dev’t spurs interest in pedagogy.
• College creates & funds a new Center for Teaching & Learning
LaGuardia CC – ePor5olio supports sustained focus on integraYve learning,. • In 2012, LaGuardia restructures to merge Academic & Student Affairs. Advisement, assessment, prof’l dev’t reorganized to address the whole student.
hrp://pando.com/2013/09/13/moocs-‐and-‐the-‐gartner-‐hype-‐cycle-‐a-‐very-‐slow-‐tsunami/
Gartner Group Hype Cycle
MOOC Hype Cycle
The split logic of the learning paradigm
IntegraYve (holisYc, coherent): Design of whole learning experiences Curricular and co-‐curricular Competencies conceived as part of a whole vision of learning ConnecYons Forma7on
DisintegraYve (granular): Design of discrete experiences Outcomes driven Competency-‐based Focus on what’s measureable Learning decoupled from formal boundaries
High impact integra>ve curriculum
Formal undergraduate curriculum
ExperienYal co-‐curriculum
Founda>onal Knowledge Some generic and interchangeable Some insYtuYonally-‐disYncYve experYse
Local and Iden>ty Jesuit and Catholic
Mentor-‐based tradiYon
ResidenYal, Diverse
Blended
Massive Online
InsYtuYonal Brand and IdenYty
Engaging Difference Ethical Judgment Self-‐ReflecYon PracYYoner educaYon, leadership
LOCUS OF INTEGRATIVE LEARNING
KNOWLEDG
E: Spe
cialize
d and Broad / IntegraYve
Skills and Abili>es (competencies)
Disposi>ons (character traits)
Values
Analysis (criYcal thinking)
Problem-‐Solving Inquiry and Research
InformaYon literacy
QuanYtaYve Reasoning CommunicaYon
(wriren, oral, visual)
IntegraYon & synthesis CreaYvity Leadership
ReflecYon
Ethical judgment
CriYcal Empathy Openness
CollaboraYon
Grit Resilience Risk-‐taking Curiosity
Humility
Self-‐awareness Self-‐efficacy Well-‐being Agency
ReflecYveness
Moral discernment Integrity
Trust Respect
Compassion
Common Good Social JusYce
Human Dignity Human Flourishing
Knowing that
Knowing how
Judgment
Psychosocial
Civic
High impact integra>ve curriculum
Founda>onal Knowledge Some generic and interchangeable Some insYtuYonally-‐disYncYve experYse
Local and Iden>ty-‐specific
Urban sewng Community-‐based
Mentor-‐based ResidenYal, Diverse
Learning PorSolios and the future recentered Curriculum
Contribu>on to a knowledge community
Unstructured problems Interdisciplinary Inquiry Social learning
Self-‐authorship
Developmental Outcomes
Students learn on an arc that moves them inward and
outward
Knowledge/skills in the context of … Capaci>es
and disposi>ons creaYvity, resilience,
empathy, responsibility, curiosity, self-‐awareness
Building my ePorSolio Agree/ Strongly Agree
Allowed me to be more aware of my growth & development as a learner 69.3%
Helped me make connecYons between ideas 75.6%
“Through my ePor5olio I learned how to express myself as a hard working student. Being a shy girl was always an issue for me. This ePor5olio helped me to see a new me… the potenYal I have as a student and what I want to accomplish in my life.” Rezwana Islam
Por5olios: You have to Look IN, Before you can Look OUT
What’s My Story? What’s My Story for Others? What’s My Story in New
Media?
Master’s Program in Communication, Culture and Technology (Georgetown) Professor Jeanine Turner
Northeastern University
• “[based on our read of the por5olios… the redesign transformed the program from a collecYon of courses into an intenYonally designed learning experience… from a ‘degree with a por5olio requirement’ into a por5olio program whose students graduate with a collecYon of signature work that evidences their capabiliYes.”
“Are we who we think we are? ePorColios as a Tool for Curriculum Redesign.” Gail Ma=hews-‐DeNatale
High impact integra>ve curriculum
Founda>onal Knowledge Some generic and interchangeable Some insYtuYonally-‐disYncYve experYse
Local and Iden>ty-‐specific
Urban sewng Community-‐based
Mentor-‐based ResidenYal, Diverse
Learning PorSolios and the future recentered Curriculum
Contribu>on to a knowledge community
Unstructured complex problems Interdisciplinary Inquiry Social learning
Self-‐authorship
Developmental Outcomes
Students learn on an arc that moves them inward and
outward
CapaciYes and disposiYons
creaYvity, resilience, empathy, responsibility,
curiosity
DESIGN CHALLENGE: What will university educa>on be for in
2030?
Jack DeGioia, President, Georgetown
Three interlocking and inseparable elements of the University: • FormaYon of men and women
• Knowledge-‐creaYon through scholarship and research
• Public Good and the Common Good
QuesYons, Comments, Feedback
Randy Bass Georgetown University
PLEASE DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUNT PERMISSION